Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1981;320:219–228. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013945

Morphology and distribution of touch cell terminals in the skin of the leech.

S E Blackshaw
PMCID: PMC1244043  PMID: 7320936

Abstract

1. The receptor terminals of individual mechanosensory neurones responding to light touch (T cells) have been visualized directly in the skin of the leech by injecting horseradish peroxidase (HRP) into their cell bodies in the central nervous system. The axons of injected cells could be followed from their origin in the neuropile of the ganglion to their terminals in the skin. 2. The axons of T cells run through ipsilateral nerve roots in the body wall to the base of the layer of epithelial cells in the skin. Here axons branch extensively and turn between the epithelial cells to end a few microns from the skin surface. These terminals are situated in intercellular spaces immediately below the junctional complex joining the outer ends of the epithelial cells. 3. The T cell terminals are free nerve endings with a beaded appearance; they contain large mitochondria and clusters of vesicles. 4. An individual T cell makes about 100 endings within a square millimetre of skin in the centre of its territory, and is estimated to make a total of several hundred endings. 5. The distribution of T cell endings observed directly agrees with physiological studies of receptive field organization and emphasizes the high degree of specificity of connexions of these neurones with their peripheral targets.

Full text

PDF
219

Images in this article

228-1Plate 1
on p.228-1
228-2Plate 2
on p.228-2
228-3Plate 3
on p.228-3
228-4Plate 4
on p.228-4

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blackshaw S., Nicholls J. Distribution and morphology of touch cell endings in leech skin [proceedings]. J Physiol. 1979 Jul;292:26P–28P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burgess P. R., English K. B., Horch K. W., Stensaas L. J. Patterning in the regeneration of type I cutaneous receptors. J Physiol. 1974 Jan;236(1):57–82. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper E., Diamond J. A quantitative study of the mechanosensory innervation of the salmander skin. J Physiol. 1977 Jan;264(3):695–723. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fett M. J. Quantitative mapping of cutaneous receptive fields in normal and operated leeches, Limnobdella. J Exp Biol. 1978 Oct;76:167–179. doi: 10.1242/jeb.76.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Graham R. C., Jr, Karnovsky M. J. The early stages of absorption of injected horseradish peroxidase in the proximal tubules of mouse kidney: ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique. J Histochem Cytochem. 1966 Apr;14(4):291–302. doi: 10.1177/14.4.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iggo A., Kornhuber H. H. A quantitative study of C-mechanoreceptors in hairy skin of the cat. J Physiol. 1977 Oct;271(2):549–565. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Iggo A., Muir A. R. The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):763–796. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johansson R. S. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:101–125. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:283–300. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Muller K. J., McMahan U. J. The shapes of sensory and motor neurones and the distribution of their synapses in ganglia of the leech: a study using intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 Nov 12;194(1117):481–499. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1976.0090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Muller K. J. Synapses between neurones in the central nervous system of the leech. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1979 May;54(2):99–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1979.tb00869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nicholls J. G., Baylor D. A. Specific modalities and receptive fields of sensory neurons in CNS of the leech. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Sep;31(5):740–756. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.5.740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Essen D. C., Jansen J. K. The specificity of re-innervation by identified sensory and motor neurons in the leech. J Comp Neurol. 1977 Feb 15;171(4):433–454. doi: 10.1002/cne.901710402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yau K. W. Physiological properties and receptive fields of mechanosensory neurones in the head ganglion of the leech: comparison with homologous cells in segmental ganglia. J Physiol. 1976 Dec;263(3):489–512. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yau K. W. Receptive fields, geometry and conduction block of sensory neurones in the central nervous system of the leech. J Physiol. 1976 Dec;263(3):513–538. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES