Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Aug 7;32(33):19725–19739. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36796-4

Ecotoxicological effects of innovative wood protection treatments on freshwater bioindicator organisms

Nicoletta Nesto 1,✉, Tihana Marčeta 1, Daniele Cassin 1, Francesco Acri 1, Andrea Pesce 1, Vanessa Moschino 1
PMCID: PMC12425844  PMID: 40770456

Abstract

The protection of wooden structures used in aquatic environments is of paramount importance to prevent their attack by xylophagous organisms. With the aim of testing innovative and more eco-friendly wood treatments for the freshwater environments, we evaluated the possible ecotoxicological effects of Picea abies wood panels differently treated with copper-based formulation and thermal modification. The toxicity of the treatments was evaluated through exposure experiments by applying the biomarker approach in two freshwater bioindicators: the bivalve Dreissena polymorpha and the gastropod Theodoxus fluviatilis. The organisms were kept for 4 weeks in experimental tanks under semi-static conditions of the following: control (no panels), NTC (untreated panels), TT (thermally treated panels), and S-UC3 (panels treated with Cu-based formulation). Biomarkers in mussels exhibited no toxic effects attributable to NTC and TT conditions. The biological responses of the gastropods registered some stress signals not related to leaching process. Panels treated with the S-UC3 formulation caused 100% mortality of gastropods and damage effects in mussels. These responses were consistent with copper released in the water, which reached a concentration higher than 200 ppb. The study highlighted the need to improve the rinsing/maturation phase in wood panel impregnation protocols, to remove the Cu fraction easily released in freshwater environment. T. fluviatilis exhibited excessive sensitivity under microcosm conditions, indicating its unsuitability as a bioindicator in standardized aquarium exposure experiments.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name 11356_2025_36796_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: Ecotoxicology, Biomarker approach, Wood treatment, Impregnating agent, Dreissena polymorpha, Theodoxus fluviatilis

Introduction

Wood is used as building material for a wide range of applications, including bridges, walkways, pontoons, and other structures placed within or close to waterways and wetlands, due to its structural, economic, environmental and aesthetic advantages (WWPI 2012). However, as a natural material, wood is subject to degradation phenomena and, if not adequately protected against the action of various biotic (fungi, insects, termites) and abiotic (temperature and humidity) decay factors, it loses its characteristics becoming structurally unusable (Marais et al. 2022). In the past, wood degradation was overcome by using highly durable hardwoods, such as cedar or cypress or by turning to tropical timbers. Today, due to environmental issues related to deforestation and the availability of the material, soft coniferous timbers are commonly used by the European wood construction industry. Picea abies, the Norway spruce, is the most widely used, due to its high availability and good workability. However, Norway spruce is not naturally durable, and application of protection agents is needed to comply with the use for outdoor structures (Caudullo et al. 2016).

Some substances naturally present in wood such as tannins, phlobaphenes, alkaloids, phenols, and polyphenes are capable of inhibiting insects and fungi colonization, providing the wood with some natural protection. Wood extracts and leachates from softwood conifers like pine and spruce have been demonstrated to contain bioactive compounds such as resin acids, phenolics, and terpenoids that pose ecotoxicological risks to aquatic organisms. For example, resin acids are toxic for fish at relatively low concentration range, i.e. 200–800 pg L−1, causing acute effects including respiratory distress and mortality (McFarlane and Clark 1988). Moreover, phenolic compounds and terpenoids inhibit microbial activity already at minimal concentrations < 300 mg L−1 (Metsämuuronen and Sirén, 2019). Libralato et al. (2011) assessed the toxicity of lignin and tannin on the marine alga Phaeodactylum tricornutum, reporting EC₅₀ values of 113.8 mg L−1 and 26.04 mg L−1 respectively, observing a morphological change of the algae fusiform shape at tannin concentrations ≥ 75 mg L−1 and < 185 mg L−1. Moreover, bioassays showed that tannic acid concentrations ranging from 0.06 to 2.0 mM have harmful effects on freshwater crustacean species such as Chydorus sphaericus, Diaptomus castor, and Eucypris fuscata (Pautou et al. 2000). Few data on environmental concentrations are available to properly understand the ecological relevance of these substances. Natural wood extract concentrations in freshwater ecosystems have been reported to be 8 mg/L for tannins (Earl et al. 2025), 8.5 μg/L for lignin (Reuter et al. 2017), 12 mg/L for resin acids near pulp mill effluent outfalls (Quinn et al. 2003), and 179 mg/L for phenolic compounds (Kumar and Pacha 2015). These outcomes suggest that the environmental concentrations of some of these substances might have ecotoxicological effects.

Despite these natural substances provide wood with some protection against xylophagous organisms, additional treatments are required before using it as construction material. There are mainly two methods for increasing wood durability: physical modifications (i.e., acetylation, furfurylation, thermal modification) and chemical protection using impregnating agents (Hill 2006; Gérardin 2016; Khademibami and Bobadilha 2022).

To increase wood durability, there are number of physical treatments aimed at altering the cell wall structure. The thermal treatment consists of a controlled pyrolysis process (T = 230/240 °C in the absence of oxygen), which allows the wood to become more compact and stable, and less hygroscopic and permeable. As a consequence, the wood results more resistant to xylophagous organisms, as the nutrients contained in the hemicelluloses are degraded by high temperatures, leading to the formation of degradation products such as acetic acid, methanol, formic acid, furfurals, and aldehydes that could be subject to leaching phenomena (Hill et al. 2021). To our knowledge, few studies have reported the ecotoxicological effects of heat-treated wood leachates on aquatic organisms. Esteves et al. (2011) conducted ecotoxicological assays on the bacteria (Bacillus stearothermophilus) using leachates from heat-treated pine wood and did not show any effect. A series of acute and chronic tests using leachates obtained from thermally modified wood (Picea abies) demonstrated that they have similar impacts to those of untreated wood. However, chronic tests using Daphnia magna resulted in high mortality of organisms when leachates derived from untreated and thermally modified wood samples were used directly, Conversely, a maturation period of at least 15 days produced less toxic leachates that allowed good levels of survival and offspring production (Picone et al. 2024).

Alternatively, the durability of wood may be chemically enhanced by impregnation with effective biocides. Copper-based biocides, in which copper compounds are combined with additives to increase the fixation capacity of copper, are the most commonly used for the impregnation of wood (Thaler and Humar 2014). In the past, mainly copper chromate arsenate (CCA) and/or creosote were used (Humar and Lesar 2013). Due to toxicity issues, the use of chromium-based wood preservatives has been significantly restricted or even banned in some EU countries since the implementation of the Biocides Directive (98/8/EC, 1998). The wood industry has therefore focused its efforts in developing alternative Cu-based wood preservative where Cr has been replaced by amines, mainly ethanolamine, in the preservative fixation process (Freeman and McIntyre 2008; Humar and Lesar 2013).

When exposed to environmental matrices, both thermally and chemically treated wood may be subject to leaching processes. The release of wood preservatives in the environment causes both a reduction in the service life of wooden structures and negative effects on environment and human health (Barbero-López et al. 2021). Leaching occurs both for bio-based compounds, such as pyrolysis distillates (Mohan et al. 2008), tannins (Sommerauer et al. 2019), and chitosans (Alfredsen et al. 2004) and for the Cu-based preservatives where Cr has been replaced by amines (Humar et al. 2001; Cooper and Ung 2009; Thaler and Humar 2014), but also for thermal modifications producing polysaccharide degradation products (Hill et al. 2021). Therefore, an ecotoxicological assessment, evaluating the possible effects of treated wood materials before their use in aquatic environment is of paramount importance for providing a judgement of environmental acceptability of the impregnating agents or physical treatments.

Freshwater ecosystems, whose conservation is regulated by Directive 2000/60/EC, are among the most diverse and dynamic environments on Earth as they play a crucial role in the biosphere, being biodiversity hotspots and providing essential resources for human survival and well-being (WWF 2023). Potential leaching of toxic compounds from artificial wooden structures such as pontoons, poles, bridges treated with chemical preservatives or thermally modified may represent sources of pollution, and a risk for aquatic organisms. Some studies have documented measurable leaching of copper, chromium, arsenic, zinc, and organic compounds from treated wood into adjacent soil, sediment, and water in natural environments such as wetlands, lakes, rivers, and estuaries (Forest Products Laboratory 2000; Wendt et al. 1996).

Typically, riverine systems with flowing water tend to have greater mobility and dispersal of preservative compounds, potentially leading not only to rapid downstream transport but also to their dilution. On the contrary, lakes and wetlands are often characterized by slower water movement and higher sedimentation, consequently leading to the accumulation of contaminants into sediments and biota, thus increasing long-term exposure and ecological risk (Weis and Weis 1996; Lebow 1996; Brooks 2000; Hingston et al. 2001). Concentrations of leachates might vary depending on proximity to treated wood, age of the structure, environmental conditions, and water exchange rates. Environmental concentration of copper typically ranges from 10 to 400 µg g−1 in sediments adjacent to treated structures (Weis and Weis 1992, 1996; Lebow and Tippie 2001), whereas water concentrations near new CCA-treated wood can reach up to 50 µg L−1 or more, but decrease over time due to leaching decline (Lebow 1996; Hingston et al. 2001). Chromium (Cr) and arsenic (As) were often found in sediments more than in water, as they were bound to fine particles, with levels in sediment near CCA-treated wood reaching 50–200 µg g−1 (Weis and Weis 1996; Brooks 2000; Hingston et al. 2001).

For a comprehensive assessment of the possible effects of a compound or a mixture of compounds in an aquatic environment, chemical analyses carried out in the various environmental matrices must be integrated with an assessment of their biological effects on organisms (Schuijt et al. 2021). In this context, a battery of biochemical, cellular, and physiological responses, commonly known as biomarkers, have been applied for the first time to evaluate the possible negative effect of wood treatments on the health status of bioindicators organisms. This study is part of a more complex research aiming at assessing the efficacy and the environmental compatibility of wood protection techniques and their possible impacts on aquatic environments, also through the application of ecotoxicological bioassays (Guarneri et al. 2021; Natali et al. 2023; Picone et al. 2024).

The biomarker approach, developed in the laboratory and subsequently validated in the environment since the 1980 s for the evaluation of the biological effects of priority pollutants, provides an integrated assessment of the ecosystem quality through the description of the state of well-being of the sentinel organisms (Bayne et al. 1985). The use of a biomarker battery, in which several biomarkers are measured simultaneously at different levels of biological organisation, allows to diagnose possible effects of contaminants to which bioindicator organisms have been exposed to and to predict the occurrence of long-term negative effects (Blaise and Gagné 2009; Dellali et al. 2022).

Biomarkers may be applied in both field-based monitoring and controlled laboratory exposure experiments, each showing distinctive advantages and limitations (Van der Oost et al. 2003; Galloway 2006). In field monitoring, biomarkers assess organism health in situ under real environmental conditions, capturing cumulative and synergic effects of multiple stressors. They are early-warning signals of sublethal stresses, valuable for long-term environmental surveillance and pollution effect tracking. The main strengths of their field applications are the ecological relevance and the ability to detect impacts over time and space, though interpretation is complicated by natural variability, unknown exposure histories, and confounding factors (Peakall 1994). In laboratory experiments, biomarkers are used under controlled conditions to establish cause-effect correlation concentration–response evaluation and the identification of ecotoxicological thresholds. Laboratory studies offer reproducibility and variable isolation, facilitating mechanistic understanding (Van der Oost et al. 2003; Galloway 2006).

In this study, the environmental sustainability of innovative wood treatments (a Cu-based biocide and a thermal treatment) was evaluated for freshwater habitats with the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha and the nerite gastropod Theodoxus fluviatilis. The potential toxic effects of the two wood treatments were assessed in organisms exposed in static controlled laboratory condition, through the determination of a suite of biochemical and physiological biomarkers. The biological data were also evaluated in the light of the concentration of Cu and other metals found in the experimental tanks to verify the presence of possible leaching phenomena.

D. polymorpha is a typical sentinel species for freshwater environment both in Europe and in North America and commonly used in biomonitoring studies involving the application of the biomarker approach. This species shows many characteristics that make it suitable as biomonitor: it is sedentary, distributed in a variety of habitats, easy to sample, long-lived, and have a high filtration rate favouring the uptake and the bioconcentration of substances (Reeders et al. 1989; de Lafontaine et al. 2000; Faria et al. 2009; Palais et al. 2012; Binelli et al. 2015; Devin et al. 2023).

T. fluviatilis is a species highly abundant and widely distributed on stones in swift running rivers throughout Europe (Bunje and Lindberg 2007) and in the Baltic Sea (HELCOM 2012). It is considered very sensitive to disturbance according to AMBI (AZTI Marine Biotic Index) ecological group (Borja et al. 2000). This species has been already used only once as model organism in a biomonitoring study aimed at evaluating the effects of harbour contaminants in Sweden (Bighiu et al. 2017).

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the biological effects of the two wood treatments assessed in D. polymorpha and T. fluviatilis through the biomarker approach to provide a first insight of the potential toxicity before their use into freshwater environments. Lastly, as to our knowledge, this is the first study where T. fluviatilis has been used in exposure experiments under lab conditions, we also tested the suitability of this species as a possible sentinel organism for freshwater environments.

Materials and methods

Collection and treatment of the test organisms and exposure experiment design

Approximately 3000 adult specimens of the bivalve D. polymorpha and the gastropod T. fluviatilis were collected in two natural areas of the Veneto Region (Italy) in October 2021: a site located in the Northern Garda Lake (45°52′54.49″N, 10°50′18.56″E) and a site located in the Limbraga river, a tributary of the Sile River (45°39′44.54″N, 12°16′17.97″E), respectively. For both areas, the ecological and chemical status of the water bodies were considered good in 2020 under the monitoring of the Water Framework Directive (Provincia Autonoma di Trento 2020; ARPAV 2021). Organisms were maintained 2 weeks before the experiments in 30-L aquaria filled with aerated dechlorinated tap water at temperature 20 ± 0.5 °C with a 14 h:10 h light/dark cycle for acclimatization. During the acclimatization period, organisms were fed with Perla Larva Proactiv (®Hendrix) and aquatic macrophytes every second day, and half water was renewed every 2 days, particularly the day after feeding. Check for mortality were daily carried out and moribund or dead individuals were promptly removed.

The wooden panels to be tested were prepared and supplied by Silvaprodukt d.o.o. (Ljubljana, Slovejia) according to “Use Class 3” (UC3) contained in the EN 335 standard (CEN European Committee for Standardization 2013). Wooden panels were impregnated with a formulation of Silvanolin® having a copper concentration of 0.25% according to a vacuum-pressure procedure (30 min vacuum at 10 kPa; 3 h pressure at 900 kPa; 15 min vacuum at 20 kPa) and subjected to a conditioning procedure over a month at a temperature of 20 °C and 70% relative humidity (Humar et al. 2008).

For the thermal modification, the wooden panels were isothermally treated for 3 h at 190, 200, 210, 220, and 230 °C, respectively, according to the Silvapro® commercial procedure (Rep and Pohleven 2001).

After the acclimatisation period, approximately 200 mussels and 250 gastropods were placed randomly in each experimental tank and maintained for 4 weeks under four experimental conditions: control (C, no wood panels), untreated P. abies wood panels (NTC), thermally treated P. abies wood panels (TT), and P. abies wood panels treated with impregnating solution containing 0.25% Cu (S-UC3). Three tanks (i.e., replicates) containing 46 L of freshwater were set up for each experimental condition. In each tank, excluding controls, one wood panel (40.0 × 7.5 × 2.5 cm) was placed at the bottom of the tank by two pebbles previously washed with distilled water (Fig. 1). Wood panel surface/volume ratio was 0.018 cm2 cm−3. Given the absence of specific protocols, this surface/volume ratio, used also for the experiments performed in seawater, was chosen based on the results obtained in acute toxicity tests aimed at assessing the survival capacity of the crustacean Acartia (Acanthacartia) tonsa when exposed to the same impregnating solution containing 0.25% Cu (Volpi Ghirardini et al. 2022).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Scheme of the experimental tank setup. Mussels and gastropods were exposed for 4 weeks to the different experimental conditions: C (no wood panel), NTC (not treated wood panel); TT (thermically treated wood panel); S-UC3 (wood panel treated with 0.25% Cu impregnating solution). Three tanks were set up for each experimental condition (replicates)

Tanks were provided with oxygen and D. polymorpha and T. fluviatilis specimens were fed every 2 days with Perla Larva Proactiv (®Hendrix) and aquatic macrophytes collected along the margins of the Sile River, respectively. A quart of water was renewed every 2 days, particularly the day after feeding to avoid nitrate increase. Water samples were collected during the water changes for chemical analysis. During the experiment, the organisms were kept at a temperature of 20 ± 0.5 °C, with a 14 h:10 h light/dark cycle.

Chemical analyses

The samples for the analyses of dissolved nutrients, N-NH3 (ammonia), N-NO2 (nitrite), N-NO3 (nitrate), and P-PO4 (phosphate) were filtered on Whatman GF/F glass fiber filters (porosity = 0.7 µm) and analyzed with an EasyChem Plus analyser, manufactured by SYSTEA S.p.A. following Grasshoff et al. (1983) and Doane and Horwath (2003):

  1. N-NH3: formation of indophenol blue and reading at 630 nm (DL = 0.05 µM);

  2. N-NO2: diazotization and formation of a red nitrogenous compound read at 546 nm (DL = 0.01 µM);

  3. N-NO3: diazotization and formation of a red nitrogenous compound read at 546 nm after quantitative reduction of nitrate to nitrite by vanadium (III). Finally, a correction has to be made for nitrite present in the sample (DL = 0.10 µM);

  4. P-PO4: formation of a blue phosphomolybdic complex and subsequent reading at 880 nm (DL = 0.02 µM).

In the results the sum of ammonia, nitrite and nitrate is indicated as DIN, dissolved inorganic nitrogen.

The concentration of Cu and other metals (Hg, Al, Ba, Cd, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn) was determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry in integrated water samples collected from each experimental condition after 2, 10, 17, and 27 days from the beginning of the experiment to assess the possible release of inorganic compounds from the treated wood panels into the water.

In the laboratory, the water samples were acidified by addition of nitric acid to a pH < 2, appropriately diluted and then directly analyzed by inductively coupled plasma (ICP-AES) (USEPA 1994). Calibration for ICP- AES analysis was achieved with prepared external standards via the standard curve approach. Full calibration was performed after every set of 48 samples. The method detection limit for element analysis was defined as three times the standard deviation of ten blank measurements.

Determination of biomarkers

The possible toxic effects of different wood panel treatments were assessed in the two bioindicator species through the determination of a suite of biomarkers applied at different level of biological organisation. At the biochemical level, biological responses were assessed in terms of the activity of some antioxidant/detoxifying enzymes such as catalase (CAT) and glutathione-transferase (GST) involved in the elimination of free radicals, according to methods described in Wojtal-Frankiewicz et al. (2014) and Habig and Jakoby (1981), respectively. The activity of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE), involved in the transmission of electric impulses at synaptic level, was determined according to Binelli et al. (2005). The amount of metallothionein (MT), cytosolic proteins involved in metal detoxification processes, was assessed according to the spectrophotometric methods described in Kimura et al. (1979) and Viarengo et al. (1997).

Due to the small size of the mollusc species used, biochemical biomarkers were determined on the whole soft tissue. All biochemical determinations were referred to the total protein content measured according to Bradford (1976). Each determination was performed on two to three pools per experimental tank, each pool consisting of at least five to ten organisms depending on the species.

To evaluate the general physiological state of the zebra mussels, the condition index, providing information on the organisms’ body mass, was determined. The condition index [IC = (soft tissue dry weight/shell dry weight) × 100] was assessed on four individuals from each tank (12 organisms per experimental condition) according to Crosby and Gale (1990). Furthermore, during the 4-week experiment, mortality was daily monitored for both species, and dead organisms were promptly removed from the tanks.

Statistical analysis

Significant differences among experimental conditions were assessed for each parameter by means of a linear mixed model with the tank as a random effect and followed by Tukey’s post-hoc correction using the R programme (R Core Team 2020). For all statistical analyses, the significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Chemical analyses

The concentrations of metals determined in the water samples collected 2, 10, 17, and 27 days after the beginning of the experiment are shown in Table 1. In general, the concentrations of Hg, Cd, Fe, and Ni were below the instrumental detection limit in all the experimental tanks. The concentrations of Al, Ba, Cr, Mn, Pb, and Zn were low and constant over time. Cu concentrations were low in all experimental conditions except for the tanks containing the panels treated with the 0.25% Cu impregnating solution (S-UC3). Specifically, during the experiment the values ranged between 3 and 7 ppb in the control tanks (C), 3 and 8 ppb in the untreated panel tanks (NTC), and 4 and 5 ppb in the thermally treated panel tanks (TT). In S-UC3, Cu concentration showed a value of 156 ppb after 2 days from the beginning of the experiment and reached its highest value of 203 ppb after 10 days, before gradually decreasing to 129 ppb after 27 days.

Table 1.

Metal concentrations (ppb) in water periodically sampled at the different experimental conditions: C (no wood panel), NTC (not treated wood panel); TT (thermically treated wood panel); S-UC3 (wood panel treated with 0.25%Cu impregnating solution)

Hg Al Ba Cd Cr Cu Fe Mn Ni Pb Zn
Experimental condition Day ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb
C 2  < d.l 78 37  < d.l 1 3 6 0  < d.l 3 8
10  < d.l 28 41  < d.l 1 7  < d.l 1  < d.l 4 7
17  < d.l 30 43  < d.l 1 6  < d.l 1  < d.l 2 8
27  < d.l 135 47  < d.l 1 6 17 1  < d.l 4 15
NTC 2  < d.l 17 26  < d.l 1 3  < d.l 2  < d.l 3 6
10  < d.l 23 38  < d.l 1 8  < d.l 1  < d.l 4 6
17  < d.l 23 39  < d.l 1 7  < d.l 1  < d.l 2 7
27  < d.l 32 47  < d.l 1 4 4 2 1 3 12
TT 2  < d.l 30 34  < d.l 1 5  < d.l 2  < d.l 4 5
10  < d.l 27 33  < d.l 1 4 1 2  < d.l 4 6
17  < d.l 28 41  < d.l 1 5 2 1  < d.l 3 14
27  < d.l 34 44  < d.l 1 5 2 1  < d.l 2 8
S-UC3 2  < d.l 24 36  < d.l 1 156  < d.l 12  < d.l 3 8
10  < d.l 45 44  < d.l 1 203 5 9 1 4 15
17  < d.l 37 43  < d.l 1 173 1 7  < d.l 3 14
27  < d.l 33 44  < d.l 2 129 3 4  < d.l 3 10
d.l 0.1 10 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 5
L.D. 31/01 1 200 - 5 50 1000 200 50 20 10–25 -

d.l. detection limits

L.D. 31/01 = limits imposed by Legislative Decree 31/01—Implementation of Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption

The nutrient levels determined in water samples at the end of the experiment are shown in Table 2. Ammonium, nitrite, nitrate, and phosphate concentrations resulted similar in the different experimental conditions, showing values ranging from 1.7 to 4.1 µM for N-NH3, from 23.9 to 60.7 µM for N-NO2, from 592.7 to 651.4 µM for N-NO3, and from 6.8 to 8.8 µM for P-PO4.

Table 2.

Nutrient concentrations (µM) in water samples taken at the end of the experiment at the different experimental conditions: C (no wood panel), NTC (not treated wood panel); TT (thermically treated wood panel); S-UC3 (wood panel treated with 0.25%Cu impregnating solution)

N-NH3 N-NO2 N-NO3 DIN* P-PO4
mean sd mean sd mean sd mean sd mean sd
C 4.1 3.4 29.5 8.8 651.4 62.1 684.9 62.0 8.8 1.36
NTC 2.0 0.9 23.9 15.9 622.2 22.4 648.0 37.9 7.2 1.59
TT 3.2 1.2 60.7 6.1 592.7 33.4 656.5 28.3 8.1 0.704
S-UC3 1.7 0.9 40.4 44.5 622.5 49.2 664.5 29.5 6.8 0.99

sd standard deviation

*Dissolved inorganic nitrogen

Biological analyses

The mortality registered for D. polymorpha and T. fluviatilis exposed to different experimental conditions is shown in Fig. 2. Mussels exposed to the panels treated with the S-UC3 formulation reached mortality levels of 83.17 ± 17.96% at the end of the experiment. These values resulted significantly higher than those reached by organisms exposed to the other three experimental conditions (C, NTC, and TT). Mortality recorded in mussels exposed to control condition (C), untreated panels (NTC), and thermally treated panels (TT) showed values of 11.83 ± 3.33%, 18 ± 1%, and 9.50 ± 2.29%, respectively. Gastropods showed higher mortality levels than mussels. All gastropods exposed to S-UC3 panels died after 2-day exposure and for this reason it was not possible to proceed with the analysis of other biological parameters for this sample. The values of mortality resulted significantly different among all experimental conditions, reaching values of 32.04 ± 6.32% for sample exposed to TT wood panel, 56.90 ± 6.91% for C samples, and 42.20 ± 4.25% for sample exposed to NTC conditions.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Mortality (mean ± sd, n = 3) of D. polymorpha and T. fluviatilis exposed for 4 weeks at: C (no wood panel), NTC (not treated wood panel), TT (thermically treated wood panel), S-UC3 (wood panel treated with 0.25% Cu impregnating solution). Statistical differences (p < 0.05) among experimental conditions (according to the Tukey post-hoc correction results) are presented with lower case letters (a, b) for D. polymorpha and with capital letters (A-D) for T. fluviatilis

The condition index showed significantly lower values in mussels exposed to S-UC3 panels (1.60 ± 0.50) compared to the samples from the remaining experimental conditions (C 2.42 ± 0.50, NTC 2.20 ± 0.58, TT 2.42 ± 0.50) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Condition index (mean ± sd, n = 3) measured in D. polymorpha exposed for 4 weeks at: C (no wood panel), NTC (not treated wood panel), TT (thermically treated wood panel), S-UC3 (wood panel treated with 0.25% Cu impregnating solution). Statistical differences (p < 0.05) among experimental conditions (according to the Tukey post hoc correction results) are presented with lower case letters (a, b)

The results from the biomarker analysis carried out in D. polymorpha samples are reported in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Acetyl cholinesterase activity (AChE), catalase activity (CAT), glutathione S tranferase activity (GST), and metallotioneins content (mean ± sd, n = 3) measured in D. polymorpha exposed for four weeks at: C (no wood panel), NTC (not treated wood panel), TT (thermically treated wood panel), S-UC3 (wood panel treated with 0.25% Cu impregnating solution). Statistical differences (p < 0.05) among experimental conditions (according to the Tukey post hoc correction results) are presented with lower case letters (a, b)

AChE activity resulted significantly lower in control samples (29.32 ± 0.5 nmol min−1 mg−1 protein) than in TT samples (37.91 ± 4.19 nmol min−1 mg−1 protein). The activity measured in S-UC3 and NTC samples showed similar and intermediate values equal to 31.40 ± 2.13 and 34.11 ± 7.17 nmol min−1 mg−1 protein, respectively.

As regards the activities of the antioxidant enzymes, CAT values were lower in C sample (109.43 ± 8.86 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein) with respect to the others, although the differences were not statistically significant. Highest CAT activity (129.04 ± 7.82 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein) was found in S-UC3 sample. GST activity resulted significantly depressed in S-UC3 sample (88.03 ± 40.99 nmol CDNB min−1 mg−1 protein) with respect to the other samples, which showed similar values, ranging from 205.09 ± 13.4 in TT to 262.63 ± 29.63 nmol CDNB min−1 mg−1 protein found in C.

The MT content resulted significantly higher in S-UC3 samples (6.89 ± 1.05 nmol mg−1 protein) compared to C (4.81 ± 0.71 nmol mg−1 protein) and TT (4.61 ± 1.25 nmol mg−1 protein) samples.

The results from the biomarker analysis carried out in T. fluviatilis samples are reported in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Acetyl cholinesterase activity (AChE), catalase activity (CAT), glutathione S tranferase activity (GST), and metallotioneins content (mean ± sd, n = 3) measured in T. fluviatilis exposed for four weeks to the different experimental conditions: C (no wood panel), NTC (not treated wood panel), TT (thermically treated wood panel), S-UC3 (wood panel treated with 0.25% Cu impregnating solution). Statistical differences (p < 0.05) among experimental conditions (according to the Tukey post hoc correction results) are presented with lower case letters (a–c)

The AChE activity was statistically different among all experimental conditions and in particular decreased in both NTC (489.12 ± 29.81 nmol min−1 mg−1 protein) and TT (406.66 ± 28.36 nmol min−1 mg−1 protein) samples compared to C (577.42 ± 105.23 nmol min−1 mg−1 protein).

CAT activity was statistically different among all experimental conditions with significantly lower values in NTC (293.57 ± 140.93 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein) and TT (377.77 ± 175.86 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein) samples, compared to C sample (442.92 ± 82.27 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein).

GST activity showed higher values in NTC (531.12 ± 69.38 nmol CDNB min−1 mg−1 protein) and TT (454.70 ± 81.51 nmol CDNB min−1 mg−1 protein) samples than in C (428.65 ± 69.86 nmol CDNB min−1 mg−1 protein) and no statistical differences were found among experimental conditions.

The MT content resulted significantly higher in TT sample (6.35 ± 0.39 nmol mg−1 protein) than both C and NTC samples, which showed statistically similar values (3.95 ± 0.21 and 4.71 ± 0.86 nmol mg−1 protein, respectively).

Discussion

In this study, the biomarker approach was used to assess the effects of both physical and chemical treatments applied to P. abies wood panels in a freshwater environment. In particular, we designed a 4-week exposure experiment in order to evaluate the ecological effects of the release of potentially toxic substances in the water using two bioindicator species: the zebra mussel D. polymorpha commonly used in environmental quality assessment (de Lafontaine et al. 2000; Faria et al. 2009) and the river nerite T. fluviatilis for the first time as bioindicator to evaluate potential ecotoxicological effects through exposure experiments.

Analyses of metals determined in the water samples showed that wood panels treated with the S-UC3 formulation caused a marked release of Cu into the water, with the highest concentration observed after 10 days (203 ppb), for then decreasing at the end of the experiment. This observation is in agreement with the results of other studies on leaching dynamics of copper-ethanolamine treated wood, indicating that leaching is greater in its initial phase (Thaler and Humar 2014).

Copper (Cu) is an essential micronutrient, as it is a component of various enzymes. However, Cu can also be toxic to aquatic organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations. Rajalakshmi and Mohandas (2005) investigated acid phosphatase activity pattern in the gills and hepatopancreas of the freshwater mussel Lamellidens corrianus exposed to copper concentrations varying from 100 to 400 µg L−1. Their findings indicated a higher enzyme activity in gills as a short-term response to metal toxicity, and inhibition of enzyme synthesis in the hepatopancreas. The filtration rate and survival of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) were investigated during chronic exposure to Cu concentrations up to 100 µg L−1, resulting in a EC50 of 43 µg L−1 (Kraak et al. 1992). It is worth noting that the Cu concentrations observed in this study over time in the S-UC3 experimental tanks were highly above the levels causing adverse effects to aquatic life (Mebane 2023). As for the Environmental Quality Standard under the WFD, 21 EU countries have set threashold values for Cu in freshwaters, varying between 0.5 and 120 µg Cu L−1 (European Environment Agency 2022). Additionally, Wilson et al. (2023) confirmed the concentration of 1 µg Cu L−1 as Environmental Quality Standard based on bioavailability.

The copper leached from S-UC3 formulation resulted in 100% mortality of the T. fluviatilis and in more than 80% mortality of D. polymorpha, coupled with the presence of some stress signals in the surviving mussels. The mortality recorded in S-UC3 conditions could also be caused by other synergic unforeseen factors that also lead to the mortality of control organisms. This result confirms the findings of Picone and co-authors (2024) who reported that copper and Cu-complexes were identified as the main contaminants of concern in leachates obtained from Norway spruce specimens treated with the same Cu-based preservative solution. Moreover, in the same study, the toxicity of the leachates was demonstrated through the application of a tiered Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) (Picone et al. 2024). The Cu leaching in freshwater medium may be due to the use of ethanolamine as fixative agent in the preservative formulation (Humar et al. 2001). Although few studies focused on copper leaching mechanisms from copper-ethanolamine treated wood, the results available so far indicated that ethanolamine is not particularly effective to fixate Cu (Cooper and Ung 2009; Thaler and Humar 2014). The toxicity of S-UC3 treatment was demonstrated in ecotoxicological tests, addressing acute effects on Aliivibrio fischeri, Raphidocelis subcapitata, and Daphnia magna (Picone et al. 2024), and causing modifications on microbial biofilm formation in wood panels exposed in the Grado Lagoon (Natali et al. 2023).

In the present study, the mortality values registered in mussel samples exposed to both TT and NTC wood panels were low and similar to C sample, suggesting that NTC panels and TT wood treatment were generally well tolerated by D. polymorpha. Conversely, gastropod samples showed significantly higher mortality values than mussels in all experimental conditions, providing evidence of a stress syndrome experienced by T. fluviatilis, thus resulting more sensitive than D. polymorpha. The higher tolerance to copper concentrations of zebra mussels was also observed by Claudi et al. (2023) in comparison to quagga mussels (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis). The authors found that zebra mussels accumulated more than twice copper than quaggas, suggesting that numerous physiological aspects might play a role to explain this finding, although the toxicity mechanisms still need to be clarified. Contrary to zebra mussels, in gastropods, the mortality data suggest the presence of a weak physiological condition also in the reference organisms (C and NTC). The high mortality rates recorded also in the control organisms might indicate that laboratory conditions prolonged for long periods are not suitable for this species, making specimens even more sensitive to treatments. Moreover, the higher survival rates recorded in TT and NTC samples compared to C organisms could be attributed to the presence of wood not impregnated with chemicals in tanks, which increased the available surface for biofilm growth, and T. fluviatilis typically grazes on hard benthic surfaces, including submerged wood (Orton and Sibley 1990; Abdallah 2015).

T. fluviatilis is considered very sensitive to disturbance also according to AMBI ecological group (Borja et al. 2000) and the results of the overall physiological state observed in this study may be considered, although preliminary, as indicative of its unsuitability as biomonitor, at least when used in laboratory conditions. To verify if the trophic state of the water medium would have influenced the biological responses of the biomonitor organisms, the nutrient concentrations were analysed in the experimental tanks. The levels of N-NH3, N-NO2, N-NO3, DIN, and P-PO4 determined in water at the end of the exposure experiment was overall similar among all experimental conditions, ruling out the possibility that the organisms had been fed differently depending on the tanks or that altered concentrations of ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, and phosphate could have impacted the fitness of the organisms.

The condition index (CI), giving an indication of the amount of body mass relative to the shell, is a parameter routinely used to assess the general health status of the organism (Crosby and Gale 1990). CI showed for zebra mussels significantly lower values in organisms exposed to the S-UC3 treatment than in all other samples, revealing their low physiological conditions, likely related to the Cu release in the water from S-UC3 wood panels.

Considering the biomarker analyses, no significative inhibition of the AChE activity was evidenced in D. polymorpha exposed to S-UC3 and TT wood panels when compared to NTC and reference samples, whereas in T. fluviatilis both NTC and TT samples showed significantly lower AChE activities than C sample. AChE enzyme is implicated in the proper transmission of electrical signals at the level of synaptic membranes, and it is usually considered an indicative parameter of exposure to organic contaminants (such as organophosphoric and carbamate) (UNEP/MAP-MEDPOL 2021). The AChE levels observed in D. polymorpha samples resulted comparable with those determined in organisms collected in pristine areas along the Lake Balaton in Hungary (Farkas et al. 2017) and Lawrence River in Canada (de Lafontaine et al. 2000). These findings coupled with the absence of statistical difference in the enzyme activity determined in mussel samples suggest the absence of a neurotoxic effect related to both two treatments (chemical and physical) in D. polymorpha. In T. fluviatilis, the levels of AChE activity resulted generally higher than D. polymorpha and significantly depressed in sample exposed to both NTC and TT wood panels in comparison with control sample. The presence of neurotoxic effects in T. fluviatilis was possibly due to the release into the water of both natural substances from NTC, such as phenols and aldehydes (Libralato et al. 2007), or thermal degradation products from TT wood panels, such as formic acid and acetic acid (Hill et al. 2021).

In D. polymorpha, the antioxidant activity of CAT was similar between controls and treated samples, whereas GST activity was significantly reduced in the sample exposed to S-UC3. These two enzymes are involved in detoxifying cells processes from reactive oxygen species (oxyradicals) and, generally, their activities tend to increase upon exposure to contaminants. However, CAT and GST enzymes are characterized by a bell-shaped dose response curve, and their activities are therefore inhibited above a certain threshold of toxic substances exposure (Viarengo et al. 2007). For this reason, the interpretation of the results for these biomarkers may be complex. Although the GST levels suggest the possible presence of stress signals, especially in S-UC3 sample, where a marked inhibition of the enzymatic activity occurs, the CAT levels recorded in all samples could be considered high if compare to the activity determined in D. polymorpha sampled in two reference areas: Rybinsk Reservoir (Russia) (76.90 ± 3.63 nmol min−1 mg−1 protein) (Klimova et al. 2019), and Rouge River, Michigan (USA) (4–8 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein) (Nowicki and Kashian 2018). However, the enzymatic activity is lower than that one observed in the control organisms by Parolini et al. (2010), with mean values around 200 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein, and similar to the values in the study of Riva et al. (2010), with control organisms showing CAT activity of about 70 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein. In T. fluviatilis, the activities of the antioxidant enzymes were generally higher than D. polymorpha. No significative differences were recorded among C, NTC, and TT samples for GST, whereas a statistically lower value was registered in NTC sample for CAT when compared to control sample, suggesting the possible presence of oxidative stress.

Metallothioneins are cytoplasmic proteins characterised by a high cysteine content that makes them excellent chelating agents. They are involved in the intracellular regulation of essential metals (Cu, Zn) and are induced by the presence of metals. Moreover, they play an important role in the neutralisation of toxic metals (Hg, Cd) and in the protection of metal-induced oxidative stress (Viarengo et al. 1997; Vergani et al. 2005). In mussels, MT concentrations were similar in controls and in samples exposed to the NTC and TT panels, whereas they were significantly higher in sample exposed to S-UC3, suggesting the presence of induction phenomena aimed at sequestering Cu excess at the cellular level. The MT levels registered in S-UC3 samples were higher than those determined in the same species sampled in harbor and industrial zones along the St Lawrence River (Canada) contaminated by metals and POPs, evidencing that MT levels exceeding 6 nmol mg−1 protein may be considered indicative of the presence of metal toxicity for this species (de Lafontaine et al. 2000). In T. fluviatilis, the concentration of MTs resulted similar to those registered in D. polymorpha. The significantly induction of MTs in TT and NTC samples may due, also for this biomarkers, to the presence in the medium of toxic compounds such as formic and acetic acids released by TT panels (Hill et al. 2021) or phenols, lignin, and tannins released by NTC panels (Libralato et al. 2007, 2011; Pessala et al. 2010; Alvarez et al. 2016; Picone et al. 2024), which may have determined the induction of these proteins, known to play an antioxidant role in inflammatory processes as well (Coyle et al. 2002).

Conclusions

The application of biomarker approach has proven to be a useful tool for assessing the environmental compatibility of chemical and physical treatments aimed at increasing the durability of wood.

The ecotoxicological investigations carried out using two model organisms (D. polymorpha and T. fluviatilis) to evaluate the toxicity of a Cu-based impregnating solution and a thermal modification applied in Picea abies wood panels exposed to freshwater, showed that:

  • S-UC3 wood treatment, containing 0.25% Cu, resulted toxic for both species. The chemical treatment led to copper leaching, which caused 100% mortality of the nerite gastropods, more than 80% of the zebra mussels and resulted in physiological and biochemical stress signals in the survived organisms. Based on these results, modifications in the impregnation protocol of wood panels are therefore necessary before its application in natural freshwater environments.

  • Thermally treated panels (TT) did not cause ecotoxicological effects in zebra mussels. In nerite gastropods, some oxidative and neurotoxic stress signals as well as an induction of metallothioneins were observed.

  • NTC panels were not toxic to zebra mussels, whereas stress signals were revealed in nerite gastropods probably due to the leaching of natural toxic wood compound.

  • The high mortality of T. fluviatilis in the control sample highlighted the low tolerance to aquarium conditions of this species; therefore, its use as a bioindicator organism in exposure experiments is not recommended.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr Davide Tagliapietra, the scientific coordinator of the DuraSoft project, prematurely passed away, for his commitment in the conceptualisation and realisation of the project activities and for his great knowledge of wood protection issues which always shared with the team. This paper is dedicated to him.

Author contribution

Nicoletta Nesto: writing—original draft; writing—review and editing; resources; methodology; conceptualization; investigation; project administration; funding acquisition; supervision. Tihana Marčeta: writing—review and editing; methodology; conceptualization; investigation; formal analysis; data curation. Daniele Cassin: writing—review and editing; investigation; formal analysis; data curation. Andrea Pesce: investigation, formal analysis, data curation. Francesco Acri: writing—review and editing; investigation; formal analysis; data curation. Vanessa Moschino: writing—review and editing; resources; methodology; conceptualization; investigation; project administration; funding acquisition. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR) within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This research was supported by Project DuraSoft (Innovative technologies to improve the durability of traditional wooden structures in socio-ecologically sensitive environments) funded by the interregional cooperation program INTERREG V-A Italy–Slovenia 2014–2020 and the European Union. Bando mirato per progetti standard no. 07/2019-Progetto DuraSoft (Tecnologie innovative per migliorare la durabilità delle strutture tradizionali in legno in ambienti socio ecologicamente sensibili).

Interreg

Data availability

Data will be made available on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this study, as it involved the freshwater mollusks Dreissena polymorpha and Theodoxus fluviatilis, which are not subject to animal welfare legislation under Directive 2010/63/EU and its Italian implementation (Legislative Decree No. 26/2014), as they are invertebrates other than cephalopods.

Consent to participate

This is not applicable.

Consent for publication

This is not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Highlights

• Ecotoxicological effects of wood treatments were assessed in freshwater species.

• Toxicity was evaluated in exposure experiments by applying the biomarker approach.

• Wood panels treated with Cu-based solution caused a marked release of Cu in water.

• Cu-based impregnating solution resulted toxic for both mussels and gastropods.

• Thermal modification determined some stress signals only in gastropods.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Abdallah M (2015) "Theodoxus fluviatilis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Theodoxus_fluviatilis/. Accessed 25 Jun 2025
  2. Agenzia Regionale per la Prevenzione e Protezione Ambientale del Veneto (ARPAV) (2021) Stato delle acque superficiali del Veneto, corsi d’acqua e laghi 2020. Rapporto tecnico, p 305
  3. Alfredsen G, Eikenes M, Militz H, Solheim H (2004) Screening of chitosan against wood-deteriorating fungi. Scand J for Res 19:4–13. 10.1080/02827580410017807 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez MF, Benítez HH, Villegas Cortés JC, Gabellone NA, Claps MC (2016) Effect of tannins on survival and development of Daphnia menucoensis and the abundances of bacteria. Chem Ecol 32:742–755. 10.1080/02757540.2016.1178726 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbero-López A, Akkanen J, Lappalainen R, Peräniemi S, Haapala A (2021) Bio-based wood preservatives: their efficiency, leaching and ecotoxicity compared to a commercial wood preservative. Sci Total Environ 753:142013. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayne BL, Brown DA, Burns K, Dixon DR, Ivanovici A, Livingstone DR, Lowe DM, Moore MN, Stebbing ARD, Widdows J (1985) The effects of stress and pollution on marine animals. Prager Scientific, New York [Google Scholar]
  7. Bighiu MA, Watermann B, Guo X, Almroth BC, Eriksson-Wiklund A-K (2017) Mortality and histopathological effects in harbour-transplanted snails with different exposure histories. Aquat Toxicol 190:11–20. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.06.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Binelli A, Ricciardi F, Riva C, Provini A (2005) Screening of POP pollution by AChE and EROD activities in zebra mussels from the Italian Great Lakes. Chemosphere 61:1074–1082. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Binelli A, Della Torre C, Magni S, Parolini M (2015) Does zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) represent the freshwater counterpart of Mytilus in ecotoxicological studies? A critical review. Environ Pollut 196:386–403. 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blaise C, Gagné F (2009) Bioassays and biomarkers, two pillars of ecotoxicology: past, present and prospective uses. Fresenius Environ Bull 18:135–139 [Google Scholar]
  11. Borja A, Franco J, Pérez V (2000) A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Mar Pollut Bull 40(12):1100–1114. 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00061-8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brooks KM (2000) Assessment of the environmental effects associated with wooden bridges preserved with creosote, pentachlorophenol, or chromated copper arsenate. Res. Pap. FPL–RP–587. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. p 100
  14. Bunje PME, Lindberg DR (2007) Lineage divergence of a freshwater snail clade associated with post-Tethys marine basin development. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:373–387. 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Caudullo G, Tinner W, de Rigo D (2016) Picea abies in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (eds) European Atlas For Tree Species. Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg, pp 114–116
  16. CEN European Committee for Standardization (2013) EN 335. Durability of wood and wood-based products. Use classes: definitions, application to solid wood and wood-based products. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium
  17. Claudi R, Hammond D, Mastitsky S (2023) Dose-mortality relationship for quagga and zebra mussels exposed to EarthTec QZ ionic copper: preliminary findings. Management of Biological Invasions 14(4):695–708. 10.3391/mbi.2023.14.4.08 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cooper PA, Ung YT (2009) Effect of preservative type and natural weathering on preservative gradients in Southern pine lumber. Wood Fiber Sci 41(3):229–235 [Google Scholar]
  19. Coyle P, Philcox JC, Carey LC, Rofe AM (2002) Metallothionein: the multipurpose protein. Cell Mol Life Sci 59:627–647. 10.1007/s00018-002-8454-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Crosby MP, Gale LD (1990) A review and evaluation of bivalve condition index methodologies with a suggested standard method. J Shellfish Res 9:233–237 [Google Scholar]
  21. de Lafontaine Y, Gagné F, Blaise C, Costan G, Gagnon P, Chan HM (2000) Biomarkers in zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) for the assessment and monitoring of water quality of the St Lawrence River (Canada). Aquat Toxicol 50:51–71. 10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00094-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dellali M, Mardassi K, Harrath AH, Mansour L, Pacioglu O, Aldahmash W, Nahdi S, Badraoui R, Alrefaei AF, Boufahja F (2022) Physiological responses of the bivalves Mytilus galloprovincialis and Ruditapes decussatus following exposure to phenanthrene: toxicokinetics, dynamics and biomarkers study. Animals 13(1):151. 10.3390/ani13010151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Devin S, Potet M, Louis F, Pauly D, Rocher B, Wagner P, Giambérini L, Pain-Devin S (2023) Spatial and seasonal use of biomarkers in dreissenids: implications for biomonitoring. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 10.1007/s11356-023-28126-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Doane TA, Horwath WR (2003) Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate with a single reagent. Anal Lett 36(12):2713–2722. Marcel Dekker Publishing
  25. Earl JE, Aubert JF, Michael EO, Edwards DJ (2025) Effects of soil, light, and temperature on freshwater tannin concentrations. Hydrobiology 4(1):2. 10.3390/hydrobiology4010002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Esteves B, Videira R, Pereira H (2011) Chemistry and ecotoxicity of heat-treated pine wood extractives. Wood Sci Technol 45:661–676. 10.1007/s00226-010-0356-0 [Google Scholar]
  27. European Environment Agency (2022) Surface water: standard types and threshold values for river basin specific pollutants. from: https://tableau.discomap.eea.europa.eu/t/Wateronline/views/WISE_SOW_SWMET_SWRBSP/SWMET_SWRBSP_Europe
  28. Faria M, Carrasco L, Diez S, Riva MC, Bayona JM, Barata C (2009) Multi-biomarker responses in the freshwater mussel Dreissena polymorpha exposed to polychlorobiphenyls and metals. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C 149:281–288. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Farkas A, Ács A, Vehovszky Á, Falfusynska H, Stoliar O, Specziár A, Győri J (2017) Interspecies comparison of selected pollution biomarkers in Dreissenid spp. inhabiting pristine and moderately polluted sites. Sci Total Environ 599–600:760–770. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Freeman MH, McIntyre CR (2008) A comprehensive review of copper-based wood preservatives with a focus on new micronized or dispersed copper systems. For Prod J 58(11):6–27 [Google Scholar]
  31. Forest Products Laboratory (2000) Environmental impact of preservative treated wood in a wetland boardwalk: Res. Pap. FPL–RP–582. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. p 126. Available at: https://preservedwood.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/wildwoodstudy.pdf
  32. Galloway TS (2006) Biomarkers in environmental and human health risk assessment. Mar Pollut Bull 53(10–12):606–613. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gérardin P (2016) New alternatives for wood preservation based on thermal and chemical modification of wood- a review. Ann For Sci 73:559–570. 10.1007/s13595-015-0531-4 [Google Scholar]
  34. Grasshoff K, Ehrhardt M, Kremling K (eds) (1983) Methods of seawater analysis, Second. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Revised and Extended Edition p 419
  35. Guarneri I, Moschino V, Nesto N, Marčeta T, Sigovini M, Borella di Torre E, Dametto L, Pasqual S, Humar M, Lesar B et al (2021) DuraSoft project: a multidisciplinary approach for softwood protection. In: Proceedings of IRG AnnualMeeting 2021
  36. Habig WH, Jakoby WB (1981) Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-transferases. Meth Enzymol 77:398–405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. HELCOM (2012) Checklist of Baltic Sea macro-species. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings 130. Helsinki Commission pp 206
  38. Hill CAS (2006) Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. Print ISBN:9780470021729 |Online ISBN:9780470021743 |10.1002/0470021748
  39. Hill C, Altgen M, Rautkari L (2021) Thermal modification of wood-a review: chemical changes and hygroscopicity. J Mater Sci 56:6581–6614. 10.1007/s10853-020-05722-z [Google Scholar]
  40. Hingston J, Collins C, Murphy R, Lester J (2001) Leaching of chromated copper arsenate wood preservatives: a review. Environ Pollut 111:53–66. 10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00030-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Humar M, Lesar B (2013) Performance of native and copper-ethanolamine-treated wood exposed to seawater at port of Koper, Slovenia. Drv Ind 64:273–279. 10.5552/drind.2013.1251 [Google Scholar]
  42. Humar M, Petrič M, Pohleven F (2001) Leaching of copper from wood treated with copper based wood preservatives. Drv Ind 52(3):111–116 [Google Scholar]
  43. Humar M, Pohleven F, Kosmerl S (2008) Solution for wood preservation. U.S. Patent US7935182B2, 3 September 2008. 36
  44. Khademibami L, Bobadilha GS (2022) Recent developments studies on wood protection research in academia: a review. Front Glob Change 5:793177. 10.3389/ffgc.2022.793177 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kimura M, Otaki N, Imano M (1979) Rabbit liver metallothionein. Tentative Amino Acid Sequence of Metallothionein-B. In: Kägi, JHR, Nordberg M (eds) Metallothionein. Experientia Supplementum, vol 34. Birkhäuser, Basel. 10.1007/978-3-0348-6493-0_7 [DOI] [PubMed]
  46. Klimova YS, Chuiko GM, Gapeeva MV, Pesnya DS, Ivanova EI (2019) The use of oxidative stress parameters of bivalve mollusks Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771) as biomarkers for ecotoxicological assessment of environment. Inland Water Biol 12:88–95. 10.1134/S1995082919060063 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kraak MHS, Lavy D, Peeters WHM, Davids C (1992) Chronic ecotoxicity of copper and cadmium to the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 23(3):363–369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar PK, Pacha MM (2015) Assessment of phenolic compounds in the surface waters of Godavari canal, Andhra Pradesh India. Curr World Environ 10(1):338–342. 10.12944/CWE.10.1.43 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lebow ST (1996) Leaching of wood preservative components and their mobility in the environment—summary of pertinent literature. Gen Tech Rep FPL–GTR–93. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory p 36
  50. Lebow ST, Tippie M (2001) Guide for minimizing the effect of preservative-treated wood on sensitive environments. Gen Tech Rep FPL GTR–122. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, p 18
  51. Libralato G, Losso C, Volpi Ghirardini A (2007) Toxicity of untreated wood leachates towards two saltwater organisms (Crassostrea gigas and Artemia franciscana). J Hazard Mater 144:590–593. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Libralato G, Avezzù F, Volpi Ghirardini A (2011) Lignin and tannin toxicity to Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bohlin). J Hazard Mater 194:435–439. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Marais BN, Brischke C, Militz H (2022) Wood durability in terrestrial and aquatic environments – a review of biotic and abiotic influence factors. Wood Mater Sci Eng 17(2):82–105. 10.1080/17480272.2020.1779810 [Google Scholar]
  54. McFarlane PN, Clark TA (1988) Metabolism of resin acids in anaerobic systems. Water Sci Technol 20(1):273–276 [Google Scholar]
  55. Mebane CA (2023) Bioavailability and toxicity models of copper to freshwater life: the state of regulatory science. Environ Toxicol Chem 42:2529–2563. 10.1002/etc.5736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Metsämuuronen S, Sirén H (2019) Bioactive phenolic compounds, metabolism and properties: a review on valuable chemical compounds in Scots pine and Norway spruce. Phytochem Rev 18:623–664. 10.1007/s11101-019-09630-2 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mohan D, Shi J, Nicholas DD, Pittman CU, Steele FH, Cooper JE (2008) Fungicidal values of bio-oils and their lignin-rich fractions obtained from wood/bark fast pyrolysis. Chemosphere 71(3):456–465. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Natali V, Malfatti F, Cibic T (2023) Ecological effect of differently treated wooden materials on microalgal biofilm formation in the Grado Lagoon (Northern Adriatic Sea). Microorganisms 11:2196. 10.3390/microorganisms11092196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nowicki CJ, Kashian DR (2018) Comparison of lipid peroxidation and catalase response in invasive dreissenid mussels exposed to single and multiple stressors. Environ Toxicol Chem 37(6):1643–1654. 10.1002/etc.4111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Orton R, Sibley R (1990) Egg size and growth rate in Theodoxus fluviatilis (L). Funct Ecol 4(1):91–94. 10.2307/2389657 [Google Scholar]
  61. Palais F, Dedourge-Geffard O, Beaudon A, Pain-Devin S, Trapp J, Geffard O, Noury P, Gourlay-Francé C, Uher E, Mouneyrac C, Biagianti-Risbourg S, Geffard A (2012) One-year monitoring of core biomarker and digestive enzyme responses in transplanted zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha). Ecotoxicology 21:888–905. 10.1007/s10646-012-0851-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Parolini M, Binelli A, Cogni D, Provini A (2010) Multi-biomarker approach for the evaluation of the cyto-genotoxicity of paracetamol on the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Chemosphere 79(5):489–498. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Pautou MP, Rey D, David JP, Meyran JC (2000) Toxicity of vegetable tannins on crustacea associated with Alpine mosquito breeding sites. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 47:323–332. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Peakall DB (1994) The role of biomarkers in environmental assessment (1). Introduction. Ecotoxicology 3:157–160. 10.1007/BF00117080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pessala P, Schultz E, Kukkola J, Nakari T, Knuutinen J, Herve S, Paasivirta J (2010) Biological effects of high molecular weight lignin derivatives. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:1641–1645. 10.1016/JECOENV.2010.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Picone M, Russo M, Marchetto D, Distefano GG, Baccichet M, Scalabrin E, Galvan T, Humar M, Lesar B, Guarneri I, Tagliapietra D, Capodaglio G, Volpi Ghirardini A (2024) An integrated testing strategy (ITS) to assess the environmental compatibility of wood protection techniques. J Hazard Mater 472:134484. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Agenzia provinciale per la protezione dell'ambiente (2020) Acqua – Rapporto sullo stato dell’ambiente, available at https://rapportoambiente.provincia.tn.it/argomenti/acqua/. Accessed 20 Jun 2025
  68. Quinn BP, Booth MM, Delfino JJ, Holm SE, Gross TS (2003) Selected resin acids in effluent and receiving waters derived from a bleached and unbleached kraft pulp and paper mill. Environ Toxicol Chem 22(1):214–218. 10.1002/etc.5620220128 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rajalakshmi S, Mohandas A (2005) Copper-induced changes in tissue enzyme activity in a freshwater mussel. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 62(1):140–143. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 15 Feb 2022
  71. Reeders HH, Bij De Vaate A, Slim FJ (1989) The filtration rate of Dreissena polymorpha (Bivalvia) in three Dutch lakes with reference to biological water quality management. Fresh Biol 22:133–141 [Google Scholar]
  72. Rep G, Pohleven F (2001) Wood modification a promising method for wood preservation. Drv Ind 52:71–76 [Google Scholar]
  73. Reuter H, Gensel J, Elvert M, Zak D (2017) Direct analysis of lignin phenols in freshwater dissolved organic matter. Anal Chem 89(24):13449–13457. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Riva C, Porte C, Binelli A, Provini A (2010) Evaluation of 4-nonylphenol in vivo exposure in Dreissena polymorpha: bioaccumulation, steroid levels and oxidative stress. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 152(2):175–181. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2010.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schuijt LM, Peng F-J, van den Berg SJP, Dingemans MML, Van den Brink PJ (2021) (Eco)toxicological tests for assessing impacts of chemical stress to aquatic ecosystems: facts, challenges, and future. Sci Total Environ 795:148776. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Sommerauer L, Thévenon MF, Petutschnigg A, Tondi G (2019) Effect of hardening parameters of wood preservatives based on tannin copolymers. Holzforschung 73(5):457–467. 10.1515/hf-2018-0130 [Google Scholar]
  77. Thaler N, Humar M (2014) Copper leaching from copper-ethanolamine treated wood: comparison of field test studies and laboratory standard procedures. Bioresour 9(2):3038–3051. 10.15376/biores.9.2.3038-3051 [Google Scholar]
  78. UNEP/MAP-MEDPOL (2021) UNEP/MED WG 509/43. Report of the Meeting of the MED POL Focal Points Teleconference, 27–28 May and 6–7 October 2021, Annex III, Appendix 22 e 24. Monitoring Guideline/Protocols for Sampling and Sample Preservation of Maine Molluscs (such as Mytilus sp.) and Fish (such as Mullus barbatus) for IMAP CI 18; Monitoring Guideline/Protocols for Biomarker Analysis of Marine Molluscs (such as Mytilus sp.) and Fish (such as Mullus barbatus) for IMAP CI 18- Analysis of micronuclei (MNi) frequency, Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and Stress on Stress (SOS)
  79. USEPA (1994) Method 200.7, Determination of metals and trace elements in water and wastes by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, 1994B
  80. Van der Oost R, Beyer J, Vermeulen NPE (2003) Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 13(2):57–149. 10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00126-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Vergani LK, Frattarola M, Borghi C, Dondero F, Viarengo A (2005) Fish and molluscan metallothioneins. A structural and functional comparison. FEBS J 272:6014–6023. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04993.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Viarengo A, Lowe D, Bolognesi C, Fabbri E, Koehler A (2007) The use of biomarkers in biomonitoring: a 2-tier approach assessing the level of pollutant-induced stress syndrome in sentinel organisms. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 146:281–300. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Viarengo A, Ponzano E, Dondero F, Fabbri R (1997) A simple spectrophotometric method for metallothionein evaluation in marine organisms: an application to Mediterranean and Antarctic molluscs. Mar Environ Res 44:69–84. 10.1016/S0141-1136(96)00103-1 [Google Scholar]
  84. Volpi Ghirardini A, Picone M, Distefano G, Russo M, Marchetto D (2022) Valutazione ecotossicologica in acqua salmastra. Interreg Ita-Slo Project DuraSoft Techical Report, pp 24. Available online at: https://2014-2020.ita-slo.eu/sites/default/files/progetti/Report%20ATT-AKT14_merged_compressed.pdf
  85. Weis J, Weis P (1992) Transfer of contaminants from CCA-treated lumber to aquatic biota. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 161(2):189–199. 10.1016/0022-0981(92)90096-S [Google Scholar]
  86. Weis J, Weis P (1996) The effects of using wood treated with chromated copper arsenate in shallow-water environments a review. Estuaries 19(2A):306–310 [Google Scholar]
  87. Wendt PH, Van Dolah RF, Bobo MY, Mathews TD, Levisen MV (1996) Wood preservative leachates from docks in an estuarine environment. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 31(1):24–37. 10.1007/BF00203904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wilson I, Peters A, Merrington G, Baken S (2023) Following the evidence and using the appropriate regulatory tools: a European-wide risk assessment of copper in freshwaters. Integr Environ Assess Manag 19(6):1570–1580. 10.1002/ieam.4768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wojtal-Frankiewicz A, Bernasińska J, Frankiewicz P, Gwoździński K, Jurczak T (2014) Response of Daphnia’s antioxidant system to spatial heterogeneity in cyanobacteria concentrations in a lowland reservoir. Plosone 9(11):e112597. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Western Wood Preservers Institute (WWPI) (2012) Treated wood in aquatic environments pp 36. https://preservedwood.org/portals/0/documents/TW_Aquatic_Guide.pdf
  91. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) (2023) Freshwater factsheet. Supporting life on our planet by ensuring healthy, resilient freshwater systems. https://files.worldwildlife.org/wwfcmsprod/files/Publication/file/7h59qthco9_WWF_Freshwater_Factsheet_Sep23.1.pdf. Accessed 25 Jun 2025

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on reasonable request.


Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES