Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):e90188. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90188

Epigenetic Dysregulation in Neurodegenerative Disease: Implications for Neuropathology and Therapy

Hussein Qasim 1, Karis Khattab 2,, Mohammad Abu Shugaer 1, Giustino Varrassi 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12433725  PMID: 40955230

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Huntington’s disease (HD) are characterized by progressive neuronal dysfunction, yet their underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Emerging evidence implicates epigenetic dysregulation as a central contributor to the pathogenesis of these disorders. A thematic literature review was conducted across major databases using targeted search terms related to epigenetics and neurodegeneration. Studies were selected based on relevance, methodological quality, and contribution to mechanistic understanding, in accordance with Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guidelines. Across AD, PD, and HD, distinct yet overlapping patterns of epigenetic alterations were identified. In AD, dysregulated DNA methylation and histone acetylation affect genes linked to amyloid and tau pathology. In PD, hypomethylation of SNCA and altered histone acetylation contribute to α-synuclein overexpression and neuronal loss. In HD, mutant huntingtin protein disrupts chromatin remodeling by sequestering histone acetyltransferases and altering microRNA expression. These changes disrupt neuronal identity, synaptic function, and inflammatory responses, often forming feedback loops that exacerbate disease progression. Epigenetic mechanisms play a pivotal role in neurodegeneration by mediating gene-environment interactions and perpetuating neuropathological changes. Their reversible nature presents opportunities for therapeutic intervention, though challenges related to specificity, delivery, and timing remain. Continued research into epigenetic biomarkers and precision-targeted epigenetic therapies holds promise for advancing early diagnosis and disease modification in NDDs.

Keywords: alzheimer’s disease, biomarkers, epigenetics, huntington’s disease, neurodegeneration, parkinson’s disease

Introduction and background

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Huntington’s disease (HD) are characterized by progressive neuronal loss and accumulation of misfolded proteins, leading to cognitive and motor impairment [1]. Despite intense research, effective disease-modifying treatments remain elusive, partly due to the multifactorial nature of these disorders [2]. Both genetic predispositions and environmental exposures contribute to NDD pathogenesis, and recent work highlights epigenetics as a critical interface between these factors [3]. Epigenetics refers to heritable yet reversible modifications of gene function that do not involve changes in DNA sequence, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA activity [4]. These mechanisms are central to normal brain development and plasticity, but their dysregulation can bridge life-long environmental influences (toxins, diet, and stress) with gene expression changes that drive neurodegeneration [5]. Evidence accumulated over the past two decades implicates epigenetic dysregulation in the pathology of AD, PD, HD, and other NDDs [6]. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns, altered post-translational modifications of histone proteins, dysregulated microRNA, and long non-coding RNA profiles have been observed in affected brains [7]. These epigenetic changes can lead to inappropriate silencing or activation of genes involved in neuronal survival, synaptic function, inflammation, and protein homeostasis [7].

In many cases, toxic protein aggregates characteristic of NDDs can themselves perturb epigenetic enzymes; for example, α-synuclein and mutant huntingtin protein have been shown to sequester or inhibit key epigenetic regulators [8]. Such findings suggest a vicious cycle whereby neuropathological lesions induce epigenomic aberrations that further compromise neuronal health [9]. Given that epigenetic marks are potentially reversible, understanding these processes opens new avenues for therapeutic intervention [10]. In this review, we synthesize current knowledge of epigenetic mechanisms in the context of AD, PD, and HD, highlighting molecular and pathological insights from human studies and animal models. We also discuss how epigenetic changes correlate with neuropathological features and consider emerging epigenome-targeting therapies, along with the challenges and future directions for translating these insights into clinical advances.

Review

Methodology

This narrative review employs a comprehensive descriptive thematic analysis to examine the role of epigenetic dysregulation in the pathogenesis and progression of major NDDs, specifically AD, PD, and HD. The review adheres to the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guidelines to ensure scientific rigor, transparency, and academic credibility. Included studies were peer-reviewed articles focusing on epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNAs, in the context of AD, PD, or HD. Eligible literature comprised original research studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and narrative reviews. Preclinical studies, including animal models and in vitro experiments, were considered if they provided mechanistic insight relevant to human disease. Editorials, commentaries, and conference abstracts were excluded unless they presented novel hypotheses or significant conceptual frameworks. Studies were excluded if they lacked clear relevance to epigenetics in neurodegeneration or did not offer full-text access. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search covered literature published from January 2000 to March 2025. The search was performed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms such as “epigenetics AND Alzheimer’s disease,” “DNA methylation AND Parkinson’s disease,” “histone modifications AND Huntington’s disease,” and “non-coding RNAs AND neurodegeneration.” Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” were employed to refine results. The search was extended to include synonyms and related terms, such as “chromatin remodeling,” “microRNAs,” “lncRNAs,” “neuroepigenetics,” and “neurodegenerative disorders." References were managed using EndNote. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts based on the eligibility criteria. Full-text articles were subsequently assessed for inclusion. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus, with arbitration by a third reviewer when necessary. The inter-reviewer agreement exceeded 85% in the pilot screening phase, indicating consistency in the selection methodology. Reference lists of included articles were also screened for additional relevant studies using backward citation tracking.

Overview of epigenetic mechanisms

Epigenetic regulation in the CNS governs gene expression without altering DNA sequence, primarily through DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, all of which play crucial roles in maintaining neuronal identity, function, and plasticity [11]. DNA methylation involves the addition of methyl groups to CpG sites, typically silencing genes by blocking transcription factor access or recruiting repressive complexes [12]. In neurons, dynamic methylation and its oxidized form, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC), are essential for synaptic function and memory [13]. Disruption of these patterns can lead to neuronal dysfunction and degeneration [13]. Histone modifications affect chromatin structure and gene accessibility [14]. Acetylation, mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs), typically activates transcription by loosening chromatin, while deacetylation by histone deacetylases (HDACs) represses it [15]. Methylation can signal either activation (e.g., H3K4me3) or repression (e.g., H3K9me3) [16]. These modifications coordinate with DNA methylation to regulate learning, memory, and neuron-specific gene expression [16]. Aberrant histone patterns, such as reduced acetylation of neuroprotective genes, are frequently observed in neurodegenerative conditions [17]. Non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), modulate gene expression post-transcriptionally or via chromatin remodeling [18]. Brain-specific miRNAs like miR-132 regulate synaptic plasticity and memory [19]. In neurodegeneration, dysregulated miRNAs and lncRNAs can disrupt neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory pathways [20]. These RNAs are also being investigated as non-invasive biomarkers, as their expression in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may reflect CNS pathology [21]. Together, these mechanisms create a dynamic and responsive epigenetic landscape in the brain, one that becomes maladaptive in NDDs.

Epigenetics in Alzheimer’s disease

AD, characterized by amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), exhibits widespread epigenetic dysregulation that contributes to its pathogenesis [22]. Epigenetic changes in AD affect genes involved in amyloid processing, tau pathology, inflammation, and synaptic function [23].

Alterations in DNA methylation are a key feature of AD. Studies of postmortem AD brains reveal inconsistent global DNA methylation patterns, some showing decreased 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) levels and others increased, likely due to regional and cell-type variability [24]. More refined analyses demonstrate that NFT-bearing hippocampal neurons have reduced DNA methylation, linking methylation deficits to tau pathology [25]. In contrast, levels of 5-hmC are elevated in the AD brain and correlate with disease severity [26]. Locus-specific methylation changes are also consistently observed in AD [27]. For example, hypomethylation of the MAPT gene promoter is associated with increased tau expression and aggregation, while hypomethylation of BACE1, a key gene in Aβ production, may exacerbate amyloid burden [28]. Conversely, the ANK1 gene, involved in immune regulation, is repeatedly found to be hypermethylated in AD brains, although its functional role remains unclear [29]. Large epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have identified numerous differentially methylated CpG sites in the AD cortex, many of which correlate with hallmark pathological features such as plaques and tangles [30]. These findings suggest that both hypo- and hypermethylation at specific genomic loci contribute to the disrupted gene expression programs that underlie AD progression [31].

Chromatin remodeling plays a critical role in gene expression changes associated with cognitive decline in AD [32]. A hallmark of AD brains is the downregulation of synaptic plasticity genes and upregulation of inflammatory or stress-response genes, regulated in part by histone modifications [33]. Notably, there is widespread loss of histone acetylation, especially H3K27ac, at enhancers and promoters of memory-related genes (e.g., BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) and CREB targets) in brain regions such as the entorhinal cortex [34]. This loss correlates with decreased gene expression and impaired cognition [35]. One contributing factor is the elevation of HDAC2, which represses transcription by removing acetylation marks from neuronal genes [15]. In AD mouse models, HDAC2 overexpression leads to synaptic dysfunction, while treatment with HDAC inhibitors restores histone acetylation, reactivates gene expression, and improves memory [36]. Other histone marks are also dysregulated: repressive modifications like H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 are elevated at neuronal gene loci, contributing to transcriptional silencing [37]. Activation marks such as H3K27ac may appear at promoters of pro-inflammatory genes; for example, hyperacetylation of the IL-1β promoter in microglia promotes chronic neuroinflammation in AD [38]. Together, these findings suggest a global reconfiguration of chromatin architecture in AD, driven by altered activity of chromatin-modifying enzymes including HDACs, HATs, and methyltransferases.

Non-coding RNAs also play a major role in the epigenetic regulation of AD pathology [39]. Both miRNAs and lncRNAs are dysregulated in AD brains and biofluids [18]. Several miRNAs associated with synaptic function and neuroinflammation are altered. For example, miR-132, essential for synaptic integrity, is consistently downregulated in AD, which contributes to tau pathology and cognitive impairment by disinhibiting pro-inflammatory and tau-related gene expression [40,41]. In contrast, miR-146a is upregulated, particularly in glial cells, where it may initially serve an anti-inflammatory role but becomes maladaptive with chronic elevation [42]. Additional miRNAs such as miR-29 and miR-107, which normally suppress BACE1 (a key Aβ-producing gene), are also reduced, potentially increasing amyloidogenic processing [43]. Others, including miR-125b and miR-146, contribute to inflammatory signaling in glia [43]. In terms of lncRNAs, several transcripts show dysregulation in AD. BACE1-AS, which stabilizes BACE1 mRNA, may promote Aβ accumulation, while NEAT1, associated with stress granule formation and inflammation, is also upregulated [44]. Notably, some miRNAs show promise as biomarkers; altered levels of miR-125b and miR-142-3p in blood and CSF have been reported to differentiate AD patients from healthy controls [45]. These findings highlight the potential of non-coding RNAs as both mechanistic contributors and diagnostic tools in AD.

Epigenetics in Parkinson’s disease

PD is characterized by dopaminergic neuron loss in the substantia nigra and α-synuclein aggregation in Lewy bodies [46]. While some cases are linked to mutations (e.g., SNCA, LRRK2, and PINK1), most are sporadic, involving environmental triggers [47]. Epigenetic mechanisms, DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, play key roles in translating environmental and genetic risk into lasting molecular changes in the brain [11].

DNA Methylation

Hypomethylation of SNCA intron 1 is a consistent finding in PD neurons, leading to increased α-synuclein expression [48]. Other PD-related genes, such as PINK1, PRKN, DJ-1, and PGC-1α, also show aberrant methylation patterns that correspond with mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress [49]. Notably, α-synuclein can mislocalize the DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, leading to global hypomethylation in PD neurons [50], highlighting a feedback loop between protein aggregation and epigenetic disruption.

Histone Modifications

PD neurons often show decreased histone acetylation, especially at genes important for dopamine synthesis and mitochondrial defense [51]. HDAC upregulation after neurotoxin exposure worsens neuronal damage, while HDAC inhibitors like sodium butyrate offer neuroprotection in models [52]. Additionally, repressive histone methylation (e.g., H3K9me) is elevated in PD neurons, contributing to transcriptional silencing [53]. Enzymes like SIRT1 and SIRT2 modulate these effects, with opposing roles in mitochondrial regulation and neuroprotection [54]. Several miRNAs critical for dopaminergic neuron maintenance are altered in PD. miR-133b and miR-34b/c are reduced in PD brain tissue, leading to impaired neuronal survival and increased α-synuclein [55]. Others, like miR-126, are elevated and may enhance vulnerability to apoptosis [56]. Peripheral miRNA changes mirror brain alterations, suggesting potential for biomarker development [57]. lncRNAs such as NEAT1, MALAT1, and HOTAIR are also dysregulated, potentially affecting chromatin states and stress responses [58].

Epigenetics in Huntington’s disease

HD is a monogenic neurodegenerative disorder caused by an expanded CAG repeat in the HTT gene, resulting in mutant huntingtin (mHTT) protein [59]. Despite its genetic origin, HD involves widespread epigenetic dysregulation, making it a model for understanding epigenetic contributions to neurodegeneration [60].

Histone Acetylation and Chromatin Dysregulation

mHTT binds and sequesters CREB-binding protein (CBP), a HAT essential for activating genes involved in neuroplasticity and survival [61]. This leads to reduced histone acetylation and transcriptional repression of neuron-specific genes such as BDNF, leading to impaired synaptic and metabolic functions in HD neurons [62]. Preclinical models have shown that HDAC inhibitors (e.g., sodium butyrate and SAHA) can partially restore acetylation, improve motor symptoms, and delay progression, although toxicity limits their translational use [63].

Histone Methylation and Chromatin Silencing

mHTT enhances gene repression by interacting with polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), increasing H3K27me3 marks [64]. Other chromatin-modifying enzymes like SETDB1 (H3K9 methyltransferase) and KDM5C (H3K4 demethylase) are also dysregulated in HD, further promoting transcriptional silencing [65]. Additionally, mHTT impairs the regulation of REST, a transcriptional repressor, allowing it to enter the nucleus and silence many neuronal genes and miRNAs, compounding the loss of neuronal identity [66]. Though less prominent than histone changes, HD brains show gene-specific DNA methylation alterations, particularly at genes involved in synaptic function and development [67]. Aberrant one-carbon metabolism in HD may affect methyl donor availability (SAM), influencing methylation patterns, the principal methyl donor for DNA and histone methylation reactions, thereby influencing epigenetic regulation [68]. Some studies suggest that epigenetic interventions may induce heritable DNA methylation changes across generations in HD models [69]. Moreover, numerous miRNAs are dysregulated in HD, including REST-repressed miR-124, miR-132, and miR-212, all downregulated and linked to impaired synaptic function [70]. Others, like miR-146a, are upregulated in response to inflammation [71]. Additionally, HD affects miRNA processing components (e.g., Dicer and argonaute), causing global miRNA imbalance [72]. Dysregulation of lncRNAs also suggests lncRNAs may modulate neuronal gene expression in HD [73].

Feedback loops across diseases

NDDs share common feedback loops between epigenetic dysregulation and pathological progression [74]. As illustrated in Figure 1, these feedback mechanisms contribute to the advancement of AD, PD, and HD through distinct yet overlapping pathways. In AD, oxidative stress resulting from Aβ and tau accumulation leads to DNA damage and chromatin alterations, which subsequently upregulate genes that promote further protein aggregation [75]. In PD, inflammation triggered by Lewy body formation activates pro-apoptotic genes via epigenetic modifications, thereby accelerating neuronal loss [76]. In HD, repression of BDNF by the transcriptional repressor REST diminishes trophic support to neurons, hastening striatal degeneration and potentially contributing to cortical dysfunction through feedback effects [77].

Figure 1. Feedback loops linking epigenetic dysregulation with neuropathology in NDDs.

Figure 1

NDDs, neurodegenerative diseases; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor

The figure was created by the authors.

Therapeutic implications

Epigenetic alterations in NDDs are increasingly viewed as viable therapeutic targets due to their reversible nature [78]. Various epigenetic drugs, many adapted from oncology, have shown promise in preclinical models of AD, PD, and HD disease [78]. HDAC inhibitors are the most extensively studied [79]. In AD models, drugs like sodium butyrate and SAHA restore histone acetylation, improve cognition, and reduce amyloid and tau pathology [80]. Similar neuroprotective effects have been seen in PD and HDs [80]. Early-phase clinical trials have shown modest cognitive improvements, though long-term efficacy and safety remain uncertain [81]. Challenges include off-target effects, systemic toxicity, and limited brain penetration [82]. To address these, research is focusing on isoform-selective and brain-targeted HDAC inhibitors [83]. DNA methylation modulators like DNMT inhibitors (e.g., 5-azacytidine) can reactivate silenced genes but are not yet viable for brain disorders due to toxicity and lack of CNS specificity [84]. Nutritional approaches, such as B-vitamin and SAM supplementation, offer indirect modulation of methylation and have shown neuroprotective effects in some studies [85]. Non-coding RNA-based therapies are another emerging area [86]. Strategies include miRNA mimics (e.g., miR-132 in AD) and antagomirs (e.g., targeting miR-146a) [87]. In PD and HD, approaches to reduce alpha-synuclein or mutant HTT via RNA targeting or CRISPR-based epigenome editing are in development [88]. These offer high specificity and potential for disease modification. Emerging epigenetic technologies like CRISPR-dCas9 fusion systems allow locus-specific activation or repression of genes without altering the DNA sequence [89]. Though conceptually powerful, these face delivery and safety challenges before clinical application [90]. Also, epigenetic drugs may enhance the efficacy of existing treatments, e.g., HDAC inhibitors might complement immunotherapies in AD or dopamine therapies in PD [91]. HDAC inhibitors may also promote regeneration when combined with stem cell or neurotrophic factor therapies [92]. Moreover, lifestyle factors like exercise and diet, which exert epigenetic effects, may offer low-risk complementary strategies [93]. For example, exercise increases BDNF expression via histone acetylation [94]. Finally, the overcorrection or off-target epigenetic effects could be harmful, potentially activating oncogenes or affecting non-neuronal tissues [95]. Early intervention, before extensive neuronal loss, is likely key [96]. Biomarker-guided patient selection may help optimize timing and targeting [97].

Research gaps and future directions

While progress has been made in neuroepigenetics, several important questions remain [98]. A key issue is whether epigenetic changes are a cause of neurodegeneration or a consequence [99]. Experimental models with controlled epigenetic alterations are needed to clarify this [100]. Another major priority is cell-type-specific analysis: bulk tissue studies can obscure important differences, so techniques like single-cell sequencing and sorted nuclei profiling should be used to map epigenetic changes in vulnerable neuronal populations [101]. Integrating epigenetic data with transcriptomics, proteomics, and genetics will help uncover causal mechanisms and regulatory networks [102]. Similarly, studying how environmental factors such as toxins, diet, or exercise influence the epigenome could lead to preventative strategies [103]. Epigenetic biomarkers, like DNA methylation signatures or miRNA panels, also hold potential for early diagnosis and tracking disease progression, but they need further validation and refinement, especially for brain specificity and clinical applicability [104]. Finally, deeper mechanistic studies are required to connect specific epigenetic changes with neuronal dysfunction [105]. Exploring epigenetic alterations across multiple NDDs may reveal shared pathways and targets for intervention [99]. Bridging these gaps will require collaboration across molecular biology, bioinformatics, and clinical research to realize the full therapeutic potential of epigenetics in neurodegeneration [106]. The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence might definitely improve the clinical process [107,108].

Conclusions

Epigenetic dysregulation, through changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, has emerged as a central mechanism linking genetic risk, environmental exposures, and neuropathology in major NDDs such as AD, PD, and HD. These changes can silence protective genes and activate degenerative pathways, contributing directly to disease progression. Importantly, epigenetic marks are reversible, making them attractive therapeutic targets and potential early biomarkers for diagnosis and patient stratification. Although still in early stages, epigenetic therapies show promise in modifying disease trajectories by simultaneously addressing multiple pathogenic pathways. Continued interdisciplinary research is essential to translate these findings into safe and effective treatments, positioning epigenetics as a promising frontier in combating neurodegeneration.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Paolo Procacci Foundation for its support with the editing process.

Disclosures

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Karis Khattab, Hussein Qasim, Mohammad Abu Shugaer, Giustino Varrassi

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Karis Khattab, Hussein Qasim, Mohammad Abu Shugaer, Giustino Varrassi

Drafting of the manuscript:  Karis Khattab, Hussein Qasim, Mohammad Abu Shugaer, Giustino Varrassi

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Karis Khattab, Hussein Qasim, Mohammad Abu Shugaer, Giustino Varrassi

Supervision:  Giustino Varrassi

References

  • 1.Basic mechanisms of neurodegeneration: a critical update. Jellinger KA. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:457–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01010.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Neurodegenerative diseases: multifactorial conformational diseases and their therapeutic interventions. Sheikh S, Safia Safia, Haque E, Mir SS. J Neurodegener Dis. 2013;2013:563481. doi: 10.1155/2013/563481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Environmental exposures influence multigenerational epigenetic transmission. Klibaner-Schiff E, Simonin EM, Akdis CA, et al. Clin Epigenetics. 2024;16:145. doi: 10.1186/s13148-024-01762-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Epigenetics: principles and practice. Hamilton JP. Dig Dis. 2011;29:130–135. doi: 10.1159/000323874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Epigenetic signature in neural plasticity: the journey so far and journey ahead. Nayak M, Das D, Pradhan J, Ahmed RG, Laureano-Melo R, Dandapat J. Heliyon. 2022;8:0. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reversing epigenetic dysregulation in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanistic and therapeutic considerations. Olawade DB, Rashad I, Egbon E, Teke J, Ovsepian SV, Boussios S. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:4929. doi: 10.3390/ijms26104929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.The role of non-coding RNAs in epigenetic dysregulation in glioblastoma development. Isachesku E, Braicu C, Pirlog R, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:16320. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.The aggregation of huntingtin and α-synuclein. Chánez-Cárdenas ME, Vázquez-Contreras E. J Biophys. 2012;2012:606172. doi: 10.1155/2012/606172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Epigenetic mechanisms in neurological and neurodegenerative diseases. Landgrave-Gómez J, Mercado-Gómez O, Guevara-Guzmán R. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:58. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.How epigenetics impacts on human diseases. Farsetti A, Illi B, Gaetano C. Eur J Intern Med. 2023;114:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.05.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.An overview of the epigenetic modifications in the brain under normal and pathological conditions. Lossi L, Castagna C, Merighi A. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:3881. doi: 10.3390/ijms25073881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.DNA methylation and its basic function. Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:23–38. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.5-hmC in the brain is abundant in synaptic genes and shows differences at the exon-intron boundary. Khare T, Pai S, Koncevicius K, et al. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:1037–1043. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.The correlation between histone modifications and gene expression. Dong X, Weng Z. Epigenomics. 2013;5:113–116. doi: 10.2217/epi.13.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Erasers of histone acetylation: the histone deacetylase enzymes. Seto E, Yoshida M. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6:0. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Histone methyltransferase and histone methylation in inflammatory T-cell responses. He S, Tong Q, Bishop DK, Zhang Y. Immunotherapy. 2013;5:989–1004. doi: 10.2217/imt.13.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Histone modifications in Alzheimer's disease. Santana DA, Smith MA, Chen ES. Genes (Basel) 2023;14:347. doi: 10.3390/genes14020347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as new tools for cancer therapy: first steps from bench to bedside. Ratti M, Lampis A, Ghidini M, Salati M, Mirchev MB, Valeri N, Hahne JC. Target Oncol. 2020;15:261–278. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00717-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.MicroRNA-132 regulates recognition memory and synaptic plasticity in the perirhinal cortex. Scott HL, Tamagnini F, Narduzzo KE, et al. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;36:2941–2948. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08220.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Non-coding RNAs: the neuroinflammatory regulators in neurodegenerative diseases. Jiang H, Zhang Y, Yue J, Shi Y, Xiao B, Xiao W, Luo Z. Front Neurol. 2022;13:929290. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.929290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cell-free miRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers in brain tumors. Beylerli O, Encarnacion Ramirez MJ, Shumadalova A, Ilyasova T, Zemlyanskiy M, Beilerli A, Montemurro N. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13:2888. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Alzheimer's disease puzzle: delving into pathogenesis hypotheses. Nasb M, Tao W, Chen N. Aging Dis. 2024;15:43–73. doi: 10.14336/AD.2023.0608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Epigenetic changes in Alzheimer's disease: DNA methylation and histone modification. De Plano LM, Saitta A, Oddo S, Caccamo A. Cells. 2024;13:719. doi: 10.3390/cells13080719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DNA methylation alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Yokoyama AS, Rutledge JC, Medici V. Environ Epigenet. 2017;3:0. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvx008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.A closer look into the role of protein tau in the identification of promising therapeutic targets for Alzheimer's disease. Islam Khan R, Nirzhor SS, Rashid B. Brain Sci. 2018;8:162. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8090162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.The emerging role of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in neurodegenerative diseases. Al-Mahdawi S, Virmouni SA, Pook MA. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:397. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Epigenetic alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Sanchez-Mut JV, Gräff J. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:347. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.The amyloid-β pathway in Alzheimer's disease. Hampel H, Hardy J, Blennow K, et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:5481–5503. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01249-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Epigenetics in Alzheimer's disease. Gao X, Chen Q, Yao H, Tan J, Liu Z, Zhou Y, Zou Z. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:911635. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.911635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Entorhinal cortex epigenome-wide association study highlights four novel loci showing differential methylation in Alzheimer's disease. Sommerer Y, Dobricic V, Schilling M, et al. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023;15:92. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01232-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Epigenetic mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease. Balazs R. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. 2014;4:85–102. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S37341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Epigenetic changes and chromatin reorganization in brain function: lessons from fear memory ensemble and Alzheimer's disease. van Zundert B, Montecino M. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12081. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alzheimer's disorder: epigenetic connection and associated risk factors. Sharma VK, Mehta V, Singh TG. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18:740–753. doi: 10.2174/1570159X18666200128125641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.The role of histone modifications: from neurodevelopment to neurodiseases. Park J, Lee K, Kim K, Yi SJ. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:217. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01078-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Loss of NRF2 leads to impaired mitochondrial function, decreased synaptic density and exacerbated age-related cognitive deficits. Zweig JA, Caruso M, Brandes MS, Gray NE. Exp Gerontol. 2020;131:110767. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2019.110767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Multiple roles of HDAC inhibition in neurodegenerative conditions. Chuang DM, Leng Y, Marinova Z, Kim HJ, Chiu CT. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32:591–601. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Targeting neuronal epigenomes for brain rejuvenation. Zocher S. EMBO J. 2024;43:3312–3326. doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00148-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in Alzheimer's disease. Wang WY, Tan MS, Yu JT, Tan L. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3:136. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Non-coding RNAs as novel regulators of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease. Liu Y, Cheng X, Li H, Hui S, Zhang Z, Xiao Y, Peng W. Front Immunol. 2022;13:908076. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.908076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.miR-132 regulates the expression of synaptic proteins in APP/PS1 transgenic mice through C1q. Xu N, Li AD, Ji LL, Ye Y, Wang ZY, Tong L. Eur J Histochem. 2019;63 doi: 10.4081/ejh.2019.3008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tau and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: interplay mechanisms and clinical translation. Chen Y, Yu Y. J Neuroinflammation. 2023;20:165. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02853-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.microRNA-146a is a wide-reaching neuroinflammatory regulator and potential treatment target in neurological diseases. Fan W, Liang C, Ou M, Zou T, Sun F, Zhou H, Cui L. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:90. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.00090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Downregulated miR-29c correlates with increased BACE1 expression in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Lei X, Lei L, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Cheng Y. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4396232/pdf/ijcep0008-1565.pdf. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:1565–1574. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Long non-coding RNAs as key regulators of neurodegenerative protein aggregation. Xu Q, Liu D, Zhu LQ, Su Y, Huang HZ. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21:0. doi: 10.1002/alz.14498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.miRNAs as biomarkers in disease: latest findings regarding their role in diagnosis and prognosis. Condrat CE, Thompson DC, Barbu MG, et al. Cells. 2020;9:276. doi: 10.3390/cells9020276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.α-Synucleinopathy and selective dopaminergic neuron loss in a rat lentiviral-based model of Parkinson's disease. Lo Bianco C, Ridet JL, Schneider BL, Deglon N, Aebischer P. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:10813–10818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152339799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Genetic etiology of Parkinson disease associated with mutations in the SNCA, PARK2, PINK1, PARK7, and LRRK2 genes: a mutation update. Nuytemans K, Theuns J, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:763–780. doi: 10.1002/humu.21277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Methylation regulates alpha-synuclein expression and is decreased in Parkinson's disease patients' brains. Jowaed A, Schmitt I, Kaut O, Wüllner U. J Neurosci. 2010;30:6355–6359. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6119-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.The epigenetic mechanisms involved in mitochondrial dysfunction: implication for Parkinson's disease. Chen Z, Rasheed M, Deng Y. Brain Pathol. 2022;32:0. doi: 10.1111/bpa.13012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.α-synuclein sequesters DNMT1 from the nucleus: a novel mechanism for epigenetic alterations in Lewy body diseases. Desplats P, Spencer B, Coffee E, et al. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:9031–9037. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C110.212589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Understanding the susceptibility of dopamine neurons to mitochondrial stressors in Parkinson's disease. Haddad D, Nakamura K. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:3702–3713. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.The impact of the histone deacetylase inhibitor-sodium butyrate on complement-mediated synapse loss in a rat model of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. Ziabska K, Gewartowska M, Frontczak-Baniewicz M, Sypecka J, Ziemka-Nalecz M. Mol Neurobiol. 2025;62:5216–5233. doi: 10.1007/s12035-024-04591-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Histone methylation regulation in neurodegenerative disorders. Basavarajappa BS, Subbanna S. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:4654. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sirtuins at the crossroads between mitochondrial quality control and neurodegenerative diseases: structure, regulation, modifications, and modulators. Xu H, Liu YY, Li LS, Liu YS. Aging Dis. 2023;14:794–824. doi: 10.14336/AD.2022.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.microRNA dysregulation in Parkinson's disease: a narrative review. Nies YH, Mohamad Najib NH, Lim WL, Kamaruzzaman MA, Yahaya MF, Teoh SL. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:660379. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.660379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.MicroRNA‑126 inhibits endothelial permeability and apoptosis in apolipoprotein E‑knockout mice fed a high‑fat diet. Cheng XW, Wan YF, Zhou Q, Wang Y, Zhu HQ. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16:3061–3068. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Exploiting circulating microRNAs as biomarkers in psychiatric disorders. Roy B, Yoshino Y, Allen L, Prall K, Schell G, Dwivedi Y. Mol Diagn Ther. 2020;24:279–298. doi: 10.1007/s40291-020-00464-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Long non-coding RNAs: roles in cellular stress responses and epigenetic mechanisms regulating chromatin. Nickerson JA, Momen-Heravi F. Nucleus. 2024;15:2350180. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2024.2350180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Huntington's disease: complex pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Tong H, Yang T, Xu S, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:3845. doi: 10.3390/ijms25073845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Epigenetic regulation in neurodegenerative diseases. Berson A, Nativio R, Berger SL, Bonini NM. Trends Neurosci. 2018;41:587–598. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in Huntington's disease: implications for therapeutic targeting. Joshi DC, Chavan MB, Gurow K, Gupta M, Dhaliwal JS, Ming LC. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025;183:117827. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.117827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Reversible epigenetic histone modifications and Bdnf expression in neurons with aging and from a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Walker MP, LaFerla FM, Oddo SS, Brewer GJ. Age (Dordr) 2013;35:519–531. doi: 10.1007/s11357-011-9375-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Histone deacetylases inhibitors in neurodegenerative diseases, neuroprotection and neuronal differentiation. Shukla S, Tekwani BL. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:537. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Molecular mechanisms directing PRC2 recruitment and H3K27 methylation. Laugesen A, Højfeldt JW, Helin K. Mol Cell. 2019;74:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chromatin modifiers in neurodevelopment. Rezazadeh S, Ji H, Giulivi C. Front Mol Neurosci. 2025;18:1551107. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2025.1551107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dysregulation of REST-regulated coding and non-coding RNAs in a cellular model of Huntington's disease. Soldati C, Bithell A, Johnston C, Wong KY, Stanton LW, Buckley NJ. J Neurochem. 2013;124:418–430. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.The role of DNA methylation in progression of neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases as well as the prospect of using DNA methylation inhibitors as therapeutic agents for such disorders. Rasmi Y, Shokati A, Hassan A, et al. IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023;14:28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.The impact of one carbon metabolism on histone methylation. Serefidou M, Venkatasubramani AV, Imhof A. Front Genet. 2019;10:764. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Epigenetic inheritance of disease and disease risk. Bohacek J, Mansuy IM. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:220–236. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.microRNAs in neurodegeneration: current findings and potential impacts. Sharma S, Lu HC. J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism. 2018;8:420. doi: 10.4172/2161-0460.1000420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dual role of microRNA-146a in experimental inflammation in human pulmonary epithelial and immune cells and expression in inflammatory lung diseases. Gronau L, Duecker RP, Jerkic SP, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:7686. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Widespread alterations in microRNA biogenesis in human Huntington's disease putamen. Petry S, Keraudren R, Nateghi B, et al. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2022;10:106. doi: 10.1186/s40478-022-01407-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.An emerging role for long non-coding RNA dysregulation in neurological disorders. Fenoglio C, Ridolfi E, Galimberti D, Scarpini E. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:20427–20442. doi: 10.3390/ijms141020427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Epigenetic mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases and acute brain injury. Bertogliat MJ, Morris-Blanco KC, Vemuganti R. Neurochem Int. 2020;133:104642. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Epigenetics, oxidative stress, and Alzheimer disease. Zawia NH, Lahiri DK, Cardozo-Pelaez F. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;46:1241–1249. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Epigenetics in Lewy body diseases: impact on gene expression, utility as a biomarker, and possibilities for therapy. Urbizu A, Beyer K. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:4718. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cortical and striatal circuits in Huntington's disease. Blumenstock S, Dudanova I. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:82. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Epigenetic explorations of neurological disorders, the identification methods, and therapeutic avenues. Firdaus Z, Li X. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:11658. doi: 10.3390/ijms252111658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Histone deacetylase inhibitors and cell death. Zhang J, Zhong Q. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:3885–3901. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1656-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sodium butyrate improves memory function in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model when administered at an advanced stage of disease progression. Govindarajan N, Agis-Balboa RC, Walter J, Sananbenesi F, Fischer A. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26:187–197. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lecanemab reduces brain amyloid-β and delays cognitive worsening. Knopman DS. Cell Rep Med. 2023;4:100982. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Alzheimer's disease and drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier: approaches and challenges. Iqbal I, Saqib F, Mubarak Z, et al. Eur J Med Res. 2024;29:313. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01915-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Advances in targeting histone deacetylase for treatment of solid tumors. Shi MQ, Xu Y, Fu X, Pan DS, Lu XP, Xiao Y, Jiang YZ. J Hematol Oncol. 2024;17:37. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01551-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Recent progress in DNA methyltransferase inhibitors as anticancer agents. Zhang Z, Wang G, Li Y, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1072651. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1072651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Targeting DNA methylation in the adult brain through diet. Allison J, Kaliszewska A, Uceda S, Reiriz M, Arias N. Nutrients. 2021;13:3979. doi: 10.3390/nu13113979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Non-coding RNAs: emerging biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer and inflammatory diseases. Hossam Abdelmonem B, Kamal LT, Wardy LW, Ragheb M, Hanna MM, Elsharkawy M, Abdelnaser A. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1534862. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1534862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.The promise of microRNA-based therapies in Alzheimer's disease: challenges and perspectives. Walgrave H, Zhou L, De Strooper B, Salta E. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16:76. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00496-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.CRISPR-Cas9-based technology and its relevance to gene editing in Parkinson's disease. Rahman MU, Bilal M, Shah JA, Kaushik A, Teissedre PL, Kujawska M. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1252. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.CRISPR/dCas9 tools: Epigenetic mechanism and application in gene transcriptional regulation. Cai R, Lv R, Shi X, Yang G, Jin J. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:14865. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Sittig DF, Wright A, Coiera E, Magrabi F, Ratwani R, Bates DW, Singh H. Health Informatics J. 2020;26:181–189. doi: 10.1177/1460458218814893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges. Dai W, Qiao X, Fang Y, et al. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9:332. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02039-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.HDAC signaling in neuronal development and axon regeneration. Cho Y, Cavalli V. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;27:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Epigenetic effects of healthy foods and lifestyle habits from the southern European Atlantic diet pattern: a narrative review. Lorenzo PM, Izquierdo AG, Rodriguez-Carnero G, et al. Adv Nutr. 2022;13:1725–1747. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Exercise promotes the expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) through the action of the ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate. Sleiman SF, Henry J, Al-Haddad R, et al. Elife. 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/eLife.15092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Excess translation of epigenetic regulators contributes to fragile X syndrome and is alleviated by BRD4 inhibition. Korb E, Herre M, Zucker-Scharff I, Gresack J, Allis CD, Darnell RB. Cell. 2017;170:1209–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Early diagnostics and early intervention in neurodevelopmental disorders-age-dependent challenges and opportunities. Hadders-Algra M. J Clin Med. 2021;10:861. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Novel molecular biomarkers to guide treatment decision-making in metastatic urothelial cancer-a patient cohort analysis. Robbrecht DG, Salhi Y, Martens JW, et al. Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Decoding the epigenetic language of neuronal plasticity. Borrelli E, Nestler EJ, Allis CD, Sassone-Corsi P. Neuron. 2008;60:961–974. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Epigenetic changes in neurodegenerative diseases. Kwon MJ, Kim S, Han MH, Lee SB. Mol Cells. 2016;39:783–789. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2016.0233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Epigenetic modifications: basic mechanisms and role in cardiovascular disease. Handy DE, Castro R, Loscalzo J. Circulation. 2011;123:2145–2156. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.956839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Interpreting non-coding disease-associated human variants using single-cell epigenomics. Gaulton KJ, Preissl S, Ren B. Nat Rev Genet. 2023;24:516–534. doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00598-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Transcriptomics and epigenetic data integration learning module on Google Cloud. Ruprecht NA, Kennedy JD, Bansal B, et al. Brief Bioinform. 2024;25:0. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.The impact of nutrition and environmental epigenetics on human health and disease. Tiffon C. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3425. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.A comprehensive study on epigenetic biomarkers in early detection and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease. Parikh D, Shah M. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioana.2024.05.005 Biomed Anal. 2024;1:138–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Epigenetic mechanisms underlying nervous system diseases. Qureshi IA, Mehler MF. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;147:43–58. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63233-3.00005-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Elucidating neuroepigenetic mechanisms to inform targeted therapeutics for brain disorders. Weekley BH, Ahmed NI, Maze I. iScience. 2025;28:112092. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Machine learning in pain medicine: an up-to-date systematic review. Matsangidou M, Liampas A, Pittara M, Pattichi CS, Zis P. Pain Ther. 2021;10:1067–1084. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00324-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Incorporation of "artificial intelligence" for objective pain assessment: a comprehensive review. El-Tallawy SN, Pergolizzi JV, Vasiliu-Feltes I, et al. Pain Ther. 2024;13:293–317. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00584-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES