Abstract
Background
Schizophrenia is a mental disorder with multifactorial etiology including positive, negative and cognitive symptoms. Nitric oxide (NO֗)-related biochemical pathways significantly contribute to the disease’s pathophysiology and subsequent antipsychotic treatment. Recently, metabotropic glutamatergic (mGlu) or muscarinic (M) receptors have been considered as potent antipsychotics with the potential to reverse cognitive symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate how selected mGlu or muscarinic receptor ligands regulate the most important aspects of NO֗-related neurotransmission.
Methods
In this study, MK-801—the tool compound that induces schizophrenia-related changes—was used alone or with mGlu or muscarinic receptor ligands. Positive allosteric modulators (PAM) of mGlu2 (LY487379), mGlu5 (CDPPB), M1 (VU0357017) and M4 (VU0152100) receptors were administered. cGMP levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, nitrite and GLT-1 s-nitrosilation processes were investigated in mouse brain and plasma samples, while oxidative stress was measured in vitro with the use of mouse or human astrocytic cell lines.
Results
MK-801 did not change cGMP levels, while a decrease was observed in mice treated with VU0357017 or LY487379 in parallel. Increased SOD activity was observed in the cortex of MK-801-treated mice, and the compounds, with the exception of CDPPB, prevented this effect. The investigated compounds also prevented an MK-801-induced increase in plasma nitrite levels. GLT-1 protein was decreased after MK-801 treatment which was not evident in mice administered with muscarinic or mGlu ligands. GLT-1 S-nitrosilation was increased in all groups. In vitro studies revealed the potency of these compounds in counteracting MK-801-induced oxidative stress.
Conclusions
The present data confirm that both mGlu and muscarinic receptor ligands may exert antipsychotic effects through biochemical pathways regulated by NO֗, in particular by decreasing oxidative stress indicators.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43440-025-00752-3.
Keywords: mGlu receptors, Muscarinic receptors, Schizophrenia, Reactive oxygen species, Superoxide dismutase, cGMP
Introduction
Cognitive decline and progressive dementias are common features of many brain disorders, significantly impacting quality of life. Symptoms are diagnosed in many disease entities, very often in schizophrenia [1–4]. The main predisposing risk factors are genetic background, endothelial dysfunction, and abnormal protein aggregation [4]. The complexity and diversity of individual cases constitute a fundamental difficulty in antipsychotic treatment, which, in most cases, does not improve cognitive dysfunction.
Nitric oxide (NO﮲), a gas molecule, plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. The basic process by which NO֗ exerts its function is cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production, which in turn regulates various physiological processes [5–10]. The first reports in this regard date back to the late 1970s, when Japanese scientist Takeo Deguchi demonstrated the relationship between cGMP cyclase activation and the presence of NO﮲ [11]. Subsequent studies confirmed the link between NO﮲ and glutamate-linked cGMP production [12, 13], as well as the correlation between NMDA receptor activation, cGMP concentration and the activity of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) [14]. Briefly, under normal conditions, NO﮲ is produced following the stimulation of NMDA receptors, which allows calcium (Ca++) to enter the cell and activate NOS. Besides regulating long-term potentiation (LTP) and the functioning of various proteins within neural cells [9, 15] the diverse effects of NO﮲ are critical for neurovascular homeostasis, and any dysregulation of NO﮲ signaling pathways is associated with the pathogenesis of CNS disorders, including schizophrenia [16]. In this context, NO֗ has been shown to interact with glutamatergic, dopaminergic and serotonergic pathways [17, 18]. Compared to healthy controls, reduced nitrergic neurons, NOS activity, dysregulation in the enzymes regulating the bioavalibility of L-arginine, dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 (DDAH1) and arginase have been observed in schizophrenia patients [19–22]. Furthermore, endothelial dysfunction, elevated oxidative or nitrosative stress, and a comprised anti-oxidant response in plasma and tissue samples from schizophrenic patients have been repeatedly demonstrated [23–25]. These may result in neurovascular unit dysfunction and blood–brain barrier hyperpermeability in schizophrenia [26], with NO֗ playing an essential role in these processes.
Available data concerning the impact of the antipsychotics currently used on NO﮲ pathways indicate that the compounds may have a detrimental effect on endothelial function and NO֗ neurotransmission [27–29]. Thus, novel antipsychotics without these disadvantages are highly needed. Animal models are key in evaluating the potency of compounds and their long-lasting neural consequences, and glutamatergic models in which NMDA antagonists produce behavioral deficits (resembling symptoms related to schizophrenia) are widely used in rodents [30–32]. MK-801, a model based on NMDA antagonist applications, has been successfully used in our laboratory [33–39]. According to the glutamatergic theory of schizophrenia, the behavioral dysfunction induced by the NMDA receptor antagonist is a consequence of the brain being flooded with glutamate; this results from decreased GABAergic inhibitory control due to NMDA receptor blockade [40, 41]. Notably, NMDA antagonists produce schizophrenia symptoms in healthy humans.
The most promising novel strategies to reverse MK-801-induced dysfunction involve stimulating metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) or muscarinic (M) receptors [42–46]. Among all the tested compounds, positive allosteric modulators of mGlu2, mGlu5, M1 or M4 receptors were mostly effective [33–39]. Recently, the effects of these compounds on NO﮲-related pathways have been investigated, and it was noticed that the mGlu receptors PAMs exaggerated MK-801’s detrimental effects on endothelial nitric oxide (eNOS) expression, but prevented methylarginine production [47, 48]. The present study constitutes the continuation of this research and focuses on other NO֗-related aspects, such as cGMP expression, oxidative stress, and S-nitrosylation processes.
Materials and methods
Animals
Male Albino Swiss mice (Charles River Laboratory, Sulzfeld, Germany) weighing between 20 and 25 g were used throughout this study. The animals were kept in standard laboratory conditions at room temperature (22 ± 1 °C) under a 12/12 light/dark cycle in accordance with EU Directive 2010/63/EU and subsequent regulations of the Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (protocol no. 65/2020, 12.03.2020). Food and water were freely available. The number of animals used in each experimental group is indicated on the bar in the individual figures.
Drugs
MK-801 and LY487379 were purchased from Tocris, Bristol, UK, while CDPPB was obtained from Abcam, Cambridge, UK. VU0357017 and VU0152100 were purchased from BioByrt, and their chemical structures and properties can be found elsewhere [49–53]. MK-801, LY487379 and VU0357017 were first dissolved in 0.9% saline, while CDPPB and VU0152100 were dissolved in 10% Tween 80. Control animals received vehicles instead of drug injections (0.9% NaCl and 10% Tween 80). The treatment groups are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Detailed description of the experimental groups
| Groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | MK-801 (0.3) | MK-801(0.3)/LY487379 (1) | MK-801 (0.3)/CDPPB (5) | MK-801 (0.3)/VU0357017 (10) | MK-801 (0.3) /VU0152100 (5) |
| NMDA antagonist | NMDA antagonist/mGlu2 PAM | NMDA antagonist/mGlu5 PAM | NMDA antagonist/M1 AA | NMDA antagonist/M4 PAM | |
For 14 days, all drugs were administered at working doses established in previous studies [33–37, 47, 48] as follows:
The compounds were administered intraperitoneally (ip) at a volume of 10 ml/kg once a day. Animals were first injected with investigated compounds and then MK-801 was administered after 30 min.
The frontal cortex (FC) and hippocampus from each animal were dissected 24 h after the last administration.
cGMP ELISA
The samples were homogenized in 5% TCA in water, followed by centrifugation at 3000× g for 5 min. Acetylated cGMP levels in supernatant from FCs and hippocampi were quantified using an ELISA assay (Cayman Chemicals, Tallinn, Estonia, Cat# 581021) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The standard curve range was 0.023–3 pmol/1000 µL under experimental conditions.
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity assay in brain homogenates
Brain tissue samples from the FCs and hippocampi were thawed and suspended in 700 µL of PBS. Tissue homogenization was performed using a TissueLyser (Qiagen). A metal bead (Qiagen) was placed into eppendorf-type tubes, and homogenization was carried out at 23 Hz for 2 min. After homogenization, the samples were centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to new tubes and centrifuged again at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was diluted and used to determine SOD. FC samples were diluted 4x, and those from the hippocampus were diluted 8x. The subsequent steps followed the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Sci; SOD Colorimetric Activity Kit.# EIASODC).
Additionally, protein content was quantified using the BCA method (Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit). SOD activity was normalized to the protein concentration and expressed as percentage of control.
Griess method
Blood was collected, transferred to sodium citrate-washed eppendorf tubes and immediately centrifuged at 1200 x g at 4 °C for 10 min. The plasma was collected into new eppendorf tubes and immediately transferred to a -80 °C freezer, where it was stored until the NO﮲ content was measured.
To enhance metabolite yield, an additional plasma deproteinization step was incorporated, following the method described by Chan et al. [54]. In this approach, the plasma sample is deproteinized using an organic solvent, which precipitates the proteins while allowing the metabolites to remain in the supernatant. For deproteinization, a 20% methanol-in-ethanol solution was prepared and mixed with the plasma sample at a ratio of 1:3. The mixture was vortexed for 1 min and incubated on ice for 20. After this, the sample was centrifuged at 20 000 x g at 4 °C for 10 min, and the supernatant containing metabolites was used to determine the concentration of NO﮲ using the Griess method.
Although NO﮲ can be measured via various direct and indirect methods, its short half-life and low in vivo concentrations make many of these methods impractical for evaluating biological samples. These challenges can be overcome by measuring stable metabolites, particularly nitrite (NO2) and nitrate (NO3). Since it is the only stable end-product of the autoxidation of NO﮲ in aqueous solutions, measuring NO2 levels provides a reliable and quantitative estimate of NO﮲ production in the in vivo environment. For this reason, an additional step was included of reducing nitrate (NO3) to nitrite (NO2) using vanadium (III) salt, as described by Brovkovych et al. [55]. This method allows for reducing NO3 and measuring NO2 in a single step, without the need to remove the reducing agent before measurement. Finally, NO2 content was quantified using a colorimetric Griess reaction.
NO3 reduction and NO2 content analysis were performed at room temperature. Briefly, a 96-well flat-bottomed plate was loaded with 50 µL of deproteinized plasma samples. Next, 50 µL of a 50 mM solution of vanadium (III) chloride (VCl3) was added to each well and mixed thoroughly. Then, 25 µL of Gress A reagent (1% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric H3PO4 acid; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and 25 µL of Griess B reagent (0.1% N-1-(naphthyl)ethylenediamine in H2O; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were added. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a plate reader (Thermo Scientific Multiskan Spectrum Spectrometer). NO﮲ concentration was calculated based on the NO standard curve, prepared via the serial dilution of 2 mM sodium nitrite solution (POCh, Gliwice, Poland) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) assay in cell cultures
The intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured using the nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction assay. In this test, cells are incubated with tetrazolium salt and subsequently take up NBT into their cytoplasm, where it is reduced by superoxide radicals to form purple-blue, water-insoluble formazan crystals. The formazan then releases a solubilization agent, which is quantified by measuring the absorbance of the resulting purple-blue mixture.
C8-D1A mouse astrocytes (ATCC) and 1321N1 human astrocytes (ECACC) were seeded in 96-well plates (40,000 cells per well), in DMEM cell culture medium with high glucose (Gibco)—supplemented with 10% of FBS (BioWest)—and penicillin-streptomycin solution (200 units of penicillin, and 200 µg of streptomycin per mL; Merck). After 24 h, the cells were treated with either muscarinic receptor activators, VU0357017, VU0152100, LY487379 or CDPPB. Each compound was tested in three different concentrations: 1, 5 and 10 µM. After 30 min, the cells were further treated with MK-801 (50 µM) for 24 h. Additionally, cells were stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; Merck), a potent protein kinase C activator, as a positive control. After 24 h, nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (10 mg/mL; Merck) was added to cells for 1 h. After this incubation, the supernatant was discarded, and the cells were fixed with 100% methanol for 15 min at room temperature. Once fixed, the plate was left to air dry. Next, 120 µL of 2 M KOH and 140 µL of 100% DMSO were added to each well and pipetted thoroughly; the absorbance was measured at 620 nm using a Thermo Scientific Multiskan Spectrum Spectrometer [56].
Detection of protein S-nitrosylation using biotin switch assay
Cysteine residue protein S-nitrosylation (SNO) was assessed using the biotin switch technique, as previously described by Forrester et al. [57]. Frontal cortex tissues were homogenized in 1.8 mL of lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 0.5 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitors, pH 7.4) using a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with 5 mm stainless steel beads (25 Hz, 3 min). Following centrifugation (2,000 × g, 10 min), protein concentration was determined via the BCA assay.
For SNO detection, 1.5 mg of protein homogenate was treated with 25% SDS (200 µL) and 20% methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS, 20 µL) in HEN buffer (250 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM neocuproine, pH 7.4). After incubation (50 °C, 20 min, dark), proteins were acetone-precipitated and resuspended in HENS buffer (100 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM neocuproine, 1% SDS, pH 8.0). Free thiols were then labeled with biotin-HPDP (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) in the presence of 80 mM sodium ascorbate (room temperature, 60 min, dark). Following another acetone precipitation, biotinylated proteins were enriched via overnight incubation with avidin–agarose beads (4 °C). Bound proteins were eluted in HENS buffer (95 °C, 10 min), centrifuged (5,000 × g, 30 s), and mixed with non-reducing Laemmli buffer. S-nitrosylation levels were analyzed by Western blot using streptavidin-HRP (Abcam #ab7403, 1:5,000). Our method’s specificity controls are provided in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S1.
The total protein (10 µg) derived from tissue lysates or 20 µL of biotin-conjugated protein eluates were separated on 8% SDS-PAGE gels and subsequently transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes following standard Western blot protocols. Post-transfer, membranes were blocked with TBS-T buffer (Thermo Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) containing 5% bovine serum albumin (Fraction V; Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) for 60 min at room temperature (RT). Membranes were then incubated at RT for 2 h with the following primary antibodies: β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany; Cat# A5441; dilution 1:10,000); Alzheimer precursor protein -APP (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany; Cat# MAB348; 1:2000); Glutamate transporter 1 GLT-1(Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany; Cat# AB1783; 1:3000); and Tau (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat# ab32057; 1:2000). Following primary antibody incubation, membranes were treated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies at RT for 1 h: anti-mouse IgG (Promega; Cat# W402B; 1:5000), anti-rabbit IgG (Promega; Cat# W401B; 1:5000), and anti-goat IgG (Millipore; Cat# AP108P; 1:10,000). Protein bands were visualized using the SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) and captured with the GeneGnome XRQ imaging system (SYNGENE, Cambridge, UK). Densitometric analysis was performed using GnomeSys software version 1.8.2. Original, unprocessed images of Western blots and biotin switch assay results are provided in the Supplementary Materials (Figures S2–S6).
Statistical analysis
The data were checked for the normal distribution and then a one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc comparison was performed for each dataset to determine the significance of differences between groups. A p-value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The F-statistic was reported with its corresponding degrees of freedom, presented as F(a, b), where ‘a’ denotes that between groups and ‘b’ denotes that within groups. If the normal distribution was not met, the data were analysed with a mixed-effects model.
The MK-801 group was taken as a reference group in post hoc analysis. The data are presented as means ± SEM.
Results
cGMP level
No significant changes in cGMP levels were obtained in any of the investigated brain regions following chronic MK-801 administration. Mixed-effects model analysis (REML), followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons, revealed that the administration of VU0152100, VU0357017, LY487379 or CDPPB did not change cGMP production in the FC compared to MK-801 (Fig. 1A). In the hippocampus, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc comparison revealed decreases in cGMP formation after the administration of VU0152100, VU0357017, and LY487379 (F5, 41=3.82, p = 0.0062, Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.

cGMP level in the frontal cortex (FC) (A) and hippocampus (B) after chronic (14-day) administration of MK-801 alone and in combination with the investigated compounds. Treatments are indicated under the bars and doses in brackets. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Dots indicate the number of animals used. * p < 0.01; ** p < 0.003 vs. MK-801
SOD activity in brain homogenates
A one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test revealed that MK-801 administration significantly increased SOD activity in the FC (F5, 42 = 4.608; p = 0.0019), while co-administration with VU0152100, VU0357017, or LY487379 effectively prevented this increase. In contrast, CDPPB did not exhibit any significant effect on SOD activity in the FC (Fig. 2A). When given alone, the compounds induced a significant increase in SOD activity compared to controls (F4, 21=44.87, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in frontal cortex (FC) (A, B) and hippocampus (C) after the administration of the compounds alone (B) or with MK-801 (A, C). Treatments are indicated under the bars and doses in brackets. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Dots indicate number of animals used. ###p < 0.0009 and #### p < 0.0001 vs. control. * p < 0.01; ** p < 0.007 vs. MK-801
In the hippocampus, MK-801 administration did not result in any significant changes in SOD activity. However, treatment with VU0152100, VU0357017, or LY487379 led to a significant decrease in SOD activity compared to both the control and MK-801-treated groups (F5, 42 = 6.12; p < 0.0002), indicating a region-specific response to these compounds (Fig. 2C).
Nitrate reduction and nitrite content analysis
In plasma, MK-801 administration induced an increase in NOx levels, as calculated by one-way ANOVA. All investigated compounds significantly reversed this MK-801-induced effect (F5, 39=10.08, p < 0.0001; Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Nitrite (NOx) levels in plasma after MK-801 administration with investigated compounds. Treatments are indicated under the bars and doses in brackets. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Dots indicate number of animals used. At least ####p < 0.0001 vs. control and ****p < 0.0008 vs. MK-801
NBT assay
In the C8D1A mouse astrocytic cell line, MK-801 (50 µM) induced an oxidative stress comparable to that of the reference compound PMA at 200 µM. The administration of the investigated compounds did not prevent this effect (F6, 74=3.789, p < 0.0024), as determined via one-way ANOVA.
In the 1321N1 human astrocytic cell line, MK-8001 (50 µM) also induced an oxidtive stress comparable to PMA (200 µM). One-way ANOVA revealed that all investigated compounds at all investigated concentrations prevented oxidative stress to the same extend. Here we show the results for the compounds applied at a concentration of 10 µM (F6, 61=8.09, p < 0.0001; Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) activity in mouse (A) or human (B) astrocyte cell lines after MK-801 administration with investigated compounds (all at a concentration of 10 µM). Treatments are indicated under the bars and doses in brackets. Data are presented as means ± SEM. At least #p < 0.0005 and ### p < 0.0001 vs. control and *p < 0.03, **p < 0.003 vs. MK-801
S-nitrosylation in brain tissue samples
Before estimating the S-nitrosylation of individual proteins, each sample was separated in polyacrylamide gel and total post-treatment S-nitrosylation was compared to that in the control group (all Western blots are presented in the Supplementary Materials). No significant differences were observed between groups.
The total expression patterns of six treatment groups relative to β-actin were evaluated. No changes in the expression of Alzheimer’s precursor protein (APP) were observed following MK-801 treatment. VU0152100 administration induced an increase in APP expression, as determined with one-way ANOVA followed by Donnatt’s post hoc comparison (F5, 42 = 7.22, p < 0.0001, Fig. 5A), while the other compounds had no effect. This change was primarily caused by a marked reduction in β-actin levels compared to the other experimental groups. In contrast, the APP protein level remains relatively consistent across all groups.
Fig. 5.
Densitometric analysis of Western blot results demonstrating changes in the expression of (A) Alzheimer precursor protein (APP), (B) glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1), (C) GLT1-SNO and (D) total S-nitrosylation in the frontal cortex after chronic (14-day) administration of the investigated compounds. Treatments are indicated under the bars and doses in brackets. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Dots indicate number of animals used. At least #p < 0.02 and ##p,0.007 vs. control *p < 0.05, **p < 0.02, ***p < 0.0004 and ****p < 0.0001 vs. MK-801 group. (E) Representative blots
Chronic MK-801 administration resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the expression of glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) relative to the control, and the administration of VU0152100, VU0357017 and LY487379 prevented this effect (F5, 42 = 3.93, p = 0.0052, Fig. 5B).
The total expression of GLT1-SNO was increased fallowing MK-801 administration, and the administration of VU0152100, VU0357017, and CDPPB exacerbated this effect (F5, 42=23.43, p < 0.0001, Fig. 5C).
Total S-nitrosylation forms were not altered by MK-801 administration, but the administration of all investigated compounds significantly decreased total S-nitrosylation (F5, 42=11.51, p < 0.0001, Fig. 5D).
Discussion
The present study investigates the role of NO֗-related biochemical pathways in reversing schizophrenia-related deficits by mGlu or muscarinic receptor ligands. cGMP levels, oxidative stress-related indicators (SOD, NOx) and S-nitrosylation processes were examined in mouse brain samples (hippocampi or frontal cortices). The impact of the compounds on the intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was also measured in vitro, in both human and mouse astrocytic cell lines.
NO֗-related biochemical pathways, which regulate a variety of physiological processes, are implicated in many pathological conditions, including schizophrenia and the other central nervous system (CNS) disorders [26, 58, 59].
MK-801 is widely accepted compound use to induce schizophrenia-related dysfunctions in mice [60, 61]. Hyperactivity, social withdrawal and cognitive deficits are commonly observed after MK-801 administration and the reversal of these effects may reflect antipsychotic-like activity. The stabilization of glutamatergic activity is one of the fundamental mechanisms in this process.
Recently, PAMs of muscarinic and mGlu receptors have been shown to prevent MK-801-induced behavioral changes and exert their action through different mechanisms [40, 62]. M1 and mGlu5 receptors are linked with Gq proteins and have postsynaptic localization, while M4 and mGlu2 receptors activate inhibitory Gi proteins and regulate glutamatergic release because of their presynaptic expression on glutamatergic terminals [40, 63–65]. Considering M1 and mGlu5 receptors PAMs’ mechanism of antipsychotic action, it is hypothetically very likely that a large pool of these receptors is expressed on GABAergic or, alternatively, glutamatergic neurons that innervate GABAergic neurons. Under these conditions, glutamate activity could be diminished. The inhibition of glutamate release by mGlu2 or M4 receptors PAMs is more evident, as it is directly inhibited by the activation of presynaptic receptors.
Regulation of NO֗-related pathways is critical considering the safety of the drugs and effective antipsychotic treatment. Recently, it has been shown that the tool compound MK-801 destabilized eNOS dimerization, impaired DDAH1 or PMRT5 expression, and limited L-arginine bioavailability, promoting the synthesis of its derivatives [67–69]. mGlu and muscarinic receptor PAMs improve the bioavailability of L-arginine, preventing the production of its derivatives in a MK-801 model [36, 47], while only muscarinic receptor ligands prevent MK-801-induced eNOS dysfunction [47, 48].
The present study builds upon this research, focusing on additional aspects of NO֗-related biochemistry, such as cGMP production, oxidative stress generation, and S-nitrosylation processes.
cGMP synthesis is regulated by the NMDA receptor and NO֗ [66], and the molecule serves as a key second messenger activating cGMP-dependent protein kinase and, consequently, the phosphorylation of various proteins [67]. cGMP is an important regulator of various cellular signaling pathways, playing a crucial role in learning and memory processes as part of the glutamate-NO-cGMP axis. This pathway is essential in LTP, which stabilizes learning and memory abilities [15, 68–70]. Additionally, glutamate neurotransmission/NO/cGMP pathway dysfunction has been described in schizophrenic patients [71], confirming the role of molecules in the disease.
Thus, NO/cGMP signaling cascades may be involved in the mechanism by which the NMDA antagonist induces schizophrenic symptoms. In the present study, MK-801 administration for 14 days did not alter cGMP levels in either the cortex or hippocampus, consistent with our earlier findings [38]. Other studies have reported either no changes or enhanced cGMP production following MK-801 treatment [72], but decreases in spatial learning model were also noted [34].
In the present study, changes in cGMP levels were not significant between investigated groups, while a visibly higher expression was observed in mice treated with MK-801 alone and with mGlu PAMs. In the hippocampus, decreases in cGMP production were observed in the groups treated with the investigated compounds (with the exception of the CDPPB group).
To a certain extent, these results contradict expectations. However, cGMP is produced either in endothelial cells, neurons or glia, creating technical difficulty in assessing cGMP synthesis changes in each cell type.
The cGMP neuronal pool is important in the LTP process [72], making up part of the glutamate-NO-cGMP pathway [73]. However, data in the literature concerning the impact of MK-801 on LTP demonstrate its limited impact, with no strong evidence that MK-801 destabilizes the process [74, 75]. It is likely that the inactivation of other signaling pathways, such as ERK1/2 CREB, plays a more significant role [76]. Though LTP has been most extensively studied in the hippocampus, it has been observed in a variety of other structures, including the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and amygdala [77]. The process can be NMDA-dependent or -independent [78], NOS and mGlu receptors are among the different modulators [79, 80], but the present results are far from these speculations.
However, in all possible considerations, decreased cGMP production would be a hindrance to satisfactory treatment. It is understood that the drug may have limits, and that it may be detrimental in terms of oxidative stress.
In pathological conditions involving NOS uncoupling, reactive oxygen (ROS) or nitrogen species (RNS) are generated in place of cGMP; this may underline the pathophysiology of schizophrenia [81]. Although post mortem studies are conclusive, data on oxidative stress in MK-801-induced animal models are inconsistent. It is hypothesized that the activation, rather than blockade, of NMDA receptors generates ROS, and that MK-801, as an NMDA receptor antagonist, serves as a neuroprotective agent [82]. However, some studies confirm that MK-801 may induce oxidative stress, particularly at higher doses or in an age-dependent manner (e.g., adolescent rats) [83]; this suggests that MK-801-induced ROS generation in brain tissue homogenates is ambiguous. Therefore in animal samples SOD and nitrite were investigated as the indicators of oxidative stress.
SOD accelerates the reaction of the superoxide anion (O2•−), a negatively charged free radical [84], forming hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and oxygen (2O2•−+2 H+ → H2O2 + O2) [85]. Hydrogen peroxide, a product of the reaction catalyzed by SOD, can be a weak reductant or a relatively strong oxidant. While it is not a free radical, it can damage cells at low concentrations (10 µM). In the study increased SOD activity in the frontal cortex of the MK-801 group compared to controls was observed and this effect was prevented by the administration of the investigated ligands. Similar results have been obtained by other authors, who showed increased SOD activity—and other indicators of oxidative stress—in MK-801 treated rats; this was prevented by the administration of neuroprotective agents [86, 87]. In the hippocampus no changes after MK-801 administration were observed, but the investigated compounds slightly decreased its activity.
Concomitantly, SOD may serve as a double-edge sword and a key antioxidant enzyme for protecting against oxidative stress, serving as a promising therapeutic target for ROS-mediated diseases. As the investigated compounds, when given alone, increased enzyme activity, it is plausible that they act as antioxidants. We propose that MK-801-induced increase in SOD activity reflects previous cellular oxidative stress, and is a compensatory response on MK-801. Thus, in the MK-801 model, the result of their activity is to restore the redox balance.
Furthermore, MK-801-induced increases in plasma nitrite levels were also prevented by the drugs. These results suggest that both mGlu and muscarinic ligands may have the potential to prevent the MK-801-induced production of oxidative stress indicators.
To establish the ability of the investigated compounds to prevent oxidative stress, in vitro models of mouse and human astrocytic cell lines were used. MK-801-induced oxidative stress was measured as increased ROS, which was blocked by the investigated compounds in human—but not in mouse—astrocytic cells.
Finally, S-nitrosylation levels were investigated in the cortex. S-nitrosylation refers to the covalent attachment of a nitric oxide group (− NO) to a cysteine thiol within a protein, forming an S-nitrosothiol (SNO). This regulates protein function and cellular signaling by altering protein conformation, enzymatic activity, protein–protein interactions, and cellular localization. However, the exact role of S-nitrosylation is not fully understood, partly due to the transient nature of this modification. In our study, the total S-nitrosylation in brain homogenates was not altered by MK-801 administration, but the investigated compounds decreased the SNO modification of proteins. Since exaggerated SNO–protein modification may have exacerbated the etiology of schizophrenia, this property could be considered advantageous. Neither MK-801 nor the investigated compounds (except for the M1 allosteric agonist) affected the SNO-modification of APP, a key protein involved in Alzheimer’s-type dementia.
MK-801 administration decreased GLT-1 expression in the cortex, suggesting impaired glutamate uptake. This finding is consistent with the glutamatergic hypothesis of schizophrenia, which assumes that excessive glutamate activity in the cortex contributes to the disorder’s pathophysiology [40, 41].
In conclusion, the present data confirms that both mGlu and muscarinic receptor positive modulators may act through NO﮲-dependent pathways to prevent the pathological changes related to schizophrenia. However, not all effects they induce are beneficial, at least in MK-801 animal model. Although decreased cGMP production was noticed, the compounds prevented development of oxidative stress and stabilized GLT-1 protein expression. Thus, it is likely that the overall result of their action is the restoration of the redox balance and stabilization of glutamate content and reuptake.
In the context of antipsychotic activity, muscarinic ligands seem to be a slightly better choice, as mGlu activators were shown to trigger NOS uncoupling [48]. To avoid a risk of inducing adverse effects, the administration of mGlu ligands at low doses along with compounds acting at different pharmacological targets can be proposed as an optimal solution. The joint administration of mGlu and muscarinic ligands, or mGlu ligands with NO releasers, are among the good solutions [37, 47], especially that NO releasers serve as excellent antipsychotic or procognitive agents [39].
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Abbreviations
- APP
Alzheimer’s precursor protein
- CDPPB
4-cyano-N-(1,3-diphenyl-1 H-pyrazol-5-yl) benzamide
- cGMP
Cyclic guanosine monophosphate
- CNS
Central nervous system
- CREB
cAMP response element-binding protein
- DDAH
dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1
- DMSO
Dimethyl sulfoxide
- EDTA
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- eNOS
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase
- ERK1/2
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2
- FC
Frontal cortex
- GLT1
Glutamate transporter 1
- GSNO
S-nitrosoglutathione
- HEPES
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid
- HRP
Horseradish peroxidase
- LTP
Long-term potentiation
- LY487379
N-(4-(2-methoxyphenoxy)phenyl)-N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethylsulfonyl)pyrid-3-ylmethylamine
- mGlu
Metabotropic glutamate receptors
- MK-801
(5R,10 S)-(+)-5-Methyl-10,11-dihydro-5 H-dibenzo[a, d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine
- MMTS
Methyl methanethiosulfonate
- NADPH
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
- NBT
Nitro blue tetrazolium
- NMDA
N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
- NO
Nitric oxide
- NOS
Nitric oxide synthases
- O₂⁻•
Reactive superoxide
- ONOO−
Peroxynitrite radical
- PAM
Positive allosteric modulators
- PBS
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PMA
Phenyl-2-propanone
- PMRT5
Protein arginine methyltransferase 5
- PMSF
Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- SDS
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
- SOD
Superoxide dismutase
- VU0152100
5-{4-[2-(6-metylopirydyn-2-ylo)etylo]benzylo}-1,3-tiazolidyno-2,4-dion
- VU0357017
1-(4-methoxybenzyl)-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid
Author contributions
Conceptualization, J.M.W.; methodology, G.B. and M.S.; software, G.B. and M.S.; validation, J.M.W. and L.K.; formal analysis, J.M.W.,G.B and M.S.; investigation, J.M.W., G.B. and M.S.; data managment, J.M.W.; L.K. and G.B.; writing—review and editing; J.M.W. anf G.B; supervision; J.M.W. and L.K.; project administration, J.M.W.; funding acquisition, J.M.W and L.K.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Science Centre of Poland, under grant no 2019/33/B/NZ7/02699 (OPUS 17), and by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland, under grant no. 2/566516/SPUB/SP/2023.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethical approval
The study was performed in accordance with EU Directive 2010/63/EU and subsequent regulations of the Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and approved by the II Local Ethical Committee in Krakow, protocol no. 65/2020, date of issue 12.03.2020.
Consent for publication
All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Leszek Kalinowski, Email: leszek.kalinowski@gumed.edu.pl.
Joanna M. Wierońska, Email: wierons@if-pan.krakow.pl
References
- 1.Palushaj B, Lewis SJG, Abdelnour C. What is the future for dementia with lewy bodies? J Neurol. 2025;272:43. 10.1007/s00415-024-12734-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kalin NH. New findings related to cognition, intellectual disability, dementia, and autism. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177:473–5. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20040405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Galvin JE, Pollack J, Morris JC. Clinical phenotype of Parkinson disease dementia. Neurology. 2006;67:1605–11. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242630.52203.8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moraiti V, Porfyri GN. Schizophrenia and risk of dementia: A literature review. Eur Psychiatry. 2024;67:S760–1. 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1583. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bryan NS. Nitric oxide deficiency is a primary driver of hypertension. Biochem Pharmacol. 2022;206:115325. 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen J, Ye Z, Wang X, Chang J, Yang M, Zhong H, et al. Nitric oxide bioavailability dysfunction involves in atherosclerosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:423–8. 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heuberger DM, Schuepbach RA. Correction to: Protease-activated receptors (PARs): Mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic modulators in PAR-driven inflammatory diseases (Thrombosis Journal (2019) 17: 4 DOI: 10.1186/s12959-019-0194-8). Thromb J 2019;17:1–24. 10.1186/s12959-019-0212-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Lee H-M, Choi JW, Choi MS. Role of nitric oxide and protein S-Nitrosylation in Ischemia-Reperfusion injury. Antioxid (Basel). 2021;11. 10.3390/antiox11010057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Bahdar ZI, Abu-El-Rub E, Almazari R, Alzu’bi A, Al-Zoubi RM. The molecular mechanism of nitric oxide in memory consolidation and its role in the pathogenesis of memory-related disorders. Neurogenetics. 2025;26:22. 10.1007/s10048-025-00803-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chachlaki K, Prevot V. Nitric oxide signalling in the brain and its control of bodily functions. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:5437–58. 10.1111/bph.14800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Deguchi T. Endogenous activating factor for guanylate cyclase in synaptosomal-soluble fraction of rat brain. J Biol Chem. 1977;252:7617–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Knowles RG, Palacios M, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Formation of nitric oxide from L-arginine in the central nervous system: a transduction mechanism for stimulation of the soluble guanylate cyclase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1989;86:5159–62. 10.1073/pnas.86.13.5159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Bredt DS, Snyder SH. Nitric oxide mediates glutamate-linked enhancement of cGMP levels in the cerebellum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1989;86:9030–3. 10.1073/pnas.86.22.9030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Garthwaite J, Charles SL, Chess-Williams R. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor release on activation of NMDA receptors suggests role as intercellular messenger in the brain. Nature. 1988;336:385–8. 10.1038/336385a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bon CLM, Garthwaite J. On the role of nitric oxide in hippocampal Long-Term potentiation. J Neurosci. 2003;23:1941–8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-05-01941.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iova O-M, Marin G-E, Lazar I, Stanescu I, Dogaru G, Nicula CA, et al. Nitric oxide/nitric oxide synthase system in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders: an overview. Antioxidants. 2023;12:753. 10.3390/antiox12030753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lorrain DS, Hull EM. Nitric oxide increases dopamine and serotonin release in the medial preoptic area. NeuroReport. 1993;5:87–9. 10.1097/00001756-199310000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brenman JE, Bredt DS. Synaptic signaling by nitric oxide. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997;7:374–8. 10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lauer MS. Can the ST segment be saved? J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:622–4. 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bernstein HG, Keilhoff G, Seidel B, Stanarius A, Huang PL, Fishman MC, et al. Expression of hypothalamic peptides in mice lacking neuronal nitric oxide synthase: reduced beta-END immunoreactivity in the arcuate nucleus. Neuroendocrinology. 1998;68:403–11. 10.1159/000054390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xing G, Chavko M, Zhang L-X, Yang S, Post RM. Decreased calcium-dependent constitutive nitric oxide synthase (cNOS) activity in prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and depression. Schizophr Res. 2002;58:21–30. 10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00388-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zinellu A, Tommasi S, Carru C, Sotgia S, Mangoni AA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of nitric oxide-associated arginine metabolites in schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. 2024;14:439. 10.1038/s41398-024-03157-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fillman SG, Weickert TW, Lenroot RK, Catts SV, Bruggemann JM, Catts VS, et al. Elevated peripheral cytokines characterize a subgroup of people with schizophrenia displaying poor verbal fluency and reduced broca’s area volume. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:1090–8. 10.1038/mp.2015.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Boerrigter D, Weickert TW, Lenroot R, O’Donnell M, Galletly C, Liu D, et al. Using blood cytokine measures to define high inflammatory biotype of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:188. 10.1186/s12974-017-0962-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Momtazmanesh S, Zare-Shahabadi A, Rezaei N. Cytokine alterations in schizophrenia: an updated review. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Najjar S, Pearlman DM, Devinsky O, Najjar A, Zagzag D. Neurovascular unit dysfunction with blood-brain barrier hyperpermeability contributes to major depressive disorder: a review of clinical and experimental evidence. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:142. 10.1186/1742-2094-10-142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Burghardt K, Grove T, Ellingrod V. Endothelial nitric oxide synthetase genetic variants, metabolic syndrome and endothelial function in schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol. 2014;28:349–56. 10.1177/0269881113516200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ellingrod VL, Taylor SF, Brook RD, Evans SJ, Zöllner SK, Grove TB, et al. Dietary, lifestyle and Pharmacogenetic factors associated with arteriole endothelial-dependent vasodilatation in schizophrenia patients treated with atypical antipsychotics (AAPs). Schizophr Res. 2011;130:20–6. 10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wu JQ, Kosten TR, Zhang XY. Free radicals, antioxidant defense systems, and schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;46:200–6. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Recent advances in the phencyclidine model of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1301–8. 10.1176/ajp.148.10.1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kapur S, Seeman P. NMDA receptor antagonists ketamine and PCP have direct effects on the dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2 receptors: implications for models of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7:837–44. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Flores G, Morales-Medina JC, Diaz A. Neuronal and brain morphological changes in animal models of schizophrenia. Behav Brain Res. 2016;301:190–203. 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wierońska JM, Kłeczek N, Woźniak M, Gruca P, Łasoń-Tyburkiewicz M, Papp M, et al. mGlu₅-GABAB interplay in animal models of positive, negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Neurochem Int. 2015;88:97–109. https://doi.org/c. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Wierońska JM, Cieślik P, Burnat G, Kalinowski L. Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGlu2) and muscarinic receptors (M1, M4, and M5), alone or in combination, and its impact on the acquisition and retention of learning in the Morris water maze, NMDA expression and cGMP synthesis. Biomolecules. 2023;13:1064. 10.3390/biom13071064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cieślik P, Rafało-Ulińska A, Wierońska JM. Prevention of MK-801-induced amnestic effect with combined activation of 5-HT1A and muscarinic receptors in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024;238:173749. 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cieślik P, Domin H, Chocyk A, Gruca P, Litwa E, Płoska A, et al. Simultaneous activation of mGlu2 and muscarinic receptors reverses MK-801-induced cognitive decline in rodents. Neuropharmacology. 2020;174:107866. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cieślik P, Siekierzycka A, Radulska A, Płoska A, Burnat G, Brański P, et al. Nitric oxide-dependent mechanisms underlying mk‐801‐ or scopolamine‐induced memory dysfunction in animals: mechanistic studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1–27. 10.3390/ijms222212282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cieślik P, Radulska A, Burnat G, Kalinowski L, Wierońska JM. Serotonergic–muscarinic interaction within the prefrontal cortex as a novel target to reverse schizophrenia-related cognitive symptoms. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22. 10.3390/ijms22168612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Cieślik P, Kalinowski L, Wierońska JM. Procognitive activity of nitric oxide inhibitors and donors in animal models. Nitric Oxide. 2022;119:29–40. 10.1016/j.niox.2021.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Conn PJ, Lindsley CW, Jones CK. Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors as a novel approach for the treatment of schizophrenia. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30:25–31. 10.1016/j.tips.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Moghaddam B, Javitt D. From revolution to evolution: the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia and its implication for treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:4–15. 10.1038/npp.2011.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Monaco M, Trebesova H, Grilli M. Muscarinic receptors and alzheimer’s disease: new perspectives and mechanisms. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024;46:6820–35. 10.3390/cimb46070407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Srivastava A, Das B, Yao AY, Yan R. Metabotropic glutamate receptors in alzheimer’s disease synaptic dysfunction: therapeutic opportunities and hope for the future. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;78:1345–61. 10.3233/JAD-201146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Perez-Garcia G, Bicak M, Buros J, Haure-Mirande J-V, Perez GM, Otero-Pagan A et al. Orally active mGluR2/3 metabotropic antagonist pro-drug mimics the beneficial effects of physical exercise on neurogenesis, behavior, and exercise-related molecular pathways in an alzheimer’s disease mouse model 2022. 10.1101/2022.01.31.477906
- 45.Chen H, He T, Li M, Wang C, Guo C, Wang W, et al. Cell-type-specific synaptic modulation of mAChR on SST and PV interneurons. Front Psychiatry. 2023;13:1–11. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1070478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang J, He Y, Chen X, Huang L, Li J, You Z, et al. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) is associated with neurodegeneration and amyloid deposition in alzheimer’s disease: A [18F]PSS232 PET/MRI study. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024;16:1–13. 10.1186/s13195-024-01385-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Płoska A, Siekierzycka A, Cieślik P, Dobrucki LW, Kalinowski L, Wierońska JM. The impact of LY487379 or CDPPB on eNOS expression in the mouse brain and the effect of joint administration of compounds with NO• releasers on MK-801- or Scopolamine-Driven cognitive dysfunction in mice. Molecules. 2024;29:627. 10.3390/molecules29030627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Płoska A, Radulska A, Siekierzycka A, Cieślik P, Santocki M, Dobrucki IT, et al. The impact of mGlu2 or mGlu5 receptor activators on the production of l-arginine derivatives and the expression of PRMT5 or DDAH1 enzymes in animal models of cognitive decline. Nitric Oxide. 2025;154:140–51. 10.1016/j.niox.2024.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Clineschmidt BV, Martin GE, Bunting PR. Anticonvulsant activity of (+)-5-Methyl4 0, 11-dihydrodH-di benzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5, 10-imine (MK-801), A substance with potent anticonvulsant, central sympathomimetic, and apparent anxiolytic properties. 2. 1982.
- 50.Johnson MP, Baez M, Jagdmann GE, Britton TC, Large TH, Callagaro DO, et al. Discovery of allosteric potentiators for the metabotropic glutamate 2 receptor: synthesis and subtype selectivity of N-(4-(2-methoxyphenoxy)phenyl)-N-(2,2,2- trifluoroethylsulfonyl)pyrid-3-ylmethylamine. J Med Chem. 2003;46:3189–92. 10.1021/jm034015u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lindsley CW, Wisnoski DD, Leister WH, O’Brien JA, Lemaire W, Williams DL, et al. Discovery of positive allosteric modulators for the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 from a series of N -(1,3-Diphenyl-1 H - pyrazol-5-yl)benzamides that potentiate receptor function in vivo. J Med Chem. 2004;47:5825–8. 10.1021/jm049400d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Digby GJ, Utley TJ, Lamsal A, Sevel C, Sheffler DJ, Lebois EP, et al. Chemical modification of the M 1 agonist VU0364572 reveals molecular switches in Pharmacology and a bitopic binding mode. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2012;3:1025–36. 10.1021/cn300103e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Byun NE, Grannan M, Bubser M, Barry RL, Thompson A, Rosanelli J, et al. Antipsychotic Drug-Like effects of the selective M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor positive allosteric modulator VU0152100. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39:1578–93. 10.1038/npp.2014.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chan CX, Khan AA, Choi JH, Ng CD, Cadeiras M, Deng M, et al. Technology platform development for targeted plasma metabolites in human heart failure. Clin Proteom. 2013;10:7. 10.1186/1559-0275-10-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA. A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide. 2001;5:62–71. 10.1006/niox.2000.0319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Freeman R, King B. Technique for the performance of the nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT) test. J Clin Pathol. 1972;25:912–4. 10.1136/jcp.25.10.912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Forrester MT, Foster MW, Benhar M, Stamler JS. Detection of protein S-nitrosylation with the biotin-switch technique. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;46:119–26. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Najjar S, Pahlajani S, De Sanctis V, Stern JNH, Najjar A, Chong D. Neurovascular unit dysfunction and Blood-Brain barrier hyperpermeability contribute to schizophrenia neurobiology: A theoretical integration of clinical and experimental evidence. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:83. 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Katusic ZS, Austin SA. Neurovascular protective function of endothelial nitric Oxide - Recent advances. Circ J. 2016;80:1499–503. 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Eyjolfsson EM, Brenner E, Kondziella D, Sonnewald U. Repeated injection of MK801: an animal model of schizophrenia? Neurochem Int. 2006;48:541–6. 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Janus A, Lustyk K, Pytka K. MK-801 and cognitive functions: investigating the behavioral effects of a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist. Psychopharmacology. 2023;240:2435–57. 10.1007/s00213-023-06454-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Conn PJ, Jones CK, Lindsley CW. Subtype-selective allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors for the treatment of CNS disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30:148–55. 10.1016/j.tips.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Foster DJ, Bryant ZK, Conn PJ. Targeting muscarinic receptors to treat schizophrenia. Behav Brain Res. 2021;405:113201. 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Moran SP, Maksymetz J, Conn PJ. Targeting muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40:1006–20. 10.1016/j.tips.2019.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nicoletti F, Di Menna L, Iacovelli L, Orlando R, Zuena AR, Conn PJ, et al. GPCR interactions involving metabotropic glutamate receptors and their relevance to the pathophysiology and treatment of CNS disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2023;235:109569. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Russwurm M, Russwurm C, Koesling D, Mergia E. NO/cGMP: The Past, the Present, and the Future, 2013, pp. 1–16. 10.1007/978-1-62703-459-3_1
- 67.Hofmann F, Wegener JW. cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinases (cGK), 2013, pp. 17–50. 10.1007/978-1-62703-459-3_2 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 68.Montoliu C, Rodrigo R, Monfort P, Llansola M, Cauli O, Boix J, et al. Cyclic GMP pathways in hepatic encephalopathy. Neurological and therapeutic implications. Metab Brain Dis. 2010;25:39–48. 10.1007/s11011-010-9184-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Canales JJ, Corbalán R, Montoliu C, Llansola M, Monfort P, Erceg S, et al. Aluminium impairs the glutamate-nitric oxide-cGMP pathway in cultured neurons and in rat brain in vivo: molecular mechanisms and implications for neuropathology. J Inorg Biochem. 2001;87:63–9. 10.1016/s0162-0134(01)00316-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Miki N, Kawabe Y, Kuriyama K. Activation of cerebral guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977;75:851–6. 10.1016/0006-291X(77)91460-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Docherty AR, Bigdeli TB, Edwards AC, Bacanu S, Lee D, Neale MC, et al. Genome-wide gene pathway analysis of psychotic illness symptom dimensions based on a new schizophrenia-specific model of the OPCRIT. Schizophr Res. 2015;164:181–6. 10.1016/j.schres.2015.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Boix J, Llansola M, Cabrera-Pastor A, Felipo V. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 modulates the nitric oxide-cGMP pathway in cerebellum in vivo through activation of AMPA receptors. Neurochem Int. 2011;58:599–604. 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zhuo M, Hawkins RD, Long-Term Depression. A Learning-Related type of synaptic plasticity in the mammalian central nervous system. Rev Neurosci. 1995;6. 10.1515/REVNEURO.1995.6.3.259. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 74.Bartsch JC, Fidzinski P, Huck JHJ, Hörtnagl H, Kovács R, Liotta A, et al. Enhanced dopamine-dependent hippocampal plasticity after single MK-801 application. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:987–95. 10.1038/npp.2014.276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Blot K, Kimura S-I, Bai J, Kemp A, Manahan-Vaughan D, Giros B, et al. Modulation of hippocampus-prefrontal cortex synaptic transmission and disruption of executive cognitive functions by MK-801. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25:1348–61. 10.1093/cercor/bht329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Guo C-P, Li W-S, Liu Y, Mahaman YAR, Zhang B, Wang J-Z, et al. Inactivation of ERK1/2-CREB pathway is implicated in MK801-induced cognitive impairment. Curr Med Sci. 2023;43:13–21. 10.1007/s11596-022-2690-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Malenka RC, Bear MF. LTP, LTD. Neuron. 2004;44:5–21. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 78.Alkadhi KA. NMDA receptor-independent LTP in mammalian nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 2021;200:101986. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lu Y-F, Kandel ER, Hawkins RD. Nitric oxide signaling contributes to Late-Phase LTP and CREB phosphorylation in the Hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1999;19:10250–61. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-23-10250.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Senter RK, Ghoshal A, Walker AG, Xiang Z, Niswender CM, Conn PJ. The role of mGlu receptors in hippocampal plasticity deficits in neurological and psychiatric disorders: implications for allosteric modulators as novel therapeutic strategies. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14:455–73. 10.2174/1570159x13666150421003225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bitanihirwe BKY, Woo T-UW. Oxidative stress in schizophrenia: an integrated approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35:878–93. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ribeiro RT, Zanatta Â, Amaral AU, Leipnitz G, de Oliveira FH, Seminotti B, et al. Experimental evidence that in vivo intracerebral administration of L-2-Hydroxyglutaric acid to neonatal rats provokes disruption of redox status and histopathological abnormalities in the brain. Neurotox Res. 2018;33:681–92. 10.1007/s12640-018-9874-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zou Y, Zhang H, Chen X, Ji W, Mao L, Lei H. Age-dependent effects of (+)-MK801 treatment on glutamate release and metabolism in the rat medial prefrontal cortex. Neurochem Int. 2019;129:104503. 10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hayyan M, Hashim MA, AlNashef IM. Superoxide ion: generation and chemical implications. Chem Rev. 2016;116:3029–85. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Fridovich I. Superoxide anion radical (O2-.), superoxide dismutases, and related matters. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:18515–7. 10.1074/jbc.272.30.18515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wąsik A, Białoń M, Jantas D, Żarnowska M. The impact of the combined administration of 1MeTIQ and MK-801 on cell viability, oxidative stress markers, and glutamate release in the rat Hippocampus. Neurotox Res. 2021;39:1747–61. 10.1007/s12640-021-00428-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ozyurt H, Ozyurt B, Sarsilmaz M, Kus I, Songur A, Akyol O. Potential role of some oxidant/antioxidant status parameters in prefrontal cortex of rat brain in an experimental psychosis model and the protective effects of melatonin. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18:2137–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Cieślik P, Wierońska JM. Regulation of glutamatergic activity via bidirectional activation of two select receptors as a novel approach in antipsychotic drug discovery. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8811. 10.3390/ijms21228811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

