Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018 Aug 1;27(8):667–675. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1501471

N-acetyl cysteine in the treatment of alcohol use disorder in patients with liver disease: Rationale for further research

Kirsten C Morley a, Andrew Baillie b, Wim Van Den Brink c, Kate E Chitty d, Kathleen Brady e, Sudie E Back f, Devanshi Seth g, Greg Sutherland h, Lorenzo Leggio i,j, Paul S Haber a,k
PMCID: PMC12434407  NIHMSID: NIHMS2107575  PMID: 30019966

Abstract

Introduction:

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the leading cause of alcohol-related death and one of the most common forms of liver disease. Abstinence from alcohol is crucial to reducing morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. However, there are few pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder suitable for those with significant liver disease.

Areas Covered:

This paper presents a rationale for investigating the use of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) to promote abstinence or reduce heavy alcohol consumption for patients with an alcohol use disorder, particularly in the presence of liver disease. NAC is an antioxidant with glutamatergic modulating and anti-inflammatory properties. Evidence is emerging that oxidative stress, neuro-inflammation and dysregulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission play a key role in alcohol use disorder. Similarly, oxidative stress is known to contribute to ALD. We outline the studies that have investigated NAC to reduce alcohol consumption including preclinical and clinical studies. We also review the evidence for NAC in other addictions as well as psychiatric and physical comorbidities associated with alcohol use disorders.

Expert Opinion:

NAC is low cost, well-tolerated and could have promise for the treatment of alcohol use disorder in the presence of liver disease. Clinical trials directly examining efficacy in this population are required.

Keywords: Alcoholic liver disease, N-acetyl cysteine, alcohol use disorder, pharmacotherapy, comorbidity

1. Introduction

Alcohol misuse is linked to over 200 physical and mental conditions [1] and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The liver is commonly affected by regular or heavy alcohol use and patients with alcohol-related liver disease present a particular clinical challenge [2]. In terms of alcohol-attributable deaths, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) stands as the most common cause [3] and abstinence from alcohol is key to reducing this mortality. In this paper, we present a rationale for studies investigating N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) to increase abstinence in alcohol use disorder (AUD) in the presence of ALD.

2. Alcohol use disorder and alcoholic liver disease

AUD, as characterized by the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-V, is a loss of control over alcohol consumption persisting for at least 12 months and including medical and psychosocial harms from alcohol use. This may or may not include alcohol-dependence criteria from the previous DSM-IV definition characterized by a physiological dependence on alcohol with onset of withdrawal symptoms following abrupt cessation of drinking. The development of AUD typically involves repeated exposure to alcohol, tolerance, symptoms of withdrawal and escalating alcohol consumption.

Alcohol consumption is a major cause of liver disease worldwide and half of all global liver cirrhosis deaths are related to alcohol [1]. Specifically, ALD can be grouped into three diseases that frequently coexist: alcoholic fatty liver or steatosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and alcoholic cirrhosis whereby cirrhosis describes irreversible hepatic fibrosis associated with disruption of hepatic circulation and regeneration [2]. The impact of ALD on hospital admission rates is on the rise in several countries including Australia and United States [4]. However, despite the prominent burden of ALD, very little progress has been made with regards to treatment.

Abstinence from alcohol is a key factor in reducing ALD mortality. Alcohol consumption, even in low doses, after the onset of liver disease, increases the risk of severe consequences [5]. The ideal treatment for AUD in the presence of ALD should therefore aim for abstinence and the prevention of relapse. However, current approaches to the treatment of AUD have limited efficacy and use, and this is particularly the case for those with clinically significant liver damage [6]. Moreover, psychosocial interventions have been observed to have limited success in maintaining abstinence from alcohol in patients with chronic liver disease [7]. Thus, an effective pharmacotherapy aimed at achieving and maintaining abstinence that does not compromise liver function is required for this clinical population.

3. Pharmacotherapy for AUD in the presence of ALD

Pharmacological treatment of AUD is now widely accepted and medications such as acamprosate, oral naltrexone, and disulfiram are approved for treatment of AUD in the United States, Europe, and Australia. Furthermore, extended-release injectable naltrexone is approved in the United States, oral nalmefene is approved in Europe, and other medications (e.g. topiramate, gabapentin, baclofen, and prazosin) are sometime used off-label for AUD, especially in some specific countries. A metaanalysis of 122 randomized controlled trials reported only modest but significant effects for naltrexone and acamprosate to reduce the return to drinking (with moderate support for nalmefene and topiramate) [8]. The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent return to any drinking for was 12 and 20 for acamprosate and oral naltrexone respectfully. The NNT to prevent return to heavy drinking was 12 for oral naltrexone.

With regards to ALD, disulfiram and oral naltrexone are extensively metabolized by the liver and both are contraindicated in patients with clinically relevant liver diseases [9]. There is some debate in the literature regarding the clinical significance of liver toxicity from naltrexone treatment in ALD [10] particularly in mild cases. However, use is still limited in ALD patients with advanced liver disease and caution is nonetheless still recommended [6]. With regards to acamprosate, although there is no evidence to suggest it is unsafe in the presence of liver disease, the regimen of six tablets per day along with modest efficacy indicates the need for further medication development. While topiramate is a promising agent for reducing heavy drinking days, it may induce hyperammonemia and cause significant changes in hepatic function tests [11]. Moreover, topiramate may be associated with cognitive impairment and mood changes which can confound a diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy in advanced liver disease [6]. It is thus less ideal for use in ALD patients. Nalmefene could be a potential option for patients with ALD given that it has been reported to have similar efficacy to naltrexone in the treatment of AUD but without documented hepatotoxicity [12]. However, the safety of nalmefene in the case of advanced liver disease is not yet established.

Baclofen has emerged as popular pharmacotherapy and while results are somewhat mixed, a recent metaanalysis has reported some efficacy, particularly in patients with higher levels of alcohol consumption before randomization [13]. There have been only two formal placebo-controlled studies of an alcohol pharmacotherapy in patients specifically diagnosed with ALD and both of these trials demonstrated efficacy of baclofen at low to medium doses 30–75 mg/day [14,15]. Some studies have observed an adverse event profile including fatigue, sleepiness, and sedation in medium to higher doses 75–150 mg/day [14,16]. It is important to note the risk of overdose following deliberate self-poisoning with baclofen [14,17]. This can be a concern in the case of comorbid psychiatric conditions such as bipolar or borderline personality disorder [18,19]. Since the emergence of interest in baclofen there have been increased reports to poison control agencies both in Australia [17] and France [20]. This uncertain harm-benefit balance arguably precludes widespread use of baclofen in the community whereby it is not recommended for patients with mood disorders or risk of deliberate self-poisoning. Accordingly, there are few safe and effective medications aimed at reducing alcohol consumption for ALD patients that can be widely prescribed.

4. N-acetyl cysteine

NAC is a low cost, antioxidant with also antiinflammatory and glutamatergic modulating properties. NAC has an established record of being safe and well tolerated [21]. It is currently used in many countries for the symptomatic treatment of cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [22], and to reverse hepatic oxidative stress following acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure [21]. NAC is a cysteine precursor that activates the cystine-glutamate exchanger (xc) which is an important means for preserving extrasynaptic glutamate concentrations [23,24]. NAC also normalizes expression of the glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1), a high-affinity astroglial glutamate transporter, which also is a key process to restoring glutamate homeostasis. NAC replenishes the intracellular levels of glutathione (GSH), is a fundamental antioxidant synthesized in cells, and interacts with reactive oxygen species [25]. For these reasons, NAC has emerged as a promising agent in treating disorders associated with glutamatergic dysregulation, oxidative stress, and inflammation including hepatic diseases [26], psychiatric disorders [27] and, more recently, addictive disorders [28] (see below for detail).

5. Neurobiological mediators of AUD

5.1. Glutamatergic signaling

Glutamate is a critical regulator of subcortical plasticity during all phases of alcohol consumption, with dysregulation of cortical glutamatergic neurotransmission observed with heavy drinking [29]. Preclinical studies show that chronic alcohol intake leads to reduced glial GLT-1 protein levels, abnormalities in glutamate receptor signaling (e.g. mGluR2/3) [30], and disruption of glutamatergic input from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to reward areas [29]. Preclinical studies also show that the glutamatergic system plays a crucial role in alcohol seeking behaviors. For example, cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol-seeking behaviors and alcohol intake in rodents are attenuated by glutamate receptor antagonists [31] and also compounds that modulate GLT-1 [32]. Glutamate transporters remove glutamate from the synaptic cleft and control extracellular glutamate levels that moderate the motivation to seek alcohol [33]. Clinical studies using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have found significant alterations in glutamate levels in alcohol-dependent individuals, whereby an increase or decrease depends on the brain region examined and also the duration of abstinence duration prior to scanning [34,35]. Cortical glutamate in alcohol patients has also been demonstrated to be modulated by the presentation of alcohol cues [36] and by the administration of acamprosate [37]. Thus, agents that modulate GLT-1 and restore glutamate homeostasis and the dysregulation of glutamatergic transmission between prefrontal and reward brain regions have become candidates for potential pharmacotherapies in the treatment of AUD [37].

Preclinical studies demonstrate that NAC administration reverses glutamate dysregulation induced by chronic cocaine use, including normalization of the two glial processes critical for maintaining glutamate homeostasis: cystine-glutamate exchange [38] and glutamate transport via the GLT-1 [39]. Clinical studies using MRS have reported that NAC administration reduces dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) glutamate activity in cocaine users but not healthy controls [40]. This indicates that NAC normalizes cortical glutamate levels in the case of excessive glutamatergic signaling such as observed in patients with substance use disorder. There have been no studies examining NAC on glutamate neurotransmission in alcohol patients.

5.2. Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation

There is also an important link emerging between the neuropsychological changes associated with AUD and modulations in the immune system induced by chronic alcohol use. Alcohol consumption activates the toll-like receptor system leading to a “leaky gut” triggering a leakage of lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycans from the gut lumen [41]. This also leads to the circulation of microbial products that stimulate immune cells to secrete proinflammatory cytokines in the periphery (notably interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which then prime brain microglia and astrocytes to release central nervous system cytokines) [42]. Preclinical studies demonstrate that this alcohol-induced chronic proinflammatory state leads to oxidative stress with reduced GSH and diminished neural function [43]. Neuroinflammation also modifies several neurotransmitter systems important in addiction including the expression of serotonin transporters, GABA receptors, and also glutamatergic neurotransmission via the kynurenine pathway [44]. Preclinical studies report peripheral immune system changes occurring with chronic alcohol use [45] and already at the hazardous drinking stage [46]. Clinical studies report increased levels of peripheral cytokines in patients with AUD, compared to healthy controls [47]. Recent evidence shows that expression of brain translocator protein, a marker of activated glia, is associated with cognitive impairment [48] and alcohol-dependence severity [49].

Preclinical studies show that NAC prevents neuroinflammation induced by chronic alcohol consumption as measured by a decrease in proinflammatory cytokines and increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines in the brain [50]. NAC has also been found to prevent oxidative stress in animals exposed to ethanol, as measured by the production of reactive oxygen species [51].

6. Biological mediators of ALD

Chronic excessive alcohol consumption leads to hepatocellular injury and liver inflammation via pro- and antiinflammatory cytokine interactions [52], oxidative stress, and impairment of intracellular GSH homeostasis [53]. GSH deficiency is a pathophysiological characteristic of ALD [54] and improving GSH deficiency has been hypothesized as a promising therapeutic strategy to recover from oxidative stress-induced liver damage in patients with ALD [54]. Neuroinflammation is particularly exacerbated in alcoholic patients with liver disease and marked abnormalities such as microglial dystrophy and neuronal loss have been reported [52,53,55].

Preclinical studies have demonstrated NAC to be protective against liver injury [56] and to interact synergistically with abstinence from ethanol to improve serum lipids and hepatic antioxidant defenses [56]. One clinical study reported a trend to improve survival from alcoholic hepatitis following a short NAC regimen (i.v. 5 days; N = 174) plus glucocorticoids versus glucocorticoids only [57]. In addition, one clinical study observed significantly decreased serum alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) with a 12 week NAC regimen (1200 mg/day; N = 30) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease whereby no side effects were reported [58]. This latter study is important because it demonstrates that NAC is safe, if not beneficial, in the presence of liver injury in the oral regimen used in clinical trials in addiction.

Accordingly, unlike other medications reviewed above which are safe when used for AUD in patients with ALD, NAC has the potential of being an effective medication for both AUD and ALD, therefore making the rationale for testing it in this specific subpopulation particularly compelling and promising.

7. Evidence for NAC in reducing alcohol consumption

Studies examining the efficacy of NAC on reducing alcohol consumption or alcohol seeking behaviors are depicted in Table 1.

Table 1.

Preclinical and clinical studies of N-acetyl cysteine on alcohol consumption and alcohol seeking behaviors.

Reference Dose and Duration Subjects Study Design Outcome Measures Results Comments

Preclinical

Lebourgeois et al. (2017) 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg NAC or Saline (control) 60 minutes before each test Male Long Evans rats trained to self-administer 20% ethanol in operant cages for several weeks NAC vs vehicle on acquisition, extinction and reacquisition Lever presses during: -Self-administration of ethanol -Ethanol-seeking behaviour during extinction -Reacquisition of ethanol self-administration NAC reduced self-administration of ethanol NAC reduced ethanol seeking (responding during extinction) NAC reduced reacquisition following protracted abstinence NAC reduces ethanol-seeking behaviors and reacquisition in rats Strongest efficacy in largest dose
Quintanilla et al. (2016) 30 and 60 mg/kg NAC or Saline (control) 14 days Female Wistar-derived rats selectively bred as alcohol consumers NAC vs vehicle on acquisition phase and maintenance phrase (chronic intake) Voluntary ethanol intake during acquisition phase maintenance phrase (chronic) and saccharin intake No difference in first intake of ethanol (acquisition) NAC markedly inhibited ethanol consumption during chronic intake NAC prevented excessive saccharin intake following chronic alcohol use Efficacy of NAC in both doses in reducing ethanol consumption Strongest efficacy in largest dose
Schneider et al (2015) 60 and 90 mg/kg NAC or Saline (control) 4 days Male Wistar rats treated with 2 g/kg ethanol, twice daily, by gavage for 30 days; control animals received an appropriate dose of glucose to balance caloric intake NAC vs vehicle during withdrawal phase (24 hours following 30 days of ethanol) Corticosterone and leptin serum levels Behaviours on elevated plus maze (anxiety) NAC prevented increases in corticosterone and leptin NAC prevented hypoactivity Both NAC doses prevented corticosterone increases Largest dose prevented increases in leptin
Clinical
Squeglia et al. (2016) 2400 mg/day NAC or placebo 8 weeks N = 77 Cannabis Dependence DSM-IV-TR 72% Male Alcohol use past 30 days Age: 15–21 NAC vs PL on cannabis cessation Secondary analysis: Alcohol use, compensatory alcohol use with cannabis use Total standard drinks, drinking days, heavy drinking days (≥4 drinks for women and ≥ 5 drinks for men) In NAC patients, lower cannabis use associated with lower alcohol use, but not in placebo patients No significant differences in compensatory alcohol use with cannabis reductions Secondary analysis (not a direct trial) Drinking outcomes not independent of cannabis use No AUD diagnosis
Squeglia et al (2018) 2400 mg/day NAC or placebo 12 weeks N = 277 Cannabis Dependence DSM-IV-TR 77% Male Alcohol use past 30 days Age: 18–50 DBRCT NAC vs PL Cannabis cessation Secondary analysis: Alcohol use Total standard drinks Drinking days Heavy drinking days (≥4 drinks for women and ≥ 5 drinks for men) NAC increased weekly abstinence NAC decreased drinks per week (33% less) NAC decreased drinking days per week (31% less) Secondary analysis (not a direct trial) but controlled for baseline drinking Drinking outcomes independent of cannabis use No AUD diagnosis
Bernardo et al. (2009) 2000 mg/day NAC or placebo 24 weeks N = 75 Bipolar 40% Male Age: 18–65 79% any alcohol use NAC vs PL Substance Use (CGI-SU) Dichotomised (1–4 = improvement or no change; 5–7 became worse) No significant differences in substance/alcohol use scores at any week (p's > 0.11) Secondary analysis (not a direct trial) No comprehensive alcohol use measures No AUD diagnosis Small sample (~18 NAC-treated patients with any use analysed)
Back et al. (2016) 2400 mg/day NAC or placebo 8 weeks N = 35 DSM-IV Substance Use Disorder and PTSD 100% Male Age: 18–65 82% Alcohol use disorder NAC vs PL Substance Use (TLFB), depression (BDI), and PTSD symptoms (CAPS) No significant differences in substance/alcohol use (p = 0.07) NAC reduced craving NAC reduced depression NAC reduced PTSD symptoms Baseline levels of use were low Patients were abstinent for > 7 days at the time of study enrolment Small sample (10 NAC-treated patients with AUD) Poly drug use

Notes: Abbreviations: DBRCT = double blind randomised controlled trial, n.s. = not significant, DSM-IV-TR = Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, AUD = Alcohol Use Disorder, CBT = cognitive behavioural therapy, BDI = Beck Depression Inventory, TLFB = Time Line Follow Back, CGI-SU = Clinical Global Impression-Substance Use, PTSD = Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, CAPS = Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, NAC = N-Acetylcysteine, PL = placebo.

7.1. Preclinical studies

Recent rat studies have robustly shown that NAC reduces ethanol intake and ethanol-seeking behaviors. While not attenuating initial intake of ethanol, different doses of NAC have been demonstrated to markedly inhibit ethanol consumption by up to 70% compared to saline during a chronic intake paradigm [59,60]. These effects were sustained and observed with both low and high doses (30 and 60 mg/kg). Most recently, Lebourgeois and colleagues demonstrated that NAC reduced self-administration of ethanol, ethanol seeking during extinction and also reduced reacquisition following extinction [60]. The strongest efficacy was observed in the highest dose group (100 mg/kg) with an 81% decrease in alcohol consumption in the NAC administered group compared to the saline group. Finally, NAC has also been shown to reduce the neuroendocrine (elevations in corticosterone and leptin) and behavioral symptoms (anxiety-like behaviors) induced following ethanol cessation (withdrawal) [61].

There are several mechanisms by which NAC could improve outcomes for AUD including glutamatergic transmission (GLT-1 or cysteine-glutamate exchange), inflammatory pathways, oxidative stress, and GSH metabolism. In terms of reducing alcohol consumption and relapse, the modulation of GLT-1 and consequent stabilization to a hyperactive glutamate system is likely to be crucial. Finally, preclinical studies have robustly demonstrated that NAC administration reduces cue-induced cocaine reinstatement whereby restoring GLT-1, not cystine-glutamate exchange, is a key mechanism [62]. However, the mechanism of action of NAC remains to be entirely explained.

7.2. Clinical studies

There have been no clinical trials to date directly investigating the potential role of NAC on AUD. There has been one recent secondary analysis of drinking outcomes in a trial of oral NAC (2400 mg/day for 12 weeks; N = 277) to reduce cannabis use in participants with cannabis use disorder [63]. These authors reported a significant increase in abstinence from alcohol, reduced weekly drinking, and fewer drinking days between visits in the NAC-treated participants compared to those treated with placebo [63]. Alcohol outcomes were independent of change in cannabis use and adverse events were infrequent with no differences between NAC and placebo groups. Reductions in drinking were also previously reported in a secondary analysis of a positive trial of NAC (2400 mg/day; N = 116) for cannabis use in adolescents by this same group [64]. These reductions in alcohol consumption were associated with changes in cannabis use.

A pilot trial of NAC in the treatment of comorbid substance use (with 82% AUD) in patients with a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) suggested that NAC (2400 mg/day for 8 weeks; N = 35) might be a promising treatment for AUD given significant reduction in cravings [65]. Significant reductions in alcohol use were not reported although these patients were abstinent for at least 7 days before enrolment and indeed, no changes in substance use in general was observed, most likely due to low baseline levels across the treatment groups. Significant reductions occurred however in PTSD symptoms, craving and depression in NAC-treated patients versus placebo. This was a small trial whereby the sample size for the NAC group reporting AUD was only 10 patients. Nonetheless, the significant reductions in craving and depression are promising. Finally, although one secondary analysis of a trial of NAC for bipolar disorder (2000 mg/day for 24 weeks; N = 75; 79% reported alcohol use of any frequency) observed minimal change in alcohol use, alcohol consumption was not adequately measured whereby no detail regarding frequency, quantity or level of severity was obtained [66]. Clinical trials designed to directly investigate the effect of NAC treatment on heavy alcohol consumption in the AUD population are required.

8. Evidence for NAC in treating other addictions

Clinical studies investigating a role for NAC in the treatment of addiction in general have been well documented [67]. Briefly, beneficial effects of NAC (2400 mg/day for 5 days) on measures of cocaine use have recently been demonstrated in cocaine users including abstinence from cocaine (% positive urine) and reduced dependence severity [68]. A small placebo-controlled study also observed an effect of NAC on cocaine use cessation [69]. Regarding methamphetamine use disorder, Mousavi et al. [70] found NAC (1200 mg/day, 8 weeks) to be safe and to significantly reduce craving for methamphetamine in a crossover trial. There have been two large trials of NAC for the treatment of cannabis cessation. The first trial in adolescents demonstrated strong signals of efficacy in reducing cannabis use [64], but this was not replicated in an adult sample with cannabis use disorder [71]. A promising signal of efficacy of NAC on reducing daily smoking and levels of depression in tobacco use disorder has been demonstrated [72] in addition to a reduction of the rewarding effect of a cigarette following a period of abstinence [73]. This was not replicated more recently by a recent 14-day pilot study in active smokers [74] which may be due to continued smoking throughout the trial and concurrent pharmacotherapy. NAC has also been shown to be effective in disorders associated with impulse control including problem gambling [75] and in patients with skin-picking and hair-pulling [76,77].

9. Evidence for NAC in common comorbidities of AUD and ALD

Recent studies have demonstrated that individuals with AUD display a blunted proinflammatory response to an immune challenge relative to healthy controls [49]. This suggests that heavy alcohol use is associated with a potentially impaired immune functionality and increased vulnerability to comorbid health conditions.

9.1. Psychiatric disorders

There is a high rate of psychiatric comorbidity including depression and suicide risk in people with chronic liver disease [78] and especially in patients with ALD as opposed to patients with non-ALD [79]. Individuals with an AUD and psychiatric comorbidity are significantly more disabled, use considerably more health services than those with an AUD alone. Moreover, in AUD patients with comorbid depression or anxiety treatment drop-out is more frequent, time to relapse shorter, and long-term alcohol consumption higher [80]. Depression is also a predictor of return to drinking following a liver transplant for ALD [81].

Increasing evidence suggests that depression and suicidal behavior is associated with glutamatergic dysregulation, oxidative stress [82], and chronic inflammation [83,84]. These pathways are also thought to be critically involved in the comorbidity between AUD and depression [42,85]. Taken together, it possible that hepatocellular injury, as observed in ALD, then provides further pressure at the neuroimmune interface to sustain this cycle and further entrench these multimorbidities.

There have been several studies investigating oral NAC in the treatment of psychiatric disorders and NAC appears to have a good safety profile in this clinical population with a low frequency of adverse events reported across studies [27]. Signals of efficacy have been reported in patients with more severe major depressive disorder [86], obsessive compulsive disorder [87], and also for reducing depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder [88]. Moreover, NAC treatment has been observed to lead to significant reductions in suicidal ideation in patients with bipolar disorder [89] and reductions in nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior and depression in adolescents and young adults [90]. This suggests that NAC is suitable for patients with AUD and ALD, given it appears safe for patients with suicide risk and potentially beneficial for psychiatric comorbidity.

9.2. Cognitive impairment

Chronic heavy alcohol use is well documented to be associated with cognitive impairment including reduced executive functioning, episodic memory, and visuospatial capacities [91]. Moreover, impaired liver function, resulting from chronic and excessive alcohol use or otherwise, can produce subtle but measurable cognitive deficits [92]. The evidence for NAC in improving cognition across a range of different patient groups is still equivocal given the paucity of the literature, but some positive effects on cognition have been reported [93], including improved measures of processing speed in schizophrenia [94]. There have been several experimental studies demonstrating NAC to be effective in improving cognition in patients with cocaine use disorder including improved inhibition using the stop signal task [68] and attentional bias [95].

9.3. Other common physical comorbidities

Chronic excessive alcohol consumption is associated with alcoholic heart disease and high rates of diabetes and obesity. Administration of NAC in rat models prevents ethanol-induced calorimetric changes and to reduced myocardial oxidative stress [56]. In addition, NAC supplementation in mice has shown to inhibit the increase of fat mass and the development of obesity during a high fat diet and suppressed hepatic lipid accumulation [96]. Chronic excessive alcohol use can also impair multiple critical cellular functions in the lung leading to alcoholic lung disease. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that NAC prevents alcohol-induced lung complications such as alcohol-induced ciliary dysfunction (AICD) [97]. In addition, alcohol consumption has been shown to produce detrimental effects on bone metabolism and alcohol binging alters the quality of fracture healing after a traumatic injury. Concurrent administration of NAC has been demonstrated to reverse these effects [98].

10. Conclusion

In conclusion, NAC has demonstrated some signals of efficacy in a range of conditions aligned with AUD and is safe, and possibly beneficial, for ALD and common psychiatric comorbidities including mood disorders. Clinical studies in specific populations are required in order to avoid overestimating or underestimating the evidence of NAC.

11. Expert opinion

The preclinical literature shows that NAC prevents alcohol seeking behaviors and clinical studies suggest that NAC may reduce alcohol consumption. However, it is relevant to also note that there have been mixed results for the efficacy of NAC in most substance use disorders, which are probably due to inconsistencies in treatment goal, small sample sizes, abstinence at enrolment and concurrent substance use [67]. Most positive signals of efficacy for NAC on substance use from the clinical literature have occurred in the context of promoting continued abstinence, rather than the promotion of initial cessation, and this mirrors the robust findings found in the reinstatement model from the preclinical literature [67]. NAC may be particularly beneficial in the context of managing patients with ALD given that the treatment goal is generally to maintain abstinence and prevent relapse in order to prevent the progression of liver injury rather than reduce consumption. Nonetheless, with regards to the preclinical literature for alcohol consumption, studies have found efficacy for NAC during several phases of alcohol consumption including withdrawal, chronic alcohol intake, and reinstatement following extinction, with less evidence for reducing initial intake (acquisition). Moreover, the secondary analyses of drinking outcomes from a cannabis trial found NAC to significantly reduce both abstinence and heavy drinking days. Thus, at this point the phase of treatment that yields the most effective outcomes for alcohol consumption is unknown. Clinical trials directly examining NAC in treatment seeking alcohol patients will have to further elucidate these factors.

It is important to note that, with regards to the efficacy of NAC in the antioxidant setting, results from the general literature reinforce the concept that NAC should not be considered to be a powerful antioxidant per se, but rather that NAC replenishes GSH in deficient cells and thus it is likely to be ineffective in cells replete in GSH [99]. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study observing that the beneficial response of NAC to reduce positive symptoms in schizophrenia was predicted by baseline blood GSH peroxidase activity [94]. Although it is unknown as to whether the antioxidant properties of NAC are a key mechanism for reducing alcohol consumption and/or symptoms of associated comorbidities, the GSH deficiency observed with hepatic injury and chronic drinking suggests that ALD patients are most likely to receive maximal benefits of NAC treatment.

The converging evidence suggests some therapeutic potential of NAC in the treatment of AUDs. There is a need for well-powered, direct examinations of the efficacy of NAC in treatment seeking AUD patients, particularly in the context of patients with GSH deficiency and those aiming to sustain abstinence such as patients with ALD. NAC is inexpensive and is a currently registered medication in many countries worldwide such that positive results could lead to timely integration into service delivery for a clinical group that currently has very few treatment options.

Article highlights.

  • Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the leading cause of alcohol-related death and one of the most common forms of liver disease.

  • Abstinence from alcohol is crucial to reducing morbidity and mortality associated with the disease yet there are few treatment options for those with significant liver disease.

  • N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant with glutamatergic modulating and anti-inflammatory properties that is low cost and well-tolerated.

  • Animal studies demonstrate efficacy of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) for preventing relapse to alcohol consumption and improving liver function.

  • Preliminary evidence in humans is emerging to show significant benefits of NAC to increase abstinence from alcohol.

    Clinical trials directly examining efficacy in this clinical population are required.

Funding

KC Morley is supported by a NSW Health Translational Research Fellowship. Kate Chitty is supported by an NHMRC Research Fellowship.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (•) or of considerable interest (••) to readers.

  • 1.WHO. Global information system on alcohol and health. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stoklosa TM, Morley KC, Volovets A, et al. Pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder in the context of liver disease. Current addiction reports.2018. doi: 10.1007/s40429-018-0211-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rehm J, Samokhvalov AV, Shield KD. Global burden of alcoholic liver diseases. Journal of Hepatology. 2013;59(1):160–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liang W, Chikritzhs T, Pascal R, et al. Mortality rate of alcoholic liver disease and risk of hospitalization for alcoholic liver cirrhosis, alcoholic hepatitis and alcoholic liver failure in Australia between 1993 and 2005. Intern Med J. 2011;41(1a):34–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Addolorato G, Mirijello A, Leggio L, et al. Management of alcohol dependence in patients with liver disease. CNS Drugs. 2013;27(4):287–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leggio L, Lee MR. Treatment of alcohol use disorder in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Am J Med. 2017;130(2):124–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khan A, Tansel A, White DL, et al. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions in inducing and maintaining alcohol abstinence in patients with chronic liver disease: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(2):191–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jonas DE, Amick HR, Feltner C, et al. Pharmacotherapy for adults with alcohol use disorders in outpatient settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2014;311(18):1889–1900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haber P, Warner R, Seth D, et al. Pathogenesis and management of alcoholic hepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:1332–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McDonough M, Crowley P. Naltrexone and liver disease. Aust Prescr. 2015;38:151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Latour P, Biraben A, Polard E, et al. Drug induced encephalopathy in six epileptic patients: topiramate? valproate? or both?. Hum. 2004;19(3):193–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mason BJ, Ritvo EC, Morgan RO, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral nalmefene HCl for alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1994;18(5):1162–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pierce M, Sutterland A, Beraha E, et al. Efficacy, tolerability and safety of low dose and high dose baclofen in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 28(7):795–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morley KC, Baillie A, Fraser I, et al. Baclofen in the treatment of alcohol dependence with or without liver disease (BacALD): a multi-site, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;212(6):362–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Addolorato G, Leggio L, Ferrulli A, et al. Effectiveness and safety of baclofen for maintenance of alcohol abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients with liver cirrhosis: randomised, double-blind controlled study. Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1915–1922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Beraha EM, Salemink E, Goudriaan AE, et al. Efficacy and safety of high-dose baclofen for the treatment of alcohol dependence: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;26(12):1950–1959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jamshidi N, Morley KC, Cairns R, et al. The impact of off-label baclofen prescribing: misuse, overdose and calls to the poisons information centre. Alcohol and Alcoholism. Under review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rolland B, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, et al. Baclofen for alcohol dependence: relationships between baclofen and alcohol dosing and the occurrence of major sedation. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25(10):1631–1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dore GM, Lo K, Juckes L, et al. Clinical experience with baclofen in the management of alcohol-dependent patients with psychiatric comorbidity: a selected case series. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2011;46(6):714–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pelissier F, de Haro L, Cardona F, et al. Self-poisoning with baclofen in alcohol-dependent patients: national reports to French Poison Control Centers, 2008–2013. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2017;55(4):275–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Whyte IM, Francis B, Dawson AH. Safety and efficacy of intravenous N-acetylcysteine for acetaminophen overdose: analysis of the Hunter Area Toxicology Service (HATS) database. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(10):2359–2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sanguinetti CM. N-acetylcysteine in COPD: why, how, and when? Multidiscip Respir Med. 2016;11:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Millea PJ. N-acetylcysteine: multiple clinical applications. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80(3):265–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lewerenz J, Hewett SJ, Huang Y, et al. The cystine/glutamate antiporter system x(c)(−) in health and disease: from molecular mechanisms to novel therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;18(5):522–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schmitt B, Vicenzi M, Garrel C, et al. ffects of N-acetylcysteine, oral glutathione (GSH) and a novel sublingual form of GSH on oxidative stress markers: a comparative crossover study. Redox Biol. 2015;6:198–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. de Andrade K, Moura FA, dos Santos JM, et al. Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Hepatic Diseases: Therapeutic Possibilities of N-Acetylcysteine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015;16:30269–30308. • Hepatic Diseases: Therapeutic Possibilities.
  • 27.Zheng W, Zhang QE, Cai DB, et al. N-acetylcysteine for major mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018;137(5):391–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Duailibi MS, Cordeiro Q, Brietzke E, et al. N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of craving in substance use disorders:systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Addict. 2017;26(7):660–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hwa L, Besheer J, Kash T. Glutamate plasticity woven through the progression to alcohol use disorder: a multi-circuit perspective. F1000Res. 2017;6:298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barker JM, Lench DH, Chandler LJ. Reversal of alcohol dependence-induced deficits in cue-guided behavior via mGluR2/3 signaling in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016;233(2):235–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Adams CL, Short JL, Lawrence AJ. Cue-conditioned alcohol seeking in rats following abstinence: involvement of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;159(3):534–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sari Y, Sakai M, Weedman JM, et al. Ceftriaxone, a beta-lactam antibiotic, reduces ethanol consumption in alcohol-preferring rats. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2011;46(3):239–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spencer S, Kalivas PW. Glutamate transport: a new bench to bedside mechanism for treating drug abuse. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;20(10):797–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bauer J, Pedersen A, Scherbaum N, et al. Craving in alcohol-dependent patients after detoxification is related to glutamatergic dysfunction in the nucleus accumbens and the anterior cingulate cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(8):1401–1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Prisciandaro JJ, Schacht JP, Prescot AP, et al. Associations between recent heavy drinking and dorsal anterior cingulate n-acetylaspartate and glutamate concentrations in non-treatment-seeking individuals with alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(3):491–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cheng H, Kellar D, Lake A, et al. Effects of alcohol cues on MRS glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Umhau JC, Momenan R, Schwandt ML, et al. Effect of acamprosate on magnetic resonance spectroscopy measures of central glutamate in detoxified alcohol-dependent individuals: a randomized controlled experimental medicine study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(10):1069–1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baker DA, McFarland K, Lake RW, et al. Neuroadaptations in cysteine-glutamate exchange underlie cocaine relapse. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(7):743–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Knackstedt LA, Melendez RI, Kalivas PW. Ceftriaxone restores glutamate homeostasis and prevents relapse to cocaine seeking. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67(1):81–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schmaal L, Veltman DJ, Nederveen A, et al. N-acetylcysteine normalizes glutamate levels in cocaine-dependent patients: a randomized crossover magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(9):2143–2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.de Timary P, Stärkel P, Delzenne NM, et al. A role for the peripheral immune system in the development of alcohol use disorders? Neuropharmacology. 2017;122:148–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Neupane SP. Neuroimmune interface in the comorbidity between alcohol use disorder and major depression. Front Immunol. 2016;7:655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Crews FT, Sarkar DK, Qin L, et al. Neuroimmune function and the consequences of alcohol exposure. Alcohol Res. 2015;37(2):331–41, 44–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Leclercq S, de Timary P, Delzenne NM, et al. The link between inflammation, bugs, the intestine and the brain in alcohol dependence. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(2):e1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fox HC, Milivojevic V, Angarita GA, et al. Peripheral immune system suppression in early abstinent alcohol-dependent individuals: links to stress and cue-related craving. J Psychopharmacol. 2017;31(7):883–892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Milivojevic V, Ansell E, Simpson C, et al. Peripheral immune system adaptations and motivation for alcohol in non-dependent problem drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017;41(3):585–595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hanak C, Benoit J, Fabry L, et al. Changes in pro-inflammatory markers in detoxifying chronic alcohol abusers, divided by lesch typology, reflect cognitive dysfunction. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2017;52(5):529–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kalk NJ, Guo Q, Owen D, et al. Decreased hippocampal translocator protein (18 kDa) expression in alcohol dependence: a [(11)C]PBR28 PET study. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(1):e996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hillmer AT, Sandiego CM, Hannestad J, et al. In vivo imaging of translocator protein, a marker of activated microglia, in alcohol dependence. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22(12):1759–1766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Schneider R Jr., Bandiera S, Souza DG, et al. N-acetylcysteine prevents alcohol related neuroinflammation in rats. Neurochem Res. 2017;42(8):2135–2141. • Article of interest: Preclinical oabservation that NACadministration reduces alcohol-induced neuroinflammation.
  • 51.Mocelin R, Marcon M, D’Ambros S, et al. Biochemical effects of N-acetylcysteine in zebrafish acutely exposed to ethanol. Neurochem Res. 2018;43(2):458–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kawaratani H, Tsujimoto T, Douhara A, et al. The effect of inflammatory cytokines in alcoholic liver disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:495156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Morry J, Ngamcherdtrakul W, Yantasee W. Oxidative stress in cancer and fibrosis: opportunity for therapeutic intervention with antioxidant compounds, enzymes, and nanoparticles. Redox Biol. 2017;11:240–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sacco R, Eggenhoffner R, Giacomelli L. Glutathione in the treatment of liver diseases: insights from clinical practice. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2016;62(4):316–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sutherland GT, Sheedy D, Kril JJ. Neuropathology of alcoholism. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;125:603–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Seiva FR, Amauchi JF, Rocha KK, et al. Alcoholism and alcohol abstinence: N-acetylcysteine to improve energy expenditure, myocardial oxidative stress, and energy metabolism in alcoholic heart disease. Alcohol. 2009;43(8):649–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.AAH-NAC Study Group, Nguyen-Khac E, Thevenot T, Piquet MA, et al. Glucocorticoids plus N-acetylcysteine in severe alcoholic hepatitis. N Engl J Med 2011;365(19):1781–1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Khoshbaten M, Aliasgarzadeh A, Masnadi K, et al. N-acetylcysteine improves liver function in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepat Mon. 2010;10(1):12–16. •• Article of high interest: Clinical demonstration of improvement in markers of liver function, alanine transaminase, following NAC treatment.
  • 59. Lebourgeois S, Gonzalez-Marin MC, Jeanblanc J, et al. Effect of N-acetylcysteine on motivation, seeking and relapse to ethanol self-administration. Addict Biol. 2018;23(2):643–652. • Article of interest: Preclinical demonstration of reduction in alcohol seeking and relapse following NAC treatment.
  • 60.Quintanilla ME, Rivera-Meza M, Berrios-Carcamo P, et al. The “first hit”: marked inhibition by N-Acetyl Cysteine of chronic ethanol intake but not of early ethanol intakeparallel effects on ethanol-induced saccharin motivation. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(5):1044–1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schneider R Jr., Santos CF, Clarimundo V, et al. N-acetylcysteine prevents behavioral and biochemical changes induced by alcohol cessation in rats. Alcohol. 2015;49(3):259–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Reissner KJ, Gipson CD, Tran PK, et al. Glutamate transporter GLT-1 mediates N-acetylcysteine inhibition of cocaine reinstatement. Addict Biol. 2015;20(2):316–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Squeglia LM, Tomko RL, Baker NL, et al. The effect of N-acetylcysteine on alcohol use during a cannabis cessation trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;185:17–22. •• Article of high interest: Clinical demonstration of abstinence from alcohol following NAC treatment.
  • 64.Gray KM, Carpenter MJ, Baker NL, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine in cannabis-dependent adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(8):805–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Back SE, McCauley JL, Korte KJ, et al. A double-blind, randomized, controlled pilot trial of N-Acetylcysteine in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(11):e1439–e46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bernardo M, Dodd S Gama C, et al. Effects of n-acetylcysteine on substance use in bipolar disorder: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2009;21(5):239–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McClure EA, Gipson CD, Malcolm RJ, et al. Potential role of N-acetylcysteine in the management of substance use disorders. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(2):95–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schulte MHJ, Wiers RW, Boendermaker WJ, et al. The effect of N-acetylcysteine and working memory training on cocaine use, craving and inhibition in regular cocaine users: correspondence of lab assessments and ecological momentary assessment. Addict Behav. 2017;79:24–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.LaRowe SD, Myrick H, Hedden S, et al. Is cocaine desire reduced by N-acetylcysteine? Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(7):1115–1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mousavi SG, Sharbafchi MR, Salehi M, et al. The efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence: a double-blind controlled, crossover study. Arch Iran Med. 2015;18(1):28–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gray KM, Sonne SC, McClure EA, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine for cannabis use disorder in adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;177:249–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Prado E, Maes M, Piccoli LG, et al. N-acetylcysteine for therapy-resistant tobacco use disorder: a pilot study. Redox Rep. 2015;20(5):215–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schmaal L, Berk L, Hulstijn KP, et al. Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of nicotine dependence: a double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. Eur Addict Res. 2011;17(4):211–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Schulte M, Goudriaan AE, Kaag AM, et al. The effect of N-acetylcysteine on brain glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid concentrations and on smoking cessation: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol. 2017;31(10):1377–1379. • Article of interest: Clinical demonstration of reductions in brain glutamate following NAC treatment.
  • 75.Grant JE, Odlaug BL, Chamberlain SR, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization for nicotine-dependent pathological gamblers. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(1):39–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Grant JE, Odlaug BL, Kim SW. N-acetylcysteine, a glutamate modulator, in the treatment of trichotillomania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(7):756–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Grant JE, Chamberlain SR, Redden SA, et al. N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of excoriation disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(5):490–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Huang X, Liu X, Yu Y. Depression and chronic liver diseases: are there shared underlying mechanisms? Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ewusi-Mensah I, Saunders JB, Wodak AD, et al. Psychiatric morbidity in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983;287(6403):1417–1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Teesson M, Slade T, Mills K. Comorbidity in Australia: findings of the 2007 national survey of mental health and wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43(7):606–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kelly M, Chick J, Gribble R, et al. Predictors of relapse to harmful alcohol after orthotopic liver transplantation. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2006;41(3):278–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hirose A, Terauchi M, Akiyoshi M, et al. Depressive symptoms are associated with oxidative stress in middle-aged women: a cross-sectional study. Biopsychosoc Med. 2016;10:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lopresti AL. Cognitive behaviour therapy and inflammation: A systematic review of its relationship and the potential implications for the treatment of depression. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;51(6):565–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Brundin L, Sellgren CM, Lim CK, et al. An enzyme in the kynurenine pathway that governs vulnerability to suicidal behavior by regulating excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6(8):e865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hermens DF, Chitty KM, Lee RS, et al. Hippocampal glutamate is increased and associated with risky drinking in young adults with major depression. J Affect Disord. 2015;186:95–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Berk M, Dean OM, Cotton SM, et al. The efficacy of adjunctive N-acetylcysteine in major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014; 75(6):628–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Paydary K, Akamaloo A, Ahmadipour A, et al. N-acetylcysteine augmentation therapy for moderate-to-severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41(2):214–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Berk M, Copolov DL, Dean O, et al. N-acetyl cysteine for depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder–a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64:468–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Waterdrinker A, Berk M, Venugopal K, et al. Effects of N-Acetyl cysteine on suicidal ideation in bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(5):665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Cullen KR, Klimes-Dougan B, Westlund Schreiner M, et al. N-acetylcysteine for nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior in adolescents: an open-label pilot study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018;28(2):136–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bernardin F, Maheut-Bosser A, Paille F. Cognitive impairments in alcohol-dependent subjects. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tarter RE, Alterman AI. Neuropsychological deficits in alcoholics: etiological considerations. J Stud Alcohol. 1984;45(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Skvarc DR, Dean OM, Byrne LK, et al. The effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on human cognition - A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;78:44–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Conus P, Seidman LJ, Fournier M, et al. e. N-acetylcysteine in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial: toward biomarker-guided treatment in early psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2018;44(2):317–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Levi Bolin B, Alcorn JL 3rd, Lile JA, et al. N-Acetylcysteine reduces cocaine-cue attentional bias and differentially alters cocaine self-administration based on dosing order. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;178:452–460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ma Y, Gao M, N-Acetylcysteine Protects LD. Mice from high fat diet-induced metabolic disorders. Pharm Res. 2016;33(8):2033–2042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Simet SM, Pavlik JA, Sisson JH. Dietary antioxidants prevent alcohol-induced ciliary dysfunction. Alcohol. 2013;47(8):629–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Volkmer DL, Sears B, Lauing KL, et al. Antioxidant therapy attenuates deficient bone fracture repair associated with binge alcohol exposure. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(8):516–521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Rushworth GF, Megson IL. Existing and potential therapeutic uses for N-acetylcysteine: the need for conversion to intracellular glutathione for antioxidant benefits. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;141(2):150–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES