Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: Neurology. 2025 Jul 10;105(3):e213798. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213798

Lifetime Risk of First Symptomatic ICH or Seizure in Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: A Multicenter Patient Data Analysis.

Philipp Dammann 1,2,*, Alejandro N Santos 1,2,*, Laven Mavarani 3, Stéphanie Guey 4,5, Hugues Chabriat 4,5, Dominique Hervé 4,5, Jacob Croft 6, Mellisa Renteria 6, David Jang 6, Jun Zhang 6, Da Li 7, Zhen Wu 7, Jian-Cong Weng 7, Antonio Petracca 8, Carmela Fusco 8, Leonardo D’Agruma 8, Marco Castori 8, Matthias Rath 9,10, Robin A Pilz 9, Ute Felbor 9, Gary K Steinberg 11, Jeanne Gu 11, David Bervini 12, Johannes Goldberg 12, Andreas Raabe 12, Andrés Cervio 13, Facundo Villamil 13, Julieta Rosales 14, Laurèl Rauschenbach 1,2, Christoph Reiss 1,2, Marvin Darkwah Oppong 1,2, Hannah Karadachi 1,2, Yahya Ahmadipour 1,2, Karsten Wrede 1,2, Ramazan Jabbarli 1,2, Cornelius Deuschl 15, Yan Li 15, Guilherme Santos Piedade 16, Martin Köhrmann 2, Benedikt Frank 2, Thomas Wälchli 17, Börge Schmidt 3, Manou Overstijns 18, Jürgen Beck 18, Christian Fung 18, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman 19, Kelly D Flemming 20, Giuseppe Lanzino 21, Atif Zafar 22,24, Shantel Weinsheimer 23,24, Jeffrey Nelson 23,24, Joseph M Zabramski 24, Amy Akers 24, Leslie Morrison 24, Charles E McCulloch 24, Helen Kim 23,24, Ulrich Sure 1,2
PMCID: PMC12428507  NIHMSID: NIHMS2106729  PMID: 40638881

Abstract

Background and Objective:

Familial cavernous malformations (FCM) are vascular lesions that pose a lifelong risk of symptomatic hemorrhage (SH) and seizures, yet their natural history remains unclear. This study aims to determine the cumulative lifetime risk of a first SH and/or seizure and assess whether genetic mutations influence these risks.

Methods:

This international, multicenter retrospective cohort study included data from 16 tertiary referral centers and one patient advocacy group. Eligible patients had confirmed or suspected FCM, available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, documented baseline clinical features, and longitudinal follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at last follow-up. Direct adjusted survival curves and mixed-effects Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate cumulative lifetime risk. The association between genetic mutations and SH/seizure rates was evaluated, and mixed-effects logistic regression assessed the impact of SH/seizures on mRS outcomes.

Results:

A total of 1,592 FCM patients were included, with a mean age of 37.6 years (SD 17.1) and 55.7% female. The median follow-up was 42 years (IQR: 27–55), totaling 64,146 person-years. Of these, 869 (54.6%) had confirmed FCM, 775 (48.7%) experienced at least one hemorrhage, and 447 (28.1%) had at least one seizure. Genetic testing was performed in 47.7%, identifying CCM1 (31.0%), CCM2 (4.8%), and CCM3 (1.9%) mutations. The lifetime risk of a first SH was ~80%, with an event rate that remained constant beyond age 20. The lifetime risk of a first seizure was ~45%. Patients with CCM3 mutations exhibited a more aggressive hemorrhagic course than those with CCM1 (HR 1.799, 95% CI: 1.008–3.208). SH and seizures were independently associated with worse mRS outcomes at last follow-up.

Discussion:

The event rate of symptomatic hemorrhage and seizures remained stable over time, leading to high cumulative lifetime risks. Patients with CCM3 mutations exhibited a more aggressive disease course. Limitations include the non-population-based design, selection bias from tertiary centers, retrospective data collection, and variability in data extraction across centers. However, this study represents the largest international FCM cohort to date, improving the precision of risk estimates and providing valuable insights into disease progression.

Keywords: Familial cerebral cavernous malformations, natural course, CCM, cavernous angioma

Introduction

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) represent a frequent type of neurovascular malformations1 and a substantial cause of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with an estimated prevalence of around 0.5% in the general population2,3. CCM-related ICH is prone to detrimental symptoms such as seizures and/or focal neurological deficits able to considerably impact the patients quality of life2,46. Around 15–20% (prevalence ~1:2000–3000) of CCM occur in the familial form of the disease79 following an autosomal dominant inherited germline mutation in genes located on chromosomes 7q (CCM1), 7p (CCM2), and 3q (CCM3)911. A known hallmark feature of familial CCM (FCM) is the presence of multiple CCM lesions distributed throughout the whole central nervous system, as well as the absence of a CCM-associated developmental venous anomaly (DVA)9,10,1216. In view of the well-known difficulties in obtaining a genetic confirmation of FCM disease, patients with suspected FCM can be subdivided into confirmed FCM cases (multiple CCM, absence of DVA, and at least one other member of the same family with CCM or positive genetic testing), and assumed FCM cases (multiple CCM, absence of DVA, and either no concerned relative or unknown family history, no genetic testing performed)9,15,17. To date, only few studies have tried to assess the natural course, as well as the overall cumulative risk of symptomatic ICH and/or seizure in patients with FCM13,1522. However, due to the rarity of this specific subgroup of patients, such studies mainly include small uni-center cohorts with short follow-up (FU) periods.

Consequently, substantial information on the specific FCM-associated risk for experiencing ICH or seizures is limited. Treatment decisions often rely on studies reporting on the much more common sporadic form of CCM. To this extent, and in view of the unmet need to investigate larger cohorts, we aimed to assess the lifetime risk of hemorrhage or seizure in FCM patients in an individual patient-level data analysis from 17 centers located in different regions around the world.

Methods

Participating Centers

We carried out a systematic review (PROSPERO register CRD42021274956) to identify recent (2011–2021) international cohorts of FCM with a minimum size of 30 patients. 27 cohorts were identified and contacted. 16 different tertiary referral centers and 1 patient advocacy group responded and agreed to participate in a data pooling study (Figure 1). Data transfer agreements were reached with all centers. Local ethics committees approved the participation in this study at all sites.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Flow chart of the Systematic review according to PRISMA Guidelines. FCM corresponds to Familial Cerebral cavernous malformation.

The study includes the following sixteen centers and 1 patient advocacy group: University Hospital Essen, Germany; French Institute of Health and Medical Research, France; Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, United States; Fondazione IRCCS-Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy; Beijing Tiantan Hospital, China; Greifswald University Medical Center, Germany; Stanford Medicine Health Care, United States; University Hospital Bern, Switzerland; Institute for Neurological Research Dr. Raul Carrea (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Mayo Clinic Rochester, United States; Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Scotland; Freiburg University Hospital, Germany; the Brain Vascular Malformation Consortium2123, which included the University of New Mexico, University of California-San Francisco, Barrow Neurological Institute, and the Alliance to Cure Cavernous Malformations, United States.

Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents

This study was approved by the University Hospital Essen Institutional Review Board (approval: 14–5751-BO, 19–8662-BO) and local ethics committees at all participating centers. As a retrospective study, ethics boards waived informed consent, and all patient data were de-identified. No experiments on live vertebrates were conducted. Authorization for identifiable patient disclosures has been obtained where applicable.

Data Availability

De-identified participant data, study protocol, and statistical analysis plan will be available upon request for five years after publication. Researchers with valid scientific requests can contact the corresponding author at philipp.dammann@uk-essen.de. Access will comply with institutional and ethical regulations.

Study Design and Participants

This multicenter cohort study assessed (through patient registry) all patients in the above mentioned institutions that fulfilled the following inclusion criteria and were treated up to the year 2022: diagnosis of confirmed or assumed familial CCM, available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, as well as digitalized and complete data records. Patients with an assumed or confirmed familial disease were defined as: presence of multiple CCM and/or genetically confirmed by testing and/or known affected relatives, as well as the absence of associated developmental venous anomaly (DVA)12,24. De-identified patient-level datasets included the following characteristics: age at diagnosis, date of diagnosis, sex, genetic confirmation of CCM-related mutations, presence of the disease in other members of the same family, CCM-related ICH, date of first hemorrhage, CCM-related seizure, date of first seizure, neurological functional outcome through the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at last follow-up, date of last follow-up, surgical or radio-surgical treatment of a lesion, presence of multiple treatments.

Mode of presentation was determined according to the following reporting standards: asymptomatic, non-hemorrhagic focal neurological deficit, non-hemorrhagic seizure, symptomatic bleeding5. FU data were acquired through routine appointments in the specialized outpatient clinics of the above-mentioned centers. Follow-up duration was recorded based on the last follow-up year (LFU year). Follow-up data were unavailable for UMCEP patients due to institutional differences in record-keeping, but center-adjusted analyses confirmed no significant impact on overall conclusions. Endpoints of the study were the occurrence of ICH according to the ensuing reporting standards5: radiological evidence of an acute ICH of the CCM seen on a recent MRI accompanied by an acute or subacute onset of neurological symptoms related to the anatomical region of the lesion. Cavernoma related seizure was defined as a definite association of seizure with a circumscribed CCM according to an experienced neurologist in the above-mentioned centers. Neurological functional outcome was assessed through the mRS at the last available FU examination. A favorable outcome was defined as mRS ≤1, whereas an unfavorable outcome was defined as mRS ≥225.

Statistical Analysis

We used SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.) for all statistical analyses. We investigated the association of clinical data with the outcome (occurrence of ICH or seizure) during a lifetime follow-up period (i.e., follow-up time starting at birth) by performing mixed effects Cox regression analysis with direct adjusted survival curves for averaging the estimated survival curves and the study centers as random effect to fit a shared frailty model for clustered data. The approach used has the advantage of computing survival curves that reflect imbalance between treatment groups by averaging the predicted survival functions for covariates such as study center. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% Cls were reported2628. Model assumptions such as validity of the proportional hazards was confirmed prior to analysis. Data were censored if patients experienced a (re)bleeding (or seizure) or were lost to follow up. Overall survival curves were also computed for each study center separately. Direct center adjusted survival curves were also computed while excluding one center each from the analysis to check how strong the impact of singles study centers was on the overall shape of the survival curve. For the association of the occurrence of ICH and seizures with the mRS at last follow up, boxplots were presented. Furthermore, mixed effects logistic regression models adjusted for age at last follow up and sex with study center as random effect were calculated with dichotomous mRS as the dependent variable and ICH/seizures as the independent variable.

Results

Patient Demographics

A total of 1592 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 45.5 ± 18.4 years and 886 patients (55.7%) were female. 775 patients (48.7%) suffered from a SH and 447 (28.1%) revealed at least one seizure during FU. The mean age at outcome occurrence was 36.3 ± 18.2, and 29.3 ± 17.6 years respectively. 29.3% (466 patients) received at least one surgical resection of a lesion, whereas only 2.8% (45 patients) underwent radiosurgery. Most patients with available genetic testing had a CCM1 mutation (494 patients; 31%), while 76 (4.8%) and 30 (1.9%) patients had a CCM2 or CCM3 mutation, respectively. Out of all patients included in our analysis, 869 patients (54.6%) revealed a confirmed FCM diagnosis, and the other 723 patients (45.4%) had an assumed FCM diagnosis. Although most patients (775 patients; 74%) demonstrated a favorable functional outcome at the last FU, 271 patients (26%) suffered from an unfavorable mRS at the last FU. (Table 1)

Table 1:

Demographic, anatomic and clinical characteristics.

Characteristic Frequency
Total number of patients, n 1592
Age at last FU, years, mean ± SD* 45.5 ± 18.4
Female sex, n (%) 886 (55.7 %)
Bleeding, n (%) 775 (48.7 %)
Age at bleeding, years, mean ± SD 36.3 ± 18.2
Seizure, n (%) 447 (28.1 %)
Age at seizure, years, mean ± SD 29.3 ± 17.6
Treatment modality, n (%): 511 (32.1%)
 - Neurosurgery, n (%) 466 (29.3 %)
 - Radiosurgery, n (%) 45 (2.8 %)
 - Multiple treatments, n (%) 50 (3.1 %)
Genetic mutation1:
 - CCM1, n (%) 494 (31.0 %)
 - CCM2, n (%) 76 (4.8 %)
 - CCM3, n (%) 30 (1.9 %)
Familial Disease:
 - Confirmed, n (%) 869 (54.6 %)
 - Assumed, n (%) 723 (45.4%)
Functional Outcome at last FU (mRS), n (%)§
 - 0 334 (31.9 %)
 −1 441 (42.1 %)
 −2 138 (13.2 %)
 −3 77 (7.4 %)
 - 4 38 (3.6 %)
 - 5 8 (0.8 %)
 - 6 11 (1.1 %)

CCM indicates cerebral cavernous malformation; SD, standard deviation; n, number of patients; FU, follow-up; mRS, modified ranking scale.

1

not tested for genetic mutation or no mutation detected in 992 patients.

*

38 patients missing;

837 patients missing;

1149 patients missing;

§

545 patients missing.

Cumulative lifetime probability of hemorrhage

A total of 755 first SH events occurred during a median follow up time of 42 years (IQR: 27–55) across all centers, leading to 64146 person-years of follow up with an incidence rate of 11.8 events per 1000 person-years. Until ~20 years of age the event rate was slightly lower compared to the overall risk later in life, while after 20 years of age the event rate remained constant across the life course with an overall lifetime risk of first bleeding of ~80% (Figure 2a).

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

(A) Bleeding events through Kaplan-Meier curves of the complete cohort, (B) stratified by center (associated center is marked on the right end of the figure with a personal color and form), and (C) stratified by genetic mutation (CCM1 shown in blue; CCM2 shown in green; CCM3 shown in red) The numbers of patients at risk are shown in a corner of each graph. HR of ICH between CCM1 VS CCM2 = 0.840/ HR of ICH between CCM3 VS CCM1 = 1.799

Survival curves for each center separately can be found in Figure 2b. Although this figure shows some heterogeneous results between centers, the exclusion of one center each from the analysis had no strong impact on the overall shape of the survival curve, meaning that the overall shape of the pooled survival curve did not seem to be mainly driven by a single center.

Mixed effects Cox regression analysis in patients with non-missing information on gene status indicated that patients with a CCM3 mutation had a higher risk of bleeding across their life course compared to patients suffering from a CCM1 (p = 0.047; HR: 1.799; 95% CI: 1.008 – 3.208). The risk of bleeding in patients with a CCM2 mutation was slightly lower compared to patients with CCM1 (p = 0.426; HR: 0.840; 95% CI: 0.548 – 1.290) mutation. (Figure 2c).

Cumulative lifetime probability of Cavernoma related seizure

A total of 443 first seizure events occurred during a median follow up time of 43 years (IQR: 26–57 years), leading to 64927 person-years of follow up with an incidence rate of 6.8 events per 1000 person-years. The event rate of seizure remained constant across the life course with a lifetime seizure risk of ~45% in the study population as seen in Figure 3a. After the exclusion of one center that did not assess seizure events in their patients, survival curves were performed for each remaining center separately (Figure 3b). As with bleeding risk, this figure shows some heterogeneity between centers. The exclusion of one center each from the pooled survival curve had no strong impact on its overall shape, meaning the pooled results did not seem to be mainly driven by a single center. Results of mixed effects Cox regression analysis gave no strong indication of a higher seizure risk in patients with a CCM3 mutation compared to patients suffering from a CCM1 (p = 0.400; HR: 1.373; 95% CI: 0.657 – 2.869). Patients with the CCM2 mutation showed no strong indication for a lower risk of seizure compared to patients with CCM1 (p = 0.287; HR: 0.764; CI: 0.466 – 1.254) mutation.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

(A) Seizure events through Kaplan-Meier curves of the complete cohort, (B) stratified by center (associated center is marked on the right end of the figure with a personal color and form), and (C) stratified by genetic mutation (CCM1 shown in blue; CCM2 shown in green; CCM3 shown in red) The numbers of patients at risk are shown in a corner of each graph. HR of ICH between CCM1 VS CCM2 = 0.764/ HR of ICH between CCM3 VS CCM1 = 1.373

Functional Outcome

Each center assessed the functional outcome of their patients at last available FU. Overall, we found a higher proportion of impaired functional outcome in patients after a bleeding event compared to patients without a bleeding event (figure 4a). Mixed effects logistic regression models adjusted for sex and age at last follow up showed an OR of 2.7 (95%Cl 1.98–3.73) for having an mRS of ≥2 after bleeding. Furthermore, we assessed the association of seizure and functional outcome in our cohort and equally found some indication for unfavorable functional outcomes in patients after a seizure event compared to patients without (Figure 4b). Mixed effects logistic regression models adjusted for sex and age at the last follow up showed an OR of 1.27 (95%Cl 0.93–1.75) for having an mRS of ≥2 after seizure.

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Box plot graphics showing the association between functional outcome through modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and siezure events (left graphic), as well as with ICH events (right graphic). mRS score schowed on the Y-axis, presence of seizure or ICH seen in the X-axis.

Discussion

Symptomatic hemorrhage in CCM is not rare and often prone to significant morbidity affecting quality of life2,46. Although patients suffering from FCM represent an important subgroup of this disease, studies investigating their natural course are missing9,10,13,1517,2931. Our study represents an unprecedented international collaboration, as well as the largest observational cohort of FCM studied so far. We analyzed data from FCM patients, assessed the lifetime risk of hemorrhage and/or seizure, and identified risk factors for unfavorable events. Finally, we evaluated the functional neurological outcome of patients in our cohort, as well as possible risk factors influencing their outcome.

Lifetime risk of Hemorrhage

We observed a constant event rate for ICH after ~20 years of age, as well as a lifetime ICH risk of ~80%. Previous large studies assessing bleeding risk in sporadic cases, as well as small cohorts assessing the latter in FCM show a 5-year cumulative risk of 20%2,9,15,21,32,33. Although not assessing the lifetime risk, such studies show an increasing risk for ICH throughout time, with studies even showing an increased risk going up to 30% in a 10-year FU period34. Their findings correlate with our data indicating a constant event rate for bleeding throughout time. Notably, we further segregated our cohort into groups according to their specific gene mutations. Here, we discovered a significantly more aggressive course of the disease with higher rates of ICH in patients suffering from CCM3 mutation. Such findings are in accordance with previous literature that assessed the latter and also found that patients with CCM3 mutation have a more aggressive course in comparison with CCM1 and CCM217.

Lifetime risk of Seizure

The lifetime risk of seizures in our cohort was ~45%. Although overall risk was lower than the lifetime risk for ICH, we also found constant seizure rates across the life course. So far, Fox and colleagues assessed the largest cohort analyzing the risk of seizure in patients with FCM22. The cumulative incidence of seizures was 60% by age 80 years, and risk of seizure was significantly higher in those with a genetically confirmed CCM3 mutation vs. CCM1 or CCM2 mutation. In our multi-center cohort (including the data of Fox et al. (n=479)) we found a slightly lower risk of a first seizure with constant event rates of seizure throughout time. We similarly observed a potentially more aggressive course of the disease in terms of seizure rates in patients with a CCM3 mutation.

Functional Outcome

Large studies regarding sporadic CCM, as well as some FCM studies assessing possible risk factors leading to an unfavorable functional outcome in patients with a sporadic CCM have been conducted2,4,9,17,3537. These studies validated a possible association between the occurrence of events (SH/seizure) and unfavorable functional outcome.

Accordingly, we found a higher proportion of impaired functional outcomes in patients after SH and/or seizure events, independent of age, reflecting the impact of these events on the patients’ functional performance. This effect was significantly stronger for patients with SH compared to seizures without SH.

Strengths and Limitations

The prevalence of CCM in the general population is around 0.5%2,7 and FCM represents 15–20% of these patients38, rendering large cohorts difficult. Our data is not population-based as we obtained it from multiple tertiary referral center, which can lead to selection biases. Moreover, part of the data was obtained in a retrospective study design and some data was already published in other studies of the respective centers. Another important factor is the potential overestimation of event rates due to the reduced penetrance of FCM. Prior studies indicate that up to 50% of individuals with pathogenic variants remain asymptomatic throughout their lifetime despite harboring multiple lesions9,39. This could suggest that the true risk of ICH and seizures in FCM may be lower than reported here. Nevertheless, our results outline a life course FU study on patients with a familial disease and contributes novel data in an international collaboration of the largest dataset of FCM patients to date, improving the precision of event rate estimates and risk factors substantially. Due to the multicenter nature of our study, discrepancies in terms of data extraction between centers were possible. Compared to other studies regarding FCM, our combined cohort seems representative in terms of patient characteristics21,22,24,40. Moreover, the substantial number of centers involved in our study showing pooled results in terms of lifetime risk of ICH and/or seizure were not strongly affected by any single center.

Future Directions

Despite the strengths of our study, several important questions remain unanswered, paving the way for future research. One of the key limitations of the current analysis is the lack of detailed lesion characterization, particularly regarding size, location, and growth dynamics. Given the increasing availability of advanced imaging modalities and automated volumetric analysis, future studies should aim to integrate standardized lesion measurements to assess their impact on ICH and seizure risk. Additionally, while our study provides crucial lifetime risk estimates for FCM, further work is needed to explore longitudinal lesion evolution and potential modifiers of disease severity, including genetic, environmental, and treatment-related factors. Prospective natural history studies incorporating systematic imaging follow-ups, genetic profiling, and functional assessments will be essential in refining risk stratification models and guiding personalized treatment approaches for FCM patients. Finally, given the challenges associated with studying rare diseases, establishing international collaborative registries with harmonized imaging and clinical data collection protocols will be critical in further advancing our understanding of FCM and optimizing patient management.

Conclusions

During a lifelong follow-up, the event rate for a first symptomatic hemorrhage or seizure remained constant over time reaching a cumulative risk of around 80% and 45%, respectively. Our findings indicate a more aggressive course in patients with CCM3 mutation. Occurrence of symptomatic hemorrhage and/or seizures were associated with a more unfavorable mRS outcome at last follow up, independent of age.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the BVMC Investigator Group for their contribution.

Sources of Funding

UK Medical Research Council, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government, and UK Stroke Association.

BVMC grant funding, U54NS065705.

Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms

FCM

familial CCM

CCM

cerebral cavernous malformations

DVA

developmental venous anomaly

ICH

intracerebral hemorrhage

FU

Follow-up

Footnotes

Previous Presentation

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

  • 1.Taslimi S, Modabbernia A, Amin-Hanjani S, Barker FG, Macdonald RL. Natural history of cavernous malformation. Neurology. 2016;86:1984–1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Horne MA, Flemming KD, Su IC, Stapf C, Jeon JP, Li D, Maxwell SS, White P, Christianson TJ, Agid R, et al. Clinical course of untreated cerebral cavernous malformations: A meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:166–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moore SA, Brown RD, Christianson TJH, Flemming KD. Long-term natural history of incidentally discovered cavernous malformations in a single-center cohort: Clinical article. J. Neurosurg 2014;120:1188–1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moultrie F, Horne MA, Josephson CB, Hall JM, Counsell CE, Bhattacharya JJ, Papanastassiou V, Sellar RJ, Warlow CP, Murray GD, et al. Outcome after surgical or conservative management of cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurology. 2014;83:582–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Salman RAS, Berg MJ, Morrison L, Awad IA. Hemorrhage from cavernous malformations of the brain: Definition and reporting standards. Stroke. 2008;39:3222–3230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akers A, Al-Shahi Salman R, Awad IA, Dahlem K, Flemming K, Hart B, Kim H, Jusue-Torres I, Kondziolka D, Lee C, et al. Synopsis of guidelines for the clinical management of cerebral cavernous malformations: Consensus recommendations based on systematic literature review by the angioma alliance scientific advisory board clinical experts panel. Clin. Neurosurg 2017;80:665–680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Batra S, Lin D, Recinos PF, Zhang J, Rigamonti D. Cavernous malformations: Natural history, diagnosis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Neurol [Internet]. 2009;5:659–670. Available from: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ricci C, Cerase A, Riolo G, Manasse G, Battistini S. KRIT1 Gene in Patients with Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: Clinical Features and Molecular Characterization of Novel Variants. J. Mol. Neurosci 2021; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zafar A, Quadri SA, Farooqui M, Ikram A, Robinson M, Hart BL, Mabray MC, Vigil C, Tang AT, Kahn ML, et al. Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations. Stroke. 2019;50:1294–1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mespreuve M, Vanhoenacker F, Lemmerling M. Familial multiple cavernous malformation syndrome: MR features in this uncommon but silent threat. Jbr-Btr 2016;100:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gross BA, Lin N, Du R, Day AL. The natural history of intracranial cavernous malformations. Neurosurg. Focus 2011;30:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dammann P, Wrede K, Zhu Y, Matsushige T, Maderwald S, Umutlu L, Quick HH, Hehr U, Rath M, Ladd ME, et al. Correlation of the venous angioarchitecture of multiple cerebral cavernous malformations with familial or sporadic disease: A susceptibility-weighted imaging study with 7-Tesla MRI. J. Neurosurg 2017;126:570–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morrison L, Akers A. Cerebral Cavernous Malformation, Familial Summary Genetic counseling Diagnosis Suggestive Findings. GeneReviews. 2003;1993–2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Flemming KD, Link MJ, Christianson TJH, Brown RD. Prospective hemorrhage risk of intracerebral cavernous malformations. Neurology. 2012;78:632–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Santos AN, Rauschenbach L, Saban D, Chen B, Darkwah Oppong M, Herten A, Gull HH, Rieß C, Deuschl C, Schmidt B, et al. Multiple cerebral cavernous malformations: Clinical course of confirmed, assumed and non-familial disease. Eur. J. Neurol 2022;1427–1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Santos AN, Rauschenbach L, Saban D, Chen B, Lenkeit A, Gull HH, Rieß C, Deuschl C, Schmidt B, Jabbarli R, et al. Medication intake and hemorrhage risk in patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations. J. Neurosurg [Internet]. 2022;1–7. Available from: https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/aop/article-10.3171-2022.1.JNS212724/article-10.3171-2022.1.JNS212724.xml [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Denier C, Labauge P, Bergametti F, Marchelli F, Riant F, Arnoult M, Maciazek J, Vicaut E, Brunereau L, Tournier-Lasserve E. Genotype-phenotype correlations in cerebral cavernous malformations patients. Ann. Neurol 2006;60:550–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jeon JS, Kim JE, Chung YS, Oh S, Ahn JH, Cho WS, Son YJ, Bang JS, Kang HS, Sohn CH, et al. A risk factor analysis of prospective symptomatic haemorrhage in adult patients with cerebral cavernous malformation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2014;85:1366–1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zabramski JM, Wascher TM, Spetzler RF, Johnson B, Golfinos J, Drayer BP, Brown B, Rigamonti D, Brown G. The natural history of familial cavernous malformations: Results of an ongoing study. J. Neurosurg 1994;80:422–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carrión-Penagos J, Zeineddine HA, Polster SP, Girard R, Lyne SB, Koskimäki J, Romanos S, Srinath A, Zhang D, Cao Y, et al. Subclinical imaging changes in cerebral cavernous angiomas during prospective surveillance. J. Neurosurg 2020;134:1147–1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Weinsheimer S, Nelson J, Abla AA, Ko NU, Tsang C, Okoye O, Zabramski JM, Akers A, Zafar A, Mabray MC, et al. Intracranial Hemorrhage Rate and Lesion Burden in Patients With Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformation. J. Am. Heart Assoc 2023;12:e027572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fox CK, Nelson J, McCulloch CE, Weinsheimer S, Pawlikowska L, Hart B, Mabray MC, Zafar A, Morrison L, Zabramski JM, et al. Seizure Incidence Rates in Children and Adults With Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations. Neurology. 2021;97:E1210–E1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Akers AL, Ball KL, Clancy M, Comi AM, Faughnan ME, Gopal-Srivastava R, Jacobs TP, Kim H, Krischer J, Marchuk DA, et al. Brain Vascular Malformation Consortium: Overview, Progress and Future Directions. J. rare Disord [Internet]. 2013;1:5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25221778%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4160161 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Petersen TA, Morrison LA, Schrader RM, Hart BL. Familial versus sporadic cavernous malformations: Differences in developmental venous anomaly association and lesion phenotype. Am. J. Neuroradiol 2010;31:377–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Santos AN, Rauschenbach L, Darkwah Oppong M, Chen B, Herten A, Forsting M, Sure U, Dammann P. Assessment and validation of proposed classification tools for brainstem cavernous malformations. J. Neurosurg 2020;1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Balan TA, Putter H. A tutorial on frailty models. Stat. Methods Med. Res 2020;29:3424–3454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu Z-H, Peter Gale R, Zhang M-J. Direct adjusted survival and cumulative incidence curves for observational studies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020;55:538–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.GRAMBSCH PM, THERNEAU TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika [Internet]. 1994;81:515–526. Available from: 10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zuurbier SM, Hickman CR, Tolias CS, Rinkel LA, Leyrer R, Flemming KD, Bervini D, Lanzino G, Wityk RJ, Schneble HM, et al. Long-term antithrombotic therapy and risk of intracranial haemorrhage from cerebral cavernous malformations: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol [Internet]. 2019;18:935–941. Available from: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30231-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li DA, Hao SYU, Jia GJ, Wu Z, Zhang LIW, Zhang JT. Hemorrhage risks and functional outcomes of untreated brainstem cavernous malformations: Clinical article. J. Neurosurg 2014;121:32–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao Y, Du GH, Wang YF, Wu JS, Xie LQ, Mao Y, Zhou LF. Multiple intracranial cavernous malformations: clinical features and treatment. Surg. Neurol 2007;68:493–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gross BA, Du R, Orbach DB, Scott RM, Smith ER. The natural history of cerebral cavernous malformations in children. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr 2016;17:123–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen B, Herten A, Saban D, Rauscher S, Radbruch A, Schmidt B, Zhu Y, Jabbarli R, Wrede KH, Kleinschnitz C, et al. Hemorrhage from cerebral cavernous malformations: The role of associated developmental venous anomalies. Neurology. 2020;95:89–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Santos AN, Rauschenbach L, Gull HH, Olbrich A, Dinger TF, Darkwah Oppong M, Rieß C, Chen B, Lenkeit A, Schmidt B, et al. Natural course of cerebral and spinal cavernous malformations: a complete ten-year follow-up study. Sci. Rep [Internet]. 2023;13:1–7. Available from: 10.1038/s41598-023-42594-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dammann P, Wrede K, Jabbarli R, Neuschulte S, Menzler K, Zhu Y, Özkan N, Müller O, Forsting M, Rosenow F, et al. Outcome after conservative management or surgical treatment for new-onset epilepsy in cerebral cavernous malformation. J. Neurosurg 2017;126:1303–1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Santos AN, Rauschenbach L, Gull HH, Dinger TF, Chihi M, Li Y, Tippelt S, Dohna-Schwake C, Schmidt B, Jabbarli R, et al. Functional Outcome after Initial and Multiple Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Children with Cerebral Cavernous Malformations. Eur. J. Neurol [Internet]. 2023;n/a. Available from: 10.1111/ene.15749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Taslimi S, Ku JC, Modabbernia A, Macdonald RL. Hemorrhage, Seizures, and Dynamic Changes of Familial versus Nonfamilial Cavernous Malformation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:241–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Haasdijk RA, Cheng C, Maat-Kievit AJ, Duckers HJ. Cerebral cavernous malformations: From molecular pathogenesis to genetic counselling and clinical management. Eur. J. Hum. Genet 2012;20:134–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Flemming KD, Smith E, Marchuk D, Brent W. Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations. 2003. [PubMed]
  • 40.Salman RAS, Hall JM, Horne MA, Moultrie F, Josephson CB, Bhattacharya JJ, Counsell CE, Murray GD, Papanastassiou V, Ritchie V, et al. Untreated clinical course of cerebral cavernous malformations: A prospective, population-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol [Internet]. 2012;11:217–224. Available from: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70004-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

De-identified participant data, study protocol, and statistical analysis plan will be available upon request for five years after publication. Researchers with valid scientific requests can contact the corresponding author at philipp.dammann@uk-essen.de. Access will comply with institutional and ethical regulations.

RESOURCES