Abstract
Autophagy is a critical host defense mechanism that restricts intracellular pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). A key step in this process is the ubiquitination of Mtb or Mtb-associated structures. The E3 ligase SMURF1 catalyzes K48-linked ubiquitination, promoting bacterial clearance. However, the function of its homolog, SMURF2, in host defense remains undefined. Here, we demonstrate that Smurf2 deletion in murine macrophages increases SMURF1 levels, enhances LC3B lipidation, augments K48 ubiquitination of Mtb-associated structures, and reduces intracellular Mtb replication. These effects are reversed by Smurf1 deletion, indicating that SMURF2 restricts autophagy in a SMURF1-dependent manner. Mice with myeloid-specific Smurf2 deletion exhibit modestly prolonged survival following aerosol Mtb infection. In human macrophages, SMURF2 knockdown or its pharmacological inhibition with the HECT ligase inhibitor Heclin reduces Mtb replication. Together, our findings identify SMURF2 as a negative regulator of selective autophagy and host immunity to Mtb and suggest that targeting SMURF2 may represent a novel host-directed therapeutic strategy for tuberculosis.
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, autophagy, SMURF2, ubiquitination, host-directed therapy
Introduction
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), is responsible for more than 10 million new cases and 1.3 million deaths each year, making it the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent worldwide (1). The airborne route of transmission, long latency period, and capacity for immune evasion all contribute to the persistence and global impact of TB. A recent analysis projected over 31 million TB-related deaths between 2020 and 2050, with a corresponding global economic loss of 17.5 trillion US dollars (1).
The standard treatment for TB relies on prolonged multidrug chemotherapy, typically requiring at least six months of adherence for drug-susceptible strains. This extended treatment duration, combined with limited diagnostic tools for early detection of drug resistance, has contributed to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Mtb strains (2). These challenges underscore the need for innovative therapeutic strategies that not only shorten treatment but also enhance host immune control of infection. Host-directed therapies (HDTs) aim to bolster the host immune response rather than directly targeting the pathogen, offering the potential to synergize with antibiotics, improve treatment outcomes, and overcome drug resistance (3, 4). However, realizing the promise of HDT requires a more detailed understanding of host cell-autonomous mechanisms that limit Mtb replication.
Autophagy is a conserved intracellular degradation pathway that maintains cellular homeostasis and promotes clearance of intracellular pathogens (5, 6). When the autophagic machinery encounters intracellular pathogens, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is engaged through the attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) molecules onto intracellular cargo, targeting the cargo for degradation (7–10). Ubiquitinated intracellular cargo is recognized by cargo receptors, such as sequestrosome-1 (SQSTM1/p62), calcium-binding and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 2 (CALCOCO2/NDP52), optineurin (OPTN), and neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1 (NBR1). These receptors contain both ubiquitin-binding domains (UBDs) and LC3-interacting regions (LIRs) that enable cargo delivery to LC3-decorated autophagosomes for subsequent degradation following lysosomal fusion (10–13).
The ubiquitination cascade is mediated by the sequential action of E1 activating enzymes, E2 conjugating enzymes, and E3 ligases, with E3 ligases conferring substrate specificity (14). A limited number of E3 ligases have been identified that ubiquitinate Mtb-containing structures with important roles in xenophagic control of infection (15–17). For example, tripartite motif-containing (TRIM) E3 ligases such as TRIM32 enhances autophagy in Mtb-infected human macrophages (18), PARKIN mediates K63-linked polyubiquitination and recruitment of p62 and NDP52 to Mtb-containing structures (19) and Smad-specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (SMURF1) promotes K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasome recruitment (10), highlighting distinct and non-redundant mechanisms of bacterial clearance (20).
E3 ligases are regulated by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation, sumoylation, and ubiquitination (21, 22). In breast cancer cells, SMURF2 negatively regulates SMURF1 by inducing its ubiquitination and degradation (23). SMURF1 and SMURF2 share a conserved structure with an N-terminal C2 domain for membrane binding, WW domains for protein-protein interactions, and a C-terminal HECT (homologous to the E6-AP carboxyl terminus) ubiquitin-ligase domain (24). Initially identified as negative regulators of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling (25, 26), SMURF1 and SMURF2 have since been implicated in diverse biological processes, including bone metabolism and host-pathogen interactions (10, 27, 28).
Although SMURF1 and SMURF2 share structural similarities and partially overlapping substrates, they also exhibit distinct functions. SMURF2 can induce the degradation of SMURF1, whereas SMURF1 does not affect SMURF2 stability (23). While both ligases are well studied in cancer biology (29, 30), their roles in cell-autonomous immunity remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that genetic deletion of Smurf2 in murine macrophages significantly enhances SMURF1 levels, LC3B lipidation, and autophagic targeting of Mtb, resulting in reduced bacterial replication. We further show that myeloid-specific Smurf2 deletion provides modest protection in a murine TB model and that SMURF2 inhibition in human macrophages, both genetically and pharmacologically, enhances bacterial clearance. These findings identify SMURF2 as a negative regulator of cell-autonomous immunity to Mtb and a potential target for host-directed therapy in tuberculosis.
Results
Smurf2 deletion in BV2 macrophages increases SMURF1 and LC3B-II levels and reduces intracellular Mtb growth
To examine the role of SMURF2 in cell-autonomous immunity, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to knock out Smurf2 in the BV2 mouse microglial cell line. We selected BV2 cells for their suitability in genetic manipulation and their prior use in studies of autophagy and mycobacterial pathogenesis (31–38). SMURF2-deficient BV2 cells showed a 60% increase in SMURF1 protein levels compared to wild-type controls (Figure 1A, 1B). To determine whether SMURF2 regulates intracellular Mtb replication, we infected BV2 wild-type and Smurf2 knockout (KO) cells with Mtb and measured bacterial burden by colony-forming unit (CFU) assay. While Mtb grew steadily in control BV2 cells, BV2 Smurf2 KO cells exhibited significantly reduced bacterial growth at days 2 and 3 post-infection (Figure 1C).
Figure 1: Murine macrophages lacking Smurf2 are more resistant to Mtb and show an increased LC3B lipidation.
A) Representative immunoblot analysis of SMURF2 and SMURF1 accumulation in BV2 wild type (WT) and BV2 Smurf2 knockout (KO) cells under basal conditions. B) Densitometric quantification of SMURF1 levels, as shown in (A) (mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, *p ≤ 0.05; unpaired t-test). C) Intracellular Mtb colony forming units (CFU) in BV2 WT and Smurf2 KO cells at different timepoints post-infection (mean ± SD of a representative experiment performed in quadruplicate, ns, non-significant, p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05 and ***p ≤ 0.001; two-way ANOVA). D) Representative immunoblot of LC3B-II levels in BV2 WT and Smurf2 KO cells under basal (UI) and at 4- and 24-hours post-infection (hpi). E) Densitometric quantification of LC3B-II levels, as shown in (D) (mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, ns, non-significant, p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05; two-way ANOVA).
We next examined whether loss of SMURF2 affects autophagy. Lipidation of Atg8 family proteins, including LC3B, is a key step in autophagosome formation (39) and is commonly assessed by monitoring the conversion of LC3B-I to LC3B-II (40, 41). LC3B-II levels were quantified by immunoblot in both BV2 wild-type and BV2 Smurf2 KO cells under both basal conditions and after 4 and 24 hours of Mtb infection. While there were no differences after 4 hours, LC3B-II was increased two-fold in SMURF2-deficient cells at 24 hours after infection (Figures 1D, 1E). These findings suggest that SMURF2 negatively regulates autophagy in Mtb-infected macrophages, potentially through its effect on SMURF1 stability.
K48-linked ubiquitin colocalization with Mtb is increased in BV2 Smurf2 KO macrophages
SMURF1 promotes K48-linked ubiquitination of substrates, targeting them for proteasomal degradation. We previously showed that loss of SMURF1 reduces K48-linked ubiquitin colocalization with Mtb in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) (10). Since SMURF1 levels were elevated in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells (Figure 1A, 1B), we hypothesized that K48-linked ubiquitination of Mtb-associated structures would be correspondingly increased in these cells. To test this, we infected BV2 wild-type and BV2 Smurf2 KO cells with Mtb expressing mCherry (Mtb-mCherry) and performed immunofluorescence microscopy to assess colocalization with K48-linked ubiquitin. BV2 Smurf2 KO cells exhibited a significant increase in K48-linked ubiquitin colocalization with Mtb-associated structures compared to wild-type controls (Figures 2A, 2B).
Figure 2: K48 and LC3B colocalize with Mtb in murine macrophages lacking Smurf2.
A) Representative immunofluorescence images of Mtb-mCherry (red) and K48 ubiquitin (green) in BV2 WT and BV2 Smurf2 KO cells. Images were captured 17 hours post-infection using an anti-K48 antibody. B) Quantification of Mtb-mCherry colocalization with K48 from (A) (mean ± SD of a 3 independent experiments, performed in triplicate, *p ≤ 0.05; unpaired t-test). C) Representative immunofluorescence images of Mtb-mCherry (red) with LC3B (green) in BV2 WT and Smurf2 KO cells. Images were acquired 17 hours post-infection using an anti-LC3B antibody. D) Quantification of Mtb-mCherry colocalization with LC3B from (C). (mean ± SD of a 3 independent experiments, performed in triplicate, ns, non-significant; unpaired t-test). Scale bar, 5 μm.
We next evaluated LC3B recruitment to Mtb-associated structures under the same conditions. Although LC3B colocalization was modestly increased in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells compared to BV2 wild type cells, the difference did not reach statistical significance (Figures 2C, 2D). These data indicate that Smurf2 deficiency enhances K48-linked ubiquitination of Mtb-associated structures, consistent with increased SMURF1 expression in BV2 Smurf2 KO macrophages.
Smurf2 deficiency impacts Mtb replication in a Smurf1-dependent manner
Given that Smurf2 deletion increased SMURF1 levels and that SMURF1 regulates selective autophagy during Mtb infection (10), we tested whether the phenotype observed in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells was dependent on SMURF1. We used CRISPR/Cas9 to generate BV2 Smurf1 KO and BV2 Smurf2/1 double KO cells and quantified SMURF1 and SMURF2 protein levels at baseline. As expected, SMURF1 was increased in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells, while SMURF2 levels were unchanged in BV2 Smurf1 KO cells (Figure 3A).
Figure 3: Smurf2 knockout impacts Mtb replication through SMURF1 in murine macrophages.
A) Immunoblot analysis to detect SMURF2 and SMURF1 in BV2 WT, Smurf2 KO, Smurf1 KO, and Smurf2/1 KO cells under basal conditions. B) Colony forming units (CFU) of Mtb in BV2 WT, Smurf2 KO, Smurf1 KO, and Smurf2/1 KO BV2 cells at different timepoints (mean ± SD of a representative experiment performed in quadruplicate, ns, non-significant, *p ≤ 0.05 and ***p ≤ 0.001; two-way ANOVA, with multiple comparisons). C) Immunoblot analysis of LC3B lipidation in BV2 WT, Smurf2 KO, Smurf1 KO, and Smurf2/1 KO cells, infected or not with Mtb (MOI 5) at 24 hours post infection. D) Densitometric quantification of LC3B-II levels, as shown in (C) (mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, ns, non-significant, **p ≤ 0.01; two-way ANOVA, with multiple comparisons).
We next infected BV2 wild-type, BV2 Smurf2 KO, BV2 Smurf1 KO, and BV2 Smurf2/1 KO cells with Mtb and measured intracellular bacterial burden over three days. Consistent with prior findings in mouse BMDMs (10), BV2 Smurf1 KO cells showed increased Mtb replication compared to wild-type cells. BV2 Smurf2/1 KO cells had bacterial burdens comparable to BV2 Smurf1 KO cells, indicating that the reduction in Mtb growth observed in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells requires SMURF1 (Figure 3B).
We also examined LC3B lipidation in these cell lines at baseline and after infection. BV2 Smurf2 KO cells showed increased LC3B-II levels, whereas no change in LC3B lipidation was observed in BV2 Smurf1 KO or BV2 Smurf2/1 KO cells (Figures 3C, 3D). This suggests that the effect of Smurf2 deletion on LC3B lipidation is not mediated by SMURF1. Together, these results indicate that SMURF2 restricts Mtb control through SMURF1-dependent mechanisms and modulates LC3B lipidation through a SMURF1-independent pathway.
SMURF2 complementation restores susceptibility to Mtb by decreasing SMURF1 protein levels
SMURF2 contains a conserved catalytic cysteine (C716) within its C-terminal HECT ubiquitin ligase domain, which is essential for its enzymatic activity (Figure 4A) (42). To confirm that the phenotype observed in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells was due to loss of SMURF2, we reconstituted SMURF2 expression by lentiviral transduction. In addition, to determine whether SMURF2 suppresses macrophage immunity to Mtb through its ligase function, we generated BV2 Smurf2 KO macrophages stably complemented with either wild type (WT) SMURF2 (Smurf2WT) or a catalytically inactive mutant, C716A (Smurf2C716A), which targets the active site cysteine. Immunoblot analysis confirmed successful re-expression of SMURF2 in the Smurf2WT-complemented cells. While the catalytic inactive SMURF2C716A mutant was also detected, its band intensity was significantly reduced compared to the SMURF2WT, suggesting lower protein abundance (Figure 4B). We previously observed that SMURF1 expression is increased in the absence of SMURF2 in BV2 cells (Figures 1A, 3A). Consistent with this, complementation with SMURF2WT in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells reduced SMURF1 levels (Figure 4C). In contrast, the SMURF2C716A mutant failed to reduce SMURF1 protein levels, similarly to what was observed in Smurf2 KO cells with the empty vector (EV) (Figure 4C). However, the inability to restore SMURF1 expression in SMURF2C716A mutant expressing cells may also be due to its reduced expression.
Figure 4: Complementation of BV2 Smurf2 KO cells for SMURF2 expression using a lentiviral plasmid and impact on Mtb luminescence.
A) Schematic of Smurf2 cDNA constructs cloned into a lentiviral vector, for CMV-driven expression of wild type (SMURF2WT) or mutant (SMURF2C716A) proteins in BV2 cells. B) Immunoblot analysis of SMURF2 in BV2 cell lysates transduced with either empty vector (EV) or the Smurf2 constructs shown in (A), under basal conditions, using ACTIN as a loading control with densitometry analysis of SMURF2/ACTIN ratio. C) Immunoblot analysis of SMURF1 in BV2 cell lysates transduced with EV or the Smurf2 constructs shown in (A), under basal conditions, using ACTIN as a loading control with densitometry analysis of SMURF1/ACTIN ratio. D) Luminescence from Mtb-pLUX in BV2 WT and Smurf2 KO cells, transduced with EV or the Smurf2 constructs shown in (A). Luminescence was measured at different timepoints (mean ± SD of a representative experiment performed in sextuplicate. ns, non-significant, *p ≤ 0.05 and **p ≤ 0.01; two-way ANOVA, with multiple comparisons).
To test the impact of SMURF2 complementation on Mtb replication, we infected the complemented cells with a luminescent Mtb strain encoding the entire firefly luciferase operon (Mtb-pLux) and quantified luminescence over three days. We used the Mtb-pLux strain in this and some subsequent experiments when testing multiple conditions simultaneously because the intracellular luminescence of the Mtb-pLux strain allows for rapid and continuous read-out of Mtb burden and comparable results to CFU plating (43, 44). As expected from prior CFU data (Figures 1C, 3B), BV2 Smurf2 KO cells transduced with an empty vector exhibited reduced Mtb replication relative to BV2 wild type cells. This phenotype was reversed by complementation with Smurf2WT but not by Smurf2C716A (Figure 4D). While we cannot exclude the possibility that the inability of SMURF2C716A to fully restore wild type phenotypes reflects reduced protein abundance rather than loss of catalytic function, these findings suggest that the E3 ligase activity of SMURF2 is required to promote intracellular Mtb replication in macrophages.
SMURF2WT, but not SMURF2C716A, restores K48-linked ubiquitin colocalization with Mtb and LC3B recruitment to Mtb-containing structures in BV2 Smurf2 KO macrophages
To determine whether SMURF2 regulates the recruitment of ubiquitin and autophagy machinery to Mtb, we assessed K48-linked ubiquitin and LC3B colocalization with Mtb-associated structures in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells complemented with either Smurf2WT or Smurf2C716A. BV2 Smurf2 KO cells transduced with an empty vector exhibited increased K48-linked ubiquitin colocalization with Mtb-associated structures (Figures 5A, 5B), consistent with earlier observations (Figure 2A). This phenotype was reversed by complementation with Smurf2WT, which restored K48-linked ubiquitin signal to levels observed in BV2 WT cells. In contrast, complementation with the catalytically inactive Smurf2C716A mutant failed to reduce K48 ubiquitin colocalization, indicating that SMURF2 ligase activity is required for this function (Figures 5A, 5B).
Figure 5: Smurf2 complementation reduces K48 ubiquitin and LC3B colocalization with Mtb in murine macrophages.
A) Representative immunofluorescence images of Mtb-mCherry (red) with K48 ubiquitin (green) in BV2 WT and Smurf2 KO cells, transduced with either an empty vector (EV), or the constructs shown in Figure 4. Cells were stained with an anti-K48 antibody 17 h after infection. B) Quantification of Mtb-mCherry colocalization with K48 as shown in (A) (mean ± SD of a 3 independent experiments, performed in triplicate, ns, non-significant, *p ≤ 0.05 and **p ≤ 0.01; unpaired t-test). C) Representative immunofluorescence images of mCherry-expressing Mtb (red) with LC3B (green) under the same conditions as in (A), using an anti-LC3B antibody. D) Quantification of Mtb-mCherry colocalization with LC3B as shown in (C) (mean ± SD of a 3 independent experiments, performed in triplicate, ns, non-significant; *p ≤ 0.05; unpaired t-test). Scale bar, 5 μm.
We next examined LC3B recruitment to Mtb-associated structures. A modest increase in LC3B colocalization was again observed in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells relative to wild type, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (Figure 5C, 5D). Complementation with Smurf2WT significantly reduced LC3B colocalization, restoring levels to those observed in BV2 wild type (EV) cells. In contrast, complementation with the Smurf2C716A mutant failed to reduce LC3B colocalization.
These results demonstrate that SMURF2 regulates the accumulation of K48-linked ubiquitin at Mtb-associated structures in a manner that depends on its catalytic activity, although differences in protein expression between SMURF2WT and SMURF2C716A may also contribute.
Primary mouse bone marrow derived macrophages lacking Smurf2 exhibit increased resistance to Mtb infection
To investigate the role of SMURF2 in primary macrophages, we generated mice with myeloid-specific deletion of Smurf2 by crossing Smurf2flox/flox mice (45) with LysMCre transgenic mice (46). Western blot analysis of bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMDMs) confirmed recombination at the Smurf2 locus, with an average 84% reduction in SMURF2 protein levels in LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs compared to littermate controls (Supplemental Figure 1).
To assess functional consequences of SMURF2 depletion, we infected Smurf2flox/flox and LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs with Mtb and quantified bacterial burden over a three-day time course. Like BV2 Smurf2 KO cells, LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs showed reduced intracellular Mtb replication compared to controls at day three post-infection (Figure 6A). We next examined additional molecular consequences of SMURF2 depletion. Immunoblot analysis confirmed reduced SMURF2 expression in LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs following infection (Figures 6B, 6C). However, in contrast to BV2 Smurf2 KO cells, while SMURF1 protein levels were modestly increased in LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs compared to controls after Mtb infection, these results were not statistically significant (Figures 6B, 6D). LC3B lipidation was also not significantly different between genotypes (Figures 6B, 6E).
Figure 6: LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox murine macrophages are more resistant to Mtb infection.
A) Colony-forming units (CFU) of Mtb in Smurf2flox/flox and LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs at different timepoints post-infection (ns, non-significant, and ***p < 0.001; two-way ANOVA). B) Representative immunoblot analysis showing SMURF2, SMURF1, and LC3B lipidation levels in protein lysates from Smurf2flox/flox and LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs, 24 hours post infection. C-E) Densitometric quantification of SMURF2, SMURF1, and LC3B-II levels as shown in (B), from three independent experiments (mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, ns, non-significant, **p < 0.01 and ****p < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA). F) Representative immunofluorescence images of Mtb-mCherry (red) with LC3B (green) in Smurf2flox/flox and LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs, using anti-LC3B antibody 17 hours after infection. G) Quantification of Mtb-mCherry colocalization with LC3B as shown in (F) (mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, performed in triplicate, ns, non-significant; unpaired t-test). Scale bar, 5 μm.
To further assess autophagic targeting of Mtb, we performed immunofluorescence analysis of LC3B colocalization with Mtb-mCherry. As in BV2 cells, LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs exhibited a modest increase in LC3B recruitment to Mtb-associated structures, but the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 6F, 6G).
These results indicate that partial depletion of SMURF2 in primary BMDMs is sufficient to reduce Mtb replication, although the associated changes in SMURF1 expression and LC3B lipidation are less pronounced than in BV2 Smurf2 KO cells. Residual SMURF2 expression in LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox BMDMs compared to BV2 Smurf2 KO cells may contribute to the more modest phenotype.
Smurf2 does not impact bacterial burden or lung pathology during Mtb infection in vivo
We next tested whether Smurf2 contributes to host defense against Mtb infection in vivo. LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox and littermate Smurf2flox/flox control mice were infected via aerosol with a low-dose inoculum of Mtb (~50 CFU) (Figure 7A) (47–49). At 7, 21, and 42 days post-infection, we quantified bacterial burden in the lungs, spleen, and liver. No significant differences in CFU were observed at any time point between groups (Figures 7B–D). To assess the impact of Smurf2 deletion on tissue pathology, lung sections were examined by histology at days 21 and 42 post-infection. LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox mice showed similar degrees of inflammation compared to Smurf2flox/flox controls (Figures 7E–G).
Figure 7: Smurf2 deficiency does not significantly impact Mtb infection in vivo.
A) Smurf2flox/flox and LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox mice were aerosol-infected with ~50 CFU Erdman Mtb. Mice were euthanized at different timepoints, and CFUs were enumerated in the (B) lungs, (C) liver, and (D) spleen at 7, 21, and 42 days post-infection (dpi) (n = 5 mice/group, mean ± SD of an experiment performed in quadruplicate, ns. p > 0.05; two-way ANOVA). E) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of lung sections from Mtb-infected mice at 21 and 42 dpi. Scale bar, 2.5 mm. F, G) Quantification of inflammatory areas in lung sections at 21- and 42-dpi, respectively, as shown in (E). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 5 mice/group, ns. p > 0.05, Mann-Whitney test). H-J) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of Smurf2flox/flox and LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox Mtb-infected mice (n = 21 animals/genotype), shown for (H) male and female mice, (I) male only, and (J) female only (exact p values are shown on the graph; Log-rank test).
We then monitored survival following aerosol infection. When male and female mice were analyzed together, survival curves were not significantly different (Figure 7H). However, sex-stratified analysis revealed that female LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox mice survived significantly longer than female Smurf2flox/flox littermates, while no survival difference was observed among males (Figures 7I, J).
These data indicate that myeloid-specific deletion of Smurf2 via LysMCre expression does not alter bacterial burden or lung pathology during acute Mtb infection but may modestly improve survival in a sex-dependent manner.
SMURF2 knockdown reduces Mtb intracellular replication in primary human macrophages
To determine whether SMURF2 contributes to Mtb control in human macrophages, we differentiated monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) from peripheral blood CD14+-monocytes isolated from healthy donors. hMDMs were transduced with lentiviral vectors encoding a non-targeting control short hairpin RNA (shRNA) or one of two independent shRNAs targeting SMURF2 (Figure 8A). Knockdown efficiency was analyzed by immunoblot, with varying degrees of SMURF2 depletion observed across the two shRNA constructs (Figure 8B). We then infected hMDMs with Mtb and quantified intracellular bacterial burden over a three-day time course by CFU analysis. Both SMURF2-targeting shRNAs significantly reduced Mtb replication compared to the non-targeting control (Figure 8C). Notably, cells transduced to express the shRNA that achieved more efficient SMURF2 knockdown (shRNA#2) also demonstrated a lower bacterial burden, suggesting a dose-dependent relationship between SMURF2 expression and Mtb growth in hMDMs. These data demonstrate that SMURF2 negatively regulates macrophage control of Mtb in primary human cells, supporting a conserved role for SMURF2 in suppressing cell-autonomous immunity across species.
Figure 8: SMURF2 knockdown reduces Mtb intracellular growth in primary CD14-positive human macrophages.
A) Schematic of the isolation and transduction of CD14+-enriched primary human macrophages (see Material and Methods for details). B) Representative immunoblot of SMURF2 in hMDMs from a single donor transduced with non-targeting shRNA (NT) or two different SMURF2 shRNA (#1 or #2). SMURF2 knockdown efficiencies are indicated below ACTIN bands. C) Intracellular Mtb CFU in hMDMs transduced as in (A), at different timepoints post-infection (mean ± SD of a representative experiment performed in quadruplicate, ns. p > 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01 and ***p ≤ 0.001; two-way ANOVA).
Pharmacologic inhibition of SMURF2 reduces Mtb replication and enhances LC3B recruitment in human macrophages
To evaluate whether pharmacologic inhibition of SMURF2 could enhance host control of Mtb, we treated hMDMs with Heclin, a small molecule that targets multiple HECT-type E3 ligases including SMURF2 (50). We infected hMDMs with Mtb-pLux, treated cells with increasing concentrations of Heclin, and measured luminescence over three days. Heclin reduced intracellular Mtb replication in a dose-dependent manner at all time points (Figure 9A). To determine whether Heclin directly affects Mtb viability, axenic Mtb cultures were incubated with Heclin or DMSO, and growth was measured by optical density. Heclin alone had no impact on axenic Mtb growth, confirming that the reduction in luminescence observed in macrophages was not due to a direct antimicrobial effect (Supplemental Figure 2).
Figure 9: Inhibition of SMURF2 by Heclin reduces Mtb intracellular growth in primary CD14+ human macrophages.
A) Luminescence from Mtb-pLUX in hMDMs exposed to either 0.1% DMSO (vehicle control) or increasing concentrations of Heclin, as indicated (see Material and Methods for details). Luminescence was measured at different timepoints (mean ± SD of a representative experiment performed in quadruplicate, ns. p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01 and ****p ≤ 0.0001; two-way ANOVA). B) Luminescence from Mtb-pLUX in BV2 WT and Smurf2 KO cells exposed to either 0.1% DMSO (vehicle control) or increasing concentrations of Heclin. Luminescence was measured at different timepoints (mean ± SD of a representative experiment performed in quintuplicate. ns. p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01 and ***p ≤ 0.001; two-way ANOVA, with multiple comparisons). C) Representative immunofluorescence images of Mtb-mCherry (red) and LC3B (green) in human macrophages exposed to either 0.1% DMSO (vehicle control) or 10 μM Heclin. D) Quantification of Mtb-mCherry colocalization with LC3B shown in (C) mean ± SD of a 3 independent experiments, performed in triplicate, **p ≤ 0.01; unpaired t-test). Scale bar, 5 μm.
Since Heclin inhibits several HECT ligases, including SMURF2 (IC50 6.8 μM), NEDD4 (IC50 6.3 μM), and WWP1 (IC50 6.9 μM) (50), we sought to determine whether its antibacterial effect in macrophages was mediated specifically through SMURF2. To do this, we infected both BV2 wild-type and BV2 Smurf2 KO cells with Mtb-pLux and treated them with increasing concentrations of Heclin. Like hMDMs, BV2 wild-type cells exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in Mtb replication, whereas BV2 Smurf2 KO cells were unresponsive to Heclin treatment but showed reduced bacterial levels similar to the highest tested Heclin concentration (Figure 9B). These results suggest that SMURF2 is the relevant HECT E3 ligase mediating the effect of Heclin in restricting Mtb replication.
To assess the effect of SMURF2 inhibition on autophagy, we quantified LC3B colocalization with Mtb-associated structures in Heclin- or vehicle-treated hMDMs. Heclin treatment significantly increased LC3B recruitment to Mtb-mCherry in hMDMs, consistent with enhanced selective autophagy (Figures 9C, D). We also attempted to assess K48-linked ubiquitin colocalization, but the K48-ubiquitin staining was inconsistent and could not be reliably quantified.
Together, these findings support a role for SMURF2 as a negative regulator of selective autophagy in human macrophages and demonstrate that its pharmacologic inhibition enhances both murine and human macrophage control of Mtb.
Discussion
Our findings identify SMURF2 as a negative regulator of autophagy-mediated, cell-autonomous immunity to Mtb. In murine macrophages, Smurf2 deletion increased SMURF1 abundance, enhanced K48-linked ubiquitination and reduced bacterial replication. We also observed a trend towards increased LC3B recruitment to Mtb associated structures in murine macrophages lacking SMURF2. These effects were lost in the absence of SMURF1, consistent with prior evidence that SMURF2 promotes SMURF1 degradation (23) and indicating that SMURF2 limits autophagy primarily by destabilizing SMURF1. We extended these observations to primary human macrophages, where both genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of SMURF2 increased LC3B recruitment and reduced Mtb growth without direct antibacterial effects on axenic growth. The concordance between murine and human data highlights a conserved mechanism across species and underscores the potential of SMURF2 targeting as a host-directed therapeutic approach for tuberculosis.
E3 ubiquitin ligases, including SMURF2, are central regulators of protein ubiquitination, influencing diverse immune processes such as lymphocyte development, antigen presentation, and immune evasion (51–53). While their antiviral functions are well described (27, 54, 55), the role of HECT E3 ligases in antibacterial immunity is less understood. Several ligases, including TRIM32, NEDD4, and SMURF1, promote autophagy-mediated Mtb clearance by enhancing bacterial ubiquitination or stabilizing key autophagy proteins such as BECN1 (18, 56). Other ligases, such as TRIM27, promote bacterial clearance by activating transcription factors like TFEB, independent of their ligase activity (57).
Mtb can also subvert host E3 ligases to favor its survival. For example, the Mtb PE/PPE protein PE5 hijacks the CRL2 complex to suppress cell-autonomous immunity and promote its intracellular replication (58), while Mtb Rv0222 interacts with ANAPC2 to dampen proinflammatory cytokine production (59). Finally, PPE36 promotes SMURF1-dependent ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of MyD88, limiting host inflammatory responses (60).
While SMURF2 deficiency enhanced bacterial clearance in vitro, its in vivo effects were more modest: overall bacterial burden and lung inflammation were unchanged, but female LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox mice exhibited prolonged survival compared to littermate controls. This observation, together with known sex-based differences in TB susceptibility (49, 61–63) and autophagy regulation (64), suggests that SMURF2 function may be influenced by biological sex and warrants further study.
Our experiments in human macrophages underscore the translational importance of these findings. SMURF2 knockdown or pharmacologic inhibition with Heclin significantly reduced Mtb replication without direct antibacterial effects, and increased LC3B colocalization with Mtb. The absence of the Heclin effect in Smurf2-deficient cells supports SMURF2 as its relevant target in this context, highlighting the potential for SMURF2 inhibitors as host-directed therapeutics.
Although autophagy has been widely studied as a cell-autonomous defense against intracellular pathogens, including Mtb, there is a lack of consensus from in vivo models regarding its protective function (65–68). Conflicting results from murine models may reflect differences in Mtb strain used, infectious dose, mouse background, specificity of gene deletion and duration of survival studies. Moreover, Mtb encodes virulence factors that modulate autophagy or promote autophagy evasion. For example, the secreted effector enhanced intracellular survival (Eis) inhibits autophagy initiation through modulation of host redox-dependent signaling and acetylation pathways (69, 70), while PE_PGRS47 inhibits autophagy initiation by interacting with Ras-related protein Rab1a (71, 72). Likewise, the SecA2 dependent protein export system exports effectors including protein kinase G (PknG) and secreted acid phosphatase (SapM) to block phagosome-lysosome fusion through blockade of the small GTPase Rab7 (73, 74). Mtb lipids, including phthiocerol dimycocerosates (PDIM) and sulfolipid-1 (SL-1), further impair phagosome maturation and autophagic targeting (75–78). These strategies underscore the importance of autophagy as a barrier to infection and suggest that Mtb has evolved multiple mechanisms to subvert it.
In contrast to the debated role of autophagy in TB pathogenesis in mice, evidence from human macrophages consistently supports its contribution to cell-autonomous defense. Genetic ablation of SMURF1 (10), IRGM (79), ATG7 (80) or ATG14 (80) in human macrophages increases mycobacterial replication, whereas inhibition of the deubiquitinase USP15, which counters PARKIN, decreases Mtb replication (81). Our findings add to this body of evidence by showing that both genetic and pharmacologic disruption of SMURF2 enhances Mtb clearance in primary human macrophages by stimulating autophagy. In addition, recent work demonstrates that calcium leakage following Mtb phagosome damage induces multimeric ATG8/LC3 lipidation, limiting bacterial replication through a noncanonical autophagy process (82). Together, these findings underscore that selective autophagy, through both canonical and noncanonical mechanisms, is a key component of human host defense against Mtb and a promising target for therapeutic intervention.
In summary, our data define SMURF2 as a negative regulator of autophagy-mediated control of Mtb and provide mechanistic insight into how E3 ligases shape cell-autonomous immunity. These findings support further exploration of SMURF2 as a therapeutic target for TB, particularly in combination with standard antimicrobial regimens.
Material and Methods
Mice
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) and were conducted in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th edition, National Academies Press, 2011). UTSW is accredited by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). To obtain LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox mice, we crossed LysMCre mice (strain 004781, Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) (46) with Smurf2flox/flox mice (a gift from Ying E. Zhang, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (45)). Genotyping of mice was performed according to the protocols provided for each strain on The Jackson Laboratory website. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from ear punches using a previously described protocol (83). All mice were maintained in a pathogen-free facility with a 12-hour light/dark cycle and fed ad libitum in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Bacterial strains
We used the Erdman strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) as the parental strain for this study. The Mtb mCherry-expressing strain has been described previously (10, 47, 84). The Erdman luminescent reporter strain was generated by transforming the parental Mtb strain with pMV306hsp+LuxG13 plasmid (a gift from Brian Robertson & Siouxsie Wiles (Addgene plasmid # 26161; http://n2t.net/addgene:26161; RRID:Addgene_26161) (85). Mtb cultures were grown to mid-log phase in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (Difco), supplemented with 10% Middlebrook OADC (BD), 0.5% glycerol, and 0.05% Tween-80 at 37°C using aseptic techniques in a Biosafety Level 3 laboratory. Strains were propagated with minimal passage to maintain virulence. Following growth of Mtb, bacteria were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and sonicated with three pulses lasting 7 seconds each, with an amplitude of 90% and 5-second rests between pulses. After sonication, the concentration of bacterial suspensions was determined by measuring optical density at 600 nm (OD600), using the formula: 1 OD600 = 3 × 108 bacteria/mL, and diluted in macrophage media prior to infection.
To assess the effect of the HECT E3 ligase inhibitor Heclin on Mtb growth, Erdman strain cultures were grown in 7H9 medium supplemented with 10% OADC, 0.5% glycerol, and 0.05% Tween-80 in the presence of either 10 μM Heclin or 0.1% DMSO (vehicle control). Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring OD600 at different time points.
Cell culture
The mouse microglial cell line BV2 was cultured in complete Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco), and 10 mM HEPES (Thermo Fisher) and maintained in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were isolated and cultured from 8–12 week old mice femurs and tibia as previously described (47). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from buffy coats of healthy donors using SepMate™ tubes (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) and enriched for CD14+ monocytes using MACS CD14+ microbeads (Miltenyi), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Adherent human macrophages (hMDMs) were obtained by culturing CD14+ monocytes in complete RPMI 1640 (supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin), with 10% inactivated human serum, and 50 ng/mL recombinant human M-CSF (R&D Systems) for 7 days. Lentiviral transductions for SMURF2 knockdown were performed using the protocol described below.
Lentiviral transduction for Smurf2 overexpression in BV2 cells
To achieve transgenic expression of SMURF2 in BV2 cells, we cloned full-length Smurf2 cDNA (Smurf2WT or catalytic-dead Smurf2C716A) (86) into the entry vector pENTR/D-TOPO, which contains a Myc-tag sequence. These constructs were then subcloned into the lentiviral GATEWAY destination vector pLENTI CMV Blast using the LR Clonase™ II enzyme mix (Thermo Fisher). All plasmids were sequenced to verify correct gene insertion. Lentiviral particles were generated by transfecting HEK293T cells with the lentiviral constructs along with the packaging vectors pMD2.G and psPAX2 using FuGene HD transfection reagent (Promega), following the manufacturer’s protocol. After 48 hours of incubation in 5% CO₂ at 37°C, virus-containing supernatants were collected, filtered through a 0.45 μm filter (Millipore), and added to BV2 cell cultures in the presence of 8 μg/mL Polybrene (Millipore). Cells were incubated in 5% CO₂ at 37°C for 16 hours, when the medium was replaced with fresh complete DMEM containing 4 μg/mL blasticidin. The medium was changed every other day until resistant cell populations were established.
Lentiviral Transduction for SMURF2 Knockdown in human monocyte-derived macrophages
shRNAs were used to induce sequence-specific SMURF2 knockdown in hMDMs. shRNA synthetic molecules (clone TRCN0000003477, target sequence: CGCCTCAAAGACACTGGTTAT; clone TRCN0000003478, target sequence: CCACCCTATGAAAGCTATGAA) were obtained from Sigma, with a non-targeting sequence serving as a control. Lentiviral particles containing shRNAs were produced in HEK293T cells as described previously.
Human MDMs were transduced on day 4 of differentiation by adding lentivirus-containing supernatants to the cultures in the presence of 8 μg/mL Polybrene (Millipore). Cells were transduced via spinoculation at 800 × g for 1 hour at 30°C. Following transduction, the medium was replaced with fresh complete RPMI 1640 supplemented with 50 ng GM-CSF. On day 5, the medium was replaced with GM-CSF-free RPMI 1640 containing 2 μg/mL puromycin for selection. On day 7, MDMs were infected with Mtb, as described below. Knockdown (KD) efficiency was calculated as the percentage decrease in the SMURF2/ACTIN ratio in SMURF2 shRNA-transduced cells relative to Non-target shRNA-transduced cells.
Intracellular quantification of Mtb
To enumerate the number of intracellular bacteria by colony-forming units (CFU) method, we infected macrophages with Mtb at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. After phagocytosis, cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed at different time points with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS. Serial dilutions were plated on 7H11 plates supplemented with 10% OADC, 0.5% glycerol, and 50 μg/mL cycloheximide, and grown for 3 to 4 weeks at 37°C.
To monitor intracellular mycobacterial growth by luminescence, we infected macrophages with the luminescent reporter strain at a MOI of 3, and after phagocytosis, cells were washed twice with PBS and fresh media was added to each well prior to the measurement. Luminescence was measured using a BioTek Synergy Neo2 Hybrid Multimode Reader every 24 hours for 3 days.
To assess the effect of the HECT E3 ligase inhibitor Heclin (Sigma) on intracellular Mtb quantification, cells were treated with different concentrations of the inhibitor (diluted in DMSO) after phagocytosis and before cell lysis for Western blot or bacterial growth in macrophages.
Western blot
Cells were seeded at 5 × 105 cells per well in 12-well plates and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 hours prior to infection with parental Mtb at a MOI of 5. After phagocytosis, cells were maintained in complete DMEM with or without 0.1% DMSO or 10 μM Heclin. At different time points, cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling) supplemented with cOmplete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and Halt™ phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Lysates were incubated on ice for 20 minutes, then collected and filtered twice through a 0.2 μm filter (Millipore). Laemmli sample buffer was added, and samples were boiled for 3 minutes. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE using 4–20% polyacrylamide resolving gel (Bio-Rad). After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes and blocked with 5% BSA in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T). To detect SMURF2, SMURF1, and LC3B, the following antibodies were used: anti-LC3B (Novus), SMURF2 (Cell Signaling), SMURF1 (Santa Cruz), respectively. Anti-β-ACTIN (Santa Cruz) was used as a loading control. Membranes were developed using Clarity Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad).
Immunofluorescence analysis
Cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells per well in 24-well plates with glass coverslips and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 hours prior to infection with mCherry-expressing Mtb at a MOI of 1 for 17 hours. Coverslips were then washed twice with PBS, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for 16 hours at 4°C, and washed twice again in PBS. For K48 ubiquitin staining, coverslips were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton-X-100 in PBS (PBS-T) for 15 min, blocked with 3% BSA in PBS-T for 1 h and incubated with humanized anti-K48 ubiquitin antibody (Genentech) for 1 h at room temperature. Coverslips were then washed 3x with PBS and incubated with Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Thermo Fisher) for 1 h at room temperature, protected from light. For LC3B staining, coverslips were permeabilized with 100% methanol for 6 min at −20°C, blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 h and incubated with rabbit anti-LC3B (Novus) for 1 h at room temperature. Coverslips were then washed 3x with PBS and incubated with Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature, protected from light. After three additional washes with PBS, all coverslips were mounted using ProLong™ Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI and sealed with nail polish. Slides were visualized using a Nikon CSU-W1 SoRa spinning disk confocal microscope with a 60x objective. Colocalization event counting was performed in a blind manner, with samples numbered to prevent investigator bias.
Low dose aerosol infection of mice with M. tuberculosis
Smurf2flox/flox and LysMCre+/− Smurf2flox/flox mice were infected via aerosol as previously described (47, 65). Briefly, mid-log-phase parental Mtb were washed three times with PBS, sonicated as described above and resuspended in PBS to an OD600 of 0.1 in PBS. Bacterial suspensions were used to infect mice in a GlasCol aerosol chamber (GlasCol Inc.), with an inoculum of approximately 50 bacteria per mouse. On day 0, both lungs from five mice were plated to determine the initial bacterial load. At 7, 21, and 42 days post-infection, lungs, liver, and spleen were collected, homogenized in PBS, and plated on 7H11 agar plates for CFU enumeration. For survival studies, mice were weighed weekly and euthanized upon reaching 15% loss of their maximum body weight, threshold marker of imminent death, as has been previously reported (47).
Histological analysis
The left lung lobe from each mouse was collected at indicated time points and fixed in 10% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2. Tissues were then transferred to 70% ethanol and submitted to the Molecular Pathology Core Facility at UT Southwestern for paraffin embedding, sectioning (5 μm thickness), and Hematoxylin & Eosin staining. Slides were scanned at 20X magnification using a NanoZoomer S60 digital slide scanner. The percentage of inflammation per tissue was subsequently calculated using ImageJ by observers blinded to mouse genotype.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software (version 10). For in vitro studies, data were analyzed using unpaired, 2-tailed t-test for comparisons between two groups, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparisons with more than two groups. For in vivo studies, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for nonparametric comparisons between 2 groups of mice. For mouse mortality studies, Kaplan-Meyer survival curves were generated and analyzed through log-rank tests to determine statistical significance. Densitometric analysis of immunoblots was performed using ImageJ software (version 1.54f). The specific statistical tests used are indicated in the figure legends.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Ying E. Zhang (NCI/CCR, Bethesda, MD, USA) for the Smurf2flox/flox mice, and Luis Franco (Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) for valuable feedback on experiments. The authors also thank core facilities at UT Southwestern Medical Center for their important contributions to this work. We thank the UT Southwestern Quantitative Light Microscopy Core, particularly the core director Marcel Mettlen, a Shared Resource of the Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, supported in part by an NCI Cancer Center Support Grant, 1P30 CA142543–01. The Nikon SoRa spinning disk microscope was purchased with a shared instrumentation grant from NIH, 1S10OD028630–01 to Katherine Luby-Phelps. We also thank the Histo Pathology Core, particularly John Shelton and the Whole Brain Microscopy Facility core director Denise Ramirez.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health U19 AI142784 and R01 AI187291 (M.U.S), T32 HL098040 (K.C.R.) and T32 AI007520 (K.F.N).
Footnotes
Competing interests
All authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Silva S, Arinaminpathy N, Atun R, Goosby E, and Reid M. Economic impact of tuberculosis mortality in 120 countries and the cost of not achieving the Sustainable Development Goals tuberculosis targets: a full-income analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(10):e1372–e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mancuso G, Midiri A, De Gaetano S, Ponzo E, and Biondo C. Tackling Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: New Challenges from the Old Pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microorganisms. 2023;11(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Udinia S, Suar M, and Kumar D. Host-directed therapy against tuberculosis: Concept and recent developments. J Biosci. 2023;48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wallis RS, O’Garra A, Sher A, and Wack A. Host-directed immunotherapy of viral and bacterial infections: past, present and future. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23(2):121–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen T, Tu S, Ding L, Jin M, Chen H, and Zhou H. The role of autophagy in viral infections. J Biomed Sci. 2023;30(1):5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee JS, Dittmar M, Miller J, Li M, Ayyanathan K, Ferretti M, et al. Pressure to evade cell-autonomous innate sensing reveals interplay between mitophagy, IFN signaling, and SARS-CoV-2 evolution. Cell Rep. 2025;44(1):115115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shariq M, Quadir N, Alam A, Zarin S, Sheikh JA, Sharma N, et al. The exploitation of host autophagy and ubiquitin machinery by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in shaping immune responses and host defense during infection. Autophagy. 2023;19(1):3–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chandra P, Grigsby SJ, and Philips JA. Immune evasion and provocation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20(12):750–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tripathi-Giesgen I, Behrends C, and Alpi AF. The ubiquitin ligation machinery in the defense against bacterial pathogens. EMBO Rep. 2021;22(11):e52864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Franco LH, Nair VR, Scharn CR, Xavier RJ, Torrealba JR, Shiloh MU, et al. The Ubiquitin Ligase Smurf1 Functions in Selective Autophagy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Anti-tuberculous Host Defense. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21(1):59–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goodall EA, Kraus F, and Harper JW. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitin-driven selective mitochondrial and bacterial autophagy. Mol Cell. 2022;82(8):1501–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ravenhill BJ, Boyle KB, von Muhlinen N, Ellison CJ, Masson GR, Otten EG, et al. The Cargo Receptor NDP52 Initiates Selective Autophagy by Recruiting the ULK Complex to Cytosol-Invading Bacteria. Mol Cell. 2019;74(2):320–9 e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Adriaenssens E, Ferrari L, and Martens S. Orchestration of selective autophagy by cargo receptors. Curr Biol. 2022;32(24):R1357–R71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dikic I, and Schulman BA. An expanded lexicon for the ubiquitin code. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24(4):273–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Saavedra-Sanchez L, Dickinson MS, Apte S, Zhang Y, de Jong M, Skavicus S, et al. The Shigella flexneri effector IpaH1.4 facilitates RNF213 degradation and protects cytosolic bacteria against interferon-induced ubiquitylation. bioRxiv. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bilkei-Gorzo O, Heunis T, Marin-Rubio JL, Cianfanelli FR, Raymond BBA, Inns J, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF115 regulates phagosome maturation and host response to bacterial infection. EMBO J. 2022;41(23):e108970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Raykov L, Mottet M, Nitschke J, and Soldati T. A TRAF-like E3 ubiquitin ligase TrafE coordinates ESCRT and autophagy in endolysosomal damage response and cell-autonomous immunity to Mycobacterium marinum. Elife. 2023;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Romagnoli A, Di Rienzo M, Petruccioli E, Fusco C, Palucci I, Micale L, et al. The ubiquitin ligase TRIM32 promotes the autophagic response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in macrophages. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(8):505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Manzanillo PS, Ayres JS, Watson RO, Collins AC, Souza G, Rae CS, et al. The ubiquitin ligase parkin mediates resistance to intracellular pathogens. Nature. 2013;501(7468):512–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Campos PC, Cunha DT, Souza-Costa LP, Shiloh MU, and Franco LH. Bag it, tag it: ubiquitin ligases and host resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol. 2022;30(10):973–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Song L, and Luo ZQ. Post-translational regulation of ubiquitin signaling. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(6):1776–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barbour H, Nkwe NS, Estavoyer B, Messmer C, Gushul-Leclaire M, Villot R, et al. An inventory of crosstalk between ubiquitination and other post-translational modifications in orchestrating cellular processes. iScience. 2023;26(5):106276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fukunaga E, Inoue Y, Komiya S, Horiguchi K, Goto K, Saitoh M, et al. Smurf2 induces ubiquitin-dependent degradation of Smurf1 to prevent migration of breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(51):35660–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ruetalo N, Anders S, Stollmaier C, Jackl M, Schutz-Stoffregen MC, Stefan N, et al. The WW1 Domain Enhances Autoinhibition in Smurf Ubiquitin Ligases. J Mol Biol. 2019;431(24):4834–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu M, Wu S, Chen W, and Li YP. The roles and regulatory mechanisms of TGF-beta and BMP signaling in bone and cartilage development, homeostasis and disease. Cell Res. 2024;34(2):101–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu J, Jin J, Liang T, and Feng XH. To Ub or not to Ub: a regulatory question in TGF-beta signaling. Trends Biochem Sci. 2022;47(12):1059–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pan Y, Li R, Meng JL, Mao HT, Zhang Y, and Zhang J. Smurf2 negatively modulates RIG-I-dependent antiviral response by targeting VISA/MAVS for ubiquitination and degradation. J Immunol. 2014;192(10):4758–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Souza-Costa LP, Santos FRS, Pimenta JC, Queiroz-Junior CM, Tana FL, Teixeira DC, et al. E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Smurf1 Regulates the Inflammatory Response in Macrophages and Attenuates Hepatic Damage during Betacoronavirus Infection. Pathogens. 2024;13(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fu L, Cui CP, Zhang X, and Zhang L. The functions and regulation of Smurfs in cancers. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;67(Pt 2):102–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Youssef E, Zhao S, Purcell C, Olson GL, and El-Deiry WS. Targeting the SMURF2-HIF1alpha axis: a new frontier in cancer therapy. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1484515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Baldridge MT, Lee S, Brown JJ, McAllister N, Urbanek K, Dermody TS, et al. Expression of Ifnlr1 on Intestinal Epithelial Cells Is Critical to the Antiviral Effects of Interferon Lambda against Norovirus and Reovirus. J Virol. 2017;91(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Urbanek K, Sutherland DM, Orchard RC, Wilen CB, Knowlton JJ, Aravamudhan P, et al. Cytidine Monophosphate N-Acetylneuraminic Acid Synthetase and Solute Carrier Family 35 Member A1 Are Required for Reovirus Binding and Infection. J Virol. 2020;95(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McAllaster MR, Bhushan J, Balce DR, Orvedahl A, Park A, Hwang S, et al. Autophagy gene-dependent intracellular immunity triggered by interferon-gamma. mBio. 2023;14(6):e0233223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lefrancois LH, Nitschke J, Wu H, Panis G, Prados J, Butler RE, et al. Temporal genome-wide fitness analysis of Mycobacterium marinum during infection reveals the genetic requirement for virulence and survival in amoebae and microglial cells. mSystems. 2024;9(2):e0132623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li Y, Zhou D, Ren Y, Zhang Z, Guo X, Ma M, et al. Mir223 restrains autophagy and promotes CNS inflammation by targeting ATG16L1. Autophagy. 2019;15(3):478–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sheng G, Chu H, Duan H, Wang W, Tian N, Liu D, et al. LRRC25 Inhibits IFN-gamma Secretion by Microglia to Negatively Regulate Anti-Tuberculosis Immunity in Mice. Microorganisms. 2023;11(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Trofimov V, Kicka S, Mucaria S, Hanna N, Ramon-Olayo F, Del Peral LV, et al. Antimycobacterial drug discovery using Mycobacteria-infected amoebae identifies anti-infectives and new molecular targets. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang CS, Lee HM, Lee JY, Kim JA, Lee SJ, Shin DM, et al. Reactive oxygen species and p47phox activation are essential for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced pro-inflammatory response in murine microglia. J Neuroinflammation. 2007;4:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Deretic V, Duque T, Trosdal E, Paddar M, Javed R, and Akepati P. Membrane atg8ylation in Canonical and Noncanonical Autophagy. J Mol Biol. 2024;436(15):168532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Klionsky DJ, Abdel-Aziz AK, Abdelfatah S, Abdellatif M, Abdoli A, Abel S, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)(1). Autophagy. 2021;17(1):1–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, and Levine B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell. 2010;140(3):313–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Du JX, Hagos EG, Nandan MO, Bialkowska AB, Yu B, and Yang VW. The E3 ubiquitin ligase SMAD ubiquitination regulatory factor 2 negatively regulates Kruppel-like factor 5 protein. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(46):40354–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kong Y, Yang D, Cirillo SL, Li S, Akin A, Francis KP, et al. Application of Fluorescent Protein Expressing Strains to Evaluation of Anti-Tuberculosis Therapeutic Efficacy In Vitro and In Vivo. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sharma S, Gelman E, Narayan C, Bhattacharjee D, Achar V, Humnabadkar V, et al. Simple and rapid method to determine antimycobacterial potency of compounds by using autoluminescent Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(10):5801–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tang Y, Tang LY, Xu X, Li C, Deng C, and Zhang YE. Generation of Smurf2 Conditional Knockout Mice. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14(5):542–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, Renkawitz R, and Forster I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res. 1999;8(4):265–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Collins AC, Cai H, Li T, Franco LH, Li XD, Nair VR, et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is an Innate Immune DNA Sensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(6):820–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Plumlee CR, Duffy FJ, Gern BH, Delahaye JL, Cohen SB, Stoltzfus CR, et al. Ultra-low Dose Aerosol Infection of Mice with Mycobacterium tuberculosis More Closely Models Human Tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(1):68–82 e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hertz D, Dibbern J, Eggers L, von Borstel L, and Schneider BE. Increased male susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is associated with smaller B cell follicles in the lungs. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mund T, Lewis MJ, Maslen S, and Pelham HR. Peptide and small molecule inhibitors of HECT-type ubiquitin ligases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(47):16736–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang Y, Argiles-Castillo D, Kane EI, Zhou A, and Spratt DE. HECT E3 ubiquitin ligases - emerging insights into their biological roles and disease relevance. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shao S, Zhou D, Feng J, Liu Y, Baturuhu, Yin H, et al. Regulation of inflammation and immunity in sepsis by E3 ligases. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1124334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gao P, Ma X, Yuan M, Yi Y, Liu G, Wen M, et al. E3 ligase Nedd4l promotes antiviral innate immunity by catalyzing K29-linked cysteine ubiquitination of TRAF3. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yu M, Li J, Gao W, Li Z, and Zhang W. Multiple E3 ligases act as antiviral factors against SARS-CoV-2 via inducing the ubiquitination and degradation of ORF9b. J Virol. 2024;98(6):e0162423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Novelli G, Liu J, Biancolella M, Alonzi T, Novelli A, Patten JJ, et al. Inhibition of HECT E3 ligases as potential therapy for COVID-19. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(4):310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pei G, Buijze H, Liu H, Moura-Alves P, Goosmann C, Brinkmann V, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase NEDD4 enhances killing of membrane-perturbing intracellular bacteria by promoting autophagy. Autophagy. 2017;13(12):2041–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhao D, Qiang L, Lei Z, Ge P, Lu Z, Wang Y, et al. TRIM27 elicits protective immunity against tuberculosis by activating TFEB-mediated autophagy flux. Autophagy. 2024;20(7):1483–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Madduri B, Vehra O, Han A, Radeny J, Resstel C, and Bell SL. Mycobacterium tuberculosis effector protein PE5 hijacks the host CRL2 ubiquitin ligase complex. bioRxiv. 2025. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang L, Wu J, Li J, Yang H, Tang T, Liang H, et al. Host-mediated ubiquitination of a mycobacterial protein suppresses immunity. Nature. 2020;577(7792):682–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Peng Z, Yue Y, and Xiong S. Mycobacterial PPE36 Modulates Host Inflammation by Promoting E3 Ligase Smurf1-Mediated MyD88 Degradation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:690667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Peer V, Schwartz N, and Green MS. Gender differences in tuberculosis incidence rates-A pooled analysis of data from seven high-income countries by age group and time period. Front Public Health. 2022;10:997025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hertz D, and Schneider B. Sex differences in tuberculosis. Semin Immunopathol. 2019;41(2):225–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gupta M, Srikrishna G, Klein SL, and Bishai WR. Genetic and hormonal mechanisms underlying sex-specific immune responses in tuberculosis. Trends Immunol. 2022;43(8):640–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Carosi JM, Martin A, Hein LK, Hassiotis S, Hattersley KJ, Turner BJ, et al. Autophagy across tissues of aging mice. PLoS One. 2025;20(6):e0325505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Golovkine GR, Roberts AW, Morrison HM, Rivera-Lugo R, McCall RM, Nilsson H, et al. Autophagy restricts Mycobacterium tuberculosis during acute infection in mice. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8(5):819–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Feng S, McNehlan ME, Kinsella RL, Sur Chowdhury C, Chavez SM, Naik SK, et al. Autophagy promotes efficient T cell responses to restrict high-dose Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9(3):684–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kinsella RL, Kimmey JM, Smirnov A, Woodson R, Gaggioli MR, Chavez SM, et al. Autophagy prevents early proinflammatory responses and neutrophil recruitment during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection without affecting pathogen burden in macrophages. PLoS Biol. 2023;21(6):e3002159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ge P, Lei Z, Yu Y, Lu Z, Qiang L, Chai Q, et al. M. tuberculosis PknG manipulates host autophagy flux to promote pathogen intracellular survival. Autophagy. 2022;18(3):576–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kim KH, An DR, Song J, Yoon JY, Kim HS, Yoon HJ, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Eis protein initiates suppression of host immune responses by acetylation of DUSP16/MKP-7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(20):7729–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shin DM, Jeon BY, Lee HM, Jin HS, Yuk JM, Song CH, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis eis regulates autophagy, inflammation, and cell death through redox-dependent signaling. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(12):e1001230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Saini NK, Baena A, Ng TW, Venkataswamy MM, Kennedy SC, Kunnath-Velayudhan S, et al. Suppression of autophagy and antigen presentation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE_PGRS47. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(9):16133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Strong EJ, Ng TW, Porcelli SA, and Lee S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE_PGRS20 and PE_PGRS47 Proteins Inhibit Autophagy by Interaction with Rab1A. mSphere. 2021;6(4):e0054921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hu D, Wu J, Wang W, Mu M, Zhao R, Xu X, et al. Autophagy regulation revealed by SapM-induced block of autophagosome-lysosome fusion via binding RAB7. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;461(2):401–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zulauf KE, Sullivan JT, and Braunstein M. The SecA2 pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exports effectors that work in concert to arrest phagosome and autophagosome maturation. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(4):e1007011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mittal E, and Philips JA. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipid, PDIM, inhibits the NADPH oxidase and autophagy. Autophagy. 2025;21(3):684–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mittal E, Prasad G, Upadhyay S, Sadadiwala J, Olive AJ, Yang G, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence lipid PDIM inhibits autophagy in mice. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9(11):2970–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Quigley J, Hughitt VK, Velikovsky CA, Mariuzza RA, El-Sayed NM, and Briken V. The Cell Wall Lipid PDIM Contributes to Phagosomal Escape and Host Cell Exit of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. mBio. 2017;8(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bah A, Sanicas M, Nigou J, Guilhot C, Astarie-Dequeker C, and Vergne I. The Lipid Virulence Factors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Exert Multilayered Control over Autophagy-Related Pathways in Infected Human Macrophages. Cells. 2020;9(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Singh SB, Davis AS, Taylor GA, and Deretic V. Human IRGM induces autophagy to eliminate intracellular mycobacteria. Science. 2006;313(5792):1438–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Aylan B, Bernard EM, Pellegrino E, Botella L, Fearns A, Athanasiadi N, et al. ATG7 and ATG14 restrict cytosolic and phagosomal Mycobacterium tuberculosis replication in human macrophages. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8(5):803–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rahlwes KC, Campos PC, Dias BRS, Parraga PK, and Shiloh MU. Deubiquitinase USP15 restricts autophagy and macrophage immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. bioRxiv. 2025:2025.08.06.668987. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Chen D, Fearns A, and Gutierrez MG. Mycobacterium tuberculosis phagosome Ca(2+) leakage triggers multimembrane ATG8/LC3 lipidation to restrict damage in human macrophages. Sci Adv. 2025;11(13):eadt3311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Truett GE, Heeger P, Mynatt RL, Truett AA, Walker JA, and Warman ML. Preparation of PCR-quality mouse genomic DNA with hot sodium hydroxide and tris (HotSHOT). Biotechniques. 2000;29(1):52, 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Stamm CE, Pasko BL, Chaisavaneeyakorn S, Franco LH, Nair VR, Weigele BA, et al. Screening Mycobacterium tuberculosis Secreted Proteins Identifies Mpt64 as a Eukaryotic Membrane-Binding Bacterial Effector. mSphere. 2019;4(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Andreu N, Zelmer A, Fletcher T, Elkington PT, Ward TH, Ripoll J, et al. Optimisation of bioluminescent reporters for use with mycobacteria. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kavsak P, Rasmussen RK, Causing CG, Bonni S, Zhu H, Thomsen GH, et al. Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF beta receptor for degradation. Mol Cell. 2000;6(6):1365–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









