Skip to main content
Clinical Microbiology Reviews logoLink to Clinical Microbiology Reviews
. 2025 Jun 4;38(3):e00129-25. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00129-25

Erratum for Kramer et al., ‘How long do bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses retain their replication capacity on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review examining environmental resilience versus healthcare-associated infection risk by “fomite-borne risk assessment”’

Axel Kramer , Franziska Lexow, Anna Bludau, Antonia Milena Köster, Martin Misailovski, Ulrike Seifert, Maren Eggers, William Rutala, Stephanie J Dancer, Simone Scheithauer
PMCID: PMC12424403  PMID: 40464547

ERRATUM

Volume 37, no. 4, e00186-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00186-23. Page 2: Line 2, “In vitro data from studies on 14 Gram-positive, 26 Gram-negative bacteria, 18 fungi, 4 protozoa, and 37 viruses” should read “In vitro data from studies on 14 Gram-positive bacteria, 26 Gram-negative bacteria, 18 fungi, 4 protozoa, and 37 viruses are considered here.”

Page 20: Table 7, row 12, Replication capacity for papillomavirus should read “>7 d.”


Articles from Clinical Microbiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES