Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Oct;109(10):1045–1052. doi: 10.1289/ehp.011091045

Acute sensory responses of nonsmokers at very low environmental tobacco smoke concentrations in controlled laboratory settings.

M H Junker 1, B Danuser 1, C Monn 1, T Koller 1
PMCID: PMC1242082  PMID: 11675270

Abstract

The objective of this study was to provide a basis for effectively protecting nonsmokers from acute sensory impacts and for preventing deterioration of indoor air quality caused by environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) emissions. With an olfactory experiment we determined odor detection thresholds (OT) of sidestream ETS (sETS), and with a full-body exposure experiment we investigated sensory symptoms at very low sETS exposure concentrations. OT concentrations for sETS are three and more orders of magnitude lower than ETS concentrations measured in field settings and correspond to a fresh air dilution volume of > 19,000 m(3) per cigarette, over 100 times more than had previously been suggested for acceptable indoor air conditions. Eye and nasal irritations were observed at one order of magnitude lower sETS concentrations than previously reported, corresponding to a fresh air dilution volume of > 3,000 m(3) per cigarette. These findings have great practical implications for defining indoor air quality standards in indoor compartments where ETS emissions occur. Our study strongly supports the implementation and control of smoking policies such as segregating smoking areas from areas where smoking is not permitted or instituting smoking bans in public buildings.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anthony B. J., Graham F. K. Blink reflex modification by selective attention: evidence for the modulation of 'automatic' processing. Biol Psychol. 1985 Aug;21(1):43–59. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(85)90052-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cummings K. M., Zaki A., Markello S. Variation in sensitivity to environmental tobacco smoke among adult non-smokers. Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Mar;20(1):121–125. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Danuser B., Weber A., Hartmann A. L., Krueger H. Effects of a bronchoprovocation challenge test with cigarette sidestream smoke on sensitive and healthy adults. Chest. 1993 Feb;103(2):353–358. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.2.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehrlichman H., Brown S., Zhu J., Warrenburg S. Startle reflex modulation during exposure to pleasant and unpleasant odors. Psychophysiology. 1995 Mar;32(2):150–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ehrlichman H., Kuhl S. B., Zhu J., Warrenburg S. Startle reflex modulation by pleasant and unpleasant odors in a between-subjects design. Psychophysiology. 1997 Nov;34(6):726–729. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02149.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huber G., Hangartner M., Gierer R. Sensorische Geruchsmessung. Soz Praventivmed. 1981 Jul;26(3):179–182. doi: 10.1007/BF02081385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkins R. A., Counts R. W. Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: results of two personal exposure studies. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107 (Suppl 2):341–348. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s2341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Junker M., Koller T., Monn C. An assessment of indoor air contaminants in buildings with recreational activity. Sci Total Environ. 2000 Feb 10;246(2-3):139–152. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00452-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Junker M., Koller T., Monn C. An assessment of indoor air contaminants in buildings with recreational activity. Sci Total Environ. 2000 Feb 10;246(2-3):139–152. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00452-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jörres R., Magnussen H. Influence of short-term passive smoking on symptoms, lung mechanics and airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects and healthy controls. Eur Respir J. 1992 Sep;5(8):936–944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lang P. J., Bradley M. M., Cuthbert B. N. Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):377–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miltner W., Matjak M., Braun C., Diekmann H., Brody S. Emotional qualities of odors and their influence on the startle reflex in humans. Psychophysiology. 1994 Jan;31(1):107–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Muramatsu T., Weber A., Muramatsu S., Akermann F. An experimental study on irritation and annoyance due to passive smoking. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1983;51(4):305–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00378343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nowak D., Jörres R., Schmidt A., Magnussen H. Effect of 3 hours' passive smoke exposure in the evening on airway tone and responsiveness until next morning. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1997;69(2):125–133. doi: 10.1007/s004200050126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oglesby L., Künzli N., Rösli M., Braun-Fahrländer C., Mathys P., Stern W., Jantunen M., Kousa A. Validity of ambient levels of fine particles as surrogate for personal exposure to outdoor air pollution--results of the European EXPOLIS-EAS Study (Swiss Center Basel). J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Jul;50(7):1251–1261. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Repace J. L., Lowrey A. H. Indoor air pollution, tobacco smoke, and public health. Science. 1980 May 2;208(4443):464–472. doi: 10.1126/science.7367873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schicatano E. J., Blumenthal T. D. The effects of caffeine and directed attention on acoustic startle habituation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998 Jan;59(1):145–150. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00384-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Warren D. W., Walker J. C., Drake A. F., Lutz R. W. Effects of odorants and irritants on respiratory behavior. Laryngoscope. 1994 May;104(5 Pt 1):623–626. doi: 10.1002/lary.5541040517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weber A. Irritating and annoying effects of passive smoking. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1985 Aug;10(4):341–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Winneke G. Structure and determinants of psychophysiological response to odorant/irritant air pollution. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992 Apr 30;641:261–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb16548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES