Abstract
In the last decade, the healthcare system has changed due to circumstances such as a codification of accountable care organizations and a pivot to telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to increased gaps in care, pregnancy-related complications, and mistrust in the healthcare system, it is important that pregnancy care be centered around specific patient health values and needs. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine proposes a list of potential maternity care team members to care for patients during the prepregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum periods. We believe that the incorporation of a comprehensive maternity care team can help inform patient-centered policy, parallel the pace of medical advancement, mitigate health inequities, and enhance patient trust.
Keywords: maternal-fetal medicine, maternity care team, pregnancy-related complications
1 |. REDEFINING THE MATERNITY CARE TEAM MODEL
Since the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) published a special report on maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) subspecialists’ role in 2014 [1], the healthcare ecosystem has significantly shifted. From the codification of accountable care organizations [2] and a shift toward team- and hospitalist-based care to the accelerated implementation of telemedicine in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, [3] maternity care teams and care delivery methods have transformed over the past decade. In this SMFM Special Statement, we review several changes that have affected the practice of MFM and call for redefining the maternity care team model.
First, there is a growing divide between the urban and rural healthcare experience, and the number of maternity care deserts is increasing amid rising closures of rural hospitals [4]. Maternity care deserts are “counties where there are no hospitals offering obstetric care and no obstetric providers.” [5] In 2022, 36% of US counties, primarily rural, qualified as maternity care deserts [4]. This represents a 2% increase since 2020 and affected 2.2 million reproductive-aged persons [4]. Only 7% of maternity care providers, the majority of whom are not MFM subspecialists, currently practice in rural areas [4]. As a result, the MFM subspecialist’s role has expanded to provide obstetric care at greater distances via telemedicine. This shift has increased access, but 20% of US counties still have suboptimal internet access, impeding participation in virtual visits [5]. Additionally, while telehealth can be a vital tool, it does not replace in-person care for pregnant people. For those seeking in-person care, transportation remains a significant barrier, and the interaction between geography and social determinants of health (SDOH) in maternity care deserts contributes to poor obstetric outcomes in an already vulnerable population. For instance, the proportion of birthing individuals living in counties below the national median household income is twice as high in maternity care deserts compared to full access counties (90.1% vs. 45.2%), and reproductive-age individuals in these areas are more likely to suffer from asthma, hypertension, tobacco use, and preterm birth [6]. One way of bridging the urgent divide between urban and rural communities is to expand the maternity care team.
The current obstetric population, as compared to 10 years ago, is more acutely and chronically ill, with increasing rates of pregnancy-related complications, maternal mortality, cesarean delivery, preexisting conditions, and mental health needs [7]. Among reproductive-age individuals in 11 countries, US residents were the least likely to have a primary care clinician. Additionally, they were more likely to report difficulty affording medical care and to delay or defer care [7]. Concurrently, as patients are more complex yet experience social, economic, and political barriers to care, there is increasing demand for subspeciality care. Advancements in our field offer new opportunities to intervene in maternal and fetal conditions and may improve perinatal outcomes. Examples include innovation in medical device technology [8], surgical approaches [9], fetal intervention [10], and genetic screening and diagnostic options [11] —many of which did not exist 10 years ago. Thus, an updated understanding of the maternity care team is necessary to delineate the varying roles of the MFM subspecialist and care partners.
Lastly, there is rising awareness of mistrust surrounding healthcare systems and health information, which was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic [12]. Medical mistrust may stem from individual negative experiences with healthcare as well as historical injustices against marginalized groups [13]. MFM subspecialists care for a diverse population, but this diversity is not reflected in the demographic composition of our physician workforce [14]. Incorporating trained professionals providing culturally concordant support during pregnancy, delivery, and post-partum, such as through doula services, is an important strategy for maternity care teams to regain and promote patient trust [15–18].
For all these complex and evolving reasons, and because each patient has a different set of healthcare values and needs, care is best optimized when provided by a coalition of dedicated maternity care team members. The core maternity care team and proposed additional members are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Core maternity care team and additional members.
| Maternity care teama | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Previously included members1 | Additional members |
|
| |
| • Certified nurse midwives and certified midwives • Family physicians • Maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) subspecialists • Nurse practitioners • Obstetrician gynecologists • Obstetric-gynecologic hospitalists • Physician assistants |
• Anesthesiologists • Community healthcare workers • Diabetes educators (dieticians, nutritionists) • Doulas • Genetic counselors • Mental healthcare providers • Other subspecialists in obstetrics gynecology (complex family planning, reproductive endocrinology and infertility, gynecology oncology) • Patient navigators • Neonatologists • Referral networks for abortion care • Registered nurses and other nursing staff • Safety training, simulation, risk, and quality personnel • Social workers • Sonographers |
Teams will vary based on patient needs and may only include some of the members mentioned above. Certain roles may not be fulfilled in regions with limited resources or legislative restrictions.
Several essential tenets contribute to the maternity care team functioning effectively. These include pregnant people having timely access to care and appropriate risk assessment. Additionally, the members of the care team must have well-defined roles in the patient’s care, collaborative spirit, clear communication, and explicit policies explaining criteria for consultations, co-management, and transfer of care [1]. Members of the team should also be active in the postpartum transition from maternity care to primary and specialty care.
The role of the MFM subspecialist in collaboration with the entire maternity care team is important for patients and policymakers, particularly as past policy efforts have included a limited subset of providers [19, 20]. We outline the full team of clinicians and allied health professionals that should be supported in the care of high-risk patients in the prepregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum periods. Full recognition of this transformed maternity care team is an intentional step toward achieving reproductive justice for pregnant and birthing persons. Any policies that seek to improve health outcomes for pregnant individuals should attempt to incorporate the full maternity care team. Examples of advocacy include allotting funding for non-traditional members of the maternity care team and expanding a diverse workforce beyond obstetricians and gynecologists to include social workers, nurses, and interdisciplinary colleagues. SMFM proposes that our society, healthcare systems, and individuals recognize additional members of the maternity care team so that policies fulfill our patients’ needs. In addition to improving care outcomes, a complete and seamless maternity care team informs patient-centered policy, parallels the pace of medical advancement, mitigates health inequities, and enhances patient trust.
REFERENCES
- 1.Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Sciscione A Berghella V, Blackwell S, Boggess K, Helfgott A, Iriye B, et al. 2014. “Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Special Report: The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Subspecialists’ Role within a Health Care System,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 211(6): 607–16. 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blumenthal D and Abrams M 2020. “The Affordable Care Act at 10 Years—Payment and Delivery System Reforms,” New England Journal of Medicine 382(11): 1057–1063. 10.1056/NEJMhpr1916092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peahl AF and Howell JD, 2021. “The Evolution of Prenatal Care Delivery Guidelines in the United States,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 224(4): 339–347, 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Simpson KR, 2023. “March of Dimes Report on Access to Maternity Care in the United States,” MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 48(2): 111, 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stewart SD, and Henderson Z. Nowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US 2022 Report. March of Dimes. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.marchofdimes.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/2022_Maternity_Care_Report.pdf
- 6.Kozhimannil KB, Hung P, Henning-Smith C, Casey MM, and Prasad S, 2018. “Association between Loss of Hospital-Based Obstetric Services and Birth Outcomes in Rural Counties in the United States,” JAMA 319(12): 1239–1247, 10.1001/jama.2018.1830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gunja MZ, Seervai S, Zephyrin LC, and Williams RD. The Commonwealth Fund. Accessed May 28, 2024. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2022/apr/health-and-health-care-women-reproductive-age.
- 8.Jackson TL and Tuuli MG, 2023. “Intrauterine Postpartum Hemorrhage-Control Devices,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 142(5): 1000–1005, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Einerson BD, Healy AJ, Lee A, Warrick C, Combs CA, Hameed AB et al. , 2024. “Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Emergency Checklist, Planning Worksheet, And System Preparedness Bundle for Placenta Accreta Spectrum,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 230(1): B2–B11, 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moon-Grady AJ, Baschat A, Cass D, Choolani M, Copel JA, Crombleholme TM, Deprest J, et al. , 2017. “Fetal Treatment 2017: The Evolution of Fetal Therapy Centers—A Joint Opinion from the International Fetal Medicine and Surgical Society (IFMSS) and the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet),” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 42(4): 241–248, 10.1159/000475929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2018. “ACOG Technology Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 14 Summary: Modern Genetics in Obstetrics and Gynecology,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 132(3): 807–808. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Runzhi Wang JC, Izadi L, and Sao S, 2023. “Medical Mistrust among Pregnant Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 141(5S): 2S. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martha Hostetter SK The Commonwealth Fund. Accessed May 28, 2024. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletter-article/2021/jan/medical-mistrust-among-black-americans.
- 14.Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Electronic address pso, Greenberg MB, Gandhi M, Davidson C, Carter EB, and Publications C, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Electronic address pso, 2022. “Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #62: Best Practices in Equitable Care Delivery—Addressing Systemic Racism and Other Social Determinants of Health as Causes of Obstetrical Disparities,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 227(2): B44–B59, 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, and Cuthbert A, 2017. “Continuous Support for Women during Childbirth,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7(7): CD003766, 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, and Sakala C, 2003. “Continuous Support for Women during Childbirth,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3: CD003766, 10.1002/14651858.CD003766. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kennell J, Klaus M, McGrath S, Robertson S, and Hinkley C, 1991. “Continuous Emotional Support during Labor in a US Hospital. A Randomized Controlled Trial,” JAMA 265(17): 2197–2201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kozhimannil KB, Vogelsang CA, Hardeman RR, and Prasad S, 2016. “Disrupting the Pathways of Social Determinants of Health: Doula Support during Pregnancy and Childbirth,” Journal of American Board of Family Medicine 29(3): 308–317, 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150300. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Priti Khanal AB, Silverman K, and Maul A. Center for Health Care Strategies. Accessed May 28, 2024. https://www.chcs.org/resource/covering-doula-services-under-medicaid-design-and-implementation-considerations-for-promoting-access-and-health-equity/.
- 20.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Transforming Maternal Health (TMaH) Model. Accessed May 28, 2024. https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/innovation-models/transforming-maternal-health-tmah-model
