Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2025 Sep 14;15(10):346. doi: 10.1007/s13205-025-04502-3

Antitumor potential of silver nanoparticles against lung cancer: current trends, scope and relevance

Anshika Kamboj 1, Mayank Raj 1, Vikas Kumar 2, Sushil Kumar Upadhyay 1, Manoj Singh 1,✉, Ajay Sharma 3,4, Anil Kumar Sharma 5,✉
PMCID: PMC12433929  PMID: 40959144

Abstract

Lung cancer continues to be a disease that is feared on a global scale due to its high mortality rates. The annual incidence of lung cancer is estimated to be 1.8 million, with approximately 1.6 million fatalities. Conventional treatment regimens are ineffective because they are unable to eradicate lung cancer stem cells (LCSCs). LCSCs are known to be highly resistant to treatment, induce relapse, strengthen metastasis, preserve tumorigenicity, and self-renewal. This demonstrates the necessity of a novel treatment modality that can specifically target lung cancer and its progenitor cells. Nanomaterials (NMs) handle unique challenges with outstanding solutions in a variety of industrial and scientific applications. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are among the most commonly used NMs in drug delivery, medical diagnostics, energy harvesting devices, sensors, lubricants, and bioremediation. Notably, they have demonstrated strong antibacterial, anticancer, and antiviral capabilities in the biomedical sector. The literature analysis reveals a selective cytotoxic impact on cancer cells compared to healthy cells, highlighting its potential utility in cancer treatment and emphasizing the necessity to investigate the potential risk of their use to the environment and human health.

Keywords: Silver nanoparticles, Antitumor potential, Lung cancer, Nanomedicine, Treatment

Introduction

Silver (Ag) is a d-block element and is used as an active metal for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Various other nanoparticles are also available, but Ag has an advantage due to its highly efficient biomedical nature i.e., it acts as an antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial agent. Therefore, Ag is being actively used in the synthesis of metal-based nanoparticles (Takac et al. 2023). AgNPs due to their modifiable shape, size, high drug capacity and high surface to volume ratio, make them suitable to be used as antitumor agents and as a drug carrier for cancer treatment in conjugation with adjutants, capping agents, bioconjugate and reducing agents. AgNPs also act as a carrier for proteins against lung cancer, breast carcinoma and neural cancer by activation of pro-apoptotic genes such as caspase-3, Bax, p53 and downregulation of anti-apoptotic genes Bcl-2. The physico-chemical properties of AgNPs vary according to their size and it has been found that the particle size ranging from 70–200 nm is suitable for cancer treatment as it becomes easier for them to penetrate the cell membrane for the intracellular drug delivery (Jayachandran et al. 2023).

According to the American Cancer Society, cancer is a group of diseases characterized by uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells. The molecular causes of cancer include mutations, alterations in the normal cell cycle, exposure to UV radiations, DNA damage, activation of oncogenes or proto-oncogenes, whereas alcohol consumption, smoking, tobacco chewing, cosmetic products, carcinogenic agents and drug overdose are also one of the major causes in the present scenario (Foulkes et al. 2019). Cancer has become one of the leading causes of deaths worldwide. Nearly a millions of people die annually due to cancer and the most common ones are breast cancer, lung cancer, and colon cancer. There are various cell lines related to each type of cancer, such as lung cancer- A549 cells, breast cancer- MCF-7 cells, colon cancer- HT29, cervical cancer- HeLa cells and Dalt in lymphoma ascites cancer.

Lung cancer is a tumor developed within the lungs or the airways. As per WHO, lung cancer is a type of cancer that is developed when abnormal cells grow uncontrollably in lungs as described in Fig. 1. The major causes include smoking, chewing tobacco, cigar use, exposure to harmful chemicals, radon gas, and pollutants, as well as factors such as age, family history, and pre-existing respiratory or pulmonary diseases (Emphysema, COPD) (Malik and Mukherjee 2018). Lung cancer, in fact, is a significant public health concern, causing a considerable number of deaths globally. Lung cancer is mainly categorized into two types—Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). The SCLC arises from central regions of the lung, which is approximately 10–15% of total lung cancers. Nearly 70% of SCLC is caused due to mutation in the p53 genes. It is generally metastatic in nature, shows resistance to drugs and has a chance of relapse. The NSCLC occupies nearly 80–85% of total lung cancers and is further classified into Adenocarcinoma, Large cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. All the major causes associated with lung cancer mainly lead to NSCLC (Rozalen et al. 2020). Number of treatments are available for lung cancer varying from traditional to advanced methods such as surgery (removal of affected area or cancer cell mass), chemotherapy (administration of drugs such as cisplatin, temozolomide, dacarbazine and cyclophosphamide), radiotherapy (high-powered X-ray, protons are used to damage the genetic material of cancer cells), immunotherapy and drug delivery systems. However, the main problem associated with the above treatments are their adverse side effects (hair loss, weight loss, skin allergies, inflammation), limited specificity in case of tumor cell recognition, resistance to antitumor drugs over a period of time and possibility of relapse (Noorbazargan et al. 2021; Jin et al. 2020).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Global cancer statistics: representation of data through pie chart depicting the percentage of cases in various types of Cancer

Therefore, nanotechnology has been an area of interest for cancer treatment. Nanoparticles, due to their smaller size, high penetration power, reactivity and efficient catalytic activity, are being exploited as antitumor particles. Silver nanoparticles are one such NP which have been proven to be an effective remedy for the treatment of lung cancer (Raja et al. 2020). Silver nanoparticles are preferred over any other metal nanoparticles, such as Cu, Au, C and quantum dots, due to their good conductivity, stability, antimicrobial activity, anti-inflammation and anti-tumor activities. In addition, these nanoparticles were reported to be non-toxic to humans at low dosage as compared to platinum, gold or other metal nanoparticles. Hence, silver nanoparticles are considered to be more effective in lung cancer treatment (Gul et al. 2021; Huy et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2021).

Synthesis of silver nanoparticles

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are molecules synthesized in the nano range with Ag as an active metal. AgNPs are being used in nanomedicine recently for the treatment of cancer through a drug delivery system and immune therapy. Therefore, the demand has increased to a greater extent for the synthesis of AgNPs. They can be synthesized by various means, including physical, chemical and biological methods, whereas the physical and chemical methods are more popular for the synthesis of nanoparticles as they are easy to perform, require less time and have the ease of availability of chemicals. However, owing to some of the disadvantages associated with them, biological methods such as green synthesis have been accepted more widely as they involves an eco-friendly way of synthesizing AgNPs (Nguyen et al. 2023; Ahmed et al. 2023).

Chemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles

One of the most commonly adopted chemical method includes chemical reduction of silver nitrate solution containing silver in its ( + 1) oxidation state (Ag+1), which is boiled at high temperature followed by the addition of a reducing agent namely tri-sodium citrate (Na3C6H5O7) to the solution drop-wise and is applied to a continuous vigorous agitation or stirring. Upon stirring, the Ag ion reduces from the oxidative state and color change in the solution has been observed. The resultant mixture is then allowed to cool at room temperature and subjected to purification and the purified silver nanoparticles are used for various purposes (Dhaka et al. 2023). The chemical equation for the above process is given as:

(Ag+1) + Sodium citrate (complex)Ag0 + Sodium citrate (ppt)

There are plenty of other physical & chemical methods, such as polyol method, hydrothermal method, salvation method and co-precipitation method, to synthesize AgNPs. However, the major disadvantages associated with these methods are very costly, including the use of certain toxic chemical compounds that are hazardous to the environment. Therefore, a method that is environmentally and economically stable is required and that is where the biological or green synthesis of nanoparticles came into play (Ahmed et al. 2023; Raj et al. 2023).

Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles

The biological synthesis includes the use of either bacterial strains or plant extracts to obtain AgNPs. Various bacterial strains such as Escherichia coli DH5α, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Shewanella oneidensis and High GC rich Gram positive bacteria are grown on culture plates and allowed to uptake the silver ions from their surrounding media and during their metabolism, they produce secondary metabolites containing COOH, CHO−, OH groups that stabilizes silver and through enzymatic action, and converts silver into its elemental state from the ionic state, thus producing a large number of silver nanoparticles either by intracellular or extracellular method (Singh et al. 2022c). Through extracellular production, the microbes grown on petri plates containing silver nitrate are centrifuged upon growth and secondary metabolites secreted by bacteria are thus present in the supernatant containing enzymes that catalyze the reaction. Whereas in the case of intracellular production, the microbes are incubated with a silver ion solution, which adheres to the cell wall of bacteria. The enzymes are produced by bacteria as monoclusters catalyzing the reduction of silver ion to its ground state and the change in color is observed i.e. from pale yellow to brown, indicating the formation of AgNPs. Further, through cell lysis and purification techniques AgNPs are characterized (Jabeen et al. 2021).

The crude plant extracts are also used to prepare silver nanoparticles in a cost effective and eco-friendly manner. Acalypha indica, Alternanthera sessilis, Andrographis paniculata and Aloe vera are certain plant species by means of which silver nanoparticles can be synthesized. From plants, the crude extract (natural compound) is obtained through solvent extraction using ethanol or methanol, soxhelt extraction, or decoction extraction. The phytochemicals produced by the plants resist fungi, bacteria, or virus growth i.e. flavonoids, carotenoids, terpenoids, alanoids and phenolic compounds act as reducing agent and reduce the silver ion into its ground state (Vanlalveni et al. 2021; Yousaf et al. 2020; Shaaban et al. 2021). The AgNPs are generally characterized using various techniques such as UV–visible spectroscopy, XRD, FTIR spectroscopy, X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), DLS analysis, SEM, EDX/EDS, AFM, TEM, SAED, and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) to achieve size, shape, crystallinity, zeta potential, hydrodynamic size, surface area, porosity, solubility, aggregation, adsorption potential of nanoparticles (Ingale and Chaudhari 2013; Mali et al. 2019, 2017). The brownish tint produced by the interaction of silver metal salt with plant extract confirms AgNP production. An SPR peak often develops in the 400–500 nm range due to the combined electron vibration in the synthesised NPs conduction band, which is in resonance with the light waves and may be detected by a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Sundeep et al. 2017; Reddy et al. 2019). FTIR is a sophisticated approach for studying the role of phytochemicals in AgNP reduction and stabilization, such as flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, phenolic acids, and proteins. Silver ions oxidized active organic functional groups in plant extracts, may include −OH, −NH2, and −CHO groups. The reduction of the metal precursor and the synthesis of NPs are governed by a little shift in the bands (Koduru et al. 2018; Bala and Rani 2020).

Lung cancer and its types

Cancer is a disease developed by uncontrolled division of cells in any part of the body. Normally, cells grow and multiply by the means of cell division (a controlled process) and when grow old or there is any mechanical damage, cells die through a process called apoptosis (programmed cell death) but some cells fail to follow the pathway of cell cycle and enter a state of uncontrolled growth and division which leads to the development of cancer (Minna et al. 2002). It is generally of 2 types: malignant in which the tumor cells can migrate to nearby tissues and organs or benign in which the cancer is restricted to a particular place. Cancer has become one of the major causes of death worldwide. There are different types of cancers developed in humans and lung cancer is one of the major types of cancer causing a number of deaths globally. Symptoms of lung cancer includes: shortness of breath, weight loss, cough (worse, vomiting blood, chest pain and feeling tired or weak (Foldbjerg et al. 2011).

Lung cancer is a type of cancer in which cells of lungs or airways undergo division and multiplication at an abnormal rate leading to develop a mass of cells which may not spread to nearby areas. There are 2 major categories of lung cancer non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) as described in Fig. 2. The non-small cell lung cancer is the major type of lung cancer, occupying 80–85% of it, while small cell lung cancer occupies only 10–15% of the cases diagnosed with lung cancer. The NSCLC mainly consists of adenocarcinoma (40%), squamous cell carcinoma (30%) and large cell carcinoma (15%) and SCLC so far can be diagnosed up to 10–15% (He et al. 2016).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Classification of NSCLC and SCLC types of lung cancers that develop from lung epithelial cells

Causes of lung cancer and risk factors

Cigarette smoking

There are numerous causes of lung cancer and cigarette smoking is the number one because that develops cancer in lungs. The smoke contains nearly about 5000 harmful chemical substances such as nicotine, hydrogen cyanide, cadmium, acrolein, acetaldehyde, lead, ethylene oxide, etc. and once inhaled they settle down in the lungs and interact with the cells to cause a change in the physiology of cell and cell cycle by interacting with both sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system causing the release of epinephrine and cholinergic respectively. Epinephrine enters the cell through β- andrenergic receptor and interacts with adenylate cyclase and enters the phosphorylation cascade and activate the MLCP (Myosin Like Chain Phosphatase) to cause bronchodilation whereas cholinergic enters the cell through cholinergic receptor and interacts with guanylate cyclase to ultimately affect the MLCK (Myosin Like Chain Kinase) for broncho constriction as given in Fig. 3 (Malik and Mukherjee 2018; Gowda et al. 2018; Mejia-Mendez et al. 2023; El-Hussein and Hamblin 2017). As per the studies conducted in the United States of America, there are nearly 80–90% of deaths caused by lung cancer due to smoking. While tobacco and its products, such as cigar, pipes increase the risk factor of lung cancer.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effect of smoke exposure from tobacco products inducing cellular responses of the nervous system

Second-hand smoke

Second-hand smoking is also known as passive smoking and is inhaled indirectly i.e. from the cigar, pipes and cigarettes of another person. Even though it is harmful but people who are smoking at present or have smoked for years, are at a higher risk of developing lung cancer (Rozalen et al. 2020) than second-hand smokers or non-smokers (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Incidence of lung cancer and risk factors associated with immune system

Air pollutants

The air we breathe contains number of molecules that are once inhaled; enter the respiratory tract and lungs. Therefore, it is very important to breathe fresh air which is free from any pollutant because they tend to settle in the lung cells. The main pollutant that enters the lung and settle in alveoli are particulate matter with a range of 2.5–10 mu. Due to their extreme small size when inhaled, these are pushed into the alveoli and starts accumulating (Sharma et al. 2024). Such pollutants are released from industries, thermal power plants, automobiles and household appliances. Air pollutants result in 36% of deaths caused globally and that’s why they are referred as ‘invisible killers’. Pollutants like PM (particulate matter), SO2, NO2, O3, etc. can enter the cell and cause DNA damage by methylation of DNA or histone modification (Singh et al. 2022a).

Radon gas

The exposure to radon gas released from soil and rocks by the breakdown of radioactive metals like uranium and radium causes lung cancer. Nearly 20,000 deaths every year is caused by exposure to radon gas (Singh et al. 2022b). There are other harmful chemical substances and carcinogenic agents which can lead to lung cancer such as arsenic, silica, asbestos, diesel, ultraviolet radiations, benzene, aflatoxin (a fungus that contaminates food) etc.

Treatment of lung cancer

Surgery

It involves the surgical removal of the affected area based upon the type, cause and spread of cancer within the lung tissues. The surgeon evaluates the patient initially to gather information about age, overall health, family history and the stages of lung cancer. The surgery for lung cancer is performed where a part of the lung i.e. lung tissue, lobe, or the whole lung is removed from the human body. The major drawback of this method is that there is a chance of cells being left behind after surgery or reoccurrence along with bleeding and pain. In such a scenario, the doctor suggests either to go for radiotherapy or chemotherapy (Wyld et al. 2015; Strobel et al. 2019). Types of surgical removal performed have been described in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Surgical methods for removal of affected cells in lung cancer therapy

Chemotherapy

It is one of the treatments which includes the use of old drugs like alkylation agents (drugs which were used initially for cancer treatment, such as DMS (N, N-dimethylsphingosine), EMS (electrical muscle stimulation), anti-metabolites, plant alkaloids, anti-tumor antibiotics, mitotic inhibitors (stops the mitotic division of cells), etc. These drugs are given to the patients in combination with each other to increase the effectiveness either intravenously or orally with specific doses at a fixed interval of time depending upon the spread of lung cancer (Wang et al. 2023). In people with advanced stages of lung cancer, it is given in combination with radiotherapy to increase the effectiveness and to provide relief from pain as given in Fig. 6 (Okem et al. 2023). The major side effects linked to this treatment are the extreme hair loss, anemia, fatigue, bruising and bleeding, loss of appetite, etc.

Fig.6.

Fig.6

Chemotherapy for lung cancer and side effects

Radiation therapy

The use of radiation to kill cancer cell is one of the treatments available for lung cancer where surgery is not an option. The use of ionizing radiations like X-rays, protons and magnetic resonance induction are exposed to specific body parts and the cancer cells can be killed to a certain extent (Wu et al. 2023). Through PET Scan and CT scan the cancer can be identified with its stage and spread in lungs. A linear beam of X-rays is exposed to the tumor and nearby lung tissues and lymph nodes and these radiations cause changes in genetic material, cell lysis, apoptotic genes and ultimately death of cells. Radiotherapy is provided in many ways either with chemotherapy, before and after the surgery, or to stop metastasis as shown in Fig. 7 (Spohn et al. 2023). There are number of advanced radiotherapies available across the world, such as IMRT (Intensity-modulated radiation therapy), HDR (High dose rated radiation therapy) and 3D-CRT (3D conformational radiotherapy.

Fig.7.

Fig.7

Precision radiotherapy for lung cancer and promising strategies

The disadvantages associated with this are that there is a high risk of damage to nearby cells of the affected area by radiations and there are some side effects of radiations, including fatigue, skin color change, headache, blurry vision and many more (Roeder et al. 2020; Chow et al. 2021).

Immunotherapy

This treatment includes the use of agents that helps our immune system to fight against the cancerous cells. The cancer cell releases certain proteins and toxins that help them hide from the immune cells and additionally they secrete certain chemicals to damage the cells of the immune system. Therefore, anti-tumor antibodies are employed such as ipilimumab, tremelimumab, nivolumab, durvalumumab, avelumumab, atezolizumumab (Esfahani et al. 2020). These are a group of monoclonal antibodies specific against tumor cells which are given to the patients to boost up the immune system and to generate an effective immune response against these cancerous cells. This method of treatment is generally adopted in case of benign tumor where the cancer has spread to other parts of the body. Their release into the bloodstream will help the patient fight the cancer throughout the body (Kennedy and Salama 2020; Banstola et al. 2020). The major drawback related to this method is that it takes a lot of time for our body to recognize those cells and produce antibodies on their own plus it is very costly to generate monoclonal antibodies (Chhabra and Kennedy 2021).

Mechanism involved in immunotherapy

The immune cells have a property to kill the defective cells, while they do not attack the normal cells of the body. The main immune cells of the body are T-cells and they have some protein molecules expressed on their surface called “checkpoints” (Akkın et al. 2021). Cancer cells use these checkpoints to prevent themselves from being recognized and attacked by T-cells. There are certain drugs, such as nivoliumab, cemiplimab and permbrolizumab, which block the PD-1 protein present on the surface of T-cells to detect the cancer cells within the human body and target the cells to suppress the tumor as shown in Fig. 8 (Spohn et al. 2023; Zeng et al. 2021).

Fig.8.

Fig.8

Current landscape of therapeutic resistance; T-cell design and functional mechanism in lung cancer

In addition, the body is administered with monoclonal antibodies like durvulumab and atezolizumab, which target the cancer cells and block the PD-L1 protein expressed on the surface of cancer cells. These monoclonals bind and block the receptor-like protein molecules and further lead to the generation of an active immune response against tumor cells (Li et al. 2021). Various other methods that are presently considered suitable for treatment of lung cancer are targeted drug therapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy and palliative care (Tan et al. 2020). While all of the above metes have certain disadvantages related to them as mentioned above in each. Certainly a new area in medicine called nanomedicine has been developed and it’s found to be very effective in the treatment of cancer with minimum side effects. Therefore, AgNPs are being used widely due to their anti-tumor properties (Igarashi and Sasada 2020).

Silver nanoparticles in treatment of lung cancer

Nanomedicine is being developed recently, which can create a newer era in the world of life sciences. One such nanomedicine is AgNPs as these can be used as a drug carrier in cancer therapy as many changes are observed in cells at the proteomics; genomics and transcriptomic level with the use of AgNPs (Taefehshokr et al. 2020). There are various methods by which silver nanoparticles can act as anti-tumor agents. At the molecular level, AgNPs of varying sizes can provoke DNA fragmentation, protein carbonylation, and lipid membrane peroxidation in cancer cells via enhancing ROS generation (Jabeen et al. 2021). Similarly, biosynthesized silver nanoparticles have the ability to change the transmembrane potential of mitochondria. This is accomplished by producing an excessive production of free radicals, specifically hydrogen peroxide, which ultimately leads to the death of cells through the process of apoptosis (Hembram et al. 2018). A treatment with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) can also inhibit the motility of cancer cells by means of their interaction with metalloproteinases (MMPs), halt the progression of the cell cycle, cause multiple morphological changes (such as blebbing of cytoplasm and chromatin condensation), and modulate the expression of proteins that promote and inhibit apoptosis [Abass Sofi et al. 2022, Kanipandian et al. 2019]

The active targeting of nanoparticles, achieved by conjugating a ligand to their surface, is more effective. This unique ligand can selectively bind to receptors or antigens that are overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells. This method enhances selectivity, hence increasing drug absorption and retention at the tumour location, which in turn lowers systemic toxicity. Active targeting enhances passive targeting by increasing the cellular internalisation of nanoparticles by target cells; nevertheless, tumour localisation remains unaffected and continues to rely on passive diffusion (Gomes et al. 2021).

Moreover, translocation is a common nonspecific way for ultrasmall NPs (less than 5 nm in size) to pass across cellular barriers. However, bulk transport mechanisms such as phagocytosis, pinocytosis, or specific/nonspecific transport mechanisms allow bigger NPs to enter cells. Because of their efficient transport and increased permeability and retention (EPR) properties, nanoparticles (NPs) with a diameter of 10–100 nm may generally be regarded as appropriate for anticancer treatment. Smaller NPs (less than 10 nm in size) may be released from regular arteries quickly and harm healthy cells and tissue before the kidneys can metabolize them (Sukhanova et al. 2018). Consequently, the researcher also found that silver coated with Trimesic Acid (Ag@TMA) (less than 5 nm in size) had the maximum toxicity. Additionally, Ag@TMA1’s action is less selective and can kill any kind of cell, which restricts its use in targeted therapy. Because of their bigger size (30–50 nm), potential EPR impact, and enhanced selectivity towards cancer cells, silver nanocomposites are the most promising candidates for anticancer treatment, according to available data (Nel et al. 2006). In many other findings, graphene oxide coated with silver nanocomposite (Choi et al. 2018) and PVP coated with silver nanoparticles (Hotaby et al. 2017) have been prepared to form a desired nanostructure to have enhanced therapeutic efficiencies. There are various conjugating agents with silver nanoparticles, which include anticancer drugs (Benyettou et al. 2015), antibacterial (Kaur and Kumar 2019), PEG and PVP (Zhao et al. 2019), cellulose (Lin et al. 2015), amino acids (Kumar et al. 2018), proteins (Tai et al. 2014), fatty acids (Rajendran et al. 2019). In the field of biomedical science and therapies, these conjugating agents make it possible for silver nanoparticles to have a wide range of applications (Pucelik et al. 2022).

AgNPs were shown to enhance the expression level of ATM, ATR, CHK1, and CHK2, all of which are genes that are associated with DNA damage in cancer cells. This was discovered in the same investigation. Embelin, a powerful anticancer chemical that is found in Embelia ribes, was utilized in another study as a reducing and capping agent for the manufacture of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). In the same publication, embelin-AgNPs were found to reduce the growth of A549 cells while also causing their death by apoptosis. This inhibition was observed in a dose-dependent manner, ranging from 10 to 200 μg/ML (Jagtap et al. 2022). In a separate investigation, AgNPs produced from stem extracts of medicinal plants, including Commiphora gileadensis, exhibited cytotoxicity against colon cancer cell lines HCT116, HT29, and SW620 in a dose-dependent manner (10–100 μg/mL) (Al-Zahrani et al. 2022). In a separate investigation, AgNPs (~ 10–30 nm) made from Salvia species (i.e., Salvia coccinea, Salvia leucantha, and Salvia splendens) led to the apoptotic death of A549 cells at concentrations of 402, 364, and 418 μg/mL, respectively (Rajendran et al. 2022).

Multiple morphological alterations, including cytoplasmic blebbing, chromatin breakage, and nuclear swelling, were brought about by the presence of AgNPs in the same cell line (Veetil et al. 2024). AgNPs, which ranged in size from three to ten nanometres and were made by combining ethanol extracts from traditional herbal products like garlic (Allium sativum), were found to limit the growth of A549 cells in a dose-dependent manner. This phenomenon was related to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other forms of cellular damage (Padmini et al. 2022). A similar finding was observed when 18–39 nm AgNPs was synthesized using the supernatant of Streptomyces hirsutus strain SNPGA-8. These AgNPs exhibited cytotoxicity against A549 cells, with an IC50 value of 31.4 μg/Ml. In the same study, treatment with AgNPs led to an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in the same cell line (Pallavi et al. 2022). The anticancer efficacy of metallic nanoparticles can fluctuate based on several aspects, including their size, morphology, ζ-potential, and synthesis conditions. Small nanoparticles (< 100 nm) are recognized as potent anticancer treatments because to their size, which facilitates efficient distribution, enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, biocompatibility, and stability (Singh et al. 2017; Gavas et al. 2021). Conversely, big nanoparticles (> 200 nm) are inclined to agglomerate in the liver and persist in the bloodstream for extended durations (Alexis et al. 2008).

Photodynamic theory/ photosensitizers

The AgNPs due to their extreme small size can easily enter the tumor cell microenvironment through diffusion, phagocytosis or endocytosis. Upon uptake by tumor cells, the electromagnetic radiations generally in infrared wavelength are focused onto them (Kessel 2023; Algorri et al. 2021). Due to the hypothermal activity of silver nanoparticles, in the presence of light or photons, they get activated upon absorbing the chemical energy and convert the same into heat energy further causing hyperthermia in cells and ultimately leading to cell necrosis. Moreover, these AgNPs also form singlet oxygen species, which increase toxicity in cells as given in Fig. 9 (Niculescu and Grumezescu 2021).

Fig.9.

Fig.9

Targeted photodynamic therapy for cancer using functionalized silver nanomaterials

Reactive oxygen species

Silver nanoparticles when invade the cell organelles of tumor cells, cause proteogenomic changes in tumor cells through redox metabolism. Mitochondria, nucleus and other redox reactive organelles provide microenvironment for the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as super radical O2, ozone O3, single oxygen [O], H2O2, peroxy radical and alkoxy radical etc. (Nakamura and Takada 2021).

Mechanism

Due to the presence of high levels of antioxidants in cancer cell, there is no generation of reactive oxygen species, therefore, silver nanoparticles reduce the antioxidant level and thus increase the formation of ROS and activates mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway. It causes the downregulation of Bcl-2 which is an anti-apoptotic gene and upregulation of Bax a pro-apoptotic gene (Sahoo et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2021; Sarmiento-Salinas et al. 2021). Bioconjugated form of silver nanoparticles i.e. fructose-coated AgNPs lead to the opening of mitochondrial membrane and realease of cytochrome c, which will act upon procaspase, which further activates caspase 3 that regulates the p53 genes mediated apoptosis leading to the death of cancer cells. Peroxisomes, NADPH Oxidase, and warburg effect within cells promote the release of ROS. Not only the disruption of mitochondrial membrane, AgNPs cause organelle damage, oxidative stress, mRNA and DNA damage within the cells as described in Fig. 10. ROS also changes the cellular pH of cancer cells causing cellular stiffness. A cell differentiated to human skin is exposed to AgNPs causes the release of silver ions and increasing the cellular toxicity (Kotsafti et al. 2020; Harris and DeNicola 2020; Jomova et al. 2023).

Fig.10.

Fig.10

Continuous exposure of AgNPs or silver ions generate ROS overproduction, transcriptional reprogramming, and apoptosis mediated through p53 pathway

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity

The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity can be generated by changing the concentration of AgNPs. The higher release of Ag+ ions in the cell can cause oxidative stress among the cells, which might lead to DNA damage, mRNA damage, change in the expression of cellular matrix and metal proteins. Initially, Ag2SO4, AgNO3 and AgClO4 were the chemicals that were used as a source of silver induced toxicity in cells but due to their adverse effects, limited specificity, development of drug resistance and possibility of relapse, the use of silver nanoparticles attracted significant attention of the scientific community. AgNPs coated with PVP can be used as cytotoxicity and genotoxicity agents along with a targeted drug delivery system and these combined properties make them as anti-tumor in nature (Foldbjerg et al. 2011; Swift and Golsteyn 2014; Zounkova et al. 2007).

Conclusion and future perspective

The role of nanotechnology in biomedical applications is vast, especially in the treatment of a wide variety of cancers. Cancer has been causing a number of deaths all around the globe and as per the recent estimation, around 29 million people are supposed to be diagnosed with cancer by 2040 with around 2.5 million cases recorded for lung cancer. But due to continuous advancements in medical science, the mortality rate can be decreased (Samarth et al. 2018). NPs are being currently exploited for their use in the clinical treatment of cancer. As compared to traditional methods like surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, combined therapies, NPs are found to be more effective. Both organic (carbon nanoparticles, DNA origami) and inorganic NPs (AuNPs, PtNPs, AgNPs, etc.) can be used for lung cancer treatment (Rai et al. 2014; Patra et al. 2014). Silver can generate cytotoxicity in cells, cause oxidative stress due to the generation of ROS, increased the expression of apoptotic genes such as p21, p53, Bax, activation of caspase 9, 6 and 3, etc. and hence Ag is used to generate metal nanoparticles. AgNPs are found to have improved physicochemical properties that can cure cancer to a greater extent. Also AgNPs with some conjugates like PEG, capping agents and in combination with advanced T-cell immunotherapies are associated with improved biocompatibility, pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting (Kar et al. 2024; Abdel-Fattah and Ali 2018). Apart from, chemical and biological approach, Bhasma in Ayurveda has also shown enormous support in formulating metal-based formulations, created by intricate pharmacological methods that integrate plants and transform them into an appropriate form. Recently, the fabrication of Rajat Bhasma has demonstrated proliferative activity against many malignant cell lines, beneficial interactions with HIV, and bactericidal effects (Sharma et al. 2016). The Rajat Bhasma was synthesized and characterized, showing a reddish-brown color, with the average particle size of 10–100 nm, and a quasi-spherical shape. The anticancer activity of Rajat Bhasma reveals the potent anticancer activity against MCF-7 cell lines (Naikare et al. 2022). Thus, metal-based nanomedicines can provide a scientific foundation by drawing on the fact that Bhasma contains submicronic or nanoparticles that improve bioavailability and could be the need of future research. Research is being carried out to develop hybrid NPs that are more suitable for drug targeting. Further studies about various biological characteristics of different cancers are underway so that more precise treatments can be made available in the near future and, moreover, one can engineer NPs that use targeting moieties for cancer cells. Nano vaccines are also into play to interact with the immune system and fight against tumors way better than traditional immunotherapies, but their clinical trial results are unsatisfactory. A further crosstalk between NPs based treatment and targeted immunity needs to be exploited.

Funding

No funding was received for the said study.

Declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Manoj Singh, Email: manoj.singh@mmumullana.org, Email: lookformanoj@gmail.com.

Anil Kumar Sharma, Email: anibiotech18@gmail.com.

References:

  1. Abass Sofi M, Sunitha S, Ashaq Sofi M, Khadheer Pasha SK, Choi D (2022) An overview of antimicrobial and anticancer potential of silver nanoparticles. J King Saud Univ. 10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101791 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdel-Fattah WI, Ali GW (2018) On the anti-cancer activities of silver nanoparticles. J Appli Biotechnol Bioeng 5(1):43–46 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed A, Usman M, Ji Z, Rafiq M, Yu B, Shen Y, Cong H (2023) Nature-inspired biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles for antibacterial applications. Mater Today Chem 27:101339 [Google Scholar]
  4. Akkın S, Varan G, Bilensoy E (2021) A review on cancer immunotherapy and applications of nanotechnology to chemo immunotherapy of different cancers. Molecules 26(11):3382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK, Farokhzad OC (2008) Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 5:505–515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Algorri JF, Ochoa M, Roldan-Varona P, Rodriguez-Cobo L, Lopez-Higuera JM (2021) Photodynamic therapy: a compendium of latest reviews. Cancers 13(17):4447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Zahrani SA, Bhat RS, Al-Onazi MA, Alwhibi MS, Soliman DA, Aljebrin NA, Al-Suhaibani LS, Daihan SA (2022) Anticancer potential of biogenic silver nanoparticles using the stem extract of Commiphora gileadensis against human colon cancer cells. Green Process Synth 11:435–444 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bala A, Rani G (2020) A review on phytosynthesis, affecting factors and characterization techniques of silver nanoparticles designed by green approach. Int Nano Lett 10(3):159–176 [Google Scholar]
  9. Banstola A, Jeong JH, Yook S (2020) Immunoadjuvants for cancer immunotherapy: a review of recent developments. Acta Biomater 114:16–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Benyettou F, Rezgui R, Ravaux F, Jaber T, Blumer K, Jouiad M, Motte L, Olsen JC, Platas-Iglesias C, Magzoub M, Trabolsi A (2015) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles for the dual delivery of doxorubicin and alendronate to cancer cells. J Mater Chem B 3(36):7237–7245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chhabra N, Kennedy J (2021) A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity: immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Med Toxicol 17(4):411–424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Choi YJ, Gurunathan S, Kim JH (2018) Graphene oxide–silver nanocomposite enhances cytotoxic and apoptotic potential of salinomycin in human ovarian cancer stem cells (OvCSCs): a novel approach for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci 19(3):710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chow R, Kang M, Wei S, Choi JI, Press RH, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Cengel KA, Lin H, Simone CB (2021) Flash radiation therapy: review of the literature and considerations for future research and proton therapy flash trials. Appl Radiat Oncol 10(2):16–21 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dhaka A, Mali SC, Sharma S, Trivedi R (2023) A review on biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their potential applications. Results Chem. 10.1016/j.rechem.2023.101108 [Google Scholar]
  15. El-Hussein A, Hamblin MR (2017) ROS generation and DNA damage with photo-inactivation mediated by silver nanoparticles in lung cancer cell line. IET Nanobiotechnol 11(2):173–178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Esfahani K, Roudaia L, Buhlaiga NA, Rincon SV, Papneja N, Miller WH (2020) A review of cancer immunotherapy: from the past, to the present, to the future. Curr Oncol 27(s2):87–97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Foldbjerg R, Dang DA, Autrup H (2011) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in the human lung cancer cell line, A549. Arch Toxicol 85:743–750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Foulkes R, Asgari M, Curtis A, Hoskins C (2019) Silver-nanoparticle-mediated therapies in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2(4):1758–1772 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gavas S, Quazi S, Karpiński TM (2021) Nanoparticles for cancer therapy: current progress and challenges. Nanoscale Res Lett 16:173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gomes HIO, Martins CSM, Prior JAV (2021) Silver nanoparticles as carriers of anticancer drugs for efficient target treatment of cancer cells. Nanomaterials 11(4):964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gowda SS, Rajasowmiya S, Vadivel V, Devi SB, Jerald AC, Marimuthu S, Devipriya N (2018) Gallic acid–coated sliver nanoparticle alters the expression of radiation-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non–small lung cancer cells. Toxicol In Vitro 52:170–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gul AR, Shaheen F, Rafique R, Bal J, Waseem S, Park TJ (2021) Grass-mediated biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their drug delivery evaluation: a biocompatible anti-cancer therapy. Chem Eng J 407:127202 [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris IS, DeNicola GM (2020) The complex interplay between antioxidants and ROS in cancer. Trends Cell Biol 30(6):440–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. He Y, Du Z, Ma S, Liu Y, Li D, Huang H, Jiang S, Cheng S, Wu W, Zhang K, Zheng X (2016) Effects of green-synthesized silver nanoparticles on lung cancer cells in vitro and grown as xenograft tumors in vivo. Inter J Nanomed. 10.2147/IJN.S103695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hembram KC, Kumar R, Kandha L, Parhi PK, Kundu CN, Bindhani BK (2018) Therapeutic prospective of plant-induced silver nanoparticles: application as antimicrobial and anticancer agent. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 46(Suppl):S38–S51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hotaby WE, Sherif HHA, Hemdan BA, Khalil WA, Khalil SKH (2017) Assessment of in situ-prepared polyvinylpyrrolidone-silver nanocomposite for antimicrobial applications. Acta Phys Pol A. 10.12693/APhysPolA.131.1554 [Google Scholar]
  27. Huy TQ, Huyen P, Le AT, Tonezzer M (2020) Recent advances of silver nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Anti-Cancer Agents Med Chem 20(11):1276–1287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Igarashi Y, Sasada T (2020) Cancer vaccines: toward the next breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy. J Immunol Res. 10.1155/2020/5825401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ingale AG, Chaudhari AN (2013) Biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles and potential applications: an eco-friendly approach. J Nanomed Nanotechol 4(165):1–7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jabeen S, Qureshi R, Munazir M, Maqsood M, Munir M, Shah SS, Rahim BZ (2021) Application of green synthesized silver nanoparticles in cancer treatment–a critical review. Materials Res Express 8(9):092001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jagtap RR, Garud A, Puranik SS, Rudrapal M, Ansari MA, Alomary MN, Alshamrani M, Salawi A, Almoshari Y, Khan J (2022) Biofabrication of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Embelin for effective therapeutic management of lung cancer. Front Nutr. 10.3389/fnut.2022.960674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jayachandran P, Ilango S, Suseela V, Nirmaladevi R, Shaik MR, Khan M, Khan M, Shaik B (2023) Green synthesized silver nanoparticle-loaded liposome-based nanoarchitectonics for cancer management: in vitro drug release analysis. Biomedicines 11(1):217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jin C, Wang K, Oppong-Gyebi A, Hu J (2020) Application of nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis and therapy–a mini-review. Int J Med Sci 17(18):2964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jomova K, Raptova R, Alomar SY, Alwasel SH, Nepovimova E, Kuca K, Valko M (2023) Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: chronic diseases and aging. Arch Toxicol 97(10):2499–2574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kanipandian N, Li D, Kannan S (2019) Induction of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in A549 lung cancer cells using silver nanoparticles from Gossypium hirsutum and evaluation of in vivo toxicity. Biotechnol Rep 23:e00339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kar A, Giri L, Almalki WH, Singh S, Sahebkar A, Kesharwani P, Dandela R (2024) Conclusion and future prospective of silver nanoparticles. In Silver Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Academic Press, Amsterdam [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaur A, Kumar R (2019) Enhanced bactericidal efficacy of polymer stabilized silver nanoparticles in conjugation with different classes of antibiotics. RSC Adv 9(2):1095–1105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kennedy LB, Salama AK (2020) A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity. CA Cancer J Clin 70(2):86–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kessel D (2023) Photodynamic therapy: critical PDT theory. Photochem Photobiol 99(2):199–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim D, Amatya R, Hwang S, Lee S, Min KA, Shin MC (2021) BSA-silver nanoparticles: a potential multimodal therapeutics for conventional and photo thermal treatment of skin cancer. Pharmaceutics 13(4):575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Koduru JR, Kailasa SK, Bhamore JR, Kim KH, Dutta T, Vellingiri K (2018) Phytochemical-assisted synthetic approaches for silver nanoparticles antimicrobial applications: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 256:326–339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kotsafti A, Scarpa M, Castagliuolo I, Scarpa M (2020) Reactive oxygen species and antitumor immunity—from surveillance to evasion. Cancers 12(7):1748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kumar M, Bansal K, Gondil VS, Sharma S, Jain DVS, Chhibber S, Sharma RK, Wangoo N (2018) Synthesis, characterization, mechanistic studies and antimicrobial efficacy of biomolecule capped and pH modulated silver nanoparticles. J Mol Liq 249:1145–1150 [Google Scholar]
  44. Li F, Li C, Cai X, Xie Z, Zhou L, Cheng B, Zhong R, Xiong S, Li J, Chen Z, Yu Z (2021) The association between CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the clinical outcome of cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin S, Chen L, Huang L, Cao S, Luo X, Liu K (2015) Novel antimicrobial chitosan–cellulose composite films bioconjugated with silver nanoparticles. Ind Crops Prod 70(2015):395–403 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mali SC, Dhaka A, Githala CK, Trivedi R (2017) Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Celastrus paniculatus Willd. leaf extract and their photocatalytic and antifungal properties. Biotechnol Rep 27:e00518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mali SC, Raj S, Trivedi R (2019) Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Enicostemma axillare (Lam.) leaf extract. Biochem Biophys Rep. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Malik P, Mukherjee TK (2018) Recent advances in gold and silver nanoparticle based therapies for lung and breast cancers. Int J Pharm 553(1–2):483–509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mejia-Mendez JL, Lopez-Mena ER, Sanchez-Arreola E (2023) Activities against lung cancer of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles: a review. Biomedicines 11(2):389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Minna JD, Roth JA, Gazdar AF (2002) Focus on lung cancer. Cancer Cell 1(1):49–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Naikare TS, Rao KS, Kulkarni RM, Sakhitha KS, Singh TR, Chaudhari M, Ingole AP (2022) Synthesis and characterization of rajat bhasma and its in-vitro anti-cancer activity. NeuroQuantology 20(14):171–177 [Google Scholar]
  52. Nakamura H, Takada K (2021) Reactive oxygen species in cancer: current findings and future directions. Cancer Sci 112(10):3945–3952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Nguyen NP, Dang NT, Doan L, Nguyen TT (2023) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles: from conventional to ‘modern’ methods—a review. Processes 11(9):2617 [Google Scholar]
  55. Niculescu AG, Grumezescu AM (2021) Photodynamic therapy—an up-to-date review. Appl Sci 11(8):3626 [Google Scholar]
  56. Noorbazargan H, Amintehrani S, Dolatabadi A, Mashayekhi A, Khayam N, Moulavi P, Naghizadeh M, Mirzaie A, Mirzaei RF, Kavousi M (2021) Anti-cancer & anti-metastasis properties of bioorganic-capped silver nanoparticles fabricated from Juniperus chinensis extract against lung cancer cells. AMB Express 11(1):61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Okem A, Henstra C, Lambert M, Hayeshi R (2023) A review of the pharmacodynamic effect of chemo-herbal drug combinations therapy for cancer treatment. Med Drug Discov 17:100147 [Google Scholar]
  58. Padmini R, Nallal VUM, Razia M, Sivaramakrishnan S, Alodaini HA, Hatamleh AA, Al-Dosary MA, Ranganathan V, Chung WJ (2022) Cytotoxic effect of silver nanoparticles synthesized from ethanolic extract of Allium sativum on A549 lung cancer cell line. J King Saud Univ 34:102001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pallavi SS, Rudayni HA, Bepari A, Niazi SK, Nayaka S (2022) green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Streptomyces Hirsutus strain SNPGA-8 and their characterization, antimicrobial activity, and anticancer activity against human lung carcinoma cell line A549. Saudi J Biol Sci 29:228–238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Patra CR, Mukherjee S, Kotcherlakota R (2014) Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles: a step forward for cancer theranostics? Nanomedicine 9(10):1445–1448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pucelik B, Sułek A, Borkowski M, Barzowska A, Kobielusz M, Dąbrowski JM (2022) Synthesis and characterization of size- and charge-tunable silver nanoparticles for selective anticancer and antibacterial treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:14981–14996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rai M, Kon K, Ingle A, Duran N, Galdiero S, Galdiero M (2014) Broad-spectrum bioactivities of silver nanoparticles: the emerging trends and future prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:1951–1961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Raj M, Singh M, Kumar V, Devi T, Upadhyay SK, Mishra P, Kumar S, Yadav M, Sehrawat N, Kumari M (2023) Gluconic acid: strategies for microbial production using organic waste and applications. Phys Sci Rev. 10.1515/psr-2022-0163 [Google Scholar]
  64. Raja G, Jang YK, Suh JS, Kim HS, Ahn SH, Kim TJ (2020) Microcellular environmental regulation of silver nanoparticles in cancer therapy: a critical review. Cancers 12(3):664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rajendran K, Anwar A, Khan NA, Aslam Z, Shah MR, Siddiqui R (2019) Oleic acid coated silver nanoparticles showed better in vitro amoebicidal effects against Naegleria fowleri than Amphotericin B. ACS Chem Neurosci 11(16):2431–2437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rajendran R, Pullani S, Thavamurugan S, Radhika R, Lakshmi Prabha A (2022) Green fabrication of silver nanoparticles from Salvia species extracts: characterization and anticancer activities against A549 human lung cancer cell line. Appl Nanosci 7:1–14 [Google Scholar]
  67. Reddy JM, Anitha R, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T (2019) Characterization of cumin oil mediated silver nanoparticles using UV-visible spectrophotometer and TEM. Res J Pharm Technol 12(10):4931–4933 [Google Scholar]
  68. Roeder F, Meldolesi E, Gerum S, Valentini V, Rodel C (2020) Recent advances in (chemo-) radiation therapy for rectal cancer: a comprehensive review. Radiat Oncol 15(1):262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rozalen M, Sanchez-Polo M, Fernandez-Perales M, Widmann TJ, Rivera-Utrilla J (2020) Synthesis of controlled-size silver nanoparticles for the administration of methotrexate drug and its activity in colon and lung cancer cells. RSC Adv 10(18):10646–10660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sahoo BM, Banik BK, Borah P, Jain A (2022) Reactive oxygen species (ROS): key components in cancer therapies. Anti-Cancer Agents Med Chem 22(2):215–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Samarth RM, Khan T, Srivas S, Mishra PK, Tiwari RR (2018) Evaluation of cyclophosphamide-induced genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in cultured human lymphocytes. J Radiat Cancer Res 9(1):28–32 [Google Scholar]
  72. Sarmiento-Salinas FL, Perez-Gonzalez A, Acosta-Casique A, Ix-Ballote A, Diaz A, Trevino S, Rosas-Murrieta NH, Millan-Perez-Pena L, Maycotte P (2021) Reactive oxygen species: role in carcinogenesis, cancer cell signaling and tumor progression. Life Sci 284:119942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Shaaban MT, Ghaly MF, Fahmi SM (2021) Antibacterial activities of hexadecanoic acid methyl ester and green-synthesized silver nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J Basic Microbiol 61(6):557–568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sharma R, Bhatt A, Thakur M (2016) Physicochemical characterization and antibacterial activity of Rajata Bhasma and silver nanoparticle. Ayu 37(1):71–75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sharma A, Singh M, Sharma V, Vashishth A, Raj M, Upadhyay SK, Singh S, Ramniwas S, Dhama K, Sharma AK, Bhatia SK (2024) Current paradigms in employing self-assembled structures: drug delivery implications with improved therapeutic potential. Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 234:113745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Singh R, Kundu GC, Chopade BA (2017) Green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles using Acinetobacter sp. SW30: optimization, characterization and its anticancer activity in breast cancer cells. Int J Nanomed. 10.2147/IJN.S139212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Singh M, Kumar V, Raj M, Roy S, Jarora V, Sharma AK (2022a) Reforming roadmap for vector control strategies for malaria elimination and eradication from transmission in context to the current evidence. Inter J Mosq Res 9(3):36–40 [Google Scholar]
  78. Singh M, Kumar V, Gupta S, Devi N, Thakur V, Upadhyay SK, Raj M, Kaur S (2022b) Nanoparticle based drug delivery system for diabetes mellitus a short review. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 1:142–147 [Google Scholar]
  79. Singh M, Thakur V, Kumar V, Raj M, Gupta S, Devi N, Upadhyay SK, Macho M, Banerjee A, Ewe D (2022c) Silver nanoparticles and its mechanistic insight for chronic wound healing: review on recent progress. Molecules 27:5587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Spohn SK, Draulans C, Kishan AU, Spratt D, Ross A, Maurer T, Tilki D, Berlin A, Blanchard P, Collins S, Bronsert P (2023) Genomic classifiers in personalized prostate cancer radiation therapy approaches: a systematic review and future perspectives based on international consensus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 116(3):503–520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jaeger D, Buechler MW (2019) Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16(1):11–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sukhanova A, Bozrova S, Sokolov P, Berestovoy M, Karaulov A, Nabiev I (2018) Dependence of nanoparticle toxicity on their physical and chemical properties. Nanoscale Res Lett 13:44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sundeep D, Vijaya Kumar T, Rao PS, Ravikumar R, Gopala Krishna A (2017) Green synthesis and characterization of Ag nanoparticles from Mangifera indica leaves for dental restoration and antibacterial applications. Prog Biomater 6(1):57–66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Swift LH, Golsteyn RM (2014) Genotoxic anti-cancer agents and their relationship to DNA damage, mitosis, and checkpoint adaptation in proliferating cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci 15(3):3403–3431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Taefehshokr N, Baradaran B, Baghbanzadeh A, Taefehshokr S (2020) Promising approaches in cancer immunotherapy. Immunobiology 225(2):151875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tai JT, Lai CS, Ho HC, Yeh YS, Wang HF, Ho RM, Tsai DH (2014) Protein–silver nanoparticle interactions to colloidal stability in acidic environments. Langmuir 30(43):12755–12764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Takac P, Michalkova R, Cizmarikova M, Bedlovicova Z, Balazova L, Takacova G (2023) The role of silver nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer: are there any perspectives for the future? Life 13(2):466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Tan S, Li D, Zhu X (2020) Cancer immunotherapy: pros, cons and beyond. Biomed Pharmacother 124:109821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Vanlalveni C, Lallianrawna S, Biswas A, Selvaraj M, Changmai B, Rokhum SL (2021) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extracts and their antimicrobial activities: a review of recent literature. RSC Adv 11(5):2804–2837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Veetil VT, Jayakrishnan V, Aravindan V (2024) Biogenic silver nanoparticles incorporated hydrogel beads for anticancer and antibacterial activities. Sci Rep 14:27269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang Y, Wu X, Ren Z, Li Y, Zou W, Chen J, Wang H (2023) Overcoming cancer chemotherapy resistance by the induction of ferroptosis. Drug Resist Updat 66:100916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wu XY, Zhai J, Huan XK, Xu WW, Tian J, Farhood B (2023) A systematic review of the therapeutic potential of resveratrol during colorectal cancer chemotherapy. Mini Rev Med Chem 23(10):1137–1152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wyld L, Audisio RA, Poston GJ (2015) The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12(2):115–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Yousaf H, Mehmood A, Ahmad KS, Raffi M (2020) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their applications as an alternative antibacterial and antioxidant agents. Mater Sci Eng C 112:110901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zeng Y, Xiang Y, Sheng R, Tomas H, Rodrigues J, Gu Z, Zhang H, Gong Q, Luo K (2021) Polysaccharide-based nanomedicine for cancer immunotherapy: a review. Bioact Mater 6(10):3358–3382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang J, Duan D, Song ZL, Liu T, Hou Y, Fang J (2021) Small molecules regulating reactive oxygen species homeostasis for cancer therapy. Med Res Rev 41(1):342–394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhao J, Liu P, Ma J, Li D, Yang H, Chen W, Jiang Y (2019) Enhancement of radiosensitization by silver nanoparticles functionalized with polyethylene glycol and aptamer As1411 for glioma irradiation therapy. Int J Nanomed 14:9483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zounkova R, Odraska P, Dolezalova L, Hilscherova K, Marsalek B, Blaha L (2007) Ecotoxicity and genotoxicity assessment of cytostatic pharmaceuticals. Environ Toxicol Chem 26(10):2208–2214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES