SUMMARY
Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated release of mediators from mast cells (MCs) drives food allergy, and intestinal MC load is an important determinant of disease severity. Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8)-deficient patients are highly susceptible to food allergy. We found that they exhibited elevated serum MC tryptase levels, suggesting increased MC load. Dock8−/− mice also had exaggerated IgE-mediated oral anaphylaxis, expansion of jejunal mucosal MCs (MMCs), and elevated serum levels of MMC-derived tryptase. This resulted in increased intestinal permeability, which promoted antigen absorption and thereby oral anaphylaxis. Mechanistically, these events were driven by an intestinal cascade in which reduced interleukin (IL)-17 cytokines led to dysbiosis, which drove IL-25 production. Increased IL-25 enhanced T helper (Th)2 production of IL-4 that expanded MMCs and exaggerated oral anaphylaxis. Furthermore, the failure of DOCK8-deficient T regulatory (Treg) cells to suppress intestinal IL-4 production and MC expansion left the exaggerated anaphylaxis unrestrained. These results suggest multi-faceted coordination between the microbiome, mucosal T cells, and MCs to restrict oral anaphylaxis.
In brief
DOCK8-deficient patients and mice are prone to food allergy and oral anaphylaxis. Here, Janssen et al. demonstrate that DOCK8 deficiency yields expanded mucosal mast cells and elevated circulating tryptase concentrations. Loss of DOCK8 in T cells impairs Th17 and Treg cells, resulting in dysbiosis and unrestrained IL-4-driven mast cell expansion. Disruption of this cascade attenuates oral anaphylaxis.
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Food allergy affects 6%–8% of children and 3% of adults in the US.1–3 Exposure to food allergens through a disrupted skin barrier or a dysbiotic gut drives immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization to foods.4–6 The effector phase in food allergy depends on mast cell (MC) degranulation following antigen recognition by IgE antibodies (Abs) bound to high-affinity immunoglobulin epsilon receptor I (FcεRI). An important determinant of the severity of food anaphylaxis is intestinal MC load.7–9 MC mediator release in the gut increases intestinal permeability and thereby promotes intestinal absorption of antigen and subsequent increased systemic MC activation and anaphylaxis.10 An important determinant of the severity of food anaphylaxis is intestinal MC load.7–9 Determining the factors that drive intestinal MC load and activity is key to better understanding and treatment of food allergy.
The intestinal microbiome plays a role in food allergy.11–13 Specific taxa of gut bacteria are associated with food allergy in human infants. Administration of such bacteria promotes IgE Ab production and anaphylaxis in mouse models of food allergy, whereas administration of bacteria from healthy infants is protective.14,15 Cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-22 in the gut are induced by specific members of the microbiome.16–18 They, in turn, act to promote antimicrobial gene expression by intestinal epithelial cells (IECs).19 Lack of IL-22 or IL-17A is associated with compositional changes in the microbiome i.e., dysbiosis.20–22
DOCK8 is a nucleotide guanine exchange factor (GEF) for the small GTPase cell division control protein 42 (CDC42), which activates Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) to cause actin polymerization, and subsequent cell motility, positioning, and function.23–25 DOCK8 promotes signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation and is important for retinoic acid-related orphan receptor gamma t (RORγt) expression required for the development and survival of RORγt+ group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) and T helper (Th)17 cells.26,27 DOCK8 also promotes IL-2-driven STAT5 activation and thereby T regulatory (Treg) cell function and stability.23,28
DOCK8 deficiency is characterized by recurrent infections, eczema, CD4+ T cell lymphopenia and decreased numbers of circulating Treg cells.29,30 The vast majority of DOCK8-deficient patients (75%–85%) have IgE sensitization to food,31,32 and as many as 50% experience food-induced anaphylaxis.33 This occurs at a substantially higher incidence than in other individuals who have evidence of food sensitization, including patients with atopic dermatitis.34
Here, we report elevated serum levels of MC tryptase in DOCK8-deficient patients. Furthermore, Dock8−/− mice exhibited intestinal MC expansion, elevated serum levels of the mucosal MC (MMC)-derived tryptase, mast cell protease-1 (MCPT-1), increased intestinal permeability, and exaggerated oral anaphylaxis. These events were driven by an intestinal cascade in which dysbiosis with reduced intestinal IL-17 cytokines drove IL-25 production and enhanced Th2 production of IL-4. This shift from Th17 to Th2 cytokine production expanded intestinal MC and exaggerated oral anaphylaxis. DOCK8-deficient Treg cells failed to suppress intestinal IL-4 production and MC expansion, thus allowing unrestrained inflammation. Intervention at several points in the cascade attenuated oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice and have implications for the treatment of food allergy in DOCK8-deficient patients.
RESULTS
Elevated serum MC tryptase levels and increased susceptibility to food anaphylaxis in DOCK8 deficiency
Beta-tryptase (tryptase) is the most abundant mediator stored in the granules of human MCs.35 Serum tryptase levels were examined in 10 patients with DOCK8 deficiency including 6 with documented food allergy. The patients’ age, sex, and DOCK8 mutations are described in Table S1. DOCK8 expression was undetectable in all patients. For at least 1 month prior to the study, none were exposed to offending food allergens or presented food allergy symptoms. Serum tryptase levels were elevated in DOCK8-deficient patients compared with 14 healthy controls (Figure 1A), suggesting that DOCK8-deficient patients have increased MC load and/or activation.
Figure 1. Increased serum levels of MC tryptase in DOCK8-deficient patients and mice and anaphylactic response to oral challenge in adult Dock8−/− mice.

(A) Serum tryptase concentrations in DOCK8-deficient patients (n = 10) and healthy controls (n = 14).
(B) Serum concentrations of MCPT-1 (left) and MCPT-4 (right) in 8-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls, n = 8 mice/group.
(C–E) Response of 6–8-week-old EC sensitized Dock8−/− mice and WT controls to oral antigen challenge. Experimental protocol (C). Change in body temperature 0–60 min after OVA challenge and serum concentrations of MCPT-1 pre-challenge and 60 min after challenge (D). Serum concentrations of IgE anti-OVA (E), n = 5 mice/group.
(F) Response of passively sensitized 6–8-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls to oral antigen challenge. Top: experimental protocol. Bottom: change in body temperature after challenge and serum MCPT-1 pre-challenge and 60 min after, n = 5 mice/group.
(G) Response of passively sensitized 6–8-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls to intraperitoneal (i.p.) antigen challenge. Top: experimental protocol. Bottom: change in body temperature after challenge and serum MCPT-1 pre-challenge and 60 min after challenge, n = 5 mice/group. (C–E) Representative experiment out of 2. (F–G) Representative experiment out of 3. Data presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by t test in (A), (B), (D)–(G) and two-way ANOVA in (D, left) and (F, right).
Differences in genetic background, infections, and exposure to allergens may have contributed to the elevation of serum tryptase levels in the patients. To circumvent these limitations, we examined Dock8−/− mice. The mice had no evidence of infections, skin inflammation, or elevated serum IgE levels.36 Serum levels of MCPT-1, selectively expressed by MMCs, were elevated in 7–9-week-old Dock8−/− mice compared with age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) controls (Figure 1B). In contrast, serum levels of mast cell protease-4 (MCPT-4), selectively expressed by connective tissue MCs (CTMCs), were not elevated (Figure 1B).
Unlike WT BALB/c mice,37 WT C57BL/6 mice epicutaneously (EC) sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) demonstrated little, if any, change in body temperature and a small rise in serum MCPT-1 levels post-oral OVA challenge (Figures 1C and 1D). In contrast, C57BL/6 Dock8−/− mice EC sensitized with OVA had a sustained decrease in body temperature and higher serum MCPT-1 levels post-oral OVA challenge compared with controls (Figure 1D).
WT C57BL/6 mice immunized by oral gavage (o.g.) with OVA and cholera toxin exhibited no changes in body temperature or serum levels of MCPT-1 post-oral OVA challenge (Figures S1A and S1B). In contrast, Dock8−/− mice enterally immunized with OVA had a sustained decrease in body temperature and higher serum MCPT-1 levels post-oral OVA challenge compared with controls (Figure S1B).
Following cutaneous or oral immunization, serum levels of OVA-specific IgE were higher in Dock8−/− mice compared with WT controls (Figures 1E and S1C). Moreover, Dock8−/− mice generate higher-affinity IgE Abs than WT controls following mucosal immunization.38 To determine whether Dock8−/− mice are more susceptible to anaphylaxis following oral antigen challenge independent of the level and affinity of antigen-specific IgE, and differences in the response to active immunization, we examined their response to oral trinitrophenyl-bovine serum albumin (TNP-BSA) challenge following passive sensitization with IgE anti-TNP monoclonal Ab (Figure 1F). Dock8−/− mice had a greater drop in body temperature and higher MCPT-1 serum levels compared with controls (Figure 1F). Passively sensitized Dock8−/− mice and WT controls had comparable decreases in body temperature and serum levels of MCPT-1 following intraperitoneal (i.p.) challenge with TNP-BSA (Figure 1G). We used passive oral anaphylaxis (POA) to dissect the mechanism of increased susceptibility of DOCK8-deficient mice to food allergy.
Dock8−/− mice have increased MC load in the small intestine; however, this expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis is not due to intrinsic DOCK8 deficiency in MCs
Intestinal MCs play a key role in oral anaphylaxis.8 MMCs reside in the epithelial layer and lamina propria (LP) of the intestine and are enriched in the jejunum, whereas CTMCs reside in the intestinal submucosa.39,40 Staining with chloroacetate esterase revealed very few CTMCs in the jejunal submucosa of Dock8−/− mice and WT controls. MMCs were more abundant in the epithelial layer and the underlying LP in Dock8−/− mice compared with controls (Figure 2A). Transcriptomic analysis of jejunal LP cells revealed increased expression of several MC genes including Mcpt1, Mcpt2, Kit, Fcer1a, Ms4a2, Cpa3, and Hpgds (Figure 2B). Increased Mcpt1 expression was verified by qPCR analysis (Figure 2B). The accumulation of MCs in the jejunum of Dock8−/− mice was also assessed by flow cytometry analysis of cells prepared from isolated jejunal LP and jejunal epithelium gating on CD45+CD3−B220−CD11b−CD11c−F4/80−Gr-1−NKp46−c-Kit+IgE+ MCs. The numbers of both LP MCs and intraepithelial MCs were higher in Dock8−/− mice compared with controls (Figures 2C and 2D). The numbers of MCs were not increased in the skin or lungs of Dock8−/− mice (Figure 2E). IgE promotes MC survival.41 Dock8−/−Igh7−/− mice, double deficient in DOCK8 and IgE, demonstrated increased MC load and elevated serum levels of MCPT-1 comparable to Dock8−/− mice (Figure S2A). Thus, MCs selectively expand in the small intestine of Dock8−/− mice independent of IgE.
Figure 2. T cell-driven expansion of jejunal MCs in adult Dock8−/− mice.

(A) Left, representative photomicrographs at 40× magnification of jejunal sections from Dock8−/− mice and WT controls stained with H&E and CAE. MCs stain red (arrows). Scale bar, 150 μm. Right, number of MCs per villus in the jejunum of Dock8−/− mice and controls, n = 7–8 mice/group.
(B) Left, gene expression heatmap of MC genes differentially expressed (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA) by jejunal LP cells from Dock8−/− mice and controls. Heatmap colors indicate log2 fold difference relative to the geometric mean of each row determined by an AmpliSeqRNA transcriptome panel, n = 3 mice/group. Right, qPCR analysis of Mcpt1 in jejunal LP cells. Fold increase of Mcpt1:B2m mRNA relative to mean of controls, n = 4 mice/group.
(C and D) Left, representative flow cytometry plots of surface bound IgE and c-Kit/CD117 expression gating on live CD45+CD3−B220−CD11b−CD11c−F4/80−Gr-1−NKp46− jejunal LP MCs (C) and intraepithelial MCs (D). Right, number of LP MCs (C) and intraepithelial MCs (D) per jejunum from Dock8−/− mice and controls, n = 4–6 mice/group.
(E) Number of MCs in the lung (left) and skin (right) of 8-week-old Dock8−/− mice relative to controls, n = 5–7 mice/group.
(F) Serum concentration of HRP in 8-week-old Dock8−/− mice relative to controls 20 min after oral administration of HRP, n = 7 mice/group.
(G and H) Number of jejunal MCs (G, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (G, right), and POA with drop in body temperature (H, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (H, right) in 8-week-old Mcpt5-CreTgDock8flox/flox mice and controls, n = 5–7 mice/group.
(I and J) Number of jejunal MCs (I, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (I, right), and POA with drop in body temperature (J, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (J, right) in 8-week-old Cd4-CreTgDock8flox/flox mice and controls, n = 4–6 mice/group. Representative experiment out of three is shown for (G)–(J).
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by t test in (A)–(J) and by two-way ANOVA in the left panels of (H) and (J).
Increased intestinal MC load and maturation are associated with increased intestinal permeability to antigen.42 Intestinal permeability was assessed by administering horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to mice by o.g. and measuring serum HRP concentrations 20 min later. Serum HRP levels were higher in Dock8−/− mice compared with WT controls (Figure 2F).
Dock8pri/pri mice express a DOCK8 mutant protein with impaired GEF activity for CDC42.24,43 Dock8pri/pri mice demonstrated increased jejunal MC load and elevated serum MCPT-1 levels, compared with WT controls (Figure S2B). Thus, DOCK8 GEF activity for CDC42 is important for intestinal MC homeostasis.
MC progenitors (MCps), which give rise to CTMCs and MMCs, express Mcpt5.44,45 Dock8 mRNA expression in jejunal LP MCs and intraepithelial MCs was readily detectable in Mcpt5-CreTg mice, but not Mcpt5-CreTg Dock8flox/flox mice (Figure S2C). Jejunal MC numbers, baseline serum MCPT-1 levels, and POA were comparable in 8-week-old Mcpt5-CreTg Dock8flox/flox mice and Mcpt5-CreTg controls (Figures 2G and 2H). In addition, bone marrow-derived MCs (BMMCs) from Dock8−/− mice degranulated normally following FcεRI cross-linking, as measured by surface mobilization of the granule protein, lysosomal-associated membrane protein-1 (LAMP-1) (Figure S2D). These results indicate that intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis of Dock8−/− mice are not due to MC-intrinsic DOCK8-deficiency. In all subsequent experiments, like in this one, baseline and pre-challenge serum MCPT-1 level was measured on the same sample and the value is shown as baseline MCPT-1.
Rag2−/−Dock8−/− mice, which lack mature T and B lymphocytes, had jejunal MCs numbers and serum levels of MCPT-1 comparable to Rag2−/− controls (Figure S2E). Cd4-CreTg Dock8flox/flox mice which selectively lack DOCK8 in T cells, like Dock8−/− mice, demonstrated intestinal MC expansion, increased serum levels of MCPT-1, and enhanced POA compared with Cd4-CreTg controls (Figures 2I and 2J). These results implicate T cells in the intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis of Dock8−/− mice.
Dock8−/− mice have dysbiosis along with increased Th2 cells, ILC2s, and tuft cells, as well as decreased Th17 cells, ILC3s, and expression of antimicrobial genes in the small intestine
Both Th2 cells and ILC2s promote MC proliferation.46 Moreover, administration of IL-4 causes intestinal MC expansion.47 Flow cytometry analysis of jejunal LP cells from 8-week-old mice revealed comparable numbers of CD45+ cells but increased numbers of CD4+ T cells in Dock8−/− mice compared with WT controls (Figures 3A and S3A). The percentage of CD4+Foxp3−GATA-3+ Th2 cells was higher, while the percentage of CD4+Foxp3−RORγt+ Th17 cells was lower in Dock8−/− mice compared with controls (Figure 3A). The percentage CD4+Foxp3−Tbet+ Th1 cells was comparable between the two strains (Figure S3B). As previously reported,27 the numbers of CD45+CD3−CD90.2+ ILCs as well as the percentage of CD45+CD3−CD90.2+RORγt+ ILC3s were markedly lower (Figure 3B). Meanwhile, the percentages of CD45+CD3−CD90.2+Tbet+ ILC1s and CD45+CD3−CD90.2+GATA-3+ ILC2s were higher in Dock8−/− mice compared with controls (Figures 3B and S3C). Transcriptomic analysis of jejunal LP cells revealed increased expression of Il4 and Il13 and decreased expression of Il17a, Il17f, and Il22 in Dock8−/− mice compared to WT controls, while expression of Ifng was comparable (Figure 3C). These results were verified by qPCR (Figure 3C).
Figure 3. Reduced jejunal Th17 and ILC3s, expanded jejunal Th2 cells and ILC2s, and intestinal dysbiosis in adult Dock8−/− mice.

(A and B) Quantification by flow cytometry of cell numbers and percentages in the jejunum of 8-week-old Dock8−/− mice and controls. Number of CD4+ cells and percentage of Th2 and Th17 cells out of CD4+FOXP3− T cells (A). Number of total ILCs and percentages of ILC2s and ILC3s out of total ILCs (B), n = 4 mice/group.
(C) Top, heatmap of cytokine gene expression in the jejunal LP cells of 8-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls, n = 3–4 mice/group. Bottom, cytokine gene expression by qPCR in the LP from Dock8−/− mice and WT controls, n = 3–5 mice/group.
(D) Number of CD45−CD31−EpCam+SiglecF+ tuft cells determined by flow cytometry in the jejunum of 8-week-old Dock8−/− mice and controls. n = 7 mice/group.
(E) Top, heatmap of tuft cell gene expression in the jejunal epithelial layer of 8-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls, n = 3 mice/group. Bottom, Dclk1 and Il25 gene expression by qPCR in jejunal epithelial layer, n = 5–6 mice/group.
(F) Top, heatmap of antimicrobial genes in the jejunal epithelial layer, n = 3 mice/group. Bottom, qPCR analysis of Reg3g1 and Reg3b in the epithelial layer, n = 4–5 mice/group.
(G–I) Gut microbiome analysis in 7–9-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls. Shannon index measurement of alpha-diversity of intestinal microbiome communities (G). Principal-coordinate analysis of beta diversity of microbiome communities measured in Bray-Curtis index, PERMANOVA test, F value = 4.2053, p < 0.003 (H). LEfSe analysis of genus-level taxa significantly enriched in 7–9-week-old Dock8−/− mice and controls, false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p < 0.05 for each of the listed taxa (I).
In (C), (E), and (F), heatmap colors correspond to the log2 fold difference relative to the geometric mean of each row. Gene expression, results are expressed as fold change of the gene of interest:B2m mRNA ratio relative to the mean of WT controls. Representative experiment out of 3 is shown for (A), (B), and (D). Representative experiment of out 2 is shown for (G)–(I). Data presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by t test in (A)–(G).
Intestinal tuft cells are the sole IECs that produce IL-25 (30). They proliferate and produce IL-25 in response to microbial products that include succinate48,49 as well as IL-4 and IL-13.50–52 Flow cytometry analysis of cells from the epithelial layer of the jejunum revealed that the numbers of CD45−CD31−EpCam+SiglecF+ tuft cells were higher in Dock8−/− mice compared with controls (Figure 3D). Transcriptomic analysis of the epithelial cell layer revealed increased expression of the tuft cell genes Siglecf, Dclk1, Pou2f3, Sucnr1, and Il25,53 and qPCR confirmed increased expression of Dclk1 and Il25 (Figure 3E).
IL-17 and IL-22 drive the expression by IECs of antimicrobial peptide (AMP) genes that influence the composition of the microbiome and the inflammatory state of the intestine.19,54 Consistent with the decreased expression of Il17 and Il22 genes in the LP, transcriptome analysis of the epithelial cell layer revealed decreased expression of the antimicrobial genes Reg3b, Reg3g1, Lyz2, and Nos255–57 in Dock8−/− mice compared with WT controls, and the decrease in Reg3b and Reg3g1 was verified by qPCR (Figure 3F).
We performed 16S rRNA composition analysis on stools from 7–9-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT littermates. The intestinal microbiome in Dock8−/− mice showed higher alpha-diversity measured by the Shannon index compared with controls (Figure 3G). Dock8−/− mice and WT controls harbored distinct microbiome compositions, as measured by the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index with different bacterial genera identified by Linear discriminant Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis (Figure 3H). Dock8−/− mice showed enrichment of Candidatus arthromitus (i.e., segmented filamentous bacteria [SFB]), Blautia, Staphylococcus, Coprococcus, and Streptococcus, compared with enrichment of Lactobacillus, Alloprevotella, Parabacteroides, and Turicibacter in WT controls (Figure 3I). Cd4-CreTg Dock8flox/flox mice also demonstrated enrichment of SFB, Coprococcus, Marvinbryantia, and Odoribacter, compared with enrichment of Lactobacillus, Alloprevotella, and Turicibacter in Cd4-CreTg controls (Figure S3D), indicating that DOCK8 deficiency in T cells is likely responsible for alterations in the gut microbiome in Dock8−/− mice.
Decreased intestinal expression of IL-17 cytokines precedes the development of dysbiosis, intestinal MC expansion, and increased type 2 cytokine expression, while reconstitution with type 17 cytokines ameliorates intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice
To define the relationship between altered intestinal cytokine expression, intestinal dysbiosis, and intestinal MC expansion in Dock8−/− mice, we examined mice shortly after weaning. Four-week-old Dock8−/− mice demonstrated no differences in the numbers of intestinal LP MCs or serum levels of MCPT-1 compared with WT controls (Figure 4A). Intestinal expression of Il4, Il13, Ifng, and Il25 was comparable, but intestinal expression of Il17a, Il17f, and Il22 was drastically reduced (Figure 4B). There were no differences in the gut microbiome composition between 4-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls as measured by the Shannon index of alpha-diversity, the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index, or discriminating taxa by LEfSe (Figures S4A–S4C). Thus, type 17 cytokine deficiency precedes intestinal dysbiosis and MC expansion in Dock8−/− mice.
Figure 4. Type 17 cytokine reconstitution or treatment with oral antibiotics starting at 3 weeks of age reverses jejunal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice.

(A) Jejunal MC numbers (left) and serum MCPT-1 (right) in 4-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls, n = 3–6 mice/group.
(B) Cytokine gene expression in the LP (left) and Il25 gene expression in the epithelial layer (right) from the jejunum of 4-week-old Dock8−/− mice and WT controls, n = 3–6 mice/group.
(C–E) Effect of treating 3-week-old Dock8−/− mice with IL-22+IL17A or IgG-Fc for 4 weeks. Number of jejunal MCs determined (C, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (C, right), POA with drop in body temperature (D, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (D, right), and expression of Il25 by the jejunal epithelial layer and Il4 by LP cells (E), n = 4 mice/group.
(F–H) Effect of treating 3.5-week-old Dock8−/− mice with oral antibiotics for 4 weeks versus no treatment. Number of jejunal MCs (F, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (F, right), POA with drop in body temperature (G, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (G, right), and expression of Il25 by the jejunal epithelial layer and Il4 by LP cells (H), n = 3–4 mice/group.
(I–K) Effect of weekly administration for 2 weeks of fecal material from Dock8−/− mice or WT donors to 8-week-old GF WT recipient mice, with analysis performed 1 week after the second transfer. Number of jejunal MCs (I, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (I, right), POA with drop in body temperature (J, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (J, right), and expression of Il25 by the jejunal epithelial layer and Il4 by LP cells (K), n = 4–5 mice/group.
Data shown in (C)–(E) are representative of 4 independent experiments and (F)–(H) are representative of 3 independent experiments. Data shown in (I)–(K) are representative of 2 independent experiments. In (B), (E), (H), and (K) gene expression is shown as fold increase of the cytokine gene:B2m mRNA ratio relative to the mean of controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by t test in (A)–(K) and two-way ANOVA in left panels of (D), (G), and (J).
To determine whether deficiency in type 17 cytokines results in intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice, 15 μg each of recombinant IL-22:IgG-Fc fusion protein (IL-22) and rIL-17A were co-administered i.p. weekly starting at 3–4 weeks of age, and the mice were examined 4 weeks later. Dock8−/− mice treated with IL-22+IL-17A had reduced intestinal MC expansion, serum MCPT-1, and POA compared with Dock8−/− controls treated with immunoglobulin G (IgG)-Fc (Figures 4C and 4D). In addition, they had decreased intestinal expression of Il25 and Il4 (Figure 4E). Three taxa, Turicibacter, Parabacteroides, and Romboutsia, were enriched in the intestinal microbiome of IL-22+IL-17A-treated mice (Figure S4C). As Turicibacter and Parabacteroides were also enriched in WT mice compared with Dock8−/− mice, this suggests protection by these taxa from oral anaphylaxis.
To examine the role of intestinal dysbiosis in intestinal MC expansion in Dock8−/− mice, mice were treated starting at 3–4 weeks of age with antibiotics (ampicillin, vancomycin, neomycin, and metronidazole) added to the drinking water, then examined 4 weeks later. Dock8−/− mice treated with antibiotics had a reduction in jejunal MC load, serum MCPT-1 levels, and POA compared with untreated Dock8−/− controls (Figures 4F and 4G). They also had decreased intestinal Il25 and Il4 expression (Figure 4H). Thus, intestinal dysbiosis drives intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice.
To examine whether intestinal dysbiosis is sufficient to drive intestinal MC expansion in the absence of DOCK8 deficiency, we investigated the impact of fecal material transfer (FMT) from Dock8−/− or WT donors germ-free (GF) WT recipients. Consistent with their previously reported increase in tissue MC numbers and heightened susceptibility to anaphylaxis,58 8-week-old GF WT mice had increased jejunal MCs and a more severe POA compared with WT mice housed under specific-pathogen-free (SPF) conditions (Figures S4D and S4E). Two weeks after FMT from Dock8−/− or WT donors to 8-week-old GF WT recipients, jejunal MC load, serum MCPT-1 levels, and POA were comparable in the two groups (Figures 4I and 4J), Intestinal expression of Il25, but not Il4, was higher in recipients of FMT from Dock8−/− donors (Figure 4K).
IL-25 and T cell-derived IL-4 drive intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice
To determine the role of IL-25 in intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis, 50 μg of anti-IL-25 or IgG1 isotype control was administered i.p. weekly to Dock8−/− mice, starting at 3–4 weeks old for 4 weeks. IL-25 blockade reduced jejunal MC load and serum levels of MCPT-1 and attenuated POA in compared with IgG isotype control (Figures 5A and 5B). IL-25 blockade also reduced jejunal Il4 expression (Figure 5C), suggesting that IL-25 may drive increased intestinal Il4 expression in Dock8−/− mice.
Figure 5. Blockade of IL-25 or IL-4 reverses jejunal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice.

(A–C) Effect of treating 3-week-old Dock8−/− mice with 50 μg anti-IL-25 or IgG1 isotype control weekly for 4 weeks. Number of jejunal MCs (A, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (A, right), POA with drop in body temperature (B, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (B, right), and expression of Il4 by LP cells (C), n = 5 mice/group.
(D–F) Effect of treating 3-week-old Dock8−/− mice with 100 μg of anti-IL-4 or IgG1 isotype control three times a week for 4 weeks. Number of jejunal MCs (D, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (D, right), POA with drop in body temperature (E, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (E, right), and Il4 expression by LP cells (F), n = 3–6 mice/group.
(G–I) Number of jejunal MCs determined by flow cytometry (G, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (G, right), POA with drop in body temperature (H, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (H, right), and Il4 expression by LP cells (I) in 8-week-old Cd4-CreTgIl4-Il13flox/floxDock8−/− mice and Cd4-CreTgIl4-Il13flox/+Dock8−/− controls, n = 3–5 mice/group.
Data in (A)–(C) are representative of 3 independent experiments. Data in (D)–(I) are representative of 2 independent experiments. Gene expression in (C), (F), and (I), results are expressed as fold increase of the Il4:B2m mRNA ratio relative to control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by t test in (A)–(I) and by two-way ANOVA in left panels of (B), (E), and (H).
To determine the role of IL-4, 100 μg of IgG anti-IL-4 or IgG1 isotype control was administered i.p. three times weekly to Dock8−/− mice starting at 3–4 weeks of age for 4 weeks. IL-4 blockade reduced jejunal MC load and serum levels of MCPT-1 and attenuated POA compared with IgG isotype control (Figures 5D and 5E). IL-4 blockade in Dock8−/− mice starting at 8–10 weeks of age for 4 weeks also decreased jejunal MCs, serum MCPT-1 levels, and POA (Figures S5A and S5B), suggesting that IL-4 blockade may be useful in patients with DOCK8 deficiency.
We determined the individual contribution of ILC2s and Th2 cells to the intestinal MC expansion and enhanced oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice. There was no difference in jejunal MC load, serum MCPT-1 levels, POA, or jejunal Il4 expression between RoraCreIl4–13flox/floxDock8−/− mice, which selectively lack IL-4 and IL-13 in ILCs, and RoraCreIl4–13flox/+Dock8−/− controls (Figures S5C–S5E). In contrast, jejunal MC load, serum MCPT-1 levels, and POA were reduced in Cd4-CreTgIl4–13flox/floxDock8−/− mice, which selectively lack IL-4 and IL-13 in T cells, compared with CreTgIl4–13flox/+Dock8−/− controls (Figures 5G–5I). Furthermore, jejunal Il4 expression was lower in Cd4-CreTgIl4–13flox/floxDock8−/− mice compared with controls (Figure 5I). Thus, T cell-derived IL-4 drives intestinal MC expansion and exaggerated anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice.
IL-4 targets MCs to drive intestinal MC expansion to promote oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice
To determine whether IL-4 targets MCs directly to drive their expansion and promote food anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice, we examined Mcpt5-Cre/Il4raflox/flox/Dock8−/− mice, which selectively lack interleukin-4 receptor alpha (IL-4Rα) and thus both type I and type II IL-4 receptors in MCs. IL-4Rα surface expression was not detectable on MCs in the intestinal LP of these mice (Figure S6A). Mcpt5-Cre/Il4raflox/flox/Dock8−/− mice had reduced jejunal MC load, serum MCPT-1 levels, and POA compared with Mcpt5-Cre/Il4raflox/+/Dock8−/− controls (Figures 6A and 6B). Lack of IL-4Rα in the MCs of Dock8−/− mice had no effect on intestinal Il4 expression (Figure 6C). However, it reduced intestinal permeability (Figure 6D), indicating that IL-4 driven MC expansion/activation drives increased intestinal permeability in Dock8−/− mice.
Figure 6. Selective deficiency of IL-4Rα in MCs reverses jejunal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice.

(A–C) Number of jejunal MCs (A, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (A, right), POA with drop in body temperature (B, left) and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (B right), and Il4 expression by LP cells determined by qPCR (C) in 8-week-old Mcpt5-Cre/Il4raflox/floxDock8−/− mice and Mcpt5-Cre/Il4raflox/+Dock8−/− controls, n = 4–6 mice/group.
(D) Serum concentration of HRP in 8-week-old Mcpt5-Cre/Il4raflox/floxDock8−/− mice relative to controls 20 min after oral administration of HRP (D), n = 4–6 mice/group. A representative experiment out of 3 is shown in (A)–(C) and out of 2 for (D). For qPCR analysis, results are expressed as fold change of the Il4:B2m mRNA ratio relative to control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by t test.
IL-4 signaling in Treg cells inhibits the generation of intestinal RORγt+ Treg cells in Dock8−/− mice and promotes intestinal Il4 expression, intestinal MC expansion, and oral anaphylaxis
Treg cells suppress MC proliferation and activation as well as food allergy.59–61 This function is primarily exerted by RORγt+ Treg cells.15 The percentage of CD4+FOXP3+ Treg cells among CD4+ cells, as well as the FOXP3 expression by Treg cells, were decreased in the jejunum of Dock8−/− mice compared with WT controls (Figure 7A). The fraction of RORγt+ Treg cells among jejunal FOXP3+ Treg cells was markedly decreased in Dock8−/− mice compared with WT controls, whereas the fraction of GATA3+ Treg cells was increased (Figure 7B). The intestinal microbiota drive transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 expression by intestinal Treg cells and Treg-derived TGF-β1 drives the differentiation of RORγt+ Treg cells in an autocrine manner.61 Tgfb1, but not Il10 expression, was lower in CD4+GFP+(FOXP3+) Treg cells sorted from the jejunal LP of Foxp3eGFPDock8−/− mice compared with Foxp3eGFP controls (Figure 7C).
Figure 7. Selective deficiency of IL-4R in Tregs reverses jejunal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice.

(A–C) Percentage CD4+FOXP3+ Tregs out of CD4+ T cells (A, left), MFI of FOXP3 expression in Treg cells (A, right), and percentage of GATA-3+ and RORγt+ cells among Tregs (B) in jejunal LP cells from unmanipulated 8-week old WT and Dock8−/− mice. Tgfb1 and Il10 expression by sorted CD4+eGFP+Tregs (C) in the jejunum of 8-week-old Foxp3-eGFP/Dock8−/− mice and Foxp3-eGFP controls, n = 4–7 mice/group.
(D) Representative histograms (left) and percent suppression (right) of IgE-induced surface mobilization of LAMP-1 in BMMCs from Dock8−/− mice and WT controls in the absence or presence of sorted splenic CD4+eGFP(FOXP3)+ Tregs from Foxp3-eGFP/Dock8−/− mice or Foxp3-eGFP controls, n = 4–5 mice/group.
(E–H) Percentage CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs out of CD4+ T cells (E, left) and MFI of FOXP3 expression in Treg cells (E, right), percentage of GATA-3+ and RORγt+ cells among Tregs (F), Tgfb1 expression in sorted YFP+ jejunal CD4+YFP(FOXP3)+ Tregs (G), and suppression of IgE-induced surface mobilization of LAMP-1 in WT BMMCs by sorted splenic CD4+YFP+(FOXP3+) Tregs from Foxp3-YFP-Cre/Il4raflox/floxDock8−/− mice and Foxp3-YFP-Cre/Il4raflox/+ Dock8−/− controls (H), n = 4–5 mice/group.
(I–K) Jejunal MC numbers (I, left), baseline serum MCPT-1 (I, right), POA with drop in body temperature (J, left), and serum MCPT-1 concentrations 60 min post-challenge (J, right), and Il4 expression in LP cells (K) in 8-week-old Foxp3-YFPCre/Il4raflox/floxDock8−/− mice and controls, n = 3–5 mice/group. Data shown are representative of 3 independent experiments in (A)–(K). Gene expression results are expressed as fold change of the cytokine gene:B2m mRNA ratio relative to the mean of controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by t test in (A)–(K).
Treg cell suppression of IgE-mediated MC degranulation is mediated by TGF-β1.61 Sorted CD4+GFP+(FOXP3+) Treg cells from Foxp3eGFPDock8−/− mice and Foxp3eGFP controls were compared for their ability to suppress the degranulation of WT BMMCs preincubated with IgE anti-DNP and challenged with DNP-BSA. Suppression by DOCK8-deficient Treg cells was impaired compared with DOCK8-sufficient WT Treg cells (Figure 7D). BMMCs from Dock8−/− mice were normally susceptible to inhibition of IgE-mediated degranulation by DOCK8-sufficient Treg cells but poorly suppressed by DOCK8-deficient Treg cells (Figure 7D).
IL-4 signaling in Treg cells dampens their Tgfb1 expression and inhibits their differentiation into RORγt+ Treg cells.60,61 We investigated the effect of disrupting IL-4 signaling in the Treg cells of Dock8−/− mice. We compared Foxp3-YFP-Cre/Il4raflox/floxDock8−/− mice, which selectively lack IL-4Rα in Treg cells, to Foxp3-YFP-Cre/Il4raflox/+Dock8−/− controls. IL-4Rα deletion in Treg cells had no effect on the percentage of Treg cells among CD4+ cells in the intestine of Dock8−/− mice or on FOXP3 expression but resulted in a marked increase in the fraction of intestinal RORγt+ Treg cells, with no alteration in the fraction of intestinal GATA3+ Treg cells (Figures 7E and 7F). It also caused increased Tgfb1 expression by intestinal Treg cells with no significant alteration in Il10 expression (Figures 7G and S7A). Further, Treg cells from Foxp3-YFP-Cre/Il4raflox/floxDock8−/− mice demonstrated improved ability to suppress IgE-mediated degranulation of WT BMMCs (Figure 7H). IL-4Rα deletion in Treg cells markedly reduced jejunal MC load and serum MCPT-1 levels (Figure 7I) and attenuated POA in Dock8−/− mice (Figure 7J). It also decreased Il4 expression and the percentage of jejunal CD4+IL-4+ cells (Figures 7K and S7B). Thus, IL-4 signaling impairs the capacity of intestinal Treg cells in Dock8−/− mice to produce TGF-β1, express RORγt, and suppress intestinal IL-4 production, intestinal MC expansion and oral anaphylaxis.
DISCUSSION
We demonstrate that intestinal dysbiosis and insufficient production of IL-17 cytokines synergize with Treg cell dysfunction to drive intestinal MC expansion in DOCK8-deficient mice, thereby increasing intestinal permeability and promoting susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis.
We observed that patients with DOCK8 deficiency who are highly susceptible to food anaphylaxis had elevated levels of serum tryptase. Findings in Dock8−/− mice recapitulated those in the patients. Dock8−/− mice were highly susceptible to oral anaphylaxis following cutaneous, as well as enteric sensitization, demonstrated elevated baseline serum levels of MCPT-1 and developed higher levels of IgE Abs following sensitization compared with WT controls, mirroring the high levels of IgE Abs to food antigens found in DOCK8-deficient patients.62 This may have contributed to the exaggerated oral anaphylaxis in actively sensitized Dock8−/− mice. Following passive sensitization, Dock8−/− mice demonstrated selective susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis independent of the levels and affinity of IgE Ab.
Dock8−/− mice demonstrated increased MC load in the small intestine, but not lungs or skin. This increase involved primarily MMCs located in the small intestinal epithelium and LP and was associated with increased intestinal permeability, which likely contributed to the increased susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis. DOCK8 deficiency in T cells, but not in MCs, was sufficient to cause intestinal MC expansion and increased susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis.
Several immunologic abnormalities were identified in the small intestine of adult Dock8−/− mice, including decreased RORγt+ Th17 cells and ILC3s, increased GATA3+ ILC2s and Th2 cells, decreased expression of Il17a, Il17f, and Il22, and increased expression of Il4 and Il13. The decreased expression of type 17 cytokines is likely due to the role DOCK8 plays in STAT3 activation following T cell receptor (TCR) activation and IL-23R ligation.26,27 It is in line with the previously demonstrated impairment of Th17 differentiation of naive murine and human DOCK8-deficient T cells, decreased numbers of intestinal ILC3s in Dock8pri/pri mice, and diminished numbers of circulating ILC3s in DOCK8-deficient patients.26,27,62,63
Dock8−/− mice demonstrated decreased expression of AMPs in the intestinal epithelial layer and significant shifts in the gut microbiome. These include an increase in SFB similar to IL-17A-deficient mice,21 a decrease in Lactobacillus, thought to protect from food allergy,64 and in Turicibacter, Parabateroides, and Alloprovetella, all of which play an immunoregulatory role.65,66 Moreover, Dock8−/− mice demonstrated increased intestinal tuft cells and Il25 expression, likely driven by the products of a dysbiotic microbiome48 and possibly by elevated intestinal expression of Il4 and Il13.50
Intervening at 3–4 weeks of age, when both intestinal microbiome and intestinal MC load were unperturbed, demonstrated a critical role for type 17 cytokine deficiency as well as intestinal dysbiosis in the intestinal MC expansion and increased susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis of adult Dock8−/− mice and placed IL-17A/IL-22 deficiency and dysbiosis upstream of the increased intestinal expression of Il25 and Il4. Following IL-22 + IL-17A treatment of Dock8−/− mice, Turicibacter, Parabacteroides, and Romboutsia emerged as associated with protection from anaphylaxis. These taxa respectively play a role in bile acid metabolism and protect from intestinal infection,67,68 increase the expression of tight junction proteins, strengthen the gut barrier,69 activate Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)/nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling in IECs, and improve the gut microbiota.70 Future experiments will seek to define the exact mechanisms by which these taxa may protect from oral anaphylaxis. Altogether, the results suggest that intestinal dysbiosis drives intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice. However, FMT from Dock8−/− mice was insufficient to further increase the pre-existing heightened susceptibility phenotype of GF WT mice.
Both IL-25 and IL-4 blockades reduced intestinal MC expansion, attenuated oral anaphylaxis, and reduced intestinal Il4 expression in Dock8−/− mice. Reduction of intestinal Il4 expression by IL-25 blockade strongly suggests that IL-25 drives increased intestinal Il4 expression in Dock8−/− mice. Reduction of Il4 expression by IL-4 blockade is consistent with the critical role IL-4 plays in upregulating its own expression by T cells.71
IL-4 directly targeted MCs to cause their expansion in the intestine of Dock8−/− mice. IL-4Rα deletion in MCs significantly reduced intestinal MC expansion and oral anaphylaxis in Dock8−/− mice. It significantly reduced intestinal permeability in Dock8−/− mice, indicating an important role for IL-4-driven MC activation in the exaggerated oral anaphylaxis in these mice.
Defective Treg cell function played a critical role in the intestinal MC expansion and susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis of Dock8−/− mice. Treg cell number and expression of FOXP3 were decreased in the intestine of these mice. The proportion of GATA3+ Treg cells was increased, whereas the proportion of RORγt+ Treg cells was decreased. Moreover, expression of Tgfb1, the major Tgfb isoform expressed in Treg cells, was decreased. Consistent with the role of Treg-cell-derived TGF-β1 in suppressing MC degranulation,72,73 Treg cells from Dock8−/− mice failed to suppress the degranulation of BMMCs.
IL-4Rα deletion in Treg cells of Dock8−/− mice caused a marked increase in intestinal RORγt+ Treg cells and Tgfb1 expression by intestinal Treg cells in agreement with the observations that IL-4 suppresses Rorc expression and Tgfb gene auto-amplification.74,75 Further, it restored the ability of DOCK8-deficient Treg cells to suppress MC degranulation and reduced intestinal Il4 expression, MC load, serum MCPT-1 levels, and attenuated oral anaphylaxis. Although Th2 skewing is characteristic of DOCK8 deficiency, DOCK8-deficient naive T cells do not exhibit increased Th2 polarization in vitro. In contrast, DOCK8-deficient induced Treg (iTreg) cells display increased instability with IL-4 treatment in vitro and in skin undergoing allergic inflammation.76 Our data strongly suggest that Th2 skewing in DOCK8 deficiency results from defective Treg cell control of the Th2 response. The dysfunction of DOCK8-deficient Treg cells likely involves their inability to make effective contact with their targets as well as impaired IL-2 driven STAT5 phosphorylation and reduced FOXP3 expression as we previously demonstrated.23,24 Subsequent unregulated IL-4 production further aggravates Treg cell dysfunction in a vicious cycle.
In summary, we provide evidence that intestinal dysbiosis and impaired IL-17 cytokine production synergize with Treg cell dysfunction to increase susceptibility to oral anaphylaxis in mice with DOCK8-deficiency. Our findings suggest that reconstitution with type 17 cytokines, non-absorbable antibiotics, and IL-4Rα blockade may help mitigate food anaphylaxis in DOCK8-deficient patients. Some of these strategies could apply to other patients with food allergy and an increased intestinal MC load such as patients with atopic dermatitis.
Limitations of the study
This study does not address the composition of the intestinal microbiome or the cellular and cytokine milieu of the small intestine in patients with DOCK8 deficiency. The role of individual taxa in the intestinal pathology of DOCK8-deficient mice is not defined. The contributions of systemic IL-4 derived fromTh2 cells versus Treg cells to the increased intestinal MC load and susceptibility to anaphylaxis of DOCK8-deficient mice remain unknown. The contribution of the previously demonstrated impaired IL-2-driven STAT5 phosphorylation to the Treg cell dysfunction, which underlies the increased susceptibility of DOCK8-deficient mice to anaphylaxis, as well as whether this susceptibility is reversed by administration of normal Treg cells, needs investigation.
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead contact
Requests for further information and resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Raif S. Geha (raif.geha@childrens.harvard.edu).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Data and code availability
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
STAR★METHODS
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND STUDY PARTICIPANT DETAILS
Sample donors and collection
Plasma was collected after informed consent in a research protocol approved by the Committee on Clinical Investigation at Boston Children’s Hospital and the collaborators’ institutions. DOCK8-deficient patient information is provided in Table S1.
Mice
Dock8−/− and Dock8flox/flox mice were described in references Janssen et al.23,24 Dock8pri/pri mice were a gift from C. Goodnow.24,43 Igh7−/− mice were a gift from H. Oettgen.77 Mcpt5-Cre mice were described in reference Scholten et al.78 Cd4-CreTg mice were from Taconic. Rag2−/− mice were from Taconic. Foxp3-eGFP and Foxp3-YFP-Cre mice were from the Jackson Laboratory. Il4raflox mice were described in reference Herbert et al.79 Il4-Il13flox and Rora-CreTg mice were described in reference Leyva-Castillo et al.80 All transgenic mice, except Igh7−/− mice, were on a C57BL/6 background. WT C57BL6 and BALB/c mice were from the Jackson Laboratory. Both female and male mice were studied with similar results. All mice listed above were kept in an SPF environment with ad libitum access to water and food. WT C57BL6 GF mice were obtained from the Boston Children’s Hospital Animal Research Core and moved to SPF conditions prior to FMT. Mice were studied at 8-weeks of age unless otherwise noted in the text. All mouse studies were approved and performed in accordance with Boston Children’s Hospital and Michigan Medicine Institutional Animal Research and Care Committee.
Primary mouse cell cultures
MCs were cultured from bone marrow collected from 8-week-old mice as detailed in reference Galand et al.81
METHOD DETAILS
Serum concentrations of mast cell tryptases
Concentrations of β-tryptase in human serum and MCPT-1 and MCPT-4 in mouse serum were determined using ELISA commercial kits (EZ0898 from Boster Bio for β-tryptase, 88–7503 from ThermoFisher for MCPT-1, and LS-F44860 from LSBio for MCPT4) and per the manufacturer’s directions.
Anaphylaxis
For active oral anaphylaxis, 8-week-old mice were sensitized epicutaneously (EC) or orally. For EC sensitization, back skin was subjected to six cycles of tape stripping 2 days apart followed by application of 200 μg OVA (A5503, Sigma-Aldrich) or saline secured with a film dressing (TegadermTM, 3M). The skin was tape stripped 6 times in the first cycle and twice in subsequent cycles.82 For oral sensitization, mice were sensitized by gavage of 5 mg of OVA and 10 μg CT (#100B, List Biological Technologies) in 150 μL of PBS weekly for 8 weeks.37 Mice were rested for 7 days after sensitization, then challenged with 150 mg OVA in 200 μL PBS. 24 h before challenge, mice were injected with an implantable temperature transponder (IPTT-300, BioMedic Data Systems). Core body temperatures were measured serially for 60 min after challenge using a DAS-6001 Smart Probe (Bio Medic Data Systems). After 60 min, blood was collected for serum analysis.
For passive oral anaphylaxis, mice were passively sensitized by i.p., injection of 10 μg IgE anti-trinitrophenyl (TNP) monoclonal antibody, a gift from Dr. Fred Finkelman.83 The following day, mice were challenged by oral gavage of 2.5 mg TNP-BSA (T-5050, Bio-search) or i.p. injection of 8 μg TNP-BSA. Temperature monitoring and blood collection were done as detailed above.
Serum concentrations of IgE anti-OVA antibodies
For detection of serum IgE anti-OVA antibodies, 96-well plates (ThermoFisher) were coated overnight at 4°C with rat anti-mouse IgE (clone R35–72, BD Biosciences) at 2 μg/mL overnight. The plate was blocked with 0.5% gelatin for 1 h. Serum samples were incubated for 2 h. Biotinylated-OVA at 12 μg/mL was used for detection. Bound OVA-biotin was detected with avidin-HRP (ThermoFisher) and color change after incubation with TMB substrate (ThermoFisher) was measured using Biotek ELx808 plate reader.
Histology
For chloroacetate esterase (CAE) staining, 1 cm pieces of the mouse mid-jejunum were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour before transfer to PBS. Samples were embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and CAE. CAE+ cells were counted by two blinded investigators. Ten HPFs were counted per slide. Slides were imaged using a bright field microscope (Nikon).
Analysis of gene expression
RNA was isolated using a RNAeasy Plus micro kit (Qiagen). Complementary DNA was reverse transcribed using an iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Biorad). The Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome Mouse Gene Expression Kit was used to prepare bar-coded libraries and sequenced by using an Ion S5 next-generation sequencer. The AmpliSeqRNA plug-in (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used to calculate differential gene expression analysis. qPCR was performed with TaqMan Universal Master Mix II, no UNG, and TaqMan Probes (all from Life Technologies) using a QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher). Gene expression was normalized to β2-microglobulin. Relative mRNA expression was quantified using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Jejunal, lung and skin cell suspensions
Cells were isolated from the jejunum as previously described.81 Briefly, the jejuna were harvested and flushed with PBS and 2% fetal calf serum (FCS) before being cut longitudinally and into 1 cm segments. The pieces were incubated in HBSS supplemented with 10 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM DTE, and 0.5% FCS shaking at 37°C for 40 min. Epithelial cells were collected from the supernatant and digested with Liberase DL (Roche) and DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich). Tissue pieces were then digested in HBSS with 20% FCS and 100 U/ml of collagenase VIII (Sigma-Aldrich) with shaking at 37°C for 30 min. Immune cells from the LP were further purified on a 40% Percoll gradient (GE Healthcare). To isolate cells from the lungs, single cell suspensions were generated by gently disrupting tissue between two frosted slides (VWR). Cells were then passed through a 70 μm cell strainer. For skin cell suspensions, 1 cm2 skin pieces were obtained and cell isolation was performed as we previously described.84
Flow cytometry
Cell suspensions were washed, incubated with TruStain FcX (anti-CD19/CD32, Biolegend) and eF506 viability dye (ThermoFisher) to exclude dead cells. Monoclonal antibodies to the following cell surface antigens were used for flow cytometry as detailed in the key resource table. For intracellular staining cells were fixed and permeabilized using the eBioscience Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (ThermoFisher). All data was acquired on a BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences). Analyses were performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc.).
KEY RESOURCES TABLE.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Antibodies | ||
|
| ||
| IgE anti-trinitrophenyl | Gift from Dr. Fred Finkelman (Cincinnati Children's Hospital) | N/A |
| mouse IgE | BD Biosciences | Cat#564207; RRID: AB_2738668 |
| mouse IL-25 | Biolegend | Cat# 514401; RRID: AB_2043954 |
| IgG1 isotype control | BioXCell | Cat# BE0088; RRID: AB_1107775 |
| mouse IL-4 | BioXCell | Cat# BE0045; RRID: AB_1107707 |
| mouse IgE DNP | Sigma-Aldrich | SPE-7/Cat# D8406 |
| TruStain FcX (mouse CD19/CD32) | Biolegend | Cat# 101320; AB_1574975 |
| mouse CD11b | BD Biosciences | Cat# 553309; RRID: AB_394773 |
| mouse CD11c | Biolegend | Cat# 117303; RRID: AB_313772 |
| mouse F4/80 | Biolegend | Cat# 123105; RRID: AB_893499 |
| mouse/human B220 | Biolegend | Cat# 103204; RRID: AB_312989 |
| mouse Gr-1 | Biolegend | Cat# 108403; RRID: AB_313368 |
| mouse NKp46 | Biolegend | Cat# 137615; RRID: AB_11219387 |
| mouse CD3 | Biolegend | Cat# 100243; RRID: AB_2563946 |
| mouse IgE | Biolegend | Cat# 406907; RRID: AB_493291 |
| CD45 | Biolegend | Cat# 103116; RRID: AB_312981 |
| CD117 (c-kit) | Biolegend | Cat# 105811; RRID: AB_313220 |
| Siglec-F | BD Pharmingen | Cat# 552126; RRID: AB_394341 |
| CD31 | Biolegend | Cat# 102419; RRID: AB_10612742 |
| EpCAM | Biolegend | Cat# 118215; RRID: AB_1236477 |
| CD45 | Biolegend | Cat# 103112; RRID: AB_312977 |
| GATA-3 | Thermo Fisher | Cat# 53-9966-42; RRID: AB_2574493 |
| RORgt | Thermo Fisher | Cat# 12-6981-82; RRID: AB_10807092 |
| CD3 | Thermo Fisher | Cat# 46-0032-80; RRID: AB_1834428 |
| CD90.2 | Biolegend | Cat# 105324; RRID: AB_2201291 |
| CD4 | Biolegend | Cat# 100451; RRID: AB_2564591 |
| Foxp3 | Thermo Fisher | FJK-16s/17-5773-82 |
| T-bet | Biolegend | Cat# 644815; RRID: AB_10896427 |
| CD107a (LAMP-1) | Biolegend | Cat# 121618; RRID: AB_2749905 |
|
| ||
| Biological samples | ||
|
| ||
| Human plasma samples | Samples were collected after informed consent in a research protocol approved by the Committee on Clinical Investigation at Boston Children’s Hospital and the collaborators’ institutions. | N/A |
|
| ||
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
|
| ||
| ovalbumin | Sigma-Aldrich | A5503 |
| cholera toxin | ListBiological Technologies | #100B |
| trinitrophenyl-bovine serum albumin (TNP-BSA) | Biosearch | T-5050 |
| avidin-HRP | Thermo Fisher | 18-4200-89 |
| TMB substrate | ThermoFisher | N301 |
| Liberase DL | Roche | 5989132001 |
| DNase I | Sigma-Aldrich | DN25 |
| Percoll | GE Healthcare | 17089101 |
| viability dye | Thermo Fisher | 65-0866 |
| eBioscience Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set | Thermo Fisher | 00-5523-00 |
| horseradish peroxidase | Sigma-Aldrich | P6782 |
| QuantaBlu Fluorogenic peroxidase substrate | Thermo Fisher | 15169 |
| recombinant mouse IL-22 | R&D systems | 582 |
| recombinant mouse IL-17A | R&D systems | 7956 |
| mouse IgG2a Fc protein | BioXCell | BE0097 |
| ampicillin | Sigma-Aldrich | A9518 |
| vancomycin | Sigma-Aldrich | V2002 |
| neomycin | Sigma-Aldrich | PHR1491 |
| metronidazole | Sigma-Aldrich | M1547 |
| DNP albumin | Sigma-Aldrich | A6661 |
| anti-mouse CD3/CD28 coated beads | ThermoFisher | 11452 |
|
| ||
| Critical commercial assays | ||
|
| ||
| Human tryptase/TPSAB1/B2 ELISA kit | Boster Bio | EZ0898 |
| mouse MCPT1 ELISA | Thermo Fisher | 88-7503 |
| mouse MCPT4 ELISA | LSBio | LS-F44860 |
| RNAeasy micro kit | Qiagen | 74004 |
| iScript cDNA synthesis kit | Biorad | 1708890 |
| The Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome Mouse Gene Expression Kit | Thermo Fisher | A36553 |
| TaqMan Universal Master Mix II, no UNG | Thermo Fisher | 4440043 |
| ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit | Zymo Research | D4300 |
| Platinum SuperFi DNA Polymerase | Invitrogen | 12351010 |
|
| ||
| Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
|
| ||
| Mouse: Dock8-/- | N/A | |
| Mouse: Dock8flox/flox | N/A | |
| Mouse: Dock8pri/pri | Gift from Dr. Christopher Goodnow (Garvan Institute of Medical Research) | N/A |
| Mouse: Igh7-/- | Gift from Dr. Hans Oettgen (Boston Children’s Hospital) | N/A |
| Mouse: Mcpt5-Cre | Gift from Dr. Axel Roers Cologne, Germany | N/A |
| Mouse: CD4-CreTg | Taconic | RRID:IMSR_TAC:4196 |
| Mouse: Rag2-/- | Taconic | RRID:IMSR_TAC:RAG2 |
| Mouse: Foxp3-eGFP | Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_JAX:023800 |
| Mouse: Foxp3-YFP-Cre | Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_JAX:016959 |
| Mouse: Il4-Il13flox/flox | Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_JAX:015859 |
| Mouse: Rora-CreTg | Gift from Dr. Dennis O’Leary, California, USA | N/A |
| Mouse: C57BL/6N | Charles River | RRID:MGI:2159965 |
| Mouse: Balb/c | Charles River | RRID:MGI:2161072 |
|
| ||
| Oligonucleotides | ||
|
| ||
| B2m Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00437762_m1 |
| Il4 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00445259_m1 |
| Il13 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00434204_m1 |
| Mcpt1 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00656886_g1 |
| Il17a Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00439618_m1 |
| Il17f Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00521423_m1 |
| Il22 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00444241_m1 |
| Ifng Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm01168134_m1 |
| Dclk1 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm01284845_m1 |
| Il25 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00499822_m1 |
| Reg3b Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00440616_g1 |
| Reg3g1 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm00441127_m1 |
| Tgfb1 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm01178820_m1 |
| Il10 Taqman Assays | Thermo Fisher | Mm01288386_m1 |
|
| ||
| Software and algorithms | ||
|
| ||
| FlowJo | Tree Star, Inc | Version 10.8 |
| Prism | GraphPad | Version 10 |
| MicrobiomeAnalyst | N/A | https://www.microbiomeanalyst.ca/ |
Intestinal permeability
Mice were gavaged with 400 μl of 5 mg/ml HRP (Sigma-Aldrich). Blood was obtained 20 min after gavage. Serum HRP content was measured by incubation with QuantaBlu Fluorogenic peroxidase substrate (ThermoFisher). Fluorescence intensity was measured by a BMG LABTECH FLUOstar Omega reader.
Microbiome analysis
Stool samples from 8–10 week-old mice were acquired in the middle of the light period. Samples were immediately placed on dry ice and frozen at −80°C for storage. Genomic DNA was extracted from stools using ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Cat D4300) and 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 region was amplified using Platinum SuperFi DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen, Cat 12351010) and primers with annealing sequences 5’-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’ and 5’-GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’. Amplicon sequencing was performed in 300 bp paired-end using Miseq v3 platform, and amplicon sequence variant (ASV) table was generated using a previous bioinformatics pipeline.85 Alpha-diversity, beta-diversity and bacterial genera with differential abundances were analyzed using MicrobiomeAnalyst.86
Treatment with IL-22 +IL-17A, anti-IL-25, IL and anti-IL-4
Three-week-old Dock8−/− mice were treated for 4 weeks prior to analysis. One set was i.p. injected weekly with 15 μg of IL-22-Fc (582, R&D systems) and IL-17A (7956, R&D systems) or IgG2a Fc protein (BE0097, BioXCell). Another set was i.p. injected weekly with 50 μg anti-IL25 (clone 35B, BioLegend) or rat IgG1 isotype control (BE0088, BioXCell). A third set was i.p. injected 3 times per week i.p. with 100 μg anti-IL4 (11B11, BioXCell), or IgG1 isotype control. 8–10 week old mice were also injected with anti-IL4 as detailed above.
Oral antibiotics treatment
At 3.5-weeks of age, mice were weaned and given water supplemented with 1 g/L ampicillin, 500 mg/L vancomycin, 1 g/L neomycin, and 1 g/L metronidazole (all from Sigma) for 4 weeks.
Fecal material transplantation
Mouse stool samples were acquired in the middle of the light period. For FMT, each fecal pellet was solubilized in 150 μl of PBS and kept on ice. The equivalent of 2 pellets were combined and gavaged into each GF recipient mouse within 60 min of fecal collection. After FMT, recipient mice were kept under SPF conditions with autoclaved food and bedding. Repeat FMT was done at 1 week later and the mice were analyzed at 2 weeks
LAMP-1 mobilization by BMMCs
BMMCs were incubated with 5–50 ng/ml of anti-DNP IgE (clone SPE-7, Sigma-Aldrich). After 24 h, BMMCs were stimulated with 0–100 ng/ml DNP albumin (Sigma Aldrich) and stained for surface LAMP-1 using a PE-conjugated anti-LAMP Ab (clone 1D4B, Biolegend). After 10 min, samples were washed with ice cold PBS with 0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Treg cell suppression of MC degranulation
For Treg cell suppression of BMMC degranulation, CD4+CD25+eGFP+ Treg cells were sorted from Foxp3-eGFP and Foxp3-eGFP/Dock8−/− mice using an MA900 Cell Sorter (Sony). Treg cells were added at equal numbers to BMMCs along with anti-CD3+anti-CD28 coated beads (11452, ThermoFisher) and IgE anti-DNP mAb. 24 hours later, BMMCs were stimulated with 50 ng/ml DNP albumin (Sigma Aldrich) and analyzed by flow cytometry as detailed above.
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Comparisons were analyzed for statistical significance using unpaired two tailed Student’s t test, two-way ANOVA, and Mann-Whitney U test to determine the p value using Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Supplementary Material
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2025.06.004.
Highlights.
DOCK8 deficiency is linked with food allergy and elevated serum tryptase levels
DOCK8-deficient mice exhibit oral anaphylaxis and expanded mucosal mast cells (MMCs)
IL-4-driven MC expansion results from reduced intestinal Th17 cells and dysbiosis
DOCK8-deficient Treg cells fail to suppress intestinal IL-4 production and MC expansion
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dr. Hans Oettgen for his useful discussions and providing the Igh7−/− mice and Dr. Christopher Goodnow for providing the Dock8pri/pri mice. This research is supported by NIH R01AI114588 (to R.S.G.) and R01AI126915 and R01AI158814 (to T.A.C. and S.R.-N.). The graphical abstract was created with BioRender.com.
Footnotes
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gupta RS, Warren CM, Smith BM, Blumenstock JA, Jiang J, Davis MM, and Nadeau KC (2019). The Public Health Impact of Parent-Reported Childhood Food Allergies in the United States. Pediatrics 142, e20181235. 10.1542/peds.2018-1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gupta RS, Springston EE, Warrier MR, Smith B, Kumar R, Pongracic J, and Holl JL (2011). The prevalence, severity, and distribution of childhood food allergy in the United States. Pediatrics 128, e9–e17. 10.1542/peds.2011-0204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu AH, Jaramillo R, Sicherer SH, Wood RA, Bock SA, Burks AW, Massing M, Cohn RD, and Zeldin DC (2010). National prevalence and risk factors for food allergy and relationship to asthma: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2006. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 126, 798–806.e14. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lack G, Fox D, Northstone K, and Golding J; Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Study Team. (2003). Factors Associated with the Development of Peanut Allergy in Childhood. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 977–985. 10.1056/NEJMoa013536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Noti M, Kim BS, Siracusa MC, Rak GD, Kubo M, Moghaddam AE, Sattentau QA, Comeau MR, Spergel JM, and Artis D (2014). Exposure to food allergens through inflamed skin promotes intestinal food allergy through the thymic stromal lymphopoietin-basophil axis. e1391–1396. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 133, 1390–1399.e6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ling Z, Li Z, Liu X, Cheng Y, Luo Y, Tong X, Yuan L, Wang Y, Sun J, Li L, and Xiang C (2014). Altered fecal microbiota composition associated with food allergy in infants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 2546–2554. 10.1128/AEM.00003-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee H, Park JH, Park DI, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, Kim BI, and Chae SW (2013). Mucosal mast cell count is associated with intestinal permeability in patients with diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 19, 244–250. 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.2.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ahrens R, Osterfeld H, Wu D, Chen CY, Arumugam M, Groschwitz K, Strait R, Wang YH, Finkelman FD, and Hogan SP (2012). Intestinal mast cell levels control severity of oral antigen-induced anaphylaxis in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 180, 1535–1546. 10.1016/j.aj-path.2011.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saavedra Y, and Vergara P (2005). Hypersensitivity to ovalbumin induces chronic intestinal dysmotility and increases the number of intestinal mast cells. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 17, 112–122. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Galli SJ, and Tsai M (2012). IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat. Med. 18, 693–704. 10.1038/nm.2755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Noval Rivas M, Burton OT, Wise P, Zhang YQ, Hobson SA, Garcia Lloret M, Chehoud C, Kuczynski J, DeSantis T, Warrington J, et al. (2013). A microbiota signature associated with experimental food allergy promotes allergic sensitization and anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 131, 201–212. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Plunkett CH, and Nagler CR (2017). The Influence of the Microbiome on Allergic Sensitization to Food. J. Immunol. 198, 581–589. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao W, Ho HE, and Bunyavanich S (2019). The gut microbiome in food allergy. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 122, 276–282. 10.1016/j.anai.2018.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feehley T, Plunkett CH, Bao R, Choi Hong SM, Culleen E, Belda-Ferre P, Campbell E, Aitoro R, Nocerino R, Paparo L, et al. (2019). Healthy infants harbor intestinal bacteria that protect against food allergy. Nat. Med. 25, 448–453. 10.1038/s41591-018-0324-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abdel-Gadir A, Stephen-Victor E, Gerber GK, Noval Rivas M, Wang S, Harb H, Wang L, Li N, Crestani E, Spielman S, et al. (2019). Microbiota therapy acts via a regulatory T cell MyD88/RORγt pathway to suppress food allergy. Nat. Med. 25, 1164–1174. 10.1038/s41591-019-0461-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu HJ, and Wu E (2012). The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity. Gut Microbes 3, 4–14. 10.4161/gmic.19320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ivanov II, Atarashi K, Manel N, Brodie EL, Shima T, Karaoz U, Wei D, Goldfarb KC, Santee CA, Lynch SV, et al. (2009). Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 139, 485–498. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shaw MH, Kamada N, Kim YG, and Núñez G (2012). Microbiota-induced IL-1beta, but not IL-6, is critical for the development of steady-state TH17 cells in the intestine. J. Exp. Med. 209, 251–258. 10.1084/jem.20111703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dixon BREA, Radin JN, Piazuelo MB, Contreras DC, and Algood HMS (2016). IL-17a and IL-22 Induce Expression of Antimicrobials in Gastrointestinal Epithelial Cells and May Contribute to Epithelial Cell Defense against Helicobacter pylori. PLoS One 11, e0148514. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zheng Y, Valdez PA, Danilenko DM, Hu Y, Sa SM, Gong Q, Abbas AR, Modrusan Z, Ghilardi N, de Sauvage FJ, and Ouyang W (2008). Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat. Med. 14, 282–289. 10.1038/nm1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kumar P, Monin L, Castillo P, Elsegeiny W, Horne W, Eddens T, Vikram A, Good M, Schoenborn AA, Bibby K, et al. (2016). Intestinal Interleukin-17 Receptor Signaling Mediates Reciprocal Control of the Gut Microbiota and Autoimmune Inflammation. Immunity 44, 659–671. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bi Y, Li C, Liu L, Zhou J, Li Z, Deng H, Wu C, Han Y, Song Y, Tan Y, et al. (2017). IL-17A-dependent gut microbiota is essential for regulating diet-induced disorders in mice. Sci. Bull. (Beijing) 62, 1052–1063. 10.1016/j.scib.2017.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Janssen E, Kumari S, Tohme M, Ullas S, Barrera V, Tas JM, Castillo-Rama M, Bronson RT, Usmani SM, Irvine DJ, et al. (2017). DOCK8 enforces immunological tolerance by promoting IL-2 signaling and immune synapse formation in Tregs. JCI Insight 2, e94298. 10.1172/jci.insight.94298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Janssen E, Tohme M, Hedayat M, Leick M, Kumari S, Ramesh N, Massaad MJ, Ullas S, Azcutia V, Goodnow CC, et al. (2016). A DOCK8-WIP-WASp complex links T cell receptors to the actin cytoskeleton. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 3837–3851. 10.1172/JCI85774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang Q, Dove CG, Hor JL, Murdock HM, Strauss-Albee DM, Garcia JA, Mandl JN, Grodick RA, Jing H, Chandler-Brown DB, et al. (2014). DOCK8 regulates lymphocyte shape integrity for skin antiviral immunity. J. Exp. Med. 211, 2549–2566. 10.1084/jem.20141307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Keles S, Charbonnier LM, Kabaleeswaran V, Reisli I, Genel F, Gulez N, Al-Herz W, Ramesh N, Perez-Atayde A, Karaca NE, et al. (2016). Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 regulates signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation and promotes TH17 cell differentiation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 138, 1384–1394.e2. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Singh AK, Eken A, Fry M, Bettelli E, and Oukka M (2014). DOCK8 regulates protective immunity by controlling the function and survival of RORγt+ ILCs. Nat. Commun. 5, 4603. 10.1038/ncomms5603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Singh AK, Eken A, Hagin D, Komal K, Bhise G, Shaji A, Arkatkar T, Jackson SW, Bettelli E, Torgerson TR, and Oukka M (2017). DOCK8 regulates fitness and function of regulatory T cells through modulation of IL-2 signaling. JCI Insight 2, e94275. 10.1172/jci.insight.94275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Oh J, Freeman AF, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Park M, Sokolic R, Candotti F, Holland SM, Segre JA, and Kong HH. (2013). The altered landscape of the human skin microbiome in patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Genome Res. 23, 2103–2114. 10.1101/gr.159467.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chu EY, Freeman AF, Jing H, Cowen EW, Davis J, Su HC, Holland SM, and Turner MLC (2012). Cutaneous manifestations of DOCK8 deficiency syndrome. Arch. Dermatol. 148, 79–84. 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aydin SE, Kilic SS, Aytekin C, Kumar A, Porras O, Kainulainen L, Kostyuchenko L, Genel F, Kütükcüler N, Karaca N, et al. (2015). DOCK8 deficiency: clinical and immunological phenotype and treatment options - a review of 136 patients. J. Clin. Immunol. 35, 189–198. 10.1007/s10875-014-0126-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Haskologlu S, Kostel Bal S, Islamoglu C, Aytekin C, Guner S, Sevinc S, Keles S, Kendirli T, Ceylaner S, Dogu F, and Ikinciogullari A (2020). Clinical, immunological features and follow up of 20 patients with dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 31, 515–527. 10.1111/pai.13236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Su HC, Jing H, Angelus P, and Freeman AF (2019). Insights into immunity from clinical and basic science studies of DOCK8 immunodeficiency syndrome. Immunol. Rev. 287, 9–19. 10.1111/imr.12723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chang A, Robison R, Cai M, and Singh AM (2016). Natural History of Food-Triggered Atopic Dermatitis and Development of Immediate Reactions in Children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 4, 229–236.e1. 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pejler G, Rönnberg E, Waern I, and Wernersson S (2010). Mast cell proteases: multifaceted regulators of inflammatory disease. Blood 115, 4981–4990. 10.1182/blood-2010-01-257287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wilkie H, Das M, Pelovitz T, Bainter W, Woods B, Alasharee M, Sobh A, Baris S, Eltan SB, Al-Herz W, et al. (2024). Regulatory T-cell dysfunction and cutaneous exposure to Staphylococcus aureus underlie eczema in DOCK8 deficiency. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 154, 143–156. 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bartnikas LM, Gurish MF, Burton OT, Leisten S, Janssen E, Oettgen HC, Beaupré J, Lewis CN, Austen KF, Schulte S, et al. (2013). Epicutaneous sensitization results in IgE-dependent intestinal mast cell expansion and food-induced anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 131, 451–460.e6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gowthaman U, Chen JS, Zhang B, Flynn WF, Lu Y, Song W, Joseph J, Gertie JA, Xu L, Collet MA, et al. (2019). Identification of a T follicular helper cell subset that drives anaphylactic IgE. Science 365, eaaw6433. 10.1126/science.aaw6433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Galli SJ, Tsai M, Marichal T, Tchougounova E, Reber LL, and Pejler G (2015). Approaches for analyzing the roles of mast cells and their proteases in vivo. Adv. Immunol. 126, 45–127. 10.1016/bs.ai.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gurish MF, and Austen KF (2012). Developmental origin and functional specialization of mast cell subsets. Immunity 37, 25–33. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Asai K, Kitaura J, Kawakami Y, Yamagata N, Tsai M, Carbone DP, Liu FT, Galli SJ, and Kawakami T (2001). Regulation of mast cell survival by IgE. Immunity 14, 791–800. 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00157-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Groschwitz KR, and Hogan SP (2009). Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis. 21–22. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 124, 3–20. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Randall KL, Lambe T, Johnson AL, Treanor B, Kucharska E, Domaschenz H, Whittle B, Tze LE, Enders A, Crockford TL, et al. (2009). Dock8 mutations cripple B cell immunological synapses, germinal centers and long-lived antibody production. Nat. Immunol. 10, 1283–1291. 10.1038/ni.1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dahlin JS, Ding Z, and Hallgren J (2015). Distinguishing Mast Cell Progenitors from Mature Mast Cells in Mice. Stem Cells Dev. 24, 1703–1711. 10.1089/scd.2014.0553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gurish MF, and Boyce JA (2006). Mast cells: ontogeny, homing, and recruitment of a unique innate effector cell. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 117, 1285–1291. 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Licona-Limón P, Kim LK, Palm NW, and Flavell RA (2013). TH2, allergy and group 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 14, 536–542. 10.1038/ni.2617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Burton OT, Darling AR, Zhou JS, Noval-Rivas M, Jones TG, Gurish MF, Chatila TA, and Oettgen HC (2013). Direct effects of IL-4 on mast cells drive their intestinal expansion and increase susceptibility to anaphylaxis in a murine model of food allergy. Mucosal Immunol. 6, 740–750. 10.1038/mi.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fung C, Fraser LM, Barrón GM, Gologorsky MB, Atkinson SN, Gerrick ER, Hayward M, Ziegelbauer J, Li JA, Nico KF, et al. (2023). Tuft cells mediate commensal remodeling of the small intestinal antimicrobial landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2216908120. 10.1073/pnas.2216908120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kellogg TD, Ceglia S, Mortzfeld BM, Tanna TM, Zeamer AL, Mancini MR, Foley SE, Ward DV, Bhattarai SK, McCormick BA, et al. (2025). Succinate-producing microbiota drives tuft cell hyperplasia to protect against Clostridioides difficile. J. Exp. Med. 222, e20232055. 10.1084/jem.20232055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gerbe F, Sidot E, Smyth DJ, Ohmoto M, Matsumoto I, Dardalhon V, Cesses P, Garnier L, Pouzolles M, Brulin B, et al. (2016). Intestinal epithelial tuft cells initiate type 2 mucosal immunity to helminth parasites. Nature 529, 226–230. 10.1038/nature16527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.von Moltke J, Ji M, Liang HE, and Locksley RM (2016). Tuft-cell-derived IL-25 regulates an intestinal ILC2-epithelial response circuit. Nature 529, 221–225. 10.1038/nature16161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Howitt MR, Lavoie S, Michaud M, Blum AM, Tran SV, Weinstock JV, Gallini CA, Redding K, Margolskee RF, Osborne LC, et al. (2016). Tuft cells, taste-chemosensory cells, orchestrate parasite type 2 immunity in the gut. Science 351, 1329–1333. 10.1126/science.aaf1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ting HA, and von Moltke J (2019). The Immune Function of Tuft Cells at Gut Mucosal Surfaces and Beyond. J. Immunol. 202, 1321–1329. 10.4049/jimmunol.1801069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kolls JK, McCray PB Jr., and Chan YR (2008). Cytokine-mediated regulation of antimicrobial proteins. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 829–835. 10.1038/nri2433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vaishnava S, Yamamoto M, Severson KM, Ruhn KA, Yu X, Koren O, Ley R, Wakeland EK, and Hooper LV (2011). The antibacterial lectin RegIIIgamma promotes the spatial segregation of microbiota and host in the intestine. Science 334, 255–258. 10.1126/science.1209791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fricke WF, Song Y, Wang AJ, Smith A, Grinchuk V, Mongodin E, Pei C, Ma B, Lu N, Urban JF Jr., et al. (2015). Type 2 immunity-dependent reduction of segmented filamentous bacteria in mice infected with the helminthic parasite Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Microbiome 3, 40. 10.1186/s40168-015-0103-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hokari R, Kato S, Matsuzaki K, Kuroki M, Iwai A, Kawaguchi A, Nagao S, Miyahara T, Itoh K, Sekizuka E, et al. (2001). Reduced sensitivity of inducible nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice to chronic colitis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 31, 153–163. 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00565-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cahenzli J, Köller Y, Wyss M, Geuking MB, and McCoy KD (2013). Intestinal microbial diversity during early-life colonization shapes long-term IgE levels. Cell Host Microbe 14, 559–570. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gri G, Piconese S, Frossi B, Manfroi V, Merluzzi S, Tripodo C, Viola A, Odom S, Rivera J, Colombo MP, and Pucillo CE (2008). CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress mast cell degranulation and allergic responses through OX40-OX40L interaction. Immunity 29, 771–781. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Noval Rivas M, Burton OT, Wise P, Charbonnier LM, Georgiev P, Oettgen HC, Rachid R, and Chatila TA (2015). Regulatory T cell reprogramming toward a Th2-cell-like lineage impairs oral tolerance and promotes food allergy. Immunity 42, 512–523. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Turner JA, Stephen-Victor E, Wang S, Rivas MN, Abdel-Gadir A, Harb H, Cui Y, Fanny M, Charbonnier LM, Hung Fong JJ, et al. (2020). Regulatory T Cell-Derived TGF-beta1 Controls Multiple Checkpoints Governing Allergy and Autoimmunity. Immunity 53, 1331–1332. 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tangye SG, Pillay B, Randall KL, Avery DT, Phan TG, Gray P, Ziegler JB, Smart JM, Peake J, Arkwright PD, et al. (2017). Dedicator of cytokinesis 8–deficient CD4+ T cells are biased to a TH2 effector fate at the expense of TH1 and TH17 cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 139, 933–949. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Eken A, Cansever M, Okus FZ, Erdem S, Nain E, Azizoglu ZB, Haliloglu Y, Karakukcu M, Ozcan A, Devecioglu O, et al. (2020). ILC3 deficiency and generalized ILC abnormalities in DOCK8-deficient patients. Allergy 75, 921–932. 10.1111/all.14081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ribeiro JF, and Pedrosa C (2024). Probiotics, prebiotics and food allergy: a review. Eur. Ann. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 56, 99–110. 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fu G, Zhao K, Chen H, Wang Y, Nie L, Wei H, and Wan C (2019). Effect of 3 lactobacilli on immunoregulation and intestinal microbiota in a beta-lactoglobulin-induced allergic mouse model. J. Dairy Sci. 102, 1943–1958. 10.3168/jds.2018-15683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ouwehand AC (2007). Antiallergic effects of probiotics1. J. Nutr. 137, 794S–797S. 10.1093/jn/137.3.794S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hoek KL, McClanahan KG, Latour YL, Shealy N, Piazuelo MB, Vallance BA, Byndloss MX, Wilson KT, and Olivares-Villagómez D (2023). Turicibacterales protect mice from severe Citrobacter rodentium infection. Infect. Immun. 91, e0032223. 10.1128/iai.00322-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lynch JB, Gonzalez EL, Choy K, Faull KF, Jewell T, Arellano A, Liang J, Yu KB, Paramo J, and Hsiao EY (2023). Gut microbiota Turicibacter strains differentially modify bile acids and host lipids. Nat. Commun. 14, 3669. 10.1038/s41467-023-39403-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Koh GY, Kane AV, Wu X, and Crott JW (2020). Parabacteroides distasonis attenuates tumorigenesis, modulates inflammatory markers and promotes intestinal barrier integrity in azoxymethane-treated A/J mice. Carcinogenesis 41, 909–917. 10.1093/carcin/bgaa018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Song B, Sun P, Kong L, Xiao C, Pan X, and Song Z (2024). The improvement of immunity and activation of TLR2/NF-κB signaling pathway by Romboutsia ilealis in broilers. J. Anim. Sci. 102, skae286. 10.1093/jas/skae286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kienzle N, Olver S, Buttigieg K, Groves P, Janas ML, Baz A, and Kelso A (2005). Progressive differentiation and commitment of CD8+ T cells to a poorly cytolytic CD8low phenotype in the presence of IL-4. J. Immunol. 174, 2021–2029. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ndaw VS, Abebayehu D, Spence AJ, Paez PA, Kolawole EM, Taruselli MT, Caslin HL, Chumanevich AP, Paranjape A, Baker B, et al. (2017). TGF-beta1 Suppresses IL-33-Induced Mast Cell Function. J. Immunol. 199, 866–873. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Turner JA, Stephen-Victor E, Wang S, Rivas MN, Abdel-Gadir A, Harb H, Cui Y, Fanny M, Charbonnier LM, Fong JJH, et al. (2020). Regulatory T Cell-Derived TGF-beta1 Controls Multiple Checkpoints Governing Allergy and Autoimmunity. Immunity 53, 1202–1214.e6. 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Summers SA, Phoon RK, Odobasic D, Dewage L, Kitching AR, and Holdsworth SR (2011). Signal transducer and activation of transcription 6 (STAT6) regulates T helper type 1 (Th1) and Th17 nephritogenic immunity in experimental crescentic glomerulonephritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 166, 227–234. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04437.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Macey MR, Sturgill JL, Morales JK, Falanga YT, Morales J, Norton SK, Yerram N, Shim H, Fernando J, Gifillan AM, et al. (2010). IL-4 and TGF-β1 Counterbalance One Another while Regulating Mast Cell Homeostasis. J. Immunol. 184, 4688–4695. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wilkie H, Janssen E, Leyva-Castillo JM, and Geha RS (2021). DOCK8 Expression in Regulatory T Cells Maintains their Stability and Limits Contact Hypersensitivity. J. Invest. Dermatol. 141, 1503–1511.e3. 10.1016/j.jid.2020.09.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Oettgen HC, Martin TR, Wynshaw-Boris A, Deng C, Drazen JM, and Leder P (1994). Active anaphylaxis in IgE-deficient mice. Nature 370, 367–370. 10.1038/370367a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Scholten J, Hartmann K, Gerbaulet A, Krieg T, Müller W, Testa G, and Roers A (2008). Mast cell-specific Cre/loxP-mediated recombination in vivo. Transgen. Res. 17, 307–315. 10.1007/s11248-007-9153-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Herbert DR, Hölscher C, Mohrs M, Arendse B, Schwegmann A, Radwanska M, Leeto M, Kirsch R, Hall P, Mossmann H, et al. (2004). Alternative macrophage activation is essential for survival during schistosomiasis and downmodulates T helper 1 responses and immunopathology. Immunity 20, 623–635. 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00107-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Leyva-Castillo JM, Galand C, Kam C, Burton O, Gurish M, Musser MA, Goldsmith JD, Hait E, Nurko S, Brombacher F, et al. (2019). Mechanical Skin Injury Promotes Food Anaphylaxis by Driving Intestinal Mast Cell Expansion. Immunity 50, 1262–1275.e4. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Galand C, Leyva-Castillo JM, Yoon J, Han A, Lee MS, McKenzie ANJ, Stassen M, Oyoshi MK, Finkelman FD, and Geha RS (2016). IL-33 promotes food anaphylaxis in epicutaneously sensitized mice by targeting mast cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 138, 1356–1366. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Leyva-Castillo JM, McGurk A, Strakosha M, Vega-Mendoza D, Smith SEM, Stafstrom K, Elkins M, Chou J, Wang YH, and Geha RS (2023). IL-4 receptor alpha blockade dampens allergic inflammation and upregulates IL-17A expression to promote Saureus clearance in antigen sensitized mouse skin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 152, 907–915. 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.05.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kucuk ZY, Strait R, Khodoun MV, Mahler A, Hogan S, and Finkelman FD (2012). Induction and suppression of allergic diarrhea and systemic anaphylaxis in a murine model of food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 129, 1343–1348. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Leyva-Castillo JM, Galand C, Mashiko S, Bissonnette R, McGurk A, Ziegler SF, Dong C, McKenzie ANJ, Sarfati M, and Geha RS (2020). ILC2 activation by keratinocyte-derived IL-25 drives IL-13 production at sites of allergic skin inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 1606–1614.e4. 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Rao C, Coyte KZ, Bainter W, Geha RS, Martin CR, and Rakoff-Nahoum S (2021). Multi-kingdom ecological drivers of microbiota assembly in preterm infants. Nature 591, 633–638. 10.1038/s41586-021-03241-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chong J, Liu P, Zhou G, and Xia J (2020). Using MicrobiomeAnalyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nat. Protoc. 15, 799–821. 10.1038/s41596-019-0264-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
