Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1981;319:193–203. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013901

Variation of muscle stiffness with tension during tension transients and constant velocity shortening in the frog.

F J Julian, D L Morgan
PMCID: PMC1243831  PMID: 6976429

Abstract

1. The length changes of a central segment of a frog muscle fibre were measured during and after a quick shortening was applied to the end of the fibre, by attaching two markers an using a spot follower apparatus. In this way it was shown that the stiffness of tetanized single frog fibres as mounted in our apparatus was located predominantly in the sarcomeres, and that the ends were comparatively stiff. 2. The stiffness of tetanized frog single fibres at 0 degrees was measured by applying a small 4 kHz sinusoidal length change, and measuring the resultant tension change. This was done during the first few milliseconds after a quick release, and while the fibre was shortening at constant velocity. 3. The stiffness during the fast tension transient after a quick release was always less than the stiffness before release, supporting the idea that the fast recovery is not due to attachment of extra cross-bridges. 4. The stiffness during the steady shortening was always less than when isometric. A line fitted to this stiffness-tension plot, when extended, intercepted the stiffness axis at less than half the isometric value. 5. The slope of the stiffness-force plot during the fast tension transient was consistently and significantly less than the slope of the stiffness-force plot during steady shortening, further supporting the conclusion that only a small part of the decrease seen during shortening could be due to non-linear end compliance. 6. Possible ways of reconciling these results with recent reports of X-ray diffraction suggesting little if any change in the position of myosin heads during steady shortening are discussed.

Full text

PDF
193

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proceedings: Mechanism of early tension recovery after a quick release in tetanized muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):42P–43P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):441–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:219–249. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. Tension development in highly stretched vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):143–169. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Julian F. J., Morgan D. L. Intersarcomere dynamics during fixed-end tetanic contractions of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:365–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Julian F. J., Morgan D. L. Tension, stiffness, unloaded shortening speed and potentiation of frog muscle fibres at sarcomere lengths below optimum. J Physiol. 1981;319:205–217. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lymn R. W. Myosin subfragment-1 attachment to actin. Expected effect on equatorial reflections. Biophys J. 1978 Jan;21(1):93–98. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85510-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore P. B., Huxley H. E., DeRosier D. J. Three-dimensional reconstruction of F-actin, thin filaments and decorated thin filaments. J Mol Biol. 1970 Jun 14;50(2):279–295. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90192-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Podolsky R. J., Nolan A. C., Zaveler S. A. Cross-bridge properties derived from muscle isotonic velocity transients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Oct;64(2):504–511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.64.2.504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Podolsky R. J., St Onge H., Yu L., Lymn R. W. X-ray diffraction of actively shortening muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):813–817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.3.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reedy M. K., Holmes K. C., Tregear R. T. Induced changes in orientation of the cross-bridges of glycerinated insect flight muscle. Nature. 1965 Sep 18;207(5003):1276–1280. doi: 10.1038/2071276a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sugi H., Tameyasu T. The origin of the instantaneous elasticity in single frog muscle fibres. Experientia. 1979 Feb 15;35(2):227–228. doi: 10.1007/BF01920632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES