Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
. 2025 Sep 2;12:1628754. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1628754

Case Report: A hybrid approach of selective adrenal artery and venous embolization for the treatment of unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma

Changqiang Yang 1,2,3,, Sen Liu 1,2,3,, Peijian Wang 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC12436356  PMID: 40964526

Abstract

Selective adrenal artery embolization (SAAE) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive alternative to traditional therapies for primary aldosteronism (PA). However, incomplete ablation of aldosterone-producing adenomas (APA) tissue remains a key limitation. To address this challenge, we propose a novel hybrid approach integrating SAAE with selective adrenal venous embolization (SAVE), designed to optimize the therapeutic efficacy of APA. We report a 37-year-old man with confirmed unilateral PA. Left adrenal APA was diagnosed through computerized tomography and adrenal venous sampling. The patient underwent combined selective adrenal artery and venous embolization (SAAE-SAVE) for left-sided APA. Trans-catheter embolization of the dominant left adrenal artery and primary draining vein was performed using 2 ml anhydrous ethanol. This SAAE-SAVE protocol successfully normalized serum hypokalemia levels and achieved sustained blood pressure control at 1-month follow-up. SAAE-SAVE represents a transformative therapeutic alternative for APA treatment, and further research is needed to validate its safety and efficacy.

Keywords: aldosterone-producing adenomas, adrenal artery embolization, adrenal venous embolization, adrenal arteriography, adrenal venography

Introduction

Primary aldosteronism (PA), the most prevalent form of secondary hypertension, exhibits a severity-dependent prevalence ranging from 3.9% in stage 1 hypertension to 11.8% in stage 3 hypertension (1), with rates escalating to 17%–23% in resistant hypertension population (2). PA patients display an increased cardiovascular risk such as stroke, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation and heart failure, compared with patients with essential hypertension matched for age, sex and blood pressure (3). Etiologically, PA is broadly classified into six distinct subtypes. Unilateral disease, representing approximately 30% of cases, predominantly manifests as aldosterone-producing adenomas (APA) (4, 5). Current clinical guidelines recommend surgical adrenalectomy (laparoscopic or open approach) as the definitive therapy for unilateral PA (4, 6). Recent advances have expanded the therapeutic options to image-guided radiofrequency ablation techniques (CT-guided and endoscopic ultrasound-assisted), demonstrating promising APA-targeting efficacy (79). Notably, selective adrenal artery embolization (SAAE) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative for PA and is under active investigation (10). However, the therapeutic efficacy in unilateral APA remains debated due to incomplete ablation of APA tissue, leading to residual hormonal activity and disease recurrence (11). Preclinical study in swine models demonstrated partial adrenal infarction via balloon-occluded retrograde ethanol injection into the adrenal vein (12). It was suggested that retrograde ethanol injection into the adrenal vein might provide a viable therapeutic strategy for APA (13). Building on this evidence, we proposed an innovative hybrid approach integrating SAAE with selective adrenal venous embolization (SAVE), designed to optimize the therapeutic efficacy (Figure 1). We reported a case of left-sided APA treated with the SAAE-SAVE combination approach and resolved the hypokalemia and hypertension.

Figure 1.

Diagram showing the placement of catheters for SAAE and SAVE procedures in the abdominal area, highlighting key vessels: inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, renal artery and vein, adrenal gland, and phrenic vein. An inset image shows an X-ray view. The process involves embolization with anhydrous ethanol.

A hybrid approach of selective adrenal artery and venous embolization (SAAE-SAVE) for the treatment of aldosterone-producing adenomas. SAAE, superselective adrenal artery embolization; SAVE, superselective adrenal venous embolization.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old man diagnosed with hypertension for 3 years was referred to the cardiology department for evaluation of possible secondary hypertension. He denied prior cerebrovascular accidents or cardiovascular diseases. Anthropometric measurements revealed a height of 175 cm and weight of 74 kg, yielding a body mass index (BMI) of 24.16 kg/m2. His peak recorded blood pressure (BP) was 185/130 mmHg. Despite daily therapy with nifedipine extended-release tablets 30 mg and sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg, BP control remained suboptimal: office BP was 160/110 mmHg, while 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring showed an average of 134/85 mmHg (daytime: 140/93 mmHg; nighttime: 124/73 mmHg). Laboratory findings were as follows (Table 1): hemoglobin 156 g/L, white blood cell count 10.07 × 109/L, platelet count 243 × 109/L; serum potassium 3.26 mmol/L, sodium 142.7 mmol/L, calcium 2.36 mmol/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 60 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 28 U/L; uric acid 455 μmol/L, triglycerides 1.96 mmol/L, total cholesterol 5.31 mmol/L, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 3.73 mmol/L, and fasting blood glucose 4.95 mmol/L; creatinine 104.1 μmol/L, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 80.22 ml/min/1.73 m2. Routine urinalysis revealed no abnormalities (negative for protein, glucose, ketones, and leukocytes). To avoid interference with aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) assays, antihypertensive therapy was switched to doxazosin 8 mg daily and verapamil 240 mg daily over a one-month period. Direct renin concentration and aldosterone levels were measured using a chemiluminescent immunoassay platform at our center. Hormonal evaluation in the upright position revealed: plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) 937.18 pmol/L, suppressed renin 1.60 pg/ml, and ARR 585.74. In the supine position, results showed: PAC > 1,000 pmol/L, suppressed renin 1.71 pg/ml, and incalculable ARR due to unmeasurably high aldosterone levels. Circadian rhythm of serum cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone, plasma free metanephrines, and thyroid function were within normal range. The combination of markedly elevated aldosterone and suppressed renin suggested probable primary aldosteronism (PA). A supine saline suppression test was subsequently performed, involving intravenous infusion of 2 L of 0.9% sodium chloride solution over 4 h, with blood samples collected at baseline and post-infusion. Results demonstrated: baseline PAC > 1,000 pmol/L, renin 1.28 pg/ml; Post-infusion PAC > 1,000 pmol/L, renin 1.04 pg/ml. These findings confirmed autonomous aldosterone excess, supporting a PA diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced adrenal computed tomography (CT) scan identified a 1 cm left adrenal nodule with an attenuation value of 1 Hounsfield unit (HU), consistent with a lipid-rich adenoma (Figure 2).

Table 1.

Preoperative and post-operative laboratory results.

Variables Preoperative POD 1 POD 2 POD 3 Postoperative 1 Month Reference
Complete Blood Count
 Hemoglobin (g/L) 156 166 NA NA 151 120–160
 WBC (109/L) 10.07 14.44 NA NA 8.02 4–10
 Platelet (109/L) 243 231 NA NA 265 100–300
Serum electrolytes
 Potassium (mmol/L) 3.26 2.45 2.99 3.03 4.2 3.5–5.3
 Sodium (mmol/L) 142.7 141.7 142.7 139.6 138.2 137–147
 Calcium (mmol/L) 2.36 2.28 2.21 2.24 2.34 2.11–2.52
Liver function
 ALT (U/L) 60 52 NA NA 48 9–50
 AST (U/L) 28 32 NA NA 30 15–40
Metabolic panel results
 UA (μmol/L) 455 557 NA NA 420 200–415
 TG (mmol/L) 1.96 NA NA NA 1.87 <2.3
 TC (mmol/L) 5.31 NA NA NA 5.01 <5.17
 LDL-C (mmol/L) 3.73 NA NA NA 2.51 <3.36
 HDL-C (mmol/L) 1.30 NA NA NA 1.12 > 1.04
 FBG (mmol/L) 4.95 9.49 NA NA 5.32 3.89–6.11
Renal function
Creatinine (μmol/L) 104.1 94.6 NA NA 88.9 17.7–107
eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) 80.22 90.06 NA NA 97.09
Hormonal profile
 Supine Renin (pg/ml) 1.71 1.14 1.14 3.74 NA 2.4–32.8
 Supine Aldosterone (pg/ml) >1,000 175.29 80.61 68.00 NA 10–160
 Supine ARR NA 93.97 70.71 18.18 NA
 Upright Renin (pg/ml) 1.60 NA NA NA 4.52 3.8–38.8
 Upright Aldosterone (pg/ml) 937.18 NA NA NA 78.25 40–310
 Upright ARR 585.74 NA NA NA 17.31
Clinical data
 SBP (mmHg) 140–150 140–160 135–150 110–135 132
 DBP (mmHg) 78–110 80–105 73–100 70–95 82
 HR (bpm) 65–80 83–95 80–90 77–85 75
Antihypertensive drugs Doxazosin 8 mg and Verapamil 240 mg Without Drugs Without Drugs Without Drugs Without Drugs

POD, postoperative day; WBC, white blood count; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; UA, uric acid; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ARR, aldosterone renin ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate.

Figure 2.

Two-panel CT scan displays abdominal images. Panel A shows a cross-sectional view with a white arrow pointing to a significant area near the spine. Panel B presents a coronal view highlighting the same region, also indicated by a white arrow.

Adrenal gland CT scan showed a lipid-rich left adrenal nodule (arrows) [(A) non-contrast enhanced CT; (B) contrast-enhanced CT].

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) without adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation was performed via the femoral vein approach. Blood samples were collected selectively from the right adrenal vein (RAV), left adrenal vein (LAV), and the distal inferior vena cava (IVC). AVS results were presented in Table 2. The lateralization index (LI) for the left adrenal gland was 44.1, with a contralateral suppression index (CSI) of 0.036 for the right adrenal gland. These findings indicated excessive aldosterone secretion from the left adrenal gland, consistent with the international consensus for subtyping PA (14). Surgical resection of the left adrenal gland was recommended; however, the patient declined surgery and expressed unwillingness to undergo long-term mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy. Following obtainment of written informed consent, a novel hybrid approach termed SAAE-SAVE using anhydrous ethanol was performed.

Table 2.

Adrenal vein sampling results.

Sample A (pg/ml) C (nmol/L) A/C SI LI CSI
IVC 1,422.00 273.2 5.20 NA NA NA
RAV 1,630.00 8,381.0 0.19 30.67 NA 0.036
LAV 47,825.00 5,706.1 8.38 20.88 44.10 NA

A, aldosterone; C, cortisol; A/C, aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio; SI, selective index; LI, lateralization index; CSI, contralateral suppression index; IVC, inferior vena cava; RAV, right adrenal vein; LAV, left adrenal vein.

Preoperatively, the patient received antihypertensive therapy with doxazosin (8 mg once daily) and verapamil (240 mg once daily). His blood pressure was maintained at 140–150/78–110 mm Hg with a heart rate of 65–80 beats/min (Table 1). The SAAE procedure was performed through right femoral arterial and venous access under local infiltration anesthesia, as previously reported (15). A 6-Fr Judkins right (JR 3.5) catheter (Launcher, Medtronic, USA) was inserted into the femoral artery through a 6-Fr sheath and the catheter was positioned to abdominal aorta at the level of vertebrae T 12-L 1. Non-selective arteriography was performed to visualize the left adrenal arteries (Figure 3A). A 6-Fr Judkins (JR 3.5) guiding catheter was employed for super-selective cannulation of the left adrenal artery, followed by the insertion of a Fielder XT-R guidewire. After positioning the micro-catheter within the proximal to mid segments of the left adrenal artery, adrenal arteriography was performed to identify the tumor-supplying artery of the aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and delineate the entire adenoma staining area (Figure 3B). Concurrently, a second catheter was introduced via femoral vein access and advanced distally into the left adrenal central vein draining functional adenomas, with careful avoidance of the inferior phrenic venous branch. Prudent retrograde venography and adrenal arteriography were performed concurrently to delineate the anatomy of the adrenal venous plexus and the adenoma (Figure 3C). To minimize the risk of anhydrous ethanol backflow entering non-target arteries, the balloon dilation catheter was inflated using a dedicated inflation device prior to anhydrous ethanol injection. For prophylactic analgesia, a 5 mg of morphine was administered intravenously during the procedure. The targeted left adrenal artery was then embolized under fluoroscopic guidance via slow, controlled injection of 2.0 ml of lidocaine followed by 2.0 ml of anhydrous ethanol through a micro-catheter. Post-embolization angiography demonstrated absence of ante-grade flow within the feeding arteries and attenuation of tumor staining, confirming the technical success of the procedure (Figure 3D). To ensure comprehensive embolization of the APA, the catheter was repositioned to the intra-adrenal venous plexus, and balloon-occluded retrograde trans-venous ethanol injection was performed. Specifically, a micro-balloon catheter was positioned in the left adrenal vein. Subsequently, anhydrous ethanol was administered retrogradely under balloon occlusion to induce partial infarction within the APA. Post-procedural venography confirmed markedly reduced opacification of the intra-adrenal venous plexus, indicating successful embolization (Figure 3E). During the SAAE and SAVE procedure, both intra-arterial and intravenous injections of anhydrous ethanol induced acute BP elevation, with blood pressure rapidly escalating to 200/120 mmHg. Sodium nitroprusside infusion was immediately initiated under continuous arterial pressure monitoring. This intervention effectively prevented further blood pressure elevation and achieved a controlled reduction to baseline levels within 3–5 min. Consequently, transient hypertension throughout the entire surgical procedure was successfully managed by intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside.

Figure 3.

Panel A shows an angiogram highlighting the left adrenal artery. Panel B displays a contrast-enhanced adenoma enclosed by a dashed circle. Panel C illustrates the intra-adrenal venous plexus with labeled arrows. Panel D shows a catheter navigating towards the target area. Panel E highlights the targeted region with multiple arrows indicating the surrounding area.

(A) Abdominal aortography; (B) left adrenal arteriography; (C) simultaneous left adrenal venography and arteriography; (D) left adrenal arteriography post embolization; (E) left adrenal venography post embolization.

The patient was transferred to the coronary care unit postoperatively and received continuous electrocardiographic monitoring until postoperative day 3. Post-intervention hematological parameters and clinical data were summarized in Table 1. Post-intervention assessments demonstrated a gradual normalization of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR), and blood pressure progressively declined and ultimately stabilized within the normal range. On postoperative day 1 (POD1), a significant decrease in aldosterone levels (PAC = 175.29 pg/ml) was noted. However, renin suppression persisted (renin = 1.14 pg/ml) and ARR still elevated (ARR = 93.97). By POD2, aldosterone concentrations further declined to near-physiological ranges (PAC = 80.61 pg/ml), while renin-aldosterone axis dysfunction persisted (renin = 1.14 pg/ml, ARR = 70.71). Notably, physiological equilibrium was restored by POD3, characterized by complete resolution of renin suppression (renin = 3.74 pg/ml), sustained decrease in aldosterone concentrations (PAC = 68.00 pg/ml) and ARR normalization (ARR = 18.18), indicating restored negative feedback mechanisms. The patient was discharged on POD 3. At the 1-month follow-up, serum potassium concentration remained within normal range (4.2 mmol/L; reference: 3.5–5.0 mmol/L) without potassium supplementation. Both clinic blood pressure (132/82 mmHg) and 24 h average blood pressure (124/71 mmHg) were maintained within acceptable limits off antihypertensive therapy. Concurrent aldosterone-renin ratio testing revealed persistently low serum aldosterone (PAC = 78.25 pg/ml) alongside complete reversal of prior renin suppression (renin = 4.52 pg/ml). These results indicated that the patient achieved complete biochemical success and clinical cure of hypertension during the observation period, according to the PASO criteria (16).

Discussion

We reported a case of treatment-refractory hypertension and persistent hypokalemia secondary to unilateral PA caused by a left adrenal aldosterone-producing adenoma. The patient was successfully managed using a novel hybrid approach combining selective adrenal artery and venous embolization (SAAE-SAVE) with anhydrous ethanol, achieving complete biochemical remission and hypertension resolution.

It is 70 years since the discovery of PA (17). For much of this period, management of unilateral PA has scarcely changed since the advent of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in the 1990s. The imperative for clinical innovation is driven by overwhelming evidence that PA represents the most common potentially curable etiology of hypertension (1). SAAE has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option for PA patients who are either unwilling or unable to undergo surgical adrenalectomy and cannot tolerate or refuse mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (15). Compared to traditional surgical approaches, SAAE is less invasive and associated with a lower incidence of complications. However, the therapeutic efficacy of SAAE remains subject to debate, especially in unilateral PA (18). Previous article published by Hokotate et al. evaluated the effectiveness and long-term follow-up results of SAAE in 33 aldosteronoma cases (11). SAAE was successful in 27 (82%) of 33 patients. In one patient, aldosteronoma recurred 15 months after SAAE. In addition, a recent article published by Sun et al. compared the clinical and biochemical outcomes of adrenalectomy (n = 52) with catheter-based adrenal ablation (trans-arterial embolization) (n = 60) for unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma patients at 6 months of treatment (19). According to the PASO criteria (16), complete clinical success was achieved in 21 (40.4%) patients in the ablation group vs. 33 (55.0%) patients in the adrenalectomy group. Complete biochemical success was achieved in 30 (57.7%) patients in the ablation group vs. 51 (85.0%) patients in the adrenalectomy group. The efficacy of SAAE for unilateral APA in the present study was lower than those undergoing surgical adrenalectomy. A potential explanation is that SAAE may not achieve complete destruction of the entire APA, resulting in only partial destruction of the adenoma confirmed by 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT images (20). Previous study has demonstrated that adrenal ablation by retrograde venous ethanol injection is available (21). Therefore, we firstly introduced the selective adrenal artery and venous embolization (SAAE—SAVE) technique for the management of adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas.

In this case, selective adrenal artery angiography identified the feeding arterial branches of the APA. Trans-catheter intra-arterial injection of anhydrous ethanol into the APA's blood supply allowed diffusion into the adenoma tissue via bloodstream, inducing targeted necrosis. Concurrently, ethanol-mediated vascular occlusion interrupted perfusion, further promoting lesion devitalization. In this case, post-embolization angiography confirmed disappearance of tumor staining and adrenal arterial occlusion. This dual mechanism achieved the therapeutic goal of normalizing aldosterone secretion. Given incomplete ablation of APA tissue, we performed retrograde administration of anhydrous ethanol via the adrenal venous system to achieve chemical ablation. Pre-procedural retrograde venography precisely delineated adrenal venous plexus anatomy. Following micro-balloon catheter insertion into the left adrenal vein, balloon occlusion during ethanol infusion induced targeted partial APA infarction. Post-procedural venography demonstrated significantly reduced intra-adrenal plexus filling. This approach achieved: 1. marked aldosterone reduction, 2. complete biochemical cure of PA, and 3. sustained hypertension resolution throughout follow-up.

As with all novel therapeutic interventions, promising efficacy and safety warrant careful evaluation to mitigate premature implementation. In the case report, during the SAAE and SAVE procedures, both intra-arterial and intravenous injections of anhydrous ethanol induced acute BP elevation. The BP rapidly escalated to 200/120 mmHg, a phenomenon primarily attributed to catecholamine release triggered by ethanol-induced ablation of adrenal cells. This mechanism was corroborated by our previous study demonstrating a 3- to 100-fold increase in catecholamine levels (including dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine) via ipsilateral adrenal vein sampling during SAAE (15). These findings suggest that ethanol injection may cause destruction of adrenal medullary tissue, resulting in rapid release of substantial catecholamine stores, thereby contributing to the observed hemodynamic instability. Although, it seems a dangerous procedure, sodium nitroprusside infusion under continuous arterial pressure monitoring can effectively prevent further BP elevation and achieved controlled reduction to baseline levels within 3–5 min. Consequently, transient hypertension throughout the combined SAAE and SAVE procedures can be effectively managed via sodium nitroprusside administration. In addition, the current SAAE-SAVE technique using anhydrous ethanol is anatomically restricted to left-sided aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) due to consistent left adrenal vein anatomy (22). Technical application to right-sided APAs remains challenging given the right adrenal vein's characteristically short length, which complicates catheter placement (23). Future prospective studies must validate SAAE-SAVE's safety and efficacy profile while establishing formal patient selection criteria. Long-term monitoring of adrenal function and cardiovascular outcomes will ultimately determine its viability as a potential alternative to laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Conclusions

SAAE-SAVE represents a transformative therapeutic alternative for aldosterone-producing adenoma. Further broader validation of its safety-efficacy profile across diverse clinical scenarios remains is warranted.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from Key Project of Sichuan Natural Science Foundation (No.2024NSFSC0051), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82300333), the CMC Excellent-talent Program (No. 2024kjTzn05), Central Funds Guiding the Local Science and Technology Development of Sichuan Province (No. 2024ZYD0148), Innovation Team Project of Sichuan Provincial Health Commission (No. 24CXTD01), National Key Clinical Specialties Construction (No. 2024GXNKG002) and Organized Scientific Research Projects of Chengdu Medical College (No. CYYZZ24-04).

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

CY: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Data curation. SL: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. PW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Monticone S, Burrello J, Tizzani D, Bertello C, Viola A, Buffolo F, et al. Prevalence and clinical manifestations of primary aldosteronism encountered in primary care practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 69:1811–20. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Calhoun DA. Is there an unrecognized epidemic of primary aldosteronism? Pro. Hypertension. (2007) 50:447–53. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.106.086116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Monticone S, D'Ascenzo F, Moretti C, Williams TA, Veglio F, Gaita F, et al. Cardiovascular events and target organ damage in primary aldosteronism compared with essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2018) 6:41–50. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30319-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Funder JW, Carey RM, Mantero F, Murad MH, Reincke M, Shibata H, et al. The management of primary aldosteronism: case detection, diagnosis, and treatment: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 101:1889–916. 10.1210/jc.2015-4061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Young WF, Jr. Diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism: practical clinical perspectives. J Intern Med. (2019) 285:126–48. 10.1111/joim.12831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mulatero P, Monticone S, Deinum J, Amar L, Prejbisz A, Zennaro MC, et al. Genetics, prevalence, screening and confirmation of primary aldosteronism: a position statement and consensus of the working group on endocrine hypertension of the European society of hypertension. J Hypertens. (2020) 38:1919–28. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang MH, Tyan YS, Huang YH, Wang SC, Chen SL. Comparison of radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for benign aldosterone-producing adenoma. Radiol Med. (2016) 121:811–9. 10.1007/s11547-016-0662-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Argentesi G, Wu X, Ney A, Goodchild E, Laycock K, Lee YN, et al. Endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, radiofrequency ablation of aldosterone-producing adenomas (FABULAS): a UK, multicentre, prospective, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. (2025) 405:637–47. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02755-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu SY, Chu CC, Tsui TK, Wong SK, Kong AP, Chiu PW, et al. Aldosterone-producing adenoma in primary aldosteronism: CT-guided radiofrequency ablation-long-term results and recurrence rate. Radiology. (2016) 281:625–34. 10.1148/radiol.2016152277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yoshida Y, Shibata H. Evolution of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, aldosterone synthase inhibitors, and alternative treatments for managing primary aldosteronism. Hypertens Res. (2025) 48:854–61. 10.1038/s41440-024-01970-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hokotate H, Inoue H, Baba Y, Tsuchimochi S, Nakajo M. Aldosteronomas: experience with superselective adrenal arterial embolization in 33 cases. Radiology. (2003) 227:401–6. 10.1148/radiol.2272011798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Inoue A, Ohta S, Nitta N, Tsuboi S, Sonoda A, Tomozawa Y, et al. Adrenal obliteration by balloon-occluded retrograde venous ethanol injection in a swine model. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. (2017) 26:322–30. 10.1080/13645706.2017.1326386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mathias CJ, Peart WS, Carron DB, Hemingway AP, Allison DJ. Therapeutic venous infarction of an aldosterone producing adenoma (Conn's tumour). Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). (1984) 288:1416–7. 10.1136/bmj.288.6428.1416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rossi GP, Auchus RJ, Brown M, Lenders JW, Naruse M, Plouin PF, et al. An expert consensus statement on use of adrenal vein sampling for the subtyping of primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. (2014) 63:151–60. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu S, Wang X, Wang P. The application value of ipsilateral superselective adrenal arteriography and adrenal venography in patients with primary aldosteronism undergoing adrenal artery embolization. Hypertens Res. (2025) 48(4):1422–7. 10.1038/s41440-025-02126-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Williams TA, Lenders J, Mulatero P, Burrello J, Rottenkolber M, Adolf C, et al. Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: an international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2017) 5:689–99. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30135-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Conn JW. Presidential address. I. Painting background. II. Primary aldosteronism, a new clinical syndrome. J Lab Clin Med. (1955) 45:3–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shibata H. Adrenal ablation therapy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: pros and cons. Hypertens Res. (2023) 46:787–9. 10.1038/s41440-022-01143-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sun F, Liu X, Zhang H, Zhou X, Zhao Z, He H, et al. Catheter-based adrenal ablation: an alternative therapy for patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma. Hypertens Res. (2023) 46:91–9. 10.1038/s41440-022-01034-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li M, Guan L, Yang L, Li W, Xia Z, Mao M, et al. (68)Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for the assessment of therapeutic outcomes following superselective adrenal arterial embolization in patients with primary aldosteronism. EJNMMI Res. (2025) 15:5. 10.1186/s13550-024-01194-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Doppman JL, Girton M. Adrenal ablation by retrograde venous ethanol injection: an ineffective and dangerous procedure. Radiology. (1984) 150:667–72. 10.1148/radiology.150.3.6695065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Scholten A, Cisco RM, Vriens MR, Shen WT, Duh QY. Variant adrenal venous anatomy in 546 laparoscopic adrenalectomies. JAMA Surg. (2013) 148:378–83. 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matsuura T, Takase K, Ota H, Yamada T, Sato A, Satoh F, et al. Radiologic anatomy of the right adrenal vein: preliminary experience with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2008) 191:402–8. 10.2214/AJR.07.3338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.


Articles from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES