Abstract
Introduction
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is diagnosed based on a positive shunt response. However, up to 40% of patients who undergo ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting fail to exhibit sustained improvement. The management of iNPH remains challenging, particularly for non-responders who deteriorate despite surgery. We aimed to determine what features differentiate between long term versus short term responders and do valve adjustments affect their outcome?
Material and methods
We included patients that underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery for iNPH between December 2006 and December 2016. Patients were stratified as early (< 6 months) and late (> 6 months) non-responders, and responders. Descriptive statistics, time series plotting, chi-squared tests, and ANOVA analyses were used.
Results
Our cohort of 65 iNPH patients exhibited a mean follow-up of 3.75 years and consisted of 53.8% early non-responders, 15.4% late non-responders, and 30.8% responders. Comorbidities were distributed across all groups but did not significantly differentiate between response categories. A considerable subset experienced symptom deterioration after the six months mark. Shunt valve adjustments were more frequent in non-responders but did not prevent continued deterioration. In late non-responders, valve adjustments merely slowed symptom progression, without halting deterioration.
Conclusion
Our study underscores that valve pressure adjustments in early non-responders, who likely never benefit from shunt surgery, are not effective, and highlights the emergence of a late non-responder phenotype, where symptom deterioration becomes evident 6 months post-shunting. Our findings outline the need to explore alternative treatment strategies for managing symptoms in iNPH non-responders, as well as prolonged follow-up regimens to monitor late non-responders.
Keywords: NPH, Shunt-response, Non-responders, Shunt-adjustment
Introduction
Early diagnosis and optimized treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), has become increasingly important with its disproportionately increased prevalence in the elderly population [1, 13]. The prevailing gold standard to achieve this continues to be ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting, a surgical intervention involving the diversion of cerebrospinal fluid [11]. However, the heterogenous response to VP shunting means predicting shunt response and selecting surgical candidates correctly remains a clinical challenge.
Recent meta-analyses by Thavarajasingam et al. [26–28] have identified clinical, biochemical and radiological predictors of shunt response [26, 28]. These findings highlight the potential utility of intraparenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, callosal angle assessment, and periventricular changes as predictive factors for shunt response, alongside neurological assessment including detailed cognitive assessment and gait analyses. However, primary evidence beyond the usual 12-months follow-up mark on long term shunt responsiveness remains sparse.
Some literature, albeit minimal, exploring long term follow-up has suggested secondary deterioration many years after shunting, in patients who were initially shunt responsive, giving rise to the phenomenon of delayed shunt non-responders (S-NR). In a retrospective study conducted by Pujari et al., it was noted that a substantial proportion of patients experienced secondary deterioration approximately 2.7 years post VP shunt insertion, leading to the need for pressure level management or shunt revisions [24]. Additionally, a majority of patients monitored for at least three years in a comparable study by Gutowski et al. needed shunt revisions [10].
Predictors of late shunt non-responders (S-NR) remain insufficiently explored. Given the patient burden and the risks associated poorly managed iNPH, a comprehensive insight into the prognostic indicators of delayed S-NR is needed [19, 23]. This study focuses on the emergence of a distinct late non-responder phenotype, in which symptom deterioration occurs primarily after the six-month mark.
Methods
This retrospective single centre cohort study was conducted using electronic patient records from December 2006 to December 2016. It aimed to evaluate the shunt response of all patients of a large tertiary care neurosurgical center, that underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VP), with extended follow-up.
Selection of patients
Internationally recognised guidelines were used to select patients requiring VP shunting [22]. Any patient with one of Hakim’s triad underwent cranial imaging (CT or MRI), patients with recognised features of NPH such as Evan’s Index > 0.3, calossal angle between 40–90 degrees etc.11 were selected to undergo a CSF Tap test; on average, 38mL ± 13.4mL of CSF was drained. Subsequently all patients underwent a battery of assessments both pre and post tap test including Romberg standing test, the Unterberger stepping test, the rope walking test and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, orientation to time, place and person, the Mini-Mental Status Test and the DemTect Test. Patients who improved in the mobility tests post CSF tap underwent VP shunting. Improvement was assessed one hour after tap test and defined as subjective improvement in gait tests or faster TUG time and improvement of greater or equal to one point in MMSE. Drainage systems from Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co and Integra LifeSciences, the manufacturers of the Codman Hakim valve, were used. Patients then underwent cranial imaging (CT vs MRI) post operatively.
Data collection
Data collection, completed by 2022, involved storing and analyzing anonymized patient information. Ethical approval was obtained from the hospital’s ethics board and head of department, inline with local protocol.
Patients were followed up at 6–12 month intervals after surgery following their initial 3 month follow-up. Patients with no follow-up after 3 months were excluded from this study. At each follow-up period the following was recorded: days between surgery and follow-up, complications since last follow-up including; hospitalisation, alternative NPH diagnosis made, cerebral infarction, fall with cranial bleed. Additionally, assessment of improvements of Hakims triad symptoms were rated as + 1 (improved), 0 (same), −1(worsened) and were recorded, this was in relation to their previous appointment, not surgery.
Any valve pressure changes and subsequent improvement of symptoms and cranial imaging findings were noted. Shunt patency was tested by checking if the shunt pump was still “pumpable”. We then checked for shunt dislocation or disconnection by using CT head with 3D reconstruction as well as AP and lateral X-rays of the skull neck thorax and abdomen. Complications revealed by cranial imaging, e.g. signs of over-drainage, under-drainage hygroma, haemorrhage and any intervention required were also recorded.
Statistical analysis
Calculations were performed using R (version 4.0.4), with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Exploratory data analysis and time-series analyses was conducted to examine the data's underlying structure and patterns. We used a mathematical t1/2 framework to categorize iNPH patients post-surgery into distinct responder types, informed by temporal symptom change patterns. Our methodology entailed the calculation of the final cumulative symptom change. Each scoring of the patients of their clinical status as described above, was scored as + 1 for “improved”, 0 for “same” and −1 for “worse”. The cumulative symptom status was the sum of these scores after all follow-ups of the respective patients. This was followed by the identification of the time point at which each patient experienced a 50% decline in symptoms. Utilizing these metrics, we assigned patients to one of three categories: "Responder", "Early Non-Responder (< 6 months)", or "Late Non-Responder (> 6 months)". The proportional representation of non-responders at each time point was then calculated to provide a comprehensive understanding of the treatment outcomes over time. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used to evaluate differences in the chosen covariates between three response groups, namely: responders, early non-responders (< 6 months) and late non-responders (> 6 months).
Results
A cohort of 65 patients who underwent VP shunting was observed, with a mean follow-up duration of 3.75 years. Eight patients were excluded as they did not attend 3 month follow-up for unknown reasons, however they did not sustain complications.
Temporal analysis
Figure 1 illustrates the range of patient symptom trajectories following ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery for iNPH. The graph tracks cumulative symptom changes over time, with individual patient paths delineated. The analysis identifies a pattern where a subset of patients, categorized as early non-responders, represented by the red lines, exhibit a lack of symptom improvement shortly after surgery. Conversely, a distinct group emerges, labeled as late non-responders (blue lines), where symptom decline becomes more pronounced after the initial six-month period, pointing to a delayed onset of symptom deterioration. The responders, indicated by green lines, generally maintain or improve their symptomatology over the observed timeline.
Fig. 1.
Longitudinal patient-level symptom change post-ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. The lines are grouped into response groups: early non-responder (< 6 months), late non-responder (> 6 months), responder. A black triangle indicates that at the respective time point, the shunt pressure valve was adjusted at the follow-up appointment
Following this analysis patients were categorized into three response groups; early non-responders (within the first 6 months) who comprised 53.8% of the cohort. Late non-responders (occurring between 6 months to 3 years), constituted 15.4% of the patient group. Responders to the treatment represented 30.8% of the total sample. Detailed patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and disease-specific attributes across these response categories are compiled in Table 1.
Table 1.
Summary of clinical and disease characteristics across response categories in our patient cohort. Figure 1 depicts the cumulative symptom change over time for each patient following ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. Each line represents an individual patient's trajectory, with the x-axis indicating the number of days since surgery and the y-axis representing the cumulative change in symptoms. The symptom change is calculated by summing the directional changes in symptoms, with improvements, no change, and deteriorations weighted as + 1, 0, and −1, respectively
| Group | Early Non-responder (< 6 month) | Late Non-responder (> 6 months) | Responder |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count (% of overall sample) | 35 (53.8%) | 10 (15.4%) | 20 (30.8%) |
| Comorbidities | |||
| CVS risk | 97 | 100 | 95 |
| Polyneuropathy | 9 | 20 | 25 |
| Dementia | 94 | 100 | 85 |
| Other cause of incontinence | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| Epilepsy | 3 | 10 | 0 |
| Metabolic disease | 43 | 50 | 55 |
| Dementia | 14 | 20 | 5 |
| Malignancy | 14 | 20 | 10 |
| Psychiatric illness | 20 | 0 | 10 |
| Prostate disease | 17 | 30 | 15 |
| Stroke | 17 | 20 | 10 |
| Gait impairment | |||
| Broad-based gait | 26 | 30 | 30 |
| Small steps | 74 | 90 | 75 |
| Tendency to fall | 11 | 10 | 5 |
| Unsteady walking | 54 | 30 | 45 |
| Directional unsteadiness | 11 | 0 | 5 |
| Increased turning steps | 17 | 30 | 10 |
| Mobility aid | 0 | 10 | 15 |
| Romberg test positive | 17 | 30 | 10 |
| Urinary incontinence & miscellaneous | |||
| Headache | 9 | 20 | 5 |
| Urinary Incontinence | 89 | 100 | 80 |
| Speech impairment | 17 | 10 | 5 |
| Psychomotor slowing | 23 | 10 | 20 |
| Behavioural issues | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Cranial nerve deficit | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Cognition | |||
| Time disorientated | 29 | 20 | 0 |
| Globally disorientated | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Reduced MMSE | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Short term memory impaired | 9 | 10 | 5 |
| Situationally disorientated | 17 | 10 | 0 |
| Spatially disorientated | 0 | 20 | 5 |
| Abnormal Demtect | 29 | 20 | 0 |
| Radiological findings | |||
| Expanded external CSF spaces | 17 | 20 | 10 |
| Expanded internal CSF spaces | 66 | 80 | 85 |
| Global brain atropy | 14 | 0 | 10 |
| Shunt | |||
| Abdominal catheter downright | 74 | 70 | 85 |
| Hakim Medos | 37 | 70 | 35 |
| ProGav Miethke | 63 | 30 | 65 |
| Shunt Assistant | 54 | 20 | 70 |
| Post-LP improvement | |||
| Walking improved slightly post-LP | 6 | 20 | 10 |
| Walking improved clearly post-LP | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Improvement in MMSE Post-LP | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Improvement in DemTect Post-LP | 3 | 10 | 0 |
| Continuous variables | |||
| Age at surgery (SD) | 73.6 (6.8) | 77.2 (4.8) | 71.3 (7.2) |
| Symptom duration before presentation in days (SD) | 16.2 (15.9) | 13.5 (11.8) | 20.1 (22.9) |
| Duration between initial presentation and surgery in days (SD) | 96.6 (326.1) | 38.2 (59.2) | 47.4 (82.3) |
| Shunt pressure level in mmH2O (SD) | 93.4 (23.4) | 107 (22.1) | 99.5 (23.1) |
Table 1 presents a detailed breakdown of clinical characteristics and their prevalence across five defined response categories in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. The groups include early non-responders (within 6 months, late non responders > 6 months responders, and responders. The count and percentage of the overall sample for response category are provided, the rest of the covariates are depicted as percentages offering a snapshot of the distribution within the cohort. Continuous covariates are presented as mean values with SD in brackets () at the bottom
Patient characteristics & comorbidities
An analysis of age at surgery reveals that early non-responders (mean age: 73.6 years, SD: 6.8) were, on average, younger than late non-responders (mean age: 77.2 years, SD: 4.8). The mean age of responders was 71.3 years (SD: 7.2). A visual representation is shown in Fig. 2A where a discernible trend suggests that early responders tend to be younger compared to their non-responding counterparts. The age distribution among late non-responders exhibits a skew towards older individuals, implying a potential age-related gradient in response to surgery. However, ANOVA analysis of age seen in Table 2 does not show any significance between the three groups.
Fig. 2.
Comparative analysis of continuous covariates by response category post-ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. Figure 2 depicts a panel consisting of four sub-figures 2 A-D, each respectively labelled alphabetically. Figure 2A presents patient age at the time of surgery in years. The distribution of ages is shown by the breadth of the violins, with wider areas indicating a higher density of patients. Figure 2B depicts the shunt pressure level measured in mmH2O. The varied widths of the violin plots reflect the frequency of pressure levels observed among the patients. Figure 2C displays the time interval between initial presentation and surgery in days. The shape of each violin plot suggests the variability in waiting times before surgery. Figure 2D illustrates the distribution of symptom duration prior to surgery across different response categories. Violin plots represent the spread and density of symptom duration in months. Each colour corresponds to a specific response group (early non-responder (< 6 months), late non-responder (> 6 months), responder). The boxplot within each violin shows the median and interquartile range, providing a summary statistic of central tendency and dispersion
Table 2.
ANOVA results assessing statistical significance for difference of continuous variables between shunt responders, early non-responders and late non-responders
| p-value | |
|---|---|
| Age at surgery | 0.13 |
| Shunt pressure level (mmH2O) | 0.49 |
| Time between presentation and surgery | 0.60 |
| Symptom Duration | 0.65 |
Table 2 delineates the ANOVA results for continuous variables analyzed against the response categories of iNPH patients post-ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. These categories range from early non-responders (within 6 months) to late non-responders (> 6 moths) and responders
Comorbidities were broadly distributed across the response categories, with cardiovascular risk factors present in 97% of early non-responders, 100% of late non-responders, and 95% of responders. Dementia prevalence was notably high in all late non-responders (100%) and less so in responders (85%). Neither cardiovascular risk factors, psychiatric history or dementia showed a significant association with the surgical response in this analysis. 3B visually displays metabolic diseases are more frequently observed in late non-responders compared to early non-responders.
The Chi-Squared test results depicted in Table 3 demonstrates the associations between various categorical variables and the response categories of iNPH patients post ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, of which only time disorientation was significantly different between the three groups.
Table 3.
Chi-Squared test results assessing statistical significance for difference of categorical variables between shunt responders, early non-responders and late non-responders
| Chi-Squared Test Results for Categorical Variables | |
|---|---|
| Variable | p-value |
| Symptoms and co-morbidities | |
| Presence of Urinary incontinence | 0.34 |
| Presence of Dementia | 0.25 |
| Presence of Headache | 0.65 |
| Presence of Cardiovascular risk factors | 0.71 |
| Presence of Stroke | 0.66 |
| Presence of Previous dementia | 0.35 |
| Presence of Epilepsy | 0.50 |
| Presence of Previous psychiatric illness | 0.82 |
| Presence of Prostate disease | 0.54 |
| Presence of Diseases causing incontinence | 0.96 |
| Presence of Metabolic diseases | 0.38 |
| Presence of Comorbidities polyneuropathy | 0.33 |
| Presence of Previous malignant disease | 0.62 |
| Gait analysis | |
| Walking test: Presence of Small steps | 0.26 |
| Walking test: Presence of Mobility aid | 0.36 |
| Walking test: Partial Improvement post LP | 0.15 |
| Walking test: Substantive improvement post LP | 0.49 |
| Walking test: Presence of Unsteady gait | 0.18 |
| Walking test: Presence of Tendency to fall | 0.61 |
| Walking test: Presence of Broad based gait | 0.94 |
| Walking test: Presence of Increased turning steps | 0.28 |
| Walking test: Romberg positive | 0.09 |
| Walking test: Presence of Directional unsteadiness | 0.71 |
| Neuropsychological analysis | |
| Neuropsychological testing: Person disorientated | 0.37 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Spatially disorientated | 0.17 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Time disorientated | 0.04* |
| Neuropsychological testing: Situation disorientated | 0.83 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Short term memory issue | 0.32 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Presence of Behavioural issue | 0.71 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Presence of Speech issues | 0.25 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Presence of Cognitive impairment | 0.63 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Reduced MMSE | 0.34 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Improvement in MMSE Post LP | 0.32 |
| Neuropsychological testing: No Improvement in MMSE Post LP | 0.50 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Abnormal Demtect | 0.11 |
| Neuropsychological testing: No Improvement in Demtect Post LP | 0.36 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Intact Cranial nerves | 0.54 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Abnormal Cranial nerves | 0.10 |
| Neuropsychological testing: Presence of Psychomotor slowing | 0.35 |
| Shunt type | |
| Shunt Manufacturer: Hakim Medos | 0.15 |
| Shunt Manufacturer ProGav Miethke | 0.15 |
| Use of Shunt assistant | 0.06 |
| Radiology | |
| CT/MRI: Presence of Expanded internal CSF spaces | 0.24 |
| CT/MRI: Presence of Expanded external CSF spaces | 0.66 |
| CT/MRI: Presence of Global brain atrophy | 0.27 |
Table 3 delineates the Chi-Squared test results for categorical variables analyzed against the response categories of iNPH patients post-ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. The asterisk (*) denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05)
The ANOVA analysis outlined in Table 2 showed there was no statistical significance in the interval between initial presentation and surgery, and the duration of symptoms between the response groups. Figures 3C and 3D explore the time intervals between presentation and surgery, and the duration of symptoms prior to surgery, respectively. Figure 3F indicates no significant differences in post-lumbar puncture symptom improvements across all groups, highlighting that this intervention does not discriminate based on response category, i.e. the type to degree of lumbar puncture response does not indicate overall improvement post surgery. Overall, there were no significant differences in co-morbidities or characteristics between the three groups other than time disorientation.
Fig. 3.
Heatmap analysis of categorical covariates by response category post-ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. Figure 3 depicts a panel consisting of six sub-figures 2 A-F, each respectively labelled alphabetically. Figure 3 provides a comparative visualization of various clinical factors associated with patient outcomes in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) across different response categories (early non-responder (< 6 months), late non-responder (> 6 months), responder) to shunt surgery. The color gradient represents the proportion of patients within each category, with darker shades indicating a higher prevalence. Across all heatmaps, the x-axis represents the response categories ranging from early non-responders to late non-responders, including those who responded positively to treatment. Figure 3A examines postoperative improvement and other iNPH-related factors. Figure 3B showcases a range of comorbidities. Figure 3C focuses on various aspects of gait and mobility. Figure 3D highlights neuropsychological features. Figure 3E reflects imaging-related findings. Figure 3F highlights improvement of urinary incontinence, headache, gait and dementia after patients received a Lumbar Puncture between the three groups
Hakim triad
The distribution of gait impairments also showed variability among response categories, with broad-based gait observed in 26% of early non-responders, 30% of late non-responders, and 30% of responders. Figure 3C reveals that an unsteady gait is more common in early non-responders than late non-responders. Cognitive challenges, such as time disorientation, were documented in 29% of responders but were absent in late non-responders, this was a significant difference at p = 0.037.
Contrary to initial expectations, variables such as urinary incontinence and dementia, which are clinically significant in iNPH, did not demonstrate a statistically significant variance (p = 0.34434095 and p = 0.25435641 respectively), indicating a uniform prevalence across the three response groups. Figure 3D emphasizes neuropsychological factors, with speech issues being more pronounced in both early and late non-responders. Interestingly, the incidence of abnormal Demtect, a measure of cognitive function, is significantly higher in late non-responders.
Radiological markers & shunt choice
Radiological findings indicated that internal CSF spaces were expanded in 66% of early non-responders, 70% of late non-responders, and 85% of responders, however there was no statistical significant difference, this is demonstrated in in Fig. 3E.
The choice of shunt device varied among the groups, with Hakim Medos devices being used in 37% of early non-responders, 70% of late non-responders, and 35% of responders, this did not affect outcome statistically. Figure 3A highlights the prevalence of shunt types and postoperative improvement. Notably, there's a higher usage of Hakim Medos shunts in late non-responders. Conversely, early non-responders and responders exhibit a more varied distribution of shunt types.
Shunt valve changes
There was no significant difference in initial shunt pressure level between the three groups (Table 2), the mean initial shunt pressures (mmH20) were 93.4 in early non-responders, 107 in late non-responders and 99.5 in responders.
Overall, there were 131 pressure changes (31%), however only 17 (13%) adjusted were superseded by improvement. In early non-responders, there is a high number of valve adjustments, suggesting frequent postoperative interventions aimed at optimizing shunt function shortly after surgery. Late non-responders also show a significant number of valve changes, which may reflect later adjustments due to evolving symptoms or delayed identification of suboptimal shunt performance. Among responders, valve changes are observed in approximately half of the patients, indicating that shunt adjustments occurred even in those with a generally positive clinical outcome.
Complications
There were 431 follow-ups appointments in total, over the entire follow-up period, there were 53 follow-up appointments where complications were identified, a complication rate of 12.2%. Thirty-nine of these were over-drainage, 2 were under-drainage; 25 hygromas were identified, 17 subdural haematomas, 8 underwent shunt revision.
Discussion
Our result of 46.2% sustained improvement at 6 months fits within the established, albeit lower side, of published early shunt response literature in NPH [6, 19, 25]. The long term shunt non-response (early and late) fits well within established literature, Vanneste et al. found sustained response at 5 years only in 21% of patients, Savolainen et al. found 21–40% at 5 years, likewise Kahlon et al. 10–40% and Gencer et al. 35–80% at 3 years [9, 14, 25, 29]. The concept of long term failure in shunt response in NPH is not new, however causative factors of this phenomenon are not adequately explored. This paper aimed to delineate the transient shunt responder from the long-term shunt responder, and the distinguishing factors between them.
The categorization of shunt non-responders (S-NR) into early and late groups based on the onset of symptom deterioration post-surgery offers valuable insights into the temporal dynamics of the disease. Rather than viewing late and early non-responders as a uniform group, we observed that symptom trajectories in these patients follow varied patterns. Some patients demonstrate extended periods of stability postoperatively before experiencing sharp declines, while others exhibit consistent deterioration soon after surgery. This variability suggests that symptom progression is not a steady, linear process, but one that fluctuates, perhaps in response to underlying pathophysiological factors like cerebral ischemia or neurodegeneration [4].
Despite frequent valve adjustments in the two non-responsive groups, there was no discernible improvement, indicating it was not an issue with the procedure, rather with patient selection or surgical timing. Despite these repeated shunt valve adjustments, non-responders continue to deteriorate, with symptom deterioration at best slowed down in late non-responders, raising important questions about the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that may render both valve changes and, indeed, shunt surgery itself ineffective. Although existing literature demonstrates higher rates of shunt adjustment (1.68 mean per patient) than our study, there is no established causative link between overall number of adjustments and patient outcome [18]. Despite adequate follow-up and and adjustment where necessary, there were still a significant proportion of transient responders who began to deteriorate. It is also important to note this cohort’s complication rate aligned with existing literature, complications rates tend to range between 20–40% further adding validity to results [20, 21].
Patient selection was in-line with recognised protocols, relying on objective CSF tap-test improvement, however recent analysis show that CSF tap test alone to be weak predictor of response, [27] interestingly our paper has shown that type and degree of tap test improvement did not discriminate between the groups, suggesting symptomology maybe not be the best predictor of long-term response.
One potential explanation relates to the pathogenesis of iNPH, which involves chronic cerebral ischemia caused by impaired CSF dynamics. The imbalance between CSF production and reabsorption leads to ventricular enlargement and mechanical compression of the periventricular white matter, particularly the corticospinal tract and other critical motor pathways. This process, especially in its earlier stages, is believed to cause reversible ischemic damage, which may improve with prompt shunt placement and proper pressure adjustments [15].
However, in non-responders—particularly early non-responders—it is plausible that more advanced disease has led to irreversible neuronal damage and increased brain stiffness, especially in the deep white matter and frontal subcortical areas. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) studies provide strong evidence for this, showing that cerebrum brain stiffness tends to increase with disease progression in iNPH [7]. This stiffness, likely associated with chronic ischemia and tissue compression, may lead to irreversible damage to neuroanatomical structures responsible for symptom improvement, such as those regulating gait, cognition, and urinary continence. MRE represents a useful diagnostic tool, as studies have shown stiffness to trend downwards in healthy controls with age [2]. As a result, these patients may never have benefitted from shunt surgery at all, as their brain tissue was already too damaged to respond to reduced pressure [17]. This theory aligns with previous clinical studies demonstrating that once these degenerative changes are established, shunt treatment—even when optimized with pressure adjustments—does not result in significant clinical improvement [12].
In early non-responders, it is conceivable that valve adjustments may still alleviate pressure in some ischemic regions, providing initial symptom relief. However, the persistence of neurological symptoms in these patients suggests that, despite adjustments, the underlying ischemic damage has progressed too far to be reversed [5]. This rapid decline is likely driven by an interaction between persistent ischemic changes and irreversible neuronal damage. Studies such as those by Klinge et al. support this view, revealing that improvements in cerebral blood flow after shunt placement are often limited in late-stage NPH, particularly in areas affected by chronic ischemia [16]. This may also explain the flaw in utilising CSF tap test as a means of selecting long term shunt responders.
A more compelling implication of our findings is that these early non-responders may represent a later stage of iNPH that does not benefit from shunt surgery. This group, particularly those identified in the first six months after surgery, could benefit from more sophisticated diagnostic tools like MRE prior to intervention. Early identification of these patients, using advanced neuroimaging to detect brain stiffness and ischemic damage, could save both patients and healthcare systems from unnecessary interventions and allow for a focus on exploring alternative treatment strategies—an area where further research is urgently needed.
A second theory, although less supported by our data, posits that non-responders, especially early ones, may suffer from concurrent neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s or vascular dementia, which coexist with iNPH. This theory suggests that while shunt adjustments may alleviate the hydrocephalus component, coexisting degenerative pathologies persist, driving the non-responsiveness in this subset of patients [3]. This notion is further supported by the work of Freimann et al., who observed limited or no improvement in certain brain regions after shunt interventions in patients with concurrent neurodegenerative conditions [8]. However, our regression analysis showing no significant correlation between comorbid neurodegenerative conditions and symptom persistence makes this explanation less likely in our cohort.
Overall, the ineffectiveness of shunt valve adjustments in both early and late non-responders likely stems from the pathophysiological changes of iNPH itself. Chronic ischemic damage and increased brain stiffness in later stages of the disease may render the brain tissue incapable of responding to pressure reductions. These findings further underscore the importance of early intervention and precise diagnostics, such as MRE, to identify patients who may not benefit from shunt surgery and to focus on exploring novel treatment strategies to manage their symptoms. Understanding and predicting the late non-response phenotype in iNPH will likey require a multidisciplinary approach, integrating neuroimaging, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, and advanced computational models. Prospective longitudinal studies, involving in depth phenotyping and high-resolution neuroimaging, will be instrumental in exploring the temporal evolution of iNPH and the transition to late non-response. Such studies would not only shed light on the underlying mechanisms but also assist in the development of predictive models and targeted therapeutic interventions, tailored to the individual patient's pathophysiological profile.
Limitations
This study's retrospective design and the reliance on clinical records introduce potential biases related to data completeness and the accuracy of symptom reporting. The single-centre setting may also limit the generalizability of the findings, and the categorization of non-responders based on time intervals, while useful for analysis, may oversimplify the complex and individualized nature of symptom progression in iNPH. Additionally, the regression analysis, while providing some insights, is constrained by the data's retrospective nature and the sample size, limiting the robustness and generalizability of the findings.
Conclusion
In this cohort of 65 patients followed for a mean of 3.75 years after ventriculoperitoneal shunting, 54% were early non‑responders (< 6 months), 15% were late non‑responders (> 6 months), and ~ 31% were responders at last follow‑up. Routine comorbidity and radiological assessments did not differentiate responders from non‑responders. Valve adjustments (performed in 31% of cases) provided at best transient benefit in some late non‑responders and were ineffective in early non‑responders.
Abbreviations
- AUC
Area under the curve
- CA
Callosal angle
- CSF
Cerebrospinal fluid
- CT
Computed Tomography
- CVS
Cerebrovascular stroke
- DAG
Directed Acyclic Graph
- EDA
Exploratory Data Analysis
- FAMD
Factor Analysis for Mixed Data
- ICP
Intracranial Pressure
- iNPH
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
- MMSE
Mini-Mental State Examination
- MRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- QOL
Quality of Life
- SD
Standard Deviation
- S-NR
Shunt Non-Responders
- VP
Ventriculoperitoneal
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. No funding was received for conducting this study.
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the present study include pseudonymised and anonymised clinical information. Due to ethical and legal restrictions, they cannot be made publicly available. Data may be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to approval by the relevant institutional review board and in accordance with applicable data protection regulations.
Code availability
Code is available upon request.
Declarations
Ethics approval
All procedures performed on patients in this study are in line and accordance with the ethical standards set locally, regionally, nationally and in line with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Consent is not required for this study as it is a retrospective cohort study with routine patient data and management, this research has no effect on patient treatment.
Consent to participate
Consent is not required for this study as it is a retrospective cohort study with routine patient data and management, this research has no effect on patient treatment.
Consent for publication
Consent is not required for this study as it is a retrospective cohort study with routine patient data and management, this research has no effect on patient treatment.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam and Mahmoud El-Khatib contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Andren K, Wikkelso C, Tisell M, Hellstrom P (2014) Natural course of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85:806–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arani A, Murphy MC, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Lake DS, Kruse SA, Jack CR Jr, Ehman RL, Huston J 3rd (2015) Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults. Neuroimage 111:59–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Bådagård H, Braun M, Nilsson D, Stridh L, Virhammar J (2020) Negative predictors of shunt surgery outcome in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 141(3):219–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bateman GA (2008) The pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: cerebral ischemia or altered venous hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:198–203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bech-Azeddine R, Høgh P, Juhler M, Gjerris F, Waldemar G (2007) Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: clinical comorbidity correlated with cerebral biopsy findings and outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78(2):157–161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA, Avezaat CJ, de Jong DA, Gooskens RH, Hermans J (1997) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg 87(5):687–693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fattahi N, Arani A, Perry A, Meyer F, Manduca A, Glaser K, Senjem ML, Ehman RL, Huston J (2016) Mr elastography demonstrates increased brain stiffness in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(3):462–467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Freimann FB, Streitberger KJ, Klatt D, Lin K, McLaughlin J, Braun J, Sprung C, Sack I (2012) Alteration of brain viscoelasticity after shunt treatment in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 54(3):189–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gencer AH, Schwarm FP, Nagl J, Uhl E, Kolodziej MA (2024) The benefits of ventriculoperitoneal shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients-a follow-up of three years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 166(1):372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gutowski P, Rot S, Fritsch M, Meier U, Gölz L, Lemcke J (2020) Secondary deterioration in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: a proposed algorithm of treatment. Fluids Barriers CNS 17(1):18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hebb AO, Cusimano MD (2021) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery 49(5):1166–1184 (discussion 1184–6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jaraj D, Rabiei K, Marlow T, Jensen C, Skoog I, Wikkelsø C (2014) Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 82(16):1449–1454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Junkkari A, Sintonen H, Danner N, Jyrkkänen HK, Rauramaa T, Luikku AJ, Koivisto AM, Roine RP, Viinamäki H, Soininen H, Jääskeläinen JE, Leinonen V (2021) 5-year health-related quality of life outcome in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol 268:3283–3293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kahlon B, Sjunnesson J, Rehncrona S (2007) Long-term outcome in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 60(2):327–32. discussion 332 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15. Kamiya K, Hori M, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Suzuki Y, Kamagata K, Suzuki M, Arai H, Ohtomo K, Aoki S (2014) Axon diameter and intra-axonal volume fraction of the corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus measured by q-space imaging. PLoS One 9(8):e103842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Klinge PM, Brooks DJ, Samii A, Weckesser E, van den Hoff J, Fricke H, Brinker T, Knapp WH, Berding G (2008) Correlates of local cerebral blood flow (CBF) in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients before and after shunting–a retrospective analysis of [(15)O]H(2)O PET-CBF studies in 65 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 110(4):369–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leinonen V, Koivisto AM, Alafuzoff I, Pyykkö OT, Rummukainen J, von Und Zu, Fraunberg M, Jääskeläinen JE, Soininen H, Rinne J, Savolainen S (2012) Cortical brain biopsy in long-term prognostication of 468 patients with possible normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurodegener Dis 10(1–4):166–169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ma TS, Sharma N, Grady MS (2017) A simplified pressure adjustment clinical pathway for programmable valves in NPH patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 159:83–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Malm J, Kristensen B, Stegmayr B, Fagerlund M, Koskinen L (2000) Three-year survival and functional outcome of patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Neurology 55(4):576–578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Merkler AE, Ch’ang J, Parker WE, Murthy SB, Kamel H (2017) The rate of complications after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. World Neurosurg 98:654–658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nadel JL, Wilkinson DA, Linzey JR, Maher CO, Kotagal V, Heth JA (2020) Thirty-day hospital readmission and surgical complication rates for shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a large national database analysis. Neurosurgery 86(6):843–850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nakajima M, Yamada S, Miyajima M, Ishii K, Kuriyama N, Kazui H, Kanemoto H, Suehiro T, Yoshiyama K, Kameda M, Kajimoto Y, Mase M, Murai H, Kita D, Kimura T, Samejima N, Tokuda T, Kaijima M, Akiba C, Kawamura K, Atsuchi M, Hirata Y, Matsumae M, Sasaki M, Yamashita F, Aoki S, Irie R, Miyake H, Kato T, Mori E, Ishikawa M, Date I, Arai H, research committee of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (2021) Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (third edition): endorsed by the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 61(2):63–97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Popal AM, Zhu Z, Guo X, Zheng Z, Cai C, Jiang H, Zhang J, Shao A, Zhu J (2021) Outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus 2 years after surgery. Front Surg 8:641561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pujari S, Kharkar S, Metellus P, Shuck J, Williams MA, Rigamonti D (2008) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: long-term outcome after shunt surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:1282–1286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Savolainen S, Hurskainen H, Paljärvi L, Alafuzoff I, Vapalahti (2002) Five-year outcome of normal pressure hydrocephalus with or without a shunt: predictive value of the clinical signs, neuropsychological evaluation and infusion test. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144(6):515–523. discussion 523 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Thavarajasingam SG, El-Khatib M, Rea M, Russo S, Lemcke J, Al-Nusair L, Vajkoczy P (2021) Clinical predictors of shunt response in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163(10):2641–2672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Thavarajasingam SG, El-Khatib M, Vemulapalli KV, Iradukunda HAS, Laleye J, Russo S, Eichhorn C, Eide PK (2022) Cerebrospinal fluid and venous biomarkers of shunt-responsive idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 164(7):1719–1746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Thavarajasingam SG, El-Khatib M, Vemulapalli K, Iradukunda HAS, K SV, Borchert R, Russo S, Eide PK (2023) Radiological predictors of shunt response in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 165(2):369–419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD (1992) Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 42(1):54–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the present study include pseudonymised and anonymised clinical information. Due to ethical and legal restrictions, they cannot be made publicly available. Data may be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to approval by the relevant institutional review board and in accordance with applicable data protection regulations.
Code is available upon request.



