Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to prospectively define the impact of laparoscopy on the management of patients with a presumed diagnosis of appendicitis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: While the role of laparoscopy in the management of cholelithiasis is well established, its impact on the management of acute appendicitis needs to be objectively defined and compared to that of conventional management. Several authors have predicted that laparoscopic appendectomy will become the preferred treatment for appendicitis. METHODS: Two groups of consecutive patients with similar clinical characteristics of acute appendicitis were compared. Data on the laparoscopic group were compiled prospectively on standardized forms; data on the conventional group were collected retrospectively. Operative time, hospital stay, analgesia, cost, and return to normal activities were noted. RESULTS: Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy were compared to 18 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopy (16 of these 18 had laparoscopic appendectomy). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical characteristics and appendiceal histopathology. The mean operative times were 61 +/- 4.1 minutes and 46 +/- 2.9 minutes for the laparoscopy and conventional groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic appendectomy group, with 81% of patients being discharged on their first postoperative day (p < 0.001). The laparoscopic appendectomy patients required significantly less narcotic analgesia (p < 0.02). Return to normal activity was not significantly different between the two groups. The average total cost of laparoscopic appendectomy was 30% greater than that of conventional appendectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is a useful adjunct to the management of patients with a presumed clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Full text
PDF







Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Gangal H. T., Gangal M. H. Laparoscopic appendicectomy. Endoscopy. 1987 May;19(3):127–129. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakhgevany K. B., Clarke L. E. Acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. Arch Surg. 1986 Sep;121(9):1053–1055. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400090083014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nowzaradan Y., Westmoreland J., McCarver C. T., Harris R. J. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indications and current use. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991 Oct;1(5):247–257. doi: 10.1089/lps.1991.1.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pier A., Götz F., Bacher C. Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):8–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saye W. B., Rives D. A., Cochran E. B. Laparoscopic appendectomy: three years' experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Jun;1(2):109–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983 Mar;15(2):59–64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soper N. J., Barteau J. A., Clayman R. V., Ashley S. W., Dunnegan D. L. Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Feb;174(2):114–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spirtos N. M., Eisenkop S. M., Spirtos T. W., Poliakin R. I., Hibbard L. T. Laparoscopy--a diagnostic aid in cases of suspected appendicitis. Its use in women of reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):90–94. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90212-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoker M. E., Vose J., O'Mara P., Maini B. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A clinical and financial analysis of 280 operations. Arch Surg. 1992 May;127(5):589–595. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420050117015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitworth C. M., Whitworth P. W., Sanfillipo J., Polk H. C., Jr Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in young women with possible appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Sep;167(3):187–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
