Skip to main content
Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-borne Diseases logoLink to Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-borne Diseases
. 2025 Aug 22;8:100311. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2025.100311

Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis: An update of Asian perspectives in humans, water and food, 2015–2025

Shahira Abdelaziz Ali Ahmed a,, Sonia Boughattas b, Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi c,d, Huma Khan e, Simuzar Mamedova f,g, Ardra Namboodiri h, Frederick R Masangkay i,j, Panagiotis Karanis k,l,⁎⁎
PMCID: PMC12433489  PMID: 40955286

Abstract

Cryptosporidium species are increasingly recognized as significant enteric pathogens, particularly within developing nations, where they pose serious public health challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis examine a decade of research (2015–2025) to map the epidemiological footprint of Cryptosporidium across Asia, incorporating 228 studies from 28 countries and analyzing a collective sample of 327,783 specimens collected from humans, water, and food. The overall pooled prevalence was 8.1%, with Southeast Asia emerging as the region of highest concern. Among the affected populations, immunocompromised individuals and children demonstrated the highest vulnerability. Environmental contamination was especially pronounced in surface water sources, while vegetables, particularly those sold in wholesale markets, were the most contaminated food matrices. Molecular findings identified 23 distinct species, and several subtypes predominated by C. parvum (IIa, IId) and C. hominis (Ia, Ib). Notably, some water samples from mixed and surface water sources exhibited extraordinarily high oocyst concentrations, reaching up to 80,000 oocysts/l. Diagnostic approaches varied widely, with a considerable proportion of studies employing traditional non-molecular techniques, thereby highlighting the need for more advanced and standardized detection protocols. Despite regional disparities and methodological variability, the findings reveal a consistent pattern of widespread exposure and environmental circulation of Cryptosporidium species across the continent. This underscores an urgent need for multisectoral collaborations and interventions aimed at bolstering water and food safety infrastructure, enhancing diagnostic capacity, and strengthening public health systems to effectively manage and prevent cryptosporidiosis throughout Asia.

Keywords: Cryptosporidium, Cryptosporidiosis, Asia, Genotype, Oocysts, Prevalence

Graphical abstract

Image 1

Highlights

  • Across Asia, Cryptosporidium spp. circulated with a prevalence of 8.1%.

  • Immuno-compromised individuals and children were the most affected population.

  • Surface water had the highest Cryptosporidium spp. contamination rate (20.3%).

  • Food matrices like fruits/vegetables (wholesale markets) had a contamination rate of 5.6%.

  • A total of 23 Cryptosporidium species were reported: C. parvum and C. hominis were dominant.

1. Introduction

Species of Cryptosporidium are increasingly recognized as significant enteric pathogens. The genus was first discovered over a century ago by Tyzzer, who described Cryptosporidium muris in the gastric epithelium of laboratory mice (Tyzzer, 1907). Cryptosporidium spp. were not recognized as infectious agents in humans until 1976, when the first report of infection with Cryptosporidium in a human, a 3-year-old child suffering from severe acute enterocolitis, was published (Nime et al., 1976). Cryptosporidium spp. are particularly prevalent in low-to middle-income countries, and the global estimated prevalence of Cryptosporidium species has been reported to be 7.6% (Dong et al., 2020).

Transmission of Cryptosporidium spp. typically occurs via the ingestion of mature oocysts through a faecal-oral route, frequently facilitated by contaminated food or water (Gallas-Lindemann et al., 2016; Ahmed and Karanis, 2018; Ben Ayed et al., 2024), person-to-person, or zoonotic transmission (Sponseller et al., 2014). Following ingestion, oocysts are either expelled in faeces or initiate autoinfection (Chalmers and Davies, 2010). Cryptosporidium species exhibit a broad vertebrate host range, with humans and mammals, such as cattle, serving as definitive hosts (Mamedova and Karanis, 2021). Furthermore, many of these species demonstrate distinct host specificities, exemplified by C. hominis, primarily infecting humans, C. tyzzeri, which targets mice, and C. cuniculus, which infects rabbits (Guérin and Striepen, 2020). This is, however, an evolving trait, since the anthroponotic subtypes of C. parvum (such as the IIc gp60 subtypes) have undergone evolutionary adaptation toward increased host specificity, becoming primarily human-associated rather than maintaining the broader infectivity typically observed in subtypes capable of infecting both cattle and a range of other hosts (Guérin and Striepen, 2020).

In immunocompetent individuals, cryptosporidiosis typically presents as a self-limiting diarrhoeal illness (Lee et al., 2016). However, among children, Cryptosporidium-associated diarrhoea is a significant cause of mortality, ranking second to rotavirus in children under five years of age (Wang et al., 2020). Cryptosporidiosis exhibits heightened severity in immunocompromised populations, including individuals with HIV/AIDS, organ transplant recipients, and cancer patients (Bouzid et al., 2013; Ahmed et al., 2023). These patients may experience persistent diarrhoea, weight loss, abdominal cramps, fever, nausea, vomiting, and extra-intestinal cryptosporidiosis, affecting the hepatobiliary system, pancreas, upper gastrointestinal tract, and urinary bladder (Bouzid et al., 2013; Dupuy et al., 2021).

Exhibiting substantial genetic diversity, the genus Cryptosporidium currently encompasses more than 45 recognized species and over 120 identified genotypes (Mamedova and Karanis, 2021; Ryan et al., 2021a; Tůmová et al., 2023). Classification is based on criteria including morphological, biological, and molecular data (Ryan et al., 2014). Molecular investigations revealed that at least 20 distinct species are implicated in human cryptosporidiosis. However, C. hominis and C. parvum are the predominant species, accounting for approximately 90% of human infections (Ryan et al., 2014; Thompson and Ash, 2016).

Globally, water-borne cryptosporidiosis is prevalent, and outbreaks originating from contaminated water systems, encompassing sources such as drinking water, recreational water, surface water, groundwater, and wastewater, pose a potential risk of infection to individuals across all age demographics (Karanis et al., 2007). Water-borne pathogens contaminate water sources when faecal matter containing infectious oocysts from infected hosts enters the water system (Mahmoudi et al., 2017). These infections are prevalent in regions with limited access to potable water and adequate sanitation (Ahmed et al., 2018). Across seven regions in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, Cryptosporidium is recognized as the fourth leading etiologic agent of diarrhoea (Checkley et al., 2015). Within the Middle East and North African (MENA) region, Cryptosporidium species exhibit an overall prevalence of 24.5%, with Egypt contributing the highest proportion of reported studies (28.5%), followed by Iran (17.1%) (Ben Ayed et al., 2024).

Between 2007 and 2011, Cryptosporidium species were identified as the causative agent in 60.3% of reported water-borne outbreaks (Karanis et al., 2007; Baldursson and Karanis, 2011). Subsequently, infection rates increased between 2011 and 2016, with Cryptosporidium species accounting for 63% of global protozoan parasite outbreaks (Efstratiou et al., 2017). This proportion rose to 77.4% from 2017 to 2022, with C. hominis and C. parvum being the most frequently implicated species in these outbreaks (Bourli et al., 2023). Cumulatively, the total number of water-borne outbreaks attributed to Cryptosporidium species reached 1227 between the years 2004 and 2023 (Karanis et al., 2007; Baldursson and Karanis, 2011; Efstratiou et al., 2017; Rosado-García et al., 2017; Bourli et al., 2023). Recreational water environments, such as swimming pools, water parks, and hot tubs, represent a significant vehicle of transmission in Cryptosporidium outbreaks due to contamination from infected individuals, animals, sewage, or surface runoff (Fewtrell and Kay, 2015; Efstratiou et al., 2017; Bourli et al., 2023).

Cryptosporidium spp. exhibit a high degree of adaptation for transmission via the faecal-oral route and are implicated in over eight million cases of food-borne illness annually (Ryan et al., 2018). A recent study by Eslahi et al. (2024) reported that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium species contamination in fruits and vegetables was highest in Europe (13.32%), followed by the Americas (12.38%), Asia (6.00%), and Africa (4.34%). Pre-harvest Cryptosporidium-food contamination can arise from various sources, including soil, faecal matter, irrigation water, insects, domestic and wild fauna, contaminated water employed for pesticide or fungicide application, and human contact. Using compost and manure as fertilizers renders soil a notable source of food contamination, a risk potentially amplified in organic agricultural practices due to increased manure application (Alegbeleye et al., 2018; Golomazou et al., 2024). Post-harvest Cryptosporidium-food-contamination can occur due to faecal matter, harvesting implements, transport containers and vehicles, processing machinery, and human handling (Beuchat, 2002).

Globally, 67 documented food-borne outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis have occurred. Notably, C. parvum was identified as the causative agent in 96.5% of these cases between 1984 and 2020 (Ahmed and Karanis, 2018; Zahedi and Ryan, 2020). The limited number of reported food-borne outbreaks is attributed to insufficient surveillance systems and the inherent difficulty in tracing the specific food item responsible for the outbreak (Zahedi and Ryan, 2020).

The Asian continent encompasses 58.74% of the global population, exhibiting a population density of 156 individuals per km2, with 53.6% of its inhabitants residing in urban centers (Worldometer, 2025). A prior review indicated significant infection rates of Cryptosporidium species throughout Asia, demonstrating regional variations (Mahmoudi et al., 2017). The prevalence of Cryptosporidium species infection across the Asian continent has been reported to be associated with several identifiable risk factors including water scarcity, deficiencies in waste management infrastructure, the excessive application of manure in agricultural practices, suboptimal hygiene and sanitation standards, the consumption of untreated water, the effects of climate change, and close contact with animals (Bekturganov et al., 2016).

In many Asian countries, environmental conditions and extreme weather phenomena, such as droughts, have played a significant role in contaminating water sources and facilitating the spread of microorganisms (Bekturganov et al., 2016). Extreme weather events, including intense rainfall and flooding, are posited to transport organic fertilizers contaminated with Cryptosporidium oocysts into waterways, potentially overwhelming wastewater treatment infrastructure. Conversely, droughts can lead to increased concentration of oocysts in rivers. Also, this season-driven water scarcity situation compels populations to utilize even contaminated water sources (Ahmed et al., 2018). In MENA, a region encompassing Asian countries, Cryptosporidium species have been widely reported as prevalent in both surface water and wastewater. These contaminated water sources can serve as reservoirs for oocysts, which may infiltrate soil systems, particularly in areas with poor sanitation or during heavy rainfall and flooding events. Through percolation and subsurface movement, the oocysts-contaminated soil can eventually reach groundwater sources, posing a risk to drinking water supplies if not adequately treated, thereby contributing to human and animal infections (Gallas-Lindemann et al., 2012; Bekturganov et al., 2016; Lim and Nissapatorn, 2017; Alegbeleye et al., 2018; Ben Ayed et al., 2024).

A comprehensive review by Mahmoudi et al. (2017) documented the Cryptosporidium epidemiological landscape, genetic diversity, geographical distribution, and transmission dynamics in Asia from 2000 to 2015. Notably, India and China exhibited the highest reported incidence of Cryptosporidium infection. The prevalence of infection was found to be heterogeneous, contingent upon the specific population under investigation. Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected in surface water throughout Asia, demonstrating frequency and species composition variability. Soil and water were identified as primary vehicles for transmission, with contamination also observed in various vegetables and their wash water. The predominant Cryptosporidium species identified across the continent were C. hominis and C. parvum, alongside less frequent occurrences of C. felis, C. muris, C. meleagridis, and C. suis (Mahmoudi et al., 2017).

This review aimed to provide an updated assessment of the Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis burden across Asia, extending the temporal analysis by ten years. Specifically, this study focused on the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection within Asian populations and its environmental circulation in water and food sources.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Search strategies and data sources

The systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021) (Supplementary file 1: MeSH keywords and Supplementary Table S1) incorporating defined inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as a bias assessment, as detailed below. To assess the Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence and distribution in different countries across the Asian continent, PubMed was used in the literature selection process that started on 6 February 2025 and concluded on 21 March 2025. The articles were searched without language restriction. However, a temporal filter was utilized and applied from 1 January 2015 to 6 February 2025, covering the past 10 years as an update to a previously published review (Mahmoudi et al., 2017).

The search method was confined to title/abstract/keywords utilizing MeSH terms/keywords, with the Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis keywords combined with each Asian country name independently, for a total of 50 Asian countries (https://www.countries-ofthe-world.com/countries-of-asia.html) employing Boolean positional operators (AND, OR) (Supplementary file 1: MeSH keywords). The reference list of the included studies was also used to search for related articles for retrieval.

2.2. Eligibility criteria and data extraction

Articles with titles indicating the subject of Cryptosporidium/cryptosporidiosis in any population were screened and selected as part of the eligibility for inclusion in the literature review. Abstracts and potentially relevant full texts were reviewed independently by six authors (SA, MM, HK, SM, SB, and AN), with any conflicts resolved by consensus (SA, SB, and FM).

For a comprehensive full-text review, the following information was extracted: study site, year of publication, Cryptosporidium detection methods, population category, age group for human category, prevalence of Cryptosporidium, species/genotypes/subtypes, symptomatology for humans, specifics of symptoms experienced (intestinal and/or extra-intestinal), number of infected, total population sampled, and overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection, as reported by the authors or estimated from data provided in the paper.

Publications were excluded if they lacked an abstract, a full text, or used languages other than English, or were unrelated to the objective of the study, or had the goal of diagnosis or intervention, or were performed in countries outside of the Asian continent, or were about genetic and/or protein analysis, or were not related to Cryptosporidium, or were reviews or case reports or comments and letters to the editors, or if they discussed multicenter or modelling or experimental studies, or if they were publications with confusing data (ambiguous data, poor quality citation, include the same results as another paper published by the same author).

2.3. Data analysis

The present review included robust data and multiple variables, such as (i) the number of included studies, (ii) the number of Asian countries, (iii) the number of populations, and (iv) the category of populations.

To simplify data distribution across the Asian continent, Asia was initially divided into five regions: “Central, West, South, East, and Southeast” (World Atlas, 2023). The Asian region was categorized into 50 individual countries according to United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD, 2025), i.e. Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Brunei, Cambodia, Georgia, China, Cyprus, Iraq, Iran, Indonesia, India, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Philippines, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, and Yemen. The included studies were classified into three groups according to the source of Cryptosporidium, i.e. humans, water, and/or food.

Due to different population terms used in the analysis, the human populations were categorized into: (i) children (< 1 to < 18 years of age); (ii) adults (18 to > 80 years of age); (iii) both adults and children (BAC) (< 1 to > 80 years of age); (iv) immunocompromised/immunodeficient/immunosuppressed (III) (patients with HIV, cancer/malignancies, on hemodialysis, COVID-19, end-stage renal disease, and malnutrition); (v) individuals posing transmission (IPT) (workers in animal facilities, food handlers, expatriate laborers, farm workers, handlers of domestic animals); and (vi) symptomatic individuals (SI) (diarrhoea patients and those with gastrointestinal symptoms).

Water sources were categorized according to the water type: (i) drinking water (DW) (municipal water and tap water); (ii) surface water (SF) (rivers, floating biofilms, wells, streams, canals, recreational water, irrigation water, pumps, springs, ponds, and lakes); (iii) wastewater (WW) (sewage, slaughter water, and raw/treated wastewater); and (iv) swimming pools (SwP); and (v) mixed water (MW) (treated and untreated water, sewage, and river water).

Food sources are comprised of fruits and vegetables (leafy greens, fresh produce, and raw vegetables. The sources of food comprised wholesale markets (vegetables/fruits sourced from large supermarkets, often involving wholesale distribution, and may be sold in bulk or through various retailers) and retail vendors (specific vendors or sellers directly selling vegetables at riverbanks and farm stalls, or through direct sales to customers).

Mixed sources/categories were the studies that investigated a mixed source of humans and/or water, and/or food. Within each primary source category, subcategories were also identified. Consequently, a single study may involve mixed sources (e.g. humans, water, and/or food) and/or mixed subcategories within a source (e.g. vegetables and fruits under the food category).

A meta-analysis approach was used to determine the significance of Cryptosporidium spp. and incidence in different countries of Asia and different categories of populations/samples. Consequently, we extracted data from studies retained by the eligibility criteria section with a subgrouping approach owing to the number and diversity of the target parameters (Ben Ayed et al., 2024). The MedCalc statistical software version 23.2.1 (MedCalc Software Ltd, Ostend, Belgium, https://www.medcalc.org/) was utilized to conduct a proportion meta-analysis to obtain the effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) associated with the variance for the desired set of studies. As measured by Cochran’s score Q, the heterogeneity of observations should be observed with P(Q) < 0.0005 when tested against a chi-square distribution to conduct correlation analysis. Publication bias was explored in the current analysis and assessed by Egger’s test (E), with a low P(E)-value indicating publication bias.

3. Results

3.1. Search results

A total of 1838 articles were retrieved from the PubMed database, with 339 duplicates removed. After screening 1499 titles and abstracts, 490 articles were retained for eligibility assessment at the full-text screening stage. Ultimately, 228 original studies were included in the meta-analysis. The selection process and the flowchart of the literature search are presented in (Supplementary file 1: Fig. S1).

3.2. Characteristics of the included studies

A total of 228 studies conducted across the Asian continent over the past decade were included and classified across three sources (humans, water, and food). The studies included in this analysis were published between 2015 and the first quarter of 2025, encompassing 56% (28/50) of the countries in Asia. No studies were included from the following 22 countries: Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bhutan, Brunei, Georgia, Cyprus, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Maldives, North Korea, Oman, Palestine, Russia, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.

Regarding the human population categories analyzed, children constituted the most studied age group, appearing in 54 studies. Individuals encompassing both adults and children were represented in 42 studies, while adults were exclusively featured in 40 studies. Immunocompromised individuals, individuals posing transmission risks, and symptomatic individuals were reported in 29, 11, and 12 studies, respectively.

The age range of the Asian population examined in the included studies extended from 0 to 99 years. The Asian populations were further categorized based on symptomatic status: symptomatic in 84 studies, asymptomatic in 58 studies, and a combination of both in 9 studies. However, the symptomatic status remained unspecified in 37 studies. Symptomatic individuals exhibited one or more of the following clinical manifestations: diarrhoea, abdominal pain, constipation, flatulence, nausea, vomiting, foul-smelling faeces, and gastrointestinal discomfort. Of particular interest, Cryptosporidium was detected in human sputum in a single study (Bagci et al., 2022).

Investigations into water categories revealed that surface water was the most frequently studied, appearing in 23 studies. Wastewater and drinking water were each examined in 8 studies. Swimming pools and mixed water sources were the focus of 3 studies each.

Regarding food sources in Asia, vegetables and fruits were the only food items investigated. Vegetables were the most examined, including raw and leafy greens such as Chinese cabbage, spinach, cauliflower, green onion, and radish, to name a few. Seven studies indicated that vendors (from farms, fields, streets, and riverbanks) were the primary source of these food items.

3.3. Features of the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Asia

3.3.1. Overall pooled Cryptosporidium prevalence in Asia

Using the total number of explored pooled specimens and the number of pooled infected/contaminated samples investigated in 228 studies, the pooled prevalence of Cryptosporidium among the total sample size of 327,783 combining humans, water and food sources, was estimated to be 8.1% (95% CI: 6.9–9.2%; Q: 24623.6, df = 227, P(Q) < 0.0001; I2: 99.08%, P(E) < 0.0001) (Supplementary file 2).

Four regions (East, South, West, and Southeast Asia) served as the basis for the division in the present review. No eligible paper was retained from Central Asia, with pooled proportions increasing from West Asia (1.3%; 95% CI: 1.3–1.4%); East Asia (3.4%; 95% CI: 3.2–3.6%); South Asia (6.5%; 95% CI: 6.3–6.8%) reaching the highest prevalence within Southeast Asia (7.9%; 95% CI: 7.4–8.5%) (Fig. 1 and Supplementary file 2). The Eastern, Western, Central, Southern, and Southeastern regions accounted for 18.4% (42/228), 21.5% (49/228), 0% (0/228), 45.2% (103/228), and 14.9% (34/228) of the 28 countries with included studies, respectively. The results should be interpreted with caution, as West Asia exhibited the lowest regional prevalence at 1.3% across 49 included studies. Notably, this region contributed the largest sample sizes, with Israel (n = 138,909) and Turkey (n = 77,945) leading. Additionally, West Asia was home to the highest territorial prevalences across all countries, led by Iraq (58.75%) and Armenia (37.50%).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species in pooled human, water, and food sources by regions in Asia. Country/Territory codes: AE, United Arab Emirates; AM, Armenia; BD, Bangladesh; KH, Cambodia; CN, China; IN, India; ID, Indonesia; IR, Iran; IQ, Iraq; IL, Israel; JO, Jordan; KR, Republic of Korea/South Korea; LB, Lebanon; MY, Malaysia; MN, Mongolia; MM, Myanmar; NP, Nepal; PK, Pakistan; PH, Philippines; QA, Qatar; SA, Saudi Arabia; SG, Singapore; SY, Syria; TW, Taiwan; TH, Thailand; TR, Turkey; VN, Vietnam; YE, Yemen (Alpha-2 code ISO 3166 international standard; https://www.iban.com/country-codes). The map template was modified from a free source of https://www.mapchart.net/asia.html.

Further analysis with country correlation was subsequently explored, since no publication bias was observed according to Egger’s (P(E) = 0.136) and Begg’s (P(B) = 0.497) tests. Data extracted from the 28 investigated countries (Q: 14669.1, df = 27, P(Q) < 0.0001; I2: 99.82%) reported pooled Cryptosporidium occurrence varying widely from 0% (95% CI: 0–0.1%) within Taiwan to 58.8% (95% CI: 56.7–60.8%) within Iraq (Fig. 2, Supplementary file 1: Fig. S2, and Supplementary file 2). However, the publication bias observed with the country correlation (P(E) = 0.001) did not allow for further sub-analysis by this parameter within the different sources (Supplementary file 1: Fig. S3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Geographical distribution of Cryptosporidium species prevalence in pooled human, water, and food sources in Asia. K = ×1000. Country/Territory codes: AE, United Arab Emirates; AM, Armenia; BD, Bangladesh; KH, Cambodia; CN, China; IN, India; ID, Indonesia; IR, Iran; IQ, Iraq; IL, Israel; JO, Jordan; KR, Republic of Korea/South Korea; LB, Lebanon; MY, Malaysia; MN, Mongolia; MM, Myanmar; NP, Nepal; PK, Pakistan; PH, Philippines; QA, Qatar; SA, Saudi Arabia; SG, Singapore; SY, Syria; TW, Taiwan; TH, Thailand; TR, Turkey; VN, Vietnam; YE, Yemen (Alpha-2 code ISO 3166 international standard; https://www.iban.com/country-codes). The map template was modified from a free source of https://www.mapchart.net/asia.html.

There were studies in each of the 28 Asian countries, ranging from one in Armenia, Cambodia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Qatar, Singapore, Syria, Taiwan, and Yemen to as many as 37 in China (Fig. 2).

The aforementioned results from the previous territories should be interpreted with caution, as the actual relationships among countries with the highest and lowest infection rates, sample sizes, and the number of studies reflect a wide range of perspectives. From a prevalence perspective, Iraq reported the highest proportion of 58.8% (four studies), while Taiwan recorded none (0%) (one study), despite both countries having relatively few included studies. Interestingly, sample size patterns revealed further contrasts: Israel had the largest cumulative sample size (138,909 across three studies) yet ranked 26th in prevalence (0.7%), suggesting low infection rates despite extensive sampling. In contrast, Armenia, with just 24 samples from a single study, reported the second-highest prevalence (37.5%). China and India contributed the most studies with 37 and 35 studies, respectively, but did not rank among the highest in prevalence, standing at 18th and 8th, respectively. Several countries, including Armenia, Qatar, and Taiwan, had only one study, yet Armenia and Qatar stood out with notably high prevalences of 37.5% and 15.5%, ranking 2nd and 5th, respectively (Supplementary file 1: Table S2).

An illustration of the overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Asia over time, based on the year of publication, is presented in Supplementary file 1: Fig. S4. Between 2015 and 2024, no consistent upward or downward trend was observed in the number of studies involving human, water, and food sources collectively. However, pronounced peaks in Cryptosporidium detection emerged in 2019 and 2024. Notably, only two studies were retrieved for the first quarter of 2025, suggesting that data for this period remain incomplete (Supplementary file 1: Fig. S4, Supplementary file 2). The previous findings must be interpreted with careful consideration, as the observed increases in Cryptosporidium prevalence across different matrices likely result from a complex interplay of multiple contributing factors.

3.3.2. Human Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence in Asia

Within the present study, the human source data were extracted from 188 studies covering 27 countries, generating a sample size of 319,821 with an estimated overall prevalence of 5.9% (Q: 11812.2, df = 26, P(Q) < 0.0001; I2: 99.78%). The current analysis stratified the human population into six categories (see Section 2.3). It is worth noting that the lowest prevalence of 0.7% (95% CI: 0.7–0.8%) was observed with the SI category, whereas the highest prevalence of 8.0% (95% CI: 7.4–8.6%) was recorded within the III category (Fig. 3 and Supplementary file 2).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Proportional prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. within the different human populations in Asia. Abbreviations: BAC, both adults and children; III, immunocompromised/immunodeficient/immunosuppressed; IPT, individuals posing transmission; SI, symptomatic individuals.

3.3.3. Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence in water in Asia

The water data explored within this review was extracted from 44 studies covering 16 countries, generating a sample size of 5448 with an estimated overall prevalence of 23.2%. Since we observed statistically significant heterogeneity indices (Q: 1071.1, df = 43, P(Q) < 0.0001; I2: 95.99%, P(E) = 0.0003), a dependable subgrouping random meta-analysis was conducted for each of the five water categories investigated, i.e. DW, SF, WW, MW, and SwP. The highest Cryptosporidium prevalence in Asia was recorded within the surface water category (20.3%; 95% CI: 18.6–21.9%) while the lowest prevalence was observed within the drinking water category (8.9%; 95% CI: 7.3–10.7%) (Fig. 4 and Supplementary file 2).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Proportional prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. within different water categories (drinking water, surface water, wastewater, mixed waters and swimming pools) across the Asian continent.

3.3.4. Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence in food in Asia

Cryptosporidium contamination in Asian countries was observed in food matrices composed of fruits and fresh produces targeting 2919 samples within ten studies (Q: 165.9, df = 9, P(Q) < 0.0001; I2: 94.58%) and advancing a random estimated prevalence of 5.6% (95% CI: 2.2–10.4%) without any apparent publication bias (P(E) = 0.079, P(B) = 0.929). The highest prevalence of 29.6% (95% CI: 17.9–43.6%) was observed by Wei et al. (2019), who reported strawberry farm contamination. When investigating food sources correlation, surprisingly, food from markets had a Cryptosporidium prevalence higher than food investigated from vendors (Supplementary file 1: Fig. S5) with 9.3% (95% CI: 5.4–14.7%) and 2.9% (95% CI: 2.4–3.7%), respectively (Supplementary file 2). However, a publication bias was observed within Egger’s test (P(E) < 0.0001), possibly due to a significant disparity between the sample sizes of the two categories.

3.4. Methods applied and species/subtypes of Cryptosporidium in Asia

3.4.1. Cryptosporidium spp. in the Asian population

Processing human samples in the Asian studies involved various concentration techniques, including sedimentation and flotation. Certain studies incorporated sputum samples, tissue biopsies, and faecal samples obtained from infected individuals.

For detecting Cryptosporidium species, non-molecular methods were employed in 73 out of 188 studies (38.8%), while molecular techniques were utilized in 50 out of 188 studies (26.6%). A combination of both methodologies was implemented in 65 studies (34.6%).

The non-molecular methodologies included wet mount examination with saline and iodine, staining procedures such as modified Ziehl-Neelsen (mZN) and methylene blue staining, rapid immunoassays (RIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), immunofluorescent assays (IFA), immunomagnetic separation followed by IFA (IMS-IFA), and histopathological examination when biopsy samples were included alongside faecal analysis. The molecular methodologies employed included conventional PCR (cPCR), nested PCR (nPCR), restriction fragment length polymorphism PCR (RFLP-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), real-time PCR (qPCR), multiplex PCR, and sequencing. The small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene of Cryptosporidium spp. was the most frequently targeted locus for molecular identification, followed by the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP) gene. While loci like actin and heat-shock protein 70 gene (Hsp70) were only occasionally employed for species identification, subtyping efforts predominantly centered around the glycoprotein 60 gene (gp60), remained the focal point of most genetic analyses.

Sixty studies were conducted across Asia, focusing on the Asian population (Table 1), and included the genotyping of Cryptosporidium isolates. These investigations revealed a variety of Cryptosporidium species. In some instances, a single species was identified within a given study, including C. parvum, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. felis, C. scrofarum, and C. suis. Conversely, other studies documented multiple Cryptosporidium species, while some identified mixed genotypes within individual isolates (Table 1).

Table 1.

Genotyping/subtyping analysis of Cryptosporidium species across the Asian population.

No. Country (Region) Study groups (age in years) GIT symptoms Molecular methods Target gene Species Subtypes Reference
1 Bangladesh Children (<5–14) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis (IdA15G1, IaA19R3, IbA9G3, IaA23R3) Karim et al. (2024)
2 Bangladesh (Mymensingh) Household members Diarrhoea nPCR SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA17G2R2 Maxamhud et al. (2025)
3 Bangladesh (Mirpur) Children (0–2) Diarrhoea qPCR COWP, gp60 C. hominis, C. parvum N/I Korpe et al. (2016)
4 Cambodia (Siem Reap) Children (<16) Diarrhoea qPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. canis, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. parvum, C. suis, C. ubiquitum C. hominis (IaA16R6), C. parvum (IIeA7G1) Moore et al. (2016)
5 China (Wuhan) Children Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. meleagridis IIIbA21G1R1, IIIbA22G1R1, IIIbA26G1R1 Wang et al. (2017)
6 China (Shanghai) Mentally disabled children (1 month to 10 years) Diarrhoea nPCR, RFLP-PCR SSU rRNA, COWP C. hominis IaA14R4 Wang et al. (2018a)
7 China (Zhengzhou, Henan) Children (1–14) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. parvum C. parvum (IIdA19G1) Yu et al. (2019)
8 China (Binyang) BAC (5–50) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60, Hsp70 C. occultus, C. viatorum C. viatorum (XVaA3h) Xu et al. (2020)
9 China (Jilin) GIT cancer patients (≤50 to >60) GIT disturbance nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA15G2R1, IIaA15G2R2, IIaA13G2R2 Zhang et al. (2020)
10 China (Qinmu) Workers in animal facility, villagers nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. andersoni, C. hominis, C. parvum N/I Li et al. (2021)
11 China (Southern Xinjiang) Children (2–6) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. felis, C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis (IbA9G3, IdA14, IfA12G1), C. parvum (IIdA14G1, IIdA15G1) Wang et al. (2022)
12 China (Harbin) HIV (<30 to >50) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. cuniculus, C. hominis, C. meleagridis C. meleagridis (IIIbA23G1R1, IIIeA15G2R, IIIgA26G1R1), C. hominis (Ia18R4, IbA20G2) Zhao et al. (2022)
13 China (Shanghai) HIV/AIDS patients (18–64) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. andersoni, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. parvum C. hominis (IaA28R4, IeA12G3T3) Jiang et al. (2023)
14 China (Inner Mongolia) Children (<5) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIdA23G3, IIdA24G3, IIdA24G4, IIdA25G3, IIdA25G4 Guo et al. (2024)
15 China (Heilongjiang) Villagers nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIdA19G1 Hao et al. (2024)
16 China (Wenzhou) Children Both diarrhoea and non-diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. baileyi, C. felis, C. parvum, C. viatorum C. felis (XIXa), C. parvum (IIdA19G1, IInA10), C. viatorum (XVaA3g) Zhao et al. (2024)
17 India Transplant recipients and immunocompetent Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, COWP, DHFR, Cpgp40/15 C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis (Ia, Ie, If), C. parvum (IId, IIc) Yadav et al. (2016)
18 India (Assam) BAC Diarrhoea nPCR, RFLP-PCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. andersoni, C. parvum N/I Hussain et al. (2017)
19 India (Vellore) Children (3) Diarrhoea nPCR, RFLP-PCR SSU rRNA C. felis, C. hominis, C. parvum, C. meleagridis, Mixed (C. hominis + C. parvum), Mixed (C. andersoni + C. muris) N/I Kattula et al. (2016)
20 India (Puducherry) Immunocompromised (11 months to 83 years) cPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. hominis, C. parvum N/I Vanathy et al. (2017)
21 India (Delhi) BAC Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60, CP56, CP47, MSC6-7 C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis: CP47 (IA30G16, IA44G28, IA45G29, IA46G30, IA51G35); GP60 (IaA19R3, IbA9G3, IbA10G2, IdA15G1, IdA17G1, IeA11G3T3, IfA14G1) Yadav et al. (2017)
22 India (West Bengal) Farm workers qPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, Hsp70 C. parvum, C. ryanae N/I Das et al. (2019)
23 India Haematological malignancy patients Diarrhoea nPCR, RFLP-PCR, Sequencing COWP, SSU rRNA C. hominis N/I Ghoshal et al. (2020)
24 India (Kolkata) BAC (3–50) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing Hsp70 C. hominis, C. parvum, C. viatorum N/I Sardar et al. (2021)
25 India (Delhi) Diarrhoea patients (5–36) Diarrhoea nPCR, RFLP-PCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. felis, C. hominis, C. parvum, C. viatorum C. hominis (Ia, Ib, Id, Ie), C. parvum (IIa, IIc, IId, IIe) Khalil et al. (2017)
26 Indonesia (Lombok) BAC cPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. suis N/I Resnhaleksmana et al. (2021)
27 Iran (Tonekabon) BAC nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA16G2R1 Shahdoust et al. (2016)
28 Iran (Gonbad Kavoos) Children Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA16G2R1, IIaA17G1R1, IIaA22G3R1, IIdA17G1d Sharbatkhori et al. (2015)
29 Iran (Tabriz) Children (3 months to 12 years) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Poor et al. (2015)
30 Iran (Fars) Immunocompetent GIT disturbance RFLP-PCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Mohammadpour et al. (2016)
31 Iran (Tehran) Immunocompetent GIT disturbance nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA16G2R1, IIaA17G1R1, IIdA17G1d Ranjbar et al. (2016)
32 Iran (Khuzestan) HIV/AIDS patients PCR, nPCR, RFLP-PCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. parvum N/I Ghafari et al. (2018)
33 Iran (Tehran) Immunodeficient (COVID, cancer, organ transplant) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Esteghamati et al. (2019)
34 Iran (Kurdistan) Adults nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA15G2R1 Bahrami et al. (2020)
35 Iran (Central part) Malignancy (lymphoma, leukemia, organ transplant) (>15) Both diarrhoea and non-diarrhoea Semi-nPCR SSU rRNA C. hominis N/I Izadi et al. (2020)
HIV patients C. hominis, C. parvum
36 Iran (Central part) Malignancy (lymphoma, leukemia, organ transplant) (>15) Both diarrhoea and non-diarrhoea Semi-nPCR SSU rRNA C. hominis N/I Izadi et al. (2020)
37 Iran (Tabriz) Malnourished children (0–12) Both diarrhoea and non-diarrhoea nPCR, LAMP, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Madadi et al. (2020)
38 Iran (Isfahan) Cancer patients nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis (IbA6G3), C. parvum (IIaA18G3R1, IIaA17G2R1) Pestechian et al. (2022)
39 Iran (Tehran) BAC (15 to >50) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Bahadorizadeh et al. (2024)
40 Jordan (Zarqa) BAC (10 months to 56 years) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis (IbA9G3, IbA10G2), C. parvum (IIdA20G1, IIaA15G2R1) Hijjawi et al. (2016)
41 Jordan (Al-Mafraq) Cancer children Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA17G2R1, IIaA16G2R1 Hijjawi et al. (2017)
42 Jordan (Al-Mafraq, Amman, Irbid, Maan, Zarqa) BAC (1 month to 54 years) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA15G2R1 Hijjawi et al. (2021)
43 Korea (throughout the country) Children (< 9) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing COWP, SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum IIaA13G2R1, IIaA14G2R1, IIaA15G2R1 Ma et al. (2019a)
44 Lebanon Immunocompetent (1–88) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis (IdA19), C. parvum (IIaA15G1R1, IIaA15G2R1) Osman et al. (2015)
45 Lebanon (Tripoli) Colon and stomach adenocarcinoma, and immunocompetent qPCR SSU rRNA C. hominis, C. parvum N/I Osman et al. (2017)
46 Lebanon (Tripoli) Schoolchildren (3–16) Diarrhoea, abdominal pain, vomiting nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis (IaA18R3, IbA10G2), C. parvum (IIaA15G1R1) Osman et al. (2016)
47 Malaysia (Selangor, Kuala Lumpur, Kelantan) HIV patients (1–54) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. felis, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. parvum N/I Iqbal et al. (2015)
48 Myanmar (Shan) Inhabitants nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. andersoni, C. viatorum C. viatorum (XVcA2G1c) Wu et al. (2020)
49 Qatar (Doha) Children Diarrhoea qPCR, RFLP-PCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. parvum C. hominis (IbA9G3, IbA10G2), C. parvum (IIdA20G1, IIdA17G1, IIdA18G1, IIdA19G2, IIdA18G2, IIdA16G1, IIdA14G1) Boughattas et al. (2017)
50 Saudi Arabia (Makkah) Children (<14) Diarrhoea cPCR, RFLP-PCR SSU rRNA C. hominis, C. parvum N/I El-Malky et al. (2018)
51 Saudi Arabia (Belgarn) Food handlers (20–65) qPCR COWP C. parvum N/I Alqarni et al. (2022)
51 Syria (Damascus and Hama provinces) Children (<5 years) Diarrhoea nPCR, RFLP-PCR SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Kassouha et al. (2016)
53 Thailand (Bangkok) BAC nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Prasertbun et al. (2019)
54 Thailand (Bangkok, Nonthaburi) Adults (20–65) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. canis, C. felis, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. parvum, C. suis C. hominis (IeA11G3T3, IaA18R3, IaA19R3, IaA20R3, IaA16R3, IfA12G1, IbA9G3, IdA17, IdA11), C. parvum (IIoA16G1), C. meleagridis (IIIbA19G1R1, IIIbA20G1R1, IIIbA21G1R1b, IIIbA22G1R1c, IIIbA23G1R1b, IIIbA23G1Rc) Sannella et al. (2019)
55 Thailand (Suan Pheung) Children (6–11) nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. felis N/I Sutthikornchai et al. (2021)
56 Turkey (Denizli) BAC (0–87) Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Özkan and İça (2024)
57 Turkey (Van) Immunosuppressed and immunocompetent (0–65) Both diarrhoea and non-diarrhoea nPCR, RFLP-PCR, Sequencing COWP, gp60 C. parvum IIdA15G1, IIdA24G1, IIaA18G3R1, IIdA18G2 Ekici et al. (2022)
58 Turkey (Agri) Adults (mean age 25.86) Diarrhoea nPCR, RFLP-PCR COWP, gp60 C. parvum IIdA18G1, IIdA19G1, IIdA20G1 Aydemir et al. (2024)
59 Vietnam (Nam Dinh) Diarrhoea patients Diarrhoea nPCR, Sequencing COWP, SSU rRNA, gp60 C. canis, C. hominis C. hominis (IeA12G3T3) Iwashita et al. (2021)
Non-diarrhoea individuals C. canis N/I
60 Vietnam (Bac Giang) Biogas users nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. scrofarum N/I Nguyen et al. (2023)

Abbreviations: BAC, both adults and children; GIT, gastrointestinal tract; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; Hsp70, 70-kDa heat-shock protein gene; cPCR, conventional PCR; nPCR, nested PCR; qPCR, real-time PCR; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification; COWP, Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein; gp60, 60-kDa glycoprotein gene; SSU-rRNA, small subunit ribosomal RNA; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; N/I, not investigated.

3.4.2. Cryptosporidium spp. in Asian water resources

Non-molecular methods to detect Cryptosporidium sp. in water resources were used in 26.7% (12/45) of the studies, while molecular techniques were used in 44.4% (20/45). Thirteen studies (28.8%) combined both methods.

The Asian studies meticulously prepared water samples using various concentration techniques (sedimentation and filtration). The non-molecular methods employed wet mount examination (saline and iodine), mZN, ELISA, IFA, IMS-IFA, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The molecular methods employed in the analyzed studies comprised cPCR, nPCR, RFLP-PCR, and sequencing. The Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA was the most frequently targeted locus for molecular identification. Except for a single study that utilized the Hsp70 locus (Ehsan et al., 2015) for genotyping/subtyping, gp60 was the most targeted locus in the included studies.

In 20 genotyping studies focusing on water sources, a variety of Cryptosporidium species were identified, with four of these studies further extending their investigation to subtyping (Table 2). Certain species were exclusive within individual studies, including C. parvum, C. hominis, C. ryanae, and C. suis. Conversely, other studies documented multiple Cryptosporidium species, while some revealed the existence of mixed genotypes within single isolates.

Table 2.

Genotyping/subtyping analysis of Cryptosporidium species within Asian water resources.

No. Country (City) Type of water investigated Sampling volume (L) Molecular method Target gene Species Subtype Reference
1 Bangladesh (Mymensingh) SF (ponds) 15 nPCR SSU rRNA, Hsp70 C. andersoni, C. hominis N/I Ehsan et al. (2015)
2 China (Shanghai) WW (treatment plant) 30 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. baileyi, C. canis, C. felis, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. muris, C. parvum, Cryptosporidium rat genotype I, Cryptosporidium rat genotype IV, C. suis-like C. hominis and C. parvum (N/D), C. meleagridis (IIIbA22G1R1c) Ma et al. (2016)
3 China (Tianjin) SF (lakes) 20 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. andersoni, C. fragile, C. meleagridis, C. parvum, C. ubiquitum N/I Xiao et al. (2016)
4 China (Shanghai) WW (combined sewer overflow) 3 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. baileyi, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. muris, C. parvum, C. ubiquitum, C. viatorum C. hominis (IaA18R4, IbA19G2), C. parvum (IIdA19G1) Huang et al. (2017)
WW C. baileyi, C. felis, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. muris, C. parvum, Cryptosporidium rat genotype I, Cryptosporidium rat genotype IV, C. ubiquitum, C. viatorum C. hominis (IaA18R4, IbA19G2), C. parvum (IIdA19G1), C. ubiquitum (XIIg, XIIh), C. meleagridis (IIIbA22G1R1c), C. viatorum (XVaA6a)
5 China (Beijing) SwP 10 nPCR SSU rRNA C. hominis, C. parvum N/I Xiao et al. (2017)
6 China (Tianjin) SF (recreational lakes) 20 nPCR SSU rRNA C. andersoni, C. fragile, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. parvum, C. ubiquitum N/I Xiao et al. (2018)
7 China (Qinghai Tibetan Plateau Area) SF (river) 20 nPCR, sequencing SSU rRNA C. andersoni, C. hominis N/I Ma et al. (2019b)
MW (sewage and rivers) 20 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. andersoni, C. canis, C. hominis, C. parvum, C. struthionis N/I
8 China (Shanghai) WW 0.5–1.0 nPCR, RFLP PCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. parvum, Mixed (C. hominis + C. meleagridis), Mixed (C. hominis + C. meleagridis + C. parvum) C. hominis (IaA13R4, IaA14R4, IbA19G2, IdA19), C. meleagridis (IIIbA18G1R1, IIIbA21G1R1da, IIIbA24G1R1c) Jiang et al. (2020)
9 China (Guangzhou) WW (raw) 1 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. baileyi, C. felis, C. parvum, Cryptosporidium rat genotype IV C. parvum (IIdA15G1) Fan et al. (2021)
WW (treatment plants) C. baileyi, C. bovis, C. canis, C. felis, C. meleagridis, C. muris, C. occultus, C. parvum, Cryptosporidium rat genotype I, Cryptosporidium rat genotype IV, C. serpentis C. parvum (IIdA15G1)
10 China (Guiyang) SF (lakes) 0.5 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis, C. parvum C. hominis (IaA13R8, IeA11G3T3), C. parvum (IIpA9) Jia et al. (2022)
11 China (Shanghai) WW 0.6–0.8 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. hominis C. hominis (IdA14) Jiang et al. (2024)
12 India (Odisha) SF 20 nPCR SSU rRNA C. hominis N/I Daniels et al. (2015)
GW (deep)
GW (shallow)
DW
13 India (West Bengal) WW (farm water) 1–2 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, Hsp70 C. ryanae N/I Das et al. (2019)
14 Iran (Tehran) SF (river) 50 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. andersoni, C. canis, C. hominis, C. muris, C. parvum C. parvum (IId), C. hominis (Id) Mahmoudi et al. (2015)
15 Iran (Tehran) WW (raw) 5 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. andersoni, C. xiaoi N/I Hatam-Nahavandi et al. (2016)
16 Korea (Seoul, Gimhae, Daejeon) SF (lake, river, water intake plants) 40 nPCR SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Bahk et al. (2018)
17 Pakistan (Faisalabad) WW (sewage water) 5 nPCR SSU rRNA C. parvum N/I Abbas et al. (2022)
DW (municipal water)
SF (canal)
18 Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia MW (treated and untreated water) 0.015 sedimenta qPCR N/M C. parvum N/I Kumar et al. (2016)
19 Philippines (Rizal, Laguna, Metro Manila) SF (lake basin) 1 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. baileyi, C. galli, C. hominis, C. muris, C. parvum, Cryptosporidium rat genotype IV, C. suis N/I Dela Peña et al. (2021)
20 Vietnam (Hanam) SF (river) 5 nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. suis N/I Nguyen et al. (2016)
WW (sewage) 2
SF (pond) 5
SF (canal) 2

Abbreviations: DW, drinking water; GW, ground water; MW, mixed water; SwP, swimming pools; SF, surface water; WW, wastewater; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; nPCR, nested PCR; RFLP-PCR, restriction fragment length polymorphism-PCR; qPCR, real-time PCR; SSU rRNA, small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid; Hsp70, heat-shock protein 70 gene; gp60, 60-kDa glycoprotein gene; N/I, not investigated; N/M, not mentioned; N/D, not detected (An investigation was conducted; however, it did not succeed in identifying any subtypes).

a

The study did not specify the sample volume but noted that processing followed the U.S. EPA Methods 1622/1623.1.

The volume of water analyzed in the Asian studies ranged from 15ml to 50l (Table 2). The mean volumes of water examined varied across the different water categories as follows: DW (50ml to 20l), MW (20–161l), SF (500ml to 50l), SwP (8–50l), WW (500ml to 30l). The concentration of Cryptosporidium oocysts/l of water was assessed in 16 studies, with reported values ranging from 0 to 80,000 oocysts/l (Table 3). Notably, the highest oocyst concentration (80,000 oocysts/l) was reported in the Philippines in a mixed water source comprising tap water, spring water, and groundwater. Surface water constituted the second category with a high oocyst concentration in Nepal (126–794 oocysts/l).

Table 3.

The concentrations of Cryptosporidium oocysts per liter in Asian water resources.

No. Country (City) Type of water Oocyst concentrationa Reference
1 Armenia SF (river) 0.4–2.0 Shcherbakov et al. (2024)
2 Bangladesh (Mymensingh) SF (ponds) 0.02–1.1 Ehsan et al. (2015)
3 China (Shanghai) WW (treatment plants) 0–0.93 Ma et al. (2016)
4 China (Tianjin) SF (lake) 3.65 Xiao et al. (2016)
5 China (Xuzhou) SF (lake) 0–0.8 Kong et al. (2017)
6 China (Beijing) SwP 0.3 Xiao et al. (2017)
7 China (Guangzhou) SwP 0.03–0.14 Wei et al. (2018)
8 China (Tianjin) SF (recreational lake) 3.6 Xiao et al. (2018)
9 China (Guangzhou) SF (irrigation water) 0.1–0.2 Wei et al. (2019)
10 Korea (Seoul, Gimhae, Daejeon) SF (lake, river, water intake plants) 0–36.0 Bahk et al. (2018)
11 Lebanon (Shatila Refugee Camp in Beirut) DW (public and private wells, and municipal tap) 0–5.0 Khoury et al. (2016)
12 Malaysia (Sarawak) DW 0.02–0.06 Richard et al. (2016)
13 Nepal SF (river) 126–794 Tandukar et al. (2018)
14 Philippines (Manila) SF (pump) 0.1 Labana et al. (2018)
SF (river) 0.4
SF (creek) 0.8
15 Philippines (Laguna) MW (tap water, spring water, and groundwater) 80,000 Paller et al. (2022)
16 Philippines MW (treated and untreated water) 0.06 Kumar et al. (2016)
Malaysia 0.57
Thailand, 0.22

Abbreviations: DW, drinking water; MW, mixed water; SwP, swimming pools; SF, surface water; WW, wastewater.

a

Number of oocysts per liter.

3.4.3. Cryptosporidium spp. in Asian food resources

For detecting Cryptosporidium spp. in food resources, non-molecular methods were employed in 30% (3/10) of the studies, whereas molecular techniques were utilized in 50% (5/10). Two studies (20%) integrated non-molecular and molecular approaches.

The Asian studies under review employed meticulous methodologies for preparing food samples to detect Cryptosporidium oocysts. These techniques included washing, elution, and purification of the food matrices. Subsequently, purified oocysts underwent concentration via sedimentation and flotation procedures. The non-molecular methods employed were IFA and IMS-IFA. The Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA, COWP, and gp60 genes were the loci targeted for molecular identification.

In the six studies focusing on Cryptosporidium species in food (Table 4), C. parvum, C. andersoni, and C. suis were the species reported. Subtyping analysis was not successful for any of the Cryptosporidium species investigated in the included studies in food resources.

Table 4.

Molecular analysis of Cryptosporidium species within Asian food resources.

No. Country (City) Type of food investigated (specific material) Sample source Molecular method Target gene Speciesa Reference
1 China (Henan) Vegetables (Chinese chive) Farms and markets nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA, gp60 C. parvum Li et al. (2019)
2 China (Qinghai) Vegetables (Puha) Vendors nPCR SSU rRNA C. andersoni Li et al. (2020)
Vegetables (Chinese cabbage, Chinese chives, wild cabbage, lettuce, asparagus lettuce leaves, maize cobs peels, Romaine lettuce, amaranth) C. parvum
3 India (Chandigarh) Vegetables (fresh produce) Vendors and markets nPCR SSU rRNA, COWP C. parvum Utaaker et al. (2017)
4 Korea (Seoul) Vegetables (Perilla leaves, winter-grown cabbages, chives, sprouts, blueberries, cherry tomatoes) Fields qPCR, Sequencing Rad 16 ortholog gene C. parvum Sim et al. (2017)
5 Pakistan (Faisalabad) Vegetables (raw) Vendors and markets nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. parvum Abbas et al. (2022)
6 Vietnam (Hanam) Vegetables (leafy greens) Riverbanks nPCR, Sequencing SSU rRNA C. suis Nguyen et al. (2016)

Abbreviations: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; nPCR, nested PCR; qPCR, real-time PCR; SSU rRNA, small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid; COWP, Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein; gp60, 60-kDa glycoprotein gene.

a

Subtyping analysis was not successful for any of the Cryptosporidium species investigated in the studies included.

3.5. Frequencies of Cryptosporidium species in Asia

Twenty-three distinct species and four instances of mixed species infections were presented in different sources from humans, water, and food (Table 5). Mixed C. hominis + C. parvum and C. andersoni + C. muris infections were identified in the Asian population, and mixed C. hominis + C. meleagridis and C. hominis + C. parvum + C. meleagridis were identified within the Asian water sources (Table 5). Notably, C. parvum, C. hominis, and C. meleagridis were the common Cryptosporidium species identified across human and water sources, whereas C. parvum was the common species in food sources. Cryptosporidium parvum exhibited the highest prevalence across all three sources.

Table 5.

Frequencies of Cryptosporidium species in Asia across human populations, water sources, and food resources. Numbers in bold indicate the most frequent species per source.

No. Species No. of documented species per source
Total frequency
Humans Water Food
1 C. andersoni 5 7 1 13
2 C. baileyi 1 6 7
3 C. bovis 1 1
4 C. canis 4 4 8
5 C. suis 3 3 1 7
6 C. felis 7 4 11
7 C. serpentis 1 1
8 C. muris 6 6
9 C. meleagridis 8 7 15
10 C. parvum 51 16 5 72
11 C. hominis 32 14 46
12 C. fragile 2 2
13 C. ubiquitum 1 4 5
14 Cryptosporidium rat genotype IV 4 4
15 C. occultus 1 1 2
16 C. galli 1 1
17 Cryptosporidium rat genotype I 3 3
18 C. xiaoi 1 1
19 C. ryanae 1 1 2
20 C. struthionis 1 1
21 C. viatorum 5 1 6
22 C. culuculus 1 1
23 C. scrofarum 1 1
1-M C. hominis + C. meleagridis 1 1
2-M C. hominis + C. meleagridis + C. parvum 1 1
3-M C. hominis + C. parvum 1 1
4-M C. andersoni + C. muris 1 1
Total number of species per source 14 21 3

Abbreviation: M, mixed species.

The Asian human population, was found to be infected with 14 different Cryptosporidium species (Table 5). Various Asian water sources were found to be contaminated with 21 different Cryptosporidium species. Based on the frequency of their documentation across the included studies, the most common species, presented in descending order, were C. parvum, C. hominis, followed by equal presentation of C. meleagridis and C. andersoni (Table 5). Different Asian food resources were contaminated with three Cryptosporidium species (Table 5), with C. parvum being the most frequently identified species (Table 5).

3.6. Frequencies of Cryptosporidium subtypes in Asia

Subtyping analyses were conducted within the Asian population and water resources. Six Cryptosporidium species and their reported gp60 subtypes families were examined (Table 6): C. parvum (6 subtypes), C. hominis (5 subtypes), C. meleagridis (3 subtypes), C. ubiquitum (2 subtypes), C. felis (1 subtype), and C. viatorum (1 subtype).

Table 6.

Frequencies of Cryptosporidium gp60 subtype families in Asia across human populations and water sources. Numbers in bold indicate the most frequent subtype per source.

Species Subtype family No. of documented subtype families per source
Total frequency
Humans Water
C. hominis Ia 18 4 22
Ib 11 3 14
Id 6 3 9
Ie 5 1 6
If 3 3
C. parvum IIa 28 28
IIc 2 2
IId 27 5 32
IIe 2 2
IIo 1 1
IIp 1 1
C. meleagridis IIIb 9 3 12
IIIe 1 1
IIIg 1 1
C. ubiquitum XIIg 1 1
XIIh 1 1
C. felis XI 1 1
C. viatorum XV 3 1 4

Within the Asian population, 15 Cryptosporidium gp60 subtype families were identified. The most prevalent Cryptosporidium subtype families were C. parvum IIa and C. parvum IId, with a near-equal reporting frequency of 28 and 27 studies, respectively, followed by C. hominis subtypes Ia and Ib (Table 6).

Various Asian water resources were found to be contaminated with subtypes of nine distinct Cryptosporidium families. Among these, C. parvum IId, C. hominis Ia, and C. meleagridis IIIb were the most frequently encountered subtypes.

It is noteworthy that the following Cryptosporidium subtype families were shared between human populations and water resources in Asia, presented in descending order of frequency: C. parvum IId, C. hominis Ia, C. meleagridis IIIb, and C. parvum Ib, Id, and Ie (Table 6).

4. Discussion

The present review offers insights into the prevalence and distribution of Cryptosporidium species in human populations, water sources, and food resources across the Asian continent in the past decade.

Our analysis indicated the overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Asia to be 8.1% between 2015 and 2025, aligning with a systematic review and meta-analysis encompassing the global population, in which the estimated pooled prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection was 7.6% (Dong et al., 2020). The overall Cryptosporidium prevalence per Asian region demonstrated the highest prevalence proportion in the Southeast Asia and the absence of Central Asia representation. However, such an interpretation should consider the number of studies and the sample size associated with each region. The Southeast Asia region is acknowledged as an “epicenter” for emerging infectious diseases. The tropical and subtropical climate of Southeast Asia, characterized by high humidity and frequent rainfall, creates favorable conditions for the survival and transmission of Cryptosporidium oocysts in the environment. In many parts of the region, rapid urbanization and population growth induced inadequate sanitation infrastructure and limited access to clean water, facilitating faecal-oral transmission, particularly in densely populated or low-resource settings. Furthermore, the region’s diagnostic limitations, noting that many countries of Southeast Asia lack access to sensitive molecular tools, leading to underreporting and insufficient understanding of species distribution and transmission dynamics (Lim and Vythilingam, 2013, Lim et al., 2013; Bordier and Roger, 2013; Hashim and Hashim, 2016; Lan et al., 2016; Utami et al., 2020).

The considerable variation in Cryptosporidium prevalence across Asian countries, from 0% in Taiwan to 58% in Iraq, is largely influenced by environmental and infrastructural factors, such as poor sanitation, limited access to clean water, inadequate sewage systems, and population displacement from political conflicts. Additionally, differences in diagnostic methods, where molecular techniques detect more cases than traditional tests, along with variations in study populations, public health surveillance, sample size, study design, and sociocultural practices, might also impact prevalence estimates in the wide area of the Asian continent.

The available data in the present study might be affected by a geographical bias, as a disproportionate number of studies have been conducted in certain countries, notably Taiwan (one study) and China (37 studies), while limited research is available from other regions, particularly Central Asia. This under- or over-representation may skew the pooled prevalence estimates and limit the generalizability of the results to the broader region. Such an imbalance highlights the need for more epidemiological studies in underexplored regions to obtain a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence across Asia.

Significant surges in Cryptosporidium spp. detection observed in 2019 and 2024 cannot be attributed to an increase in the overall number of studies. Rather, these spikes stemmed from a higher proportion of research focused on human subjects, accounting for 79.1% (19/24) of studies in 2019 and 87% (20/23) in 2024. The volume of research conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic (2015–2019) and after it (2020–2025) appears relatively consistent. However, it is important to highlight that the prevalence recorded in 2024 surpassed that of 2019. The observed rise in human cases may be attributed to the broader application of molecular diagnostic techniques, as well as an increase in the number of parasitological stool examinations that include the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. In Europe, the growing number of reported cases is largely associated with enhanced detection efforts, rather than an actual increase in prevalence, which appears to remain stable. This trend reinforces the urgency of expanding research on this water-borne protozoan parasite.

The pooled prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in the Asian population stands at a modest 5.9%, significantly trailing behind Africa’s 21–50% and the Americas’ 9–21% (Jann et al., 2022; Omolabi et al., 2022; Ahmed et al., 2023). This lower rate is likely reflected by the data collected over just the past decade, highlighting regional differences in infection patterns across continents.

This review underscores that Cryptosporidium spp. infection predominantly affects individuals with compromised immune systems (8.0%), such as those living with HIV, cancer patients, organ transplant recipients, and individuals affected by COVID-19, corroborating findings from earlier research in Asia (Mahmoudi et al., 2017). Worldwide estimates reveal a prevalence ranging from 11% to 14% among HIV-positive populations, with rates reaching up to 25% in certain African regions, largely influenced by hygiene-related factors (Wang et al., 2018b; Ahmadpour et al., 2020; Omolabi et al., 2022). Among organ transplant recipients, infection rates are approximately 15% (Ahmed et al., 2024). The immune competence of the host plays a pivotal role in determining the severity and prognosis of cryptosporidiosis, which can be severe, prolonged, and occasionally fatal in these vulnerable groups (Ryan et al., 2016; Semmani et al., 2023).

Cryptosporidium oocysts have been detected at high levels in surface water across Asia in the last decade, with an overall prevalence of 20.3%, aligning with the 45.3% global prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. based on water type (Daraei et al., 2021). This widespread presence highlights growing concerns over surface water quality and safety, given its vulnerability to environmental contamination and its crucial role in supporting human and ecological needs. Surface waters are particularly susceptible to contamination from sewage discharges and agricultural runoffs, where livestock proximity to water sources, intensive farming practices, and manure application on fields led to the high rates of water-borne cryptosporidiosis (Bourli et al., 2023).

It is alarming that Cryptosporidium contamination in Asian drinking water reaches a prevalence of 8.9%; such a level indicates the potential for widespread and severe water-borne transmission, posing a critical public health threat. Cryptosporidium spp. are resilient parasites that can cause severe diarrheal illness, especially in vulnerable populations like children, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Contaminated drinking water serves as a primary infection source, leading to outbreaks and sustained transmission. Cryptosporidium spp. has been identified as the leading cause of 1227 reported water-borne outbreaks (Karanis et al., 2007; Efstratiou et al., 2017; Rosado-García et al., 2017; Bourli et al., 2023). This high contamination rate reflects inadequate water treatment and sanitation infrastructure, increasing the risk of large-scale infections and associated morbidity and mortality across communities. Immediate interventions are therefore essential to ensure safe drinking water and prevent further health crises.

Cryptosporidium contamination in Asian countries has been detected in various food matrices, including fruits and fresh produce, with a prevalence reaching 5.6%. Cryptosporidium is recognized as one of the top ten food-borne pathogens by the FoodNet surveillance programme in the USA (Crim et al., 2014; Ali et al., 2024), and cryptosporidiosis is recognised as the second most significant food-borne illness in western and northern Europe (Robertson et al., 2015; Bouwknegt et al., 2018; Ali et al., 2024). Globally, there have been 67 reported food-borne outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis (Ahmed and Karanis, 2018; Zahedi and Ryan, 2020). Contamination often occurs during food processing, with oocysts adhering to the moist surfaces of fruits and vegetables, posing ongoing risks to food safety (Ryan et al., 2018; Ali et al., 2024).

Surprisingly, food samples from markets exhibited a significantly higher Cryptosporidium prevalence of 9.3% compared to 3.0% in vendor-sourced foods. However, Egger’s test revealed a publication bias, likely influenced by the large disparity in sample sizes between these groups. The increased contamination in markets may stem from more complex handling, extended storage, and transportation processes, which elevate the risk of food contamination with oocysts. Markets also consolidate produce from diverse origins, heightening cross-contamination potential, particularly where hygiene standards are inconsistent. Conversely, vendors typically manage smaller quantities with shorter supply chains, possibly reducing contamination risks. Additionally, market environments, especially in densely populated or poorly regulated areas, may lack rigorous sanitation, further contributing to the higher prevalence observed.

In the present review, non-molecular methods were more commonly employed than molecular techniques for detecting Cryptosporidium spp. in Asian studies, in agreement with microscopy being the predominant approach in South and Central America, while equal use of microscopy and molecular diagnostics was shown for North America (Jann et al., 2022).

A clear predominance of C. parvum (subtype families IIa and IId) and C. hominis (subtype families Ia and Ib) was observed across the Asian population and regional water sources, while C. parvum appears more frequently in food. This pattern aligns with global trends, where C. parvum and C. hominis remain the most prevalent species infecting humans (Feng et al., 2018; Ryan et al., 2021b), and mirrors previous findings from Asia (Mahmoudi et al., 2017). In the MENA region, C. parvum and C. hominis were consistently identified across nearly all studies (Ben Ayed et al., 2024). Cryptosporidium hominis is the predominant species responsible for water-borne cryptosporidiosis outbreaks worldwide (Bourli et al., 2023), whereas food-borne outbreaks are more commonly linked to C. parvum, reflecting its strong zoonotic transmission potential (Zahedi et al., 2020; Ali et al., 2024). This distinction highlights the differing epidemiological dynamics of each transmission route.

The concurrent presence of C. parvum and C. hominis in the Asian population, as well as in food and water sources, reveals a complex interplay between anthroponotic and zoonotic transmission pathways. Cryptosporidium hominis predominance highlights human-to-human transmission and points to sewage-related contamination, especially in water-borne outbreaks (Robertson et al., 2020), while C. parvum frequently linked to livestock signals environmental contamination through agricultural practices and inadequate sanitation. The detection of C. parvum in both food and water emphasizes the fragility of public health infrastructure in densely populated or resource-limited regions, presenting a substantial risk for widespread outbreaks. Supporting this concern, out of 40 reported cryptosporidiosis outbreaks in the past decade, 27 were linked to water and only 13 to food contamination, reinforcing the greater vulnerability of water systems (Zahedi and Ryan, 2020; Ali et al., 2024). This disparity is likely due to the under-ascertainment of food-borne outbreaks, which are considerably more difficult to identify and monitor. Water sources generally serve a defined population, making outbreak detection and tracing more straightforward. In contrast, contaminated food products often have variable distribution, and only certain individuals, depending on their dietary habits, may be exposed. Moreover, fresh produce is typically no longer available by the time clinical cases are recognized, and investigations begin. In comparison, water may still be accessible for testing or, if contamination is persistent, continue to pose an ongoing threat.

The detection of an exceptionally high concentration of Cryptosporidium oocysts, 80,000 oocysts/l in a mixed water source in the Philippines, alongside elevated levels in Nepalese surface water (126–794 oocysts/l) (Paller et al., 2022) underscores a critical public health concern. One of the studies conducted in the Philippines (Masangkay et al., 2020) has similarly reported a high oocyst density using a comparable low-volume approach (50ml), thereby reinforcing the validity of the findings. While the low-volume approach may raise methodological concerns, it was justified by contextual relevance, specifically, the realistic risk of human accidental ingestion and/or inhalation of small volumes of Cryptosporidium-contaminated water. This approach was further supported by the application of robust diagnostic techniques (e.g. immunofluorescence, fluorescence microscopy, modified Kinyoun’s, and modified safranin methylene blue staining), which produced consistent and reproducible results, complemented by PCR and sequencing. Furthermore, sampling sites were selected based on inclusion criteria that strongly indicated potential contamination. The previous findings reflect widespread environmental contamination across interconnected water supplies, likely stemming from untreated human and animal waste. The presence of oocysts in treated tap water suggests systemic failures in water treatment infrastructure or post-treatment contamination. This scenario is particularly alarming given the extremely low infectious dose of Cryptosporidium spp., resistance to conventional disinfection methods, prolonged environmental persistence, and the limited availability of reliable diagnostic tools, heightening the risk of large-scale outbreaks, especially among immunocompromised individuals. Furthermore, the mixing of water sources complicates contamination control and points to significant gaps in sanitation, water management, and infrastructure.

The observed prevalence patterns of Cryptosporidium in humans, water, and food resources have important implications for public health strategies across the Asian region. The high burden in several countries, particularly where sanitation and water quality control are insufficient, highlights the need for targeted interventions. Enhancing water treatment systems, enforcing stricter food safety protocols, and increasing access to sensitive diagnostic methods such as routine species-level surveillance are essential measures for reducing transmission. Additionally, integrating routine Cryptosporidium screening into existing public health surveillance frameworks could facilitate early detection and prompt response to outbreaks. These findings support the development of context-specific policies aimed at mitigating the impact of Cryptosporidium spp. on vulnerable populations, especially children and immunocompromised individuals.

5. Conclusions

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the prevalence, distribution, and transmission dynamics of Cryptosporidium spp. across Asia over the past decade. The findings highlight significant regional/country disparities in infection rates, with Southeast Asia emerging as a hotspot due to its climate, sanitation challenges, and diagnostic limitations. The predominance of C. hominis and C. parvum across human, water, and food samples indicates a complex interplay of anthroponotic and zoonotic transmission routes. Notably, the detection of alarmingly high oocyst concentrations in drinking and surface water, as well as contamination in fresh produce, underscores the fragility of public health and water safety infrastructures in many Asian countries. Vulnerable groups, particularly immunocompromised individuals, face heightened risks, with prevalence estimates reflecting this concern. The reliance on non-molecular diagnostic methods also points to a critical need for improved surveillance and species-level identification, which can guide future research and interventions. Altogether, these findings call for urgent, coordinated, and multisectoral interventions focused on improving water and food safety, enhancing diagnostic capabilities, and strengthening public health systems to effectively monitor, control, and prevent cryptosporidiosis across the continent.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Shahira Abdelaziz Ali Ahmed: Data curation, Visualization, Investigation, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Sonia Boughattas: Data curation, Validation, Visualization, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi: Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Huma Khan: Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Simuzar Mamedova: Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Ardra Namboodiri: Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Frederick R. Masangkay: Visualization, Investigation, Data curation, Validation, Writing - review & editing. Panagiotis Karanis: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing - review & editing.

Funding

This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2025.100311.

Contributor Information

Shahira Abdelaziz Ali Ahmed, Email: shahira_ahmed@med.suez.edu.eg.

Panagiotis Karanis, Email: karanis.p@unic.ac.cy.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (498.9KB, pdf)
Multimedia component 2
mmc2.xlsx (48.4KB, xlsx)

Data availability

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its supplementary files.

References

  1. Abbas Z., Khan M.K., Abbas R.Z., Sindhu Z.U.D., Sajid M.S., Munir A., et al. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia in different water bodies, soil, and vegetables in Pakistan. Health Secur. 2022;20:308–320. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmadpour E., Safarpour H., Xiao L., Zarean M., Hatam-Nahavandi K., Barac A., et al. Cryptosporidiosis in HIV-positive patients and related risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasite. 2020;27:27. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2020025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed S.A., Flórez M.G., Karanis P. The impact of water crises and climate changes on the transmission of protozoan parasites in Africa. Pathog. Glob. Health. 2018;112:281–293. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2018.1523778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed S.A., Karanis P. An overview of methods/techniques for the detection of Cryptosporidium in food samples. Parasitol. Res. 2018;117:629–653. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5735-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmed S.A., Kotepui M., Masangkay F.R., Milanez G.D., Karanis P. Gastrointestinal parasites in Africa: A review. Adv. Parasitol. 2023;119:1–64. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2022.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmed S.A., Quattrocchi A., Karanis P. Cryptosporidium sp. infection in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathog. Glob. Health. 2024;118:305–316. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2023.2290379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Alegbeleye O.O., Singleton I., Sant’Ana A.S. Sources and contamination routes of microbial pathogens to fresh produce during field cultivation: A review. Food Microbiol. 2018;73:177–208. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ali M., Ji Y., Xu C., Hina Q., Javed U., Li K. Food and waterborne cryptosporidiosis from a One Health perspective: A comprehensive review. Animals. 2024;14:3287. doi: 10.3390/ani14223287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Alqarni A.S., Wakid M.H., Gattan H.S. Prevalence, type of infections and comparative analysis of detection techniques of intestinal parasites in the province of Belgarn, Saudi Arabia. PeerJ. 2022;10 doi: 10.7717/peerj.13889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Aydemir S., Barlık F., Ekici A., Barlık D.H., Alkan S., Gürbüz E., Yılmaz H. Molecular characterization of Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. detected in humans in Ağrı, Türkiye. Iran J. Parasitol. 2024;19:1. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v19i1.15188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bagci O., Guldaval F., Muftuoglu C., Mert U., Serce Unat D., Unat O.S., Polat G., Toz S., Caner A., et al. A pilot study on the evaluation of Cryptosporidium infection in patients with lung cancer: Respiratory cryptosporidiosis. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2022;75:569–574. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2022.288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bahadorizadeh L., Khanaliha K., Ghorbandoust S., Bokharei-Salim F., Minaeian S., Khodakarim N., et al. Prevalence and molecular identification of protozoan intestinal parasitic infections in cancer patients and a control group. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024;24:1. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10235-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bahk Y.Y., Cho P.Y., Ahn S.K., Park S., Jheong W.H., Park Y.K., et al. Monitoring of noxious protozoa for management of natural water resources. Kor. J. Parasitol. 2018;56:205–210. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2018.56.2.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bahrami F., Haghighi A., Zamini G., Khademerfan M. Zoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium and microsporidia in individuals of the Kurdistan Province, west of Iran. J. Parasitol. 2020;106 doi: 10.1645/18-99. 464-464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Baldursson S., Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks – an update 2004–2010. Water Res. 2011;45:6603–6614. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bekturganov Z., Tussupova K., Berndtsson R., Sharapatova N., Aryngazin K., Zhanasova M. Water-related health problems in Central Asia – a review. Water. 2016;8:219. doi: 10.3390/w8060219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ben Ayed L.B., Ahmed S.A.A., Boughattas S., Karanis P. Waterborne Cryptosporidium species and Giardia duodenalis in resources of MENA: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Water Health. 2024;22:1491–1515. doi: 10.2166/wh.2024.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Beuchat L.R. Ecological factors influencing survival and growth of human pathogens on raw fruits and vegetables. Microb. Infect. 2002;4:413–423. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01555-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bordier M., Roger F. Zoonoses in South-East Asia: A regional burden, a global threat. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2013;14:40–67. doi: 10.1017/S1466252313000017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Boughattas S., Behnke J.M., Al-Ansari K., Sharma A., Abu-Alainin W., Al-Thani A., Abu-Madi M.A. Molecular analysis of the enteric protozoa associated with acute diarrhea in hospitalized children. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:343. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bourli P., Eslahi A.V., Tzoraki O., Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: A review of worldwide outbreaks – an update 2017–2022. J. Water Health. 2023;21:1421–1447. doi: 10.2166/wh.2023.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bouwknegt M., Devleesschauwer B., Graham H., Robertson L.J., van der Giessen J.W.B. Prioritisation of food-borne parasites in Europe, 2016. Euro Surveill. 2018;23:17–161. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.9.17-00161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bouzid M., Hunter P.R., Chalmers R.M., Tyler K.M. Cryptosporidium pathogenicity and virulence. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013;26:115–134. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00076-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chalmers R.M., Davies A.P. Minireview: Clinical cryptosporidiosis. Exp. Parasitol. 2010;124:138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Checkley W., White A.C., Jaganath D., Arrowood M.J., Chalmers R.M., Chen X.M., et al. A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for Cryptosporidium. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2015;15:85–94. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70772-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Crim S.M., Iwamoto M., Huang J.Y., Griffin P.M., Gilliss D., Cronquist A.B., et al. Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food - Foodborne Diseases active surveillance network, 10 US sites, 2006–2013. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2014;63:328–332. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5779392/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Daniels M.E., Shrivastava A., Smith W.A., Sahu P., Odagiri M., Misra P.R., et al. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in humans, domestic animals, and village water sources in rural India. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015;93:596–600. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Daraei H., Oliveri Conti G., Sahlabadi F., Thai V.N., Gholipour S., Turki H., et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in water: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021;28:9498–9507. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11261-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Das K., Nair L.V., Ghosal A., Sardar S.K., Dutta S., Ganguly S. Genetic characterization reveals evidence for an association between water contamination and zoonotic transmission of a Cryptosporidium sp. from dairy cattle in West Bengal, India. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019;17 doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dela Peña L.B.R.O., Vejano M.R.A., Rivera W.L. Molecular surveillance of Cryptosporidium spp. for microbial source tracking of fecal contamination in Laguna Lake, Philippines. J. Water Health. 2021;19:534–544. doi: 10.2166/wh.2021.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dong S., Yang Y., Wang Y., Yang D., Yang Y., Shi Y., et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in the global population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Parasitol. 2020;65:882–889. doi: 10.2478/s11686-020-00230-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dupuy F., Valot S., Dalle F., Sterin A., L'Ollivier C. Disseminated Cryptosporidium infection in an infant with CD40L deficiency. IDCases. 2021;24 doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Efstratiou A., Ongerth J.E., Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks – an update 2011–2016. Wat. Res. 2017;114:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ehsan A.M., Geurden T., Casaert S., Parvin S.M., Islam T.M., Ahmed U.M., et al. Assessment of zoonotic transmission of Giardia and Cryptosporidium between cattle and humans in rural villages in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ekici A., Unlu A.H., Aydemir S., Barlik F., Yilmaz H. Subtyping of Cryptosporidium parvum obtained from humans and calves in Van, Turkey. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2022;17:3. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v17i3.10627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. El-Malky M.M., Mowafy N.M., Zaghloul D.A., Al-Harthi S.A., El-Bali M.A., Mohamed R.T., et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species isolated from diarrheic children in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Trop. Biomed. 2018;35:76–81. https://www.msptm.org/files/Vol35No1/76-81-EL-Malky-MM.pdf [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Eslahi A.V., Mamedova S., Nassiba R., Karanis P. Unveiling risks in healthy food: Vegetables and fruits are linked to the distribution chain of protozoan parasites. Food Microbiol. 2024;123 doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Esteghamati A., Khanaliha K., Bokharaei-Salim F., Sayyahfar S., Ghaderipour M. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in cancer, organ transplant and primary immunodeficiency patients in Tehran, Iran. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2019;20:495–501. doi: 10.31557/apjcp.2019.20.2.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fan Y., Wang X., Yang R., Zhao W., Li N., Guo Y., et al. Molecular characterization of the waterborne pathogens Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Cyclospora cayetanensis and Eimeria spp. in wastewater and sewage in Guangzhou, China. Parasites Vectors. 2021;14:66. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04566-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Feng Y., Ryan U.M., Xiao L. Genetic diversity and population structure of Cryptosporidium. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34:997–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fewtrell L., Kay D. Recreational water and infection: A review of recent findings. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2015;2:85–94. doi: 10.1007/s40572-014-0036-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gallas-Lindemann C., Sotiriadou I., Plutzer J., Noack M.J., Mahmoudi M.R., Karanis P. Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. dissemination during wastewater treatment and comparative detection via immunofluorescence assay (IFA), nested polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) and loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) Acta Trop. 2016;158:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gallas-Lindemann C., Sotiriadou I., Plutzer J., Karanis P. Prevalence and distribution of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in wastewater and the surface, drinking and ground waters in the Lower Rhine, Germany. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012;141:9–21. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812002026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ghafari R., Rafiei A., Tavalla M., Choghakabodi P.M., Nashibi R., Rafiei R. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species isolated from HIV/AIDS patients in southwest of Iran. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018;56:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ghoshal U., Kalra S.K., Tejan N., Ranjan P., Dey A., Nityanand S. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium and microsporidia infecting hematological malignancy patients. Acta Parasitol. 2020;66:508–516. doi: 10.1007/s11686-020-00307-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Golomazou E., Mamedova S., Eslahi A.V., Karanis P. Cryptosporidium and agriculture: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;916 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Guérin A., Striepen B. The biology of the intestinal intracellular parasite Cryptosporidium. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:509–515. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Guo W., Xue X., Li R., Liang R., Wang Z., Qin J., et al. Epidemiological investigation of Cryptosporidium in children with diarrhea in middle Inner Mongolia, China. Acta Trop. 2024;254 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hao Y., Liu A., Li H., Zhao Y., Yao L., Yang B., et al. Molecular characterization and zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardiaduodenalis in humans and domestic animals in Heilongjiang Province, China. Parasites Vectors. 2024;17:155. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06219-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hashim J.H., Hashim Z. Climate change, extreme weather events, and human health implications in the Asia Pacific Region. Asia Pac. J. Publ. Health. 2016;28(Suppl. 2):8S–14S. doi: 10.1177/1010539515599030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hatam-Nahavandi K., Mohebali M., Mahvi A.H., Keshavarz H., Najafian H.R., Mirjalali H., et al. Microscopic and molecular detection of Cryptosporidium andersoni and Cryptosporidium xiaoi in wastewater samples of Tehran Province, Iran. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2016;11:499–506. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28127361/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hijjawi N., Mukbel R., Yang R., Ryan U. Genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in animal and human isolates from Jordan. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;228:116–120. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hijjawi N., Zahedi A., Kazaleh M., Ryan U. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species and subtypes in paediatric oncology and non-oncology patients with diarrhoea in Jordan. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017;55:127–130. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hijjawi N., Zahedi A., Ryan U. Molecular characterization of Entamoeba, Blastocystis and Cryptosporidium species in stool samples collected from Jordanian patients suffering from gastroenteritis. Tropenmed. Parasitol. 2021;11:122–125. doi: 10.4103/tp.tp_106_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Huang C., Hu Y., Wang L., Wang Y., Li N., Guo Y., et al. Environmental transport of emerging human-pathogenic Cryptosporidium species and subtypes through combined sewer overflow and wastewater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;83 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00682-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hussain G., Roychoudhury S., Singha B., Paul J. Incidence of Cryptosporidium andersoni in diarrheal patients from southern Assam, India: A molecular approach. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017;36:1023–1032. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2887-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Iqbal A., Sim B.L.H., Dixon B.R., Surin J., Lim Y.A.L. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in HIV/AIDS patients in Malaysia. Trop. Biomed. 2015;32:310–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Iwashita H., Takemura T., Tokizawa A., Sugamoto T., Thiem V.D., Nguyen T.H., et al. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. in an agricultural area of northern Vietnam: A community survey. Parasitol. Int. 2021;83 doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2021.102341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Izadi S., Mohaghegh M.A., Ghayour-Najafabadi Z., Azami M., Mirzaei F., Namdar F., et al. Frequency and molecular identification of Cryptosporidium species among immunocompromised patients referred to hospitals, Central Iran, 2015–2016. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2020;15:31–39. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32489373 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Jann H.W., Cabral-Castro M.J., Costa J.V.B., Alencar A.C.M.B., Peralta J.M., Peralta R.H.S. Prevalence of human cryptosporidiosis in the Americas: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo. 2022;64:e70. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202264070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Jia R., Wen X., Guo Y., Xiao L., Feng Y., Li N. Decline in Cryptosporidium infection in free-ranging rhesus monkeys in a park after public health interventions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.901766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Jiang W., Roellig D.M., Li N., Wang L., Guo Y., Feng Y., Xiao L. Contribution of hospitals to the occurrence of enteric protists in urban wastewater. Parasitol. Res. 2020;119:3033–3040. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06834-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Jiang Y., Liu L., Yuan Z., Liu A., Cao J., Shen Y. Molecular identification and genetic characteristics of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients in Shanghai, China. Parasites Vectors. 2023;16:53. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05666-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Jiang Y., Yuan Z., Wang Y., Zhang J., Shen Y., Cao J. Wastewater-based intestinal protozoa monitoring in Shanghai, China. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024;12 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04032-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Karanis P., Kourenti C., Smith H. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: A worldwide review of outbreaks and lessons learnt. J. Water Health. 2007;5:1–38. doi: 10.2166/wh.2006.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Karim M.R., Li J., Harun A.B., Rume F.I., Zhang L. Molecular characterization and zoonotic risk assessment of Cryptosporidium spp. in children and calves in Bangladesh. One Health. 2024;18 doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kassouha M., Soukkarieh C., Alkhaled A. First genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in pre-weaned calves, broiler chickens and children in Syria by PCR-RFLP analysis. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;225:86–90. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kattula D., Jeyavelu N., Prabhakaran A.D., Premkumar P.S., Velusamy V., Venugopal S., et al. Natural history of cryptosporidiosis in a birth cohort in southern India. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016;64:347–354. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Khalil S., Mirdha B.R., Panda A., Singh Y., Makharia G., Paul J. Cryptosporidium species subtypes and associated clinical manifestations in Indian patients. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench. 2017;10:311–318. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29379597 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Khoury S., Graczyk T., Burnham G., Goldman L. Drinking water system treatment and contamination in Shatila Refugee Camp in Beirut, Lebanon. East Mediterr. Health J. 2016;22:568–578. doi: 10.26719/2016.22.8.568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kong Y., Lu P., Yuan T., Niu J., Li Z., Yang B. Cryptosporidium contamination and attributed risks in Yunlong Lake in Xuzhou, China. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2017;2017:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2017/4819594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Korpe P.S., Haque R., Gilchrist C., Valencia C., Niu F., Lu M., et al. Natural history of cryptosporidiosis in a longitudinal study of slum-dwelling Bangladeshi children: Association with severe malnutrition. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kumar T., Majid M.A.A., Onichandran S., Jaturas N., Andiappan H., Salibay C.C., et al. Presence of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia in water samples from Southeast Asia: Towards an integrated water detection system. Infect. Dis. Poverty. 2016;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0095-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Labana R.V., Dungca J.Z., Nissapatorn V. Community-based surveillance of Cryptosporidium in the indigenous community of Boliwong, Philippines, from April to December 2017. Epidemiol. Health. 2018;40 doi: 10.4178/epih.e2018047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lan G.L., Yuan Z.K., Clements-Nolle K.D., Cook A., Yuan L.L., Xu Q.Y., et al. Social capital and quality of life among people living with HIV/AIDS in Southeast China. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. 2016;28:325–335. doi: 10.1177/1010539516641490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lee S.H., VanBik D., Kim H.Y., Lee Y.-R., Kim J.W., Chae M., Kwak D. Multilocus typing of Cryptosporidium spp. in young calves with diarrhea in Korea. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;229:81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Li J., Ren Y., Chen H., Huang W., Feng X., Hu W. Risk evaluation of pathogenic intestinal protozoa infection among laboratory macaques, animal facility workers, and nearby villagers from One Health perspective. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.696568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li J., Shi K., Sun F., Li T., Wang R., Zhang S., Jian F., Ning C., Zhang L. Identification of human pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Cyclospora cayetanensis, and Cryptosporidium parvum on the surfaces of vegetables and fruits in Henan, China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019;307 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Li X., Zhang X., Jian Y., Wang G., Ma L., Schou C., Karanis P. Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in vegetables from street markets from the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau Area in China. Parasitol. Res. 2020;119:1847–1855. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06661-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lim Y.A.L., Mahdy M.A.K., Surin J. In: Parasites and Their Vectors. A Special Focus on Southeast Asia. Lim Y.A.L., Vythilingam I., editors. Springer; Vienna: 2013. Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Southeast Asia; pp. 77–102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lim Y.A.L., Nissapatorn V. Transmission of waterborne parasites in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): Overview and direction forward. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2017;8–9:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Lim Y.A.L., Vythilingam I. In: Parasites and Their Vectors. A Special Focus on Southeast Asia. Lim Y.A.L., Vythilingam I., editors. Springer; Vienna: 2013. Southeast Asia: Hotspot for parasitic infections.https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-7091-1553-4 [Google Scholar]
  83. Ma D., Lee M., Hong S., Cho S., Lee S. Molecular prevalence and genotypes of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis in patients with acute diarrhea in Korea, 2013–2016. Kor. J. Parasitol. 2019;57:531–536. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2019.57.5.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Ma J., Feng Y., Hu Y., Villegas E.N., Xiao L. Human infective potential of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in urban wastewater treatment plant effluents. J. Water Health. 2016;14:411–423. doi: 10.2166/wh.2016.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ma L., Zhang X., Jian Y., Li X., Wang G., Hu Y., Karanis P. Detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in the slaughterhouse, sewage and river waters of the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau Area (QTPA), China. Parasitol. Res. 2019;118:2041–2051. doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06330-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Madadi S., Mahami-Oskouei M., Rafeey M., Spotin A., Aminisani N., Mahami-Oskouei L., et al. Comparative evaluation of Cryptosporidium infection in malnourished and well-nourished children: Parasitic infections are affected by the interaction of nutritional status and socio-demographic characteristics. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020;68 doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.101406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mahmoudi M.R., Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad E., Kazemi B., Haghighi A., Mirzaei A., Mohammadiha A., et al. Cryptosporidium genotypes and subtypes distribution in river water in Iran. J. Water Health. 2015;13:600–606. doi: 10.2166/wh.2014.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Mahmoudi M.R., Ongerth J.E., Karanis P. Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis: The Asian perspective. Int. J. Hyg Environ. Health. 2017;220:1098–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Mamedova S., Karanis P. Cryptosporidium spp. infections in livestock and wild animals in Azerbaijan territory. J. Water Health. 2021;19:545–562. doi: 10.2166/wh.2021.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Masangkay F.R., Milanez G.D., Somsak V., Kotepui M., Tangpong J., Karanis P. Multi-spatial contamination of environmental aquatic matrices with Cryptosporidium: A climate, health, and regulatory framework for the Philippines. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2020;32:121. doi: 10.1186/s12302-020-00410-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  91. Maxamhud S., Shahiduzzaman M., Amin A.R.M.B., Hossain M.Z., Gentekaki E., Tsaousis A.D. A pilot study of intestinal protist detection in humans, animals, and the environment in a slum area in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Parasitol. Int. 2025;104 doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2024.102967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mohammadpour I., Bozorg-Ghalati F., Motazedian M.H. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of microsporidia and Cryptosporidium spp. in patients with multiple bowel biopsies from Fars Province, Iran. Ann. Parasitol. 2016;62:321–330. doi: 10.17420/ap6204.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Moore C.E., Elwin K., Phot N., Seng C., Mao S., Suy K., et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium species and Giardia duodenalis from symptomatic Cambodian children. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Nguyen T.T., Le T.T., Le H.H., Tang T.N., Phung T.T.H., Vu T.M.H., et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in environmental samples and faecal samples from biogas users in Bac Giang, Vietnam. Sci. Total Environ. 2023;884 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Nguyen T.T., Traub R., Pham P.D., Nguyen H.V., Nguyen K.C., Phung C.D., Dalsgaard A. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in environmental samples in Hanam Province, Vietnam. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2016;3:13–20. [Google Scholar]
  96. Nime F.A., Burek J.D., Page D.L. Acute enterocolitis in a human being infected with the protozoan Cryptosporidium. Gastroenterol. 1976;70:592–598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Omolabi K.F., Odeniran P.O., Soliman M.E. A meta-analysis of Cryptosporidium species in humans from southern Africa (2000–2020) J. Parasit. Dis. 2022;46:304–316. doi: 10.1007/s12639-021-01436-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Osman M., Benamrouz S., Guyot K., Baydoun M., Frealle E., Chabe M., et al. High association of Cryptosporidium spp. infection with colon adenocarcinoma in Lebanese patients. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Osman M., Safadi D.E., Benamrouz S., Guyot K., Dei-Cas E., Aliouat E.M., et al. Initial data on the molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in Lebanon. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Osman M., Safadi D.E., Cian A., Benamrouz S., Nourrisson C., Poirier P., et al. Correction: Prevalence and risk factors for intestinal protozoan infections with Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Blastocystis and Dientamoeba among schoolchildren in Tripoli, Lebanon. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Özkan F., İça A. Molecular diagnosis and typing of Cryptosporidium spp. species in human stools with diarrhea. Turk. J. Parasitol. 2024;48:184–190. doi: 10.4274/tpd.galenos.2024.60392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Paller V.G.V., Macalinao-Ramirez C.A., Bandal M.Z. Environmental contamination with parasites in selected rural farms in the Philippines: Impacts of farming practices on leafy greens food safety. Parasitology. 2022;149:482–489. doi: 10.1017/s0031182021002031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Pestechian N., Manesh R.M., Tavakoli S., Mokarian F., Rahmani M. Identification and subtyping of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis in cancer patients, Isfahan Province, Central Iran. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2022;17:581–588. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v17i4.11277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Poor B.M., Rashedi J., Asgharzadeh M., Fallah E., Hatam-Nahavandi K., Dalimi A. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium species in children with diarrhea in Northwest of Iran. Int. J. Mol. Cell. Med. 2015;4:235–239. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27014648 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Prasertbun R., Mori H., Sukthana Y., Popruk S., Kusolsuk T., Hagiwara K., Mahittikorn A. Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Cryptosporidium: A cross-sectional study conducted throughout Thailand. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019;19:1016. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4422-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Ranjbar R., Baghaei K., Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad E. Genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. among patients with gastrointestinal complaints referred to clinical laboratories of Tehran, Iran. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench. 2016;9:301–307. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v0i0.900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Resnhaleksmana E., Wijayanti M.A., Artama W.T. A potential zoonotic parasite: Cryptosporidium parvum transmission in rats, pigs and humans in West Lombok, Indonesia. Afr. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;15:44–51. doi: 10.21010/ajid.v15i2.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Richard R., Ithoi I., Majid M.A., Sulaiman W.W., Tan T., Nissapatorn V., Lim Y. Monitoring of waterborne parasites in two drinking water treatment plants: A study in Sarawak, Malaysia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2016;13:641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Robertson L.J., Johansen Ø.H., Kifleyohannes T., Efunshile A.M., Terefe G. Cryptosporidium infections in Africa - how important is zoonotic transmission? A review of the evidence. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.575881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Robertson L.J., Sehgal R., Goyal K. An Indian multicriteria-based risk ranking of foodborne parasites. Food Res. Int. 2015;77:315–319. [Google Scholar]
  112. Rosado-García F.M., Guerrero-Flórez M., Karanis G., Hinojosa M.D.C., Karanis P. Waterborne protozoa parasites: The Latin American perspective. Int. J. Hyg Environ. Health. 2017;220:783–798. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Ryan U., Fayer R., Xiao L. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: Current understanding and research needs. Parasitology. 2014;141:1667–1685. doi: 10.1017/S0031182014001085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Ryan U., Hijjawi N., Xiao L. Foodborne cryptosporidiosis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2018;48:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Ryan U., Zahedi A., Feng Y., Xiao L. An update on zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in humans. Animals. 2021;11:3307. doi: 10.3390/ani11113307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Ryan U., Zahedi A., Paparini A. Cryptosporidium in humans and animals - a One Health approach to prophylaxis. Parasite Immunol. 2016;38:535–547. doi: 10.1111/pim.12350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Ryan U.M., Feng Y., Fayer R., Xiao L. Taxonomy and molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium and Giardia – a 50-year perspective (1971–2021) Int. J. Parasitol. 2021;51:1099–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Sannella A.R., Suputtamongkol Y., Wongsawat E., Cacciò S.M. A retrospective molecular study of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in HIV-infected patients from Thailand. Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:91. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3348-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Sardar S.K., Ghosal A., Saito-Nakano Y., Dutta S., Nozaki T., Ganguly S. Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium viatorum infection in a patient suffering from unusual cryptosporidiosis in West Bengal, India. Kor. J. Parasitol. 2021;59:409–413. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2021.59.4.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Semmani M., Costa D., Achour N., Cherchar M., Ziane H., Mouhajir A., et al. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium infection in HIV/AIDS patients in Algeria. Viruses. 2023;15:362. doi: 10.3390/v15020362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Shahdoust S., Niyyati M., Haghighi A., Azargashb E., Khataminejad M.R. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in referred individuals to the medical centers of Tonekabon city, Mazandaran Province. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench. 2016;9:S75–S79. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28224032 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Sharbatkhori M., Mojarad E.N., Taghipour N., Pagheh A.S., Mesgarian F. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in diarrheic children from Gonbad Kavoos city, Iran. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2015;10:441–447. doi: 10.9744/dia.10.441-447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Shcherbakov O.V., Aghayan S.A., Gevorgyan H.S., Abgaryan T.A., Gevorgyan R.H., Jiménez-Meléndez A., Robertson L.J. Preliminary investigations of parasite contamination of water sources in Armenia. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2024;34 doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2024.e00221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Sim S., Won J., Kim J.W., Kim K., Park W.Y., Yu J.R. Simultaneous molecular detection of Cryptosporidium and Cyclospora from raw vegetables in Korea. Kor. J. Parasitol. 2017;55:137–142. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2017.55.2.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Sponseller J.K., Griffiths J.K., Tzipori S. The evolution of respiratory cryptosporidiosis: Evidence for transmission by inhalation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014;27:575–586. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00115-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Sutthikornchai C., Popruk S., Mahittikorn A., Arthan D., Soonthornworasiri N., Paratthakonkun C., et al. Molecular detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in school children at the Thai-Myanmar border. Parasitol. Res. 2021;120:2887–2895. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07242-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Tandukar S., Sherchand J., Bhandari D., Sherchan S., Malla B., Shrestha R.G., Haramoto E. Presence of human enteric viruses, protozoa, and indicators of pathogens in the Bagmati River, Nepal. Pathogens. 2018;7:38. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7020038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Thompson R.C.A., Ash A. Molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016;40:315–323. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Tůmová L., Ježková J., Prediger J., Holubová N., Sak B., Konečný R., et al. Cryptosporidium mortiferum n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae), the species causing lethal cryptosporidiosis in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) Parasites Vectors. 2023;16:235. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05844-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Tyzzer E.E. A sporozoan found in the peptic glands of the common mouse. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1907;5:12–13. doi: 10.3181/00379727-5-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  131. UNSD . United Nations Statistics Division, United Nations; New York, NY, USA: 2025. Standard country or area codes for statistical use.https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49 [Google Scholar]
  132. Utaaker K.S., Kumar A., Joshi H., Chaudhary S., Robertson L.J. Checking the detail in retail: Occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia on vegetables sold across different counters in Chandigarh, India. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017;263:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Utami W.S., Murhandarwati E.H., Artama W.T., Kusnanto H. Cryptosporidium infection increases the risk for chronic diarrhea among people living with HIV in Southeast Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac. J. Publ. Health. 2020;32:8–18. doi: 10.1177/1010539519895422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Vanathy K., Parija S.C., Mandal J., Hamide A., Krishnamurthy S. Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients. Tropenmed. Parasitol. 2017;7:41–46. doi: 10.4103/tp.tp_66_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Wang T., Fan Y., Koehler A.V., Ma G., Li T., Hu M., Gasser R.B. First survey of Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Enterocytozoon in diarrhoeic children from Wuhan, China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017;51:127–131. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang T., Wei Z., Zhang Y., Zhang Q., Zhang L., Yu F., et al. Molecular detection and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in kindergarten children in Southern Xinjiang, China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2022;103 doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Wang W., Gong Q.L., Zeng A., Li M.H., Zhao Q., Ni H.B. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium in pigs in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020;68:1400–1413. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Wang Y., Li N., Guo Y., Wang L., Wang R., Feng Y., Xiao L. Persistent occurrence of Cryptosporidium hominis and Giardia duodenalis subtypes in a welfare institute. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2830. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Wang Z.D., Liu Q., Liu H.H., Li S., Zhang L., Zhao Y.K., Zhu X.Q. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium, microsporidia and Isospora infection in HIV-infected people: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:28. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2558-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Wei X., Hou S., Pan X., Xu C., Li J., Yu H., et al. Microbiological contamination of strawberries from U-pick farms in Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:4910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Wei X., Li J., Hou S., Xu C., Zhang H., Atwill E.R., et al. Assessment of microbiological safety of water in public swimming pools in Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:1416. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. World Atlas The five regions of Asia. World Atlas. 2023 https://www.worldatlas.com/geography/what-are-the-five-regions-of-asia.html#h_20098269439371716952908922 [Google Scholar]
  143. Worldometer Asia population. 2025. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/asia-population/
  144. Wu Y., Gong B., Liu X., Jiang Y., Cao J., Yao L., et al. Identification of uncommon Cryptosporidium viatorum (a novel subtype XVcA2G1c) and Cryptosporidium andersoni as well as common Giardia duodenalis assemblages A and B in humans in Myanmar. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.614053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Xiao S., Yin P., Zhang Y., Hu S. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and the relationship between protozoa and water quality indicators in swimming pools. Kor. J. Parasitol. 2017;55:129–135. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2017.55.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Xiao S., Yin P., Zhang Y., Zhao X., Sun L., Yuan H., et al. Occurrence, genotyping, and health risk of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in recreational lakes in Tianjin, China. Wat. Res. 2018;141:46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Xiao S., Zhang Y., Zhao X., Sun L., Hu S. Presence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in recreational lake water in Tianjin, China: A preliminary study. Sci. Rep. 2016;8:2353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20902-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Xu N., Liu H., Jiang Y., Yin J., Yuan Z., Shen Y., Cao J. First report of Cryptosporidium viatorum and Cryptosporidium occultus in humans in China, and of the unique novel C. viatorum subtype XVaA3h. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020;20:17. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4693-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Yadav P., Khalil S., Mirdha B.R. Molecular appraisal of intestinal parasitic infection in transplant recipients. Indian J. Med. Res. 2016;144:258–264. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.195041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Yadav P., Mirdha B.R., Makharia G.K., Chaudhry R. Multilocus sequence typing of Cryptosporidium hominis from northern India. Indian J. Med. Res. 2017;145:102–108. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1064_14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Yu F., Li D., Chang Y., Wu Y., Guo Z., Jia L., et al. Molecular characterization of three intestinal protozoans in hospitalized children with different disease backgrounds in Zhengzhou, central China. Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:351. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3800-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Zahedi A., Ryan U. Cryptosporidium – an update with an emphasis on foodborne and waterborne transmission. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020;132:500–512. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Zahedi A., Ryan U., Rawlings V., Greay T., Hancock S., Bruce M., Jacobson C. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dam water on sheep farms - an important source of transmission? Vet. Parasitol. 2020;288 doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Zhang N., Yu X., Zhang H., Cui L., Li X., Zhang X., et al. Prevalence and genotyping of Cryptosporidium parvum in gastrointestinal cancer patients. J. Cancer. 2020;11:3334–3339. doi: 10.7150/jca.42393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Zhao W., Ren G., Jiang W., Wang L., Wang J., Yuan Z., et al. Genetic characterizations of Cryptosporidium spp. from children with or without diarrhea in Wenzhou, China: High probability of zoonotic transmission. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24:113. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03273-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Zhao W., Yao L., Zhuang M., Lin Y., Chen X., Wang L., et al. A baseline epidemiological study of the co-infection of enteric protozoans with human immunodeficiency virus among men who have sex with men from Northeast China. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (498.9KB, pdf)
Multimedia component 2
mmc2.xlsx (48.4KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its supplementary files.


Articles from Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-borne Diseases are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES