Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2025 Aug 6;14(9):e00378-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00378-25

The FUNG-GROWTH database: linking fungal phenotype to genome

Ronald P de Vries 1,2,, Ad Wiebenga 1, Guillermo Aguilar Osorio 1,2, Maria Victoria Aguilar Pontes 1,3, Evy Battaglia 1,2, Tiziano Benocci 1,4, Isabelle Benoit Gelber 1,2,5, Ourdia Bouzid 1,2,6, Sara Casado Lopez 1, Nancy Coconi Linares 1, Alfons J M Debets 3, Jan F J de Jong 2, Elodie Drula 4, Daniel Falkoski 1,7, Jan Grijpstra 2,8, Birgit S Gruben 1,2, Sylvia Klaubauf 1, Claire Khosravi 1,9, Joanna E Kowalczyk 1,10, Roland S Kun 1,11, April J Liwanag 1, Ronnie J M Lubbers 1,12, Eline Majoor 1, Sakinie Misiedjan 1, Astrid Müller 1, Şebnem Ozturkoglu Budak 1,13, Aleksandrina Patyshakuliyeva 1, Diogo Robl 1,14, Blanca Trejo-Aguilar 1, Joost van den Brink 1,15, Yoni Visser 1, Alexandra Vivas-Duarte 1,2, Aniek Vugts 1,16, Miaomiao Zhou 1,17, Mao Peng 1, Pedro M Coutinho 4, Bernard Henrissat 5, Vincent Robert 6,18
Editor: Jason E Stajich7
PMCID: PMC12424322  PMID: 40767478

ABSTRACT

The utilization of plant biomass, polysaccharides, and associated monosaccharides is a crucial part of fungal physiology. With an increasing number of genomes, annotation can address differences in this process but often lacks detailed biological support. FUNG-GROWTH (https://www.fung-growth.org/) aims to provide and host this to improve genome analysis.

KEYWORDS: fungi, growth profiles, monosaccharides, polysaccharides, plant biomass

ANNOUNCEMENT

Plant biomass is a major resource for the sustainable circular economy, and fungi have an important role in its biorefinery (1). With an increasing number of fungal genome sequences available and automatic annotation of their carbohydrate-active enzymes (2) on the JGI Mycocosm portal (3), it is becoming easier to do genome-based comparison of the potential of fungal species for plant biomass valorization. However, a genomic potential is not always a direct reflection of a fungus’ ability or behavior, due to gene regulation and other factors, as has been demonstrated in a number of fungal genome studies (48). To provide physiological support for the genomic potential, we have performed growth profiles of ~400 fungal species, most with a public genome sequence, on a set of monosaccharides, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, and crude plant biomass. As fungi cannot import polysaccharides into the cell, the growth on these latter substrates provides insights into their extracellular enzymatic abilities, while the growth on the mono- and oligosaccharides provides insight into their metabolic abilities. The database allows comparative analysis of the fungi by using D-glucose and no carbon source as internal positive and negative controls, respectively, and by comparing the relative growth of another carbon source to these control conditions between fungi. In addition, it demonstrates the influence of the carbon source on fungal macromorphology (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Petri dishes contain fungal colonies with varying textures, margins, and growth patterns across different media types. Colonies differ in diameter, surface structure, and symmetry of distribution.

Example of the macromorphology diversity of fungi.

Growth profiles were generated using 10 monosaccharides (D-glucose, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-mannose, L-rhamnose, D-xylose, L-arabinose, D-ribose, D-galacturonic acid, and D-glucuronic acid), five oligosaccharides (cellobiose, maltose, lactose, sucrose, and raffinose), 11 polysaccharides (cellulose, starch, inulin, beechwood xylan, birchwood xylan, oat spelt xylan, guar gum, Arabic gum, apple pectin, citrus pectin, and arabinogalactan), seven crude plant biomass substrates (wheat bran, sugar beet pulp, citrus pulp, soybean hulls, rice bran, cotton seed pulp, and alfalfa meal), and three non-sugar conditions (no carbon source, casein, and lignin). All carbon sources were added to a minimal salt medium that was shown to be suitable for the species. For sporulating fungi, plates were inoculated with 2 µL of a 500 spores/μL fresh spore suspension in the center of the growth profile plates. For non-sporulating fungi, a ~1 mm stab from the periphery of a freshly grown plate with rich medium (e.g. malt extract agar) was placed on the center of the growth profile plates. The fungi were cultivated in duplicates until the fastest growing colony did not yet reach the edge of the plate. No significant variation in growth on the duplicate plates was observed. A representative picture was taken from each carbon source for each fungus and added to the database. For this, we used a Nikon digital camera D5100 with an AF Micro Nikkor 60 mm (1:2.8D) lens and automated settings. The plates were placed on black velvet, and a circular FalconEyes FLC-40 fluorescent light was used to prevent shadows from the Petri dish edges.

The Fungal Growth database and associated website (https://www.fung-growth.org/) were created using BioloMICS (Bioaware, Hanut, Belgium) (9). Currently, the database contains 398 fungi covering a large part of the width of the fungal kingdom. The database can be searched through its public website (https://www.fung-growth.org/), which also lists recipes of the different minimal media used.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ouafae Akkouh, Iris Allijn, Robert-Jan Bleichrodt, Dirk Blom, Christine Brussel, Rosa Caiazzo, Sacha Dalhuijsen, Christian de Rouw, Kryuss Facun, Enriquez Garcia del Pino, Thijs Gruntjes, Luis Jimenez Barboza, Aditi Joshi, Omid Kakay Afshary, Yagmur Karacelik, Tim Kroezen, Pieter Laghuwitz, Melissa Leeggangers, Krijn Leeuwis, Luuk Loeff, Charlotte Mens, Hari Mander Narang, Almar Neiteler, Sinisa Prelic, Jowhare Salah Meyran, Andreas Spelberg, Martin Tegelaar, Robson Tramontina, Nick van den Berg, Sjors van der Horst, Michiel van Diemen de Jel, Tom van Oorsouw, Esmeralda Voorbij, Coen Wouters, and Jennifer Yuzon for technical support.

G.A.O. was supported by a grant (07938) from the Dutch Foundation for Applied Science (STW) to R.P.dV. M.V.A.P., E.B., T.B., I.B., C.K., and J.K. were supported by a grant from the Dutch Technology Foundation STW (Applied Science division of NOW) and the Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs UGC 016.130.609 to R.P.dV. O.B. was supported by the European Union, Grant Agreement No.: 222699 (NEMO). N.C.L. was supported by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT) for financial support (Grant No. 263888). A.D. and R.J.M.L. were supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 720918 (FALCON) to R.P.dV. D.L.F. was supported by Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico (CNPq) with grant number 246763/2012-4. B.S.G. was supported by a grant of the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, the Applied Science division of NWO, and the Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs UGC 07938 to R.P.dV. R.S.K. was supported by a grant from the Applied Science division (TTW) of NWO and the Technology Program of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management 15807 to R.P.dV. A.J.L. was supported by the Marie Curie ITN network SuBiCat FP7 607044. E.M., M.P., and M.Z. were supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Netherlands Genomics Initiative 93511035 to R.P.dV. S.E.B. was supported by the IDB Merit PhD-Scholarship Programme for High Technology (86/TU/P30). A.P. was supported by grants of the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, Applied Science division of NWO and the Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs UGC 11108. D.R. was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) of Brazil. J.vd.B. was supported by a grant of the The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) of the China–Netherlands Joint Scientific Thematic Research Programme (jstp.10.005) to R.P.dV. A.V.D. was supported by a grant of the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, Applied Science division of NWO and the Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs UGC 07063 to R.P.dV.

Contributor Information

Ronald P. de Vries, Email: r.devries@wi.knaw.nl.

Jason E. Stajich, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

The database can be accessed at https://www.fung-growth.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1. de Vries RP, Mäkelä MR. 2020. Genomic and postgenomic diversity of fungal plant biomass degradation approaches. Trends Microbiol 28:487–499. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Drula E, Garron ML, Dogan S, Lombard V, Henrissat B, Terrapon N. 2022. The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: functions and literature. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D571–D577. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Grigoriev IV, Nikitin R, Haridas S, Kuo A, Ohm R, Otillar R, Riley R, Salamov A, Zhao X, Korzeniewski F, Smirnova T, Nordberg H, Dubchak I, Shabalov I. 2014. MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes. Nucl Acids Res 42:D699–D704. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Benoit I, Culleton H, Zhou M, DiFalco M, Aguilar-Osorio G, Battaglia E, Bouzid O, El-Bushari HBO, Coutinho PM, et al. 2015. Closely related fungi employ diverse enzymatic strategies to degrade plant biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:107. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0285-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Berka RM, Grigoriev IV, Otillar R, Salamov A, Grimwood J, Reid I, Ishmael N, John T, Darmond C, Moisan M-C, et al. 2011. Comparative genomic analysis of the thermophilic biomass-degrading fungi Myceliophthora thermophila and Thielavia terrestris. Nat Biotechnol 29:922–927. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. de Vries RP, Riley R, Wiebenga A, Aguilar-Osorio G, Amillis S, Uchima CA, Anderluh G, Asadollahi M, Askin M, Barry K, et al. 2017. Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus. Genome Biol 18:28. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1151-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Espagne E, Lespinet O, Malagnac F, Da Silva C, Jaillon O, Porcel BM, Couloux A, Aury J-M, Ségurens B, Poulain J, et al. 2008. The genome sequence of the model ascomycete fungus Podospora anserina. Genome Biol 9:R77. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Urquhart AS, Mondo SJ, Mäkelä MR, Hane JK, Wiebenga A, He G, Mihaltcheva S, Pangilinan J, Lipzen A, Barry K, de Vries RP, Grigoriev IV, Idnurm A. 2018. Genomic and genetic insights into a cosmopolitan fungus, Paecilomyces variotii (Eurotiales). Front Microbiol 9:3058. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Robert V, Szoke S, Jabas B, Vu D, Chouchen O, Blom E, Cardinali G. 2011. BioloMICS software: biological data management, identification, classification and statistics. TOAINFOJ 5:87–98. doi: 10.2174/1874136301005010087 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The database can be accessed at https://www.fung-growth.org/.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES