In the published article, the article type was erroneously categorized as “Review”.
The correct article type is “Systematic Review,” as the manuscript was prepared and structured in accordance with systematic review methodology, including comprehensive database search strategies, predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment of included studies, and adherence to PRISMA reporting guidelines.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.