Abstract
Background: Root canal treatment requires thorough chemomechanical debridement and three-dimensional obturation for a fluid-tight seal. However, complete eradication of microbial biofilms is difficult due to the complexities of root canal anatomy, limiting irrigant penetration. Photodynamic therapy plays a key role in enhancing antimicrobial efficacy. Bioceramic sealers are commonly used due to their biocompatibility, antibacterial properties, and bioactivity, though their high alkalinity can damage exposed collagen, leading to tooth fracture. Cross-linking of collagen can slow biodegradation and improve dentin strength. Medicinal plants, like Curcuma longa, offer antimicrobial and immune-modulatory properties, with its extract curcumin also serving as a photosensitizer and cross-linking agent. The study explores curcumin's ability to combat Enterococcus faecalis biofilms and improve collagen matrix integrity in root dentin.
Aim and objective: This study aimed to examine the antibiofilm efficacy of collagen cross‑linking agents and their effects on the integrity of the radicular collagen matrix.
Methodology: Thirty extracted single-rooted human teeth were decoronated to standardize the root length to 12 mm and then prepared using ProTaper rotary files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) up to size F3. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups based on the irrigant used (curcumin, chlorhexidine, and saline). Each group was further subdivided based on the evaluation method. In one set of samples, Enterococcus faecalis was inoculated into the canals and incubated for 21 days. Following disinfection with the respective irrigant photoactivated with a diode laser, bacterial quantification was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Another set of samples was obturated after surface treatment with the same irrigants and stored in artificial saliva. The release of hydroxyproline, an indicator of collagen degradation, was measured spectrophotometrically after 21 days. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
Results: Curcumin with light activation (Group 1A) demonstrated the highest cycle threshold values (38.20 ± 1.34), indicating superior bacterial reduction, followed by chlorhexidine (25.06 ± 3.11) and saline. E. faecalis counts were lowest in Group 1A (210.60 ± 46.11). Hydroxyproline release was minimal in curcumin-treated samples (0.04 ± 0.02), suggesting better collagen preservation, while the control showed the highest release (1.18 ± 0.28). Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences among groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Curcumin, particularly when photoactivated, exhibits potent antibiofilm effects and protects collagen in root dentin, making it a promising adjunct in endodontic therapy.
Keywords: antibiofilm, bioceramic sealer, chlorhexidine, collagen integrity, cross-linking agents, curcumin, e. faecalis, hydroxyproline, photodynamic therapy, root canal treatment
Introduction
The fundamental principle of root canal therapy is effective infection control, which focuses on eliminating existing microbial contamination and ensuring that the root canal system remains protected from future reinfection [1]. Recurrent infections in root canal-treated teeth continue to occur despite adherence to thorough treatment protocols, primarily due to the persistence of Enterococcus faecalis, a Gram-positive facultative anaerobe known for its ability to deeply invade dentinal tubules [2,3].
E. faecalis not only forms dense colonies on canal walls but also develops biofilms by utilizing periodontal ligament fluid, which shields it from host immune responses and disinfecting solutions [4]. It possesses several virulence factors, including quorum sensing, adhesins, capsular polysaccharide, and collagen-binding protein, all of which contribute to its antibiotic resistance and persistence within the root canal microenvironment [5]. To address this challenge, clinicians are adopting advanced techniques such as light-induced activation of canal irrigating solutions, along with meticulous instrumentation to overcome the anatomical complexities of the canal [6]. Additionally, photodynamic activation of irrigants induces the generation of reactive oxygen species, rendering them bactericidal [7].
Beyond chemo-mechanical debridement, it is essential to seal the canal from the surrounding microenvironment through thorough three-dimensional obturation. Various sealers are used to aid the obturating material in achieving an adequate seal. Currently, bioceramic sealers are highly preferred due to their biocompatibility, bioactivity, water sorption, and antibacterial properties. However, their elevated alkalinity has been associated with collagen degradation, dentin breakdown, and an increased risk of tooth fracture [8].
Notably, collagen cross-linking, a novel technique, has proven beneficial in slowing the rate of biodegradation and enhancing the mechanical properties of collagen. Several agents, including riboflavin, proanthocyanidin, chlorhexidine (CHX), genipin, and green tea, can promote intra- and intermolecular cross-links [9,10]. In the present study, curcumin was selected due to its multiple advantageous properties, making it highly suitable for endodontic applications.
Curcumin, a natural phenolic compound derived from Curcuma longa (turmeric), a well-known Indian spice, has well-documented analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. In addition, it exhibits strong antimicrobial activity and has been shown to inhibit matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), potentially enhancing the collagen matrix integrity of radicular dentin [11].
Given its promising properties, this study aimed to evaluate the antibiofilm efficacy of curcumin as a collagen cross-linking agent and its impact on the structural integrity of the radicular collagen matrix. The null hypothesis proposed that curcumin irrigant would neither eradicate E. faecalis nor inhibit biofilm formation, nor improve the integrity of the radicular collagen matrix, nor reduce hydroxyproline release.
This article was previously presented as a paper at the 24th IACDE National PG Convention, held on February 29th, 2024, in Chennai, Tamil Nadu.
Materials and methods
This in vitro study was conducted in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SVS (Sri Venkata Sai) Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.
Thirty extracted single-rooted human permanent teeth were collected and stored in distilled water. Inclusion criteria included mature, fully developed single-rooted teeth with intact roots, free from caries, fractures, or prior endodontic treatment. Exclusion criteria comprised teeth with open apices, signs of internal or external resorption, anatomical variations (e.g., curved roots and extra canals), or visible cracks/fractures. All teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) using a diamond disc (Mani Inc., Utsunomiya, Japan), standardizing the root length to 12 mm. The specimens were sterilized in an autoclave (Confident Dental Equipments Ltd., Bengaluru, India) at 121°C for 20 minutes. Canal patency was confirmed with a size 10 K-file (Mani Inc., Utsunomiya, Japan), and working length was established 0.5 mm short of the apex. Initial preparation was done up to size 20 K-file (Mani Inc., Utsunomiya, Japan), followed by complete instrumentation using the ProTaper Gold rotary system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) up to F3 using the crown-down technique. During instrumentation, canals were irrigated with 1 mL each of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)(Prime Dental Products Pvt. Ltd., Thane, India), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Prime Dental Products Pvt. Ltd., Thane, India), and 0.9% normal saline (Aculife Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad, India). After instrumentation, specimens were cleaned in distilled water using an ultrasonic bath (Oscar Ultrasonics Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) for 30 minutes. The roots were dried, coated externally with clear nail varnish, and sterilized again in an autoclave at 121°C and 15 psi for 30 minutes.
This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of SVS Dental College, Mahabubnagar (Approval No.: SVSIDS/CONS/6/2023).
Preparation of curcumin irrigant
Pure curcumin powder in capsule form (West Coast Pharmaceutical Works Ltd., Ahmedabad, India) was used (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Curcumin.
Three grams of curcumin were weighed using an electronic balance (Citizen Scales Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) and mixed with 15 mL of distilled water. The mixture was heated to 100°C on a hot plate until a homogeneous solution formed, then allowed to cool. It was filtered through Whatman filter paper (Cytiva, Little Chalfont, UK) and stored in screw cap test tubes (Borosil Ltd., Mumbai, India) at 4°C (Figure 2). Before use, the solution was brought to room temperature.
Figure 2. Filtering the solution through Whatman filter paper.
Study methodology
The 30 teeth were randomly divided into three main groups (Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3), each with two subgroups (subgroups 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B). Group 1A: curcumin irrigant activated using diode laser (Epic X, Biolase Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA, USA); Group 1B: surface treatment with curcumin; Group 2A: chlorhexidine irrigant (Zodenta, Indoco Remedies Ltd., Mumbai, India) activated using blue light; Group 2B: surface treatment with chlorhexidine; Group 3A: saline irrigant activated using blue light; Group 3B: surface treatment with saline.
Bacterial inoculation
All teeth in subgroup A were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC strain 29212), prepared in the Department of Microbiology, SVS Institute of Medical Sciences. Apices were sealed with modeling wax (MAARC Dental Products, Satara, India), and 5 µL of bacterial suspension was introduced using a micropipette (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) under aseptic conditions (Figure 3). Coronal access was sealed with wax, and specimens were incubated (NSW India Ltd., Ambala, India) at 37°C for 21 days. Fresh bacterial suspension was replenished every third day.
Figure 3. Bacterial inoculation.
Irrigant placement and activation
After incubation, canals were irrigated as per group designation (curcumin, chlorhexidine, or saline) (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Placement of irrigants.
Irrigants were activated with a diode laser (940 nm) (Epic X, Biolase Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA, USA) using a 200 μm fiber-optic tip. The tip was inserted 1 mm short of the apex and moved at 2 mm/s for five seconds. This cycle was repeated four times at 10-second intervals (Figure 5).
Figure 5. (a) Diode laser (Biolase Epic X). (b) Irrigant activation with laser.
To assess bacterial presence, dentin chips were collected along the canal length using Gates Glidden drills (sizes 4 and 5) (Mani Inc., Utsunomiya, Japan) and transferred to sterile Eppendorf tubes (Helini Biomolecules, Chennai, India) containing brain heart infusion broth. Samples were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours (Figure 6).
Figure 6. (a) Collection of dentin chips. (b) Collected dentinal chips in sterile Eppendorf plastic tubes.
Preparation of purified DNA
Following incubation, the samples were centrifuged (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany), and 1 mL EDTA was added. Samples were treated sequentially with digestion buffer, lysozyme, proteinase K, and binding buffer (Helini Biomolecules, Chennai, India), incubated at specified temperatures. Ethanol (Pharmco, Brookfield, CT, USA) was added, and the mixture was passed through a Purefast® DNA extraction spin column kit (Helini Biomolecules, Chennai, India) for DNA binding and washing. Purified DNA was eluted and stored at -20°C (Figure 7).
Figure 7. (a) 1 ml of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was added. (b) 180 μl of digestion buffer was added. (c) 20 μl of lysozyme was added. (d) 200 μl of binding buffer was added. (e) 20 μl of proteinase K was added. (f) Ethanol was added. (g) 500 μl of wash buffer was added. (h) Purified DNA was stored at -20°C.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) setup
Purified DNA was mixed with Probe PCR Master Mix, E. faecalis PP Mix, and PCR-grade water (Helini Biomolecules, Chennai, India). Negative and positive controls (10 μL each) were included. PCR was performed using a thermocycler (QuantStudio™ 5, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) to amplify E. faecalis DNA (Figure 8).
Figure 8. Thermo QuantStudio 5 real-time polymerase chain reaction system.
In subgroup B, following biomechanical preparation, the canals were surface-treated as follows: curcumin (Group 1B), chlorhexidine (Group 2B), and saline (Group 3B) for one minute (Figure 9).
Figure 9. Surface treatment with (a) curcumin, (b) chlorhexidine, and (c) saline.
After drying with paper points (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), canals were obturated with gutta-percha (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and a bioceramic sealer (Prime Dental Products Pvt. Ltd., Thane, India) (Figure 10).
Figure 10. Obturated with gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer.
Specimens were stored in artificial saliva (Wet Mouth, ICPA Health Products Ltd., Mumbai, India) at room temperature for 21 days (Figure 11).
Figure 11. Artificial saliva.
Assessment of hydroxyproline release
After 21 days, hydroxyproline (HYP) release, an indicator of collagen degradation, was measured from the storage medium using a HYP assay. Two hundred microliters of vortexed medium was placed into labeled ampules. Spectrophotometric analysis (UV-1800, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan ) was performed at 558 nm (Figure 12).
Figure 12. Spectrophotometer.
HYP concentration was calculated using the regression equation: Sa/Sv = C.
Where, Sa = amount of HYP (µg), from the standard curve; Sv = volume of sample added (µL); C = concentration of HYP in the sample.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Mean values for cycle threshold (Ct), E. faecalis count (colony-forming units), and hydroxyproline release were calculated. Normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Levene’s test. As the data met parametric assumptions, intergroup comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test for pairwise comparisons. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (Figure 13).
Figure 13. Flowchart of the methodology.
EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; HYP: hydroxyproline.
Results
Intergroup comparison of mean cycle threshold (Ct) values revealed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Curcumin (Group 1A) exhibited the highest Ct value (mean ± SD = 38.20 ± 1.34), indicating the lowest bacterial load, followed by chlorhexidine (Group 2A: mean ± SD = 25.06 ± 3.11). The saline group (Group 3A) showed the lowest Ct values (Table 1).
Table 1. Intergroup comparison of mean cycle threshold values.
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA.
* Statistical significance at P < 0.05.
| Groups | Mean ± SD | F-value | P-value |
| Group 1A | 38.20 ± 1.34 | 90.52 | 0.00* |
| Group 2A | 25.06 ± 3.11 | ||
| Group 3A | 15.54 ± 3.15 |
Pairwise Ct value comparisons showed the smallest mean difference between curcumin and chlorhexidine (Group 1A vs. 2A, P = 0.00) and the largest difference between curcumin and saline (Group 1A vs. 3A, P = 0.00) (Table 2).
Table 2. Pairwise comparison of mean cycle threshold values.
Post hoc analysis was performed using Tukey’s test.
* Statistical significance at P < 0.05.
| Pairwise comparison | Mean difference | P-value |
| Group 1A vs. Group 2A | 13.14 | 0.00* |
| Group 1A vs. Group 3A | 22.66 | 0.00* |
| Group 2A vs. Group 3A | 9.52 | 0.00* |
For E. faecalis counts, significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed across groups. Curcumin (Group 1A) had the lowest bacterial count (mean ± SD = 210.60 ± 46.11) (Table 3).
Table 3. Intergroup comparison of mean E. faecalis count (CFU).
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA.
* Statistical significance at P < 0.05.
CFU: colony-forming units.
| Groups | Mean ± SD | F-value | P-value |
| Group 1A | 210.60 ± 46.11 | 11.33 | 0.00* |
| Group 2A | 1848.40 ± 1524.33 | ||
| Group 3A | 57640.80 ± 37585.38 |
The mean difference comparison of E. faecalis count shows the smallest difference between Groups 1A and 2A (P = 0.90), and the largest between Groups 1A and 3A (P = 0.00) (Table 4).
Table 4. Pairwise comparison of mean E. faecalis count (CFU).
Post hoc analysis was performed using Tukey’s test.
* Statistical significance at P < 0.05.
CFU: colony-forming units.
| Pairwise comparison | Mean difference | P-value |
| Group 1A vs. Group 2A | 1637.80 | 0.90 |
| Group 1A vs. Group 3A | 57430.20 | 0.00* |
| Group 2A vs. Group 3A | 55792.40 | 0.00* |
Hydroxyproline release was lowest in the curcumin group (Group 1A: mean ± SD = 0.04 ± 0.02), while the highest value was seen in the control group (Group 3B: mean ± SD = 1.18 ± 0.28), with results statistically significant (P = 0.00) (Table 5).
Table 5. Intergroup comparison of mean hydroxyproline release.
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA.
* Statistical significance at P < 0.05.
| Groups | Mean ± SD | F-value | P-value |
| Group 1B | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 72.16 | 0.00* |
| Group 2B | 0.13 ± 0.02 | ||
| Group 3B | 1.18 ± 0.28 |
Pairwise comparisons of hydroxyproline release showed the least difference between Groups 1B and 2B (mean difference = 0.09; P = 0.38), followed by Groups 2B vs. 3B (mean difference = 1.04; P = 0.00). The highest difference was between Groups 1B and 3B (P = 0.00) (Table 6).
Table 6. Pairwise comparison of mean hydroxyproline release.
Post hoc analysis was performed using Tukey’s test.
* Statistical significance at P < 0.05.
| Comparison group | Mean difference | P-value |
| Group 1B vs. Group 2B | 0.09 | 0.38 |
| Group 1B vs. Group 3B | 1.13 | 0.00* |
| Group 2B vs. Group 3B | 1.04 | 0.00* |
Discussion
The results of the present study demonstrated the superior effectiveness of curcumin over chlorhexidine and saline in terms of antimicrobial efficacy and preservation of collagen integrity, thereby rejecting the null hypothesis (Tables 1, 3).
Mechanical instrumentation is a critical component of successful root canal therapy, as it facilitates the removal of contaminated dentin and shapes the canals for effective irrigation and obturation. However, complex canal anatomy, such as lateral canals, isthmuses, and accessory branches, poses significant challenges to complete debridement. Moreover, bacteria residing in these areas can survive harsh environmental conditions and resist many conventional antibiotics [12].
Enterococcus faecalis is a particularly resilient Gram-positive anaerobe capable of withstanding such conditions, making it one of the most common causes of root canal failure and persistent infections. Its ability to compete with other microorganisms, invade dentinal tubules, resist nutrient deprivation, and form monospecies biofilms allows it to survive even under extreme conditions, including elevated temperatures [13,14]. Given these virulence traits, E. faecalis was chosen as the primary pathogen for investigation in this study.
In recent years, there has been a significant shift in oral microbiology from culture-based methods to molecular techniques. Among these, PCR amplification of 16S rDNA and other bacterial sequences has emerged as a highly specific and sensitive method for detecting both cultivable and non-cultivable species. Unlike endpoint PCR, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) not only detects specific bacterial genes but also allows quantification of bacterial load in clinical samples [15]. Sedgley et al. reported a significantly higher detection rate of E. faecalis using qPCR compared to culture techniques [16]. Hence, real-time PCR was employed in the current study to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants against E. faecalis.
Two irrigants (chlorhexidine and curcumin) were tested for both their antimicrobial action and collagen-stabilizing properties. Chlorhexidine is a well-established antimicrobial agent effective against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and yeasts. Its mechanism of action involves interaction between its positively charged molecules and the negatively charged phosphate groups on bacterial cell walls, leading to cell wall disruption and bacterial death [17].
In the present study, laser activation was employed to enhance irrigant efficacy. Laser activation improves canal decontamination by promoting cavitation and photoacoustic streaming, thereby enhancing irrigant penetration and debris removal [18]. Unlike chlorhexidine, curcumin acts as a natural photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy, producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon light activation. These ROS effectively destroy pathogens without damaging host tissues, which may explain the higher antimicrobial efficacy observed with curcumin (Tables 1, 3). This finding is supported by Diogo et al. [19], who reported that photoactivated sensitizers were more effective at disrupting E. faecalis biofilms than standard irrigants such as chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Additionally, photodynamic therapy is known to enhance the depth of irrigant penetration [20,21]. Sharifzadeh et al. (2023) [22] further reinforced this, reporting deeper canal penetration of curcumin when activated photodynamically, which may contribute to its superior antibacterial action.
The study also evaluated the collagen-stabilizing ability of the two irrigants. This aspect is particularly important with the current use of bioceramic sealers, which are favored for their bioactivity and sealing capabilities [22]. However, their high pH can compromise the structural integrity of dentin by disrupting the collagen network and increasing its permeability [23].
Curcumin and chlorhexidine are both known to act as cross-linking agents [24], potentially mitigating the detrimental effects of high-pH sealers on dentinal collagen. The present results align with this, as both agents demonstrated significantly lower hydroxyproline release than the control group (saline), indicating reduced collagen degradation (Table 5).
Collagen breakdown is mediated by proteolytic enzymes such as MMPs [25]. Curcumin inhibits this activity by binding to zinc ions (Zn²⁺), which are essential cofactors for MMP function [26,27]. Seseogullari-Dirihan et al. [28] observed substantial inhibition and complete inactivation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 following curcumin treatment of dentin. Similarly, chlorhexidine not only inhibits MMPs 2, 8, and 9 but also suppresses the activity of dentinal cysteine cathepsins B, K, and L, further preserving collagen matrix integrity [29].
Limitations
This study was conducted under in vitro conditions, which may not fully replicate the complex biological environment of the oral cavity. Variables such as the buffering capacity of dentinal fluid, host immune responses, and clinical challenges during irrigation and obturation were not considered. Additionally, the sample size was limited, and only a single bacterial species (E. faecalis) was evaluated. Further in vivo studies with larger sample sizes and polymicrobial biofilms are recommended to validate these findings. Additionally, curcumin, while promising, has practical limitations, including poor water solubility, photodegradation, a need for light activation, and potential for tooth and dentin discoloration. These factors must be considered when evaluating its clinical applicability, and further in vivo studies with larger, anatomically varied samples are necessary to validate the findings.
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this in vitro study, curcumin demonstrated superior antimicrobial activity and collagen-stabilizing properties compared to chlorhexidine and saline. Its dual function as a natural photosensitizer and collagen cross-linker makes it a promising alternative irrigant in endodontic therapy. The reduced bacterial load and lower hydroxyproline release observed with curcumin suggest improved disinfection and enhanced preservation of dentinal collagen, potentially contributing to better long-term outcomes in root canal therapy. Its multifunctionality may also reduce the need for multiple irrigants and simplify clinical protocols. However, given its known limitations, such as poor solubility, photodegradation, and potential for staining, further in vivo studies and clinical trials are essential to evaluate its practical applicability and long-term effectiveness.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Institutional Ethics Committee issued approval SVSIDS/CONS/6/2023.
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Sevitha Thummala, Naresh Kumar K, Sravani Nirmala, Narender Reddy, Kavuri Jyostna
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Sevitha Thummala, Surender L.R., Naresh Kumar K, Narender Reddy, Kavuri Jyostna
Drafting of the manuscript: Sevitha Thummala, Surender L.R., Naresh Kumar K, Sravani Nirmala, Narender Reddy, Kavuri Jyostna
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Sevitha Thummala, Surender L.R., Naresh Kumar K, Sravani Nirmala, Narender Reddy, Kavuri Jyostna
Supervision: Sevitha Thummala, Surender L.R., Sravani Nirmala, Narender Reddy
References
- 1.Expert consensus on irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal therapy. Zou X, Zheng X, Liang Y, et al. Int J Oral Sci. 2024;16:23. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00280-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dentinal tubule disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis, morinda citrifolia juice, 2% povidone iodine, and calcium hydroxide. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Gogulnath D, Kindo AJ. Int Endod J. 2010;43:419–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide, triple antibiotic paste and bromelain against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. Chandwani ND, Maurya N, Nikhade P, Chandwani J. J Conserv Dent. 2022;25:63–67. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_461_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of triple antibiotic paste and amoxicillin clavulanate paste as an intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. Sasikala D, Baghkomeh PN, Farzan JM. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38476718/ Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2024;21:10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Carnosic acid as an intracanal medicament performs better than triple antibiotic paste and calcium hydroxide to eradicate Enterococcus faecalis from root canal: an in vitro confocal laser scanning microscopic study. Dessai A, Shetty N, Saralaya V, Natarajan S, Mala K. J Conserv Dent. 2022;25:20–25. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_317_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Quercetin as an auxiliary endodontic irrigant for root canal treatment: anti-biofilm and dentin collagen-stabilizing effects in vitro. Liu Z, Feng X, Wang X, Yang S, Mao J, Gong S. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:1178. doi: 10.3390/ma14051178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Photoactivation of curcumin and sodium hypochlorite to enhance antibiofilm efficacy in root canal dentin. Neelakantan P, Cheng CQ, Ravichandran V, et al. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2015;12:108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: a review. Cirstea AC, Gheorghiță LM, Diaconu OA, et al. https://rjor.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BIOCERAMIC-BASED-ROOT-CANAL-SEALERS-A-REVIEW.pdf Romanian J Oral Rehab. 2020;12:48–54. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Effect of collagen cross-linking agents on the depth of penetration of bioceramic sealer and release of hydroxyproline: an in vitro study. Reddy KH, Swetha B, Priya BD, Mohan TM, Malini DL, Sravya MS. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024;27:170–174. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_309_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Role of different collagen cross-linking agents like proanthocyanidin, riboflavin and white tea on the shear bond strength to dentin- an in-vitro study. Varghese AS, Prakash V, Mitthra S, Mary NS, Deepti JV, Subbiya A, Nilofer J. https://www.nveo.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1376 Nat Volatiles Essent Oils. 2021;8:6396–6407. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dentin biomodification agents in dentistry-a critical review. de Freitas BD, da Ponte AM, Farias FR, Feitosa VP, de Paula DM. https://www.walshmedicalmedia.com/open-access/dentin-biomodification-agents-in-dentistrya-critical-review.pdf Oral Health Dent Manag. 2019;18:1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anatomical complexities affecting root canal preparation: a narrative review. Versiani MA, Martins J, Ordinola-Zapata R. Aust Dent J. 2023;68:0–23. doi: 10.1111/adj.12992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: relationship to endodontic disease. Kayaoglu G, Ørstavik D. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15:308–320. doi: 10.1177/154411130401500506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Int Endod J. 2002;35:221–228. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.In vitro evaluation of five different herbal extracts as an antimicrobial endodontic irrigant using real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Vinothkumar TS, Rubin MI, Balaji L, Kandaswamy D. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16:167–170. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.108208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and culture analyses of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals. Sedgley C, Nagel A, Dahlén G, Reit C, Molander A. J Endod. 2006;32:173–177. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chlorhexidine in endodontics. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Zaia AA, Almeida JF, Souza-Filho FJ, Ferraz CC. Braz Dent J. 2013;24:89–102. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201302188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning. Llena C, Cuesta C, Forner L, Mozo S, Segura JJ. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7:0–73. doi: 10.4317/jced.52088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against endodontic Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans mono and mixed biofilms in the presence of photosensitizers: a comparative study with classical endodontic irrigants. Diogo P, Fernandes C, Caramelo F, et al. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:498. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy using indocyanine green and near-infrared diode laser in reducing Entrerococcus faecalis. Beltes C, Sakkas H, Economides N, Papadopoulou C. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017;17:5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Antibacterial effect of photodynamic therapy on root canal disinfection combined with different irrigation protocols. de Vasconcelos Neves G, Dos Santos KSA, de Souza Sales Rocha EAL, de Moura RQ, Morais Barros DG, Gominho LF, de Castro Gomes DQ. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36704438/ Iran Endod J. 2020;15:90–95. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i2.27801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Comparative analysis of photosensitizer penetration depth in root canal debridement for endodontic disinfection. Sharifzadeh SS, Gerami Amin M, Moezzi Ghadim N, Fazlyab M, Azizi A. Iran Endod J. 2024;19:35–38. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i1.41545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bioceramics in endodontics: updates and future perspectives. Dong X, Xu X. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023;10:354. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Effect of curcumin suspension and vitamin C on dentin shear bond strength and durability. A pilot study. Abuelenain DA, Abou Neel EA, Abuhaimed TS, Alamri AM, Ammar HS, Bukhary S. Open Dent J. 2021;15 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Effects of calcium silicate-based materials on collagen matrix integrity of mineralized dentin. Leiendecker AP, Qi YP, Sawyer AN, et al. J Endod. 2012;38:829–833. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Evaluating curcumin and bromelain as dentin biomodifiers for enhancing shear bond strength - an invitro study. Puthur AA, Nayak M, Rohini B, Gagan G. Int J Innov Sci Res. 2024;9:1925–1927. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Effect of dentin biomodification using natural collagen cross-linkers on the durability of the resin-dentin bond and demineralized dentin stiffness. El Gindy AH, Sherief DI, El-Korashy DI. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;138:105551. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Is the inactivation of dentin proteases by crosslinkers reversible? Seseogullari-Dirihan R, Mutluay MM, Pashley DH, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27745773/ Dent Mater. 2017;33:0–8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine downregulate MMP expression on radicular dentin. Retana-Lobo C, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Mendes de Souza BD, Reyes-Carmona J. Med Princ Pract. 2021;30:470–476. doi: 10.1159/000517887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]













