Abstract
In liver diseases, the interplay of different noncoding RNA expressions, and inflammatory biomarkers show high context dependencies. Interrelations between these noncoding RNA and inflammatory biomarkers paved the way for the diagnosis of various diseases. Here, we analyzed the expression of MALAT1, miR-181a in liver cirrhosis and a panel of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-17, SIRT1 and NF-Ƙβ p65). The association between all measured parameters was monitored. Fifty healthy volunteers with normal liver function, hepatic ultrasonography, and negative results for HCV and HBV participated in our study as a healthy control group. In addition, hundred and fifty patients with liver cirrhosis were included. Compared with healthy controls, miR-181a expression was significantly decreased (p < 0.01), while MALAT1 expression was significantly elevated (p < 0.01) in patients with liver cirrhosis. IL-17 and NF-ƘB p65 were significantly increased (p < 0.001), while SIRT1 was significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in cirrhotic patients compared to controls. Serum expression of SIRT1 significantly positively correlated with miR-181a and negatively associated with MALAT-1, NF-Ƙβ p65, and IL-17expression levels. Our results pointed to alterations in the expression levels of miR-181a, and MALAT1 could serve as biomarkers in cirrhotic patients. Reduction of IL-17 and NF-Ƙβ p65 in combination with an elevation of SIRT-1 might refer to the dual effects of miR-181a and MALAT1 in controlling inflammation in liver cirrhosis.
Keywords: MALAT1, miR-146a, IL-17, SIRT1, NF-Ƙβ p65, Liver cirrhosis
Introduction
Liver cirrhosis has a poor prognosis; thus, a precise evaluation of fibrosis is essential, as liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression are closely linked [1]. The correct staging of liver cirrhosis is critical for prioritizing treatment for HCC patients, especially for clinical decision-making in management and therapy, it is therefore critical to distinguish individuals with advanced cirrhosis from those with no or mild cirrhosis.
Biomarker assessments, including dysregulated noncoding RNA (ncRNA), are more objective and reproducible compared to imaging-based modalities and are considered adjunct tools [2]. Several abnormal non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been identified in liver diseases, targeting genes that eventually contribute to tumorigenesis, proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair, invasion, and metastasis. These findings have led to exploring miRNAs as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis and prediction of prognosis of numerous diseases and to be effective therapeutic targets, given their abundance in the plasma and easy detectability [3, 4].
MicroRNAs are a group of noncoding RNAs that are involved in many cellular processes [5, 6] that play a crucial role in hepatic fibrogenesis beyond activating hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and depositing extracellular matrix (ECM); considering their roles microRNAs may even be used as indicators of disease progression [7]. The brain, liver, and lymphoid organs express miR-181 family members most frequently [8]. miR-181a and b are the most frequent in the etiopathogenesis of lymphoid, brain, and liver malignancies [8, 9]. miR-181a plays a crucial role in regulating the expression of both anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines [10]. Additionally, it demonstrates highly effective immune-modulatory functions [11]. Due to its capability to control the expression of genes involved in mitochondrial function, it holds great promise as a biomarker for diagnosing and predicting various metabolic disorders.
LncRNAs are a second family of non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression by interfering with mRNA expression or competing at genomic loci for transcription factors [12]. They modulate multiple roles in the degradation of mRNA in a contextual manner. Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) gene is 8.7 kb long and found on chromosome 11q13; which regulates the expression of many distinct genes by affecting various stages of their transcription and elongation [13]. It was first discovered in the early stages of non-small cell lung cancer, from which its name derived, and its dysregulation has associated with several human cancers, including breast, colorectal, and hepatocellular carcinoma [14].
Silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) is a protein that regulates cellular processes like aging, inflammation, and stress resistance [15]. In addition, activation of SIRT1 has been found to reduce liver fibrosis by inhibiting the activation of hepatic stellate cells, which are responsible for liver fibrosis. SIRT1 activation can suppress the production of extracellular matrix proteins and slow down the progression of liver fibrosis. Overall, SIRT1 plays a protective role in liver health, and its activation has shown potential as a therapeutic target for various liver diseases in preclinical studies. However, further research is needed to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of SIRT1 on liver diseases.
IL-17 is the most important cytokine representing Th17 and can induce pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and cause tissue cell infiltration and tissue destruction [16]. The biological actions of IL-17 may stimulate the development of neutrophils and macrophages at the site of inflammation, escalating liver injury, which plays a role in pathogenesis and the body’s response to many diseases. Moreover, IL-17 plays a crucial role in hepatocytes by facilitating systemic inflammation and attracting inflammatory cells to the liver. It is also associated with the development of fibrosis and insulin resistance [17]. Elevated levels of IL-17 have been linked to the progression of NAFLD to steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma [17].
To our knowledge, miR-181a and MALAT-1 expression levels were dysregulated in cirrhotic patients with varying grades. However, their correlation with IL-17 and their crosstalk with the SIRT1/NF-κβ axis were not explored. Thus, we assessed whether circulating miR-181a / MALAT1 and IL-17 could be used as biomarkers for monitoring the grade of liver cirrhosis. Moreover, we examined the correlation between the cross-linked SIRT1/NF-Ƙβ axis and the grade of liver cirrhosis.
Materials and Methods
Fifty healthy volunteers with normal liver function, hepatic ultrasonography, and negative results for HCV and HBV participated in our study as a healthy control group. Healthy volunteers, matched by age and sex and with no history of liver cirrhosis or inflammatory disease, were selected for the study. In addition, hundred and fifty patients with hepatic diseases were included and classified according to the Child–Pugh classification [18, 19] into the Child A group (50 patients), Child B group (40 patients), and Child C group (60 patients).
Every patient had a clinical evaluation as well as laboratory tests. Based on imaging investigations, including abdominal ultrasonography with Doppler and upper endoscopy for the functional assessment of decompensated cases, patients are diagnosed as having liver cirrhosis. The study excluded patients with active schistosomiasis, hepatitis virus, cardiovascular illness, thyroid dysfunction, diabetes mellitus (DM), and alcohol consumption. The study proposal was complied with by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University (FMBSUREC/07062022), in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and best clinical practice recommendations.
Following an overnight fast, each participant had blood samples (10 mL) taken. Two aliquots of blood samples were taken. The serum for all routine and serological assays was separated from the first aliquot using centrifugation, and kept at − 80 °C.
Transaminase enzymes (ALT and AST) and total bilirubin levels were determined in serum samples using dedicated kits from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Penzberg, Germany), according to Huang et al. [20] and Landis et al. [21], respectively. Interleukin 17 (IL-17) was assayed using an ELISA kit from Cloud-Clone Corp.
For RNA isolation, serum samples were mixed with Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Plus (Cat# R2072, ZYMO RESEARCH Corp., USA), then following the manufacturer’s recommendations, reverse transcription using the SuperScript IV One-Step RT-PCR kit (Cat# 12,594,100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by real-time PCR (Step One Applied Biosystems, USA). Each quantitative PCR reaction was tested twice for accuracy. The PCR data sheet included cycle threshold (Ct) values of the assessed genes has-miRNA-181a versus the corresponding housekeeping gene, RUN U6B. MALAT1 versus the corresponding housekeeping gene (GAPDH). miRNA-181a and MALAT1 expression levels were calculated using the 2 − ΔΔCt formula, According to Livak and Schmittgen [22].
NF-Ƙβ p65 and SIRT1 Expression analysis
From Bio-Rad Inc., the Protein Extraction Kit ReadyPrepTM. (catalog #163–2086) added to each sample of lysed cells from each group. Protein analysis was performed for each sample using the Bradford assay (Bio Basic Inc., Canada), followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Subsequently, BioRad Trans-Blot Turbo was used to transfer protein bands from the gel to the membrane. The primary antibodies for SIRT1 and NF-Ƙβ were incubated on the membrane for an entire night (Rockland, Philadelphia, USA). Then, a secondary antibody with HRP-conjugated was applied to the membrane. Chemiluminescent substrate (Catalog#170–5060)was then incubated and applied to the blots. The Harlow and Lane [22] method of protein normalization was used to detect the target protein on the ChemiDoc MP imager in comparison to the control sample beta-actin (housekeeping protein).
Statistical Analysis
Comparisons between multiple groups were done using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc for pairwise comparisons. p < 0.05 implies a significant value.
Results
This cross-sectional controlled study conducted one hundred and fifty cirrhotic patients with different Child–Pugh classes (A, B, and C) who were divided into three groups. Group I included 50 patients (33 males and 27 females; mean age, 42.13 ± 3.98). Group II included 40 patients, including 25 males and 15 females (mean age, 40.73 ± 4.97), while Group III also included 60 patients, including 35 males and 25 females (mean age, 42.83 ± 5.20). Fifty patients with healthy physical and laboratory examinations were enrolled as controls, including 24 males and 26 females (mean age, 39.33 ± 4.18). The ages and gender composition between the groups did not differ statistically (p > 0.05). Compared to the healthy control participant, patients in group I, II, and III had significantly higher elevation in ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and INR as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
The demographic data age, gender, and liver function profile among study participants
| Variables | Healthy control (50) | GI(50) | GII(40) | GIII(60) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| (mean ± SD) | 39.33 ± 4.18a | 42.13 ± 3.98ab | 40.73 ± 4.97ab | 42.83 ± 5.20b |
| Gender | ||||
| Male (n,%) | 24 (48%) | 33 (66%) | 25 (62.5%) | 35 (58.33%) |
| Female (n, %) | 26 (52%) | 27 (44%) | 15 (37.5%) | 25 (41.67%) |
| ALT | 14.73 ± 0.64a | 31.96 ± 0.70b | 51.33 ± 0.70c | 68.78 ± 0.83d |
| AST | 15.73 ± 0.92a | 31.13 ± 0.80b | 53.08 ± 0.74c | 69.90 ± 0.60d |
| Total bilirubin | 0.49 ± 0.09a | 0.85 ± 0.02b | 1.75 ± 0.07c | 2.81 ± 0.04d |
| Albumin | 4.60 ± 0.05d | 3.95 ± 0.03c | 3.21 ± 0.05b | 2.53 ± 0.07a |
| INR | 1.00 ± .001a | 1.24 ± 0.01b | 1.88 ± 0.02c | 2.01 ± 0.01d |
ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and albumin levels are represented as Mean ± SEM. GI (child A patients): GII (child B patients); and GIII (child C patients). According to the Tukey’s multiple range test, the different letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05). Values which share the same superscript symbol are not significantly (p > 0.05) different
ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; INR, international normalized ratio
The expression of IL-17, and MALAT-1 was investigated, and the results are shown in Table 2. The expression of NF-κβ p65, and SIRT-1 was investigated, and the results are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1. Comparison of serum IL-17, MALAT-1, and NF-Ƙβ p65 expression levels between different studied groups displayed an increasing tendency towards statistically significant fold elevation in the serum of cirrhotic patients in groups I, II, and III in comparison to healthy control participants. Moreover, cirrhotic patients in group III showed significant upregulation of IL-17, MALAT-1, and NF-κβ compared with cirrhotic patients in groups I and II. Additionally, serum expression levels of miR-181a, and SIRT-1 in cirrhotic patients in groups I, II, and III displayed a significant decline compared to healthy control participants. Table 2 demonstrates that miR-181a and SIRT-1 were considerably downregulated in group III cirrhotic patients in comparison to groups I and II.
Table 2.
Changes in the levels of IL-17, and relative expression of MALAT1 and miR-181a among study participants
| Variables | Healthy control (50) | GI(50) | GII(40) | GIII(60) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-17 (pg/mL) | 36.29 ± 1.39a | 143.65 ± 2.20b | 293.14 ± 2.46c | 394.76 ± 2.06d |
| MALAT1 | 0.98 ± 0.01a | 3.06 ± 0.17b | 4.98 ± 0.34c | 8.33 ± 0.52d |
| MiR-181a | 1.03 ± 0.03d | 0.43 ± 0.01c | 0.26 ± 0.01b | 0.08 ± 0.01a |
| NF-Ƙβ | 0.97 ± 0.01a | 2.17 ± 0.04b | 3.12 ± 0.05c | 4.26 ± 0.05d |
| SIRT-1 | 0.97 ± 0.01d | 0.73 ± 0.01c | 0.49 ± 0.01b | 0.20 ± 0.01a |
All data are represented as Mean ± SEM. GI (child A patients): GII (child B patients); and GIII (child C patients). According to the Tukey’s multiple range test, the different letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05). Values which share the same superscript symbol are not significantly (p > 0.05) different
IL-17, Interleukin 17; MALAT1, metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript-1; miR-181a, microRNA-181a; NF-Ƙβ, nuclear factor-kabba beta; SIRT-1, silent information regulator-1; SEM, standard error mean
Fig. 1.

SIRT1 and NF-Ƙβ expression levels among study participants
Correlation Analysis Between IL-17; MALAT1; miR-181a; NF-Ƙβ p65, and SIRT1 Among Study Participants
Serum expression of IL-17 was positively correlated with serum NF-Ƙβ, whereas MALAT-1 expression in cirrhotic patients was significantly negatively correlated with serum expression of SIRT1 and miR-181a, as shown in Table 3. NF-κβ expression levels were negatively associated with serum expression of miR-181a (p < 0.01) and SIRT1 (p < 0.01) and positively correlated with MALAT-1 (p < 0.01) and IL-17 (p < 0.01). Moreover, serum expression of SIRT1 significantly positively correlated with miR-181a and negatively associated with MALAT-1, NF-Ƙβ p65, and IL-17expression levels, as shown in Table 3. Moreover, our results revealed a negative correlation between serum expression levels of MALAT1 and miR-181a (p < 0.01) (Table 3).
Table 3.
The correlation between IL-17; MALAT1; miR-181a; NF-Ƙβ, and SIRT1 among study participants
| Parameter | IL-17 | SIRT-1 | NF-Ƙβ | MALAT-1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | p | R | p | R | P | R | p | |
| miR-181a | − 0.893** | < 0.01 | 0.867** | < 0.01 | − 0.895** | < 0.01 | − 0.834** | < 0.01 |
| MALAT-1 | 0.948** | < 0.01 | − 0.929** | < 0.01 | 0.931** | < 0.01 | – | – |
| NF-Ƙβ | 0.964** | < 0.01 | − 0.941** | < 0.01 | – | – | 0.931** | < 0.01 |
| SIRT-1 | − 0.953** | < 0.01 | – | – | − 0.941** | < 0.01 | − 0.749** | < 0.01 |
| IL-17 | – | – | − 0.953** | < 0.01 | 0.964** | < 0.01 | 0.769** | < 0.01 |
**Significant linear correlation at p < 0.01 (2-tailed)
Diagnostic Performance of Serum miR-181a, and MALAT-1
ROC analysis revealed that differentially expressed serum MALAT-1 and miR-181a could significantly discriminate cirrhotic patients from healthy participants with AUC values of 0.990 and 1.00, respectively, and a sensitivity of 97.5% and 100%, and specificity of 100%, at a cutoff value of 1.225 and 0.715, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). Notably, the diagnostic accuracy of serum mir-181a was most significant than that of serum MALAT-1 in discriminating patients with cirrhosis. Serum MALAT-1, and miR-181a levels could also differentiate patients with grade III from those with grade I and II, with an area under the curve of 0.840 and 0.996, respectively. At the cut-off values of 8.375, 0.185, with a sensitivity of 65%, 100%, and specificity of 100% and 93.75%, respectively, as shown in Fig. 2c and d.
Fig. 2.
ROC analysis regarding a, b MALAT1, and miR-181a discrimination between cirrhotic patients and healthy participants. c, d MALAT1, and miR-181a discrimination between grade III from those with grade I and II
Discussion
Liver cirrhosis (LC) is a major global health concern among the top 20 causes of disability and fatalities. 1.6% of the global burden is attributable to LC, which is among the top 20 causes of disability and fatalities [23]. Egypt had the world’s highest rate of age-standardized death from cirrhosis in 2017, with 103.3 deaths per 100,000. However, the rate decreased by 22.4% due to the rapid drop in the HCV death rate [24]. Therefore, effective bioassays for the diagnosis, prognosis, and surveillance of the illness are required to track the development of liver cirrhosis and may alleviate its progression.
Imaging and liver biopsy are the two primary types of current approaches for LC diagnosis. For clinical presentations that are not immediately apparent, the diagnostic and prognostic values of CT, MRI, ultrasonography, and liver biopsy are constrained [25]. This opens up new avenues for investigating and examining new candidate biomarkers that will satisfy the steady requirements for a perfect surrogate fibrosis marker in LC.
In liver diseases, the interplay of different noncoding RNA expressions, and inflammatory biomarkers show high context dependencies. Interrelations between these noncoding RNA and inflammatory biomarkers has paved the way for the diagnosis of cirrhosis owing to their expression specificity and constancy in body fluids. In our current study, we revealed whether circulation miR-181a / MALAT1 and IL-17 can be used as biomarkers to monitor the grade of liver cirrhosis and scrutinized their correlation with the cross-link SIRT1/NF-Ƙβ axis.
Regarding the laboratory data of our participants, statistically significant differences were noted in ALT, AST, INR, albumin, and total bilirubin levels between healthy and cirrhotic patients. These results are consistent with the findings of Ahmed et al. 2018 [26].
IL-17 plays a critical role in autoimmune diseases by promoting the secretion, release, and chemotaxis of various inflammatory factors to the site of inflammation and by synergizing with them to amplify their biological effects [27]. In line with the literature [28, 29], the current investigation found a substantial rise in serum IL-17 levels in cirrhotic patients compared to healthy participants, indicating that elevated cytokine IL-17 levels are related to crosstalk of hepatocyte inflammatory damage. It is easy to induce the differentiation and release of Th17 cells, which reach the liver through the blood circulation and mediate the development of an autoimmune response. Simultaneously, they secrete numerous inflammatory factors that promote liver inflammatory reactions.
Sirtuin-1 regulates the activity of numerous transcription factors crucial for immunological functions in mammals and acts as an epigenetic regulator [30]. In our investigation, Sirtuin-1 levels were considerably lower in the cirrhotic group than in the control group, which was consistent with the results of Wu et al. (2014), who proved that as liver disease progresses, sirtuin expression levels are downregulated [31]. Our findings suggest that serum levels of SIRT1 may indicate the severity of liver disease as there is a significant inverse association between the expression level of SIRT1 and the degree of cirrhosis as per the Child–Pugh classification.
Inflammatory mediators, which activate or are targeted by NF-κB, unequivocally contribute to the progression of chronic liver disease. The role of NF-κB in regulating the liver’s inflammatory signaling pathways is vital and indisputable. NF-κB is activated in almost all types of chronic liver disease, including alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), viral hepatitis, and biliary liver disease, leaving no room for doubt. Furthermore, NF-κB regulates essential functions in hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Finally, it is unquestionable that genetic inactivation of different components of the NFκB signaling pathway leads to liver damage, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis. Thus, it is an undeniable fact that NF-κB plays an essential role in liver homeostasis processes [32, 33]. In our study, we found significantly elevated levels of serum NF-κβ p65 in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with controls. Furthermore, our data revealed that the level of NF-ĸβ p65 increased gradually among cirrhotic patients as the Child–Pugh classification increased. This is in agreement with [34, 35], who reported that NF-κβ acts as a master regulator of inflammation and cell death in liver cirrhosis.
The aberrant expression of IL-17, SIRT-1, and NF-κβ p65 represents a stepping stone in the progression of liver cirrhosis. Previous studies have revealed a complex mechanism related to inflammation and fibrosis through the upregulation of the expression of inflammatory mediators and non-coding RNA [36]. NF-κB p65 modulates hepatic fibrogenesis predominantly by regulating hepatocyte injury, which is the primary trigger for fibrogenic responses in the liver. Inflammatory and chemotactic factors are secreted frequently by hepatocytes as NF-kβ p65 is activated, which enhances hepatic fibrosis and inflammation [35, 37].
The use of ncRNAs as serum biomarkers for inflammation and fibrosis has gained attention in recent years. Because of the incoherence of the findings and the inadequacy of the studies on the differential expression schemes of miR-181a on liver disorders, we aimed to explore the biochemical contribution of miR-181a expression in cirrhotic subjects and clarify their role in the early diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Our findings demonstrated that miR-181a expression levels noticeably declined in the blood of patients with cirrhosis relative to healthy participants. Consistent with our results, Lima et al. 2021 [38] reported an extraordinary drop in miR-181a levels in the blood of patients with clinically substantial fibrosis. Gupta et al. found higher miR-181a expression in cirrhotic liver tissues, which may be related to enhanced fibrogenesis via TGF-β [39]. As we detected miR-181a in the blood but not in the liver tissue, these data do not dispute our findings.
Extensive research has highlighted the link between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and liver fibrosis development, suggesting that lncRNAs have potential value in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of liver fibrosis [40]. lncRNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) was reported to be a negative regulator of sirtuin 1 [41]. Accordingly, the expression of serum MALAT1 was significantly higher in patients with liver cirrhosis than in healthy controls. Furthermore, serum MALAT1 expression gradually increased with the fibrosis stage, thus indicating that serum MALAT1 can help in the staging of liver fibrosis.
Further analysis showed that serum MALAT1 expression was negatively correlated with the inflammatory factors SIRT-1/ interleukin-17 (IL-17) and miR-181a. Serum MALAT1 expression positively correlates with NF-Ƙβ p65. According to our findings, MALAT1 may influence liver fibrosis and inflammation by reducing the release of anti-inflammatory mediators (such as SIRT-1 and IL-17), which in turn causes exacerbated inflammation. Additionally, via controlling downstream pathways (including the p38 MAPK/p65 NF-B signaling cascade), lncRNA MALAT1 alteration may harm liver tissue and cause tissue damage.
Collectively, our study provides evidence that serum levels of IL-17, miR-181a, and MALAT1 and their possible correlation SIRT1/NF-Ƙβ axis may have great clinical value as accurately promising candidate biomarkers in liver diseases screening, these biomarkers play a role in the pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis disease. Additionally, miR-181a and MALAT1 are promising therapeutic targets for liver fibrosis.
Certain limitations of our study are as follows: (i) the population of enrolled patients and controls was relatively small, which requires a larger sample size for further study to verify our results; (ii) our future work will cover the inclusion of a disease control group, which is crucial to ensure accurate analysis and conclusive results, and (iii) more investigations are required to determine the exact molecular mechanisms by which miR-181a and MALAT1 participate in liver fibrosis pathophysiology.
Funding
The authors declare that no funding for the research received.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical Approval
Our study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Research Ethical Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Beni-Suef, Egypt provided its approval (FMBSUREC/07062022).
Informed Consent
All study participants provided their informed consent permission for participation in this study.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kanda T, Goto T, Hirotsu Y, Moriyama M, Omata M. Molecular mechanisms driving progression of liver cirrhosis towards hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B and C infections: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khaliefa AK, Desouky EM, Hozayen WG, Shaaban SM, Hasona NA. MiRNA-1246, HOTAIR, and IL-39 signature as potential diagnostic biomarkers in breast cancer. Non-coding RNA Res. 2023;8(2):205–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khalil EH, Shaker OG, Hasona NA. Impact of rs2107425 polymorphism and expression of lncH19 and miR-200a on the susceptibility of colorectal cancer. Ind J Clin Biochem. 2022. 10.1007/s12291-022-01052-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abdel Hameed NA, Shaker OG, Hasona NA. Significance of LINC00641 and miR-378 as a potential biomarker for colorectal cancer. Comp Clin Pathol. 2022. 10.1007/s00580-022-03384-8. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hasona NA, Moneim AA, Mohammed EA, et al. Osteocalcin, miR-143, and miR-145 expression in long-standing type 1 diabetes mellitus and their correlation with HbA1c. Ind J Clin Biochem. 2023. 10.1007/s12291-023-01131-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Desouky E, Khaliefa A, Hozayen W, Shaaban S, Hasona N. Signature of miR-21 and MEG-2 and their correlation with TGF-β signaling in breast cancer. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2023;42:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li H, Liu T, Yang Y, Cho WC, Flynn RJ, Harandi MF, et al. Interplays of liver fibrosis-associated microRNAs: molecular mechanisms and implications in diagnosis and therapy. Genes Dis. 2023;10(4):1457–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Iravani SM, Ramzi M, Hesami Z, Kheradmand N, Owjfard M, Abdolyousefi NE, et al. MiR-181a and -b expression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its correlation with acute graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, COVID-19 and torque teno viruses. Virus Dis. 2021;32(4):727–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huang Z, Xu H. MicroRNA-181a-5p regulates inflammatory response of macrophages in sepsis. Open Med. 2019;14(1):899–908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhuang X, Chen Y, Wu Z, Xu Q, Chen M, Shao M, et al. Mitochondrial miR-181a-5p promotes glucose metabolism reprogramming in liver cancer by regulating the electron transport chain. Carcinogenesis. 2020;41:972–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhu J, Yao K, Wang Q, Guo J, Shi H, Ma L, Liu H, et al. Circulating miR-181a as a potential novel biomarker for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;40(6):1591–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mattick JS, Amaral PP, Carninci P, Carpenter S, Chang HY, et al. Long non-coding RNAs: definitions, functions, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24:430–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Arun G, Aggarwal D, Spector DL. MALAT1 long non-coding RNA: functional implications. Noncoding RNA. 2020;6(2):22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li ZX, Zhu QN, Zhang HB, Hu Y, Wang G, Zhu YS. MALAT1: a potential biomarker in cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:6757–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Singh V, Ubaid S. Role of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) in regulating oxidative stress and inflammation. Inflammation. 2020;43(5):1589–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ge Y, Huang M, Yao Y. Biology of interleukin-17 and its pathophysiological significance in sepsis. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 548387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang S, Gang X, Yang S, Cui M, Sun L, Li Z, Wang G. The alterations in and the role of the Th17/Treg balance in metabolic diseases. Front Immunol. 2021;2021(12): 678355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg. 1964;1:1–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60:646–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang J, Choi K, Im S, Yarimaga O, Yoon E, Kim S. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST/GOT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT/GPT) detection techniques. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2006;6(7):756–82. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Westwood A. The analysis of bilirubin in serum. Ann Clin Biochem. 1991. 10.1177/000456329102800202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Harlow E, Lane D. Using antibodies: a laboratory manual. New York, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu YB, Chen MK. Epidemiology of liver cirrhosis and associated complications: current knowledge and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(41):5910–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fouad Y, Esmat G, Elwakil R, Zakaria S, Yosry A, Waked I, El-Razky M, Doss W, El-Serafy M, Mostafa E, Anees M, Sakr MA, AbdelAty N, Omar A, Zaki S, Al-Zahaby A, Mahfouz H, Abdalla M, Albendary M, Hamed AK, Gomaa A, Hasan A, Abdel-Baky S, El Sahhar M, Shiha G, Attia D, Saeed E, Kamal E, Bazeed S, Mehrez M, Abdelaleem S, Gaber Y, Abdallah M, Salama A, Tawab DA, Nafady S. The egyptian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(1):3–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Procopet B, Berzigotti A. Diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: imaging, non-invasive markers of fibrosis and liver biopsy. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2017;5(2):79–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ahmed Z, Ahmed U, Walayat S, Ren J, Martin DK, Moole H, Koppe S, Yong S, Dhillon S. Liver function tests in identifying patients with liver disease. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018;11:301–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Monin L, Gaffen SL. Interleukin 17 family cytokines: signaling mechanisms, biological activities, and therapeutic implications. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10(4): a028522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sun Q, Wang Q, Feng N, Meng Y, Li B, Luo D, Shang X, Lv J, Monsaf AM, Wang C, Ma X. The expression and clinical significance of serum IL-17 in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(16):389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yang Y, Dai J, Yan M, et al. Expression of interleukin-17 is associated with different immune phases in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Eur J Inflam. 2018. 10.1177/2058739218796886. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Chao Y, Zhang J, Jia Y, Tie J, Hu D. Regulation of SIRT1 and Its roles in inflammation. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 831168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu T, Liu Y, Fu Y, Liu X, Zhou X. Direct evidence of sirtuin downregulation in the liver of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2014;44:410–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang T, Ma C, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Hu H. NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer. MedComm. 2020;2(4):618-53. 10.1002/mco2.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Abdel-Samed SA, Hozyen WG, Shaaban SM, et al. Biochemical significance of miR-155 and miR-375 as diagnostic biomarkers and their correlation with the NF-κβ/TNF-α axis in breast cancer. Ind J Clin Biochem. 2022. 10.1007/s12291-022-01101-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Luedde T, Schwabe RF. NF-κB in the liver–linking injury, fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8(2):108–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhao Y, Liu X, Ding C, Gu Y, Liu W. Dihydromyricetin reverses thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis through inhibiting NF-κB-mediated inflammation and TGF-β1-regulated of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 783886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ganguly N, Chakrabarti S. Role of long non-coding RNAs and related epigenetic mechanisms in liver fibrosis (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2021;47(3):04856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lima RVC, Stefano JT, Malta FM, Pinho JRR, Carrilho FJ, Arrese M, Oliveira CP. Ability of a combined FIB4/miRNA181a score to predict significant liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients. Biomedicines. 2021;9(12):1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gupta P, Sata TN, Yadav AK, Mishra A, Vats N, Hossain MM, et al. TGF-β induces liver fibrosis via miRNA-181a-mediated down regulation of augmenter of liver regeneration in hepatic stellate cells. PLoS One. 2019;14(6): e0214534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang Z, Yang X, Gui S, Yang F, Cao Z, Cheng R, Xia X, Li C. The roles and mechanisms of lncRNAs in liver fibrosis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 779606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brahmbhatt HD, Gupta R, Gupta A, Rastogi S, Misri R, Mobeen A, Ghosh A, Kothari P, Sitaniya S, Scaria V, Singh A. The long noncoding RNA MALAT1 suppresses miR-211 to confer protection from ultraviolet-mediated DNA damage in vitiligo epidermis by upregulating sirtuin 1. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(6):1132–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

