Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Sep 13;38(10):e70144. doi: 10.1002/nbm.70144

Relaxation‐Selective Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging of Microvascular Perfusion and Fluid Compartments in the Human Choroid Plexus

Chenyang Li 1,, Zhe Sun 1,2, Jiangyang Zhang 1, Yulin Ge 1,
PMCID: PMC12433185  PMID: 40944620

ABSTRACT

The choroid plexus (ChP) is critical to the glymphatic system of the human brain through its primary function as the source of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) production, which plays an important role in brain waste clearance. Developing noninvasive imaging techniques to assess ChP is crucial for studying its function and age‐related neurofluid dynamics. In this study, we developed a relaxation‐selective intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) technique to assess tissue and fluid compartments in the ChP of 83 middle‐aged to elderly participants (age: 61.5 ± 17.1 years) and 15 young controls (age: 30.7 ± 2.9 years). Using a 3‐T MRI scanner, we implemented T1‐ and T2‐selective IVIM approaches, including Fluid‐Attenuated Inversion Recovery IVIM (FLAIR‐IVIM), LongTE‐IVIM, and Vascular Space Occupancy‐LongTE‐IVIM (VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM), to measure diffusivity and volume fractions of fluid compartments in ChP. Our results showed that FLAIR‐IVIM identified an additional interstitial fluid (ISF) compartment with free‐water‐like diffusivity in ChP. We then evaluated the aging effects on microvascular perfusion and ISF in ChP. Compared to younger adults, older adults exhibited increased ChP volume, reduced perfusion, decreased ISF volume fraction, and lower tissue diffusivity. Relaxation‐selective IVIM may offer enhanced specificity for characterizing age‐related changes in ChP structure and fluid dynamics.

Keywords: cerebrospinal fluid, choroid plexus, interstitial fluid, intravoxel incoherent motion, microvascular perfusion, subvoxel heterogeneity


The choroid plexus (ChP) plays a key role in the brain's glymphatic system through its primary function of producing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In this study, we developed relaxation‐selective intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI, including FLAIR‐IVIM, LongTE‐IVIM, and VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM, to assess age‐related changes in vascular and fluid compartments in the ChP. Compared with younger adults, older adults exhibited enlarged ChP volume with reduced perfusion, interstitial fluid fraction, and tissue diffusivity, highlighting age‐related alterations in microvasculature and fluid dynamics in ChP.

graphic file with name NBM-38-e70144-g007.jpg


Abbreviations

ad

Alzheimer's disease

ADC

apparent diffusion coefficient

ADRD

Alzheimer's disease–related dementia

ASL

arterial spin labeling

BCSFB

blood–CSF barrier

ChP

choroid plexus

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

DCE

dynamic contrast enhanced

DSC

dynamic susceptibility contrast

EPI

echo planar imaging

FLAIR

Fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery

GMM

Gaussian mixture model

ILT

inverse Laplace transform

ISF

interstitial fluid

IVIM

intravoxel incoherent motion

MPRAGE

magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient echo

OGSE

oscillating gradient spin echo

SWI

susceptibility‐weighted imaging

VASO

vascular space occupancy

1. Introduction

Choroid plexus (ChP) is a highly vascularized structure situated within the ventricles of the brain (Figure 1a). Its primary function is to produce the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which is essential to deliver nutrients, provide mechanical protection, and facilitate metabolic waste removal for the brain [1]. Additionally, the ChP acts as the primary site of the blood–CSF barrier (BCSFB), playing a vital role in regulating the exchange of water between the capillary blood and CSF [2, 3]. Recent proteomic analyses of CSF samples have revealed that an enlarged ChP and its associated dysfunction could be a characteristic feature of certain subtypes of Alzheimer's disease (ad) [4]. This suggests that the ChP may have a significant role in the onset and progression of age‐related neurodegenerative diseases [5, 6].

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

An overview of ChP functions and the three‐compartment IVIM model used in this study. (a) The ChP is located in the ventricles and has a highly convoluted surface. (b) The production of CSF includes exchange between the vascular and stromal spaces and between stromal space and ventricles. (c) We hypothesize that the fluid compartments in the ChP can be studied using the three‐compartment IVIM method enhanced with relaxation modulation.

The ChP produces CSF through a two‐step process (Figure 1b). Water, ions, and nutrients from the blood plasma first filter through the fenestrated capillaries into the stromal tissue, primarily driven by hydrostatic pressure. Following this process, the ChP's epithelial cells selectively transport these elements into the ventricles, where they become CSF [2, 3]. To gain insights into CSF production, BCSFB functions, and waste clearance, it is key to assess the in vivo dynamics among blood, interstitial fluid, and CSF inside the ChP.

Currently, noninvasive evaluation of vascular functions of the ChP primarily uses contrast‐based MRI techniques, including dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) [7, 8], dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC‐MRI) [9], and ferumoxytol‐enhanced susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI) [10]. Contrast agents enhance the vascular space of the ChP, providing valuable information on vascular density, cerebral blood volume, and potentially BCSFB functions. However, gadolinium‐based contrast agents present challenges due to difficulties in intravenous access and their potential risks, involving allergic reactions, deposition, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Therefore, it is preferable to use non‐contrast techniques, such as arterial spin labeling (ASL) to assess vascular perfusion of ChP [11, 12] and the functions of BCSFB [13, 14, 15, 16]. Due to ASL's low resolution (~2.5–3 mm) and ChP's small size, non‐contrast assessment of structures and functions of the ChP, such as microvascular perfusion and other fluid dynamics (e.g., CSF or interstitial fluid [ISF]), remains challenging, as its special location within the CSF‐filled ventricles leads to inevitable interference and substantial partial volume effects from the free ventricular CSF.

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a diffusion MRI technique sensitive to microvascular perfusion. Initially proposed by Le Bihan et al. [17, 18, 19], the IVIM model typically includes a fast diffusion component from blood flow in the capillary bed, known as pseudo‐diffusion, a free water component in certain cases, and a slow diffusion component from tissue (Figure 1c). IVIM has been extensively used to examine perfusion functions in the vascular‐rich structures such as the liver [20], kidney [21], and tumors [22]. Given the ChP's high vascularization and fenestrated capillary glomus, similar to the kidney, we hypothesize that IVIM can potentially be used to evaluate microvascular perfusion in the ChP. Furthermore, IVIM can also be extended for simultaneous evaluation of the ChP's microstructural integrity, which is not available from contrast‐enhanced MRI.

To date, only a limited number of studies have evaluated the feasibility of using IVIM to measure capillary perfusion [23] or assess the integrity of ChP tissue. In this research, we developed relaxation‐selective IVIM to simultaneously and separately analyze the tissue water, blood, and CSF compartments in the ChP, leveraging their distinct relaxation properties. Our techniques have demonstrated potential in identifying abnormalities and age‐related changes in the ChP. Mapping of microvascular perfusion and other fluid compartments in the ChP could serve as an early diagnostic marker for assessing ChP functions in aging or age‐related neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ad/ADRD).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Characteristics

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. With HIPAA‐compliant and IRB‐approved acquisition policy, we recruited 15 young healthy controls (age: 30.7 ± 2.9, F/M = 11/4) and 86 middle‐aged to elderly subjects (age: 61.5 ± 17.1, F/M = 52/31) recommended for MRI examination. All participants were given written informed consent before MRI scans.

2.2. Pulse Sequences

Clinical MRI examinations were performed on a Siemens 3.0‐T Prisma system using the 64‐channel head coil. Clinical MR protocols include (a) 3D T1‐magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (T1‐MPRAGE), 3D T2‐fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (T2‐FLAIR), and susceptibility‐weighted images (SWI). T1‐MPRAGE images were acquired with the following parameters: TE/TR = 2.96/2300 ms; matrix size = 256 × 256 × 208; voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3. T2‐FLAIR images were acquired with TE/TR = 438 ms/4800 ms; matrix size = 256 × 256 × 160; voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3. High‐resolution SWI was acquired with TE/TR = 22.5/38 ms; matrix size = 600 × 768 × 36; voxel size = 0.31 × 0.31 × 1.5 mm3.

IVIM experiments were performed using the standard diffusion‐weighted echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with a matrix size of 192 × 192 × 20 and a voxel size of 1.5 × 1.5 × 3 mm3. In this sequence, a 180° inversion pulse can be enabled before the diffusion encoding, with the inversion time (TI) modulating the T1‐weighting (Figure S1a) in the acquired images. The echo time (TE) can also be adjusted to modulate the T2‐weighting (Figure S1b). For example, the diffusion‐weighted signal (S) in a homogeneous environment can be modulated by the TI and TE based on the following equation:

S/S0=12eTI/T1+eTR/T1·eTE/T2·eb·D

where S 0 is the proton density and b and D are the diffusion weighting and diffusivity, respectively.

2.3. Imaging the Distributions of T1, T2 Relaxation and Diffusivity in the ChP

A series of T1‐weighting EPI data, called mTI data here, were acquired using the sequence shown in Figure S1a with 19 inversion times (TI = 0, 50, 325, 600, 875, 1150, 1430, 1800, 1980, 2250, 2530, 2800, 3080, 3350, 3630, 4180, 4450, 4730, and 5000 ms), TE/TR = 72/15000 ms, and no diffusion weighting. A series of T2‐weighted EPI data, called mTE data here, were acquired using the sequence shown in Figure S1b with 24 echo times (TE = 38, 43, 48, 53, 58, 63, 68, 73, 78, 83, 88, 93, 98, 103, 113, 123, 133, 143, 153, 163, 173, 183, 193, and 203 ms), TR = 8000 ms, and no diffusion weighting.

To obtain the distribution of diffusivity within the conventional IVIM framework, diffusion‐weighted MRI data with 15 b‐values (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 650, 800, and 1000 s/mm2) were acquired at the same image resolution as the T1 and T2‐weighted EPI data with TE/TR = 58/8000 ms. Representative mTI, mTE, and IVIM images are shown in Figure S2a,b. The acquisition time of the mTI, mTE, and IVIM scans were 14, 15, and 2 min, respectively. The performance of the inversion pulse was also evaluated using a Siemens doped‐water phantom with the same field of view and orientation as the human brain scans (Figure S3a). The inversion efficiency (η) was fitted to evaluate the homogeneity of 180° inverted magnetization (Figure S3b–e).

The mTI, mTE, and IVIM signals were analyzed using inverse Laplace transform (ILT) with an open‐source ILT package, which uses singular value decomposition with iterative optimization by Butler–Reed–Dawson methods [24]. Regularization parameters of 10−6 were used to solve the distribution of diffusivities P(T1), P(T2), and P(D) within the range of TE and TI and the b‐value used and were calculated by integrating over all the peak amplitudes and further divided by the total peak amplitude to normalize the fraction from 0 to 1.

2.4. Segmentation of the ChP

The ChP was segmented from the T1‐MPRAGE data (Figure 2a) using a Bayesian Gaussian mixture model (GMM) (https://github.com/EhsanTadayon/choroid‐plexus‐segmentation), which has shown improved segmentation accuracy for ChP [25]. The resulting segmentation was evaluated in the T1‐MPRAGE and T2‐FLAIR images (Figure 2b) and manually adjusted as needed. The mask was then transformed into the IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM, and LongTE‐IVIM for further analysis (Figure 2c). The ChP volume was calculated by multiplying the number of voxels in the ChP segmentation by the voxel volume of the T1‐MPRAGE data.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Segmentation of the choroid plexus and its appearances across different imaging sequences. (a) A representative T1‐MPRAGE image (left) and the choroid plexus segmentation results (right, red voxels). (b) The corresponding T2‐FLAIR image (left) and the segmentation results (right, red voxels). (c) The choroid plexus mask overlaid on the b0 images of IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM and LongTE‐IVIM. T1 and T2 selective IVIM acquisition schemes used in this study and representative images showing the ChP with different b‐values. Conventional IVIM (d) includes signals from the blood, CSF, and tissue water compartments. FLAIR‐IVIM (e) suppresses signals from the CSF compartments (shaded), as indicated by the dark ventricles in the non‐diffusion‐weighted (b = 0 s/mm2) image. LongTE‐IVIM (f) suppresses signals from the parenchymal tissue compartments, as indicated by the low tissue signals in the non‐diffusion‐weighted images. VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM (g) suppresses signals from both blood and parenchymal tissue compartments.

2.5. Conventional IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM, LongTE‐IVIM, and VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM

Given the distinct T1, T2 relaxation times of tissue, blood, and CSF, we proposed to selectively suppress one or two fluid compartments in order to enhance the sensitivity of IVIM to a particular fluid compartment. Specifically, we proposed three T1 and T2 selective IVIM acquisition schemes and compared them with the conventional IVIM acquisition.

  1. Conventional IVIM scans were performed with 15 b‐values (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 650, 800, and 1000 s/mm2), a single diffusion direction along the slice direction, and TE/TR = 73/8000 ms without the inversion preparation. The same selection of b‐values and diffusion direction were used for relaxation selective IVIM.

  2. Fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)‐IVIM were performed with an inversion recovery preparation targeting CSF with TI = 1800 ms to suppress CSF signals, TE/TR = 73/8000 ms.

  3. LongTE‐IVIM were performed with TE/TR = 183/8000ms and without the inversion preparation to suppress tissue signals, due to their relatively short T2 relaxation time, while maintaining blood and CSF signals.

  4. VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM were performed with TE/TI/TR = 183/1150/8000 ms. Inspired by vascular space occupancy fMRI (VASO‐fMRI) [26, 27], the selection of the TI to suppress blood was calculated given the previously reported blood T1 at 3T [28, 29] (T1,blood = 1624 ms). Theoretically, VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM only retains the CSF signal, which allows us to further explore the composition of fast diffusion components, assuming the blood signal is eliminated in this case. A single slice is used for this acquisition to avoid through‐plane flow artifacts in the ventricles.

Each sequence takes approximately 2 min, and images with each sequence were co‐registered before image analysis. To account for T1 and T2 effects induced by IR and different TE, the diffusion data were normalized with their individual S0 values. To analyze the diffusion spectrum, 1D ILT was applied on all IVIM datasets to derive the diffusivity and its distribution P(D) of different subvoxel diffusion compartments. Among the 86 elderly subjects, all of whom had FLAIR‐IVIM scans, 25 subjects had additional LongTE‐IVIM scans and 5 subjects for VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM as a preliminary exploratory study. Representative images of the four IVIM acquisition schemes are shown in Figure 2d–g. The noise map (σ) and residuals for each relaxation selection are shown in Figure S6 to illustrate the noise level of each relaxation selection IVIM acquisition. The SNR was calculated by dividing the mean signal intensity within the ChP ROI by the mean noise from the MPPCA noise map (σ). The resulting ChP SNRs were 50.6 ± 7.2, 12.2 ± 3.9, and 31.8 ± 12.7 for the b = 0 s/mm2 images acquired with IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM, and LongTE‐IVIM, respectively.

Following Wong et al. [30], a window from 1 × 10−4 to 1.5 × 10−3 mm2/s was used to calculate the fraction of slow diffusion in the parenchymal tissue. A window between 1.5 × 10−3 and 4 × 10−3 mm2/s was used to calculate the fraction of intermediate diffusion as it is within the region of free CSF or interstitial fluids, and a window above 4 × 10−3 mm2/s but lower than 1 mm2/s was used to calculate the fraction of the fast diffusion component (fIVIM).

2.6. Analytical Simulation

To better understand the signal evolution of different tissue types, we performed the analytical simulation to show the T2 signal decay and T1 signal recovery with respect to parenchymal tissue, CSF, and blood to illustrate the fractional spin population changes and corresponding SNR under different acquisition schemes (Figure S4a,b). We analytically solved the T1 signal recovery by assuming the T1,blood = 1560 ms, T1,CSF = 4000 ms, and T1,tissue = 800 ms. We also analyzed the T2 signal decay by assuming the T2,blood = 250 ms, T2,CSF = 3000 ms, and T2,tissue = 80 ms. This simulation provided us with the approximate composition of spin populations and tissue‐specific SNR for different experiments.

3. Results

3.1. The Tissue, Blood, and CSF Compartments in the ChP Can Be Separated Based on Their Distinct T1, T2, and Diffusivity Values

The T1 and T2 spectra from the ChP generated by ILT of the mTI and mTE data displayed three peaks with distinct T1 and T2 values. In the T1 spectrum (Figure 3a), two peaks had T1 values (1794.0 ± 145.5 ms and 4181.4 ± 579.7 ms, respectively, n = 10) that matched the T1s of blood and CSF in the literature [28]. The other peak, with relatively shorter T1 values (249.4 ± 98.6 ms, n = 10), likely belonged to the ChP tissue. In the T2 spectrum (Figure 3c), three peaks had T2 values corresponding to ChP tissue (31.8 ± 24.2 ms), blood (194.7 ± 87.4 ms), and CSF (3572.3 ± 1162.5 ms). In comparison, T1 and T2 spectra from the lateral ventricles showed only one peak with T1 and T2 values of CSF (Figure 3b,d).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Representative multiple inversion time (a), multiple echo time (c), and IVIM (e) data from the ChP. ILT results show the three‐peak distribution of T1, T2, and diffusivity in the ChP. In comparison, ILT results from the ventricular CSF (b,d,f) only show one peak.

The IVIM data from the ChP also exhibited three distinct peaks after ILT (Figure 3e). The peak with the fastest diffusivity (0.13 ± 0.11 mm2/s, n = 10) was in the IVIM regime (flow component as the diffusivity is higher than free water). The peak with diffusivity close to those of free water (2.9 ± 0.7 × 10−3 mm2/s, n = 10) likely originated from ventricular CSF and water‐filled chambers within the ChP. The peak with the lowest diffusivity (0.7 ± 0.5 × 10−3 mm2/s, n = 10) probably corresponded to the ChP tissue. In comparison, the IVIM data from the lateral ventricle (Figure 3f) only showed one peak with diffusivity of free water.

Although mTE, mTI, and IVIM data all displayed three peaks in the ChP, it remained unclear whether there was a one‐to‐one relationship among the relaxivity and diffusion results. For example, in the T2 spectrum, the peak with T2 of the CSF had a lower volume fraction (0.17 ± 0.09; Table 1) than the blood and tissue peaks (0.69 ± 0.11 and 0.13 ± 0.04, respectively; Table 1). A similar distribution was also observed in the T1 spectrum (Table 1). However, in the IVIM spectrum, the intermediate peak with diffusivity close to free water, presumably from CSF, had a higher volume fraction (0.85 ± 0.13; Table 1) than the tissue and blood combined (0.096 ± 0.03 and 0.05 ± 0.02, respectively; Table 1). The difference suggested that the intermediate diffusion component included contributions from non‐CSF sources.

TABLE 1.

Distribution of T1, T2 relaxation time and diffusivity in the ChP with their corresponding volume fraction P(T1), P(T2) and P(D).

Choroid plexus Tissue Blood CSF
T1 (ms) 249.4 ± 98.6 1794.0 ± 145.5 4181.4 ± 579.7
P(T1) 0.13 ± 0.04 0.69 ± 0.11 0.16 ± 0.08
Choroid plexus Tissue Blood CSF
T2 (ms) 31.8 ± 24.2 194.7 ± 87.4 3572.3 ± 1162.5
P(T2) 0.21 ± 0.11 0.64 ± 0.15 0.17 ± 0.09
Choroid plexus Slow (tissue water) Intermediate (CSF/ISF) Fast (flow)
D (×10−3 mm2/s) 0.36 ± 0.50 2.9 ± 0.7 41.5 ± 29.2
P(D) 0.096 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.13 0.05 ± 0.02

3.2. LongTE and FLAIR IVIM Provide Insights Into the ChP

To investigate the composition of the intermediate diffusion peak in the IVIM data, we first experimented with longTE acquisitions, in which signals from the short T2 peak in the T2 spectrum (31.8 ± 24.2 ms; Table 1) should be mostly attenuated. The signal attenuation curve of LongTE‐IVIM showed a faster decay in the ChP than conventional IVIM (Figure 4a). As expected, out of the three peaks in conventional IVIM (Figure 4d), ILT of the LongTE‐IVIM data from the ChP showed two peaks, without the slow diffusion peaks from conventional IVIM (Figure 4e), suggesting the slow diffusion peak consisted of water with short T2, most likely in the tissue (Figure 4c). As signals from tissue water were attenuated, the relative volume fractions of the fast and intermediate diffusion peaks changed from 0.05 ± 0.02 to 0.49 ± 0.17 and from 0.85 ± 0.13 to 0.51 ± 0.16, respectively, compared to conventional IVIM results (Table 2). The reduction in the relative volume fraction of the intermediate peak suggested that a portion of it might come from fluids with relatively short T2.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Representative log‐scale IVIM signal decay in the ChP acquired using conventional IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM, and LongTE‐IVIM (a). In comparison, mono‐exponential decay of CSF signal in the ventricles (b) with no apparent difference among results from the three IVIM method. (c) Representative images of T2‐FLAIR, SWI, and LongTE‐IVIM b = 0 and b = 1000 s/mm2 images of IVIM, LongTE‐IVIM, and FLAIR‐IVIM. The spectral results showing the diffusivity distribution in the ChP from conventional IVIM (d), LongTE‐IVIM (e), and FLAIR‐IVIM (f).

TABLE 2.

Summary of diffusivity and its corresponding volume fraction in the slow, intermediate and fast diffusion components from FLAIR‐IVIM and LongTE‐IVIM.

Choroid plexus Dslow (×10−3 mm2/s) Dint (×10−3 mm2/s) Dfast (×10−3 mm2/s) fD* (×10−3 mm2/s)
FLAIR‐IVIM 0.28 ± 0.31 2.4 ± 0.9 54.1 ± 36.8 0.005 ± 0.004
LongTE‐IVIM 2.8 ± 1.3 44.5 ± 25.0 0.024 ± 0.019
Choroid plexus fslow fint ffast
FLAIR‐IVIM 0.27 ± 0.13 0.62 ± 0.11 0.09 ± 0.05
LongTE‐IVIM 0.51 ± 0.16 0.49 ± 0.17

We then used the FLAIR preparation to suppress CSF and examine its impact on the intermediate peak. If the intermediate peak mainly came from free CSF, adding FLAIR will remove the intermediate diffusion peak. The signal attenuation curve of FLAIR‐IVIM did show a slower decay than conventional IVIM (Figure 4a). In the non‐diffusion‐weighted (b0) images, the ventricle appeared dark (Figure 4c), suggesting near‐complete removal of signals from free CSF. Surprisingly, the ILT result from FLAIR‐IVIM in the ChP still showed a substantial intermediate diffusion peak (Figure 4f), with a volume fraction of 0.62 ± 0.11 (Table 2), lower than in conventional IVIM but still higher than the slow and fast diffusion peaks combined (0.27 ± 0.13 and 0.09 ± 0.05, respectively; Table 2). These results suggested that the intermediate diffusion peak contained signals from both free CSF and fluid with T1 values distinct from CSF. In the ventricles, the signal attenuation curves acquired with the IVIM and LongTE‐IVIM methods showed no apparent difference (Figure 4b). Signal attenuation in the ventricles of FLAIR‐IVIM was not shown due to suppression of CSF signal. We did not combine FLAIR preparation with LongTE‐IVIM due to poor signal‐to‐noise.

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value from the ChP tissue was calculated using the data with a b‐value of 1000 s/mm2 and b0 to be consistent with b‐value sensitivity to tissue measured by conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The representative ADC map from IVIM and FLAIR‐IVIM are shown in Figure 5a,b and the ADC map from IVIM and LongTE‐IVIM are shown in Figure 5c,d The FLAIR‐IVIM showed a reduced tissue ADC of 1.2 ± 0.2 × 10−3 mm2/s compared to the conventional IVIM (2.5 ± 0.3 × 10−3 mm2/s, p < 0.0001), whereas the longTE‐IVIM data showed a higher tissue ADC value (2.8 ± 0.6 × 10−3 mm2/s). The difference was likely due to partial volume effects of the CSF, which were present in conventional and LongTE‐IVIM b0 images but suppressed in FLAIR‐IVIM b0 images.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Representative ADC map estimated from conventional IVIM (a,c: different subjects), FLAIR‐IVIM (b), and LongTE‐IVIM (d).

3.3. VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM Suggests the Potential CSF/ISF Flow in the ChP

We further explored the composition of the fast diffusion peak using the VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM, which should suppress most blood and tissue signals in the ChP (Figure 6a). The data still revealed an intermediate peak (D = 3.2 ± 0.6 × 10−3 mm2/s) with a volume fraction of 0.69 ± 0.23 (n = 5) and a fast diffusion peak (D* = 34.5 ± 29.3 × 10−3 mm2/s) with a volume fraction of 0.24 ± 0.18 (n = 5) (Figure 6b). Voxel‐wise mapping of the volume fraction of intermediate diffusion (fint; Figure 6d) and fast diffusion (fivim; Figure 6e) are shown overlaid on the non‐diffusion‐weighted (b0) images acquired with VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM (Figure 6c). The D* from VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM was lower than D* from conventional IVIM for the same subject. This remaining fast diffusion component with VASO preparation potentially indicates the presence of incoherent flow of other fluid with long T2, presumably CSF or ISF in the ChP (Figure 6e).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM of the ChP. (a) Representative T2‐FLAIR and SWI for structural references of the ChP. (b) VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM spectral results of the ChP, with the intermediate diffusion peak (in the blue‐colored region) and fast diffusion peak (in the brass‐colored region). (c) VASO‐LongTE‐b0 images of the ChP. (d) Voxel‐wise mapping of the volume fraction of intermediate diffusion components. (e) Voxel‐wise mapping of volume fraction of fast diffusion components in the ChP.

3.4. Microvascular Perfusion and the ISF Compartment Were Reduced in Elderly Subjects

We used the FLAIR‐IVIM technique to examine the ChP in elderly subjects. Representative b0 images from conventional IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM, and T2‐FLAIR sequences are illustrated for a young subject (Figure 7a) and an elderly subject (Figure 7b). Defined in the 1 mm isotropic resolution MPRAGE data, the volumes of the ChP in the elderly subjects without apparent ChP abnormality (e.g., cyst) (N = 46, age > 65 years old) were significantly higher than young subjects (N = 15, age between 18 and 35 years old) (Figure 7c). There was no significant difference in diffusivity of the intermediate diffusion peak between the elderly and young subjects (Figure 7d), but the volume fraction of the intermediate diffusion peak in the elderly subjects was significantly lower than the young subjects (Figure 7e). In addition, we reported fD*, defined as the product of the fraction (f) and diffusion coefficient (D*) of the fast peak, which has been shown to be related to cerebral blood flow [31]. The elderly subjects showed significantly reduced fD* and f fast compared to the young subjects (Figure 7f,g). Furthermore, the elderly subjects also showed significantly reduced tissue diffusivity compared to the young subjects (Figure 7h).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Comparisons of FLAIR‐IVIM results from young and elderly subjects. (a,b) Representative IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM, and T2‐FLAIR images of a 27‐year‐old young adult subject (A) and a 68‐year‐old elderly subject (B). (c) Comparison of the ChP volume from T1‐MPRAGE data between young (N = 15) and elderly (N = 46) subjects. Noted that the elderly population with apparent cyst structures were excluded for comparison. (d,e) Comparisons of the diffusivity and volume fraction of the intermediate diffusion peak between young and elderly subjects. (f,g) Comparisons of the fD*, volume fraction (ffast) of the fast diffusion peak between young and elderly subjects. (h) A comparison of tissue diffusivities between young and elderly. * and ** indicate significant difference between the two groups with p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.

3.5. ChP Cyst Exhibit Changes in Relaxivity and Diffusivity

Among 46 elderly populations, 11 elderly patients (age: 71.5 ± 9.5, F/M = 8/3) exhibited cysts or cyst‐like structures in the ChP in T1‐MPRAGE, T2‐FLAIR, and SWI results. Among them, all showed reduced diffusivity, indicated by hyper‐intense signals in diffusion‐weighted images without FLAIR preparation (Figure 8a,b), compared to normal ChP (Figure 4c). Some cysts still showed unsuppressed signals in the T2‐FLAIR images (Figure 8a) as in normal ChP (Figure 4c), whereas others were completely nulled in T2‐FLAIR images (Figure 8b), suggesting potential changes in relaxivities in the cysts. Under both cases, the cyst‐like structure was completely diminished in FLAIR‐IVIM images at high b‐values (e.g., 1000 s/mm2), suggesting the fluid compartment with reduced diffusivity had T1 values close to CSF.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Representative cases of choroid plexus cysts in the elderly. In (a) Case 1, the cysts exhibited restricted diffusion, and the cyst fluids was not fully suppressed by FLAIR and FLAIR‐IVIM, whereas (b) Case 2 demonstrated that the cyst fluids were suppressed by FLAIR, indicating its T1 value was similar to ventricular CSF.

4. Discussion

The ChP, known for its critical role in CSF production, waste removal, and BCSFB function, has garnered increasing attention, particularly regarding its link to age‐related dementia. In this study, we introduced a relaxation‐selective IVIM imaging technique designed to target the fluid compartments within the ChP based on their unique relaxivities. This method provides more specific information than conventional IVIM imaging. Our findings revealed a reduction in microvascular perfusion in the ChP of older subjects compared to young counterparts. Additionally, we discovered an ISF compartment within the ChP, which exhibits a reduced volume in older subjects. The relaxation‐selective IVIM approach offers novel insights into the ChP's substructure and its functional implications in CSF dynamics. With a rapid acquisition time of about 2 min for each of the IVIM acquisition schemes and a resolution of 1.5 mm, these techniques are suitable to be combined with routine clinical scans and provide improved characterization of the ChP in neurodegenerative diseases.

4.1. Separating Tissue, Blood, and CSF in the ChP

To determine the contributions of CSF, blood, and tissue water in each IVIM component, we utilized relaxation modulations, similar to spectral editing in nuclear magnetic resonance by selecting certain types of signals based on its relaxation properties. Previously, Jerome et al. [32] have proposed an extended T2‐IVIM model to account for the TE dependence of the IVIM signal and demonstrated that the estimated perfusion fraction is dependent on the echo time used for IVIM. This finding highlights that relaxation effects are intrinsically encoded in the IVIM signal, and these effects can be modulated. To optimize IVIM acquisition, we tailored the TI and TE to detect specific fluid compartments. By selecting an appropriate TI, we were able to suppress CSF (FLAIR‐IVIM) [33, 34] and blood (VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM) signals [26], whereas a long TE helped suppress tissue water (Figure 2e–g). This approach reduced the number of compartments under consideration and thereby allowed further examinations of the fluid compartments in the ChP. However, this approach only provides a partial view as IVIM reveals only relative volume fractions in diffusivity at given TI and TE, not their absolute volume fractions (Figures 3a–e and 4d–f), which are important for further quantification. Fully disentangling these components may require T1‐D and T2‐D correlation data from advanced methods such as multidimensional MRI (MD‐MRI) [35], which is time consuming due to the comprehensive sampling with multiple simultaneous relaxation and diffusion encodings and may not suit practical clinical use. Moreover, the blood signal suppression is based on the experimental value of blood T1; whether this approach can separate the arterial blood from venous blood, which has shorter T2, still needs future technical improvement.

4.2. Evidence Suggests an Interstitial Fluid Compartment in the ChP

FLAIR‐IVIM revealed a compartment in the ChP with diffusivities slightly lower than free water and T1 values different from CSF, likely representing ISF (Figure 4f). Wong et al. [30, 36] previously observed similar intermediate diffusion peaks in the basal ganglia, cortex, and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in elderly patients with small vessel disease. They attributed these peaks to ISF, which may have different protein concentrations compared to CSF, causing the difference in T1. It was estimated that the human brain contains approximately 150 mL of ISF [2], with the ChP likely holding a certain amount of ISF within its stromal tissue, derived from fenestrated blood vessels before being released into the ventricles as CSF. Anderson et al. [7] used a three‐water‐pool model for DCE‐MRI to assess water exchange in the ChP between the blood and interstitial space and CSF release from the interstitium into the ventricle. Our results suggested that the intermediate diffusion compartment observed in FLAIR‐IVIM represented ISF in the ChP based on two observations: (1) The diffusivity of this fluid compartment was lower than those of free CSF and blood (Table 2); (2) the fluid compartment exhibited a shorter T2 than CSF and a different T1 from CSF, as indicated by results from LongTE‐IVIM (Figure 4e) and FLAIR‐IVIM (Figure 4f), suggesting a more restricted or viscous diffusion environment within the ChP tissue compared to the ventricles. Based on Einstein's diffusion equation, the mean square distance of water molecule diffusion with the observed intermediate diffusivity and diffusion time of FLAIR‐IVIM is approximately 20 μm, comparable to the size of cell bodies, suggesting the spatial scale of restrictive barriers within the stromal tissue. However, validating the ISF compartment through histopathology is challenging, as fluid is typically removed during conventional histological processing.

4.3. FLAIR‐IVIM Brings Insights Into Age‐Related Changes in the ChP

Although the volume of the ChP generally increased with age (Figure 7c), information on age‐related changes in its internal structure and function is important to advance our knowledge on the effects of aging on ChP. Using FLAIR‐IVIM, we reported reduced microvascular flow in elderly subjects (Figure 7f–h). This reduction in vascular density in aging ChP has been observed in high‐resolution ferumoxytol‐enhanced SWI [10].

Furthermore, we observed a reduced intermediate diffusion fraction in the ChP in elderly subjects compared to young adults (Figure 7e), which could indicate either actual volume changes of the ISF or alterations in protein or plasma concentration that affect the T1 of the ISF. Nevertheless, it has been reported that the CSF production rate is reduced with age due to several structural alterations in the ChP. With increasing age, the capillary wall tends to get thicker, affecting the exchange between capillary blood water and interstitial fluid; as a result, the composition of ISF in ChP may be altered. Additionally, we observed reduced tissue ADC using FLAIR‐IVIM; the interstitial space of stromal tissue may undergo increased stromal sclerosis, calcification, and cyst formation. These changes could lead to a decrease in both tissue water diffusivity and fluid volume within the interstitial space of the ChP, thereby affecting CSF production efficiency in the elderly. However, other than diffusion, the interpretation of these results may be affected by the age‐related change in tissue or interstitial fluid relaxivity, as remaining spin fractions of tissue signal could also affect the normalized volume fraction of interstitial fluids.

FLAIR‐IVIM also helped to understand the cyst or cyst‐like structures in the ChP. Whereas conventional and FLAIR‐IVIM results showed reduced diffusivities in the cysts compared to normal ChP, FLAIR‐IVIM further suggested altered relaxivity in the cysts (Figure 8a,b), hinting at a more restrictive physical environment and further changes in the chemical environment, respectively. Using oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE)–diffusion MRI, Maekawa et al. [37] have found that ChP cysts demonstrated restrictive diffusion at shorter diffusion times, indicating that cyst fluids are spatially restricted or highly viscous due to higher protein levels [38, 39]. These observations have demonstrated the complexity of the physical and physiochemical environment of the ChP cyst.

4.4. Evidence of Potential CSF/ISF Flow in the ChP From VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM

Given the CSF production process in the ChP, IVIM could potentially detect CSF or ISF movement within the ChP. Recent reports have shown that diffusion MRI with low diffusion weightings may be sensitive to CSF flow. For example, Harrison et al. [40] reported the use of long echo times and low diffusion weightings to detect perivascular fluid flow near the rat middle cerebral artery. Wen et al. and Wright et al. [41, 42] used a low b‐value of 150 s/mm2 to measure slower CSF flow with suppression of fast nearby blood flow. Because the surface of ChP is highly folded, the CSF/ISF flow may appear incoherent and fall in the IVIM regime, which may provide complementary insights to ChP functions. VASO‐LongTE‐IVIM aims to null the signal from both blood and tissue components before IVIM readout, with the residual pseudo‐diffusion component theoretically coming from the CSF/ISF flow (Figure 6b,e). However, these findings need further validation. One alternative explanation is that the VASO inversion pulses are calculated based on a single T1,blood at 3 T, making it difficult to confirm that the blood signal is 100% suppressed. Therefore, the fast diffusion components we see may still contain signals from unsuppressed blood. Furthermore, the CSF pulsation within the ventricle or arterial pulsation may affect the measurement in the ChP. The IVIM components have potential contributions from the outcome of incoherent ventricular CSF bulk flow near the ChP. However, it is challenging to assess the effects of bulk CSF flow using the current multiple b‐values approach. Combining the IVIM approach with cardiac‐gated diffusion MRI methods or velocity‐encoding techniques would allow us to better understand the effects of pulsatile‐related CSF motion.

4.5. Technical Considerations and Limitations

For FLAIR‐IVIM and VASO‐IVIM, an important factor that may affect the image acquisition is the B1 inhomogeneities. Our water phantom result showed that the inversion efficiency is between 97 and 100% across the field of view. In our study, we assumed uniform inversion efficiency in the ChP to estimate T1 distributions. However, as noted by Avram et al. [35], other dynamic processes, such as magnetization transfer, can impact short T1 components in inversion recovery experiments [43]. Their impact on ChP tissue needs further investigation. In addition, DTI results (Figure S5a,b) demonstrated the isotropic microstructural organization in the ChP, supporting the feasibility of our FLAIR‐IVIM protocol with only one diffusion direction. For spectral analysis of anisotropic tissue, additional diffusion encoding directions will likely improve IVIM results but prolong acquisition times. Moreover, in the lateral ventricles, flow void artifacts increase with b‐values. Using flow‐compensated techniques in the future could help mitigate these artifacts. Lastly, this study did not account for the exchange between different fluid compartments. Because water exchange across tissue compartments is common and crucial for the BCSFB function, future IVIM experiments with varying diffusion times could provide better insights into fluid compartment interactions in the ChP.

5. Conclusion

In summary, we developed relaxation‐selective IVIM acquisitions to assess the structure and function of the ChP by targeting specific fluid compartments. Beyond the CSF, blood, and tissue compartments identified with conventional IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM results revealed an additional ISF compartment within the ChP. In elderly subjects, relaxation‐selective IVIM demonstrated reduced microvascular flow, a diminished ISF compartment, and lower tissue ADC values compared to younger adults. This technique has the potential to elucidate age‐related changes in ChP function and neurofluid dynamics in the brain.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: C.L., Z.S., J.Z., and Y.G. Data acquisition and analysis: C.L., Z.S. Data analysis and interpretation: C.L., Z.S., J.Z., and Y.G. Supervision and funding acquisition: J.Z. and Y.G. C.L. wrote the initial manuscript, and all authors contribute to the writing and final approval of the manuscript before submission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Figure S1: Pulse sequences of T1 and T2 relaxation selective diffusion MRI acquisition. (a) 180 inversion pulse were applied before the IVIM encoding, adjusted inversion time (TI) was applied for T1‐selective IVIM. (b) T2 selective IVIM was achieved by adjusting the echo time (TE) for T2‐weighting.

Figure S2: Representative images of (a) multiple echo time for T2 relaxation distribution and (b) multiple inversion time for T1 relaxation distribution.

Figure S3: (a) Multiple inversion time on a doped‐water phantom from 0 to 500 ms due to short T1 of doped water compared to pure water. (b) Phase‐corrected inversion recovery data prepared for ILT analysis. (c) ILT result of water phantom revealed doped water T1 of 91 ms. (d) Fitted T1 inversion recovery data and (e) voxel wise inversion efficiency map (η).

Figure S4: Analytical simulation on (a) T2 signal decay and (b) T1 signal recovery in parenchymal tissue, CSF, and blood showing spin populations at certain inversion times and echo times.

Figure S5: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) analysis of choroid plexus tissue (N = 5). Quantitative diffusion maps including mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity (ad), and fractional anisotropy (FA) were shown in the area of choroid plexus. The choroid plexus exhibits low FA (0.11 ± 0.03), indicating predominantly isotropic diffusion, consistent with its structural characteristics.

Figure S6: Representative denoised b0 images, noise maps and residuals from MP‐PCA denoising in IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM and LongTE‐IVIM data.

NBM-38-e70144-s001.docx (4.6MB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank our MRI technicians and research coordination teams for their efforts in preparing the MRI examinations and recruiting volunteers for this study. The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr. Eric E. Sigmund for his thoughtful input and discussion on this study.

Li C., Sun Z., Zhang J., and Ge Y., “Relaxation‐Selective Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging of Microvascular Perfusion and Fluid Compartments in the Human Choroid Plexus,” NMR in Biomedicine 38, no. 10 (2025): e70144, 10.1002/nbm.70144.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (RF1 NS11041, R01 NS108491, U24 NS135568, R01 AG077422, R13 AG067684, and P30 AG066512).

Contributor Information

Chenyang Li, Email: chenyang.li@nyulangone.org.

Yulin Ge, Email: yulin.ge@nyulangone.org.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Sakka L., Coll G., and Chazal J., “Anatomy and Physiology of Cerebrospinal Fluid,” European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases 128, no. 6 (2011): 309–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Damkier H. H., Brown P. D., and Praetorius J., “Cerebrospinal Fluid Secretion by the Choroid Plexus,” Physiological Reviews 93, no. 4 (2013): 1847–1892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. MacAulay N., Keep R. F., and Zeuthen T., “Cerebrospinal Fluid Production by the Choroid Plexus: A Century of Barrier Research Revisited,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 19, no. 1 (2022): 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tijms B. M., Vromen E. M., Mjaavatten O., et al., “Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteomics in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Reveals Five Molecular Subtypes With Distinct Genetic Risk Profiles,” Nature Aging 4, no. 1 (2024): 33–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Carna M., Onyango I. G., Katina S., et al., “Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease: Involvement of the Choroid Plexus,” Alzheimer's & Dementia 19, no. 8 (2023): 3537–3554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Alisch J. S. R., Kiely M., Triebswetter C., et al., “Characterization of Age‐Related Differences in the Human Choroid Plexus Volume, Microstructural Integrity, and Blood Perfusion Using Multiparameter Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 13 (2021): 734992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Anderson V. C., Tagge I. J., Doud A., et al., “DCE‐MRI of Brain Fluid Barriers: In Vivo Water Cycling at the Human Choroid Plexus,” Tissue Barriers 10, no. 1 (2022): 1963143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Choi J. D., Moon Y., Kim H. J., Yim Y., Lee S., and Moon W. J., “Choroid Plexus Volume and Permeability at Brain MRI Within the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum,” Radiology 304, no. 3 (2022): 635–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hubert V., Chauveau F., Dumot C., et al., “Clinical Imaging of Choroid Plexus in Health and in Brain Disorders: A Mini‐Review,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 12 (2019): 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sun Z., Li C., Muccio M., et al., “Vascular Aging in the Choroid Plexus: A 7T Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (USPIO)‐MRI Study,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 60 (2024): 2564–2575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhao L., Taso M., Dai W., Press D. Z., and Alsop D. C., “Non‐Invasive Measurement of Choroid Plexus Apparent Blood Flow With Arterial Spin Labeling,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 17, no. 1 (2020): 58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sun Z., Li C., Zhang J., Wisniewski T., and Ge Y., “Choroid Plexus Aging: Structural and Vascular Insights From the HCP‐Aging Dataset,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 21, no. 1 (2024): 98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lee H., Ozturk B., Stringer M. S., et al., “Choroid Plexus Tissue Perfusion and Blood to CSF Barrier Function in Rats Measured With Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling,” NeuroImage 261 (2022): 119512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Petitclerc L., Hirschler L., Orzsik B., Asllani I., and van Osch M. J. P., “Arterial Spin Labeling Signal in the CSF: Implications for Partial Volume Correction and Blood‐CSF Barrier Characterization,” NMR in Biomedicine 36, no. 3 (2023): e4852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Evans P. G., Sokolska M., Alves A., et al., “Non‐Invasive MRI of Blood‐Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier Function,” Nature Communications 11, no. 1 (2020): 2081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Petitclerc L., Hirschler L., Wells J. A., et al., “Ultra‐Long‐TE Arterial Spin Labeling Reveals Rapid and Brain‐Wide Blood‐to‐CSF Water Transport in Humans,” NeuroImage 245 (2021): 118755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Le Bihan D., Breton E., Lallemand D., Aubin M. L., Vignaud J., and Laval‐Jeantet M., “Separation of Diffusion and Perfusion in Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging,” Radiology 168, no. 2 (1988): 497–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Le Bihan D., “What Can We See With IVIM MRI?,” NeuroImage 187 (2019): 56–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Iima M. and Le Bihan D., “Clinical Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion MR Imaging: Past, Present, and Future,” Radiology 278, no. 1 (2016): 13–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chow A. M., Gao D. S., Fan S. J., et al., “Liver Fibrosis: An Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Study,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 36, no. 1 (2012): 159–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chandarana H., Kang S. K., Wong S., et al., “Diffusion‐Weighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging of Renal Tumors With Histopathologic Correlation,” Investigative Radiology 47, no. 12 (2012): 688–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Federau C., Meuli R., O'Brien K., Maeder P., and Hagmann P., “Perfusion Measurement in Brain Gliomas With Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI,” AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 35, no. 2 (2014): 256–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Rane Levendovszky S., Flores J., Peskind E. R., Vaclavu L., van Osch M. J., and Iliff J., “Preliminary Investigations Into Human Neurofluid Transport Using Multiple Novel Non‐Contrast MRI Methods,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 44, no. 12 (2024): 271678X241264407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Venkataramanan L., Yi‐Qiao S., and Hurlimann M. D., “Solving Fredholm Integrals of the First Kind With Tensor Product Structure in 2 and 2.5 Dimensions,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 50, no. 5 (2002): 1017–1026. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tadayon E., Moret B., Sprugnoli G., et al., “Improving Choroid Plexus Segmentation in the Healthy and Diseased Brain: Relevance for Tau‐PET Imaging in Dementia,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 74, no. 4 (2020): 1057–1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lu H., Golay X., Pekar J. J., and Van Zijl P. C., “Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Changes in Vascular Space Occupancy,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 50, no. 2 (2003): 263–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lu H. and van Zijl P. C., “A Review of the Development of Vascular‐Space‐Occupancy (VASO) fMRI,” NeuroImage 62, no. 2 (2012): 736–742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lu H., Clingman C., Golay X., and van Zijl P. C., “Determining the Longitudinal Relaxation Time (T1) of Blood at 3.0 Tesla,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52, no. 3 (2004): 679–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Li W., Grgac K., Huang A., Yadav N., Qin Q., and van Zijl P. C., “Quantitative Theory for the Longitudinal Relaxation Time of Blood Water,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 76, no. 1 (2016): 270–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wong S. M., Backes W. H., Drenthen G. S., et al., “Spectral Diffusion Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 51, no. 4 (2020): 1170–1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Paschoal A. M., Leoni R. F., Dos Santos A. C., and Paiva F. F., “Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI in Neurological and Cerebrovascular Diseases,” NeuroImage: Clinical 20 (2018): 705–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jerome N. P., d'Arcy J. A., Feiweier T., et al., “Extended T2‐IVIM Model for Correction of TE Dependence of Pseudo‐Diffusion Volume Fraction in Clinical Diffusion‐Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology 61, no. 24 (2016): N667–N680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Li H., Zu T., Hsu Y. C., et al., “Inversion‐Recovery‐Prepared Oscillating Gradient Sequence Improves Diffusion‐Time Dependency Measurements in the Human Brain,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 57, no. 2 (2023): 446–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kwong K. K., McKinstry R. C., Chien D., Crawley A. P., Pearlman J. D., and Rosen B. R., “CSF‐Suppressed Quantitative Single‐Shot Diffusion Imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 21, no. 1 (1991): 157–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Avram A. V., Sarlls J. E., and Basser P. J., “Whole‐Brain Imaging of Subvoxel T1‐Diffusion Correlation Spectra in Human Subjects,” Frontiers in Neuroscience 15 (2021): 671465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wong S. M., Zhang C. E., van Bussel F. C., et al., “Simultaneous Investigation of Microvasculature and Parenchyma in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging,” NeuroImage: Clinical 14 (2017): 216–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Maekawa T., Hori M., Murata K., et al., “Choroid Plexus Cysts Analyzed Using Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging With Short Diffusion‐Time,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 57 (2019): 323–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Czervionke L. F., Daniels D. L., Meyer G. A., Pojunas K. W., Williams A. L., and Haughton V. M., “Neuroepithelial Cysts of the Lateral Ventricles: MR Appearance,” AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 8, no. 4 (1987): 609–613. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Odake G., Tenjin H., and Murakami N., “Cyst of the Choroid Plexus in the Lateral Ventricle: Case Report and Review of the Literature,” Neurosurgery 27, no. 3 (1990): 470–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Harrison I. F., Siow B., Akilo A. B., et al., “Non‐Invasive Imaging of CSF‐Mediated Brain Clearance Pathways via Assessment of Perivascular Fluid Movement With Diffusion Tensor MRI,” eLife 7 (2018): 1025–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wen Q., Tong Y., Zhou X., Dzemidzic M., Ho C. Y., and Wu Y. C., “Assessing Pulsatile Waveforms of Paravascular Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics Within the Glymphatic Pathways Using Dynamic Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging (dDWI),” NeuroImage 260 (2022): 119464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Wright A. M., Wu Y. C., Feng L., and Wen Q., “Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics: Current Techniques and Future Advancements,” NMR in Biomedicine 37, no. 9 (2024): e5162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Labadie C., Lee J. H., Vetek G., and C. S. Springer, Jr. , “Relaxographic Imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance. Series B 105, no. 2 (1994): 99–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: Pulse sequences of T1 and T2 relaxation selective diffusion MRI acquisition. (a) 180 inversion pulse were applied before the IVIM encoding, adjusted inversion time (TI) was applied for T1‐selective IVIM. (b) T2 selective IVIM was achieved by adjusting the echo time (TE) for T2‐weighting.

Figure S2: Representative images of (a) multiple echo time for T2 relaxation distribution and (b) multiple inversion time for T1 relaxation distribution.

Figure S3: (a) Multiple inversion time on a doped‐water phantom from 0 to 500 ms due to short T1 of doped water compared to pure water. (b) Phase‐corrected inversion recovery data prepared for ILT analysis. (c) ILT result of water phantom revealed doped water T1 of 91 ms. (d) Fitted T1 inversion recovery data and (e) voxel wise inversion efficiency map (η).

Figure S4: Analytical simulation on (a) T2 signal decay and (b) T1 signal recovery in parenchymal tissue, CSF, and blood showing spin populations at certain inversion times and echo times.

Figure S5: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) analysis of choroid plexus tissue (N = 5). Quantitative diffusion maps including mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity (ad), and fractional anisotropy (FA) were shown in the area of choroid plexus. The choroid plexus exhibits low FA (0.11 ± 0.03), indicating predominantly isotropic diffusion, consistent with its structural characteristics.

Figure S6: Representative denoised b0 images, noise maps and residuals from MP‐PCA denoising in IVIM, FLAIR‐IVIM and LongTE‐IVIM data.

NBM-38-e70144-s001.docx (4.6MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Nmr in Biomedicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES