ABSTRACT
Background
The cerebral circulation is continuously challenged by intravascular micrometer‐sized particles that become trapped microvascular‐emboli. These particles may include micro‐thrombi, stiffened erythrocytes, and leukocytes, while also fat particles, air, and microplastics may cause microvascular embolism.
Review Scope
In this narrative review, we discuss these embolization processes and their acute and chronic consequences. These relate to the local flow interruption as well as the direct interaction with the endothelium. In addition, we address the clearing processes, including local thrombolysis and extravasation, or angiophagy, of the emboli.
Conclusion
A continuous balance exists between embolic events and their resolution under normal conditions. Increased micro‐embolic rates, as occur in e.g., atrial fibrillation, or decreased clearing, possibly related to endothelial cell dysfunction, disturb this balance. This could lead to continuing loss of capillaries, micro‐infarcts, and cognitive decline.
Keywords: angiophagy, cerebral ischemia, extravasation, microcirculation, microplastics, stroke, thrombosis
1. Introduction
The microcirculation plays a crucial role in distributing oxygen and nutrients throughout the brain via an intricate network of small arteries, arterioles, and capillaries, followed by venules and veins. In mammals, capillaries typically measure around 5 μm in diameter, facilitating optimal gas and nutrient exchange while allowing the passage of erythrocytes, platelets, and leukocytes under normal physiological conditions. However, abnormalities can arise. Particles larger than capillary diameter can become trapped in the network, obstructing blood flow and oxygen delivery. Although embolism by a large, millimeter‐sized thrombus is relatively rare, its consequence—acute ischemic stroke—can be devastating [1]. Smaller thrombi embolize more distally, potentially with less severe outcomes or even remaining unnoticed (silent brain infarction). Yet their occurrence may be far more frequent. Quantitative data on this topic remain scarce, but substantial amounts of micro‐thrombi are likely to form in chronic conditions like atrial fibrillation (AF) and atherosclerosis, leading to increased embolism in the distal microcirculation, particularly in capillaries (Figure 1) [3, 4].
FIGURE 1.

Sequence of events following micro‐embolization by a range of possible emboli. Depending on embolus type and size and endothelial health, lodging induces a range of processes at the seconds to hours timescale. These processes eventually will lead to either the development and growth of small infarcts or tissue recovery. Created in BioRender [2].
Beyond micro‐thrombi, arterial blood may contain other particles that contribute to microvascular embolisms, including rigid erythrocytes, activated leukocytes, circulating tumor cells, air emboli, and fat emboli from medical procedures (Figure 2). Moreover, growing concerns regarding the health risks associated with nano‐ and microplastics have sparked extensive research into their presence and toxicity in the human body. Microplastics, defined as exceeding 1 μm in diameter, have been detected across various organs and fluids, including blood and the brain [6, 7]. Limited quantitative studies found particles up to 20 μm in the circulation [8]. Due to their persistence and inability to degrade, these particles accumulate in tissues following microvascular entrapment. In the past decade, yearly increasing numbers of plastic particles in the liver and brain have been found in decedent human brains [9, 10].
FIGURE 2.

The cerebral microcirculation is continuously subjected to micro‐emboli. We suggest that under healthy conditions, the event rate is low enough to allow for clearance and local reperfusion. However, this balance is challenged by increased event rates or impaired clearance, both of which may result from cardiovascular health waning. Such a disbalance leads to progressive loss of capillary patency, culminating in silent or overt brain infarcts as well as continuous cognitive decline. Created in BioRender [5].
Irrespective of their origin, capillary microvascular emboli (ME) need to be cleared in order to prevent continuous accumulation (Figure 1). For micro‐thrombi, degradation by plasmin seems to be an expected mechanism, but the sparse available data indicate that degradation and wash‐out rapidly become inefficient after the lodging of the clot [11, 12]. Plastic microparticles cannot be degraded, and capillary recanalization requires alternative processes that are based on active endothelial cell remodeling, including extravasation of the embolus. Remarkably little is known with regard to these processes. Accordingly, the purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of data and thoughts about microvascular obstruction and clearance.
Below, we first discuss the acute events that may cause microvascular embolisms, the nature of ME that can occur in chronic settings, and their consequences, from local tissue ischemia to long‐term organ damage. We then address capillary processing of ME and the current insight into the underlying cellular and molecular processes. We end by discussing the (im‐)balance between capillary embolic events and their resolution. While inflammatory responses and blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption are heavily involved in the consequences of ME, we only briefly touch upon these processes.
2. Micro‐Embolic Events
Below we focus on embolic events in specifically the microcirculation, notably the capillaries with inclusion of arterioles and venules where relevant. Embolic events, notably thrombo‐embolism, may occur in any part of the vascular system, including large arteries and veins. Where relevant, we extrapolate from data on these large vessels.
2.1. Micro‐Thrombi
Micro‐thrombi are small, intravascular aggregates of platelets, fibrin, red blood cells, immune cells, and other coagulation components that occlude distal cerebral microvessels [13]. Due to their small size, it is challenging to detect micro‐thrombi by means of MRI or CT, while these embolisms remain predominantly clinically asymptomatic. However, several studies address the clinical relevance of micro‐thrombi as they can induce silent brain infarctions [14, 15, 16, 17], which occur with increased frequency during aging [18, 19]. Increased occurrence of micro‐thrombi and micro‐infarcts is also seen in chronic diseases like cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) [20, 21], hypertension [22] and diabetes mellitus [23], where they are part of a detrimental loop of cause and consequence.
2.1.1. De Novo Micro‐Thrombi
The composition of micro‐thrombi is highly dependent on the underlying etiology. De novo micro‐thrombi formed in the microcirculation are common in a wide variety of pathologies, including CSVD and secondary injury after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite their differences, both pathologies involve endothelial dysfunction leading to a pro‐thrombotic endothelial phenotype. In CSVD [19, 20, 21, 24], endothelial activation and inflammation caused by chronic vessel wall injury result in (among others) the release of von Willebrand Factor (vWF), tissue factor (TF), P‐selectin, and platelet activator with subsequent micro‐thrombi formation [19, 20, 21, 22]. TBI represents an acute mechanical insult to the brain, leading to secondary injury that includes BBB breakdown and leakage of brain‐derived extracellular vesicles into the circulation. This process activates systemic inflammation and coagulopathy. Beyond chronic and acute insults, de novo micro‐thrombi may also form in response to infectious disease, as exemplified by COVID‐19. SARS‐CoV‐2–induced endothelial activation results in a cytokine storm, neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release, and impaired fibrinolysis—all of which contribute to intravascular thrombosis [25, 26].
2.1.2. Migrating Micro‐Thrombi
In addition to de novo formation, micro‐thrombi may also originate elsewhere and lodge more distally. Two major sources of embolic micro‐thrombi are atherosclerotic plaque rupture and AF. In plaque rupture, mechanical disruption of a vulnerable atherosclerotic lesion—typically in the carotid artery or aortic arch—exposes highly thrombogenic material such as tissue factor, collagen, and lipids [27]. This triggers platelet activation and thrombin generation, resulting in a fibrin‐ and platelet‐rich thrombus [28]. Parts of this thrombus may fragment and enter the bloodstream, leading to distal ME [29]. In AF, blood stasis within the left atrial appendage promotes coagulation and thrombus formation. Upon distal lodging, microinfarcts can develop that are often silent but associated with cognitive impairment and increased stroke risk. While both conditions generate embolic micro‐thrombi, thrombi resulting from AF are typically older, more organized, and richer in fibrin, whereas those derived from plaque rupture are often younger, heterogeneous, and may contain cholesterol crystals or inflammatory cells [27, 30, 31, 32, 33]. Quantitative data on the number of thrombi and their sizes are lacking, but it seems reasonable to assume that the smallest thrombi occur by far the most frequently.
2.1.3. Iatrogenic Micro‐Thrombi
Iatrogenic micro‐thrombi can arise as a consequence of neurovascular interventions, particularly during endovascular treatment like mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion [34, 35]. While mechanical thrombectomy has revolutionized acute ischemic stroke treatment, the procedure itself can inadvertently generate distal ME through fragmentation of the primary thrombus or dislodgement of endothelial or atherosclerotic debris [36, 37]. In larger thrombus fragments or large numbers of microscopic fragments can cause new infarcts following successful recanalization, as can be detected on diffusion‐weighted imaging [38, 39].
Iatrogenic micro‐thrombi may further result from catheter manipulation, contrast injection, or air embolism during diagnostic or therapeutic angiography [40, 41, 42]. To date, there are no direct histological studies characterizing the composition of iatrogenic micro‐thrombi formed during or after mechanical thrombectomy or other interventions. However, indirect evidence from retrieved thrombi suggests that fragments likely consist of fibrin‐ and platelet‐rich material [43, 44, 45].
2.2. Erythrocytes
Red blood cells (RBCs) normally pass the capillary bed by virtue of their flexibility and lack of adhesion proteins at the surface. Experimental stiffening of RBCs by oxidative stress causes their stalling in the microcirculation of the brain and other organs [46]. RBC stiffening occurs in sickle cell disease, contributing to sickle cell crises where the perfusion of the brain and other vital organs is compromised by micro‐occlusions. The process is far more complex than a mere ‘blockage of the capillary sieve’ by RBCs that are too stiff to pass through [47]. Rather, increased cell adhesion in the post‐capillary venules, endothelial inflammation, and expression of adhesion molecules are involved, leading to recruitment of more RBCs, activated leukocytes [48], and platelets, and finally a full micro‐occlusion [49]. Based on in vitro approaches and numerical analyses, Caruso et al. [47] showed that local forces on the endothelial cells are strongly affected by the occlusion, contributing to the endothelial inflammation.
Cerebral malaria involves RBC surface expression of antigens such as Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 that bind to a variety of endothelial receptors and adherence of the RBC to the capillary and venular endothelium. This induces a further cascade of obstructive events as well as prothrombotic and inflammatory responses and damage to the BBB [50]. RBC stiffening and aggregation occur in diabetes [50], and possibly more generally in cardiovascular diseases [51, 52]. Mohaissen et al. [53] showed mutual aggravation between RBC stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in a mouse model. However, to the best of our knowledge, quantitative data on stalling by stiffened RBC or clusters of RBC in the brain are lacking.
2.3. Fat Particles
Since cerebral fat embolism (CFE) is a rare clinical condition, data are scarce, specific risk factors are unclear, and the pathophysiological mechanisms involved are still poorly elucidated [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59]. Moreover, no universal diagnostic criteria are defined [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59]. CFE develops through complex processes that are historically explained by two key theories: The “mechanical theory” describes the occurrence of fat emboli as a result of injury to adipose tissue in bone marrow, often following trauma or orthopedic surgery. Due to the occurrence of increased intramedullary pressure, fat particles enter the blood circulation. Within this theory, for cerebral involvement, fat globules must be small (< 10 μm) and numerous, as larger particles are filtered out by the lungs unless there is a right‐to‐left shunt (e.g., patent foramen ovale or intrapulmonary shunt), which allows access to the brain [57, 59, 60, 61]. The second “(bio)chemical theory” describes the massive release of plasma mediators (hormones), stimulating lipolysis in tissue after trauma, surgery, or certain nontraumatic diseases. This process causes the release of free fatty acids and other metabolites (prostaglandins, leukotrienes) into the circulation, causing local inflammation in the microvasculature and the formation of fat droplets [62, 63]. Neurological injury due to CFE results not only from physical vessel blockage but also from the toxic effects of these fatty acids.
CFE lacks a widely accepted diagnostic definition, and diagnosis relies heavily on clinical suspicion due to the absence of validated criteria [55, 56, 57, 58]. The neurological symptoms of CFE—ranging from headache and confusion to seizures and coma—are more variable and nonspecific than the respiratory symptoms seen in fat embolism syndrome, making diagnosis challenging. MRI is the most informative diagnostic tool, revealing multiple characteristics described across acute, subacute, and late stages, reflecting the dynamic pathological changes of CFE. These include white matter damage (atrophy or demyelination), edema (cytotoxic or vasogenic), and petechial hemorrhage [54, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68].
2.4. Gas Emboli
Gas emboli, also known as cerebral arterial gas embolism (CAGE), can block cerebral micro‐vessels with serious, potentially fatal consequences. CAGE can occur as a result of pulmonary barotrauma related to diving or during certain invasive medical procedures such as cardiac surgery, lung surgery, and endovascular procedures [69, 70]. A recent study found that 16% of patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke had linear air bubbles visible on post‐procedure cerebral CT scans [71]. These larger, linear air emboli—distinct from smaller, spherical bubbles—were associated with worse short‐ and long‐term clinical outcomes compared to patients without such findings.
The pathophysiology of CAGE and bubble reabsorption and clearance rate depends on the size, location within the cerebral circulation, blood flow, gas composition, and treatment measures [72]. Gas emboli generally dissolve within minutes to a few hours, depending on the bubble's gas‐exchange area [73]. This results in a gradual decrease in size, to eventually be flushed out via the venous circulation [74]. Larger, elongated bubbles are more likely to become lodged, causing prolonged occlusion (up to several hours) and primary ischemic injury in the affected brain areas [75]. Smaller, spherical bubbles may pass through the vascular bed more quickly or be more rapidly reabsorbed [76]. Adhesion between bubbles and vessel walls may involve interactions between endothelial surface elements and plasma proteins adsorbed on the bubble [77]. Even brief contact with these gas emboli can damage the vascular endothelium by disrupting the glycocalyx and irritating the endothelial cells [77]. This endothelial injury triggers activation and inflammation, disrupts the BBB, and promotes cerebral edema and pro‐thrombotic processes, potentially leading to secondary ischemic injury even after the bubbles have cleared [78, 79].
2.5. Leukocytes
Leukocyte entrapment is a recognized phenomenon that can contribute to microvascular occlusion and embolization [80]. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) reductions or even stalling due to leukocyte entrapment have been linked both as cause and consequence to chronic (vascular) diseases, including hypercholesterolemia [80] and Alzheimer's Disease [80, 81], as well as to ischemic stroke and other acute insults [82, 83, 84].
In acute events, leukocytes are rapidly recruited into the cerebral microcirculation (hours). In this setting, neutrophils are the primary leukocytes adhering to the vessel wall (via specific adhesion molecules on the endothelial cells, e.g., ICAM‐1, VCAM‐1) [84, 85], whereafter (> 24 h) other leukocyte populations become more prominent in these adhesive interactions [86]. The accumulation of rolling and adherent leukocytes is accompanied by platelet recruitment. Activated neutrophils may aggregate with these platelets and produce Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) [87], again increasing cellular accumulation by forming a scaffold [26, 88, 89]. This eventually will physically obstruct the microvessel and may amplify the reduced or stalled blood flow in already affected tissue.
Leukocyte entrapment mechanisms involve both adhesive interactions and physical properties of leukocytes. Inflammatory mediators upregulate endothelial adhesion molecules, promoting leukocyte binding and subsequent sequestration within capillaries. Additionally, changes in leukocyte stiffness—modulated by hormones or cytokines—can influence margination (adherence to vessel walls) and demargination (release into circulation), potentially affecting the likelihood of entrapment [90]. Stiffer leukocytes may be more prone to becoming lodged in narrow vessels, especially in inflamed or injured brain tissue where endothelial activation is heightened.
2.6. Microplastics and Other Extrinsic Particles
Plastic nano‐particles are widely detected in the environment and are capable of entering the human body through the lungs, gastrointestinal tract [91] or skin and passing the BBB [92], possibly providing a health risk due to their toxicity. Of relevance for the current review is whether such particles can be large enough to become trapped in the microcirculation. Data on numbers and size distribution of plastic and other extrinsic particles in the blood is very sparse. Leslie et al. [93] reported detectable plastic particles of at least 0.7 μm in diameter in the blood, totaling 7.1 μg/mL. Their methods do not allow for the determination of particle size distribution. Other studies that did include particle size distribution showed that particles ranging in size from 1.4 to 57 μm can be detected in human whole blood [94], placenta [94], urine [95] and atheromatous plaques from carotid arteries [7, 96]. These extrinsic particles are sufficiently large to cause embolization [97], and there is no literature indicating that microplastics can dissolve intravascularly. It is therefore expected that trapped plastic particles may contribute to prolonged blood flow disturbances prior to clearance.
Micro‐ and nano‐plastics induce endothelial dysfunction in vitro by causing upregulation of adhesion molecules VCAM‐1 and ICAM‐1. In vivo, this would lead to enhanced recruitment and adhesion of leukocytes, oxidative stress, and pro‐inflammatory cytokine expression (IL‐1β and TNF‐α) [98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103]. Additionally, microplastics can enhance thrombus formation by absorption of plasma proteins such as coagulation factor XII and plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 [104, 105], underscoring the potential importance of micro‐plastics in the development of thrombosis.
3. Acute Consequences of Microvascular Embolization
The extensive cascade of pathological processes activated upon ME lodging starts with flow impairment (Figure 2). Additional processes might be initiated by the direct physical forces, hypoxia and hypoglycemia, and biological interaction with the endothelial cells. A brief overview can be found in Figure 3. The biological interactions may be extrapolated from in vitro and in vivo experiments, as indicated above for microplastics. There is a wealth of data here, which we do not discuss but which is extensively reviewed elsewhere [107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114]. Mechanical interactions are more difficult to extrapolate from in vitro data. However, it is quite conceivable that a lodged ME exerts a large shear force on the endothelial cells. This is because wall shear stress is proportional to the pressure gradient. This gradient is very steep, as upstream pressure is increased and downstream pressure is decreased when a ME blocks flow. While initial computational approaches support this (data not shown), a more thorough mechanical analysis is needed to substantiate this point.
FIGURE 3.

Brief summary of the biochemical signaling pathways upon embolization at the apical side of the endothelial cells. Pathways are activated due to alteration in mechanical forces and high pressure gradients, hypoxia and hypoglycemia and due to direct embolus‐endothelial interaction. ATP, adenosine triphosphate; Ca2+, calcium; Cldn5, Claudin‐5; ET‐1, Endothelin‐1; HiF1α, Hypoxia‐inducible factor 1 α; ICAM‐1, Intercellular adhesion molecule 1; JAMs, junctional adhesion molecules; Occl, Occludin; PECAM‐1, platelet and endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1; PIEZO‐1, large mechanosensitive ion channel protein; ROS, reactive oxygen species; S1PR1, sphingosine‐1‐phosphate receptor 1; TF, tissue factor; TGFRs, Transforming Growth Factor Receptors; TIE‐2, tyrosine kinase receptor (also known as TEK); TRPs, mechanosensitive transient receptor potential ion channels; VCAM‐1, vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1; VEcad, vascular endothelial cadherin; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; vWF, von Willebrand Factor; ZO‐1, zonula occludens 1. Created in BioRender [106].
3.1. Flow Disruption
Penetrating arterioles are particularly vulnerable to flow impairment due to the lack of collateral pathways [115]. Occlusions in single penetrating arterioles (5–25 μm) or venules (20–100 μm) were shown to cause columns of tissue infarction with diameters around 500 μm and specific cognitive deficits [116]. Obstructions of larger vessels in the more proximal pial circulation in this model have fewer consequences due to the arcading nature of this part of the brain circulation [117]. A single ME lodging in the more distal bed of arterioles and capillaries branching off the penetrators is expected to have less acute effects because of the limited downstream tissue volume, diffusion of oxygen from other locations, and the alternative perfusion pathways present in the capillary plexus. Clearly, if sufficient numbers of ME lodge, perfusion and oxygenation would become impaired (Figure 1).
The consequences of micro‐embolization are a complex function of the number and size distribution of the particles. Georgakopoulou et al. injected polystyrene microparticles (MP) of 15–50 μm in diameter in the rat carotid artery and quantified the effect on ischemia, hypoxia, and infarction [118]. We fitted an allometric relation to their data and found the total ischemic volume to be proportional to the number of microparticles and the third power of the particle diameter. Individual particles of 15 or 25 μm impair capillary perfusion but do not cause infarction, in contrast to 50 μm particles. However, occasional infarcts are found in areas where multiple small MP lodge [118]. A further quantitative spatial analysis of tissue damage in this model revealed that a mixture of 15–50 μm MP causes numerous hypoxic regions after 24 h, whose volume and distance from the trapped MP were highly stochastic. MP trapping increased the risk for hypoxia in regions up to 1.5 mm away from the MP, and the risk for hypoxia was strongly amplified by the trapping of multiple MPs in the vicinity [119].
The above mentioned details all originate from rodent experiments. Data from humans is lacking. However, Xue et al. [17] simulated lodging of 25 μm ME in penetrating arterioles in a previously validated branching model for the human cortical columns. These simulations predict hypoxic regions downstream of the occlusion site that are comparable to experimental data on rats reported in the same study [17].
3.2. Local Consequences of Flow Disruption
Interruption of local oxygen and nutrient delivery leads to sudden cellular metabolic disruption, ATP depletion, and impaired ion pump function, disturbing calcium, sodium, and potassium gradients (Figure 3). This results in excitotoxicity, cytotoxic edema, and oxidative stress, including the production of cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) [105, 120, 121]. The disrupted calcium homeostasis also provokes dysregulated constriction, increasing microvascular resistance and worsening hypoxia [122].
The sequential endothelial dysfunction, driven by lower cAMP, increases vascular permeability and BBB leakage. The endothelium under stress also activates platelets via integrin‐mediated endothelial interaction [123], which further consolidates the embolus with persistent ischemia as a result.
Ischemic stress also triggers transcriptional reprogramming—suppressing oxygen‐sensing enzymes and activating hypoxia and inflammation pathways mediated by, among others, HIF‐1α and NF‐κB [124]. These changes recruit innate and adaptive immune responses [125, 126], for example via pattern recognition receptors like TLR4 [127]. The inflammatory reaction is controlled by the discharge of ROS, chemokines, and cytokines, which stimulate endothelial adhesion molecules, natural antibodies, and the complement system.
The combination of energy failure, ion imbalance, oxidative stress, and immune activation precipitates various forms of programmed cell death: apoptosis, autophagy‐associated death, necroptosis, and necrosis, each marked by distinct morphological changes [128, 129].
The excessive inflammation during the first days after occlusion forms a detrimental loop of action linked with BBB breakdown and neuronal injury, eventually leading to a worsened outcome [130].
4. Long‐Term Consequences of Microvascular Embolization
Acute experiments on rodents have shown that location, size, and number of microvascular occlusions determine the risk for infarction and, therefore, long‐term consequences [14, 118, 119, 131, 132]. These experiments are primarily relevant for cases where acute ‘showers of ME’ occur, such as in thoracic surgery or mechanical thrombectomy [34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, 42]. MEs in other cases, including AF [27, 30, 31, 32, 33] or the occurrence of microplastics [7, 33, 98, 99], become trapped at a slow but continuous rate, allowing the cerebral circulation to restore perfusion before the next event occurs and so avoiding infarction. These dynamics are therefore a critical determinant of long‐term consequences (Figure 1).
4.1. Vascular Reserve
While single ME may only cause reversible damage, both acute ‘ME showers’ and continuous trapping without adequate removal would be expected to lead to local perfusion deficits and, at a more global level, to impaired vascular reserve.
Vascular reserve refers to the capacity of blood vessels to increase blood flow above the resting level when tissue demand rises—for instance, during exercise or stress. It reflects how well the vasculature can adapt to increased metabolic needs. A healthy vascular reserve would allow at least a doubling of blood flow during increased demand [133]. The brain's vascular reserve can be measured by a vasodilatory stimulus such as CO2 elevation or acetazolamide with imaging by PET, CT/MR perfusion, or transcranial Doppler [133].
Sickle cell anemia forms a clear case where reserve is reduced [134], limiting the metabolic rate [135], very likely as a consequence of the ME. Also in AF, reserve is impaired [136], notably in hypertensives [137]. In other cases, the involvement of ME is less clear. Thus, the impairment of vascular reserve in aging and diabetes [138, 139] could partly relate to micro‐thrombi generated as a consequence of endothelial cell dysfunction and coagulation activation. An intriguing other condition associated with both micro‐thrombosis and impaired vascular reserve is traumatic brain injury [139]. It should be noted that impaired vascular reserve is usually associated with vasoreactivity rather than micro‐occlusions [139, 140, 141]. More direct evidence is therefore needed for the involvement of ME in impaired vascular reserve.
4.2. Cognitive Decline and Vascular Dementia
Vascular dementia is caused by impaired blood flow to specific regions of the brain, leading to tissue damage and progressive cognitive decline [142, 143, 144]. Atherosclerosis and CSVD are disorders that are frequently associated with both vascular dementia and ME formation [145, 146, 147]. The lodging of ME in small cerebral vessels is a major contributor to cerebral hypoperfusion. Disruptions in blood flow may lead to the formation of small infarcts [148, 149]. These small, often asymptomatic ischemic lesions in the white and deep gray matter can significantly increase the risk of dementia [16, 150, 151, 152]. Additionally, transcranial Doppler studies have linked spontaneous cerebral ME to accelerated cognitive decline and the progression of vascular dementia. In rodent models, the lodging of ME in small cerebral vessels reduces cerebral blood flow, leading to hypoxia, infarcts, and brain tissue damage in rats [14, 17, 119]. Overall, these studies support the central hypothesis that ME‐induced ischemia plays a key role in the development and progression of vascular dementia.
5. Clearance of Micro‐Emboli
In order to establish life‐long perfusion, MEs need to be removed from the capillary bed. Below, we discuss the clearance of micro‐thrombi by thrombolysis as well as the transcapillary migration of emboli toward the brain interstitium (Figure 2). In addition, microvascular patency could possibly be re‐established by rarefaction of the blocked capillary [153] and formation of new capillaries by angiogenesis. Angiogenesis in the brain is reviewed elsewhere [154]. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, angiogenesis specifically in response to local emboli has not been studied, and this possibility is not further discussed here.
5.1. Local Thrombolysis
Fibrin‐containing clots in the brain are subjected to digestion by plasmin, which is generated by tissue‐type plasminogen activator (tPA) that is locally produced by the endothelial cells and other cells of the neurovascular unit [155, 156], notably under ischemic conditions [156]. tPA activity is tightly controlled, ensuring efficient local activity at the clot without undesirable systemic effects. Yet, tPA activity can be impaired in several conditions. These include local endothelial dysfunction and elevated Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1) levels as seen in metabolic syndrome and chronic inflammation [156, 157, 158]. While the roles of tPA and PAI‐1 in large arterial and venous thrombosis have been studied extensively, very little quantitative data is available on the lysis efficiency of micro‐thrombi in the brain in either chronic prothrombotic states or acute events such as ischemic stroke. As discussed above, ischemic stroke may cause inflow and local development of micro‐thrombi that overload the thrombolytic processes. Injected micro‐thrombi in a mouse model were found to be resistant to thrombolysis after three hours [11]. This was shown to be related to endothelial protrusions covering the micro‐thrombus. In addition, interaction with leukocytes may also prevent local thrombolysis, as seen in major clots [159]. Preventing such interactions reduces capillary stalls in a stroke model [82]. Therefore, while thrombolysis no doubt is a key process for normal thrombus clearance, it is quite conceivable that in chronic prothrombotic states and acute ischemic events, micro‐thrombi remain trapped in the microcirculation. This concerns native thrombolysis as well as thrombolytic therapy that targets micro‐thrombi [160, 161].
5.2. Extravasation/Angiophagy
A ME that remains lodged in the cerebral vasculature after failed intravascular breakdown can eventually be removed via endothelial transmigration across the BBB, a process also known as angiophagy, which was first described by Grutzendler and colleagues in 2010 [11]. Studies utilizing rodent models have demonstrated that MEs of different compositions undergo angiophagy at varying rates, subsequently entering the brain's parenchyma [11, 12, 132]. For example, exogenously introduced fibrin MEs were cleared within six days, whereas cholesterol crystal emboli extravasated within three to eight days [11, 12]. Analysis of postmortem rodent tissue in a silent brain infarct model revealed that polystyrene MPs of varying sizes can also be extravasated, although this process may take up to 28 days [131, 132]. Despite the relatively slow nature of angiophagy compared to thrombolysis, ischemia and hypoxia caused by MP occlusion in rats are reversible: studies show that functional recovery can occur within 7 days after inducing silent brain infarcts by polystyrene MP, highlighting the existence of repair mechanisms in this time frame. Additionally, Chang et al. [162] demonstrated endothelial phagocytosis of oxidatively stressed RBCs in vitro, and in subsequent in vivo studies, observed that stiffened RBCs stall and extravasate through the BBB in mice, with most extravasation occurring within 24 h [162, 163].
The composition of the ME appears to be a key determinant of extravasation rate: biological emboli such as fibrin and RBCs are cleared more rapidly than synthetic polystyrene MPs. Fibrin emboli, being susceptible to endogenous fibrinolysis, can fragment and thus accelerate their extravasation [11]. In contrast, the smooth surface and lack of protein interactions in polystyrene MPs likely contribute to their slower clearance. Our experimental work with biodegradable particles of different compositions further supports that extravasation rates depend on MP material [131].
Regardless of the composition of the ME, minimal to no protein leakage through the BBB is observed during angiophagy (own preliminary data), although transient micro‐glia activation does occur [11, 12, 131]. Following endothelial transmigration, fibrin MEs and RBCs are efficiently phagocytosed by microglia, whereas cholesterol crystals are engulfed but not fully degraded [11, 46]. Polystyrene MPs larger than 10 μm are typically not phagocytosed by microglia and can persist in the cerebral parenchyma [131, 132]. Phagocytosis of RBCs in particular may lead to the accumulation of interstitial iron, potentially contributing to neuroinflammation and the development of neurodegenerative diseases [164]. Despite multiple studies [11, 46, 131, 132, 162, 163, 164], our understanding of the ultimate fate of MEs after angiophagy remains very limited.
5.3. Balance of Micro‐Embolic Events and Micro‐Embolus Resolution
Above, we have characterized ME (occluding vessels of say 5–50 μm in diameter) as events that may not necessarily lead to acute micro‐infarction but could impair vascular reserve and resilience, increasing the risk of developing vascular dementia. The various clearance processes counteract the build‐up of emboli in the brain, forming a delicate equilibrium (Figure 2). Effects of micro‐occlusions depend on the type of embolus, event rate, size, location, and colocalization of multiple ME, as well as on the acute or chronic nature (colocalization in time) of these events. Clearance may involve several processes, partly depending on the nature and size of the embolus. Both occlusion and clearing can be affected in cardiovascular morbidities. Endothelial dysfunction may lead to increased numbers of circulating micro‐thrombi from atherosclerotic plaques or from a more pro‐thrombotic state. At the same time, this dysfunction may impair clearance, as endothelial cells play key roles in clearing. The picture thus emerges that in healthy individuals, microvascular clearing mechanisms effectively deal with the low rate of microvascular embolisms, but that both an increase in the microvascular event rate and less effective clearing ultimately may cause an imbalance that renders the cerebral circulation more and more vulnerable, eventually contributing to vascular origins of dementia. There is a large paucity of data here, among others on the event and recovery rates and distribution of ME sizes. The evidence supporting the existence of a gradually shifting balance is, at best, circumstantial and limited to specific conditions. In this review, we focused on micro‐thrombi but wanted to include other emboli because of their possible relevance for this balance.
6. Conclusion
The cerebral microcirculation is continuously challenged by micro‐embolic events. Repair mechanisms are needed to maintain adequate local perfusion throughout life. Depending on the nature of the embolus, these mechanisms include fibrinolysis or other intravascular degradation processes but also extravasation, transporting the emboli to the brain interstitium where further degradation occurs. The balance between events and repair requires a healthy endothelium, and endothelial dysfunction could lead to progressive loss of capillaries and functional consequences such as vascular dementia. Finally, non‐degradable microplastics might end up in the brain via such extravasation, inducing neuro‐inflammation and degeneration. There is a substantial lack of quantitative and mechanistic data here, and further research is warranted.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation (03‐006‐2021‐T019 to I.M.). In addition, this study was funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation and The Brain Foundation Netherlands and is conducted in collaboration with and supported by the Dutch CardioVascular Alliance, 01‐002‐2022‐0126 CONTRAST 2.0. In addition, this work was funded in part through unrestricted funding by Stryker, Medtronic and Penumbra. The funding sources were not involved in study design, monitoring, data collection, statistical analyses, interpretation of results, or manuscript writing.
Mol K., Mulder I. A., and van Bavel E., “Micro‐Embolic Events and Their Clearing in the Brain. A Narrative Review,” Acta Physiologica 241, no. 10 (2025): e70098, 10.1111/apha.70098.
Funding: This work was supported by Dutch Heart Foundation (03‐006‐2021‐T019). Dutch Heart Foundation and The Brain Foundation Netherlands and the Dutch CardioVascular Alliance in addition of unrestricted funding by Stryker, Medtronic and Penumbra (01‐002‐2022‐0126 CONTRAST 2.0).
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
- 1. Gupta A., Giambrone A. E., Gialdini G., et al., “Silent Brain Infarction and Risk of Future Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Stroke 47 (2016): 719–725, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kooij G., (2025), https://BioRender.com/hpfbkqr.
- 3. Baradaran H., Gialdini G., Mtui E., Askin G., Kamel H., and Gupta A., “Silent Brain Infarction in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Disease,” Stroke 47 (2016): 1368–1370, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Moroni F., Ammirati E., Magnoni M., et al., “Carotid Atherosclerosis, Silent Ischemic Brain Damage and Brain Atrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” International Journal of Cardiology 223 (2016): 681–687, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kooij G., (2025), https://BioRender.com/d6s2w6o.
- 6. Marfella R. and Prattichizzo F., “Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas. Reply,” New England Journal of Medicine 390 (2024): 1728, 10.1056/NEJMc2404154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Marfella R., Prattichizzo F., Sardu C., et al., “Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and Cardiovascular Events,” New England Journal of Medicine 390 (2024): 900–910, 10.1056/NEJMoa2309822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lee D. W., Jung J., Park S. A., et al., “Microplastic Particles in Human Blood and Their Association With Coagulation Markers,” Scientific Reports 14 (2024): 30419, 10.1038/s41598-024-81931-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nihart A. J., Garcia M. A., El Hayek E., et al., “Author Correction: Bioaccumulation of Microplastics in Decedent Human Brains,” Nature Medicine 31 (2025): 1367, 10.1038/s41591-025-03675-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Nihart A. J., Garcia M. A., El Hayek E., et al., “Bioaccumulation of Microplastics in Decedent Human Brains,” Nature Medicine 31 (2025): 1114–1119, 10.1038/s41591-024-03453-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Grutzendler J., Murikinati S., Hiner B., et al., “Angiophagy Prevents Early Embolus Washout But Recanalizes Microvessels Through Embolus Extravasation,” Science Translational Medicine 6 (2014): 226ra231, 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lam C. K., Yoo T., Hiner B., Liu Z., and Grutzendler J., “Embolus Extravasation Is an Alternative Mechanism for Cerebral Microvascular Recanalization,” Nature 465 (2010): 478–482, 10.1038/nature09001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Topol E. J. and Yadav J. S., “Recognition of the Importance of Embolization in Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease,” Circulation 101 (2000): 570–580, 10.1161/01.cir.101.5.570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Georgakopoulou T., van der Wijk A. E., Bakker E., vanBavel E., and investigators I , “Quantitative 3D Analysis of Tissue Damage in a Rat Model of Microembolization,” Journal of Biomechanics 128 (2021): 110723, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lee S. C., Park S. J., Ki H. K., et al., “Prevalence and Risk Factors of Silent Cerebral Infarction in Apparently Normal Adults,” Hypertension 36 (2000): 73–77, 10.1161/01.hyp.36.1.73-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Vermeer S. E., Koudstaal P. J., Oudkerk M., Hofman A., and Breteler M. M., “Prevalence and Risk Factors of Silent Brain Infarcts in the Population‐Based Rotterdam Scan Study,” Stroke 33 (2002): 21–25, 10.1161/hs0102.101629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Xue Y., Georgakopoulou T., van der Wijk A. E., Jozsa T. I., van Bavel E., and Payne S. J., “Quantification of Hypoxic Regions Distant From Occlusions in Cerebral Penetrating Arteriole Trees,” PLoS Computational Biology 18 (2022): e1010166, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kotani K., Osaki Y., Sakane N., Adachi S., and Ishimaru Y., “Risk Factors for Silent Cerebral Infarction in the Elderly,” Archives of Medical Research 35 (2004): 522–524, 10.1016/j.arcmed.2004.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Csiszar A., Ungvari A., Patai R., et al., “Atherosclerotic Burden and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Exploring the Link Through Microvascular Aging and Cerebral Microhemorrhages,” Geroscience 46 (2024): 5103–5132, 10.1007/s11357-024-01139-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Dupre N., Drieu A., and Joutel A., “Pathophysiology of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Journey Through Recent Discoveries,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 134 (2024): 134, 10.1172/JCI172841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wan S., Dandu C., Han G., et al., “Plasma Inflammatory Biomarkers in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Review,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 29 (2023): 498–515, 10.1111/cns.14047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hernandez‐Diaz Z. M., Pena‐Sanchez M., Gonzalez‐Quevedo Monteagudo A., et al., “Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Associated With Subclinical Vascular Damage Indicators in Asymptomatic Hypertensive Patients,” Behavioral Sciences (Basel) 9 (2019): 9, 10.3390/bs9090091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Xu R. S., “Pathogenesis of Diabetic Cerebral Vascular Disease Complication,” World Journal of Diabetes 6 (2015): 54–66, 10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Best J. G., Jesuthasan A., and Werring D. J., “Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Intracranial Bleeding Risk: Prognostic and Practical Significance,” International Journal of Stroke 18 (2023): 44–52, 10.1177/17474930221106014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Middleton E. A., He X. Y., Denorme F., et al., “Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Contribute to Immunothrombosis in COVID‐19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome,” Blood 136 (2020): 1169–1179, 10.1182/blood.2020007008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wang Y., Mulder I. A., Westendorp W. F., Coutinho J. M., and van de Beek D., “Immunothrombosis in Acute Ischemic Stroke,” Stroke 56 (2025): 553–563, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Maekawa K., Shibata M., Nakajima H., et al., “Cholesterol Crystals in Embolic Debris Are Associated With Postoperative Cerebral Embolism After Carotid Artery Stenting,” Cerebrovascular Diseases 46 (2018): 242–248, 10.1159/000495795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Shi C., Mammadova‐Bach E., Li C., Liu D., and Anders H. J., “Pathophysiology and Targeted Treatment of Cholesterol Crystal Embolism and the Related Thrombotic Angiopathy,” FASEB Journal 37 (2023): e23179, 10.1096/fj.202301316R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kolodgie F. D., Nakazawa G., Sangiorgi G., Ladich E., Burke A. P., and Virmani R., “Pathology of Atherosclerosis and Stenting,” Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 17 (2007): 285–301, 10.1016/j.nic.2007.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bartus K., Litwinowicz R., Natorska J., et al., “Coagulation Factors and Fibrinolytic Activity in the Left Atrial Appendage and Other Heart Chambers in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Is There a Local Intracardiac Prothrombotic State? (HEART‐CLOT Study),” International Journal of Cardiology 301 (2020): 103–107, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kell D. B., Lip G. Y. H., and Pretorius E., “Fibrinaloid Microclots and Atrial Fibrillation,” Biomedicine 12 (2024): 891, 10.3390/biomedicines12040891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Undas A., “Altered Fibrin Clot Properties and Fibrinolysis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Practical Implications,” Europace 22 (2020): 185–194, 10.1093/europace/euz271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wysokinski W. E., Owen W. G., Fass D. N., Patrzalek D. D., Murphy L., and McBane R. D., “Atrial Fibrillation and Thrombosis: Immunohistochemical Differences Between In Situ and Embolized Thrombi,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2 (2004): 1637–1644, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00899.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Broocks G., Meyer L., Kabiri R., et al., “Impact of Intravenous Alteplase on Sub‐Angiographic Emboli in High‐Resolution Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging Following Successful Thrombectomy,” European Radiology 31 (2021): 8228–8235, 10.1007/s00330-021-07980-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kaesmacher J., Kurmann C., Jungi N., et al., “Infarct in New Territory After Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging Study,” Scientific Reports 10 (2020): 8366, 10.1038/s41598-020-64495-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Boodt N., van Schauburg P. R. W. S., Hund H. M., et al., “Mechanical Characterization of Thrombi Retrieved With Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke,” Stroke 52 (2021): 2510–2517, 10.1161/Strokeaha.120.033527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kaesmacher J., Boeckh‐Behrens T., Simon S., et al., “Risk of Thrombus Fragmentation During Endovascular Stroke Treatment,” AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 38 (2017): 991–998, 10.3174/ajnr.A5105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Clouser K. D., Culver C. M., and Gert B., “Malady: A New Treatment of Disease,” Hastings Center Report 11 (1981): 29–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Schonfeld M. H., Kabiri R., Kniep H. C., et al., “Sub‐Angiographic Peripheral Emboli in High Resolution DWI After Endovascular Recanalization,” Journal of Neurology 267 (2020): 1401–1406, 10.1007/s00415-020-09719-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Akeel R., Fernandes C. P., and Vassilakos N., “Masticatory Efficiency of Patients Treated With Implant Retained Fixed Bridges in the Upper Jaw Over a 2‐Year Period,” European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 1 (1993): 131–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Chapman B. E. and Brannock J. C., “Proposed Model of Lesbian Identity Development: An Empirical Examination,” Journal of Homosexuality 14 (1987): 69–80, 10.1300/J082v14n03_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Haines D. E., Stewart M. T., Barka N. D., et al., “Microembolism and Catheter Ablation II: Effects of Cerebral Microemboli Injection in a Canine Model,” Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 6 (2013): 23–30, 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.973461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Dohle E., Ashok A. H., Bhakta S., Induruwa I., and Evans N. R., “Thrombus Composition in Ischaemic Stroke: Histological and Radiological Evaluation, and Implications for Acute Clinical Management,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 58 (2025): 355–369, 10.1007/s11239-025-03074-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hashimoto T., Hayakawa M., Funatsu N., et al., “Histopathologic Analysis of Retrieved Thrombi Associated With Successful Reperfusion After Acute Stroke Thrombectomy,” Stroke 47 (2016): 3035–3037, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Staessens S., Francois O., Desender L., et al., “Detailed Histological Analysis of a Thrombectomy‐Resistant Ischemic Stroke Thrombus: A Case Report,” Thrombosis Journal 19 (2021): 11, 10.1186/s12959-021-00262-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zhang H., Sumbria R. K., Chang R., et al., “Erythrocyte‐Brain Endothelial Interactions Induce Microglial Responses and Cerebral Microhemorrhages In Vivo,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 20 (2023): 265, 10.1186/s12974-023-02932-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Caruso C., Cheng X., Michaud M. E., et al., “Less‐Deformable Erythrocyte Subpopulations Biomechanically Induce Endothelial Inflammation in Sickle Cell Disease,” Blood 144 (2024): 2050–2062, 10.1182/blood.2024024608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Turhan A., Weiss L. A., Mohandas N., Coller B. S., and Frenette P. S., “Primary Role for Adherent Leukocytes in Sickle Cell Vascular Occlusion: A New Paradigm,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 (2002): 3047–3051, 10.1073/pnas.052522799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Manwani D. and Frenette P. S., “Vaso‐Occlusion in Sickle Cell Disease: Pathophysiology and Novel Targeted Therapies,” Blood 122 (2013): 3892–3898, 10.1182/blood-2013-05-498311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Wassmer S. C., de Koning‐Ward T. F., Grau G. E. R., and Pai S., “Unravelling Mysteries at the Perivascular Space: A New Rationale for Cerebral Malaria Pathogenesis,” Trends in Parasitology 40 (2024): 28–44, 10.1016/j.pt.2023.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Di Santo R., Niccolini B., Rizzi A., et al., “Sensing Biomechanical Alterations in Red Blood Cells of Type 1 Diabetes Patients: Potential Markers for Microvascular Complications,” Biosensors‐Basel 14 (2024): 14, 10.3390/bios14120587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Wang Y., Yang P., Yan Z., et al., “The Relationship Between Erythrocytes and Diabetes Mellitus,” Journal Diabetes Research 2021 (2021): 6656062, 10.1155/2021/6656062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Mohaissen T., Proniewski B., Targosz‐Korecka M., et al., “Temporal Relationship Between Systemic Endothelial Dysfunction and Alterations in Erythrocyte Function in a Murine Model of Chronic Heart Failure,” Cardiovascular Research 118 (2022): 2610–2624, 10.1093/cvr/cvab306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Godoy D. A., Di Napoli M., and Rabinstein A. A., “Cerebral Fat Embolism: Recognition, Complications, and Prognosis,” Neurocritical Care 29 (2018): 358–365, 10.1007/s12028-017-0463-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Aman J., van Koppenhagen L., Am S., van der Hoeven J. G., and van der Lely A. J., “Cerebral Fat Embolism After Bone Fractures,” Lancet 386 (2015): e16, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Jacobson D. M., Terrence C. F., and Reinmuth O. M., “The Neurologic Manifestations of Fat Embolism,” Neurology 36 (1986): 847–851, 10.1212/wnl.36.6.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Kellogg R. G., Fontes R. B., and Lopes D. K., “Massive Cerebral Involvement in Fat Embolism Syndrome and Intracranial Pressure Management,” Journal of Neurosurgery 119 (2013): 1263–1270, 10.3171/2013.7.JNS13363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Mijalski C., Lovett A., Mahajan R., Sundararajan S., Silverman S., and Feske S., “Cerebral Fat Embolism: A Case of Rapid‐Onset Coma,” Stroke 46 (2015): e251–e253, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Shaikh N., “Emergency Management of Fat Embolism Syndrome,” Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock 2 (2009): 29–33, 10.4103/0974-2700.44680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kamenar E. and Burger P. C., “Cerebral Fat Embolism: A Neuropathological Study of a Microembolic State,” Stroke 11 (1980): 477–484, 10.1161/01.str.11.5.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Lee S. C., Yoon J. Y., Nam C. H., Kim T. K., Jung K. A., and Lee D. W., “Cerebral Fat Embolism Syndrome After Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series,” Journal of Arthroplasty 27 (2012): 409–414, 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Baker P. L., Pazell J. A., and Peltier L. F., “Free Fatty Acids, Catecholamines, and Arterial Hypoxia in Patients With Fat Embolism,” Journal of Trauma 11 (1971): 1026–1030, 10.1097/00005373-197112000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Nastanski F., Gordon W. I., and Lekawa M. E., “Posttraumatic Paradoxical Fat Embolism to the Brain: A Case Report,” Journal of Trauma 58 (2005): 372–374, 10.1097/01.ta.0000108996.10785.0b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Algahtani H. A., Shirah B. H., Abdelghaffar N., Alahmari F., Alhadi W., and Alqahtani S. A., “Cerebral Fat Embolism Syndrome: Diagnostic Challenges and Catastrophic Outcomes: A Case Series,” Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science 40 (2023): 207–211, 10.12701/jyms.2022.00360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Eguia P., Medina A., Garcia‐Monco J. C., Martin V., and Monton F. I., “The Value of Diffusion‐Weighted MRI in the Diagnosis of Cerebral Fat Embolism,” Journal of Neuroimaging 17 (2007): 78–80, 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Kanda N., Miyake T., Okada H., et al., “Prospective Study Examining the Probability of Cerebral Fat Embolism Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Heliyon 9 (2023): e14073, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Parizel P. M., Demey H. E., Veeckmans G., et al., “Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Fat Embolism Syndrome by Diffusion‐Weighted MRI (Starfield Pattern),” Stroke 32 (2001): 2942–2944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Suh S. I., Seol H. Y., Seo W. K., and Koh S. B., “Cerebral Fat Embolism: Susceptibility‐Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Archives of Neurology 66 (2009): 1170, 10.1001/archneurol.2009.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Hatling D., Hogset A., Guttormsen A. B., and Muller B., “Iatrogenic Cerebral Gas Embolism‐A Systematic Review of Case Reports,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 63 (2019): 154–160, 10.1111/aas.13260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Mitchell S. J., Bennett M. H., and Moon R. E., “Decompression Sickness and Arterial Gas Embolism,” New England Journal of Medicine 386 (2022): 1254–1264, 10.1056/NEJMra2116554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Huijberts I., Pinckaers F. M. E., van Zwam W. H., Boogaarts H. D., van Oostenbrugge R. J., and Postma A. A., “Cerebral Arterial Air Emboli on Immediate Post‐Endovascular Treatment CT Are Associated With Poor Short‐ and Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients,” Journal of Neuroradiology 50 (2023): 530–536, 10.1016/j.neurad.2023.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. van Hulst R. A., Klein J., and Lachmann B., “Gas Embolism: Pathophysiology and Treatment,” Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging 23 (2003): 237–246, 10.1046/j.1475-097x.2003.00505.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Yang W. J., Echigo R., Wotton D. R., and Hwang J. B., “Experimental Studies of the Dissolution of Gas Bubbles in Whole Blood and Plasma. I. Stationary Bubbles,” Journal of Biomechanics 4 (1971): 275–281, 10.1016/0021-9290(71)90033-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Li Z., Li G., Li Y., Chen Y., Li J., and Chen H., “Flow Field Around Bubbles on Formation of Air Embolism in Small Vessels,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (2021): 118, 10.1073/pnas.2025406118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Hague J. P., Banahan C., and Chung E. M., “Modelling of Impaired Cerebral Blood Flow due to Gaseous Emboli,” Physics in Medicine and Biology 58, no. 13 (2013): 4381–4394, 10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/4381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Dexter F. and Hindman B. J., “Recommendations for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy of Cerebral Air Embolism Based on a Mathematical Model of Bubble Absorption,” Anesthesia and Analgesia 84 (1997): 1203–1207, 10.1097/00000539-199706000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Eckmann D. M. and Lomivorotov V. N., “Microvascular Gas Embolization Clearance Following Perfluorocarbon Administration,” Journal of Applied Physiology (1985) 94 (2003): 860–868, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00719.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Marsh P. L., Moore E. E., Moore H. B., et al., “Iatrogenic Air Embolism: Pathoanatomy, Thromboinflammation, Endotheliopathy, and Therapies,” Frontiers in Immunology 14 (2023): 1230049, 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1230049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Mitchell S. J., “Decompression Illness: A Comprehensive Overview,” Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 54 (2024): 1–53, 10.28920/dhm54.1.suppl.1-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Cruz Hernandez J. C., Bracko O., Kersbergen C. J., et al., “Neutrophil Adhesion in Brain Capillaries Reduces Cortical Blood Flow and Impairs Memory Function in Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Models,” Nature Neuroscience 22 (2019): 413–420, 10.1038/s41593-018-0329-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Ishikawa M., Stokes K. Y., Zhang J. H., Nanda A., and Granger D. N., “Cerebral Microvascular Responses to Hypercholesterolemia: Roles of NADPH Oxidase and P‐Selectin,” Circulation Research 94 (2004): 239–244, 10.1161/01.RES.0000111524.05779.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. El Amki M., Gluck C., Binder N., et al., “Neutrophils Obstructing Brain Capillaries Are a Major Cause of no‐Reflow in Ischemic Stroke,” Cell Reports 33 (2020): 108260, 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Erdener S. E., Tang J., Kilic K., et al., “Dynamic Capillary Stalls in Reperfused Ischemic Penumbra Contribute to Injury: A Hyperacute Role for Neutrophils in Persistent Traffic Jams,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 41 (2021): 236–252, 10.1177/0271678X20914179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Yilmaz G. and Granger D. N., “Leukocyte Recruitment and Ischemic Brain Injury,” Neuromolecular Medicine 12 (2010): 193–204, 10.1007/s12017-009-8074-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Yang C., Hawkins K. E., Dore S., and Candelario‐Jalil E., “Neuroinflammatory Mechanisms of Blood‐Brain Barrier Damage in Ischemic Stroke,” American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 316 (2019): C135–C153, 10.1152/ajpcell.00136.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Barone F. C., Hillegass L. M., Tzimas M. N., et al., “Time‐Related Changes in Myeloperoxidase Activity and Leukotriene B4 Receptor Binding Reflect Leukocyte Influx in Cerebral Focal Stroke,” Molecular and Chemical Neuropathology 24 (1995): 13–30, 10.1007/BF03160109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Li N., Ji Q., and Hjemdahl P., “Platelet‐Lymphocyte Conjugation Differs Between Lymphocyte Subpopulations,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 4 (2006): 874–881, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Dhanesha N., Patel R. B., Doddapattar P., et al., “PKM2 Promotes Neutrophil Activation and Cerebral Thromboinflammation: Therapeutic Implications for Ischemic Stroke,” Blood 139 (2022): 1234–1245, 10.1182/blood.2021012322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Laridan E., Denorme F., Desender L., et al., “Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Ischemic Stroke Thrombi,” Annals of Neurology 82 (2017): 223–232, 10.1002/ana.24993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Fay M. E., Myers D. R., Kumar A., et al., “Cellular Softening Mediates Leukocyte Demargination and Trafficking, Thereby Increasing Clinical Blood Counts,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (2016): 1987–1992, 10.1073/pnas.1508920113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Paul M. B., Stock V., Cara‐Carmona J., et al., “Micro‐ and Nanoplastics ‐ Current State of Knowledge With the Focus on Oral Uptake and Toxicity,” Nanoscale Advances 2 (2020): 4350–4367, 10.1039/d0na00539h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Cho Y., Seo E. U., Hwang K. S., Kim H., Choi J., and Kim H. N., “Evaluation of Size‐Dependent Uptake, Transport and Cytotoxicity of Polystyrene Microplastic in a Blood‐Brain Barrier (BBB) Model,” Nano Convergence 11 (2024): 40, 10.1186/s40580-024-00448-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Leslie H. A., van Velzen M. J. M., Brandsma S. H., Vethaak A. D., Garcia‐Vallejo J. J., and Lamoree M. H., “Discovery and Quantification of Plastic Particle Pollution in Human Blood,” Environment International 163 (2022): 107199, 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Guan Q., Jiang J., Huang Y., et al., “The Landscape of Micron‐Scale Particles Including Microplastics in Human Enclosed Body Fluids,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 442 (2023): 130138, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Ragusa A., Svelato A., Santacroce C., et al., “Plasticenta: First Evidence of Microplastics in Human Placenta,” Environment International 146 (2021): 106274, 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Liu S., Wang C., Yang Y., et al., “Microplastics in Three Types of Human Arteries Detected by Pyrolysis‐Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Py‐GC/MS),” Journal of Hazardous Materials 469 (2024): 133855, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Tsukada N., Katsumata M., Oki K., et al., “Diameter of Fluorescent Microspheres Determines Their Distribution Throughout the Cortical Watershed Area in Mice,” Brain Research 1679 (2018): 109–115, 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Chen J., Qi R., Cheng Y., Wang L., and Cao X., “Effects of micro/Nanoplastics on Oxidative Damage and Serum Biochemical Parameters in Rats and Mice: A Meta‐Analysis,” Environmental Geochemistry and Health 46 (2024): 197, 10.1007/s10653-024-01972-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Panizzolo M., Martins V. H., Ghelli F., et al., “Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Genotoxicity to Assess Exposure to Micro‐ and Nanoplastics. A Literature Review,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 267 (2023): 115645, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Vlacil A. K., Bänfer S., Jacob R., et al., “Polystyrene Microplastic Particles Induce Endothelial Activation,” PLoS One 16 (2021): e0260181, 10.1371/journal.pone.0260181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Prattichizzo F., Ceriello A., Pellegrini V., et al., “Micro‐Nanoplastics and Cardiovascular Diseases: Evidence and Perspectives,” European Heart Journal 45 (2024): 4099–4110, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Wang X., Jia Z., Zhou X., et al., “Nanoplastic‐Induced Vascular Endothelial Injury and Coagulation Dysfunction in Mice,” Science of the Total Environment 865 (2023): 161271, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Lu Y. Y., Cao M., Tian M., and Huang Q., “Internalization and Cytotoxicity of Polystyrene Microplastics in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells,” Journal of Applied Toxicology 43 (2023): 262–271, 10.1002/jat.4378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Christodoulides A., Hall A., and Alves N. J., “Exploring Microplastic Impact on Whole Blood Clotting Dynamics Utilizing Thromboelastography,” Frontiers in Public Health 11 (2023): 1215817, 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1215817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Shen Z., Xiang M., Chen C., et al., “Glutamate Excitotoxicity: Potential Therapeutic Target for Ischemic Stroke,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 151 (2022): 113125, 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Kooij G., (2025), https://BioRender.com/4lraxjm.
- 107. Levinson S., Pulli B., and Heit J. J., “Neuroinflammation and Acute Ischemic Stroke: Impact on Translational Research and Clinical Care,” Frontiers in Surgery 12 (2025): 1501359, 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1501359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Lo E. H., Dalkara T., and Moskowitz M. A., “Mechanisms, Challenges and Opportunities in Stroke,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 4 (2003): 399–415, 10.1038/nrn1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Qin C., Yang S., Chu Y. H., et al., “Signaling Pathways Involved in Ischemic Stroke: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Interventions,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 7 (2022): 215, 10.1038/s41392-022-01064-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Lemmens T. P., Broker V., Rijpkema M., Hughes C. C. W., Schurgers L. J., and Cosemans J., “Fundamental Considerations for Designing Endothelialized In Vitro Models of Thrombosis,” Thrombosis Research 236 (2024): 179–190, 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Hansen C. E., Hollaus D., Kamermans A., and de Vries H. E., “Tension at the Gate: Sensing Mechanical Forces at the Blood‐Brain Barrier in Health and Disease,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 21 (2024): 325, 10.1186/s12974-024-03321-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Santos F., Sum H., Yan D. C. L., and Brewer A. C., “Metaboloepigenetics: Role in the Regulation of Flow‐Mediated Endothelial (Dys)function and Atherosclerosis,” Cells 14 (2025): 14, 10.3390/cells14050378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Lupu F., Kinasewitz G., and Dormer K., “The Role of Endothelial Shear Stress on Haemodynamics, Inflammation, Coagulation and Glycocalyx During Sepsis,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 24 (2020): 12258–12271, 10.1111/jcmm.15895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Dessalles C. A., Leclech C., Castagnino A., and Barakat A. I., “Integration of Substrate‐ and Flow‐Derived Stresses in Endothelial Cell Mechanobiology,” Communications Biology 4 (2021): 764, 10.1038/s42003-021-02285-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Nishimura N., Schaffer C. B., Friedman B., Lyden P. D., and Kleinfeld D., “Penetrating Arterioles Are a Bottleneck in the Perfusion of Neocortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (2007): 365–370, 10.1073/pnas.0609551104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Shih A. Y., Blinder P., Tsai P. S., et al., “The Smallest Stroke: Occlusion of One Penetrating Vessel Leads to Infarction and a Cognitive Deficit,” Nature Neuroscience 16 (2013): 55–63, 10.1038/nn.3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Schaffer C. B., Friedman B., Nishimura N., et al., “Two‐Photon Imaging of Cortical Surface Microvessels Reveals a Robust Redistribution in Blood Flow After Vascular Occlusion,” PLoS Biology 4 (2006): e22, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Georgakopoulou T., van der Wijk A. E., van Bavel E., and Bakker E., “Perivascular Clearance of Blood Proteins After Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption in a Rat Model of Microinfarcts,” Microvascular Research 148 (2023): 104515, 10.1016/j.mvr.2023.104515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Georgakopoulou T., van der Wijk A. E., Bakker E., and vanBavel E., “Recovery of Hypoxic Regions in a Rat Model of Microembolism,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases: The Official Journal of National Stroke Association 30 (2021): 105739, 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Iadecola C. and Anrather J., “The Immunology of Stroke: From Mechanisms to Translation,” Nature Medicine 17 (2011): 796–808, 10.1038/nm.2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Ludhiadch A., Sharma R., Muriki A., and Munshi A., “Role of Calcium Homeostasis in Ischemic Stroke: A Review,” CNS & Neurological Disorders Drug Targets 21 (2022): 52–61, 10.2174/1871527320666210212141232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Yemisci M., Gursoy‐Ozdemir Y., Vural A., Can A., Topalkara K., and Dalkara T., “Pericyte Contraction Induced by Oxidative‐Nitrative Stress Impairs Capillary Reflow Despite Successful Opening of an Occluded Cerebral Artery,” Nature Medicine 15 (2009): 1031–1037, 10.1038/nm.2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Moser M., Nieswandt B., Ussar S., Pozgajova M., and Fassler R., “Kindlin‐3 Is Essential for Integrin Activation and Platelet Aggregation,” Nature Medicine 14 (2008): 325–330, 10.1038/nm1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Eltzschig H. K. and Carmeliet P., “Hypoxia and Inflammation,” New England Journal of Medicine 364 (2011): 656–665, 10.1056/NEJMra0910283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Chen G. Y. and Nunez G., “Sterile Inflammation: Sensing and Reacting to Damage,” Nature Reviews. Immunology 10 (2010): 826–837, 10.1038/nri2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Shaheryar Z. A., Khan M. A., Adnan C. S., Zaidi A. A., Hanggi D., and Muhammad S., “Neuroinflammatory Triangle Presenting Novel Pharmacological Targets for Ischemic Brain Injury,” Frontiers in Immunology 12 (2021): 748663, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.748663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Powers K. A., Szaszi K., Khadaroo R. G., et al., “Oxidative Stress Generated by Hemorrhagic Shock Recruits Toll‐Like Receptor 4 to the Plasma Membrane in Macrophages,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 203 (2006): 1951–1961, 10.1084/jem.20060943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Hotchkiss R. S., Strasser A., McDunn J. E., and Swanson P. E., “Cell Death,” New England Journal of Medicine 361 (2009): 1570–1583, 10.1056/NEJMra0901217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Salaudeen M. A., Bello N., Danraka R. N., and Ammani M. L., “Understanding the Pathophysiology of Ischemic Stroke: The Basis of Current Therapies and Opportunity for New Ones,” Biomolecules 14 (2024): 14, 10.3390/biom14030305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Candelario‐Jalil E., Dijkhuizen R. M., and Magnus T., “Neuroinflammation, Stroke, Blood‐Brain Barrier Dysfunction, and Imaging Modalities,” Stroke 53 (2022): 1473–1486, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.036946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. van der Wijk A. E., Georgakopoulou T., Steendam R., et al., “Extravasation of Biodegradable Microspheres in the Rat Brain,” Drug Delivery 30 (2023): 2194579, 10.1080/10717544.2023.2194579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. van der Wijk A. E., Georgakopoulou T., Majolee J., et al., “Microembolus Clearance Through Angiophagy Is an Auxiliary Mechanism Preserving Tissue Perfusion in the Rat Brain,” Acta Neuropathologica Communications 8 (2020): 195, 10.1186/s40478-020-01071-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Gupta A., Chazen J. L., Hartman M., et al., “Cerebrovascular Reserve and Stroke Risk in Patients With Carotid Stenosis or Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Stroke 43 (2012): 2884–2891, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Vaclavu L., Meynart B. N., Mutsaerts H., et al., “Hemodynamic Provocation With Acetazolamide Shows Impaired Cerebrovascular Reserve in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease,” Haematologica 104 (2019): 690–699, 10.3324/haematol.2018.206094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Vaclavu L., Petr J., Petersen E. T., et al., “Cerebral Oxygen Metabolism in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease,” American Journal of Hematology 95 (2020): 401–412, 10.1002/ajh.25727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Junejo R. T., Braz I. D., Lucas S. J. E., van Lieshout J. J., Lip G. Y. H., and Fisher J. P., “Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 73 (2019): 1230–1232, 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Walsh H. J., Junejo R. T., Lip G. Y. H., and Fisher J. P., “The Effect of Hypertension on Cerebrovascular Carbon Dioxide Reactivity in Atrial Fibrillation Patients,” Hypertension Research 47 (2024): 1678–1687, 10.1038/s41440-024-01662-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Leoni R. F., Oliveira I. A., Pontes‐Neto O. M., Santos A. C., and Leite J. P., “Cerebral Blood Flow and Vasoreactivity in Aging: An Arterial Spin Labeling Study,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 50 (2017): e5670, 10.1590/1414-431X20175670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Sleight E., Stringer M. S., Marshall I., Wardlaw J. M., and Thrippleton M. J., “Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measurement Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review,” Frontiers in Physiology 12 (2021): 643468, 10.3389/fphys.2021.643468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Kakaletsis N., Protogerou A. D., Kotsis V., et al., “Advanced Vascular Aging and Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Human Hypertension 38 (2024): 676–686, 10.1038/s41371-024-00961-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Kaynak N., Kennel V., Rackoll T., Schulze D., Endres M., and Nave A. H., “Impaired Glucose Metabolism and the Risk of Vascular Events and Mortality After Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Cardiovascular Diabetology 23 (2024): 323, 10.1186/s12933-024-02413-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. van Dinther M., Hooghiemstra A. M., Bron E. E., et al., “Lower Cerebral Blood Flow Predicts Cognitive Decline in Patients With Vascular Cognitive Impairment,” Alzheimer's & Dementia 20 (2024): 136–144, 10.1002/alz.13408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Schuff N., Matsumoto S., Kmiecik J., et al., “Cerebral Blood Flow in Ischemic Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease, Measured by Arterial Spin‐Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Alzheimer's & Dementia 5 (2009): 454–462, 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.04.1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Fresnais D., Ihle‐Hansen H., Lundström E., Andersson Å. G., and Fure B., “Cerebrovascular Hemodynamics in Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Transcranial Doppler Studies,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 52 (2023): 277–295, 10.1159/000535422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Elahi F. M., Wang M. M., and Meschia J. F., “Cerebral Small Vessel Disease‐Related Dementia: More Questions Than Answers,” Stroke 54 (2023): 648–660, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Jacob M. A., Cai M., van de Donk V., et al., “Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Progression and the Risk of Dementia: A 14‐Year Follow‐Up Study,” American Journal of Psychiatry 180 (2023): 508–518, 10.1176/appi.ajp.20220380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Zhao D., Guallar E., Qiao Y., et al., “Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Incident Dementia: The ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities),” Circulation 150 (2024): 838–847, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Taylor Z. J., Hui E. S., Watson A. N., et al., “Microvascular Basis for Growth of Small Infarcts Following Occlusion of Single Penetrating Arterioles in Mouse Cortex,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism: Official Journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 36 (2016): 1357–1373, 10.1177/0271678x15608388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Wardlaw J. M., Smith C., and Dichgans M., “Mechanisms of Sporadic Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Insights From Neuroimaging,” Lancet Neurology 12 (2013): 483–497, 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70060-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Goldberg I., Auriel E., Russell D., and Korczyn A. D., “Microembolism, Silent Brain Infarcts and Dementia,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences 322 (2012): 250–253, 10.1016/j.jns.2012.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Iadecola C., “The Pathobiology of Vascular Dementia,” Neuron 80 (2013): 844–866, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Venkat P., Chopp M., and Chen J., “Models and Mechanisms of Vascular Dementia,” Experimental Neurology 272 (2015): 97–108, 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Reeson P., Choi K., and Brown C. E., “VEGF Signaling Regulates the Fate of Obstructed Capillaries in Mouse Cortex,” eLife 7 (2018): 7, 10.7554/eLife.33670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Zedde M. and Pascarella R., “The Cerebrovascular Side of Plasticity: Microvascular Architecture Across Health and Neurodegenerative and Vascular Diseases,” Brain Sciences 14 (2024): 14, 10.3390/brainsci14100983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Yamamoto K. and Saito H., “A Pathological Role of Increased Expression of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor‐1 in Human or Animal Disorders,” International Journal of Hematology 68 (1998): 371–385, 10.1016/s0925-5710(98)00094-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Yepes M., “Reprint of: Fibrinolytic and Non‐Fibrinolytic Roles of Tissue‐Type Plasminogen Activator in the Ischemic Brain,” Neuroscience 550 (2024): 21–29, 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Morrow G. B. and Mutch N. J., “Past, Present, and Future Perspectives of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI‐1),” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 49 (2023): 305–313, 10.1055/s-0042-1758791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Yepes M., Woo Y., and Martin‐Jimenez C., “Plasminogen Activators in Neurovascular and Neurodegenerative Disorders,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22 (2021): 22, 10.3390/ijms22094380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Ho‐Tin‐Noé B., Desilles J.‐P., and Mazighi M., “Thrombus Composition and Thrombolysis Resistance in Stroke,” Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis 7 (2023): 100178, 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Zhang Y., Jiang M., Gao Y., et al., “‘No‐Reflow’ Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 44 (2024): 19–37, 10.1177/0271678x231208476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Desilles J. P., Loyau S., Syvannarath V., et al., “Alteplase Reduces Downstream Microvascular Thrombosis and Improves the Benefit of Large Artery Recanalization in Stroke,” Stroke 46 (2015): 3241–3248, 10.1161/strokeaha.115.010721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Chang R., Castillo J., Zambon A. C., Krasieva T. B., Fisher M. J., and Sumbria R. K., “Brain Endothelial Erythrophagocytosis and Hemoglobin Transmigration Across Brain Endothelium: Implications for Pathogenesis of Cerebral Microbleeds,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 12 (2018): 279, 10.3389/fncel.2018.00279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Chang R. T., Fisher M. J., and Sumbria R. K., “Brain Endothelial Cells as Phagocytes: Mechanisms and Implications,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 22 (2025): 30, 10.1186/s12987-025-00637-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Fens M. H., van Wijk R., Andringa G., et al., “A Role for Activated Endothelial Cells in Red Blood Cell Clearance: Implications for Vasopathology,” Haematologica 97 (2012): 500–508, 10.3324/haematol.2011.048694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
