Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Oct;109(10):1053–1061. doi: 10.1289/ehp.011091053

Gaseous pollutants in particulate matter epidemiology: confounders or surrogates?

J A Sarnat 1, J Schwartz 1, P J Catalano 1, H H Suh 1
PMCID: PMC1242083  PMID: 11675271

Abstract

Air pollution epidemiologic studies use ambient pollutant concentrations as surrogates of personal exposure. Strong correlations among numerous ambient pollutant concentrations, however, have made it difficult to determine the relative contribution of each pollutant to a given health outcome and have led to criticism that health effect estimates for particulate matter may be biased due to confounding. In the current study we used data collected from a multipollutant exposure study conducted in Baltimore, Maryland, during both the summer and winter to address the potential for confounding further. Twenty-four-hour personal exposures and corresponding ambient concentrations to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide were measured for 56 subjects. Results from correlation and regression analyses showed that personal PM(2.5) and gaseous air pollutant exposures were generally not correlated, as only 9 of the 178 individual-specific pairwise correlations were significant. Similarly, ambient concentrations were not associated with their corresponding personal exposures for any of the pollutants, except for PM(2.5), which had significant associations during both seasons (p < 0.0001). Ambient gaseous concentrations were, however, strongly associated with personal PM(2.5) exposures. The strongest associations were shown between ambient O(3) and personal PM(2.5) (p < 0.0001 during both seasons). These results indicate that ambient PM(2.5) concentrations are suitable surrogates for personal PM(2.5) exposures and that ambient gaseous concentrations are surrogates, as opposed to confounders, of PM(2.5). These findings suggest that the use of multiple pollutant models in epidemiologic studies of PM(2.5) may not be suitable and that health effects attributed to the ambient gases may actually be a result of exposures to PM(2.5).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (572.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alm S., Mukala K., Pasanen P., Tiittanen P., Ruuskanen J., Tuomisto J., Jantunen M. J. Personal NO2 exposures of preschool children in Helsinki. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1998 Jan-Mar;8(1):79–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burnett R. T., Brook J. R., Yung W. T., Dales R. E., Krewski D. Association between ozone and hospitalization for respiratory diseases in 16 Canadian cities. Environ Res. 1997 Jan;72(1):24–31. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1996.3685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang L. T., Koutrakis P., Catalano P. J., Suh H. H. Hourly personal exposures to fine particles and gaseous pollutants--results from Baltimore, Maryland. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Jul;50(7):1223–1235. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen C., Chock D. P., Winkler S. L. A simulation study of confounding in generalized linear models for air pollution epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Mar;107(3):217–222. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke R. W., Coull B., Reinisch U., Catalano P., Killingsworth C. R., Koutrakis P., Kavouras I., Murthy G. G., Lawrence J., Lovett E. Inhaled concentrated ambient particles are associated with hematologic and bronchoalveolar lavage changes in canines. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Dec;108(12):1179–1187. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairley D. Daily mortality and air pollution in Santa Clara County, California: 1989-1996. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Aug;107(8):637–641. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Janssen N. A., Hoek G., Brunekreef B., Harssema H., Mensink I., Zuidhof A. Personal sampling of particles in adults: relation among personal, indoor, and outdoor air concentrations. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Mar 15;147(6):537–547. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Levy J. I., Lee K., Spengler J. D., Yanagisawa Y. Impact of residential nitrogen dioxide exposure on personal exposure: an international study. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1998 Jun;48(6):553–560. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1998.10463704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lipfert F. W., Wyzga R. E. Statistical considerations in determining the health significance of constituents of airborne particulate matter. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1999 Sep;49(9 Spec No):182–191. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu L. J., Delfino R., Koutrakis P. Ozone exposure assessment in a southern California community. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Jan;105(1):58–65. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9710558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Long C. M., Suh H. H., Koutrakis P. Characterization of indoor particle sources using continuous mass and size monitors. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Jul;50(7):1236–1250. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Samet J. M., Dominici F., Curriero F. C., Coursac I., Zeger S. L. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 14;343(24):1742–1749. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012143432401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sarnat J. A., Koutrakis P., Suh H. H. Assessing the relationship between personal particulate and gaseous exposures of senior citizens living in Baltimore, MD. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Jul;50(7):1184–1198. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schwartz J. Assessing confounding, effect modification, and thresholds in the association between ambient particles and daily deaths. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108(6):563–568. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schwartz J., Norris G., Larson T., Sheppard L., Claiborne C., Koenig J. Episodes of high coarse particle concentrations are not associated with increased mortality. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107(5):339–342. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES