Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Jan;109(1):67–69. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0110967

High incidence of a male-specific genetic marker in phenotypic female chinook salmon from the Columbia River.

J J Nagler 1, J Bouma 1, G H Thorgaard 1, D D Dauble 1
PMCID: PMC1242053  PMID: 11171527

Abstract

Numerous populations of anadromous salmonids in the northwestern United States have been declining for many years, resulting in Endangered Species Act listings and in some cases extinction. The degradation of river ecosystems has been proposed as one of the major reasons for the inability of salmon to maintain their populations. However, the specific factors interfering with the reproduction and survival of salmon during the freshwater phase of their life cycle have not been fully described. This study was initiated to determine the incidence of phenotypic sex reversal in wild, fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytcha) that returned to spawn in the Columbia River. Fish were sampled at different locations within this watershed to determine whether they were faithfully expressing their genotype. We report a high incidence (84%) of a genetic marker for the Y chromosome in phenotypic females sampled from the wild, which was not observed in female fish raised in hatcheries. It appears likely that female salmon with a male genotype have been sex reversed, creating the potential for an abnormal YY genotype in the wild that would produce all-male offspring and alter sex ratios significantly.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (53.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jobling S., Reynolds T., White R., Parker M. G., Sumpter J. P. A variety of environmentally persistent chemicals, including some phthalate plasticizers, are weakly estrogenic. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Jun;103(6):582–587. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnson M. L., Salveson A., Holmes L., Denison M. S., Fry D. M. Environmental estrogens in agricultural drain water from the central valley of California. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1998 Apr;60(4):609–614. doi: 10.1007/s001289900669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Parsons J. E., Thorgaard G. H. Production of androgenetic diploid rainbow trout. J Hered. 1985 May-Jun;76(3):177–181. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Petit F., Le Goff P., Cravédi J. P., Valotaire Y., Pakdel F. Two complementary bioassays for screening the estrogenic potency of xenobiotics: recombinant yeast for trout estrogen receptor and trout hepatocyte cultures. J Mol Endocrinol. 1997 Dec;19(3):321–335. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0190321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Scheerer P. D., Thorgaard G. H., Allendorf F. W. Genetic analysis of androgenetic rainbow trout. J Exp Zool. 1991 Dec;260(3):382–390. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402600312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang L. H., Tsai C. L. Effects of temperature on the deformity and sex differentiation of tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus. J Exp Zool. 2000 Apr 1;286(5):534–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES