ABSTRACT
Here we report the draft genome of Roseomonas sp. strain GC11 isolated from a freshwater lake, occupying an old gravel quarry, in Belleview, Kentucky. The GC11 genome is 5.25 Mb and contains genes associated with complex carbohydrate degradation and a possible role in nitrite and thiosulfate reduction in aquatic habitats.
KEYWORDS: Roseomonas, genome sequence, freshwater lake, genomic characterization
ANNOUNCEMENT
The genus Roseomonas is commonly associated with hospital-acquired infections, particularly catheter-related cases (1, 2) and is a recognized human pathogen (3, 4). However, 16S rRNA surveys (5–7) and increasing numbers of environmental isolates (8–11) suggest that Roseomonas is more ecologically widespread than previously thought (12).
While characterizing bacterial diversity in urban and human-impacted aquatic habitats, we isolated and sequenced strain GC11 to explore its ecological role and metabolic potential. The genome of GC11 suggests involvement in nitrogen and sulfur cycling and contributes to our understanding of microbial diversity in restored ecosystems. Roseomonas sp. strain GC11 was isolated from a surface water grab collected aseptically in a WhirlPak bag containing a small amount of sediment from the shoreline of Conservancy Park Lake in Bellview, Northern Kentucky (38.992717°N, 84.823078°W), in September 2021. The lake occupies a former gravel pit, reclaimed and restored in 2007. The sample was serially diluted (1:10), plated on Reasoner’s 2A agar (RPI), and incubated at 25°C for 48 h. Colonies appeared distinctively pink with runny margins, consistent with previous Roseomonas descriptions (13). Genomic DNA was extracted from a single colony grown in Tryptic Soy Broth (RPI) and incubated at 25°C for 48 h. DNA was isolated using the Qiagen UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA concentration was measured using the Qubit 3.0 broad range kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and the sample was submitted for whole-genome sequencing (SeqCenter LLC, PA). Library preparation was performed using the Illumina Nextera XL Kit and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 2000 (2 × 151 bp), yielding 1,778,631 paired-end reads.
Reads were analyzed and assembled with KBase v2.3.2 (14). Quality control was performed with FastQC v0.11.9 (15), and the reads were trimmed using Nextera adapters with Trimmomatic v0.36 (16). Genome assembly was performed using SPAdes v3.15.3 (17), and genome completeness (100%) and contamination (0%) were assessed with CheckM v1.0.18 (18). Final annotations were generated with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v6.1 (19). Default parameters were used.
The assembly was 5,252,435 bp, across 212 contigs, with a GC% content of 70.72%, and an N50 of 53,914 bp. The average coverage was 93.7×, calculated with Qualimap v2.2.1 (20). The genome contains 4,941 genes, including 4,783 protein-coding genes, 52 tRNAs, and 4 noncoding RNAs. Initial classification with GTDB-Tk v1.7.0 (21) placed GC11 within the genus Roseomonas but showed a distant similarity to Roseomonas cervicalis ATCC 49957 (GCF_000164635.1). Species identity was then assessed with JSpeciesWS v3.8.2 (22), revealing 83.39% average nucleotide identity (ANI) with R. cervicalis ATCC 49957, calculated by ANIdb of the top six genomes selected by Tetra Correlation Search using z-scores. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) d4 values were 29.6% to R. cervicalis ATCC 49957 from Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) v3.3.3 (23), supporting its differentiation from known Roseomonas. Functional annotation using DRAM v0.1.0 (24), BlastKOALA v3.1 (25), and PGAP annotation suggests the involvement of Roseomonas in complex carbohydrate degradation, nitrite reduction (nirBD), and assimilatory sulfate reduction (cysNC, cysD, cysH, and sir) in aquatic biochemical processes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was conducted as part of an undergraduate course in General Microbiology (BIO 302L) and was supported by the Department of Biological Sciences at Northern Kentucky University.
We thank Giovanni Dos Santos Costa for the original isolation.
Contributor Information
Joshua T. Cooper, Email: cooperjo@nku.edu.
Elinne Becket, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, California, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRR19987100, BioProject under the accession number PRJNA734631, and BioSample under the accession number SAMN28844363. The whole-genome shotgun projects for Roseomonas sp. strain GC11 have been deposited in GenBank under the accession number JANFNY000000000. The version described in this paper is JANFNY000000000.1. The workflow for this genome assembly is within this static KBase narrative DOI: https://doi.org/10.25982/130563.7/2480634. BlastKOALA assignments are available at FigShare and are accessible at DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29586101.
REFERENCES
- 1. Abu Choudhury M, Wailan AM, Sidjabat HE, Zhang L, Marsh N, Rickard CM, Davies MR, McMillan DJ. 2017. Draft genome sequence of Roseomonas mucosa strain AU37, isolated from a peripheral intravenous catheter. Genome Announc 5:e00128–17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00128-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. De I, Rolston KVI, Han XY. 2004. Clinical significance of Roseomonas species isolated from catheter and blood samples: analysis of 36 cases in patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 38:1579–1584. doi: 10.1086/420824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bard JD, Deville JG, Summanen PH, Lewinski MA. 2010. Roseomonas mucosa isolated from bloodstream of pediatric patient. J Clin Microbiol 48:3027–3029. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02349-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kim YK, Moon JS, Song KE, Lee W-K. 2016. Two cases of bacteremia due to Roseomonas mucosa. Ann Lab Med 36:367–370. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.4.367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ke M, Xu N, Zhang Z, Qiu D, Kang J, Lu T, Wang T, Peijnenburg W, Sun L, Hu B, Qian H. 2022. Development of a machine‐learning model to identify the impacts of pesticides characteristics on soil microbial communities from high‐throughput sequencing data. Environ Microbiol 24:5561–5573. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wagner K, Besemer K, Burns NR, Battin TJ, Bengtsson MM. 2015. Light availability affects stream biofilm bacterial community composition and function, but not diversity. Environ Microbiol 17:5036–5047. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Grossart H, Jezbera J, Horňák K, Hutalle KML, Buck U, Šimek K. 2008. Top‐down and bottom‐up induced shifts in bacterial abundance, production and community composition in an experimentally divided humic lake. Environ Microbiol 10:635–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01487.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Xie Z, Wang L, Chen B, Liao B, Xiao B, Sun H. 2023. Roseomonas acroporae sp. nov., isolated from coral Acropora digitifera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. He D, Kim J-K, Jiang X-Y, Park H-Y, Sun C, Yu H-S, Yoon M-H, Kim S-C, Jin FX, Im W-T. 2014. Roseomonas sediminicola sp. nov., isolated from fresh water. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105:191–197. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-0065-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hirose S, Asano T, Hamada M, Morohoshi S, Kunihiro T, Hanada S. 2023. Roseomonas fluvialis sp. nov., an aerobic bacteriochlorophyll a-containing freshwater bacterium isolated from river epilithic biofilm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lee H-J, Whang K-S. 2022. Roseomonas rubea sp. nov., isolated from rice paddy soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 72. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kuzyk SB, Messner K, Plouffe J, Ma X, Wiens K, Yurkov V. 2023. Diverse aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs synthesize bacteriochlorophyll in oligotrophic rather than copiotrophic conditions, suggesting ecological niche. Environ Microbiol 25:2653–2665. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Romano-Bertrand S, Bourdier A, Aujoulat F, Michon A-L, Masnou A, Parer S, Marchandin H, Jumas-Bilak E. 2016. Skin microbiota is the main reservoir of Roseomonas mucosa, an emerging opportunistic pathogen so far assumed to be environmental. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:737. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, Dehal P, Ware D, Perez F, Canon S, et al. 2018. KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
- 16. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Okonechnikov K, Conesa A, García-Alcalde F. 2016. Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32:292–294. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2020. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Shaffer M, Borton MA, McGivern BB, Zayed AA, La Rosa SL, Solden LM, Liu P, Narrowe AB, Rodríguez-Ramos J, Bolduc B, Gazitúa MC, Daly RA, Smith GJ, Vik DR, Pope PB, Sullivan MB, Roux S, Wrighton KC. 2020. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res 48:8883–8900. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. 2016. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 428:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRR19987100, BioProject under the accession number PRJNA734631, and BioSample under the accession number SAMN28844363. The whole-genome shotgun projects for Roseomonas sp. strain GC11 have been deposited in GenBank under the accession number JANFNY000000000. The version described in this paper is JANFNY000000000.1. The workflow for this genome assembly is within this static KBase narrative DOI: https://doi.org/10.25982/130563.7/2480634. BlastKOALA assignments are available at FigShare and are accessible at DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29586101.
