Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1992 Mar;215(3):209–216. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00004

Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

J L Flowers 1, K A Zucker 1, S M Graham 1, W A Scovill 1, A L Imbembo 1, R W Bailey 1
PMCID: PMC1242423  PMID: 1531915

Abstract

One hundred sixty-five operative cholangiograms were attempted in 364 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (45%). Laparoscopic cholangiography was successful in 150 of 165 attempts (91%). Eighty-nine per cent of studies were normal (134/150) and 11% were abnormal (16/150). All 134 patients with normal cholangiograms remained asymptomatic (false-negative rate, 0%). False-positive studies occurred in 3 of 150 (2%) total cholangiograms and 3 of 12 (25%) abnormal cholangiograms consistent with choledocholithiasis. A total of 16 of 364 patients had proven common bile duct stones (4.4%). Eight of the sixteen stones were removed by preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/sphincterotomy. Five of sixteen stones were found at cholangiography, four of which were unsuspected (4/150, 2.6%). Retained common duct stones were found in 3 of 214 patients not undergoing cholangiography (1.4%). No complications or deaths occurred that were due to cholangiography. One biliary injury occurred (1/364, 0.3%), in a patient with aberrant anatomy who did not undergo cholangiography. Laparoscopic cholangiography is a safe technique with a success rate greater than 90%. Routine cholangiography is presently recommended for prevention of biliary injury, detection of stones in the cystic and common ducts, and for training purposes, especially during the learning phase of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Full text

PDF
209

Images in this article

210FIG. 1.
on p.210
211FIG. 2.
on p.211

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alinder G., Nilsson U., Lunderquist A., Herlin P., Holmin T. Pre-operative infusion cholangiography compared to routine operative cholangiography at elective cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1986 May;73(5):383–387. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey R. W., Imbembo A. L., Zucker K. A. Establishment of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy training program. Am Surg. 1991 Apr;57(4):231–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey R. W., Zucker K. A., Flowers J. L., Scovill W. A., Graham S. M., Imbembo A. L. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 1991 Oct;214(4):531–541. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199110000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berci G., Sackier J. M., Paz-Partlow M. Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):355–360. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90597-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berci G., Sackier J. M. The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):382–384. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90602-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bilbao M. K., Dotter C. T., Lee T. G., Katon R. M. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology. 1976 Mar;70(3):314–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blatner M. E., Wittgen C. M., Andrus C. H., Kaminski D. L. Cystic duct cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1991 May;126(5):646–649. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410290124025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brandes J. W., Scheffer B., Lorenz-Meyer H., Körst H. A., Littmann K. P. ERCP: Complications and prophylaxis a controlled study. Endoscopy. 1981 Jan;13(1):27–30. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Del Santo P., Kazarian K. K., Rogers J. F., Bevins P. A., Hall J. R. Prediction of operative cholangiography in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy with routine liver function chemistries. Surgery. 1985 Jul;98(1):7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DenBesten L., Berci G. The current status of biliary tract surgery: an international study of 1072 consecutive patients. World J Surg. 1986 Feb;10(1):116–122. doi: 10.1007/BF01656101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DenBesten L., Doty J. E. Pathogenesis and management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin North Am. 1981 Aug;61(4):893–907. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42487-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Doyle P. J., Ward-McQuaid J. N., Smith A. M. The value of routine peroperative cholangiography--a report of 4000 cholecystectomies. Br J Surg. 1982 Oct;69(10):617–619. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800691020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dubois F., Berthelot G., Levard H. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: historic perspective and personal experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):52–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gelman R., Alexander M. S., Zucker K. A., Bailey R. W. The use of radionuclide imaging in the evaluation of suspected biliary damage during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Radiol. 1991 Summer;16(3):201–204. doi: 10.1007/BF01887346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gerber A., Apt M. K. The case against routine operative cholangiography. Am J Surg. 1982 Jun;143(6):734–736. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gregg R. O. The case for selective cholangiography. Am J Surg. 1988 Apr;155(4):540–545. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80406-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grogono J. L., Woods W. G. Selective use of operative cholangiography. World J Surg. 1986 Dec;10(6):1009–1013. doi: 10.1007/BF01658660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McSherry C. K. Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg. 1989 Sep;158(3):174–178. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90246-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nebel O. T., Silvis S. E., Rogers G., Sugawa C., Mandelstam P. Complications associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Results of the 1974 A/S/G/E survey. Gastrointest Endosc. 1975 Aug;22(1):34–36. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(75)73681-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pagana T. J., Stahlgren L. H. Indications and accuracy of operative cholangiography. Arch Surg. 1980 Oct;115(10):1214–1215. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380100060014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pasquale M. D., Nauta R. J. Selective vs routine use of intraoperative cholangiography. An argument. Arch Surg. 1989 Sep;124(9):1041–1042. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410090047010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Petelin J. B. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):33–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Peters J. H., Ellison E. C., Innes J. T., Liss J. L., Nichols K. E., Lomano J. M., Roby S. R., Front M. E., Carey L. C. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg. 1991 Jan;213(1):3–12. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199101000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Salky B. A., Bauer J. J., Kreel I., Gelernt I. M., Gorfine S. R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial report. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Jan-Feb;37(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70611-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Spaw A. T., Reddick E. J., Olsen D. O. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):2–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stubbs R. S., Blumgart L. H. Per-operative cholangiography: an assessment of the criteria for duct exploration. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1987 Jun;32(3):131–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Voyles C. R., Petro A. B., Meena A. L., Haick A. J., Koury A. M. A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):365–370. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90599-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES