The questions on this page refer to Mui et al, “Validating Smartphone-Based and Web-Based Applications for Remote Hearing Assessment.”
Learner Outcomes
Readers of this article should be able to:
Understand the performance of the three examined hearing-assessment smartphone-based and web-based applications (apps).
Consider the use of hearing-assessment apps for screening and monitoring purposes.
CEU Questions
-
1)
Which of the following uses of apps for self-led management is not discussed in the article?
-
a)
Tinnitus management
-
b)
Auditory training
-
c)
Vestibular rehabilitation
-
a)
-
2)
Out of the 187 smartphone-based and web-based hearing-assessment apps identified by a scoping review in 2023, how many were deemed to have acceptable functionality?
-
a)
14
-
b)
22
-
c)
44
-
a)
-
3)
Which of the following apps uses Békésy audiometry as the testing method, as opposed to the other two apps that use conventional pure-tone audiometry?
-
a)
Hearing Test (Android) app
-
b)
Mimi Hearing Test (iOS) app
-
c)
MDHearing Aid (Web) test
-
a)
-
4)
Hearing assessments were repeated in the home environment on Day 2 to determine ecological validity. Which of the following measures was employed to ensure more accurate results?
-
a)
Provision of standardized earphones
-
b)
Instructions to undertake the assessments in a quiet location
-
c)
Simultaneous assistance via a video call
-
a)
-
5)
Among the examined apps, when identifying a hearing loss:
-
a)
The Hearing Test app showed the second highest sensitivity and highest specificity.
-
b)
The Mimi Hearing Test app showed the highest sensitivity and second highest specificity.
-
c)
The MDHearing Aid test showed the lowest sensitivity and highest specificity.
-
a)
-
6)
Regarding app accuracy when compared against standard audiometric testing,
-
a)
the Hearing Test app underestimated hearing thresholds (i.e., better hearing) across all frequencies.
-
b)
the Mimi Hearing Test app overestimated hearing thresholds (i.e., reduced hearing) across all frequencies.
-
c)
the MDHearing Aid test overestimated hearing thresholds at some frequencies and underestimated hearing thresholds at other frequencies.
-
a)
-
7)
When the testing was repeated on Day 1 to determine test-retest reliability,
-
a)
all apps showed moderate to good test-retest reliability across all frequencies.
-
b)
the MDHearing Aid test showed good to excellent test-retest reliability across all frequencies.
-
c)
the Hearing Test app and Mimi Hearing Test app showed good to excellent test-retest reliability across all frequencies.
-
a)
-
8)
Replication of hearing assessments in the home environment on Day 2 showed that:
-
a)
the Mimi Hearing Test app had moderate to excellent ecological validity above 1000 Hz.
-
b)
the MDHearing Aid test had good ecological validity below 1000 Hz.
-
c)
all apps had moderate ecological validity below 2000 Hz.
-
a)
-
9)
Based on the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) scores,
-
a)
the usability of the Hearing Test app was ranked second highest.
-
b)
the usability of the Mimi Hearing Test app was ranked highest.
-
c)
the usability of the Hearing Test app and MDHearing Aid test was ranked highest.
-
a)
-
10)
Which of the following apps was suggested to be potentially useful for hearing screening and monitoring in adults with additional validation?
-
a)
Hearing Test app
-
b)
Mimi Hearing Test app
-
c)
MDHearing Aid test
-
a)