ABSTRACT
The bacterium Edwardsiella ictaluri causes disease in finfish and has been shown to infect multiple species. Eleven E. ictaluri genomes were sequenced, assembled, and annotated from a collection of isolates recovered from several different finfish species. This will serve as a valuable resource for comparative genomics studies.
KEYWORDS: fish pathogens, catfish
ANNOUNCEMENT
The bacterium Edwardsiella ictaluri causes enteric septicemia of catfish (ESC). This pathogen can infect multiple fish species and can be devastating to aquaculture farms (1). Here, we sequenced, assembled, and annotated 11 genomes from a collection of isolates housed at the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit (USDA-ARS-AAHRU). The hosts from which these samples were collected included channel catfish, hybrid blue × channel catfish, walking catfish, and tadpole madtom (Table 1). Most isolates have been previously described elsewhere (2–7), except for a few, as follows. The “Curtis” isolate (Table 1) was recovered from a channel catfish with ESC from a farm in Hale County, Alabama, in 2003, and “T3-F2 AAHRU” (Table 1) was isolated from a channel catfish with ESC at our facility in 2021, both using standard methods for Edwardsiella spp (1). Bacterial isolates were grown from −80°C stocks that were briefly allowed to thaw and then aseptically streaked on sheep blood agar plates and grown at 26°C for 24 h. An individual colony from each isolate was picked by sterile loop, inoculated into brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth, and grown overnight to an approximate OD600 of 0.5. A 1 mL aliquot of each isolate was taken and DNA isolated using the Wizard HMW DNA Extraction Kit (Promega, Madison, WI). We utilized a hybrid long-read (Nanopore) and short-read (Illumina) sequencing and assembly strategy, which aids in the generation of both high-quality chromosome and plasmid genome sequences (8). For Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing, we used the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 for library preparation and sequenced on the GridION using a FLO-MIN114 flow cell. DNA was not sheared/fragmented or size-selected per the manufacturer’s instructions; final library pool fragment size peak was >60 kb analyzed via an Agilent TapeStation with the Genomic DNA ScreenTape (Santa Clara, CA). Base calling was performed using Dorado with the “super accurate” configuration and raw data output to FASTQ format. For Illumina sequencing, 1 µg DNA was sent to a service provider (GENEWIZ, Azenta Life Sciences, South Plainfield, NJ), where the libraries were created using the NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina and the isolates were sequenced to ~1 Gb depth/sample using a 2 × 150 bp configuration on a NovaSeq X. Genomes were assembled using the Plassembler v1.6.2 pipeline (8). Briefly, short and long reads were filtered for quality control using Trimmomatic v0.39 (9) and LongQC v1.2.1 (10), respectively. Then, Flye assembler v2.9.4 (11) was used for chromosome clustering, and Unicycler v0.5.1 (12) was used for plasmid clustering. Each plasmid contig was then matched against The Plasmid Database (PLSDB) v2024_05_31_v2 using mash v2.3 (13). Genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v2024-07-18.build7555 (14). All 11 chromosome sequences were able to be circularized, where the overlap was identified and trimmed automatically in Flye. Default parameters were used unless otherwise noted. All chromosome and plasmid sequences were further analyzed via BLASTn 2.16.0 and are considered circular and complete. A detailed summary of genome assembly statistics can be found in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Summary statistics for the genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation of 11 Edwardsiella ictaluri isolates
| Strain | Total no. of reads (Nanopore) | Genome coverage (Nanopore) | Read N50 (Nanopore) | Total no. of reads (Illumina) | Genome coverage (Illumina) | Genome size (Mbp) | GC content (%) | No. plasmids | No. of predicted genes | Host | 16S top hit by BLASTn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EILO | 200,764 | 130× | 5,540 | 4.4M | 345× | 3.83 | 57.4 | 2 | 3,655 | Clarius batrachus | Ei-39shipment9 |
| RE-33 | 199,631 | 101× | 5,640 | 4.5M | 353× | 3.83 | 57.4 | 2 | 3,659 | Ictalurus punctatus | 14-TAL-019-BIA |
| Curtis | 8,059 | 23× | 9,084 | 4.7M | 395× | 3.56 | 57.5 | 2 | 3,402 | Ictalurus punctatus | Ei-39shipment9 |
| AL-93-58 | 5,677 | 10× | 13,266 | 4.9M | 388× | 3.83 | 57.4 | 3 | 3,695 | Ictalurus punctatus | 14-TAL-019-BIA |
| 30IA New Jersey | 7,679 | 15× | 15,015 | 4.8M | 383× | 3.72 | 57.5 | 1 | 3,547 | Noturus gyrinus | 14-TAL-019-BIA |
| S94-1051 | 8,200 | 15× | 12,990 | 3.7M | 290× | 3.84 | 57.4 | 3 | 3,660 | Ictalurus punctatus | 14-TAL-019-BIA |
| HCF #4 Smooth | 7,763 | 14× | 13,129 | 4.2M | 326× | 3.83 | 57.4 | 3 | 3,773 | Ictalurus punctatus × I. furcatus | Ei-39shipment9 |
| HCF #4Rough | 8,486 | 16× | 13,473 | 4.6M | 360× | 3.83 | 57.4 | 3 | 3,773 | Ictalurus punctatus × I. furcatus | S07-698 |
| NRRL B50348 | 6,591 | 14× | 14,493 | 9.9M | 777× | 3.83 | 57.4 | 2 | 3,668 | Ictalurus punctatus | S07-698 |
| T3-F2 AAHRU | 7,595 | 15× | 12,045 | 10.5M | 823× | 3.84 | 57.4 | 2 | 3,679 | Ictalurus punctatus | Ei-39shipment9 |
| HCF-1 | 6,909 | 23× | 14,478 | 10.6M | 829× | 3.85 | 57.4 | 2 | 3,672 | Ictalurus punctatus × I. furcatus | 14-TAL-019-BIA |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank Paige Mumma for her skilled technical assistance in growing bacterial isolates.
This research was supported in part by an appointment (Research Fellowship to NMS) to the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Research Participation Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). ORISE is managed by ORAU under DOE contract number DE-SC0014664.
All opinions expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of USDA, DOE, or ORAU/ORISE. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the United States Department of Agriculture. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Bacterial isolates were examined from frozen stocks; therefore, this study was exempt from institutional ethics committee review.
Contributor Information
Jason W. Abernathy, Email: Jason.Abernathy@usda.gov.
Irene L. G. Newton, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
Genome assemblies have been deposited to GenBank under the accession numbers CP180729, CP180732, CP180735, CP180738, CP180742, CP180746, CP180750, CP180752, CP180756, CP180759, CP180765.
Raw data (Illumina) can be found in the Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR32269917, SRR32269918, SRR32269919, SRR32269920, SRR32269921, SRR32269922, SRR32269923, SRR32269926, SRR32269936, SRR32269937, SRR32269938.
Raw data (Nanopore) can be found in the Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR32269924, SRR32269925, SRR32269927, SRR32269928, SRR32269929, SRR32269930, SRR32269931, SRR32269932, SRR32269933, SRR32269934, SRR32269935.
REFERENCES
- 1. Griffin MJ, Greenway TE, Wise DJ. 2017. Edwardsiella spp, p 190–210. In Woo PTK, Cipriano RC (ed), Fish viruses and bacteria: pathobiology and protection. CABI, Wallingford, Oxfordshire and Boston, MA. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lafrentz BR, Welch TJ, Shoemaker CA, Drennan JD, Klesius PH. 2011. Modified live Edwardsiella ictaluri vaccine, AQUAVAC-ESC, lacks multidrug resistance plasmids. J Aquat Anim Health 23:195–199. doi: 10.1080/08997659.2011.642093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Klesius P, Lovy J, Evans J, Washuta E, Arias C. 2003. Isolation of Edwardsiella ictaluri from Tadpole Madtom in a Southwestern New Jersey river. J Aquat Anim Health 15:295–301. doi: 10.1577/H03-026.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bader JA, Shoemaker CA, Klesius PH, Connolly MA, Barbaree JM. 1998. Genomic subtyping of Edwardsiella ictaluri isolated from diseased channel catfish by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction. J Aquat Anim Health 10:22–27. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Arias CR, Shoemaker CA, Evans JJ, Klesius PH. 2003. A comparative study of Edwardsiella ictaluri parent (EILO) and E. ictaluri rifampicin-mutant (RE-33) isolates using lipopolysaccharides, outer membrane proteins, fatty acids, Biolog, API 20E and genomic analyses. J Fish Dis 26:415–421. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00475.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Panangala VS, Shoemaker CA, Klesius PH, Mitra A, Russo R. 2009. Cross-protection elicited in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus Rafinesque) immunized with a low dose of virulent Edwardsiella ictaluri strains. Aquac Res 40:915–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02185.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pridgeon JW, Klesius PH. 2011. Development of a novobiocin-resistant Edwardsiella ictaluri as a novel vaccine in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Vaccine (Auckl) 29:5631–5637. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bouras G, Sheppard AE, Mallawaarachchi V, Vreugde S. 2023. Plassembler: an automated bacterial plasmid assembly tool. Bioinformatics 39:btad409. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fukasawa Y, Ermini L, Wang H, Carty K, Cheung MS. 2020. LongQC: a quality control tool for third generation sequencing long read data. G3 (Bethesda) 10:1193–1196. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. Plos Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2016. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol 17:132. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Genome assemblies have been deposited to GenBank under the accession numbers CP180729, CP180732, CP180735, CP180738, CP180742, CP180746, CP180750, CP180752, CP180756, CP180759, CP180765.
Raw data (Illumina) can be found in the Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR32269917, SRR32269918, SRR32269919, SRR32269920, SRR32269921, SRR32269922, SRR32269923, SRR32269926, SRR32269936, SRR32269937, SRR32269938.
Raw data (Nanopore) can be found in the Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR32269924, SRR32269925, SRR32269927, SRR32269928, SRR32269929, SRR32269930, SRR32269931, SRR32269932, SRR32269933, SRR32269934, SRR32269935.
