ABSTRACT
Cryptosporidium serpentis is a protozoan parasite responsible for chronic clinical infections in reptiles, particularly snakes, leading to anorexia and lethargy. Here, we report the first metagenome-assembled genome of C. serpentis derived from a gastric lavage sample from the eastern indigo snake, Drymarchon couperi.
KEYWORDS: Cryptosporidium serpentis, metagenome, gastric lavage, Drymarchon couperi
ANNOUNCEMENT
Cryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite that infects a wide range of animal species. The genomes of 12 Cryptosporidium species have been sequenced from mammalian hosts. These species have been implicated as causative agents of intestinal disease including C. hominis, C. muris, and C. parvum. Another species, C. serpentis, has been described as a major parasite of snakes. Unlike other Cryptosporidium species, which are usually self-limiting, C. serpentis remains chronic and frequently causes mortality in infected snakes (1). Despite the pathogen’s significance in reptiles, no genomes of C. serpentis have been made publicly available before 2025. Here, we report the first metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) of C. serpentis, assembled from a gastric lavage sample from the eastern indigo snake, Drymarchon couperi. The genomic data will support accurate identification of C. serpentis from metagenomic data and future comparative genomic analysis between Cryptosporidium species.
An adult female eastern indigo snake was part of a C. serpentis comparative study (2) and tested positive for gastric cryptosporidiosis on histologic examination of a gastric mucosal biopsy, as described by Brownstein et al. (3). C. serpentis was identified in gastric lavage samples using a species-specific probe hybridization quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) assay, which targets the 18S rRNA gene (4). At the time of diagnosis, this snake had not been exhibiting clinical signs typically attributed to gastric cryptosporidiosis. One aliquot of the gastric lavage sample was frozen at −20°C, stored, and shipped overnight to the laboratory for analysis after 2 years.
DNA was extracted from the sample using the ZymoBiomics DNA Miniprep kit and libraries were prepared with the Illumina DNA Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol with 10 bp unique dual indexes. The libraries were quantified with Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and pooled together by equal abundance. The final pool was quantified using qPCR and sequenced on the Illumina Novaseq X, resulting in 174,607,253 reads with 151 bp length, for a total read length of 39,876,739,482 bp. Default parameters were used for bioinformatic tools unless otherwise stated. Read quality was assessed with FastQC v.0.11.8 (5) and reads were trimmed with TrimGalore v.0.5.0 (6). Host sequences were removed by mapping the reads to Drymarchon couperi (GCA_043091225.1) with BWA v.0.7.18 (7). The resulting unmapped reads were filtered with Kraken2 v.2.1.3 (8) against the EuPathDB46 database (http://ccb.jhu.edu/data/eupathDB) to remove bacterial sequences, resulting in the identification of 976,347 reads belonging to the Cryptosporidium lineage (Sar; Alveolata; Apicomplexa; Conoidasida; Coccidia; Eucoccidiorida; Eimeriorina; Cryptosporidiidae; Cryptosporidium). De novo genome assembly was performed with MetaSpades v.4.0.0 (9) and the metagenome was binned with MetaBat2 v.2.12.1, producing two bins (bin1 and unbinned) (10). Contigs shorter than 500 bp were removed using BBTools v.39.13 (11). The C. serpentis MAG was screened for contamination using the NCBI Foreign Contamination Screen tool (12) with the C. serpentis taxid (83999). Genome completeness was assessed using BUSCO v.5.8.2 (13) in genome mode against apicomplexa_odb10 and assembly statistics were collected using QUAST v.5.3.0 (14). Contigs containing telomeres were identified using find_telomeres.py. The resulting genome statistics are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Genome assembly statistics for the C. serpentis MAG presented in this announcement
| Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Number of contigs | 4,431 |
| Total genome size (Mbp) | 6.67 |
| Coverage (x) | 20.53 |
| N50 | 1,833 |
| Size of largest contig (Kbp) | 10.7 |
| BUSCO completeness (genome) | 84.8 |
| Contamination (bp) | 0 |
| Overall GC content (%) | 29.80 |
| Telomeres (forward) | 13 |
| Telomeres (reverse) | 12 |
| Contigs with forward and reverse telomeres | 0 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Central Florida Zoo’s Orianne Center for Indigo Conservation for providing the gastric lavage samples used to recover the genome presented in this announcement.
Contributor Information
Mark N. Yacoub, Email: myacoub@midogtest.com.
André O. Hudson, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
This Whole Genome Shotgun sequence data is available at NCBI under the BioProject PRJNA1234553. The Biosample is available under the accession SAMN47301767. The shotgun sequence reads are deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession SRR32652273. The genomic assembly is deposited under the accession JBMHIZ000000000. Ethical statements and additional sample collection information for the gastric lavage sample was previously published by Bogan et al. [2]. This study was approved by the Central Florida Zoo & Botanical Gardens Research Committee (Project 2023-03).
REFERENCES
- 1. Xiao L, Ryan UM, Graczyk TK, Limor J, Li L, Kombert M, Junge R, Sulaiman IM, Zhou L, Arrowood MJ, Koudela B, Modrý D, Lal AA. 2004. Genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in captive reptiles. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:891–899. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.891-899.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bogan James E, Mason AK, Mishel K, Garner MM, Walden HDS, Childress A, Wellehan JFX, Ossiboff RJ, Dahlhausen R. 2024. Comparison of sampling techniques and diagnostic tests for Cryptosporidium serpentis in eastern indigo snakes (Drymarchon couperi). Am J Vet Res 85:ajvr.24.05.0136. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.24.05.0136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Brownstein DG, Strandberg JD, Montali RJ, Bush M, Fortner J. 1977. Cryptosporidium in snakes with hypertrophic gastritis. Vet Pathol 14:606–617. doi: 10.1177/030098587701400607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bogan J.E, Wellehan JFX, Garner MM, Childress AL, Jackson B. 2022. Evaluation of a probe hybridization quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for Cryptosporidium serpentis in eastern indigo snakes (Drymarchon couperi). Parasitol Res 121:3523–3527. doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07676-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
- 6. Krueger F. 2015. Trim galore!: a wrapper around cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply adapter and quality trimming to FastQ files, with extra functionality for RRBS data. Babraham Institute. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. 2019. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol 20:257. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bushnell B, Rood J, Singer E. 2017. BBMerge - Accurate paired shotgun read merging via overlap. PLoS ONE 12:e0185056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Astashyn A, Tvedte ES, Sweeney D, Sapojnikov V, Bouk N, Joukov V, Mozes E, Strope PK, Sylla PM, Wagner L, Bidwell SL, Brown LC, Clark K, Davis EW, Smith-White B, Hlavina W, Pruitt KD, Schneider VA, Murphy TD. 2024. Rapid and sensitive detection of genome contamination at scale with FCS-GX. Genome Biol 25:60. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03198-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This Whole Genome Shotgun sequence data is available at NCBI under the BioProject PRJNA1234553. The Biosample is available under the accession SAMN47301767. The shotgun sequence reads are deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession SRR32652273. The genomic assembly is deposited under the accession JBMHIZ000000000. Ethical statements and additional sample collection information for the gastric lavage sample was previously published by Bogan et al. [2]. This study was approved by the Central Florida Zoo & Botanical Gardens Research Committee (Project 2023-03).
