Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1993 Jun;217(6):688–698. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199306000-00011

Carbon dioxide gas as an arterial contrast agent.

J M Seeger 1, S Self 1, T R Harward 1, T C Flynn 1, I F Hawkins Jr 1
PMCID: PMC1242879  PMID: 8507115

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical utility of CO2 gas as an arterial contrast agent, the experience with CO2 arteriography at the University of Florida was reviewed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Preliminary studies have demonstrated the feasibility of CO2 arteriography and shown that arterial injection of CO2 gas appears non-toxic (which could limit the risks of contrast induced renal injury and allergic reaction). However, numerous technical problems make CO2 arteriography a demanding technique and recent studies have suggested that distal lower extremity vessels are difficult to image using CO2 arteriography, especially when significant arterial occlusive disease is present. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight CO2 arteriograms done in 115 patients were reviewed. CO2 arteriograms were graded as excellent, good, poor, or inadequate by two blinded observers and results of CO2 studies compared to results of standard contrast studies (done in 98 patients for image comparison). In addition, a therapeutic plan based on the CO2 arteriograms was compared with the therapy each patient received. RESULTS: One hundred-seventeen (91%) of the CO2 arteriograms were of good or excellent quality and agreement between CO2 studies and standard contrast studies was seen in 93 of 98 cases (95%). Accurate therapeutic plans based on CO2 studies were possible in 92% of cases with inadequate visualization of infrapopliteal arteries being the major limitation (7 cases). No allergic reactions occurred and only one patient potentially had contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CO2 arteriography provides accurate, clinically useful arterial imaging with minimal risk. Thus, this new technology significantly increases the utility of arteriography in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Full text

PDF
688

Images in this article

690Figure 2.
on p.690
691Figure 3.
on p.691
692Figure 4.
on p.692
693Figure 5.
on p.693
694Figure 6.
on p.694
695Figure 7.
on p.695
695Figure 7.
on p.695
696Figure 8.
on p.696
696Figure 9.
on p.696

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ansell G., Tweedie M. C., West C. R., Evans P., Couch L. The current status of reactions to intravenous contrast media. Invest Radiol. 1980 Nov-Dec;15(6 Suppl):S32–S39. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198011001-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARRERA F., DURANT T. M., LYNCH P. R., OPPENHEIMER M. J., STAUFFER H. M., STEWART G. H., 3rd In vivo visualization of intracardiac structures with gaseous carbon dioxide; cardiovascular-respiratory effects and associated changes in blood chemistry. Am J Physiol. 1956 Aug;186(2):325–334. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.186.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burko H., Klatte E. C. Renewed interest in gases for contrast roentgenography. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1967 Mar;99(3):645–659. doi: 10.2214/ajr.99.3.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coffey R., Quisling R. G., Mickle J. P., Hawkins I. F., Jr, Ballinger W. B. The cerebrovascular effects of intraarterial CO2 in quantities required for diagnostic imaging. Radiology. 1984 May;151(2):405–410. doi: 10.1148/radiology.151.2.6424174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gomes A. S., Baker J. D., Martin-Paredero V., Dixon S. M., Takiff H., Machleder H. I., Moore W. S. Acute renal dysfunction after major arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Dec;145(6):1249–1253. doi: 10.2214/ajr.145.6.1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall K. A., Wong R. W., Hunter G. C., Camazine B. M., Rappaport W. A., Smyth S. H., Bull D. A., McIntyre K. E., Bernhard V. M., Misiorowski R. L. Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: the effects of vasodilator therapy. J Surg Res. 1992 Oct;53(4):317–320. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(92)90054-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hartman G. W., Hattery R. R., Witten D. M., Williamson B., Jr Mortality during excretory urography: Mayo Clinic experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Nov;139(5):919–922. doi: 10.2214/ajr.139.5.919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hawkins I. F. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Jul;139(1):19–24. doi: 10.2214/ajr.139.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katayama H., Yamaguchi K., Kozuka T., Takashima T., Seez P., Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990 Jun;175(3):621–628. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Katzberg R. W., Morris T. W., Lasser E. C., DiMarco P. L., Merguerian P. A., Ventura J. A., Pabico R. C., McKenna B. A. Acute systemic and renal hemodynamic effects of meglumine/sodium diatrizoate 76% and iopamidol in euvolemic and dehydrated dogs. Invest Radiol. 1986 Oct;21(10):793–797. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198610000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lasser E. C., Berry C. C., Talner L. B., Santini L. C., Lang E. K., Gerber F. H., Stolberg H. O. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 1;317(14):845–849. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710013171401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Martin-Paredero V., Dixon S. M., Baker J. D., Takiff H., Gomes A. S., Busuttil R. W., Moore W. S. Risk of renal failure after major angiography. Arch Surg. 1983 Dec;118(12):1417–1420. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390120045012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meltzer R. S., Serruys P. W., Hugenholtz P. G., Roelandt J. Intravenous carbon dioxide as an echocardiographic contrast agent. J Clin Ultrasound. 1981 Mar;9(3):127–131. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870090306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller F. J., Mineau D. E., Koehler P. R., Nelson J. A., Luers P. D., Sherry R. A., Lawrence F. P., Anderson R. E., Kruger R. A. Clinical intra-arterial digital subtraction imaging. Use of small volumes of iodinated contrast material or carbon dioxide. Radiology. 1983 Jul;148(1):273–278. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.1.6407063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moore R. M., Braselton C. W. INJECTIONS OF AIR AND OF CARBON DIOXIDE INTO A PULMONARY VEIN. Ann Surg. 1940 Aug;112(2):212–218. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194008000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PHILLIPS J. H., Jr, BURCH G. E., HELLINGER R. The use of intracardiac carbon dioxide in the diagnosis of pericardial disease. Am Heart J. 1961 Jun;61:748–755. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(61)90458-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parfrey P. S., Griffiths S. M., Barrett B. J., Paul M. D., Genge M., Withers J., Farid N., McManamon P. J. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. A prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 19;320(3):143–149. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901193200303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SCATLIFF J. H., KUMMER A. J., JANZEN A. H. The diagnosis of pericardial effusion with intracardiac carbon dioxide. Radiology. 1959 Dec;73:871–883. doi: 10.1148/73.6.871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schwab S. J., Hlatky M. A., Pieper K. S., Davidson C. J., Morris K. G., Skelton T. N., Bashore T. M. Contrast nephrotoxicity: a randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 19;320(3):149–153. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901193200304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shehadi W. H., Toniolo G. Adverse reactions to contrast media: a report from the Committee on Safety of Contrast Media of the International Society of Radiology. Radiology. 1980 Nov;137(2):299–302. doi: 10.1148/radiology.137.2.7433658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shifrin E. G., Plich M. B., Verstandig A. G., Gomori M. Cerebral angiography with gaseous carbon dioxide CO2. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1990 Sep-Oct;31(5):603–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Turner A. F., Meyers H. I., Jacobson G., Lo W. Carbon dioxide cineangiocardiography in the diagnosis of pericardial disease. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1966 Jun;97(2):342–349. doi: 10.2214/ajr.97.2.342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weaver F. A., Pentecost M. J., Yellin A. E., Davis S., Finck E., Teitelbaum G. Clinical applications of carbon dioxide/digital subtraction arteriography. J Vasc Surg. 1991 Feb;13(2):266–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES