Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2025 Sep 9;23(9):e3003377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003377

Cathepsin Z is a conserved susceptibility factor underlying tuberculosis severity

Rachel K Meade 1,2,#, Oyindamola O Adefisayo 1,#, Marco T P Gontijo 1,#, Summer J Harris 1, Charlie J Pyle 1, Kaley M Wilburn 1, Alwyn M V Ecker 1, Erika J Hughes 1,2, Paloma D Garcia 1, Joshua Ivie 3, Michael L McHenry 4, Penelope H Benchek 4, Harriet Mayanja-Kizza 5, Jadee L Neff 6, Dennis C Ko 1,2, Jason E Stout 7, Catherine M Stein 4,8, Thomas R Hawn 3, David M Tobin 1,2,9, Clare M Smith 1,2,*
Editor: Maximiliano G Gutierrez10
PMCID: PMC12440229  PMID: 40924769

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) outcomes vary widely, from asymptomatic infection to mortality, yet most animal models do not recapitulate human phenotypic and genotypic variation. The genetically diverse Collaborative Cross mouse panel models distinct facets of TB disease that occur in humans and allows identification of genomic loci underlying clinical outcomes. We previously mapped a TB susceptibility locus on mouse chromosome 2. Here, we identify cathepsin Z (Ctsz) as a lead candidate underlying this TB susceptibility and show that Ctsz ablation leads to increased bacterial burden, pulmonary inflammation and decreased survival in mice. Ctsz disturbance within murine macrophages enhances production of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), a known biomarker of TB severity. From a Ugandan household contact study, we identify significant associations between CTSZ variants and TB disease severity. Finally, we examine patient-derived TB granulomas and report CTSZ localization within granuloma-associated macrophages, placing human CTSZ at the host–pathogen interface. These findings implicate a conserved CTSZ-CXCL1 axis in humans and genetically diverse mice that mediates TB disease severity.


Tuberculosis (TB) severity varies widely between people, is not well reflected in animal models of the disease, and is influenced by host factors. This study uses the Collaborative Cross mouse panel to identify the protease cathepsin Z (CTSZ) as a conserved regulator of TB outcomes via its influence on CXCL1 across genetically diverse mice and in humans.

Introduction

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), is a prolific obligate pathogen that has threatened human health for millennia [1]. Through centuries of coevolution, human hosts have developed a plethora of immunological mechanisms in response to Mtb infection [2]. Such host-bacterial interactions give rise to a spectrum of disease states, ranging from subclinical infection to fulminant disease [3]. The disease severity experienced by an individual is intricately connected to their genetic background. For example, monozygotic twins are at a demonstrably higher risk for TB concordance than dizygotic twins, highlighting shared genetic identity as a contributor to TB disease outcomes [46]. Human genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in impacted geographic regions have also identified polymorphisms that modulate host TB immunity [713], indicating numerous immunological pathways involved in Mtb susceptibility.

One such gene is cathepsin Z (CTSZ), which has been associated with TB susceptibility in independent human studies conducted across Africa. CTSZ encodes a lysosomal cysteine protease with a known structure and several reported cellular functions [1422]. The link between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CTSZ and human TB susceptibility was first established by sibling pair analysis in South African and Malawian populations and independent case-control studies in West Africa [23]. These findings were further validated in a South African case-control study [24] and in a Ugandan GWAS [25] and subsequent household contact study [26]. CTSZ is primarily expressed by monocytes and macrophages [2730] and participates in central immune functions, including dendritic cell maturation [31] and lymphocyte propagation and migration [32,33]. Although in vitro work has been undertaken to study the role of CTSZ in macrophage-driven protection against mycobacteria [34,35], CTSZ-linked TB susceptibility has not been explored in vivo. The functional role of CTSZ during Mtb infection remains unknown, despite growing genetic evidence of its association with TB disease outcomes.

Studying the mechanisms that underlie CTSZ-linked susceptibility in humans is complex [36]. Humans are outbred, and genetic studies of human cohorts must navigate the inherent challenges of natural genetic variation. Moreover, the low- and middle-income countries that harbor 80% of the global TB burden face challenges in and outside of the healthcare sector that complicate TB diagnosis, research, and treatment [37]. The connection between TB severity and host background is not uniquely human. In classic Mtb studies measuring postinfection survival, inbred mice have repeatedly illustrated the heritability of TB susceptibility [38,39]. Combining reproducibility with a limited range of genetic variation, classical inbred laboratory mice have served as tractable models that demonstrate the vital impact of host genetic background on Mtb pathogenesis. However, because inbred mice are nearly genetically identical within strain [40], studies leveraging standard inbred strains omit the contributions of natural host genetic diversity to TB pathogenesis. Recombinant inbred panels like the biparental BXD [4144] and octoparental Collaborative Cross (CC) [4547] systematically model host genetic variation, allowing insight into a spectrum of immune profiles without compromising the reproducibility of inbred strains [48]. We previously reported Mtb infection screens of BXD [49] and CC [50] recombinant inbred strains, leveraging these diverse mammalian panels to expand the range of known TB disease complexes and host-pathogen interactions modeled by mice. Using a quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping approach across a cohort of 52 CC genotypes, we identified a QTL on chromosome 2 (174.29–178.25Mb) significantly associated with Mtb burden. Genetic inheritance from NOD/ShiLtJ (NOD), a CC panel founder, at the Tuberculosis ImmunoPhenotype 5 (Tip5) QTL predicted elevated bacterial burden. CC strains that inherited the susceptible Tip5 variant (Tip5S) from NOD succumbed to severe TB prior to the study endpoint. We therefore sought to determine which genes found within the Tip5 interval could contribute to Mtb susceptibility in Tip5S CC strains.

Here, we show that CC strains harboring the Tip5S locus produce lower levels of CTSZ protein while exhibiting higher bacterial burden than B6 mice following aerosol infection, validating Tip5 as a susceptibility locus from the large-scale CC cohort screen. We report the first in vivo Mtb infections of mice lacking Ctsz (Ctsz−/−). We find that Ctsz ablation on a B6 background results in increased Mtb burden and an increased risk of mortality following infection. Moreover, Ctsz−/− mice overproduce CXCL1, a biomarker of active TB [51], at both acute and chronic timepoints. In Ctsz−/− bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), we find that CXCL1 is rapidly induced following mycobacterial infection. Leveraging published transcriptional data from genetically diverse mice, humans, macaques, and zebrafish, we find cathepsin Z expression is highest in macrophages following infection. We combine these findings with recent data from a Ugandan patient cohort, highlighting five variants in CTSZ as correlates of TB severity. Finally, we identify the presence of CTSZ in CD68+ macrophages within patient-derived pulmonary granulomas, revealing that CTSZ is produced at the host-pathogen interface in human lungs. Collectively, this work establishes genetic variation in cathepsin Z as a determinant of TB disease outcomes and places human CTSZ in a vital position within the pulmonary microenvironment to impact TB outcomes.

Results

Comparative transcriptional analysis to prioritize candidate genes within the Tip5 locus

We previously reported the Tip5 QTL (Chr2, 174.29–178.25Mb) as a TB susceptibility locus across the genetically diverse CC panel [50]. To identify gene candidates within Tip5, we leveraged published transcriptomic data from Mtb-infected mammalian lungs [52,53] (Fig 1A). Within the Tip5 interval, cathepsin Z (Ctsz; alternative names: cathepsin X, cathepsin P) and zinc finger protein 831 (Zfp831) were significantly induced in the lungs of genetically heterogeneous Diversity Outbred (DO) mice exhibiting progressive TB, characterized by elevated pulmonary Mtb burden and inflammation [52]. In rhesus macaques, animals with progressive TB disease produced significantly more CTSZ and ZNF831 (a high-confidence ortholog of Zfp831) transcript in their lungs [52]. In the blood of patients with active TB, CTSZ transcription was significantly elevated while ZNF831 transcription was significantly repressed [52,54]. In an additional lung transcriptomic study in inbred mice leveraging distinct Mtb strains and infectious doses, only 5 gene transcripts within Tip5, including Ctsz, were differentially regulated across all strains and doses [53]. Currently, there is no established association between human ZNF831 SNPs and TB outcomes. Conversely, mutations in human CTSZ were previously associated with poorer TB outcomes [23,24,26]. From this analysis, Ctsz was identified as a lead candidate for further interrogation as a potential genetic cause of Tip5-linked TB susceptibility.

Fig 1. Identification and validation of Ctsz as the lead candidate gene underlying Tip5.

Fig 1

(A) Heatmap representation of the per-gene outcome of four distinct criteria for genes within the Tip5 QTL (95% CI: 174.29–178.25Mb): (i) whether the gene transcript is significantly enriched in the lungs of genetically heterogeneous Diversity Outbred (DO) mice experiencing elevated burden and inflammation after Mtb infection [52], (ii) whether the gene transcript is significantly enriched in the lungs of rhesus macaques exhibiting clinical symptoms of severe TB disease [52], (iii) whether the gene is significantly up- or down-regulated in the blood of individuals with active TB [54], and (iv) whether the gene is differentially expressed in inbred mouse lungs across variable host genotypes, Mtb strains, and infectious doses [53]. To be included in the heatmap, genes were required to encode proteins and to contain a known SNP from the NOD inbred line [55]. Mouse chromosome 2 image generated in the R package karyoploteR. (B) CTSZ protein was measured from the lung homogenate of uninfected B6 and the Tip5S CC strains CC033 and CC038 (n = 3 mice per genotype). Each lane is a separate biological replicate. Vinculin served as the loading control. The assayed proteins are indicated by black arrows. Relative abundance of the (C) pro-CTSZ and (D) mature CTSZ protein between B6 and the Tip5S CC strains, quantified from Fig 1B by normalizing CTSZ levels for each biological replicate to its respective vinculin level. Values plotted as a percentage of the mean CTSZ to vinculin band intensity ratio relative to the average ratio for B6 mice. Hypothesis testing was performed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post hoc test on individual ratios between CTSZ and vinculin band intensities by genotype. (E) Bacterial burden measured from lung homogenate 4 weeks after aerosol infection with Mtb H37Rv (n = 3–12 mice per strain; all males except B6 and Ctsz−/− groups, which included both sexes in equal proportion). Hypothesis testing was performed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post hoc test on log10-transformed values. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheets 1C, 1D, and 1E.

The susceptible NOD variant of Tip5 and ablation of Ctsz both impart TB susceptibility

To evaluate Ctsz as a causal factor underlying Tip5-linked susceptibility, we measured CTSZ protein from the lungs of uninfected CC strains harboring the susceptible NOD Tip5 variant (CC033, CC038). Compared to Mtb-resistant B6, the lungs of both CC033 and CC038 exhibited significantly lower baseline levels of CTSZ protein (Fig 1B), both in the pro-form (Fig 1C) and mature active form (Fig 1D). Collectively, these data suggest that the NOD Tip5 haplotype contains a hypomorphic variant of Ctsz, resulting in reduced production of CTSZ protein in Tip5S CC strains.

Considering the Tip5 QTL was first identified in a large-scale in vivo screen, we next assessed whether Tip5S CC strains and Ctsz null mice (Ctsz−/−) (S1A Fig) are susceptible to aerosol infection, the natural route of Mtb infection. A cohort including B6, CC033, CC038, Ctsz−/−, and highly susceptible interferon gamma receptor null mice (Ifngr−/−) [56] was infected via aerosol route with Mtb H37Rv. The experiment terminated at 4 weeks postinfection, after the onset of adaptive immunity [57] and matching the initial CC screen endpoint [50]. Relative to B6, all infected strains exhibited significantly higher pulmonary Mtb burden (Fig 1E). The CC strains exhibited 10-fold greater lung CFU than B6, surpassing the canonically susceptible Ifngr−/− mice. Ctsz−/− mice exhibited a 2-fold increase in lung burden relative to B6. No significant differences were identified in disseminated spleen burden at this time point (S1B Fig). We conclude that Tip5S CC strains and Ctsz−/− mice exhibit reduced pulmonary bacterial control at 4 weeks postinfection.

Ctsz mediates lung CXCL1 levels early during Mtb infection

To characterize the impact of Ctsz on disease progression, we infected B6 and Ctsz−/− mice via aerosol, sacrificing cohorts of mice at 2, 3, 4, and 8 weeks postinfection to capture innate and adaptive immune responses. Ctsz−/− mice exhibited higher lung burden at 2 weeks (4.09 log10 CFU versus 3.41 in B6; p < 0.05) and 4 weeks (5.17 log10 CFU versus 4.09 in B6; p < 0.05) postinfection (Fig 2A). Similarly, at 3 weeks postinfection, Ctsz−/− mice exhibited trends toward elevated spleen burden (2.68 log10 CFU versus 2.17 in B6; p = 0.058), suggesting earlier dissemination and weaker bacterial containment in the lungs of Ctsz−/− mice (Fig 2B). However, by 4 weeks postinfection, spleen burden was indifferentiable between Ctsz−/− and B6.

Fig 2. Ctsz−/− mice have higher lung burden and earlier spleen dissemination during acute infection followed by greater chronic inflammation and mortality risk.

Fig 2

Mtb burden measured from (A) lung and (B) spleen homogenate by dilution plating. (C) Heatmap depicting scaled and centered phenotypes, hierarchically clustered and separated into 3 k clusters. (D) Individual mice plotted against the first two sPLS-DA components, which explained the greatest variance in the data after optimization. (E) Phenotype loadings contributing to component 1. Component 2 loadings shown in S2A Fig. (F) CXCL1 levels measured from lung homogenate by multiplex ELISA. For panels A, B, and F, hypothesis testing was performed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test on log10-transformed values. For panels A–F, mice were sacrificed at 2, 3, 4, and 8 weeks following aerosolized Mtb H37Rv infection. Data are from two independent experiments with n = 6–14 mice per genotype, representative of both sexes, at each time point. In panel C, age-matched, uninfected mice (n = 3–4 per genotype and sex) were assayed for comparison (designated “W0”). (G) Kaplan–Meier survival estimates of aerosol-infected B6 (n = 23) and Ctsz−/− mice (n = 62) across two independent experiments. Hypothesis testing was performed using a log-rank test. Equal proportions of both sexes were included. Mice that were not moribund at time of sacrifice were censored for analysis. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheets 2ABCDEF_S2A and 2G_S2BC.

To profile the impact of Ctsz disturbance on the lung inflammatory response throughout the course of infection, we compared cytokine signatures of Ctsz−/− with B6 at assayed timepoints. At 4 weeks postinfection, Ctsz−/− mice exhibited higher concentrations of TH1-associated cytokines, like TNF-α (p = 0.019) and IL-1β (p = 0.016), and lower levels of GM-CSF (p = 3.8e−06), IL-6 (p = 5.9e−04), LIF (p = 6.6e−07), and VEGF (p = 6.6e−07) compared to B6 (Fig 2C).

To identify unique features in the inflammatory signature of Ctsz−/− mice, we performed sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) across measured phenotypes (Fig 2D). Higher lung burden and CXCL1 levels in Ctsz−/− mice were the strongest features underlying sparse component 1 (Fig 2E). Although component 1 explains 19% of variance in the data compared to 23% variance explained by component 2 (S2A Fig), component 1 better captures the variance attributable to genotype. CXCL1 has previously been identified as a biomarker of active TB disease in genetically diverse mice [51] and in humans [58]. From 2 to 4 weeks postinfection, Ctsz−/− mice exhibited significantly higher lung CXCL1 levels (Fig 2F), suggesting that Ctsz ablation increases disease severity. However, by 8 weeks postinfection, although mean CXCL1 levels in Ctsz−/− lungs were elevated, the difference was no longer significant. Enhanced production of CXCL1 was consistent throughout infection, suggesting that this effect may occur independent of differences in Mtb burden.

To explore the possibility that elevated CXCL1 levels may occur independent of infection in Ctsz−/− mice, we sacrificed uninfected mice of both sexes. From lung homogenate, we found elevated levels of CXCL1 in Ctsz−/− compared to B6 (Fig 2C; p = 0.007), suggesting that the connection between Ctsz and CXCL1 extends beyond the context of infection. Notably, the total CXCL1 levels in uninfected mice were comparable to levels measured at 2 weeks postinfection.

To determine whether Ctsz ablation alone is sufficient to confer susceptibility to aerosolized Mtb H37Rv, we conducted two longitudinal challenges of B6 and Ctsz−/− mice in which mice were sacrificed when IACUC-approved humane endpoints were reached. Ctsz ablation was associated with a significant reduction in survival time (Fig 2G), which was driven by male mice (S2B and S2C Fig). Thus, disease progression in a host lacking Ctsz is characterized by increased lung Mtb burden, elevated lung CXCL1 levels indicative of heightened inflammation, and overall mortality risk.

Disturbance of Ctsz enhances CXCL1 induction in macrophages

To explore the expression of cathepsin Z across species and mycobacterial infection models, we analyzed two previously published single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) datasets. In zebrafish infected with Mycobacterium marinum (Mm), ctsz was most highly expressed in inflammatory macrophages (cluster 9) after 14 days of infection (Fig 3A3C) [59]. CTSZ in cynomolgus macaques was most highly expressed in macrophages 4 weeks after Mtb infection compared to other assayed cell types (Fig 3D3F) [60]. These results agree with literature establishing the presence of CTSZ in monocytes and macrophages [2730] and further highlight that cathepsin Z expression in these cell types following mycobacterial infection is conserved across diverse host species.

Fig 3. Cathepsin Z is highly expressed in macrophages across species following mycobacterial infection and mediates levels of CXCL1 in murine macrophages.

Fig 3

(A) UMAP showing scRNA-Seq results from zebrafish granulomas infected with M. marinum (Mm), generated by reanalysis of previously published data from by Cronan and colleagues [59]. Cells are colored by cluster and assigned in an unsupervised approach from transcriptional signatures. Clusters were annotated by the authors. (B) ScRNA-Seq data colored by relative expression of zebrafish ctsz in Mm-infected granulomas, with highest expression levels observed in cluster 9. (C) Violin plots depicting the relative ctsz expression by cell cluster, with fill colors and cluster labels aligned with panel A. (D) UMAP showing scRNA-Seq of granulomas extracted from Mtb-infected cynomolgus macaques at 4 weeks postinfection, published by Gideon and colleagues, 2022 [60]. Data accessed at the Broad Institute Single Cell online repository on October 3, 2023 (https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell/study/SCP1749/). (E) ScRNA-Seq data colored by relative expression of CTSZ in Mtb-infected macaque granulomas. (F) Violin plots depicting the relative CTSZ expression by cell type, with fill colors and cell type labels aligned with panel D. CXCL1 levels measured in triplicate at 24 h postinfection from (G) BCG-infected and (H) Mtb-infected BMDMs by ELISA. For panels G and H, BMDMs were differentiated from independent pairs of Ctsz+/+ and Ctsz−/− sibling males for each infection (N= 3 infections per pathogen). Dashed threshold denotes the limit of detection for the ELISA. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test on batch-corrected, log10-transformed values. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheets 3G and 3H. Data from Cronan and colleagues (2021) and Gideon and colleagues (2022) are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession numbers GSE161712 and GSE200151, respectively.

As cathepsin Z is consistently expressed in macrophages across several species following mycobacterial infection, we sought to characterize the impact of Ctsz ablation on the initial macrophage response to mycobacterial exposure. To test if macrophages contribute to the increased production of CXCL1 during infection in Ctsz−/− mice, we generated BMDMs from Ctsz+/+ and Ctsz−/− sibling pairs. When infected with either nonpathogenic Mycobacterium bovis (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; BCG) (Fig 3G) or Mtb (Fig 3H), Ctsz−/− macrophages produced greater amounts of CXCL1 than Ctsz+/+ by 24 h postinfection. In both infection models, this effect scaled with increasing multiplicity of infection (MOI). Thus, the elevated CXCL1 we observed in Ctsz−/− lungs may be driven by macrophages, especially during the early stages of infection, and appears to be independent of mycobacterial pathogenicity. These results from Mtb-infected Ctsz−/− mice and BMDMs suggest an interaction between CTSZ and CXCL1 following bacterial exposure.

Variants in human CTSZ are associated with TB severity

To investigate the impact of natural CTSZ variation on human TB disease outcomes, we examined whether human CTSZ variants are associated with TB disease severity in a household contact study in Uganda (n = 328 across two independent cohorts) [61]. Of 81 observed CTSZ SNPs, 20 SNPs were associated with differences in Bandim TBScore, a TB severity index (S1 Table; unadjusted p < 0.05, linear model with sex, HIV status, and genotypic principal components 1 and 2 as covariates) [62]. After performing a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, 4 SNPs and 1 INDEL maintained associations with TB disease severity (Table 1). These variants are in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with one another (R2 > 0.8), suggesting that they represent a single haplotype block (Fig 4A). For the most significant SNP (rs113592645), the minor T allele is associated with decreased TB disease severity between those with homozygous major C allele and heterozygotes (Fig 4B, results for other haplotype SNPs included in S3A3C Fig). To investigate the potential impact of the TB severity SNPs on CTSZ expression, we used published RNA-Seq data [63] to compare CTSZ transcript levels across Mtb- and mock-infected monocytes between genotypes at each CTSZ SNP. In the cohort of human-derived monocytes, CTSZ was highly expressed at baseline and was downregulated following Mtb infection (Fig 4C). Conversely, the rs113592645 minor T allele was associated with increased CTSZ expression following Mtb infection (p = 0.0395; Fig 4D; other haplotype SNP results in S3D3F Fig). This effect was not observed following mock infection conditions (p = 0.108; Fig 4D). Together, these data suggest that these CTSZ variants are associated with both TB disease severity and divergent transcription of CTSZ following Mtb infection.

Table 1. CTSZ SNPs significantly associated with TB severity in Ugandan household contact study cohorts, sorted by ascending p-value.

Included SNPs were significantly associated with Bandim TBScore after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (p< 0.05). Complete collection of 81 SNPs can be found in S1 Table. SNPs are annotated as described in McHenry and colleagues [61]. Allele effects were assessed using a linear mixed effect model in the R package kimma to account for sex, HIV status, and genotypic principal components 1 and 2. Cohorts 1 and 2 are independent cohorts of culture-confirmed adult TB cases. Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; CHR, chromosome; BP, base pair from GRCh38 build; Adj., adjusted; MAF, minor allele frequency.

SNP CHR:BP Effect Allele Adj.
p-value
β MAF in Cohort 1
(n = 149)
MAF in Cohort 2
(n = 179)
rs113592645 20:59001340 T 0.0001814 −1.0036 0.18 0.061
rs111630627 20:59002589 G 0.0003077 −0.9268 0.18 0.075
rs138964736 20:59002671 ACTTTG 0.0003077 −0.9268 0.18 0.075
rs76687632 20:59002905 G 0.0003077 −0.9268 0.18 0.075
rs8120779 20:59001977 G 0.0003942 −0.8671 0.18 0.095

Fig 4. Human CTSZ variants are associated with TB severity, and CTSZ is present at the host-pathogen interface within human pulmonary Mtb granulomas.

Fig 4

(A) LD plot of human CTSZ, highlighting a haplotype block of 4 identified SNPs and 1 INDEL associated with TB disease severity. (B) Comparison of TB severity, measured using Bandim TBScore, by genotype for the lead TB severity SNP, rs113592645. TB severity score by genotype for remaining SNPs can be found in S3A3C Fig. For panels C and D, CTSZ expression was profiled by RNA-Seq in monocytes from 100 Ugandan individuals. Human-derived monocytes were subjected to 6-hour Mtb and mock infection conditions. (C) Counts of CTSZ transcript (log2 counts per million) collected following mock and Mtb infection. (D) Counts of CTSZ transcript (log2 counts per million) according to genotype for the lead TB severity SNP, rs113592645, following mock and Mtb infection. Measurements for homozygous minor allele (TT) were excluded due to low sample size. Counts of CTSZ transcript by genotype of remaining SNPs can be found in S3D3F Fig. (E) A manually annotated UMAP generated by unsupervised clustering of data from single-cell mRNA-Seq of human biopsy tissue, containing Mtb granulomas from three patients with TB. (F, G) Analysis of normalized expression values reveals that CTSZ is specifically induced in granuloma macrophages, particularly in lipid-associated macrophages. Values of tau near 1 indicate that CTSZ expression is highly specific to some clusters, whereas values near 0 indicate uniform expression across clusters [64]. This expression pattern is part of a broader induction of multiple cathepsins in human Mtb granuloma macrophages, shown in S4A Fig. (H) The positional distribution of CTSZ expression in human Mtb granulomas as determined by Visium v2 spatial mRNA-Seq of Eosin-stained biopsy tissue sections from a patient with TB. Similarly processed pulmonary and pleural biopsies from two additional patients with TB can be found in S4B Fig. Panels E–H were generated by reanalysis of data from Pyle and colleagues, 2025 [65]. Cell clusters were annotated by the authors. (I) Brightfield (BF) images and immunofluorescent staining of CTSZ and CD68 within a granuloma biopsy from an individual with pulmonary TB. Goat (Gt) and mouse (Ms) IgG isotype control staining is depicted in the top row. DAPI staining indicates cell nuclei. Scale bar is 60 µM in length. Images were captured at 100× magnification. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheet 4CD_S3DEF. Data from Pyle and colleagues (2025) are available in the NCBI GEO under accession numbers GSE296399 and GSE296400.

CTSZ is produced in macrophages associated with human pulmonary granulomas

The mycobacterial granuloma is an organized structure that can develop within human hosts to contain and restrict Mtb infection and is composed of heterogeneous immune cell populations, predominantly macrophages [66]. To investigate whether CTSZ expression in macrophages is conserved between mice and humans, we reanalyzed published, spatially resolved scRNA-Seq data from human Mtb granulomas [65]. In pulmonary granulomas biopsied from three patients with TB, CTSZ was highly upregulated in macrophage cell clusters (Fig 4E4G). Within patient-derived pulmonary granuloma sections, areas of elevated CTSZ expression were found to coincide with regions dominated by macrophages (Fig 4H). In addition to CTSZ, several other cathepsins were also found to be induced in human Mtb granuloma macrophages (S4 Fig). To confirm whether elevated CTSZ transcription corresponded with elevated CTSZ protein levels in patient tissue samples, we performed immunostaining on granulomas biopsied from the lungs of patients with culture-confirmed TB. We positively identified CTSZ within granuloma-associated CD68+ macrophages from Mtb-infected lung tissue (Fig 4I). Thus, CTSZ is produced at the site of host-pathogen interaction in humans, suggesting that native functions at this interface could be interrupted should CTSZ production or localization be impeded. Combined with the results from Ctsz null mice, these data suggest that balancing cathepsin Z levels is required to regulate lung inflammation and reduce risk of mortality following Mtb infection. Collectively, these data establish an association between human CTSZ variants and TB disease severity and reveal CTSZ as a granuloma macrophage-associated protein in human lungs.

Discussion

Over 15 years have passed since the initial discovery that human CTSZ is linked with TB disease susceptibility in West and South Africa. However, the relationship between Mtb susceptibility and CTSZ had yet to be experimentally determined. We show that genetic interruption of Ctsz in mice causes a failure of bacterial restriction and overproduction of CXCL1 during early Mtb infection, precipitating an increased risk of mortality. We further show that ablation of Ctsz is associated with cell-autonomous overproduction of CXCL1 in macrophages following Mtb infection. We report 4 SNPs and 1 INDEL within CTSZ significantly associated with TB severity in Ugandan individuals and show elevated CTSZ expression in infected monocytes from this cohort. Finally, we find that CTSZ protein is produced within the CD68+ macrophages in human granulomas, the pulmonary structure that contains and restricts Mtb growth.

CTSZ participates in several known immunological pathways [29,32,33,67]. For example, CTSZ is known to interact with cell surface integrins that mediate immune cell activity, including lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) [32,33] and macrophage-1 antigen (Mac-1) [67], which regulates Mtb phagocytosis [68] and phagocyte migration. Here, we show that lung CXCL1 levels are consistently elevated in Ctsz−/− mice prior to and throughout infection. Moreover, compared to wildtype siblings, Ctsz−/− macrophages produce more CXCL1 in response to pathogenic and nonpathogenic mycobacterial infection, suggesting a broad immunological response to bacterial exposure.

CXCL1, a cytokine associated with severe TB disease in mice [51] and in humans [58], is primarily known as a neutrophil chemoattractant [69]. Both Ctsz and Cxcl1 are induced in Mtb-infected mice [70]. We are not the first to show a significant increase in CXCL1 levels following pathogenic infection in Ctsz−/− mice [71], but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to directly link CTSZ and CXCL1 during TB pathogenesis. In a 2022 study, mice with neutrophil-specific ablation of the Mac-1 subunit integrin β2 (CD18) were infected with Aspergillus fumigatus, a fungus that is recognized by the immune system through Mac-1 [72]. By 24 h postinfection, Haist and colleagues observed elevated fungal burden and elevated CXCL1 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Similarly, we have observed high Mtb burden and CXCL1 in Ctsz−/− lungs following Mtb infection. These results collectively suggest that disturbance of normal CD18 activity, which is known to rely upon Ctsz [32,33,67,73,74], may trigger overproduction of CXCL1. Future studies are needed to delineate the implications of this CTSZ-CXCL1 axis with other known roles of CTSZ, including cellular adhesion, migration, and antigen presentation [29].

A deeper understanding of how the functions of CTSZ impact disease severity could prove vital to developing therapeutic strategies for both endogenous and infectious diseases. Men are 1.7-fold more likely to develop active TB than women [75]. Considering the sexually dimorphic mortality risk observed in Ctsz−/− mice and a previous study reporting that B6 BMDM inflammatory responses are divergent between sexes [76], further study of the sex-specific effects of CTSZ may yield insights into the biology underpinning this imbalance in humans. Beyond TB, CTSZ has been implicated as a mediator of host response during Helicobacter pylori infections of patient-derived monocytes and Salmonella Typhimurium infections of murine BMDMs [77,78]. Furthermore, mouse and human studies have investigated CTSZ for roles in aging [79,80] and in a number of endogenous conditions, including multiple sclerosis [81], primary biliary cholangitis [82,83], osteoporosis [84], and Alzheimer’s [85]. CTSZ has also been explored for prognostic value and roles in tumor progression across many cancers [86], including breast [87], colorectal [88], gastric [77], and prostate cancers [89], and hepatocellular carcinoma [90]. Increased CTSZ expression was associated with poor patient prognoses in two studies [88,90], with one study proposing CTSZ as a putative oncogene [90]. Given the importance of CTSZ across a spectrum of human disease categories, continued study of CTSZ may yield insights on the human response to departures from immune homeostasis.

While much remains unknown about the molecular roles of CTSZ during Mtb infection, this study is the first, to our knowledge, to identify cathepsin Z as a molecular determinant of TB severity in mice and humans. This study is also the first to report CTSZ localization within granuloma-associated CD68+ macrophages in Mtb-infected human lungs. Host genetic diversity is a central predictor of TB severity, and consideration of genetic diversity is essential to combat human pathogens as enduring and prolific as Mtb.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the guidelines issued in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. Mouse studies were conducted at Duke University using protocols approved by the Duke Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (Animal Welfare Assurance #A221-20-11 and #A204-23-10) in a manner designed to minimize pain and suffering in Mtb-infected animals. Any animal exhibiting signs of severe disease was immediately euthanized in accordance with IACUC-approved endpoints. Use of patient samples was approved by the Duke University Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB) under Protocol #00107795 and the University of Washington IRB under Protocol STUDY00001537. Patient sample processing at Duke University was carried out by Drs. Jadee Neff, Charlie Pyle, and Jason Stout. The human genetic data were obtained from the Kawempe Community Health Study in Uganda, which was approved by the National HIV/AIDS Research Committee of Makerere University (Protocol #014) and the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center IRB (Protocol #10-01-25). Final clearance was given by the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (Ref #658).

Mice

Male and female C57BL/6J (#000664) and male B6.129S7-Ifngr1tm1Agt/J (Ifngr−/−; #003288) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Male CC033/GeniUncJ (CC033) and CC038/GeniUnc (CC038) mice were purchased from the University of North Carolina (UNC) Systems Genetics Core Facility (SGCF). Ctsz−/− mice were generously provided by Robin Yates (University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada) and generated as previously described [91]. Ctsz+/+ and Ctsz−/− mice were subsequently bred at Duke, using Ctsz+/− breeding pairs to enable generation of sex-matched Ctsz+/+ and Ctsz−/− siblings. All mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility within standardized living conditions (12-h light/dark, food, and water ad libitum). Aerosol-infected mice were matched at 8–12 weeks of age at the time of Mtb infection. Mice were individually identified for weighing and wellness assessment throughout infection using Bio Medic Data Systems implantable electronic ID transponders (TP-1000) implanted subcutaneously at the back of the neck prior to infection.

Genotyping

In-house confirmation of Ctsz−/− genotype was performed using forward primer 5′-TTG CTG TTG GCG AGT GCG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CTT GTC ACC AGA TTC CAG C-3′ to detect wildtype Ctsz and forward primer 5′-GCT ACC TGC CCA TTC GAC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-ACA GTA GGA CTG GCC AGC-3′ to detect knockout product. Primer sequences were generously provided by Robin Yates (University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada). DNA was extracted from tissue samples using the DNEasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). DNA products were prepared for PCR using Q5 High-Fidelity Master Mix (New England BioLabs) and amplified. Protocol included initial 98 °C (30s), then 34 cycles of denaturation (98 °C, 10 s), annealing (68 °C, 30 s), and extension (72 °C, 90 s), and a final 72 °C (180 s), resting at 10 °C ∞ until stopped. Amplified products were separated on a 1% agarose-TAE gel using SYBR Safe stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1kb Plus DNA Ladder (New England BioLabs). Ctsz+/+ and Ctsz−/− mice were genotyped at the time of weaning from ear and tail tissue biopsies by TransnetYX (Cordova, TN, USA) using proprietary RT-PCR primers designed to detect both lacZ, present in the IRES vector disturbing the second exon of Ctsz [91], and wildtype Ctsz.

Bacterial strains and culture

All infections were performed with either Mtb H37Rv genotype or M. bovis BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin) Danish (gift from Sunhee Lee, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA), which was transformed with pTEC-15 wasabi fluor and possesses a hygromycin resistance marker for selection [92]. Aerosol infections were performed using an Mtb H37Rv strain confirmed to be positive for the cell wall lipid and virulence factor phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM; gift from Kyu Y. Rhee, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA). Bacteria were cultured in Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with oleic acid-albumin-dextrose catalase (OADC), 0.2% glycerol, and 0.05% Tween 80 (or 0.005% tyloxapol for macrophage infections) to log-phase with shaking (200 rpm) at 37 °C. Hygromycin (50µg/mL) was added when necessary. Prior to all in vivo infections, cultures were washed and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween 80 (hereafter PBS-T). Bacterial aggregates were then broken into single cells using a blunt needle before diluting to desired concentration for infection.

Mouse infections

Mice were infected with ~150−350 Mtb CFU via aerosol inhalation (Glas-Col). On the day following each infection, one cage was sacrificed to enumerate lung CFU as an approximation of infectious dose. For all infections, mice were euthanized in accordance with approved IACUC protocols, and lung and spleen were harvested into PBS-T and processed in a FastPrep-24 Homogenizer (MP Biomedicals, 4.0 m/s, 45 s, 2–3×). Mtb burden was quantified by dilution plating onto Middlebrook 7H10 agar supplemented with OADC, 0.2% glycerol, 50 µg/mL Carbenicillin, 10 µg/mL Amphotericin B, 25 µg/mL Polymyxin B, and 20 µg/mL Trimethoprim. Lung homogenate was centrifuged through a 0.2 µm filter to collect decontaminated filtrate, and cytokines and chemokines were assayed using the pro-inflammatory focused 32-plex assay (Eve Technologies, Calgary, AB, Canada).

Human tissue immunofluorescent staining

Patient tissue samples containing Mtb granulomas were identified at the Duke University School of Medicine. Clinical tissue specimens were obtained from the Duke Pathology Department, and 5 µm paraffin sections for antibody staining were cut by the Research Histology Laboratory within the BioRepository & Precision Pathology Center (BRPC). Paraffin was dissolved using two xylene washes followed by washes with ethanol of increasing dilution (100% twice, 95% twice, 70% once, and 50% once), three washes with deionized water, and a final wash in PBS. Sample was placed in antigen retrieval buffer (10 mM Tris/1 mM EDTA, pH 9.0) and processed in a pressure cooker for 10 min. Following a cooling step, samples were blocked for an hour in 2.5% normal donkey serum. Samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with Goat anti-Human/Mouse/Rat Cathepsin X/Z/P Polyclonal Antibody (R&D Systems, AF934, 0.185 mg/mL) and Mouse anti-Human CD68 Monoclonal Antibody (Agilent Dako, M081401-2, 0.185 mg/mL) in 2.5% serum in a humidified chamber. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype controls for background staining (Goat: Biotechne, AB-108-C, 1 mg/mL stock; Mouse:GenScript, A01007, 1 mg/mL stock; Rabbit: Invitrogen, 10500C, 3 mg/mL provided) were also used. Primary antibody was removed with three washes of PBS and two of deionized water. Samples were incubated in Alexa Fluor (AF) conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:500; Donkey anti-Goat IgG AF Plus 647:A32849; Donkey anti-Mouse IgG AF 488:A-21202; Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG AF 555:A-31572) in 2.5% serum for 1–3 h. Following three PBS washes, the samples were mounted for imaging in DAPI Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech, 0100-20) on glass slides (Fisher Scientific, 22-035813). All antibodies used for staining were centrifuged at 10,000 RCF (4 °C) for 10 min to remove antibody precipitate prior to use.

Microscopy analysis

Human samples were imaged at 100× on a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 inverted microscope with an X-Light V2 spinning disk confocal imaging system (Biovision). Images were processed identically within Fiji software (v2.14.0/1.54f) for image clarity.

Bone marrow-derived macrophage infections

Ctsz+/+ and Ctsz−/− sibling pairs were sacrificed in accordance with approved IACUC protocols between 10 and 12 weeks of age. For BCG infections, bone marrow was flushed from hip and leg bones with DMEM (Corning) and cultured for a week at 37 °C in a sterile solution of DMEM with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Corning), 18% 3T3-derived M-CSF, 1× Pen/Strep (Corning), and 25 mM HEPES (gibco). For Mtb infections, bone marrow was flushed from hip and leg bones with sterile DMEM (Corning) and frozen in 10% DMSO in heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Corning). Aliquots were later thawed and cultured for a week at 37 °C in a sterile solution of DMEM with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Corning), 30 µg/mL recombinant M-CSF (PeproTech), 1X Pen/Strep (Corning), and 25 mM HEPES (gibco). Differentiated macrophages were then plated at a concentration of 3 × 105 cells/well in a 24-well plate and cultured at 37 °C overnight in a DMEM solution as above but without Pen/Strep. BMDMs were infected with BCG or transported to BSL-3 biocontainment for infection with Mtb at MOI 3 or 7 or left uninfected. Wells were tested for even infection by CFU plating. At 24 h postinfection, supernatants were collected and filtered using a 0.2 µm filter to remove bacteria. Cytokines and chemokines were assayed from using the high-sensitivity 18-plex discovery assay (Eve Technologies, Calgary, AB, Canada).

Western blotting

For the comparison of mouse CTSZ between uninfected B6 mice and Tip5S CC strains (CC033 and CC038), whole lungs were collected from male mice (8 weeks of age) into 1 mL of Trizol reagent. Samples were homogenized with sterile beads at 4.5 m/s for 30 s using the FastPrep-24 Homogenizer (MP Biomedicals). For samples in Trizol, protein was precipitated for 15 min using 9 volumes of 100% methanol at room temperature. The protein precipitate was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 min, dried for 5 min, and washed in an equal volume of 90% methanol. The protein precipitates were then centrifuged for 1 min at 3,000 rpm, dried for 10 min, resuspended in 1 mL of RIPA buffer and 1× Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, and heated for 5–10 min at 95 °C. Equal volumes of each sample were combined with Laemmli Sample Buffer (BioRad) and 2-Mercaptoethanol (BioRad) and heated at 95 °C for 5 min. SDS-PAGE was performed using BioRad Western Blotting kit along with Precision Plus Protein All Blue Prestained Protein Standards (BioRad). Protein was separated using a 4%–20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Protein Gel (BioRad) and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane using a semi-dry transfer protocol on a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (BioRad). Membrane was blocked using EveryBlot Blocking Buffer (BioRad). Primary staining was performed at 4 °C overnight using Human/Mouse/Rat Cathepsin X/Z/P Antibody (R&D Systems; AF934; 1:2,000 dilution in EveryBlot Blocking Buffer). For B6 and Tip5S CC mice, 0.1% Tween 20 was added to the blocking buffer and primary staining also included Vinculin (E1E9V) XP Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling; #13901; 1:5,000 dilution in EveryBlot Blocking Buffer + 0.1% Tween 20). For Ctsz+/+ and Ctsz−/− mice, secondary staining was performed at room temperature for 60 min using Donkey anti-Goat 680 (LI-COR; 1:20,000 dilution in EveryBlot Blocking Buffer + 0.1% SDS). Blot was washed in TBS-T between blocking and antibody stains, and fluorescence was measured using a LI-COR Odyssey. Secondary staining for B6 and Tip5S CC mice was performed at room temperature for 60 min using HRP-conjugated Rabbit Anti-Goat IgG (Proteintech; SA00001-4; 1:5,000 dilution in EveryBlot Blocking Buffer + 0.1% Tween 20) and HRP-conjugated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (Proteintech; SA00001-2; 1:5,000 dilution in EveryBlot Blocking Buffer + 0.1% Tween 20). Blot was washed in PBS-T (0.1% Tween 20). Chemiluminescence was developed using SuperSignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and imaged using a ChemiDoc Plus Imaging System (BioRad). Quantification of the blot was performed with ImageLab software (version 6.1).

Human CTSZ analysis

We queried the summary statistics from a published genome-wide association study (GWAS) of TB severity in cases from Kampala, Uganda [61]. Briefly, two independent cohorts of culture-confirmed adult TB cases (n = 149, n = 179) [93] were included in a GWAS. TB severity was quantified using the Bandim TBscore, which enumerates TB symptoms (e.g., cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea) and clinical signs (e.g., anemia, low body mass index, high body temperature) [62,94]. SNPs within CTSZ were identified using a 5kb flanking region around the CTSZ start and end positions reported in Ensembl (GRCh38). Pairwise LD for these SNPs was evaluated as the squared inter-variant allele count correlations (R2) using PLINK (version 1.90) in the larger of the two cohorts (n = 179). An LD plot was generated from these pairwise LD measures using the R package LDheatmap (version 1.0-5) [95]. The model used to estimate allele effects accounted for sex, HIV status, RNA-Seq batch, and genotypic principal components 1 and 2.

SNP eQTL assessment was performed for the four significant SNPs indicated in Table 1. A linear mixed effect model was developed in the R package kimma [96] to compare baseline, media, and Mtb-induced CTSZ expression against each SNP genotype. The eQTL model accounted for sex, HIV status, RNA-Seq batch, and genotypic principal components 1 and 2. CTSZ expression as log2 (counts per million) was obtained from RNA-Seq data normalized using voom [97]. RNA-Seq data used for these analyses originated from a previously published dataset of CD14+ monocytes isolated from individuals within the Uganda cohort [63]. Monocytes were subjected to 6-hour media or Mtb stimulation and transcriptionally assayed.

Statistical analysis and data visualization

Hypothesis testing was performed using R statistical software (version 4.3.1). Statistical tests used for hypothesis testing are noted in the figure legends. Shapiro–Wilks tests were used to assess normality in phenotype data prior to parametric hypothesis testing, and log10-transformation was applied for normalization where appropriate. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated using the R package survminer (version 0.5.0). A visualization of mouse chromosome 2 was generated using the R package karyoploteR (version 1.16.0) from the GRCm38/mm10 mouse genome build. Heatmaps in Figs 1A and 2C were generated using the R packages ComplexHeatmap (version 2.21.2) and heatmaply (version 1.5.0), respectively. Optimization and sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) on time course infection cohorts were performed on time point data using the R package mixOmics (version 6.24.0).

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Genetic validation and infection of Ctsz−/− mice.

(A) Expression of wildtype and truncated Ctsz in tail sections from B6, Ctsz+/−, and Ctsz−/− mice. Approximate sizes of wildtype and truncated PCR products are indicated by black arrows. As previously described by Sevenich and colleagues, 2010 [91], exon 2 (containing the active site cysteine critical for the enzymatic activity of Ctsz), and a portion of intron 3 in Ctsz were deleted by homologous recombination and substituted by a cassette comprising an independent ribosomal entry sequence (IRES). External confirmation of these results was obtained by probing the lacZ reporter gene present in the inserted IRES vector. (B) Bacterial burden measured by dilution plating from spleen homogenate 4 weeks after aerosol infection with Mtb H37Rv (n = 3–12 per strain; all males except B6 and Ctsz−/− groups, which included both sexes in equal proportion). Hypothesis testing was performed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post hoc test on log10-transformed values. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheet S1B.

(PDF)

pbio.3003377.s001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)
S2 Fig. sPLS-DA and survival analysis comparing Ctsz/ and B6 mice.

(A) Phenotype loadings contributing to sparse component 2. Mice were sacrificed at 2, 3, 4, and 8 weeks after aerosolized Mtb infection. Data are from two experiments with n = 6–14 mice per genotype, representative of both sexes, at each time point. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates of aerosol-infected B6 (n = 23) and Ctsz−/− mice (n = 62) across two independent experiments, among (B) male and (C) female mice. Hypothesis testing was performed using a log-rank test. Equal proportions of both sexes were included. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheets 2ABCDEF_S2A and 2G_S2BC.

(PDF)

pbio.3003377.s002.pdf (706.1KB, pdf)
S3 Fig. Minor alleles of CTSZ SNPs within the TB severity haplotype block are associated with lower TB severity score and significantly greater CTSZ expression.

Comparison of TB severity, measured using Bandim TBScore, by genotype for (A) rs111630627, (B) rs8120779, and (C) rs76687632 SNPs. Expression of each allele of each SNP was assessed by RNA-Seq at 6 h after mock and Mtb infection in human-derived monocytes. CTSZ expression by monocytes harboring the minor allele for each SNP was significantly increased following both infection conditions for the (D) rs111630627, (E) rs8120779, and (F) rs76687632 SNPs. eQTL effects were assessed with a linear mixed effect model in kimma to account for sex, age, RNA-Seq batch, genotypic principal components 1 and 2, and kinship. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheet 4CD_S3DEF.

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Cathepsin mRNA is highly expressed in human Mtb granuloma macrophages.

(A) Heatmap depicting mRNA expression levels of several cathepsins and macrophage markers across unsupervised scRNA-Seq cell clusters. (B) The positional distribution of CTSZ expression in human Mtb granulomas as determined by Visium v2 spatial mRNA-Seq of Eosin-stained biopsy tissue sections from two patients with TB. This figure was generated by re-analysis of previously published data from Pyle and colleagues, 2025 [65]. Cell clusters were annotated by the authors. Data from Pyle and colleagues, 2025 are available in the NCBI GEO under accession numbers GSE296399 and GSE296400.

(PDF)

pbio.3003377.s004.pdf (27.9MB, pdf)
S1 File. Fig 1B raw image.

(TIF)

pbio.3003377.s005.tif (15.2MB, tif)
S2 File. S1A Fig raw image.

(PNG)

pbio.3003377.s006.png (2.3MB, png)
S1 Data

Source data for main and supporting figures.

(XLSX)

pbio.3003377.s007.xlsx (187.3KB, xlsx)
S1 Raw images

Annotated raw images for Fig 1B and S1A Fig.

(PDF)

pbio.3003377.s008.pdf (16.9MB, pdf)
S1 Table. Complete list of 81 CTSZ SNPs present in Ugandan household contact study cohorts and their associations with TB severity.

TB severity was evaluated by Bandim TBScore. Summary statistics for the CTSZ variants shown are based on a meta-analysis of two independent cohorts of culture-confirmed adult TB cases (described in McHenry and colleagues, 2023 [61]). Each cohort utilized a linear regression model that controlled for HIV status, sex, and one principal component. Unadjusted p-values are reported. Abbreviations: CHR, chromosome; BP, base pair from GRCh38 build; MAF, minor allele frequency.

(XLSX)

pbio.3003377.s009.xlsx (15.4KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge members of the Smith and Tobin Labs for technical expertise; Martin Ferris, Rachel Lynch, and Ginger Shaw for coordination of experimental cohorts of CC mice through the UNC Systems Genetics Core Facility (SGCF); Christopher Sassetti, Douglas Marchuk, and Craig Lowe for thoughtful critiques and suggestions; and the staff of the Regional Biosafety Laboratory at Duke University for ongoing support of personnel safety in BSL-3 biocontainment. We acknowledge the staff of the Duke University BioRepository and Precision Pathology Center (BRPC) for identifying the human clinical cases and collecting and preparing the paraffin tissue sections. The authors also acknowledge the vital contribution of the patients whose samples provided data for this paper and the contributions made by senior physicians, medical officers, health visitors, laboratory personnel, and data personnel working with the Uganda-CWRU Research Collaboration. This study would not be possible without the generous participation of Ugandan patients and families.

Abbreviations

AF

Alexa Fluor

BCG

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin;

BF

brightfield;

BMDMs

bone marrow-derived macrophages

BP

base pair;

BRPC

BioRepository and Precision Pathology Center;

CFAR

Center for AIDS Research

Chr

chromosome;

Ctsz

cathepsin Z

DAC

Data Access Committee

DO

Diversity Outbred

GEO

Gene Expression Omnibus

GWAS

genome-wide association studies

IACUC

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

IgG

immunoglobulin; G

IRB

Institutional Review Board

IRES

independent ribosomal entry sequence

LD

linkage disequilibrium

LFA-1

lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1;

Mac-1

macrophage-1 antigen;

MAF

minor allele frequency;

Mm

Mycobacterium marinum;

MOI

multiplicity of infection

Mtb

Mycobacterium tuberculosis;

OADC

oleic acid-albumin-dextrose catalase;

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

PDIM

phthiocerol dimycocerosate;

PVDF

polyvinylidene fluoride;

QTL

quantitative trait locus

scRNA-Seq

single-cell RNA sequencing;

SGCF

Systems Genetics Core Facility

SNPs

single-nucleotide polymorphisms

sPLS-DA

sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis;

TB

tuberculosis

Tip5

Tuberculosis ImmunoPhenotype 5;

UNC

University of North Carolina

Data Availability

Summary data are included within the manuscript and supplemental files. Because of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) restriction on the data from Uganda, individual-level data are only available upon request from the Uganda Genetics of TB Data Access Committee (DAC). To initiate a request, contact Dr. Moses Joloba (mlj10@case.edu). For re-analyses of previously published data, relevant repository accession numbers and links are provided in the S1 Data sheet External Data Index.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by an NIH Director’s New Innovator Award AI183152 (C.M. Smith), a Pew Scholars award (C.M. Smith), and the following NIH grants: AI166304 (D.M.T.), AI127715 (D.M.T. and C.M. Smith), AI181898 (T.R.H. and C.M. Smith), AI162583 (T.R.H., C.M. Stein, and H.M.-K.), N01-AI95383 (C.M. Stein), and T32HL007567 (M.L.M.). M.T.P.G. was supported by a grant (88881.625374/2021-01) from the Fulbright Association and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Duke University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), an NIH funded program (5P30 AI064518). The Duke University BRPC is supported in part by the NIH (P30CA014236). Biocontainment work performed in the Duke Regional Biocontainment Laboratory received partial support for construction and renovation from NIAID (UC6-AI058607 and G20-AI167200) and facility support from the NIH (UC7-AI180254). The sponsors or funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Sabin S, Herbig A, Vågene ÅJ, Ahlström T, Bozovic G, Arcini C, et al. A seventeenth-century Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome supports a Neolithic emergence of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02112-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ernst JD. The immunological life cycle of tuberculosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(8):581–91. doi: 10.1038/nri3259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Horton KC, Richards AS, Emery JC, Esmail H, Houben RMGJ. Reevaluating progression and pathways following Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection within the spectrum of tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(47):e2221186120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221186120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kallmann FJ, Reisner D. Twin studies on genetic variations in resistance to tuberculosis. J Hered. 1943;34(9):269–76. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105302 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simonds B. Tuberculosis in twins. London: Pitman; 1963. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Comstock GW. Tuberculosis in twins: a re-analysis of the Prophit survey. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978;117(4):621–4. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.117.4.621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bellamy R, Ruwende C, Corrah T, McAdam KP, Whittle HC, Hill AV. Variations in the NRAMP1 gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis in West Africans. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(10):640–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803053381002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goldfeld AE, Delgado JC, Thim S, Bozon MV, Uglialoro AM, Turbay D, et al. Association of an HLA-DQ allele with clinical tuberculosis. JAMA. 1998;279(3):226–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.3.226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bellamy R, Ruwende C, Corrah T, McAdam KP, Thursz M, Whittle HC, et al. Tuberculosis and chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Africans and variation in the vitamin D receptor gene. J Infect Dis. 1999;179(3):721–4. doi: 10.1086/314614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wilkinson RJ, Llewelyn M, Toossi Z, Patel P, Pasvol G, Lalvani A, et al. Influence of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor polymorphisms on tuberculosis among Gujarati Asians in west London: a case-control study. Lancet. 2000;355(9204):618–21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02301-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.da Cruz HLA, da Silva RC, Segat L, de Carvalho MSZ de MG, Brandão LAC, Guimarães RL, et al. MBL2 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to tuberculosis in a northeastern Brazilian population. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;19:323–9. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mhmoud N, Fahal A, Wendy van de Sande WJ. Association of IL-10 and CCL5 single nucleotide polymorphisms with tuberculosis in the Sudanese population. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(9):1119–27. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen M, Liang Y, Li W, Wang M, Hu L, Abuaku BK, et al. Impact of MBL and MASP-2 gene polymorphism and its interaction on susceptibility to tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:151. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0879-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nägler DK, Ménard R. Human cathepsin X: a novel cysteine protease of the papain family with a very short proregion and unique insertions. FEBS Lett. 1998;434(1–2):135–9. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00964-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Santamaría I, Velasco G, Pendás AM, Fueyo A, López-Otín C. Cathepsin Z, a novel human cysteine proteinase with a short propeptide domain and a unique chromosomal location. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(27):16816–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.27.16816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nägler DK, Zhang R, Tam W, Sulea T, Purisima EO, Ménard R. Human cathepsin X: a cysteine protease with unique carboxypeptidase activity. Biochemistry. 1999;38(39):12648–54. doi: 10.1021/bi991371z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sivaraman J, Nägler DK, Zhang R, Ménard R, Cygler M. Crystal structure of human procathepsin X: a cysteine protease with the proregion covalently linked to the active site cysteine. J Mol Biol. 2000;295(4):939–51. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guncar G, Klemencic I, Turk B, Turk V, Karaoglanovic-Carmona A, Juliano L, et al. Crystal structure of cathepsin X: a flip-flop of the ring of His23 allows carboxy-monopeptidase and carboxy-dipeptidase activity of the protease. Structure. 2000;8(3):305–13. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00108-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Deussing J, von Olshausen I, Peters C. Murine and human cathepsin Z: cDNA-cloning, characterization of the genes and chromosomal localization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1491(1–3):93–106. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00021-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Therrien C, Lachance P, Sulea T, Purisima EO, Qi H, Ziomek E, et al. Cathepsins X and B can be differentiated through their respective mono- and dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase activities. Biochemistry. 2001;40(9):2702–11. doi: 10.1021/bi002460a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Devanathan G, Turnbull JL, Ziomek E, Purisima EO, Ménard R, Sulea T. Carboxy-monopeptidase substrate specificity of human cathepsin X. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329(2):445–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dolenc I, Štefe I, Turk D, Taler-Verčič A, Turk B, Turk V, et al. Human cathepsin X/Z is a biologically active homodimer. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2021;1869(2):140567. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2020.140567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cooke GS, Campbell SJ, Bennett S, Lienhardt C, McAdam KPWJ, Sirugo G, et al. Mapping of a novel susceptibility locus suggests a role for MC3R and CTSZ in human tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(2):203–7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200710-1554OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Adams LA, Möller M, Nebel A, Schreiber S, van der Merwe L, van Helden PD, et al. Polymorphisms in MC3R promoter and CTSZ 3′UTR are associated with tuberculosis susceptibility. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(6):676–81. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stein CM, Zalwango S, Malone LL, Won S, Mayanja-Kizza H, Mugerwa RD, et al. Genome scan of M. tuberculosis infection and disease in Ugandans. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Baker AR, Zalwango S, Malone LL, Igo RP Jr, Qiu F, Nsereko M, et al. Genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis associated with cathepsin Z haplotype in a Ugandan household contact study. Hum Immunol. 2011;72(5):426–30. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2011.02.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Journet A, Chapel A, Kieffer S, Louwagie M, Luche S, Garin J. Towards a human repertoire of monocytic lysosomal proteins. Electrophoresis. 2000;21(16):3411–9. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garin J, Diez R, Kieffer S, Dermine JF, Duclos S, Gagnon E, et al. The phagosome proteome: insight into phagosome functions. J Cell Biol. 2001;152(1):165–80. doi: 10.1083/jcb.152.1.165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kos J, Jevnikar Z, Obermajer N. The role of cathepsin X in cell signaling. Cell Adh Migr. 2009;3(2):164–6. doi: 10.4161/cam.3.2.7403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schmiedel BJ, Singh D, Madrigal A, Valdovino-Gonzalez AG, White BM, Zapardiel-Gonzalo J, et al. Impact of genetic polymorphisms on human immune cell gene expression. Cell. 2018;175(6):1701-1715.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Obermajer N, Svajger U, Bogyo M, Jeras M, Kos J. Maturation of dendritic cells depends on proteolytic cleavage by cathepsin X. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;84(5):1306–15. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0508285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jevnikar Z, Obermajer N, Bogyo M, Kos J. The role of cathepsin X in the migration and invasiveness of T lymphocytes. J Cell Sci. 2008;121(Pt 16):2652–61. doi: 10.1242/jcs.023721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Obermajer N, Repnik U, Jevnikar Z, Turk B, Kreft M, Kos J. Cysteine protease cathepsin X modulates immune response via activation of beta2 integrins. Immunology. 2008;124(1):76–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02740.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pires D, Marques J, Pombo JP, Carmo N, Bettencourt P, Neyrolles O, et al. Role of cathepsins in Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in human macrophages. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32247. doi: 10.1038/srep32247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lewis MS, Danelishvili L, Rose SJ, Bermudez LE. MAV_4644 interaction with the host cathepsin Z protects Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis from rapid macrophage killing. Microorganisms. 2019;7(5):144. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7050144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Saul MC, Philip VM, Reinholdt LG, Chesler EJ; Center for Systems Neurogenetics of Addiction. High-diversity mouse populations for complex traits. Trends Genet. 2019;35(7):501–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Villar-Hernández R, Ghodousi A, Konstantynovska O, Duarte R, Lange C, Raviglione M. Tuberculosis: current challenges and beyond. Breathe (Sheff). 2023;19(1):220166. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0166-2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Medina E, North RJ. Evidence inconsistent with a role for the Bcg gene (Nramp1) in resistance of mice to infection with virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Exp Med. 1996;183(3):1045–51. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.3.1045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Medina E, North RJ. Resistance ranking of some common inbred mouse strains to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and relationship to major histocompatibility complex haplotype and Nramp1 genotype. Immunology. 1998;93(2):270–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1998.00419.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Green EL. Genetics and probability in animal breeding experiments. Macmillan Education UK. 1981. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-04904-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Taylor BA, Heiniger HJ, Meier H. Genetic analysis of resistance to cadmium-induced testicular damage in mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1973;143(3):629–33. doi: 10.3181/00379727-143-37380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Taylor BA, Wnek C, Kotlus BS, Roemer N, MacTaggart T, Phillips SJ. Genotyping new BXD recombinant inbred mouse strains and comparison of BXD and consensus maps. Mamm Genome. 1999;10(4):335–48. doi: 10.1007/s003359900998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Peirce JL, Lu L, Gu J, Silver LM, Williams RW. A new set of BXD recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice. BMC Genet. 2004;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-5-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ashbrook DG, Arends D, Prins P, Mulligan MK, Roy S, Williams EG, et al. A platform for experimental precision medicine: the extended BXD mouse family. Cell Syst. 2021;12(3):235-247.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Churchill GA, Airey DC, Allayee H, Angel JM, Attie AD, Beatty J, et al. The collaborative cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat Genet. 2004;36(11):1133–7. doi: 10.1038/ng1104-1133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Collaborative Cross Consortium. The genome architecture of the collaborative cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics. 2012;190(2):389–401. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Srivastava A, Morgan AP, Najarian ML, Sarsani VK, Sigmon JS, Shorter JR, et al. Genomes of the mouse collaborative cross. Genetics. 2017;206(2):537–56. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.198838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Meade RK, Smith CM. Immunological roads diverged: mapping tuberculosis outcomes in mice. Trends Microbiol. 2025;33(1):15–33. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2024.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Meade RK, Long JE, Jinich A, Rhee KY, Ashbrook DG, Williams RW, et al. Genome-wide screen identifies host loci that modulate Mycobacterium tuberculosis fitness in immunodivergent mice. G3 (Bethesda). 2023;13(9):jkad147. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Smith CM, Baker RE, Proulx MK, Mishra BB, Long JE, Park SW, et al. Host-pathogen genetic interactions underlie tuberculosis susceptibility in genetically diverse mice. Elife. 2022;11:e74419. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Koyuncu D, Niazi MKK, Tavolara T, Abeijon C, Ginese ML, Liao Y, et al. CXCL1: a new diagnostic biomarker for human tuberculosis discovered using diversity outbred mice. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(8):e1009773. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ahmed M, Thirunavukkarasu S, Rosa BA, Thomas KA, Das S, Rangel-Moreno J, et al. Immune correlates of tuberculosis disease and risk translate across species. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(528):eaay0233. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay0233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Moreira-Teixeira L, Tabone O, Graham CM, Singhania A, Stavropoulos E, Redford PS, et al. Mouse transcriptome reveals potential signatures of protection and pathogenesis in human tuberculosis. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(4):464–76. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0610-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zak DE, Penn-Nicholson A, Scriba TJ, Thompson E, Suliman S, Amon LM, et al. A blood RNA signature for tuberculosis disease risk: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2016;387(10035):2312–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01316-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Adams DJ, Doran AG, Lilue J, Keane TM. The Mouse Genomes Project: a repository of inbred laboratory mouse strain genomes. Mamm Genome. 2015;26(9–10):403–12. doi: 10.1007/s00335-015-9579-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Desvignes L, Wolf AJ, Ernst JD. Dynamic roles of type I and type II IFNs in early infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2012;188(12):6205–15. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wolf AJ, Desvignes L, Linas B, Banaiee N, Tamura T, Takatsu K, et al. Initiation of the adaptive immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis depends on antigen production in the local lymph node, not the lungs. J Exp Med. 2008;205(1):105–15. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gopal R, Monin L, Torres D, Slight S, Mehra S, McKenna KC, et al. S100A8/A9 proteins mediate neutrophilic inflammation and lung pathology during tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(9):1137–46. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201304-0803OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cronan MR, Hughes EJ, Brewer WJ, Viswanathan G, Hunt EG, Singh B, et al. A non-canonical type 2 immune response coordinates tuberculous granuloma formation and epithelialization. Cell. 2021;184(7):1757-1774.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gideon HP, Hughes TK, Tzouanas CN, Wadsworth MH 2nd, Tu AA, Gierahn TM, et al. Multimodal profiling of lung granulomas in macaques reveals cellular correlates of tuberculosis control. Immunity. 2022;55(5):827-846.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McHenry ML, Simmons J, Hong H, Malone LL, Mayanja-Kizza H, Bush WS, et al. Tuberculosis severity associates with variants and eQTLs related to vascular biology and infection-induced inflammation. PLoS Genet. 2023;19(3):e1010387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rudolf F. The Bandim TBscore—reliability, further development, and evaluation of potential uses. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:24303. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.24303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Simmons JD, Dill-McFarland KA, Stein CM, Van PT, Chihota V, Ntshiqa T, et al. Monocyte transcriptional responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis associate with resistance to tuberculin skin test and interferon gamma release assay conversion. mSphere. 2022;7(3):e0015922. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00159-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yanai I, Benjamin H, Shmoish M, Chalifa-Caspi V, Shklar M, Ophir R, et al. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(5):650–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pyle CJ, Wang L, Beerman RW, Jain V, Ohman HKE, Thompson BA, et al. Paired single-cell and spatial transcriptional profiling reveals a central osteopontin macrophage response mediating tuberculous granuloma formation. mBio. 2025:e0155925. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01559-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cronan MR. In the thick of it: formation of the tuberculous granuloma and its effects on host and therapeutic responses. Front Immunol. 2022;13:820134. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.820134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Obermajer N, Premzl A, Zavasnik Bergant T, Turk B, Kos J. Carboxypeptidase cathepsin X mediates beta2-integrin-dependent adhesion of differentiated U-937 cells. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312(13):2515–27. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.04.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Augenstreich J, Haanappel E, Sayes F, Simeone R, Guillet V, Mazeres S, et al. Phthiocerol dimycocerosates from Mycobacterium tuberculosis increase the membrane activity of bacterial effectors and host receptors. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:420. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Boro M, Balaji KN. CXCL1 and CXCL2 regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation via G-protein–coupled receptor CXCR2. J Immunol. 2017;199(5):1660–71. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Keller C, Hoffmann R, Lang R, Brandau S, Hermann C, Ehlers S. Genetically determined susceptibility to tuberculosis in mice causally involves accelerated and enhanced recruitment of granulocytes. Infect Immun. 2006;74(7):4295–309. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00057-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Krueger S, Bernhardt A, Kalinski T, Baldensperger M, Zeh M, Teller A, et al. Induction of premalignant host responses by cathepsin x/z-deficiency in Helicobacter pylori-infected mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Haist M, Ries F, Gunzer M, Bednarczyk M, Siegel E, Kuske M, et al. Neutrophil-specific knockdown of β2 integrins impairs antifungal effector functions and aggravates the course of invasive pulmonal aspergillosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:823121. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.823121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jevnikar Z, Obermajer N, Pecar-Fonović U, Karaoglanovic-Carmona A, Kos J. Cathepsin X cleaves the β2 cytoplasmic tail of LFA‐1 inducing the intermediate affinity form of LFA‐1 and α‐actinin‐1 binding. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39(11):3217–27. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jevnikar Z, Obermajer N, Doljak B, Turk S, Gobec S, Svajger U, et al. Cathepsin X cleavage of the β2 integrin regulates talin-binding and LFA-1 affinity in T cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;90(1):99–109. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1110622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gupta M, Srikrishna G, Klein SL, Bishai WR. Genetic and hormonal mechanisms underlying sex-specific immune responses in tuberculosis. Trends Immunol. 2022;43(8):640–56. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2022.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Barcena ML, Niehues MH, Christiansen C, Estepa M, Haritonow N, Sadighi AH, et al. Male macrophages and fibroblasts from C57/BL6J mice are more susceptible to inflammatory stimuli. Front Immunol. 2021;12:758767. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.758767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Krueger S, Kalinski T, Hundertmark T, Wex T, Küster D, Peitz U, et al. Up-regulation of cathepsin X in Helicobacter pylori gastritis and gastric cancer. J Pathol. 2005;207(1):32–42. doi: 10.1002/path.1820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Selkrig J, Li N, Hausmann A, Mangan MSJ, Zietek M, Mateus A, et al. Spatiotemporal proteomics uncovers cathepsin-dependent macrophage cell death during Salmonella infection. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(9):1119–33. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0736-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wendt W, Zhu X-R, Lübbert H, Stichel CC. Differential expression of cathepsin X in aging and pathological central nervous system of mice. Exp Neurol. 2007;204(2):525–40. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kraus S, Bunsen T, Schuster S, Cichoń MA, Tacke M, Reinheckel T, et al. Cellular senescence induced by cathepsin X downregulation. Eur J Cell Biol. 2011;90(8):678–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Allan ERO, Campden RI, Ewanchuk BW, Tailor P, Balce DR, McKenna NT, et al. A role for cathepsin Z in neuroinflammation provides mechanistic support for an epigenetic risk factor in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0874-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nishida N, Aiba Y, Hitomi Y, Kawashima M, Kojima K, Kawai Y, et al. NELFCD and CTSZ loci are associated with jaundice-stage progression in primary biliary cholangitis in the Japanese population. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26369-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Aiba Y, Harada K, Ito M, Suematsu T, Aishima S, Hitomi Y, et al. Increased expression and altered localization of cathepsin Z are associated with progression to jaundice stage in primary biliary cholangitis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30146-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Dera AA, Ranganath L, Barraclough R, Vinjamuri S, Hamill S, Barraclough DL. Cathepsin Z as a novel potential biomarker for osteoporosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46068-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hafner A, Glavan G, Obermajer N, Živin M, Schliebs R, Kos J. Neuroprotective role of γ-enolase in microglia in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease is regulated by cathepsin X. Aging Cell. 2013;12(4):604–14. doi: 10.1111/acel.12093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Olson OC, Joyce JA. Cysteine cathepsin proteases: regulators of cancer progression and therapeutic response. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(12):712–29. doi: 10.1038/nrc4027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Li J, Zhou X, Li L, Ji L, Li J, Qu Y, et al. The association between CTSZ methylation in peripheral blood and breast cancer in Chinese women. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1148635. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1148635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Vizin T, Christensen IJ, Nielsen HJ, Kos J. Cathepsin X in serum from patients with colorectal cancer: relation to prognosis. Radiol Oncol. 2012;46(3):207–12. doi: 10.2478/v10019-012-0040-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Nägler DK, Krüger S, Kellner A, Ziomek E, Menard R, Buhtz P, et al. Up-regulation of cathepsin X in prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Prostate. 2004;60(2):109–19. doi: 10.1002/pros.20046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wang J, Chen L, Li Y, Guan X-Y. Overexpression of cathepsin Z contributes to tumor metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sevenich L, Schurigt U, Sachse K, Gajda M, Werner F, Müller S, et al. Synergistic antitumor effects of combined cathepsin B and cathepsin Z deficiencies on breast cancer progression and metastasis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(6):2497–502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907240107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang J, Sha J, Strong E, Chopra AK, Lee S. FDA-approved amoxapine effectively promotes macrophage control of mycobacteria by inducing autophagy. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(5):e0250922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02509-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Stein CM, Zalwango S, Malone LL, Thiel B, Mupere E, Nsereko M, et al. Resistance and susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and disease in tuberculosis households in Kampala, Uganda. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(7):1477–89. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wejse C, Gustafson P, Nielsen J, Gomes VF, Aaby P, Andersen PL, et al. TBscore: signs and symptoms from tuberculosis patients in a low-resource setting have predictive value and may be used to assess clinical course. Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(2):111–20. doi: 10.1080/00365540701558698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Shin J-H, Blay S, Graham J, McNeney B. LDheatmap: an R function for graphical display of pairwise linkage disequilibria between single nucleotide polymorphisms. J Stat Soft. 2006;16(Code Snippet 3). doi: 10.18637/jss.v016.c03 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dill-McFarland KA, Mitchell K, Batchu S, Segnitz RM, Benson B, Janczyk T, et al. Kimma: flexible linear mixed effects modeling with kinship covariance for RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(5):btad279. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK. voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 2014;15(2):R29. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Melissa Vazquez Hernandez

31 Mar 2025

Dear Dr Smith,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Cathepsin Z is a conserved susceptibility factor underlying tuberculosis severity" for consideration by PLOS Biology.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff, as well as by an academic editor with relevant expertise, and I am writing to let you know that we would like to send your submission out for external peer review as Short Report, since there is no molecular mechanism. The Academic Editor also mentioned that it would be interesting to find out why is CtsZ and not other cathepsin. This does not mean that this should be addressed before full submission, but I wanted to pass the comment to you.

However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire. Please, when adding the rest of the metadata choose "Short Report".

Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. After your manuscript has passed the checks it will be sent out for review. To provide the metadata for your submission, please Login to Editorial Manager (https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology) within two working days, i.e. by Apr 02 2025 11:59PM.

If your manuscript has been previously peer-reviewed at another journal, PLOS Biology is willing to work with those reviews in order to avoid re-starting the process. Submission of the previous reviews is entirely optional and our ability to use them effectively will depend on the willingness of the previous journal to confirm the content of the reports and share the reviewer identities. Please note that we reserve the right to invite additional reviewers if we consider that additional/independent reviewers are needed, although we aim to avoid this as far as possible. In our experience, working with previous reviews does save time.

If you would like us to consider previous reviewer reports, please edit your cover letter to let us know and include the name of the journal where the work was previously considered and the manuscript ID it was given. In addition, please upload a response to the reviews as a 'Prior Peer Review' file type, which should include the reports in full and a point-by-point reply detailing how you have or plan to address the reviewers' concerns.

During the process of completing your manuscript submission, you will be invited to opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. Visit http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/preprints for full details. If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint, please upload a single Preprint PDF.

Feel free to email us at plosbiology@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Melissa

Melissa Vazquez Hernandez, Ph.D.

Associate Editor

PLOS Biology

mvazquezhernandez@plos.org

Decision Letter 1

Melissa Vazquez Hernandez

21 May 2025

Dear Dr Smith,

Thank you for your patience while your manuscript "Cathepsin Z is a conserved susceptibility factor underlying tuberculosis severity" was peer-reviewed at PLOS Biology. It has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, an Academic Editor with relevant expertise, and by three independent reviewers.

In light of the reviews, which you will find at the end of this email, we would like to invite you to revise the work to thoroughly address the reviewers' reports. As you will see below, majority of reviewers are positive about the relevance and novelty of the study, yet some concerns have raised during revision. Reviewer 1 raises some concerns regarding the Western Blots and wonders why there are sex-dependent outcomes. Reviewer 2 wonders about the bacterial load in the lung, the mechanistical basis for the CTSZ-CXCL1 axis and the reasons for mortality rate after 200 dpi. Reviewer 3 was more negative, saying that the study lacks mechanistic details even for a SR. While Short Reports do not always require mechanistic insights, we do agree with most of the reviewer concerns and would require some additional experimental revisions to address them, as we consider that this would strengthen the work.

Given the extent of revision needed, we cannot make a decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is likely to be sent for further evaluation by all or a subset of the reviewers.

In addition to these revisions, you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests shortly.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 3 months. Please email us (plosbiology@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension.

At this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our journal; please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that we may withdraw it.

**IMPORTANT - SUBMITTING YOUR REVISION**

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point-by-point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since the original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted" file type.

*Re-submission Checklist*

When you are ready to resubmit your revised manuscript, please refer to this re-submission checklist: https://plos.io/Biology_Checklist

To submit a revised version of your manuscript, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' where you will find your submission record.

Please make sure to read the following important policies and guidelines while preparing your revision:

*Published Peer Review*

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*PLOS Data Policy*

Please note that as a condition of publication PLOS' data policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions arrived at in your manuscript. If you have not already done so, you must include any data used in your manuscript either in appropriate repositories, within the body of the manuscript, or as supporting information (N.B. this includes any numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.). For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

*Blot and Gel Data Policy*

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare them now, if you have not already uploaded them. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive thus far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Melissa

Melissa Vazquez Hernandez, Ph.D.

Associate Editor

PLOS Biology

mvazquezhernandez@plos.org

------------------------------------

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

------------------------------------

Reviewer #1:

Various association studies and some in vitro work have been suggesting an involvement of cathepsin Z (CTSZ) in the susceptibility for mycobacterial infection causing tuberculosis (TB). Based on their previous work on recombinant inbred mouse strains, which identified a TB susceptibility locus on mouse chromosome 2, the authors of this manuscript now identify and validate CTSZ as important mediator of this susceptibility in vivo. This is further connected to the inflammatory response of macrophages, especially increased CXCL1 upon CTSZ deficiency. Finally the paper provides evidence for variants in human CTSZ associated with TB severity in patients. Overall the manuscripts provides important, novel, and mostly convincing information.

Major issues:

1) CTSZ Western blots (Figure 1B/C; Sup. Figure 1B). Background: Cathepsin Z is produced as a pre-pro-protein. After cleaving of the signal peptide in the ER, Western blots usually detect the inactive Pro-CTSZ and the active mature CTSZ. The mature enzyme is generated by cleaving of a 60 amino acid "activation peptide" from the Pro-CTSZ. This is causing a band shift of 4-5 kDa. Some cell types with high CTSZ activity may predominantly (or only) show the active enzyme.

Questions: The Western blots show multiple bands - what bands correspond to which form of CTSZ? What bands were used for quantification shown in Fig 1C? Supp. Figure 1B (intended to proof CTSZ ko) lacks loading controls and shows somewhat different band pattern to Fig 1B.

Recommendation: For detection of mouse CTSZ in mice use R&D AF 1033; the "all-purpose" AF934 is inferior when used on mouse tissue samples.

2) It is striking that the reduced survival in experimental TB is only evident for male CTSZ ko, but not for females of this genotype. Figure 3E+F, analyze macrophages of male mice for CXCL1 production. Is there a CXCL1-difference in female-derived wt and CTSZ ko macrophages? Whatever the outcome it could serve as a starting point to discuss this important sex-dependent outcome (the discussion of this point is not sufficiently elaborated in the current manuscript).

Minor issues:

1) Ctsz-/- Mice: Please give the appropriate full nomenclature of the mice according to the mouse genome informatics database in the method section (as for the IFNg mice). Further note that mice had been generated on a mixed genetic background and were backcrossed to C57BL/6. This has been first reported in PMID: 25274726.

2) Please consider/discuss: The mice have been generated in HM1 ES cells (129P2/OlaHsd background). The mice were carefully backcrossed; but the original background is likely to be maintained around the CTSZ knock-out locus (for which the genotyping selects). How would this affect the results?

3) Supplement. Figure 1A: Please label the PCR bands (what are the specific PCR products?) Please explain in the figure legend to a general reader, why the PCR products form (or not form) in the WT and KO PCRs.

------------------------------------

Reviewer #2:

This study by Maede et al. has investigated the impact of Cathepsin Z loss of function on the susceptibility to M. tuberculosis. Their focus on Ctsz comes from previous QTL mapping on Collaborative Cross mice pointing at a small region of chromosome 2 and from converging evidence from human GWAS linking SNPs in Ctsz and susceptibility to TB. This study assembles experimental data produced by the authors mostly on mice but also on human samples and data from previously published study in humans, macaques and zebrafish. They identify CXCL1 overexpression in monocytes/macrophages as a prominent perturbation in Ctsz KO mice. In a human cohort, they show association between TB severity and Ctsz expression in patient-derived monocytes. Finally, they show that Ctsz is expressed in human granuloma macrophages, at the interface between the host and the pathogen.

The merit of this article is to establish the functional impact of genetic variations (null alleles or SNPs) in the Ctsz gene and the susceptibility to TB, and to link it to CXCL1 expression. While the association between severe TB and Ctsz variants has been reported in several studies, experimental evidence of their role was missing.

The results are well presented (with some improvements suggested below) and the conclusions are supported by the data. The article is well-written and structured, especially in regard to the multiple sources and nature of the data. The findings will be interesting to researchers in the TB field and beyond considering the implication of Ctsz in multiple infectious, immune, neurodegenerative or cancer diseases.

Main comments

Although this is not the main focus of the paper, it is interesting to note (Fig 1D) that lung bacteria load is much higher in CC033 and CC038 than in Ctsz -/- mice, suggesting that they carry other susceptibility genes.

The authors mention a "CTSZ-CXCL1 axis" but do not establish a functional link between the two genes, despite the observation that CXCL1 expression is higher in Ctsz-deficient mice. What is the basis for this "axis"? What could be the mechanisms (direct or indirect?) linking these two genes and the potential downstream consequences? Expanding the discussion on this aspect of the work would point at future directions of research.

Ctsz deficiency results in increased lung bacterial burden and CXCL1 expression in the early phase of infection (W2-W4, Fig 2A, 2F) but does no longer at W8 (at least not significantly). However, it results in increased mortality rate starting 200 days p.i. (Fig 2F), as stated in lines 251-253, and 373-375. Could the authors discuss this observation and suggest mechanisms? Do they have data on bacterial burden at later time points that would support chronically (though modestly) elevated bacterial burden? Or could it be due to unfavorable events in the early phase of infection that determine the final outcome?

Minor comments

Lines 86-88: the sentence mixes two distinct points. First, inbred mice (including CC) are genetically identical within strains, which allows replication, investigating sex differences and disease incidence. Second, common laboratory strains were developed from a small pool of progenitors and therefore sample a small amount of genetic polymorphism, much smaller than that of the human population.

Line 100: We therefore sought to determine WHICH genes found

Line 127: Are cathepsin X or P identical to cathepsin Z (confusing nomenclature) or different members of a family?

Line 131: is rhesus monkey ZNF831 homologous to mouse Zfp831? Please explain.

Lines 213-214: specify that uninfected mice are denoted as W0

Line 242, Fig 2C: the heatmap does not show obvious differences between B6 and Ctsz-/- mice. This data should be added as a plot to Fig 2F.

Mine 279, Fig 3E: add the type of infection as a plot label. log-tranform data as in Fig 2F to better visualize low levels.

Line 311 and Fig4B, C, D: show statistical comparison on the plots. In the text, specify that the effect of the T minor allele is based on the comparison between the CC and CT groups.

Lines 319-321: Together, these data suggest that THESE CTSZ variants are associated with both TB disease severity…

Lines 375-376: Explicitly describe the effect. "We show" is exaggerated by comparison with lines 297-298: "suggest an interaction"

Lines 412-414: Do the authors consider Ctsz just as a "correlate"? From the data, they could argue it is a determinant.

Lines 463-466: by crossing heterozygotes to keep the two alleles in the same colony?

------------------------------------

Reviewer #3:

The work of Meade et al is an elegant use of mouse genetics to identify the host determinants of susceptibility and resistance to M. tuberculosis (Mtb). In their prior work they had leveraged the genetic diversity of collaborative cross (CC) mice to identify an Mtb susceptibility locus (Tip5). Here they report that one of the genes, cathepsin z (Ctsz), acts to restrict Mtb replication in mice, and they perform analysis on human genetic data that also finds an association of CTSZ with host defense. This study has several strengths, including its basis in sophisticated and rigorous mouse genetic analysis, the leveraging of multiple public datasets to analyze their candidate gene, and integration of new clinical data. However, there are also some weaknesses in this manuscript. The mechanistic details are somewhat sparse, even for a Short Report manuscript. In addition, while the work does make significant advances, it does not quite generate the level of excitement that would appeal to a broad audience needed for publication in a very high-impact journal like PLOS Biology.

There were multiple strengths to this study including a systematic use of public data to narrow candidates (Fig 1A), carefully controlled animal experiments (Fig 1,2), analysis correlating human SNPs to expression of CATZ. Review concerns are listed below.

Major Issues

* While identifying role for Ctsz in vivo an advance for TB researchers, probably not high-impact enough for a general audience. Impact is also somewhat decreased by the existing (though admittedly not very in-depth) work done on Ctsz in macrophages (PMID: 275726050), this group's prior work identifying Tip5 region (PMID: 35112666) as well as prior human genetics work implicating CTSZ in clinical TB (PMID: 21354459)

* Mechanism is somewhat unclear both for how Ctsz is acting, and what the mutation is that is altering its expression in mice. Are there likely SNPs near Ctsz that might be altering expression? Does CTSZ directly restrict Mtb in the BMDMs they generated, or is it acting indirectly in vivo through cytokine release or other means?

*

A. Minor Issues

* Fig 2C- Many of these changes are likely to be consequence of higher bacterial burden rather than CTSZ directly; unclear exactly what is being plotted on heatmap. Log2FC?

* Fig 2G- no statistics shown

* Fig 3- these are relatively modest changes in cytokine levels

* Fig 2 - looks at mouse CTSZ protein levels but not RNA, figure 4 looks at human CTSZ RNA levels but not protein. Would be helpful to link, perhaps by examining CTSZ RNA in mouse lungs or BMDMs alongside protein.

* Fig 4D - these seem like fairly small changes but hard to tell on Log2 scale. Linear scale probably more appropriate with such small differences.

* Fig 4E probably would be useful to show some non-macrophage marker as a control (TCR? CD20?)

Decision Letter 2

Melissa Vazquez Hernandez

6 Aug 2025

Dear Clare,

Thank you for your patience while we considered your revised manuscript "Cathepsin Z is a conserved susceptibility factor underlying tuberculosis severity" for publication as a Short Reports at PLOS Biology. This revised version of your manuscript has been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, and by the Academic Editor.

Based on our Academic Editor's assessment of your revision, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, provided you satisfactorily address the remaining editorial requests. Please also make sure to address the following data and other policy-related requests.

a) You may be aware of the PLOS Data Policy, which requires that all data be made available without restriction: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability. For more information, please also see this editorial: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001797

Please supply the numerical values either in the a supplementary file or as a permanent DOI’d deposition for the following figures:

Figure 1CDE, 2A-G, 3CFGH, 4ABCDG, S1B, S2ABC, S3A-F

NOTE: the numerical data provided should include all replicates AND the way in which the plotted mean and errors were derived (it should not present only the mean/average values).

b) Please cite the location of the data clearly in all relevant main and supplementary Figure legends, e.g. “The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data” or “The data underlying this Figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.XXXXX”

c) Please add a scale bar in the following microscopy pictures in Figures: 4I

d) We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in the Figures 1B, S2A

e) For figures containing FACS data (Figures 3ABDE, 4EF), please provide the FCS files and a picture showing the successive plots and gates that were applied to the FCS files to generate the figure. We ask that you please deposit this data in the FlowRepository (https://flowrepository.org/) and provide the accession number/URL of the deposition in the Data Availability Statement in the online submission form. If FlowRepository is not available, you can upload the files in our system or to a permanent depository like Zenodo

f) Per journal policy, if you have generated any custom code during the course of this investigation, please make it available without restrictions. Please ensure that the code is sufficiently well documented and reusable, and that your Data Statement in the Editorial Manager submission system accurately describes where your code can be found.

As you address these items, please take this last chance to review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the cover letter that accompanies your revised manuscript.

In addition to these revisions, you may need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests shortly. If you do not receive a separate email within a few days, please assume that checks have been completed, and no additional changes are required.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within two weeks.

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include the following:

- a cover letter that should detail your responses to any editorial requests, if applicable, and whether changes have been made to the reference list

- a Response to Reviewers file that provides a detailed response to the reviewers' comments (if applicable, if not applicable please do not delete your existing 'Response to Reviewers' file.)

- a track-changes file indicating any changes that you have made to the manuscript.

NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information

*Published Peer Review History*

Please note that you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://plos.org/published-peer-review-history/

*Press*

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, please ensure you have opted out of Early Article Posting on the submission form. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article.

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Melissa

Melissa Vazquez Hernandez, Ph.D.

Associate Editor

mvazquezhernandez@plos.org

PLOS Biology

Decision Letter 3

Melissa Vazquez Hernandez

22 Aug 2025

Dear Clare,

Thank you for the submission of your revised Short Reports "Cathepsin Z is a conserved susceptibility factor underlying tuberculosis severity" for publication in PLOS Biology. On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Maximiliano Gutierrez, I am pleased to say that we can in principle accept your manuscript for publication, provided you address any remaining formatting and reporting issues. These will be detailed in an email you should receive within 2-3 business days from our colleagues in the journal operations team; no action is required from you until then. Please note that we will not be able to formally accept your manuscript and schedule it for publication until you have completed any requested changes.

Please take a minute to log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production process.

PRESS

We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have previously opted in to the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may opt out on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for choosing PLOS Biology for publication and supporting Open Access publishing. We look forward to publishing your study. 

Sincerely, 

Melissa

Melissa Vazquez Hernandez, Ph.D., Ph.D.

Associate Editor

PLOS Biology

mvazquezhernandez@plos.org

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Genetic validation and infection of Ctsz−/− mice.

    (A) Expression of wildtype and truncated Ctsz in tail sections from B6, Ctsz+/−, and Ctsz−/− mice. Approximate sizes of wildtype and truncated PCR products are indicated by black arrows. As previously described by Sevenich and colleagues, 2010 [91], exon 2 (containing the active site cysteine critical for the enzymatic activity of Ctsz), and a portion of intron 3 in Ctsz were deleted by homologous recombination and substituted by a cassette comprising an independent ribosomal entry sequence (IRES). External confirmation of these results was obtained by probing the lacZ reporter gene present in the inserted IRES vector. (B) Bacterial burden measured by dilution plating from spleen homogenate 4 weeks after aerosol infection with Mtb H37Rv (n = 3–12 per strain; all males except B6 and Ctsz−/− groups, which included both sexes in equal proportion). Hypothesis testing was performed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post hoc test on log10-transformed values. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheet S1B.

    (PDF)

    pbio.3003377.s001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)
    S2 Fig. sPLS-DA and survival analysis comparing Ctsz/ and B6 mice.

    (A) Phenotype loadings contributing to sparse component 2. Mice were sacrificed at 2, 3, 4, and 8 weeks after aerosolized Mtb infection. Data are from two experiments with n = 6–14 mice per genotype, representative of both sexes, at each time point. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates of aerosol-infected B6 (n = 23) and Ctsz−/− mice (n = 62) across two independent experiments, among (B) male and (C) female mice. Hypothesis testing was performed using a log-rank test. Equal proportions of both sexes were included. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheets 2ABCDEF_S2A and 2G_S2BC.

    (PDF)

    pbio.3003377.s002.pdf (706.1KB, pdf)
    S3 Fig. Minor alleles of CTSZ SNPs within the TB severity haplotype block are associated with lower TB severity score and significantly greater CTSZ expression.

    Comparison of TB severity, measured using Bandim TBScore, by genotype for (A) rs111630627, (B) rs8120779, and (C) rs76687632 SNPs. Expression of each allele of each SNP was assessed by RNA-Seq at 6 h after mock and Mtb infection in human-derived monocytes. CTSZ expression by monocytes harboring the minor allele for each SNP was significantly increased following both infection conditions for the (D) rs111630627, (E) rs8120779, and (F) rs76687632 SNPs. eQTL effects were assessed with a linear mixed effect model in kimma to account for sex, age, RNA-Seq batch, genotypic principal components 1 and 2, and kinship. The data underlying this figure can be found in S1 Data sheet 4CD_S3DEF.

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. Cathepsin mRNA is highly expressed in human Mtb granuloma macrophages.

    (A) Heatmap depicting mRNA expression levels of several cathepsins and macrophage markers across unsupervised scRNA-Seq cell clusters. (B) The positional distribution of CTSZ expression in human Mtb granulomas as determined by Visium v2 spatial mRNA-Seq of Eosin-stained biopsy tissue sections from two patients with TB. This figure was generated by re-analysis of previously published data from Pyle and colleagues, 2025 [65]. Cell clusters were annotated by the authors. Data from Pyle and colleagues, 2025 are available in the NCBI GEO under accession numbers GSE296399 and GSE296400.

    (PDF)

    pbio.3003377.s004.pdf (27.9MB, pdf)
    S1 File. Fig 1B raw image.

    (TIF)

    pbio.3003377.s005.tif (15.2MB, tif)
    S2 File. S1A Fig raw image.

    (PNG)

    pbio.3003377.s006.png (2.3MB, png)
    S1 Data

    Source data for main and supporting figures.

    (XLSX)

    pbio.3003377.s007.xlsx (187.3KB, xlsx)
    S1 Raw images

    Annotated raw images for Fig 1B and S1A Fig.

    (PDF)

    pbio.3003377.s008.pdf (16.9MB, pdf)
    S1 Table. Complete list of 81 CTSZ SNPs present in Ugandan household contact study cohorts and their associations with TB severity.

    TB severity was evaluated by Bandim TBScore. Summary statistics for the CTSZ variants shown are based on a meta-analysis of two independent cohorts of culture-confirmed adult TB cases (described in McHenry and colleagues, 2023 [61]). Each cohort utilized a linear regression model that controlled for HIV status, sex, and one principal component. Unadjusted p-values are reported. Abbreviations: CHR, chromosome; BP, base pair from GRCh38 build; MAF, minor allele frequency.

    (XLSX)

    pbio.3003377.s009.xlsx (15.4KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 2025.07.21_Response to Reviewers.docx

    pbio.3003377.s012.docx (1.2MB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 2025.07.21_Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_3.docx

    pbio.3003377.s013.docx (1.2MB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Summary data are included within the manuscript and supplemental files. Because of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) restriction on the data from Uganda, individual-level data are only available upon request from the Uganda Genetics of TB Data Access Committee (DAC). To initiate a request, contact Dr. Moses Joloba (mlj10@case.edu). For re-analyses of previously published data, relevant repository accession numbers and links are provided in the S1 Data sheet External Data Index.


    Articles from PLOS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES