Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Sep 2;129(36):9058–9067. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02586

Critical Role of Mg2+ Ions in RNA Folding Transitions: Anchoring the A‑Minor Twist in the SAM-II Riboswitch

Rafael G Viegas †,, Anushree Sinha §, Avijit Mainan §, Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu ∥,, José N Onuchic #,∇,, Susmita Roy §,*, Vitor BP Leite ◆,*
PMCID: PMC12434664  PMID: 40892043

Abstract

Magnesium ions (Mg2+) play a crucial role in stabilizing various RNA tertiary motifs, such as pseudoknots, G-quadruplexes, kissing loops, and A-minor motifs, to name a few. Despite their importance, the precise location and role of Mg2+ ions in RNA folding are challenging to characterize both experimentally and computationally. In this study, we employ an all-atom structure-based model integrated with the dynamic counterion condensation (DCC) model to investigate the folding and unfolding transitions of apo SAM-II riboswitch RNA at physiological concentrations of Mg2+. Using the Energy Landscape Visualization Method (ELViM), we trace the transitions between conformational phases, focusing on magnesium interactions. ELViM reveals key structural ensembles during the transition from the unfolded to the folded state, facilitated by a partially folded intermediate, which is conformationally similar to that found in early 13C-CEST NMR. Interestingly, this study finds the rate-limiting transition from the unfolded state to this intermediate initiated by the formation of an A-minor twist interaction, a stable scaffold in the aptamer domain, stabilized by specific Mg2+ coordination. The contact probability map shows that this specific Mg2+ bridges a helical region and an internal loop, mitigating electrostatic repulsion at the phosphate level. As a result, a set of hydrogen-bond-mediated interactions between the loop and the minor groove of the helix is stabilized, supporting the formation of the A-minor twist. This study underscores the critical role of Mg2+ in driving the rate-limiting event of RNA folding and highlights its strategic location in stabilizing the A-minor twist motif, essential for the global packing and regulatory function of the SAM-II riboswitch aptamer.


graphic file with name jp5c02586_0008.jpg


graphic file with name jp5c02586_0006.jpg

Introduction

RNA, with its remarkable structural versatility, adopts intricate tertiary folds that are essential for mediating critical molecular interactions within the cell. However, the folding process is inherently challenged by strong electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged phosphate groups along the RNA backbone. , This electrostatic repulsion is largely mitigated by counterions, which help neutralize the backbone charges and facilitate folding, although their efficiency and mechanism of action can vary significantly depending on ion type and local structural context.

A striking example is that millimolar concentrations of Mg2+ can stabilize RNA tertiary motifs, such as pseudoknots and kissing loops, which remain weakly stable even under high concentrations of monovalent cations like K+, Na+. Unlike monovalent cations, which offer only modest stabilization, Mg2+ provides a strong electrostatic interaction and can form more robust bridges between phosphate groups. With a high charge density and a small ionic radius, Mg2+ effectively neutralizes backbone repulsion and closely interacts with RNA without causing significant structural distortion. This stabilization is crucial for maintaining complex folding patterns and binding sites essential for RNA function. Despite the significance of Mg2+ ions being acknowledged, pinpointing their exact positions and roles in RNA folding presents a formidable challenge.

Like other RNAs, riboswitches also depend on Mg2+ for tertiary structure stability. Riboswitches, a unique category of noncoding RNAs, can bind cellular metabolites and regulate gene expression, adopting various complex secondary and tertiary structural folds. A classic example of translational riboswitch is the SAM-II riboswitch (52 nt), which, upon binding SAM (S-Adenosyl methionine), sequesters its Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence to repress translation (translation-OFF state); in the absence of ligand, it allows translation (translation-ON). Previously, using various chemical and biophysical methods including NMR and FRET, Haller et al. highlighted the dynamic nature of the unliganded SAM-II riboswitch, in that its stem-loop element becomes engaged in a pseudoknot fold through base-pairing with nucleosides in the 3′ overhang containing the Shine–Dalgarno sequence. Later, our computer simulations validated by 13C CEST NMR, smFRET, Small angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS), and size exclusion chromatographic (SEC) data, showed that apo SAM-II exists in a dynamic equilibrium between partially open and partially closed states, with partial SD sequestration being ligand-dependent. While these studies clarified the ligand’s role in shifting conformational equilibria, the broader question of how the RNA ion atmosphere governs SAM-II RNA folding even to partially closed state remains open.

In a recent review, we highlighted Mg2+’s role as outer-sphere ions influencing RNA folding. Mg2+ typically remains hexahydrated in solution but can interact closely with RNA either through direct coordination or via solvent-separated interactions, commonly referred to as outer-sphere coordination. Draper and others have shown that such outer-sphere Mg2+ are essential for tertiary fold stabilization. In fact our Dynamic Counterion Condensation (DCC) model further demonstrated the importance of these interactions in RNA pseudoknots from BWYV, SARS-CoV-2, and flaviviral RNAs.

In the current study, we focus on exploring entire folding/unfolding transitions of apo SAM-II RNAa process vital for maintaining the translation-ON state, using our DCC model integrated structure-based RNA simulation method. ,− Simulations began from the crystal structure of SAM-II riboswitch RNA, which forms an H-type pseudoknot , with helices P1, P2a, P2b, and loops L1 and L3 (Figure A). Tertiary contacts include L1–P2b interactions forming a triple helix at the SAM-binding site (Figure B), and A-minor contacts between L3 and P1, critical for structural integrity. , In SAM-II, adenines in L3 (A33, A35–37) twist around P1’s minor groove, creating an A-minor twist motif with key contributions from A33 and A37. To capture ion-driven RNA folding dynamics under physiological Mg2+ concentration, DCC model incorporates explicit Mg2+ ions. Mimicking experimental salt condition, 100 mM KCl salt buffer is maintained, but KCl is treated implicitly using Generalized Manning counterion condensation (GMCC) theory. We visualized the conformational landscape using the Energy Landscape Visualization Method (ELViM), , which identifies key folding basins and transition states. Previously applied to proteins and RNA tetraloops, ELViM revealed distinct U (unfolded), PF (partially folded), and F (folded) states for SAM-II.

1.

1

SAM-II riboswitch: structure, free energy profile, and transition dynamics. (A) Secondary structure of SAM-II. The L3 loop interacts with the minor groove of the helix P1 to form the A-minor twist motif. Base-pairings are indicated using the Leontis–Westhof notation, and dashed lines indicate additional H-bonds. (B) Tertiary structure of the SAM-II riboswitch (PDB: 2QWY, chain A). (C) Coarse-graining scheme used to calculate the dissimilarity, with beads at the center of mass of the phosphate, sugar, and base groups. (D) Free energy profile for SAM-II riboswitch at 101 T R, [Mg2+] = 2.0 mM, identifying unfolded (U), partially open (PO), partially folded (PF), and folded (F) states. (E) Dynamic transition between U and PO states, shown by the evolution of the fraction of native contacts at 91 T R. (F) Dynamic transition between PO and PF states, shown by the evolution of the fraction of native contacts at 84 T R.

The study finds that the critical transition from the unfolded (U) to partially folded (PF) state is mediated by the formation of the A-minor twist motifa rate-limiting step involving P1–P1 and P1–L3 interactions. Mechanistically, it demonstrates how Mg2+ ions localize near these structural motifs and stabilize a long-range G28–U38 contact at the motif’s edge. This Mg2+-mediated ‘sweet-spot’ interaction reinforces A-minor formation, thereby ensuring the correct folding of the SAM-II riboswitch aptamer essential for its gene-regulatory function.

Methods

Atomistic Simulations Using Dynamic Counterion Condensation Model

To explore the structural dynamics and conformational phase space of SAM-II riboswitch RNA, a recently developed dynamic counterion condensation (DCC) model has been employed. This model combines an implicit-explicit ion environment of monovalent-divalent salts around RNA. It integrates a recently developed Generalized Manning Counterion Condensation (GMCC) theory into an all-atom Structure-Based Model (SBM) of RNA. ,, The DCC model addresses physiological conditions where RNA encounters a mixed monovalent and divalent salt environment. Explicit treatment of Mg2+ is essential for governing RNA tertiary packing, while KCl is treated implicitly for computational efficiency using GMCC theory. It is important to note that the explicit treatment of Mg2+ ions specifically refers to the solvent-separated outer-sphere Mg2+ ions. GMCC theory is an extension of Classical Manning Condensation Theory, which considers counterion condensation in polyelectrolyte systems. , Following GMCC, the DCC model incorporates the local charge density of implicit K+ ions as a smeared Gaussian shell around each negatively charged phosphate. This Gaussian shell forms the hybrid implicit-explicit interface, excluding the continuum charge density of condensed implicit K+ ions around explicit phosphate groups. In the model, K+ and Cl are treated with Gaussian smeared charge, while other ions, including phosphate and Mg2+, are treated as point charges for simplicity. The interactionspoint charge-point charge, point charge-Gaussian, and Gaussian-Gaussianare all expressed in terms of Debye–Hückel potential. The complete Hamiltonian used in the DCC model can be written as

V=VSBM+VExclVolume+VElectrostatic 1

where V SBM is the all-atom structure-based model potential. The contact level information used in V SBM was derived from the crystal structure (PDB: 2QWY) using the shadow algorithm. V Excl‑Volume is the excluded volume effect of explicitly treated hexa-hydrated Mg2+ ions, and V Electrostatic represents all electrostatic interactions involved in the RNA system. The details of the DCC model and the parameter set used in this model have been extensively discussed in recent literature. ,

Equilibrium Simulation Details

Atomic coordinates and condensation variables are evolved using Langevin dynamics with a time step of 0.001 τR. We employ underdamped conditions for rapid sampling. For explicit particles, a reduced mass of 1 μR and a drag coefficient of 1 τR were used. Condensation parameters are given a mass of 15 μR nm2 and a drag coefficient of 0.05 τR nm2. We run 28 production simulations with temperatures varying from 96.5T R to 107T R to access the whole conformation phase space of the SAM-II riboswitch. Each simulation was run for 200 million time steps. To accommodate Mg2+ composition, we created a large cubic box of length 75 nm. The number of Mg2+ ions included in the box controls the overall concentration of the corresponding solutes. The excess ions are calculated for the folded and unfolded conformational states with their corresponding representative trajectories, using the cutoff from the analysis of the radial distribution function for Mg2+ around the phosphate groups (Table S1 and Figure S1, right). Periodic boundary conditions are applied. Effective charges of −1 are used for each phosphate group and +2 for each Mg2+ ion. The parameter set we used for the present simulation is described in the early literature. ,

Estimation of the Folding Free Energy Profile

To comprehensively explore the conformational landscape of the SAM-II riboswitch, umbrella sampling method has been employed, using the fraction of native contacts (Q) as the reaction coordinate. A series of initial configurations has been generated across discrete Q windows by utilizing a slow pulling approach, ensuring Mg2+-equilibrated starting structures. For each window, the distribution of explicit Mg2+ ions has been reinitialized to improve equilibration, and simulations were extended for 100 million steps per window. To ensure sufficient overlap between adjacent windows, a total of 45 umbrella windows were used along the Q coordinate. The free energy was then reconstructed using the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method (WHAM). Further methodological details of the umbrella sampling protocol are provided in Supporting Information.

Energy Landscape Visualization Method (ELViM)

ELViM , is a versatile multidimensional projection tool used to project effective conformational phase spaces of biomolecules onto a two-dimensional plane. This process involves two key steps: (i) calculating a dissimilarity matrix containing structural distances between all pairs of conformations and (ii) employing a multidimensional projection technique to generate the low-dimensional representation.

In this study, we estimated dissimilarities using Coarse-Grained (CG) coordinates of the biomolecular system. To achieve this, we employed the Coarse Grain Builder in VMD to create three CG beads per nucleotide, positioned at the centers of mass of the phosphate group, the sugar, and the base. A representation of this model is presented in Figure C. The dissimilarity between two conformations, denoted as k and l, is based on Q w, , and defined as follows:

qwk,l=1Npi,jpairsexp[(ri,jkri,jl)22σi,j2] 2

Here, r ij and r ij represent the distances between CG beads i and j in conformations k and l, respectively. The weighting parameter σ i,j varies slightly with the sequence distance and is given by σ i,j = σ0|n bn b |ϵ, where n b and n b denote the residue index to which CG beads i and j belong. The parameter σ0 sets the similarity resolution and was set to 3 Å. N p is the total number of CG bead pairs, and ϵ = 0.15. Dissimilarity, defined as δ k,l = 1 – q w , is a unitless measure ranging from zero for identical conformations to one for highly dissimilar ones.

The multidimensional projection is performed using the force scheme algorithm. Initially, a point representing each conformation is randomly placed in the 2D plane. The algorithm iteratively selects each point as a pivot and slightly adjusts the positions of all other points to optimally approximate the pairwise Euclidean distances (d k,l ) to the dissimilarities (δ k,l ).

To compose the ELViM projection, we subsampled 16 equilibrium trajectories to obtain a converged representation of the conformational phase space. To ensure equilibration, we discarded the first 700 frames of each trajectory and kept frames as follows: one out of every three frames for temperatures sampling the F–PF basin (96.5T R , 97.0T R , 97.5T R , 98.0T R , 98.5 T R) and the U–PF basin (103.0 T R, 103.2 T R, 104.0 T R, 104.4 T R, 104.6 T R); and one out of every seven frames for temperatures sampling the partially folded basin (100.0 T R, 100.5 T R, 101.0 T R, 101.5 T R, 102.0 T R, 102.5 T R). Additionally, 954 frames were taken sequentially during the five U–PF transitions (0.35 < Q < 0.65). The resulting ELViM projection is composed of 19,005 conformations.

To illustrate representative conformations from specific regions of the effective phase space, we calculate Local Conformational Signatures (LCS), determined through the following steps: (i) manually selecting all points within a specific region (e.g., a high-density basin); (ii) computing a matrix of pairwise distance-root-mean-square deviation (dRMSD) values; (iii) identifying the centroid structure that minimizes the average dRMSD; and (iv) displaying the centroid structure alongside some of its nearest neighbors (based on dRMSD) superposed. In this manuscript, the centroid structure is selected and shown as the representative conformation.

Results

A free energy profile was computed adopting the umbrella sampling technique, revealing four distinct conformational states of the riboswitchunfolded (U), partially open (PO), partially folded (PF), and fully folded (F) (Figure D). Notably, this profile highlights two transition states: (i) transition state 1 (TS1), which delineates the energy barrier between the unfolded and partially open states, and (ii) transition state 2 (TS2), which separates the partially open and partially folded states. A set of 30 simulations was conducted, from which the evolution of the fraction of native contacts reveals the dynamic transitions of the riboswitch between the unfolded (U) and partially open (PO) states, as well as between the partially open (PO) and partially folded (PF) states. Representative trajectories illustrating these breathing motions are shown in Figures E,F respectively.

ELViM Analysis of the Effective Phase Space

In this section, the Energy Landscape Visualization Method (ELViM) is applied to obtain a low-dimensional representation of the conformational landscape of the SAM-II riboswitch, as sampled from the equilibrium trajectories. Supporting Figure S2A also shows the Q and RMSD values for each conformation in the ELViM phase space.

Figure A presents the ELViM projection colored by the reaction coordinate Q. In this effective conformational phase space, each dot represents a sampled conformation, and pairwise Euclidean distances optimally correlate with structural dissimilarity. Thus, nearby dots correspond to structurally similar conformations. The coloring by Q highlights the distribution of folded (Q > 0.85, deep red), partially folded (0.55 < Q < 0.85, light blue to yellow), partially open (0.4 < Q < 0.55, dark blue to light blue) and unfolded states (Q < 0.4, dark blue). Notably, unfolded conformations cluster in a curved, tail-like region connected to the main projection body through a narrow region that encompasses the transition-state ensemble corresponding to the U–PF transition. Figure S2B, in the Supporting Information, also presents the ELViM projection color-coded based on RMSD values.

2.

2

ELViM effective phase-space of the SAM-II riboswitch. (A) Each dot represents a sampled conformation, colored by the reaction coordinate Q. Pairwise distances optimally capture structural dissimilarity. Unfolded (U), Partially Open (PO), Partially Folded (PF), and Folded (F) basins are indicated. (B) Density of states estimated using Gaussian KDE. Representative conformations from the densest basins illustrate the conformational landscape.

To gain a deeper understanding of the effective phase space, we estimated the density of data points using a Gaussian kernel density estimate (KDE) and obtained representative conformations (or local signatures) from the densest basins using the Local Conformational Signature (LCS) procedure described in the Methods section. The local signatures are depicted in Figure B and provide insight into various regions within the effective phase space. Local signatures (i) and (ii) correspond to the unfolded basin. While conformations from the basin represented by the local signature (i) are completely unfolded, some contacts involving the internal segment of P1 and L3 are eventually observed near the basin characterized by local signature (ii).

Transitioning into the PF basin, the representative conformations (iii), (iv), (v), (vi), and (vii) represent the partially folded state, where base-pairing and stacking interactions in the A-minor twist motif (P1 helix and P1–L3) are established. The comparison of these signatures highlights how the number of base contacts, including local and tertiary pseudoknot interactions, progressively increases, leading to the formation of the P2b helix and the P2b–L1 tertiary structure. Finally, local signature (viii) represents the folded state, in which the P2a helix is partially formed. Notably, the P2a helix, which is the last motif to fold, contains the ribosome binding site (RBS), including the Shine–Dalgarno sequence.

For comparison, we also projected the conformational landscape of SAM-II using principal component analysis (PCA). Supporting Figure S3A shows the resulting PCA projection, with dots colored according to their Q values. Figure S3B displays the distribution of representative conformations from Figure B across both the ELViM and PCA landscapes. The representative conformations exhibit a similar relative distribution in both landscapes. However, the PF and F basins appear more compact in the PCA landscape, while the U–PF transition-state region is more diffuse. This contrast underscores the advantages of the ELViM landscape, which facilitates the identification of the transition-state region and provides a more detailed characterization of the PF basin, including the many local minima populated by partially folded structures.

In our unbiased simulations, five unfolding transitions were sampled, considering sufficiently equilibrated trajectory segments. Supporting Information Figure S4 illustrates the evolution of the Q coordinate during these transitions. Additionally, the figure displays the conformations involved in these transitions on the ELViM projection, color-coded according to their time step evolution. Remarkably, all transitions traverse the narrow region connecting the U and PF basins without any jumps, supporting the hypothesis of a well-defined transition-state ensemble.

For a more detailed examination of the transition-state ensemble (TSE), we divided this region in the projection into six sections. Conformations from each section were treated as distinct ensembles, representing different phases of the transition-state ensemble. Representative conformations for each section were obtained as previously described and are shown in Figure . Additional conformations are presented in Supporting Information Figure S5, which further illustrates the distribution of the representative conformations across both the ELViM and PCA landscapes. Interaction frequency maps, highlighting well-formed base-pairing and stacking interactions within and between regions, are provided in Supporting Information Figure S6.

3.

3

Representative conformations for the transition-state ensemble of the U–PF transition. The transition-state region was arbitrarily divided into six segments, which are illustrated by representative conformations. The analysis of these signatures suggests that the folding process starts with interactions between the internal segment of P1 and the L3, followed by P1–P1 interaction. A more detailed analysis of these regions is provided in Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6.

The representative conformations reveal interactions between the internal segment of P1 and the L3 loop, followed by the formation of the P1 helix and the tertiary P1–L3 interactions. Conformations from the TSE region characterized by signature (t i ) (Figure ) are largely unfolded but bring the L3 loop and the internal segment of P1 into proximity, allowing the initial formation of P1–L3 base-pairing interactions. These interactions become slightly more pronounced in the transition-state ensemble (TSE) regions t ii , t vi , and t v , where the 3′ end remains dynamic and flexible, adopting multiple orientations without forming significant contacts. In this context, the unpaired adenines in the L3 loop begin to exhibit some of the native stacking interactions.

The transition-state ensemble (TSE) regions represented by conformations t iii and t iv characterize TS2. The most frequent base pairings in these structures include G28–A35/A36 and C27–A36/A37. These interactions, along with stacking involving unpaired adenines, help stabilize the collapse of the central region. This stabilization facilitates the folding back of the unpaired 5′ end, enabling the formation of base pairings in the P1 helix (G3–C29, C4–G28, G5–C27), culminating in the establishment of the A-minor twist motif.

Lastly, we examined how base pairing and stacking frequencies vary along the reaction coordinate Q. The results are presented in Supporting Information Figure S7. This analysis confirms that the initial P1–L3 pairing interactions emerge within the range 0.375 < Q < 0.4 and become stronger in the region corresponding to TS1 (0.4 < Q < 0.425). A-minor interactions are well established around TS2 (Q ∼ 0.5). The pseudoknot interactions between P2b and L1 begin to appear at Q > 0.6. Finally, for Q > 0.9, we observe the frequent formation of the C16–G50 base pair from the P2a helix, indicating partial formation of this helical region.

Role of Mg2+ in the Rate-Limiting Step of RNA Folding

To investigate the role of Mg2+ ions in stabilizing the riboswitch structure, we quantified the average Mg2+ population associated with each phosphate group. This was achieved by calculating, for each trajectory frame, the number of Mg2+ ions within an 8 Å sphere centered on each phosphate group (P). This cutoff distance between Mg2+ and phosphate group has been estimated from the radial distribution function of Mg2+ around phosphates (Figure S1). Supporting Information Figure S8 illustrates the average Mg2+ population, highlighting that the highest populations occur around residues G6 (P1), C27 (P1), G39 (L3), and A41 (P2b). These key residues are situated within the A-minor twist motif and in proximity to the SAM binding site.

For a dynamic view of the interactions between SAM-II and Mg2+ ions, we analyzed how the Mg2+ population around each phosphate changes along the reaction coordinate. In the histogram depicted in Figure , the first row at the bottom corresponds to the interval Q < 0.4 (entirely unfolded) and shows that the Mg2+ population is negligible for all residues. As folding progresses, the Mg2+ population significantly increases for three groups of residues highlighted in violet. These groups consist of residues G5–C7 and C27–G28 from the P1 helix, and residues A37–G39 from the L3 loop, which form the A-minor twist motif and are involved in the stabilization of the U–PF transition, as previously described. The increased population of Mg2+ ions around these phosphates may play a critical role, promoting early collapse by screening electrostatic repulsion and further stabilizing interactions within the A-minor twist motif. At Q ≈ 0.6, the Mg2+ population increases around residues G8 from L1 and U40–A41 from the P2b helix. Finally, in the PF-F transition, at Q > 0.8, the Mg2+ population rises in three additional regions: residues U12–A14 from L1, G17–U18, and A46–A48 from P2b. These results suggest preferred Mg2+ visiting sites surrounding the SAM-binding site, underscoring the importance of Mg2+ in promoting stabilization of the tertiary structure.

4.

4

Average Mg2+ population per phosphate as a function of Q (fraction of native contacts). (A) Total of 140,000 frames were binned by Q (bin width = 0.05). For each bin, the average number of Mg2+ ions within 8 Å of each phosphate group was calculated. The resulting heatmap shows phosphate indices on the x-axis and Q bins on the y-axis. Residues with the highest average populations are highlighted in the histogram and mapped onto the secondary (B) and tertiary (C) structures with their corresponding color codes.

We also investigated whether specific Mg2+-mediated interactions are responsible for the tertiary folding of the structure. To explore this, we calculated Mg2+-mediated contact probability map between nonlocal phosphate groups (Figure ; see Supporting Information for details). Interestingly, we observed a highly frequent long-range interaction mediated by an Mg2+ ion between residues G28 and U38. This interaction is the most frequently observed in all simulations sampling the U–PF transition and folded states (from 96.6 TR to 104 TR).

5.

5

Mg2+-mediated contact probability map between nonlocal phosphate groups for the lowest temperature (96.5TR). (A) This map illustrates nonlocal contacts between phosphate groups that are mediated by Mg2+ ions. Notably, a contact between G28 and U38 is consistently mediated by Mg2+ in all simulations sampling the U–PF transition and folded states. (B) Two phosphate groups involved in this contact formation are highlighted as red spheres in the tertiary representation of SAM-II shown on the right.

As previously discussed, these residueslocated in the internal strand of P1 and in loop L3participate in the formation of the A-minor twist motif. Our analysis of base pairing and stacking interactions, both within the folding transition-state ensemble (Figure ) and across Q values (Supporting Information Figure S7), reveals that folding of the SAM-II riboswitch initiates with P1–L3 interactions involving these residues.

Notably, we observed that this key interaction, a rate-limiting step in the folding process, is mediated by Mg2+ ions. Overall, our findings suggest that partially folded conformations are stabilized by a Mg2+-mediated contact that anchors A-minor interactions, promotes a preorganized state, and potentially facilitates SAM binding and riboswitch function.

Discussion

In this study, we explored the folding mechanism of the SAM-II riboswitch. Using molecular dynamics simulations and the Energy Landscape Visualization Method (ELViM), we provided atomistic details of the folding transition process. Our analysis elucidated crucial base-pairings and stacking interactions, as well as the role of Mg2+ ions in these processes.

Previous theoretical and experimental studies have suggested that the conformational landscape of the SAM-II riboswitch is characterized by three distinct major basins: unfolded, partially folded, and folded. ,, The ELViM projection provided a comprehensive view of the effective phase space, clearly identifying these states. Remarkably, a narrow region connects the U and PF basins via the PO basin, suggesting a specific folding pathway for this transition, involving the formation of the A-minor twist motif.

The PF basin comprises partially folded conformations, where the 3′ end assumes different orientations as the number of base pairings increases toward the F basin. The last part to fold is the P2a helix containing the Shine–Dalgarno sequence. Based on the ELViM projection, we characterized in detail the U–PF transition-state ensemble, providing crucial base-pairing and stacking interactions. These findings were also demonstrated by the free-energy profile for SAM-II RNA representing all of the four conformational states.

In this study, we analyzed five representative unfolding transitions from unbiased simulations, which collectively characterized a single dominant pathway for the U–PO–PF transition. This transition, previously identified as a rate-limiting step, poses challenges for sampling. Additional breathing simulations, which exhibited reversible transitions along the same route, and the free energy profile obtained from umbrella sampling further supported the existence of this pathway. Moreover, the proposed mechanism is consistent with previous experimental findings. For instance, Haller et al. proposed, based on NMR and smFRET data analysis, that Mg2+ ions stabilize the P1–L3 segment, supporting the formation of the P1 helix and the stabilization of the loop L1 and binding pocket. The complete stabilization of the structure occurs, after SAM binding, with the overall formation of the P2a helix. Chemical probing experiments have also demonstrated that SAM binding contributes to the stabilization of L1 and P2a/b, while P1–L3 remains mostly unchanged, suggesting that P1–L3 is preorganized in the absence of the ligand. Conversely, Xue et al. using Replica Exchange Dynamics simulations in the absence of Mg2+ predicted an alternative folding pathway, where the folding of P2a/b precedes the formation of the P1 helix. However, to the best of our knowledge, this folding route has not yet been experimentally observed.

We also performed a detailed analysis of the RNA-Mg2+ interactions. The importance of Mg2+ in stabilizing the tertiary structure of riboswitches has long been addressed by theoretical and experimental studies, indicating that Mg2+ is required for SAM-II to achieve its well-folded structure. − ,, In this study, we explored the preferred Mg2+ binding sites by analyzing the average number of Mg2+ interactions with each phosphate group along the folding process. Our results revealed a cumulative effect of Mg2+ coordination that supports conformational changes during the folding process. The average population of Mg2+ is initially greater near the P1–L3, supporting the formation of the A-minor twist motif during the U–PF transition. Subsequently, as folding progresses, other preferred sites were identified in the P2b–L1 region. Interestingly, the largest Mg2+ average population was observed around U12 and A13 for Q values greater than 0.8 (Figure ). NMR titration experiments conducted by Chen et al. indicate that the binding of Mg2+ ions induces significant perturbation in U12. The authors showed that this perturbation facilitates the formation of new base-pairing, consequently promoting tertiary interactions between loops and stems. This process promotes the transition from the partially folded to a more compact state.

Magnesium-mediated contacts are crucial for the structural stabilization of riboswitches. , These ions interact with the phosphate backbone of RNA, creating bridges that hold the complex tertiary structure necessary for the riboswitch’s functionality. This stabilization allows the riboswitch to maintain preorganized conformations that favor ligand binding. In this study, an Mg2+ ion was found to mediate a contact between the G28 and U38 residues in all simulations sampling the U–PF transition and folded states, especially captured in the form of TS1 and TS2 ensembles. This Mg2+-mediated contact, in conjunction with long-range interactions within the A-minor twist motif, stabilizes a preorganized structure. This stabilization facilitates SAM binding and promotes the folding transition to the closed state.

Conclusions

In an early review, Doudna and Doherty brilliantly highlighted the contrasts between protein folding and RNA folding. They noted that, while both the folding processes are challenged by the large configurational entropy required to form ordered native states, each employs unique strategies to achieve its intricate architecture. Despite their differences, the distinctive strategy of RNA folding is still a frontier that remains largely unexplored. Building on this comparison, Chen and Dill later observed that RNA secondary structures often navigate rugged energy landscapes, with complex intermediate states playing a crucial functional role. Connecting these insights to structure-based mechanisms, we see that in both protein and RNA folding, the burial of hydrophobic residues serves as a driving force. For RNA, this hydrophobic effect of RNA bases is traditionally thought to facilitate the formation of secondary structures, but it also extends to the formation of many base-mediated tertiary structures. A striking example of this is found in the SAM-II riboswitch RNA, where a critical A-minor twist is formed, highlighting the importance of four stacked adenosine residues that stabilize the loop bases against the minor groove. Whether to facilitate the base-mediated or back-mediated tertiary connections, the critical role of ions is always acknowledged to mitigate the backbone-level repulsion.

In this regard, the DCC model has been particularly effective in exploring ion-mediated microscopic phenomena and the rugged energy landscape of RNA, characterizing each folding event of SAM-II riboswitch RNA. This model addresses the computational challenges associated with sampling long-time-scale dynamic processes. Specifically, it treats monovalent K+ ions implicitly using the generalized Manning counterion condensation theory and it is integrated with an all-atom structure-based model of RNA. ,, Given that the DCC model has now been validated against numerous experiments, , we are extending its applicability by exploring various multiscale phenomena associated with RNA folding and its dynamic ion environment. Additionally, the ELViM method has been employed for the first time to explore the complex multidimensional landscapes of such triplex RNA systems. This method reduces dimensionality and captures a simplified 2D phase space using a purely data-driven approach, without assuming specific reaction coordinates or a reference conformation. This reaction-free approach is particularly useful for capturing the conformational plasticity of RNA under its dynamic ion environment. Using advanced RNA simulation, umbrella sampling approach and energy landscape exploration methodologies, this study provides significant insights into the folding mechanism of the SAM-II riboswitch RNA. We highlight the critical, site-specific role of Mg2+ ions in stabilizing its translational ON state in the absence of a ligand. Unlike many other riboswitches, such as SAM-I, where the ON and OFF states represent two alternate folds and a shared sequence is exchanged during the ON–OFF transition, the SAM-II riboswitch is a unique example. All computational studies and experimental evidence indicate that under physiological Mg2+ concentration, it adopts at least a partially folded conformation, which often maintain a dynamic equilibrium between a partially open and partially closed state. These evidence bolster the structural characteristics necessary to facilitate the translational ON-state functionalities of the RNA.

In this direction, our key findings from this study are summarized below:

  • (i)

    ELViM analysis has provided detailed insights into the key base interactions that occur during the transition from the unfolded to the folded state, which is mediated by the partially open and the partially folded conformational ensembles.

  • (ii)

    This partially folded state represents an open state that culminates in the formation of an A-minor twist motif, a structure consistent with both early experimental data ,, and computational findings. In fact, experiments have shown that this is the predominant conformation in the absence of a ligand, corresponding to the translation-ON state.

  • (iii)

    The ELViM projection has also captured the transition state ensemble as the RNA moves from unfolded to partially folded conformations via the partially open state. This suggests that the folding process begins with interactions between the P1 helix and L3 loop, a critical functional motif known as the A-minor twist motif. These findings are well-supported by earlier free energy simulations results, which identified the association of the P1–L3 loop and subsequent formation of the P1 helix as rate-limiting steps in the folding pathway.

  • (iv)

    ELViM analysis, along with Mg2+-mediated contact mapping, reveals that the formation of the A-minor twist motif is anchored by a Mg2+-mediated contact. The influence of Mg2+ on the tertiary interaction between the P1 helix and L3 loop was previously assessed and schematically modeled by Haller et al. However, our study provides a precise structure-based mechanism at an atomistic resolution, showing that Mg2+ bridges G28 of the P1 helix and U38 of the L3 loop. This ion-sensitive location for Mg2+ is also supported by crystallographic data, where a Cesium (Cs+) ion, rather than Mg2+, appears to stabilize this flexible A-minor twist motif.

Overall, the study demonstrates how Mg2+-RNA interactions are reorganized throughout the folding process, reducing electrostatic repulsion and facilitating specific base-pairing and stacking interactions. Additionally, it highlights the necessity of advanced atomistic RNA simulation methods and ELViM-like approaches to deepen our understanding of the intricate dynamics involved in ion-mediated RNA folding mechanisms.

Supplementary Material

jp5c02586_si_001.pdf (13.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

VBPL was supported by the Brazilian agencies FAPESP (2022/07231-7 and 2023/02219-1) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq (Grant 310017/2020-3). Work at the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics was sponsored by the NSF (Grants PHY-2019745 and PHY-2210291) and by the Welch Foundation (Grant C-1792). JNO is a Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) Scholar in Cancer Research. We would like to thank AMD for the donation of critical hardware that made this work possible. S.R. and JNO particularly acknowledge the Rice University supercomputers for this collaborative work. S.R. acknowledges support from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) (Grant no. BT/12/IYBA/2019/12 and BT/PR40192/BTIS/137/69/2023). A.S. acknowledges support from the DST Inspire fellowship. A.M. acknowledges support from the CSIR-NET fellowship. We acknowledge generous support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)[RO1-GM110310 to K.Y.S.]. Generous allocations of computational resources on the Chicoma supercomputer by Los Alamos National Laboratory Institutional Computing.

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supporting Information files, or are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02586.

  • Additional methods, supplementary figures, Mg2+ radial distribution function, ELViM-PCA comparison, transition ensembles, interaction frequency maps, and a table of excess Mg2+ ions across conformational states (PDF)

¶.

R.G.V. and A.S. contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

R.G.V.: writingoriginal draft, methodology, data curation, validation. A.S.: writingoriginal draft, methodology, data curation, validation. A.M.: methodology, writing-original draft. K.Y.S.: analysis, validation, writingreview & editing, J.N.O.: analysis, validation, writingreview & editing, fund acquisition. S.R.: supervision, methodology, analysis, validation, writing, fund acquisition. V.B.P.L.: supervision, methodology, writing, analysis, validation, fund acquisition.

The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Mortimer S. A., Kidwell M. A., Doudna J. A.. Insights into RNA structure and function from genome-wide studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014;15:469–479. doi: 10.1038/nrg3681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Faure G., Ogurtsov A. Y., Shabalina S. A., Koonin E. V.. Role of mRNA structure in the control of protein folding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:10898–10911. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kwok C. K.. Dawn of the in vivo RNA structurome and interactome. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016;44:1395–1410. doi: 10.1042/BST20160075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ignatova Z., Narberhaus F.. Systematic probing of the bacterial RNA structurome to reveal new functions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017;36:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Piao M., Sun L., Zhang Q. C.. RNA regulations and functions decoded by transcriptome-wide RNA structure probing. Genomics, Proteomics Bioinf. 2017;15:267–278. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chin K., Sharp K. A., Honig B., Pyle A. M.. Calculating the electrostatic properties of RNA provides new insights into molecular interactions and function. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999;6:1055–1061. doi: 10.1038/14940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Misra V. K., Draper D. E.. Mg2+ binding to tRNA revisited: the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann model. J. Mol. Biol. 2000;299:813–825. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Di Palma F., Colizzi F., Bussi G.. Role of Magnesium Ions and Ligand Stacking in the Adenine Riboswitch Folding. Biophys. J. 2014;106:285a. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.1665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Draper D. E.. A guide to ions and RNA structure. RNA. 2004;10:335–343. doi: 10.1261/rna.5205404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Römer R., Hach R.. tRNA conformation and magnesium binding: A study of yeast phenylalanine-specific tRNA by a fluorescent indicator and differential melting curves. Eur. J. Biochem. 1975;55:271–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb02160.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Horiya S., Li X., Kawai G., Saito R., Katoh A., Kobayashi K., Harada K.. RNA LEGO: magnesium-dependent formation of specific RNA assemblies through kissing interactions. Chem. Biol. 2003;10:645–654. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(03)00146-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wyatt J. R., Puglisi J. D., Tinoco I. Jr. RNA pseudoknots: stability and loop size requirements. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;214:455–470. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90193-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Soto A. M., Misra V., Draper D. E.. Tertiary structure of an RNA pseudoknot is stabilized by “diffuse” Mg2+ ions. Biochemistry. 2007;46:2973–2983. doi: 10.1021/bi0616753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leipply D., Draper D. E.. Effects of Mg2+ on the free energy landscape for folding a purine riboswitch RNA. Biochemistry. 2011;50:2790–2799. doi: 10.1021/bi101948k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roy S., Lammert H., Hayes R. L., Chen B., LeBlanc R., Dayie T. K., Onuchic J. N., Sanbonmatsu K. Y.. A magnesium-induced triplex pre-organizes the SAM-II riboswitch. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13:e1005406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McCluskey K., Boudreault J., St-Pierre P., Perez-Gonlez C., Chauvier A., Rizzi A., Beauregard P. B., Lafontaine D. A., Penedo J. C.. Unprecedented tunability of riboswitch structure and regulatory function by sub-millimolar variations in physiological Mg2+ Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:6478–6487. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Suddala K. C., Wang J., Hou Q., Walter N. G.. Mg2+ shifts ligand-mediated folding of a riboswitch from induced-fit to conformational selection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:14075–14083. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roth A., Breaker R. R.. The structural and functional diversity of metabolite-binding riboswitches. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009;78:305–334. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.070507.135656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gelfand M. S., Mironov A. A., Jomantas J., Kozlov Y. I., Perumov D. A.. A conserved RNA structure element involved in the regulation of bacterial riboflavin synthesis genes. Trends Genet. 1999;15:439–442. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01856-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mironov A. S., Gusarov I., Rafikov R., Lopez L. E., Shatalin K., Kreneva R. A., Perumov D. A., Nudler E.. Sensing small molecules by nascent RNA: a mechanism to control transcription in bacteria. Cell. 2002;111:747–756. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01134-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nahvi A., Sudarsan N., Ebert M. S., Zou X., Brown K. L., Breaker R. R.. Genetic control by a metabolite binding mRNA. Chem. Biol. 2002;9:1043–1049. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(02)00224-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Winkler W., Nahvi A., Breaker R. R.. Thiamine derivatives bind messenger RNAs directly to regulate bacterial gene expression. Nature. 2002;419:952–956. doi: 10.1038/nature01145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Winkler W. C., Cohen-Chalamish S., Breaker R. R.. An mRNA structure that controls gene expression by binding FMN. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99:15908–15913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212628899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Haller A., Altman R. B., Soulière M. F., Blanchard S. C., Micura R.. Folding and ligand recognition of the TPP riboswitch aptamer at single-molecule resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:4188–4193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218062110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen B., LeBlanc R., Dayie T. K.. SAM-II Riboswitch Samples at least Two Conformations in Solution in the Absence of Ligand: Implications for Recognition. Angew. Chem. 2016;128:2774–2777. doi: 10.1002/ange.201509997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen B., Zuo X., Wang Y.-X., Dayie T. K.. Multiple conformations of SAM-II riboswitch detected with SAXS and NMR spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:3117–3130. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sarkar R., Mainan A., Roy S.. Influence of ion and hydration atmospheres on RNA structure and dynamics: insights from advanced theoretical and computational methods. Chem. Commun. 2024;60:3624–3644. doi: 10.1039/D3CC06105A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gonzalez, R. L. ; Tinoco, I. . Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Biological Macromolecules Part A. In Methods in Enzymology; James, T. L. ; Dötsch, V. ; Schmitz, U. , Eds.; Academic Press, 2002; Vol. 338; pp 421–443. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rüdisser S., Tinoco I. Jr. Solution structure of Cobalt­(III)­Hexammine complexed to the GAAA tetraloop, and metal-ion binding to G·A mismatches. J. Mol. Biol. 2000;295:1211–1223. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cate J. H., Doudna J. A.. Metal-binding sites in the major groove of a large ribozyme domain. Structure. 1996;4:1221–1229. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ramachandran V., Mainan A., Roy S.. Dynamic effects of the spine of hydrated magnesium on viral RNA pseudoknot structure. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022;24:24570–24581. doi: 10.1039/D2CP01075E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mainan A., Roy S.. Dynamic Counterion Condensation Model Decodes Functional Dynamics of RNA Pseudoknot in SARS-CoV-2: Control of Ion-Mediated Pierced Lasso Topology. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023;14:10402–10411. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mainan A., Kundu R., Singh R. K., Roy S.. Magnesium Regulates RNA Ring Dynamics and Folding in Subgenomic Flaviviral RNA. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2024;128:9680–9691. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c03981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Onuchic J. N., Luthey-Schulten Z., Wolynes P. G.. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1997;48:545–600. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Whitford P. C., Schug A., Saunders J., Hennelly S. P., Onuchic J. N., Sanbonmatsu K. Y.. Nonlocal helix formation is key to understanding S-adenosylmethionine-1 riboswitch function. Biophys. J. 2009;96:L7–L9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hayes R. L., Noel J. K., Mandic A., Whitford P. C., Sanbonmatsu K. Y., Mohanty U., Onuchic J. N.. Generalized Manning condensation model captures the RNA ion atmosphere. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:258105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.258105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gilbert S. D., Rambo R. P., Van Tyne D., Batey R. T.. Structure of the SAM-II riboswitch bound to S-adenosylmethionine. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008;15:177–182. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hilbers C. W., Michiels P. J., Heus H. A.. New developments in structure determination of pseudoknots. Biopolymers. 1998;48:137–153. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1998)48:2<137::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nissen P., Ippolito J. A., Ban N., Moore P. B., Steitz T. A.. RNA tertiary interactions in the large ribosomal subunit: the A-minor motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001;98:4899–4903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081082398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Battle D. J., Doudna J. A.. Specificity of RNA–RNA helix recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99:11676–11681. doi: 10.1073/pnas.182221799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Oliveira A. B., Yang H., Whitford P. C., Leite V. B. P.. Distinguishing Biomolecular Pathways and Metastable States. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019;15:6482–6490. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Viegas R. G., Martins I. B. S., Sanches M. N., Oliveira Junior A. B., Camargo J. B. d., Paulovich F. V., Leite V. B. P.. ELViM: Exploring Biomolecular Energy Landscapes through Multidimensional Visualition. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2024;64:3443–3450. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Oliveira A. B., Fatore F. M., Paulovich F. V., Oliveira O. N., Leite V. B. P.. Visualization of Protein Folding Funnels in Lattice Models. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dias R. V., Pedro R. P., Sanches M. N., Moreira G. C., Leite V. B., Caruso I. P., de Melo F. A., de Oliveira L. C.. Unveiling Metastable Ensembles of GRB2 and the Relevance of Interdomain Communication during Folding. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023;63:6344–6353. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. da Silva F. B., Martins de Oliveira V., de Oliveira Junior A. B., Contessoto V. d. G., Leite V. B. P.. Probing the Energy Landscape of Spectrin R15 and R16 and the Effects of Non-native Interactions. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023;127:1291–1300. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sanches M. N., Knapp K., Oliveira A. B., Wolynes P. G., Onuchic J. N., Leite V. B. P.. Examining the Ensembles of Amyloid-β Monomer Variants and Their Propensities to Form Fibers Using an Energy Landscape Visualization Method. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022;126:93–99. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c08525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Oliveira Junior A. B., Lin X., Kulkarni P., Onuchic J. N., Roy S., Leite V. B. P.. Exploring Energy Landscapes of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Insights into Functional Mechanisms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021;17:3178–3187. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Viegas R. G., Sanches M. N., Chen A. A., Paulovich F. V., Garcia A. E., Leite V. B. P.. Characterizing the Folding Transition-State Ensembles in the Energy Landscape of an RNA Tetraloop. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023;63:5641–5649. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Whitford P. C., Noel J. K., Gosavi S., Schug A., Sanbonmatsu K. Y., Onuchic J. N.. An all-atom structure-based potential for proteins: bridging minimal models with all-atom empirical forcefields. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2009;75:430–441. doi: 10.1002/prot.22253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Noel J. K., Whitford P. C., Sanbonmatsu K. Y., Onuchic J. N.. SMOG@ctbp: simplified deployment of structure-based models in GROMACS. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W657–W661. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Manning G. S.. Limiting laws and counterion condensation in polyelectrolyte solutions I. Colligative properties. J. Chem. Phys. 1969;51:924–933. doi: 10.1063/1.1672157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Manning G. S.. The molecular theory of polyelectrolyte solutions with applications to the electrostatic properties of polynucleotides. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1978;11:179–246. doi: 10.1017/S0033583500002031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Noel J. K., Whitford P. C., Onuchic J. N.. The shadow map: a general contact definition for capturing the dynamics of biomolecular folding and function. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2012;116:8692–8702. doi: 10.1021/jp300852d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Torrie G. M., Valleau J. P.. Monte Carlo free energy estimates using non-Boltzmann sampling: Application to the sub-critical Lennard-Jones fluid. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974;28:578–581. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(74)80109-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ferrenberg A. M., Swendsen R. H.. Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989;63:1195. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Shih A. Y., Arkhipov A., Freddolino P. L., Schulten K.. Coarse Grained Protein-Lipid Model with Application to Lipoprotein Particles. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:3674–3684. doi: 10.1021/jp0550816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K.. Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics. 1996;14:33–38. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hardin C., Eastwood M. P., Prentiss M. C., Luthey-Schulten Z., Wolynes P. G.. Associative memory Hamiltonians for structure prediction without homology: alpha/beta proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100:1679–1684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252753899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Cho S. S., Levy Y., Wolynes P. G.. P versus Q: Structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:586–591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509768103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tejada E., Minghim R., Nonato L. G.. On Improved Projection Techniques to Support Visual Exploration of Multi-Dimensional Data Sets. Inf. Visual. 2003;2:218–231. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Leontis N. B., Westhof E.. Geometric nomenclature and classification of RNA base pairs. RNA. 2001;7:499–512. doi: 10.1017/S1355838201002515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Haller A., Rieder U., Aigner M., Blanchard S. C., Micura R.. Conformational capture of the SAM-II riboswitch. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011;7:393–400. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Xue X., Yongjun W., Zhihong L.. Folding of SAM-II riboswitch explored by replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulation. J. Theor. Biol. 2015;365:265–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hammond M. C.. A tale of two riboswitches. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011;7:342–343. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sarkar R., Jaiswar A., Hennelly S. P., Onuchic J. N., Sanbonmatsu K. Y., Roy S.. Chelated Magnesium Logic Gate Regulates Riboswitch Pseudoknot Formation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2021;125:6479–6490. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c02467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Doudna J. A., Doherty E. A.. Emerging themes in RNA folding. Folding Des. 1997;2:R65–R70. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Chen S. J., Dill K. A.. RNA folding energy landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000;97:646–651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Roy S., Hennelly S. P., Lammert H., Onuchic J. N., Sanbonmatsu K. Y.. Magnesium controls aptamer-expression platform switching in the SAM-I riboswitch. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:3158–3170. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jp5c02586_si_001.pdf (13.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supporting Information files, or are available from the corresponding authors upon request.


Articles from The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES