Skip to main content
World Journal of Emergency Medicine logoLink to World Journal of Emergency Medicine
. 2025 Sep 1;16(5):415–422. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.0101

An approach for the emergency diagnosis and treatment of sepsis-associated encephalopathy in elderly individuals: a literature review

Wei Gu 1,, Jie Zhong 1, Chuanzhu Lyu 2, Guoqiang Zhang 3, Miaorong Xie 4, Yuefeng Ma 5, Wei Guo 6,
PMCID: PMC12444245  PMID: 40979799

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a diffuse dysfunction of the nervous system resulting from sepsis originating outside the central nervous system. Elderly individuals (≥65 years of age) constitute a particularly vulnerable population comprised by a high burden of underlying diseases and complications, which frequently leads to underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis. These patients are at increased risk of long-term or permanent central nervous system impairment, making rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment especially critical. The review is expected to promote improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of SAE in elderly patients, ultimately achieving more standardized and efficient SAE management.

METHODS:

We performed a literature search in four databases—PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang—from inception to April 2025 using bilinguals (Chinese and English).

RESULTS:

The diagnostic criteria for SAE in elderly individuals include the following: (1) sepsis; (2) new-onset neurological dysfunction; and (3) exclusion of other causes of neurological dysfunction. Physicians should develop tailored empiric anti-infective plans for elderly SAE patients, considering comorbidities, organ function, infection site, local bacterial spectrum, and resistance. The treatment protocol can be adjusted once the pathogen is identified. Stabilizing hemodynamics and ensuring cerebral perfusion are two fluid resuscitation strategies used in elderly SAE patients. An individualized approach to fluid resuscitation using restrictive fluid volumes should be employed. Supportive treatment for elderly SAE patients focuses on improving tissue perfusion/oxygenation, controlling blood glucose levels, and correcting internal imbalances. Early rehabilitation, nutritional support, cognitive training, and family-based emotional support are important components of comprehensive care.

CONCLUSION:

The diagnosis and management of SAE in elderly patients support early recognition and timely intervention.

Keywords: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy, Elderly, Emergency, Diagnosis, Management

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a form of diffuse neurological dysfunction that arises secondary to sepsis in the absence of overt central nervous system (CNS) infection.[1] The increasing incidence of sepsis among older adults (aged ≥65 years) has led to a corresponding increase in SAE cases within this population.[2] Owing to atypical clinical presentations, multiple comorbidities, and age-related complications, elderly patients with SAE frequently experience delays in diagnosis and treatment, which may result in long-term or irreversible CNS injury. Consequently, timely and accurate diagnosis and intervention are essential for optimizing outcomes in this vulnerable population. However, standardized diagnostic and therapeutic protocols for SAE in elderly patients are currently lacking.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in four databases—PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang—from inception to April 2025 via bilinguals (Chinese and English). Keywords included “sepsis-associated encephalopathy,” “diagnostic criteria for sepsis-associated encephalopathy,” “therapeutic strategies for sepsis-associated encephalopathy,” and “geriatric sepsis.” Eligible sources included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective studies, case reports, clinical guidelines, and expert consensus statements.

RESULTS

Risk factors

Studies have shown that a history of CNS disorders (e.g., stroke and epilepsy), long-term psychotropic drug use,[3] acute kidney injury, and homeostatic disorders are key risk factors for SAE in elderly individuals.[4] Acute kidney injury can lead to acidosis and metabolic abnormalities, resulting in the accumulation of neurotoxic substances. Geriatric sepsis is often associated with metabolic imbalances such as hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and hypernatremia, which further increase the risk for SAE.[5,6] Additionally, the CNS in older adults is more susceptible to injury during sepsis as a result of reduced tolerance to hypoxia and impaired vascular autoregulation. In this context, low mean arterial pressure (MAP), a reliable indicator of tissue perfusion, can result in cerebral hypoperfusion and neuronal injury, thereby contributing to the development of SAE.[7]

Clinical features

Elderly patients—particularly those aged ≥80 years—often cannot provide accurate medical histories as a result of memory loss or dementia. The clinical manifestations of SAE in this population are frequently atypical, with approximately one-quarter of patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms. These patients often lack clear signs of systemic infection (e.g., fever or elevated white blood cell count).[8] Some patients may exhibit altered mental status (e.g., changes in cognition or arousal, confusion, or impaired attention[9]), whereas others may present in coma, leading to misdiagnosis as other CNS disorders.

Older adults often have multiple chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, cancer, congestive heart failure) and a weakened immune system, which increase their susceptibility to infection.[10] In these cases, SAE typically arises from the combined effects of chronic disease and sepsis rather than an isolated dysregulated immune response. This complex interplay complicates diagnosis, making early identification of SAE particularly important in elderly individuals. Table 1 outlines the differential diagnosis of SAE and other conditions based on clinical features.

Table 1.

Differential diagnosis of sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) and other conditions based on clinical features

Features SAE Stroke Epilepsy Metabolic encephalopathy
Disease onset
and state of
consciousness
• Synchronized with sepsis
• Progressive impairment of
consciousness
• Delirium
• Decreased concentration or
orientation
• Coma
• Acute onset (minutes to
hours)
• Sudden focal neurological
deficits
• Level of consciousness
depends on lesion location
(e.g., brainstem lesions may
cause coma)
• Episodic (lasting seconds
to minutes)
• Loss of consciousness
during the ictal phase
(tonic-clonic seizures)
• Normal consciousness
between episodes
• Onset synchronized with
metabolic disturbances (e.g.,
hyponatremia, liver failure)
• Fluctuating levels of
consciousness
• Drowsiness progressing to coma
Neurological
signs
• No focal neurological deficits
• Diffuse hypertonia or hypotonia
• Focal deficits (e.g.,
hemiplegia, aphasia, visual
field loss)
• Positive pathological reflexes
• Tonic‒clonic seizures
during the ictal phase
• Postictal paralysis (Todd’s
paralysis)
• Symmetrical tremor
• Ataxia (e.g., Wernicke’s
encephalopathy)
• Asterixis (e.g., hepatic
encephalopathy)
Accompanying
symptoms
• Nausea and vomiting
• Dyspnea
• Headache (suggestive of
hemorrhagic stroke)
• Vertigo (posterior circulation
stroke)
• Dysarthria or dysphagia
• Preictal auras (e.g., visual
hallucinations, olfactory
hallucinations)
• Tongue biting
• Urinary or fecal
incontinence
Symptoms of underlying disease:
• Jaundice (e.g., hepatic
encephalopathy)
• Polyuria/oliguria (e.g., renal
failure)
• Hunger pangs (e.g.,
hypoglycemia)
Accompanying
signs
Signs of sepsis-associated organ
failure:
• Skin mottling
• Acral cyanosis (hypoperfusion)
• Decreased urine output
Vascular indicators:
• Carotid bruit
• Atrial fibrillation
• Acute hypertension
(hemorrhagic stroke)
Ictal indicators:
• Mydriasis (tonic)
• Tachycardia or apnea
Signs of metabolic disturbances:
• Kayser-Fleischer rings (Wilson’s
disease)
• Signs of clinical dehydration
(e.g., hyperosmolar coma)
• Palmar erythema or spider
angiomas (hepatic
encephalopathy)

Common diagnostic methods

Diagnostic approaches for SAE include the testing of sepsis biomarkers, neuronal injury markers, and neuroimaging studies (Table 2). In elderly patients presenting with new-onset neurological dysfunction, prompt evaluation with routine blood and urine tests; biochemical panels; measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP), serum lactate (Lac), procalcitonin (PCT), and heparin-binding protein (HBP); and cranial computed tomography (CT) are essential to exclude alternative diagnoses, such as stroke or intracranial masses, and to enable early sepsis screening.[11,12] Where resources permit, additional assessments—including markers of sepsis-induced neuronal injury, cytokine/chemokine profiling, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis—should be undertaken. MRI is recommended for SAE diagnosis and management, as abnormal findings are observed in more than 70% of affected patients.[13] Given the limited specificity and the need for expert interpretation, EEG is not suitable for the emergency diagnosis of SAE but may be valuable for monitoring and prognostic evaluation in the intensive care unit.[14] CSF analysis plays a critical role in excluding CNS infection, hemorrhage, and other specific encephalopathies.

Table 2.

Common diagnostic methods for SAE

Types Specific methods Clinical significance
Laboratory and metabolic testing • Blood and urine routine tests, electrolytes, liver and
kidney function tests, blood glucose, blood gas
analysis, serum lactate
• Infection markers (e.g., PCT, CRP, HBP)
• IL-1β and TNF-α
• Etiological testing
• Aids in early detection of infection and systemic
inflammatory response
Neuronal injury biomarkers • NSE
• S100β
• GFAP
• NfL
• Indicates neuronal or glial injury
Neuroelectrophysiological
monitoring
• EEG • Detects slow waves, epileptiform discharges, and
suppressed brain activity; useful for monitoring
and prognostication
Neuroimaging • CT
• MRI of the brain (e.g., DWI and FLAIR sequences)
• Excludes acute intracerebral hemorrhage and
infarction; assesses structural abnormalities and
white matter or microvascular damage
Other specialized tests • CSF analysis (cell count, protein, glucose, etc.,)
• Serum autoantibodies
• Helps exclude CNS infections, autoimmune
encephalitis, and other specific encephalopathies

SAE: sepsis-associated encephalopathy; PCT: procalcitonin; CRP: C-reactive protein; HBP: heparin-binding protein; IL-1β: interleukin-1 beta; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; NSE: neuron-specific enolase; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; NfL: neurofilament light chain; EEG: electroencephalogram; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; FLAIR: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; CNS: central nervous system.

Diagnosis

Although no unified diagnostic standard currently exists for SAE, diagnosis requires the simultaneous fulfillment of three essential criteria: (1) the presence of sepsis; (2) new-onset neurological dysfunction; and (3) the exclusion of alternative causes of neurological impairment (e.g., stroke, intracranial infection, poisoning, hepatic encephalopathy, pulmonary encephalopathy, or diabetic hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome).[15] In elderly patients, sepsis often presents atypically,[16] and neurological symptoms may constitute the initial manifestation.[17] For the early detection of sepsis in older adults with neurological changes, the quick Sequential Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and the modified Early Warning System (MEWS) are both recommended tools.[18] Emergency physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for neuropsychiatric signs—such as confusion, impaired concentration, dyspraxia, delirium, and agitation—upon admission of geriatric patients with suspected sepsis.[19] For clinical evaluation, the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) are useful for assessing delirium, whereas the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is appropriate for evaluating comatose state.

Screening for infection foci

Accurate identification and early control of infection foci are central to the management of SAE. In patients aged ≥85 years, lower respiratory tract and urinary tract infections are the most prevalent causes of sepsis.[20-22] Aspiration pneumonia is particularly common in this age group as a result of impaired swallowing, weakened cough reflexes, muscle loss, and senescence.[23] Viral pneumonia accounts for more than one-third of community-acquired pneumonia cases in adults and is associated with a high sepsis rate (61%). It affects older individuals and is frequently accompanied by neurological symptoms.[24] Two studies reported that 35.17% of elderly patients with COVID-19 exhibited cognitive impairment, and 59.24% had persistent deficits six months post-discharge.[25,26]

Urinary tract infections are also more common in elderly individuals as a result of immunosenescence, age-related physiological changes, and frequent catheter use—factors that increase the risk of progression to sepsis and SAE.[27] Bloodstream and intra-abdominal infections, while less common, are characterized by rapid deterioration and high mortality. European and North American studies report a 12%-20% mortality rate for bloodstream infections, with over half occurring in patients over 65 years of age. In such cases, early identification of the pathogen and infection source is critical. The diagnosis of intra-abdominal infections is often delayed in elderly patients with nonspecific symptoms, which accelerates progression to sepsis and, ultimately, SAE.

Principles of treatment

Key principles in the treatment of SAE include rapid recognition and early identification of sepsis, comprehensive assessment, identification of the infectious source and causative pathogens, and timely initiation of antimicrobial therapy. In addition to targeted anti-infective measures, supportive care—such as individualized early fluid resuscitation, oxygen therapy, correction of internal environmental disturbances, and appropriate sedation—is essential for promoting functional recovery and improving the prognosis of elderly SAE patients (Figure 1 for the diagnostic and treatment flowchart).

Figure 1. Diagnostic and treatment algorithm for sepsis-associated encephalopathy in elderly individuals. CRP: C-reactive protein; PCT: procalcitonin; HBP: heparin-binding protein; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; CNS: central nervous system; RASS: Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale; SAE: sepsis-associated encephalopathy.

Figure 1.

Antimicrobial therapy

SAE in the elderly is most commonly of bacterial origin. Empiric antimicrobial therapy should be guided by regional patterns of bacterial epidemiology and resistance, as well as the patient’s systemic condition and organ function. In cases associated with lower respiratory, urinary, or intra-abdominal infections, gram-negative bacilli are the predominant pathogens.[23] Empiric options may include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (e.g., cefoperazone/sulbactam or piperacillin/tazobactam). For severe or drug-resistant bacterial infections, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam are recommended. In elderly patients with bloodstream infections caused by gram-positive cocci—especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)—vancomycin may be used. For infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VREs), linezolid should be considered. Viral sepsis is also relatively common in this population and may lead to early neurological impairment and long-term cognitive decline.[24] In patients with confirmed viral sepsis, antiviral treatment should be initiated promptly. Older adults with SAE—particularly those over 80 years of age or with comorbidities—are at increased risk of coinfection with multiple pathogens, and repeated sampling for pathogens may be necessary to improve pathogen detection. In addition to pharmacological therapy, early removal of infection sources—such as sputum drainage, percutaneous abscess drainage, or surgical debridement—is also critical.

Antimicrobial selection must consider factors such as patient age and renal function (e.g., creatinine clearance). Where feasible, therapeutic drug monitoring can assist in optimizing individual dosing. Antimicrobials known to cause neurotoxicity should be avoided in elderly SAE patients with epilepsy, preexisting CNS disorders, or renal insufficiency. Inappropriate or prolonged use of broad-spectrum antibiotics may lead to adverse outcomes,[28] including disruption of the intestinal microbiota and antimicrobial-associated diarrhea.

Ensuring perfusion and improving oxygenation

Early restoration of hemodynamic stability and timely fluid resuscitation to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure are crucial for SAE management in elderly patients. Given the diminished cardiopulmonary reserve, older adults exhibit reduced responsiveness to volume expansion and limited tolerance for fluid loading; excessive fluid administration can therefore precipitate pulmonary edema.[29] As such, fluid resuscitation in elderly SAE patients should be individualized and restrictive. (1) For patients with arteriosclerosis and/or hypertension, a higher MAP target of 75-85 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) is recommended to preserve organ and cerebral perfusion.[30] Evidence suggests that maintaining a slightly elevated MAP is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in SAE patients.[31-33] However, the indiscriminate pursuit of MAP targets should be avoided. Vasopressors such as norepinephrine may be used when necessary. (2) Volume status should be reassessed every 2-4 h, with resuscitation adjusted accordingly to prevent fluid overload. (3) In cases of volume overload (e.g., pulmonary edema), diuretics and fluid restriction should be employed; renal replacement therapy may be considered if needed. (4) Colloids may be used to limit capillary leakage.[34] Resuscitation strategies include: (1) quantification of fluid intake/output and close monitoring of vital signs; (2) the passive leg raising test, which assesses fluid responsiveness without additional volume administration; (3) bedside ultrasound for rapid assessment of volume status in the emergency setting; and (4) serial measurement of blood lactate levels, as persistently elevated lactate is associated with poor prognosis.

Optimizing oxygenation is also critical in elderly SAE patients. Depending on clinical status—including disease severity, level of consciousness, and spontaneous respiratory effort—oxygen may be delivered via nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula, or non-invasive/invasive mechanical ventilation to maintain an oxygen saturation at or above 93%.

Management of blood glucose and the internal environment

Blood glucose should be actively controlled in elderly SAE patients.[35] Insulin therapy should be initiated when blood glucose levels reach ≥10 mmol/L. Although hypoglycemia is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality among septic patients, overly aggressive glucose-lowering strategies—with target levels of 5.0-6.1 mmol/L—markedly increase the risk of hypoglycemia.[36] For elderly SAE patients receiving insulin, glucose should be monitored at intervals of no longer than one hour. Once the blood glucose level and insulin infusion rates stabilize, monitoring may be extended every 2-4 h. However, if hypoglycemia occurs, the monitoring frequency should increase every 15 min until the glucose level stabilizes within the target range. Electrolyte imbalances, particularly disturbances in sodium levels, must also be promptly corrected. The key principles for managing electrolyte abnormalities in elderly SAE patients include: (1) screening for underlying conditions such as hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, or heart failure; and (2) adjusting the correction speed appropriately, as rapid correction may induce osmotic shifts leading to cerebral edema, whereas delayed correction may hinder treatment and increase mortality.

Sedation

For elderly SAE patients requiring sedation, both “shallow sedation” and “intermittent sedation” are recommended, with a target RASS score of −2 to +1.[37] Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist that acts on both central and peripheral receptors, is the preferred agent. Its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties make it well-suited for use in septic patients.[38] However, in elderly SAE patients, dexmedetomidine may induce bradycardia and hypotension; therefore, a reduced loading dose (0.5 μg/kg over 10 min) followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.2-0.7 μg/(kg·h) is recommended. It should be diluted in saline or glucose solution, with continuous monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure during administration. If bradycardia or hypotension occurs, the infusion should be reduced or discontinued. Dexmedetomidine is not recommended for patients with severe heart block or ventricular dysfunction. As it undergoes hepatic metabolism and is renally excreted 95% of the time, dose adjustment is required in patients with hepatic insufficiency but is generally not necessary for short-term use in elderly patients with renal impairment.[39]

Propofol and ciprofol, characterized by a rapid onset (within 1 min) and short duration of action (3-10 min), may serve as adjunctive sedatives for elderly SAE patients requiring brief, reversible sedation for procedures such as bedside bronchoscopy or blood purification in patients with poor cooperation. Research has confirmed that ciprofol is a novel sedative drug with a sedative compliance rate comparable to that of propofol and a lower incidence and shorter duration of adverse reactions such as hypotension.[40]

Traditional Chinese medicine

In traditional Chinese medicine, SAE is categorized as a manifestation of “unconsciousness” (Shen disturbance), with core pathophysiological mechanisms involving excessive heat toxin, obstruction of the orifices by phlegm and static blood, and a deficiency of vital qi. These factors interact to form a self-perpetuating pathological cycle. The primary therapeutic principles are “clearing heat and removing toxicity” and “clearing phlegm for resuscitation”. In elderly SAE patients, in whom patterns of deficiency and excess often coexist, syndrome differentiation should be carefully refined to guide the selection of appropriate interventions. For heat-blocking syndromes—characterized by high fever, unconsciousness, facial flushing, tachypnea, delirium, agitation, and a red tongue with yellow, dry coating—Angong Niuhuang pill or its derivative Xingnaojing Injection may be used. Angong Niuhuang pill has been reported to regulate blood-brain barrier permeability, protect the vascular endothelium, and suppress inflammation, thereby reducing cerebral edema and preserving brain tissue integrity.[41] Elderly individuals with severe vital qi deficiency are predisposed to septic shock, leading to SAE manifestations such as unconsciousness, pallor, cyanotic lips, clammy skin, pale tongue, and weak pulse—collectively referred to as yang collapse syndrome in traditional Chinese medicine. In such cases, Shenfu injection is indicated for yang restoration.[42] Acupuncture at Baihui, Shenmen, Xinyu, Shenting, Neiguan, and Shuigou may also be employed to refresh consciousness, open orifices, calm the heart, and stabilize the spirit.

Prognostic assessment and rehabilitation for elderly SAE patients

Monitoring and prognosis assessment

Systematic assessment of consciousness and continuous monitoring should be performed daily for elderly SAE patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Prolonged delirium or coma indicates severe neurological injury and is associated with an elevated risk of long-term cognitive and motor impairment. Delirium can be assessed via the RASS and ICDSC, whereas the GCS and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score are appropriate for evaluating coma severity and brainstem reflexes. In SAE patients complicated by epilepsy, refractory status epilepticus (RSE) serves as a critical predictor of poor prognosis. RSE can result in sustained cerebral hypoxia, brain edema, and metabolic disturbances, further exacerbating neurological damage. In elderly patients, RSE is associated with increased mortality due to limited cerebral perfusion and oxygenation reserves. Therefore, if feasible, long-term (24-72 h) continuous EEG monitoring is recommended to facilitate dynamic evaluation of survival and neurological outcomes.[43]

Rehabilitation

The neuropsychiatric sequelae of SAE in older adults may persist for months or even years, contributing to cognitive decline and psychological disorders (e.g., depression and anxiety). These complications, in combination with underlying comorbidities and malnutrition,[44] may lead to permanent disability or premature death. Sepsis in elderly patients also reduces physical endurance, often resulting in prolonged bed rest and complications such as recurrent urinary tract infections, hypostatic pneumonia, pressure ulcers, deep vein thrombosis, and sarcopenia. Early initiation of rehabilitation, including nutritional support, psychological evaluation, cognitive training, and emotional support from family members, offers a multi-dimensional approach to recovery. Such interventions can enhance physical function, mental well-being, and overall prognosis in elderly SAE patients.[45]

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis and management of SAE in elderly patients support early recognition and timely intervention.

Funding: This work was supported by the Beijing Clinical Key Specialty Project (2023).

Ethical approval: Not needed.

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Contributors: CZL, GQZ, MRX, YFM, WG (Wei Guo), and WG (Wei Gu) contributed to the study design. WG (Wei Gu) and JZ (Jie Zhong) contributed to the literature review and drafted the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Wei Gu, Email: banditgu@163.com.

Wei Guo, Email: guowei1010@126.com.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ren C, Yao RQ, Zhang H, Feng YW, Yao YM. . Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a vicious cycle of immunosuppression. J Neuroinflammation. 2020; 17(1): 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Manabe T, Heneka MT. . Cerebral dysfunctions caused by sepsis during aging. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022; 22(7):444-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sonneville R, de Montmollin E, Poujade J, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Souweine B, Darmon M, et al. . Potentially modifiable factors contributing to sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43(8):1075-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chen JY, Shi XB, Diao MY, Jin GY, Zhu Y, Hu W, et al. . A retrospective study of sepsis-associated encephalopathy: epidemiology, clinical features and adverse outcomes. BMC Emerg Med. 2020; 20(1): 77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jin GY, Wang SY, Chen JY, Hu W, Zhu Y, Xi SS. . Identification of sepsis-associated encephalopathy risk factors in elderly patients: a retrospective observational cohort study. Turk J Med Sci. 2022; 52(5): 1513-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rugg C, Ströhle M, Treml B, Bachler M, Schmid S, Kreutziger J. . ICU-acquired hypernatremia is associated with persistent inflammation, immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(9): 3017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Crippa IA, Salvagno M, Calabrò L, Taccone FS. . Brain hemodynamics in septic patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2024; 90(9): 814-29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rowe TA, McKoy JM. . Sepsis in older adults. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017; 31(4): 731-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rasulo FA, Bellelli G, Ely EW, Morandi A, Pandharipande P, Latronico N. . Are you Ernest Shackleton, the polar explorer? Refining the criteria for delirium and brain dysfunction in sepsis. J Intensive Care. 2017;5: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kingren MS, Starr ME, Saito H. . Divergent sepsis pathophysiology in older adults. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021; 35(16): 1358-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Liu Y, Gao X, Zhu YQ, Yu JW, Wang JH, Li YJ, et al. . Early dynamic monitoring of the predictive value of heparin-binding protein in elderly patients with sepsis. J Clin Emerg. 2023; 24(4): 173-8, 184. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cai X, Zheng RQ. . Progress in application of heparin-binding protein in sepsis. Chin J Clinicians (Electronic Edition). 2023; 17(4):487- 90. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Stubbs DJ, Yamamoto AK, Menon DK. . Imaging in sepsis-associated encephalopathy—insights and opportunities. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013; 9(10): 551-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Pantzaris ND, Platanaki C, Tsiotsios K, Koniari I, Velissaris D. . The use of electroencephalography in patients with sepsis: a review of the literature. J Transl Int Med. 2021; 9(1): 12-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Liu Y, Jian YZ, Wu CJ, Li CS. . Focus on sepsis-associated encephalopathy to improve sepsis outcome. Chin J Emerg Med. 2023; 32(6):719-23. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhong J, Pan XB, Gu W. . Clinical diagnosis and prognosis analysis in patients with emergency septic encephalopathy. J Chin Physician. 2023; 25(4):551-4. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Piva S, Bertoni M, Gitti N, Rasulo FA, Latronico N. . Neurological complications of sepsis. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023; 29(2): 75-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang XC, Wen W, Dong SM. . Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in geriatric sepsis: navigating complexity in elderly patients. Chin J Crit Care Med. 2024; 44(5):376-84. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cui YY, Liu B. . Advances in sepsis-associated encephalopathy: emerging mechanisms and clinical perspectives. Beijing Med J. 2023; 45(10):899-903. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lai Q, Xia YQ, Yang WT, Zhou YW. . Development and validation of a rapid and efficient prognostic scoring system for sepsis based on oxygenation index, lactate and Glasgow Coma scale. J Inflamm Res. 2023;16: 2955-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ibarz M, Haas LEM, Ceccato A, Artigas A. . The critically ill older patient with sepsis: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1): 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kumar NR, Balraj TA, Kempegowda SN, Prashant A. . Multidrug-resistant sepsis: a critical healthcare challenge. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(1): 46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Chinese Society of Emergency, Chinese Expert Consensus Group on Emergency Diagnosis and Treatment of Geriatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia. . Chinese expert consensus on geriatric community-acquired pneumonia in emergency care. Chin J Emerg Med. 2023; 32(10):1319-27. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Musher DM. . Pure viral sepsis secondary to community-acquired pneumonia in adults: risk and prognostic factors. J Infect Dis. 2020; 222(2):333-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Liu YH, Wang YR, Wang QH, Chen Y, Chen X, Li Y, et al. . Post-infection cognitive impairments in a cohort of elderly patients with COVID-19. Mol Neurodegener. 2021; 16(1): 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Long QY, Li JW, Hu XY, Bai Y, Zheng YL, Gao ZC. . Follow-ups on persistent symptoms and pulmonary function among post-acute COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8: 702635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Guliciuc M, Maier AC, Maier IM, Kraft A, Cucuruzac RR, Marinescu M, et al. . The urosepsis-a literature review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(9): 872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Pulia MS, Keller SC, Crnich CJ, Jump RLP, Yoshikawa TT. . Antibiotic stewardship for older adults in ambulatory care settings: addressing an unmet challenge. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020; 68(2): 244-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Dong SM, Zhang XC, Lv CZ. . Geriatric emergency critical care: expert consensus on volume management in acutely ill elderly patients. Chin J Crit Care Med. 2024; 44(6):461-72. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43(3): 304-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Peng HY, Liang ZX, Zhang SX, Yang YY. . Optimal target mean arterial pressure for patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1): 902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Rosenblatt K, Walker KA, Goodson C, Olson E, Maher D, Brown CH 4th, et al. . Cerebral autoregulation-guided optimal blood pressure in sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a case series. J Intensive Care Med. 2020; 35(12): 1453-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yu YT, Gong Y, Hu B, Ouyang B, Pan AJ, Liu JL, et al. . Expert consensus on blood pressure management in critically ill patients. J Intensive Med. 2023; 3(3): 185-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Pan G, Tian Y, Wang HL, Liang Q. . Research progress of sepsis associated capillary leak syndrome. Chin J Crit Care Med. 2022; 42(2): 163-9. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Huang CT, Lue JH, Cheng TH, Tsai YJ. . Glycemic control with insulin attenuates sepsis-associated encephalopathy by inhibiting glial activation via the suppression of the nuclear factor kappa B and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in septic rats. Brain Res. 2020;1738: 146822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wu ZX, Liu J, Zhang D, Kang K, Zuo XR, Xu QH, et al. . Expert consensus on the glycemic management of critically ill patients. J Intensive Med. 2022; 2(3): 131-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. The Society of Critical Care Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Expert Consensus Group on Analgesia, Sedation and Delirium Management in the Emergency Department of Chinese Adults. . Chinese expert consensus on analgesia, sedation, and delirium management for adults in emergency care. Chin J Emerg Med. 2023; 32(12):1594-609. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhang T, Mei QM, Dai SB, Liu YC, Zhu HD. . Use of dexmedetomidine in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Ann Intensive Care. 2022; 12(1): 81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wu XM, Xue ZG, Xue XM, Ma H, Wang G, Shi XY, et al. . Expert consensus on the clinical application of dexmedetomidine. J Clin Anesthesio. 2018; 34(8):820-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhao FZ, Li LZ, Luo PY, Duan XJ, Huang SF, Yin HY, et al. . Ciprofol versus propofol for long-term sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025; 25(1): 161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Deng XM, Zou Q, Zheng SY, Wang HX. . Protective effect and mechanism of Angong Niuhuang pill in sepsis-associated brain dysfunction of rats. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021; 33(8): 979-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Tan WZ, Deng J, Wu DH, Wan RW. . Therapeutic mechanisms of traditional chinese medicine in sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a review of recent advances. Hunan J Tradit Chin Med. 2023; 39(8):197-200. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sonneville R, Azabou E, Bailly P, Benghanem S, de Almeida Cardoso G, Claquin P, et al. . Management of severe acute encephalopathy in the ICU: an expert consensus statement from the French Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Ann Intensive Care. 2025; 15(1): 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ramsey KA, Rojer AGM, D’Andrea L, Otten RHJ, Heymans MW, Trappenburg MC, et al. . The association of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior with skeletal muscle strength and muscle power in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;67: 101266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Tang B, Chen WJ, Jiang LD, Zhu SH, Song B, Chao YG, et al. . Expert consensus on late stage of critical care management. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2023; 62(5): 480-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

RESOURCES