ABSTRACT
MYB transcription factor family represents one of the largest and most functionally diverse groups of regulatory proteins in plants, playing a crucial role in controlling genes involved in growth, development, and stress responses. MYB proteins are characterized by a conserved N-terminal DNA-binding domain. They are classified based on the number of R repeats, and possess a variable C-terminal region that determines their specific functions. In response to environmental signals, MYB proteins bind to specific DNA elements in target promoters, acting alone or with other regulators to modulate stress-responsive pathways. These factors integrate signaling cascades involving abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), brassinosteroids (BR), and reactive oxygen species (ROS), aiding plant adaptation to adverse conditions. This review explores structural features, classification, and regulatory mechanisms, focusing on their roles in salinity, drought, extreme temperatures, nutrient deficiencies, heavy metal toxicity, and pathogen defense. Additionally, we highlight the advances and potential of MYB genes as targets for engineering stress-resilient crops through breeding and genetic modification.
KEYWORDS: DNA binding domain, MYB gene, plant stress, transcriptional regulation
1. Introduction
Plants are continuously confronted by a complex array of environmental factors, and simultaneous exposure to abiotic and biotic stresses significantly constrains their growth, productivity, and nutritional quality.1,2 These combined stress factors pose a major threat to global food security,3 underscoring the urgency to deepen our understanding of how plants perceive and respond to multiple stresses occurring concurrently throughout their life cycle.4,5 Recent progress in molecular biology has provided new insights into the extremely intricate mechanisms that govern the crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses, revealing how plants integrate diverse signals to mount coordinated defense strategies.6,7 To survive under these adverse conditions, plants have evolved sophisticated signaling networks that rapidly detect external stimuli and initiate adaptive responses.8,9 Central to these networks are transcription factors (TFs), which act as master regulators, orchestrating the activity of genes involved in stress responses. Emerging evidence demonstrates that TFs play a key role in mediating the interplay between abiotic and biotic stress pathways, allowing plants to fine-tune their responses to complex environmental challenges.9,10 TFs are regulated at multiple levels, including transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels, in response to fluctuating environmental conditions.11–13 These regulatory mechanisms enable transcription factors to precisely modulate target gene expression, facilitating plant adaptation to multiple concurrent stresses.10,14 Since TFs control many genes involved in both stress responses and development,14–16 they are key players in the networks that regulate plant stress adaptation.17 Furthermore, hormonal signaling pathways, such as those involving abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, and brassinosteroids, closely interact with TF-mediated networks, further enhancing the plant’s ability to integrate environmental and endogenous cues.18,19 These findings suggest that TFs not only integrate environmental signals but also help coordinate hormonal responses, enabling plants to mount effective defense and adaptation strategies under challenging conditions.9,20
Various TF families such as WRKY, MYB, NAC, bZIP, AP2/ERF, CBF, and bHLH are prominently recognized for their roles in controlling vital activities such as cell morphogenesis, stress signal transduction, and hormone-mediated responses.21–27 Among these families, the MYB TFs represent one of the major groups. They are characterized by conserved structural features including the DNA-binding domain (DBD), transcriptional regulatory domain (TRD), oligomerization domain (OD), and nuclear localization signal (NLS).28,29 The N-terminal MYB DBD is formed by one to four imperfectly conserved repeats, each covering 50–52 amino acids, which fold into a characteristic three α-helix structure.30,31 The second and third α-helices form a helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif, which is stabilized by a hydrophobic core containing three regularly spaced residues, typically tryptophan. The third α-helix, referred to as the recognition helix, engages directly with the major groove of the DNA molecule.32 This modular structure allows MYB TFs to precisely control the expression of genes essential for plant growth, development, and adaptation to stress.33 Based on homology to animal c-MYB’s R1-R3 repeats, plant MYBs are classified into four groups: 1 R-MYB/MYB-related, 2 R-MYB/R2R3-MYB, 3 R-MYB/R1R2R3-MYB, and 4 R-MYB, with R2R3-MYB being the most abundant and functionally diverse subclass across species (Fig. 1).34,35 The functional breadth of MYBs was first highlighted by the cloning of ZmMYBC1 in maize,36 followed by discoveries in Arabidopsis thaliana,37 rice (Oryza sativa),38 soybean (Glycine max),39 and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris),40 revealing dramatic lineage-specific expansions from 69 members in Prunus avium29 to 680 in Brassica napus.41 Despite their numerical dominance, R2R3-MYBs R2R3-MYB proteins, present in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants, exhibit conserved roles in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, glucosinolate metabolism, and stress adaptation, underscoring their evolutionary significance (Table 1).33,60,61 Several previous reviews have addressed the roles of MYB transcription factors, primarily focusing on their involvement in plant development (e.g., cell differentiation, organ formation) and metabolic pathways such as flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis.62,63 Other works have summarized MYB functions related to specific stress responses, including drought and pathogen resistance, often emphasizing individual species or pathways.64,65 However, existing reviews tend to treat these functions in isolation, lacking a comprehensive integration of MYB structural diversity with their multi-layered regulatory roles across diverse stress conditions and species. In contrast, this review innovatively synthesizes recent advances in MYB structural features, their contributions to complex multi-stress regulatory networks, and cross-species conservation patterns. By bridging developmental, metabolic, and stress-related functions, we provide a holistic perspective that highlights MYBs as central coordinators of plant adaptation mechanisms. This integrative approach not only advances fundamental understanding but also provides a strategic roadmap for future research and crop engineering, particularly in developing stress-resilient crops to address agricultural challenges in China.
Figure 1.

The figure illustrates the structural organization of MYB transcription factors (TFs), emphasizing the conserved DNA-binding domain and the transcriptional regulatory region. The DNA-binding domain, located at the N-terminal, typically consists of one to four imperfect repeat motifs (R1, R2, R3, or R4), each comprising three α-helices (H1, H2, H3), with “T” representing the β-turn. These repeats are characterized by conserved tryptophan residues and follow consensus sequences such as W-(X19)-W-(X19)-W or F-(X18)-W-(X18)-W. W denotes tryptophan, F phenylalanine, I isoleucine, and X any amino acid. Based on the number and arrangement of repeats, MYB TFs are categorized into four major subgroups: 1R-MYB (MYB-related), 2R-MYB (R2R3-MYB), 3R-MYB (R1R2R3-MYB), and 4R-MYB. The 1R-MYB subgroup contains a single repeat (either R1/2 or R3), 2R-MYBs contain R2 and R3 repeats and are the most prevalent in plants, 3R-MYBs have all three repeats (R1, R2, R3), and 4R-MYBs consist of four R-like domains. These structural variations contribute to the functional diversity of MYB TFs in regulating plant development, secondary metabolism, and responses to environmental stresses.
Table 1.
Distribution and characterization of MYB transcription factor (TF) genes across various plant species.
| Species | Gene name | Number of total genes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phaeodactylum tricornutum | PtMYB | 26 | 42 |
| Gossypium hirsutum | GhMYB | 646 | 43 |
| Acer rubrum | ArMYB | 393 | 44 |
| Solanum tuberosum L. | StMYB | 158 | 45 |
| Cocos nucifera | CnMYB | 214 | 46 |
| Elaeis guineensis | EgMYB | 159 | 47 |
| Ipomoea batatas | IbMYB | 296 | 48 |
| Ipomoea trifida | ItMYB | 430 | |
| Ipomoea triloba | ItMYB | 411 | |
| Ipomoea nil | InMYB | 291 | |
| Ipomoea purpurea | IpMYB | 226 | |
| Ipomoea cairica | IcMYB | 281 | |
| Ipomoea aquatic | IaMYB | 277 | |
| Cucurbita moschata | CmoMYB | 175 | 49 |
| Curcuma wenyujin | CwMYB | 88 | 50 |
| Sorghum bicolor | SbMYB | 210 | 51 |
| Liriodendron chinense | LchiMYB | 190 | 52 |
| Melaleuca alternifolia | MaMYB | 219 | 53 |
| Capsicum annuum | CaMYB | 235 | 54 |
| Panax notoginseng | PnMYB | 123 | 55 |
| Pennisetum glaucum | PgMYB | 1133 | 56 |
| Chrysanthemum seticuspe | CsMYB | 162 | 57 |
| Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium | ClMYB | 220 | |
| Chrysanthemum ×morifolium | CmMYB | 722 | |
| Helianthus annuus | HaMYB | 386 | |
| Lactuca sativa | LsMYB | 280 | |
| Ziziphus mauritiana | ZmMYB | 56 | 58 |
| Ziziphus jujuba | ZjMYB | 60 | |
| Morella rubra | MrMYB | 174 | 59 |
2. Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation
The critical functional mechanisms of MYB TFs in plants are largely mediated by their conserved R2R3 DNA-binding domain, which facilitates precise recognition and binding to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the promoters of target genes.22,66 Upon binding to these motifs, MYB proteins recruit various co-regulatory complexes, including histone acetyltransferases and chromatin remodelers, that modify chromatin structure to facilitate or repress transcription.66,67 This dynamic modulation of chromatin accessibility allows MYB factors to function as potent transcriptional activators or repressors depending on developmental cues or environmental stimuli.68,69 A distinctive feature of plant MYB TFs is their capacity to assemble into combinatorial complexes with basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and WD40 proteins. The MBW complex exemplifies this, acting as a key modulator of essential processes such as flavonoid biosynthesis, secondary cell wall development, and responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses.70,71 Moreover, plant MYB activity is finely tuned by post-translational modifications, alternative splicing, and interaction with co-repressors like TOPLESS, enabling rapid and context-specific transcriptional reprogramming.72,73 By employing these diverse regulatory mechanisms, MYB transcription factors function as central integrators of internal developmental signals and external environmental stimuli, orchestrating the precise regulation of gene networks vital for plant growth, adaptation, and survival.74,75
2.1. MYB TFs and Their Interactions with Regulatory Upstream and Downstream Factors
MYB TFs serve as master regulators of gene expression, precisely modulating transcriptional programs through specific binding to cis-acting elements in target gene promoters. This molecular mechanism enables MYB TFs to orchestrate diverse biological processes critical for plant growth, development, and environmental adaptation.22 This direct DNA binding enables MYB TFs to function as molecular switches that either activate or repress transcriptional programs. MYB transcription factors are classified into various sub-groups based on their DNA-binding domains and conserved motifs.76 Certain sub-groups predominantly function as activators, while others act as repressors.77 For instance, many repressor MYBs contain conserved repression motifs such as the EAR motif (LxLxL or DLNxxP), which are absent in activators.78 Both activators and repressors often bind to similar MYB recognition elements (MREs) within promoter regions. However, their regulatory effects depend on additional factors such as co-factor recruitment and chromatin context.33 To determine whether an unknown MYB acts as an activator or repressor, researchers typically analyze its sequence for activation or repression motifs.79 They also perform phylogenetic comparisons with characterized MYBs, conduct transactivation assays using reporter genes, and study the expression changes of downstream targets upon MYB overexpression or knockout.80 In Arabidopsis, AtMYB73 interacts with the promoter regions of actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF) genes. This interaction suppresses their transcription and thereby enhances actin filament stability to regulate cytoskeletal dynamics.75 In rice, OsMYB30 activates transcription of OsPAL6 and OsPAL8. This elevates phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) levels and promotes lignin and salicylic acid accumulation, enhancing resistance against the brown plant-hopper (Nilaparvata lugens).81 Similarly, overexpression of PaMYB9A1/2 from Phalaenopsis aphrodite in tobacco directly upregulates genes involved in cuticular wax synthesis and cell wall biosynthesis. This leads to increased wax deposition, improved leaf glossiness, and reinforced protection against water loss and pathogens.82 These compelling examples demonstrate the remarkable precision of MYB transcription factors in reprogramming transcriptional networks through specific cis-element recognition.22 This targeting mechanism is fundamental to plant development and environmental responsiveness.75
Beyond direct DNA binding, MYB TF activity is intricately regulated through interactions with upstream proteins. These proteins modulate their binding affinity and transcriptional outcomes, thereby fine-tuning plant phenotypes.32 In this context, “upstream proteins” refers to transcription factors or signaling components that act earlier in regulatory cascades. They influence the activity, localization, or DNA-binding capacity of MYB TFs. These upstream regulators include photoreceptors, kinases, or other TFs that modify MYB function in response to environmental or developmental cues. Under ultraviolet (UV) light exposure, Arabidopsis AtMYB73/77 interacts with photoreceptors that inhibit its binding to auxin-responsive genes. This interaction suppresses hypocotyl elongation and lateral root formation.83 A hallmark of plant MYBs is the presence of an R3 repeat containing a bHLH-interaction domain. This domain facilitates the assembly of the MBW complex (MYB-bHLH-WD40).64 In Arabidopsis, AtMYB75, AtMYB90, and AtMYB113 (also known as PAP1, PAP2, and PAP3) interact with bHLH proteins GL3, EGL3, and TT8, along with the WD40 protein TTG1. Together, they assemble the MBW complex, which strongly effects the expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes including LDOX and DFR, thereby promoting pigment accumulation.84 MYB TFs can interact with a variety of other TFs and regulatory proteins. These interactions are mediated by specific domains within the MYB protein: the R3 repeat contains a conserved motif essential for bHLH partner binding, while other regions such as the C-terminal domain or intrinsically disordered regions mediate interactions with non-bHLH partners. This domain specificity allows MYBs to form diverse regulatory complexes. Furthermore, MYB TFs can form homo- and hetero-multimers to enhance regulatory specificity and strength. For instance, in Betula platyphylla, BplMYB46 forms heterodimers with several MYB partners (BplMYB6, 8, 11, 12, 13), collectively boosting their binding affinity to downstream genes. The co-expression of BplMYB46 and BplMYB13 leads to a significant upregulation of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and glutathione S-transferase, which collectively boost reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging capacity and strengthen stress tolerance.85 Through these complex interactions, MYB transcription factors function as key integrators within regulatory networks, modulating gene expression by both direct DNA binding and interactions with other proteins, which enables plants to finely regulate their growth, development in hazards conditions.
2.2. MYB Participates in Regulating Signaling Pathways
Plant hormone signaling pathways, such as those involving abscisic acid (ABA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and gibberellins (GAs), are intricately regulated by a complex network of transcription factors. These factors control gene expression in response to both developmental signals and environmental stimuli.86–88 Studies have demonstrated that the application of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to Citrus grandis juice sacs significantly downregulates the expression of CgMYB58 and its downstream lignin biosynthesis genes, whereas treatment with abscisic acid (ABA) enhances their transcription.89 Similarly, under ABA treatment, AchnABF2, AchnMYB41, and AchnMYB107 in kiwifruit are induced to bind to the ABA-responsive element (ABRE) and MYB recognition element (MRE) located in the promoter region of AchnFHT. This binding enables its transcriptional activation, thereby positively regulating lignin biosynthesis.90 In potatoes, the expression of 16 transcription factors, including StMYB1, is upregulated by IAA, GA3 and ABA. However, the expression of StMYB6 was significantly suppressed under all three hormone treatments, emphasizing the functional diversity of MYBs in plant hormone responses.45 Beyond these hormones, MYB transcription factors also participate in jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ETH) signaling pathways. For example, ETH and JA treatments upregulate the transcription level of RhMYB108 in Rosa hybrida. The induced RhMYB108 directly acts on the promoters of petal senescence-related genes RhNAC053, RhNAC092, and RhSAG113, thereby accelerating petal senescence.91 Similarly, in Citrus sinensis, SINAT4 and PIN5 are downstream target genes of CsMYB77. CsMYB77 transcriptionally represses SINAT4, delaying ABA signaling transduction for fruit ripening, while it activated PIN5, reducing free IAA content in the fruit and modulating auxin signaling. Therefore, CsMYB77 integrates abscisic acid (ABA) and auxin signaling pathways to modulate fruit ripening and determine fruit size.60
In addition to hormone signaling, MYB TFs participate in multiple other signaling cascades, such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, ROS signaling, and the phospholipase D/phosphatidic acid (PLD/PA) pathway, all of which play vital roles in plant under unfavorable condition.92 When cell membrane receptors perceive environmental signals, the MAPK cascade mediates phosphorylation reaction, transmitting the signal into the cell and regulating the expression of intracellular MYBs.93 These changes induce physiological and biochemical modifications in plants, thereby improving their capacity to respond and adapt to environmental variations.68 For example, in rice, the upstream kinase OsMAPK10 phosphorylates and activates OsRLM1, which subsequently binds directly to the promoter of the downstream gene OsCAD2, thereby modulating the biosynthesis of the secondary cell wall.94 Additionally, phosphatidylcholine is catalyzed by PLD to generate PA, which acts as a second messenger. PA phosphorylates and activates the downstream MAPK cascade, subsequently activating the target gene MYB. The activated MYB protein assembles into a complex with bHLH and WD40 partners, directly interacting with the promoters of flavonoid biosynthetic genes enhancing flavonoid production, decreasing intracellular ROS concentrations, and consequently improving plant stress tolerance.33
3. MYB Transcription Factors in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
Plants are continuously challenged by a diverse range of stress factors, including abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, temperature variations, nutrient deficiencies, and heavy metal toxicity, alongside biotic stresses like pathogen attacks and herbivore damage. These adverse conditions significantly impair plant growth, productivity, and overall quality.95,96 Recent studies have underscored the pivotal role of MYB TFs in directing plant responses to these stresses, particularly highlighting their contribution to enhancing tolerance against external stressors, which has garnered substantial research attention (Table 2).68 They regulate stress-responsive genes by binding to target regions of the promoter, thereby modulating their transcriptional activity.128 The key mechanisms through which MYB TFs confer stress tolerance include: (i) maintaining cellular ionic balance by adjusting the expression of transporters involved in Na+ and K+ homeostasis; (ii) alleviating oxidative stress by upregulating ROS-scavenging systems, thus protecting cellular membranes, proteins, and nucleic acids from oxidative damage; (iii) preserving water balance by enhancing water uptake or minimizing water loss, which supports osmotic stability during drought and other stress conditions; (iv) promoting the accumulation of osmo-protectants to mitigate hyperosmotic stress effects; and (v) modulating hormonal signaling pathways, particularly abscisic acid (ABA), to activate downstream adaptive responses essential for stress resilience.98,129
Table 2.
Role of MYB transcription factors in regulation of plant responses under abiotic stress conditions.
| Species | Gene name | Gene family | Target genes and sites | Function | Stress response | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabidopsis thaliana | AtMYB25 | R2R3-MYB | JAZ10, RD29a, DREB2C, SLAH1, | Activate downstream stress response genes | Salinity, Permeability, Abscisic acid |
97 |
| AtMYB37 | R2R3-MYB | RD22, COR15A, ABF2/3, PSII/I, RD29a, | Enhance PSII activity and regulate energy dissipation ratio | Salinity, Drought, Abscisic acid |
98 | |
| AtMYBS1 | MYB-related | MAX1 | Negative regulation of the one-legged gold lactone pathway | High temperature (-) | 99 | |
| AtMYB74 | R2R3-MYB | NIG1, MYB102, ERF53, HSFA6a, MYB90, MYB47 | Regulate downstream target genes after activation of auxin precursor IAM | Permeability, High temperature | 100 | |
| AtMYB12 | R2R3-MYB |
NCED, AAO, ZEP, ABA2, CAT, POD, SOD, P5CR, P5CS, LEA |
Increase the content of flavonoids in plants under stress conditions | Salinity, Drought, High temperature, Ultraviolet rays |
101 | |
| AtMYB71 | R2R3-MYB | ABA response genes | Regulating plant ABA response | Abscisic acid | 102 | |
| AtMYB94/96 | R2R3-MYB | KCR1, KCS1/2/6, CER1/3, WSD1 | Promote the biosynthesis of plant epidermal wax | Drought, Ultraviolet rays, Strong light | 103 | |
| Arachis hypogaea | AhMYB30 | MYB-related | KIN1, COR15a, RD29A, ABI2 | Upregulation of downstream stress-related gene expression involved in DREB/CBF and ABA signaling pathways | Low temperature, Salinity | 104 |
| Brassica campestris | BcMYB111 | R2R3-MYB | F3H, FLS1 | Enhanced flavonoid biosynthesis after CBF transcriptional activation | Low temperature | 105 |
| Oryza sativa | OsMYBR57 | MYB-related | OsbZIPs regulated by interaction with OsHB22 | Activation of transcription factor bZIP after interaction with HB22 | Drought | 106 |
| OsMYB-R1 | MYB-related | CAT, SOD, GPX, ABRE, LEA, | Activate downstream stress-related genes | Drought, Chromium element, Salicylic acid, Abscisic acid, Jasmonic acid | 107 | |
| OsFLP | R2R3-MYB | NAC1/6, DST, peroxidase 24 precursor | Activate downstream related transcription factors | Salinity, Drought, Abscisic acid |
108 | |
| Gossypium hirsutum | GhMYB36 | R2R3-MYB | PR1 | Activate downstream related genes | Drought, Verticillium wilt disease | 109 |
| GhMYB102 | R2R3-MYB | NCED1, ZAT10 | Participate in regulating ABA biosynthesis and drought response gene expression | Drought | 110 | |
| Limonium bicolor | LbMYB48 | MYB-related | DIS3, CPC-like, SOSs, GSTs, RLKs | Regulating the expression of genes related to epidermal development and salt stress | Salinity | 111 |
| LbTRY | MYB-related | ZFP5, GL3, RHD6, LRL2/3, P5CS, RSL1, SOS1/2/3 | Upregulation of GL3/ZFP5 expression leads to competitive binding with the expressed product, altering the differentiation direction of transgenic plant epidermal cells, enhancing root hair development, and absorbing more Na+ | Salinity (-) | 112 | |
| Carya cathayensis | CcMYB12 | R2R3-MYB | C4H, CHI, F3H, ANR, ANS, DFR | Participate in anthocyanin synthesis pathway | Salinity, Drought, Acid |
113 |
| Hevea brasiliensis | HbMYB44 | R2R3-MYB | Homologous genes and interacting protein-encoding genes | Activate downstream stress-related genes | Salinity, Permeability, Abscisic acid, Drought, Methyl jasmonate, Gibberellin, Salicylic acid |
114 |
| Ipomoea batatas | IbMYB308 | R2R3-MYB | SOD, POD, APX, P5CS | Activate downstream stress-related genes | Salinity | 115 |
| IbMYB73 | R2R3-MYB | ABA2, ABI2, NCED3, AAO3, DREB1D, SnRK2.3, GER5, RD22, RD26, | Activation of ABA dependent negative regulatory factors transcription for adventitious root growth and stress tolerance express |
Salinity (-), Drought (-), Abscisic acid (-) | 116 | |
| Chenopodium glaucum | CgMYB1 | R2R3-MYB | NHX1, HAK5, SOS1, P5CS2, POD1, SOD, CBF1, bHLH001, COR15, COR47, | Enhance the physiological functions and stress-related gene expression of genetically modified plants | Salinity, Low temperature | 117 |
| Pisum sativum | PsFLP | R2R3-MYB | AAO3, CDKA1, CYCA2, SnRK2.3, CYCA3, NCED3, | Regulating stomatal formation, ABA synthesis, and signal transduction genes | Drought, Abscisic acid | 118 |
| Populus alba × Populus glandulosa | PagMYB205 | R2R3-MYB | Genes related to SOD, POD, CAT, and root vitality | Negative regulation of antioxidant enzyme activity and root vitality | Salinity (-) | 119 |
| PagMYB151 | R2R3-MYB | Proline biosynthesis genes | Together with co expressed transcription factors, it alters root structure, promotes proline accumulation, and reduces MDA content | Salinity | 120 | |
| V. labrusca × V. riparia | VhMYB2 | R2R3-MYB |
NHX1, NCED3, SOS1/2/3, P5CS1, SnRK2.6, CAT1 |
Activate downstream-related genes | Salinity, Drought | 121 |
| Capsicum annuum | CaDIM1 | MYB-related | OSR1, RAB18, NCED3 and stress responsive genes | Induced stress/ABA related gene expression | Drought, Abscisic acid | 122 |
| Fagopyrum tataricum | FtMYB11 | R2R3-MYB | ABA3, NCED3, CBF1, DREB2A, F3H, ANS, RD20, C4H, 4CL, DFR | Regulating the expression of genes associated with the ABA signaling pathway, drought response, and flavonoid biosynthesis | Salinity (-), Drought (-), Abscisic acid (-) | 123 |
| Apium graveolens | AgMYB5 | R2R3-MYB | CRTISO, LCYB, ABA1/2, NCED6, AAO3, ERD1, RD22, P5CS1, RD29 | Enhanced β-carotene biosynthesis and subsequently induced ABA synthesis | Oxidative damage, Drought | 124 |
| Setaria italica | SiMYB16 | MYB-related | FAR1, 4CL1, CSE, PAL, CYP87A3, NCED3, F5H, COMT | Modulating the biosynthesis of lignin, flavonoids, and suberin in plants | Salinity | 125 |
| Vitis amurensis | VaMYB14 | R2R3-MYB | ABA signaling genes, LTPs, CORs, POD, and CAT | Participating in the activation of ABA signaling components and the CBF-COR-independent expression of LTP3 | Salinity, Drought, Abscisic acid | 126 |
| Solanum lycopersicum | SlMYB41 | R2R3-MYB | SlHSP90.3 | Maintain the homeostasis of reactive oxygen species under heat stress | High temperature | 127 |
| Elaeis guineensis Jacq. | EgMYB111, EgMYB157 | R2R3-MYB | SnRK2.1, SnRK2.3, SnRK2.5 | Induced stress related gene expression | Salinity, Drought, Low temperature | 47 |
“”- indicates negative regulation.
3.1. Regulation of Salt Stress Tolerance by MYB TFs
Soil salinization has emerged as a significant global challenge to agriculture, driven by environmental degradation and improper irrigation practices, which adversely affect crop productivity.130 Salt stress disrupts seed germination, restricts water and nutrient uptake, and induces both ionic and osmotic stresses, collectively impairing normal plant growth and development.131 These stressors cause detrimental effects such as oxidative damage and ion toxicity, further compromising plant health.132 Extensive research has identified MYB as a key player in regulators in plant responses to salt stress, primarily through their involvement in the ABA signaling pathway.75 Under saline conditions, MYB proteins influence cell wall remodeling and regulate the expression of ion transporter genes, which are essential for maintaining osmotic balance and ion homeostasis. This regulatory role enables plants to adapt effectively to high salinity environments (Fig. 2).133
Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of the role of MYB transcription factors in plant responses to drought and salt stress. The diagram depicts the regulatory functions of MYB transcription factors (TFs) in plant stress responses, particularly under drought and salt stress conditions. MYB TFs are shown as central regulators of various stress-related pathways, including antioxidant enzyme activities (such as SOD, POD, and CAT), ROS accumulation, and osmotic balance. Blue line arrows (↑) represent the activation or upregulation of specific processes, while downward red arrows (↓) indicate suppression or downregulation. Whereas red T-bar (–) indicates inhibition of gene function or signaling pathways.
3.1.1. ABA-Dependent MYB Pathways in Salinity Stress
MYB transcription factors modulate plant salt tolerance primarily via ABA-dependent signaling pathways.22 In Fagopyrum tataricum, FtMYB22 interacts with ABA receptors RCAR1/2, destabilizing the RCAR-ABA-PP2C complex under salt stress. This interaction promotes PP2C binding to SnRK2.3, inhibiting its kinase activity and subsequent phosphorylation of downstream targets. It has been shown that FtMYB22 directly binds to promoter regions containing ABRE cis-elements, resulting in the downregulation of stress-responsive genes such as AtRD29A, AtRD29B, AtPP2CA, and AtRD22. This repression correlates with elevated levels of MDA, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and superoxide anions (O₂−) in transgenic plants, along with a delayed stomatal closure response. These findings suggest that FtMYB22 negatively regulates salt tolerance via an ABA-dependent signaling mechanism.134 Conversely, FtMYB30 has been reported to directly associate with ABA receptor proteins AtRCAR1, AtRCAR2, and AtRCAR3, thereby promoting the expression of ABA-responsive genes including RD29B and RD26. This interaction decreases the sensitivity of transgenic plants to salt and ABA, ultimately enhancing their tolerance to salt stress.135 MYB proteins can regulate ABA signaling homeostasis under salt stress by interacting with components of the ABA pathway. For example, MdMYB44-like, which is highly expressed in apple leaf guard cells, binds directly to the MBS element in the promoter of MdPP2CA, repressing its expression. This repression is strengthened through its association with the ABA receptor MdPYL8, leading to rapid accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA) during salt stress. However, increased ABA levels trigger MdPP2CA to interfere with the MdMYB44-like–MdPYL8 interaction, with all three components working together to maintain ABA signaling balance and thereby enhance plant tolerance to salt stress.136
3.1.2. MYB-Controlled Cell Wall Remodeling Under Salt Stress
MYBs are essential regulators of plant salt tolerance, in part by modulating the deposition and reinforcement of cell wall constituents, including lignin and cuticular layers.137 Through the regulation of cell wall composition, MYB transcription factors contribute to mitigating cell turgor disruption caused by salt-induced water deficit, thereby improving plant tolerance to salinity.138 For instance, in Arabidopsis plants overexpressing MdMYB46, this transcription factor directly binds to SMRE and M46RE motifs within the promoters of lignin biosynthetic genes, as well as to the promoter regions of key transcriptional activators including AtMYB58 and AtMYB63. It modulates lignin biosynthesis, increased cell wall mechanical strength, and facilitated the preservation of intracellular osmotic homeostasis, collectively enhancing salt tolerance in transgenic plants.75,139 Similarly, AtMYB49 acts as an activator of genes such as ASFT, MYB41, FACT, and CYP86B1. Overexpression of AtMYB49 in transgenic Arabidopsis led to the development of thicker leaf cuticles, which effectively alleviated osmotic stress induced by salinity.140 Furthermore, the MYB transcription factors MYB41, MYB53, MYB92, and MYB93 in Arabidopsis act as positive regulators of suberin biosynthesis in the cell wall. Concurrent mutations in these MYBs resulted in a marked decrease in suberin accumulation within the root endodermis, accompanied by increased water loss relative to wild-type plants, ultimately reducing salt tolerance.141 Conversely, certain MYB TFs act as negative regulators of lignin deposition during salt stress. For example, AtMYB3 possesses a C-terminal LNL(E/D)L repressor motif that directly binds to the promoter sites of C4H, PAL2, 4CL3, and COMT, suppressing their expression. This repression results in decreased lignin accumulation under saline conditions, heightened plant sensitivity to salt, and a consequent reduction in salt tolerance.142
3.1.3. Ion Homeostasis Regulation by MYBs in Saline Conditions
Salt stress leads to the excessive accumulation of Na+ in both roots and aerial tissues, eventually reaching toxic levels that disrupt the balance of intracellular ions.143 Research has shown that MYBs regulate the expression of ion transport-related genes, facilitating the compartmentalization of excess Na+ into vacuoles or its extrusion out of the cell, thereby enhancing the cytoplasmic K+/Na+ ratio.144 This response helps alleviate ionic toxicity caused by elevated Na+ levels, maintain cellular ion and redox homeostasis, and contribute to improved salt tolerance in the transgenic plants.145 For example, Studies in Beta vulgaris revealed that mutation of the MYB binding site in the BvNHX1 promoter abolished its transcriptional activity146 This indicated that MYB transcription factors participate in activating BvNHX1 expression under salt stress, accelerating Na+ compartmentalization into vacuoles and regulating sugar beet salt tolerance.147 Over-expression of SlMYB102 in Solanum lycopersicum significantly enhanced the transcription levels of genes such as SlSOS1, SlSOS2, SlNHX3, SlNHX4, and SlHAK5. By expelling excess Na+ from the cytoplasm, compartmentalizing it into vacuoles, and enhancing K+ uptake, transgenic tomato leaves and roots showed reduced Na+ levels and increased K+ content under salt stress. This contributes to maintaining the Na+/K+ balance in plants, thereby improving salt tolerance in transgenic lines.148 Likewise, during salt stress in Arabidopsis, AtMYB42 is phosphorylated and activated by MAPK4, enabling it to bind the promoter of SOS2 and enhance its transcription, which in turn leads to the activation of downstream SOS1. This process promotes the efflux of surplus Na+ ions from cells, thereby supporting ion homeostasis and enhancing the plant’s capacity to tolerate salt stress.149
3.2. MYB-Mediated Responses to Drought Stress
Drought is a major environmental stress that greatly affects plant growth, development, and overall yield.150 Prolonged water deficit leads to the peroxidation of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids within plant cells, rendering them inactive.151 Additionally, water loss causes osmotic imbalance in plant cells, severely disrupting physiological processes and normal metabolic functions.152,153 Research has shown that MYBs regulate plant responses to drought stress through multiple mechanisms, including enhancing ROS scavenging capacity,75 maintaining osmotic balance by accumulating small-molecule osmolytes, modifying root systems to improve water uptake,154 thickening leaf cuticles to reduce water loss,22 and participating in ABA-mediated regulation of stomatal movement in plant leaves (Fig. 2).22
3.2.1. MYB-Driven Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms Under Drought Stress
Abundant studies have highlighted the involvement of MYB TFs in strengthening plant antioxidant defense systems, which include enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants including β-carotene, glutathione, and carotenoids.155–157 These antioxidants help mitigate oxidative stress induced by water deficiency, thereby enhancing the plant’s drought tolerance (Fig. 2). For instance, the overexpression of VyMYB24 from Vitis yanshanesis in tobacco and ZmMYB3R from maize in Arabidopsis resulted in a marked increase in the expression of antioxidant enzyme genes such as SOD, POD, and catalase (CAT). This facilitated the efficient removal of O₂− and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) produced during osmotic stress, thereby improving drought tolerance in transgenic plants.158–160 conducted a comprehensive identification and characterization of the CcMYB gene family in Cajanus cajan, revealing that CcMYB107 expression is significantly induced by drought stress. Functional analysis demonstrated that OE-CcMYB107 enhances antioxidant enzyme activities, reduces peroxide accumulation, and significantly improves drought tolerance in transgenic plants compared to wild-type controls. Flavonoids, as important non-enzymatic antioxidants, effectively reduce ROS accumulation induced by drought stress.161 For example, CsMYB123 from Chaenomeles speciosa interacted with CsbHLH111 to activate the transcription of the anthocyanin biosynthesis gene CHI. Under drought conditions, CsMYB123 over-expression lines accumulated more anthocyanins than control, effectively mitigating ROS-induced damage, protecting membrane integrity, and enhancing drought tolerance.162 Conversely, RNA interference-mediated silencing of SlMYB50, SlMYB55 in tomato, and GhMYB3 in cotton enhances the transcriptional activation of 4CL, CHS, ANS, and ANR, leading to increased anthocyanin and proanthocyanin content, elevated antioxidant enzyme activity, and timely clearance of excess ROS in leaves and roots. This reduced oxidative toxicity to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, positively contributing to improved drought resistance.163–165
3.2.2. MYB Role in Osmotic Adjustment and Root Architecture in Drought Conditions
MYB TFs are key regulators of osmotic homeostasis within and outside plant cells, mainly by facilitating the accumulation of small-molecule osmolytes, remodeling root system architecture, and modifying cell wall properties.166 OE lines of IbMYB48 in Ipomoea batatas and AhMYB44–11 in Arachis hypogaea significantly upregulated the expression of osmotic stress-responsive genes such as LET14, P5CS, and DNH6. This led to the accumulation of soluble sugars and proline, maintaining osmotic balance and membrane integrity, thereby enhancing drought tolerance.167,168 Plant roots are critical for sensing soil moisture changes and absorbing water and nutrients. Under water deficit conditions, changes in root architecture help plants access deeper soil water, supporting normal growth and development.169 MYBs actively regulate root development under drought stress. For example, OsRRS1 in Oryza sativa binds to the promoter region of the auxin signaling repressor gene IAA3, suppressing its transcription and disrupting normal root development. Overexpression of OsRRS1 resulted in shorter lateral roots, reduced lateral root density, and smaller root volume, impairing water absorption and utilization efficiency, thus negatively regulating drought tolerance.170 Similarly, LbTRY from Limonium bicolor was upregulated under drought stress, activating the transcription of GL3/ZFP5 and competitively binding to its transcript. This interfered with the formation of the TTG1-GL3-GL1 complex, inhibiting trichome development while promoting root hair growth. This enhanced Na+ absorption but negatively impacted drought tolerance.112 Plants also modify cell wall composition and structure to maintain osmotic balance under drought stress. For instance, MdMYB46 in Malus domestica directly binds to the promoters of lignin metabolism regulatory genes MdMYB58 and MdMYB63, positively regulating lignin accumulation and improving osmotic stress tolerance.139 In Populus tomentosa, drought stress induced the expression of PtoMYB142, which enhanced the transcription of wax biosynthesis genes CER4 and KCS. This led to increased wax accumulation on leaf surfaces, significantly easing water loss and refining drought tolerance.171
3.2.3. Hormonal Crosstalk Modulated by MYBs During Drought Stress
MYBs participate in drought stress responses by modulating plant hormonal pathways. Particularly, ABA signaling induces ion efflux in guard cells, leading to stomatal closure, which minimizes water loss and thereby improves drought tolerance.172 For example, SiMYB75 in Sesamum indicum significantly upregulated ABA biosynthesis genes AtNCED3 and AtABA3 under drought stress. Overexpression of SiMYB75 in Arabidopsis increased endogenous ABA levels, activating drought-responsive genes RD29B and RD22 and mediating stomatal closure via AtOST1, reducing water loss and enhancing drought tolerance.173 Similarly, GhMYB44 in Gossypium hirsutum negatively regulates the expression of HAB1, ABI1, and PP2CA, promoting stomatal closure and improving drought tolerance.174 The overexpression of ZmMYB3R from maize in Arabidopsis promoted abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis, upregulated the expression of RD29A/B, ABF3, and ABA1 genes, expedited stomatal closure, decreased transpiration rates, and consequently enhanced drought tolerance.174 Brassinosteroids (BR) also improved drought tolerance by contributing to osmotic regulation. GmMYB14 in Glycine max bound to the AC cis-element in the GmBEN1 promoter. Under drought stress, the transcription of GmBEN1 was upregulated, accelerating BR catabolism and mitigating the inhibitory effect of BR signaling on drought responses, thereby enhancing drought tolerance.175
3.3. MYB Involvement in Temperature Stress Responses
3.3.1. myb-Driven Mechanisms Under Cold Stress
Low temperatures decrease the fluidity of plant cell membranes and impair enzyme activity, leading to the excessive accumulation of ROS, which prominently affects normal plant growth, development, and metabolic functions.176,177 MYBs participate in the response to cold stress by modulating both CBF-dependent and CBF-independent signaling pathways178,179 (Fig. 3). Research has shown that MYB regulates the expression levels of CBF transcription factors in the cold response pathway, which involves the inducer of CBF expression (ICE), CBF, and cold-regulated genes (COR), thereby affecting plant cold tolerance.180 Under cold stress, MbMYB4, MbMYB108, and MbMYBC1 in Malus baccata activated the transcription of CBF cold stress response pathway-related genes, including RD29a, COR15a, and CBF. This improved antioxidant system and proline content, thereby improving plant cold resistance.181–183 However, some MYB transcription factors also regulate plant sensitivity to cold through CBF-independent pathways.179,184 For example, BnaMYBL17 in Brassica napus binds to the promoter regions of PLC1, FLZ8, and KOIN, inhibiting their transcription and disrupting the balance between plant growth and cold response under cold conditions. Transgenic plants exhibit increased osmotic permeability, reduced soluble sugar and proline content, and enhanced sensitivity to cold, indicating that BnaMYBL17 negatively regulates plant cold tolerance.185 Additionally, the crosstalk between MYB and anthocyanin biosynthesis also affects the tolerance to low temperatures.186 Compared to controls, cold treatment significantly increased the expression of MYB-6 and LDOX in Daucus carota, along with a marked increase in anthocyanin content, including ferulic acid. This suggests that MYB-6 may play a role in enhancing anthocyanin content under cold stress.187
Figure 3.

Schematic illustration of MYB transcription factors involved in plant responses to various stresses, including heat, cold, biotic, and heavy metal stress. Each stress type triggers specific MYB genes that regulate downstream signaling pathways and stress-responsive genes. These MYBs enhance tolerance by promoting antioxidant activity, secondary metabolite synthesis, lignin deposition, hormonal signaling, and ion homeostasis. Key gene interactions and stress outcomes are summarized. Colored arrows indicate functional pathways under each stress condition.
3.3.2. myb-Driven Mechanisms Under Heat Stress
Heat stress causes protein misfolding and leads to the unnecessary accumulation of ROS in plant cells.188,189 MYB transcription factors also participate in regulating a series of heat stress response genes to mitigate the damage caused by high temperatures190,191 (Fig. 3). Extensive research has shown that 12, 8, and 12 MYB family members in Dendrobium catenatum, Liriodendron chinense, and Pearl millet, respectively, play crucial roles in responding to high-temperature stress by reducing ROS levels and enhancing plant thermotolerance.52,56,192 Additionally, MYB transcriptionally regulates heat shock factors (HSFs), providing an effective pathway for plants to respond to heat stress. For example, AtMYB5 and AtTT2 in A. thaliana bind to the SIIE motif in the HSF2 promoter, upregulating HSF2 expression, enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity, and improving tolerance to high-temperature stress.193
3.4. MYB Functions in Nutrient and Heavy Metal Stress
3.4.1. MYB Regulation of Nutrient Uptake and Allocation
MYB TFs are critical regulators of plant root nutrient uptake capacity, particularly under conditions of nutrient deficiency.194 Phosphorus (P) is a vital element for plant growth and development.195 Phosphorus deficiency can hinder crop growth and decrease yield.196 MYBs are involved in mediating plant responses to low phosphorus stress197,198 (Fig. 3). For instance, PuMYB40 in Populus ussuriensis interacts with PuWRKY75 to enhance the transcription of low phosphorus-responsive genes PuLRP1 and PuERF003, thereby facilitating the development of adventitious roots.199 Similarly, MYB-like transcription factors, known as phosphate starvation response (PHR) proteins, are key components of phosphorus signaling and play a role in processes such as metal element absorption.200 Overexpression of GmPHR1 from soybean significantly increased the number of lateral roots and root nodules, enhanced the symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability of rhizobia, and promotes the absorption of nitrogen and phosphorus, thereby increasing seed yield.201 Boron (B) is an essential micronutrient for plant growth, and its deficiency can result in poor plant development.202 MYBs also contribute to maintaining normal growth and development under boron-deficient conditions.203 In Pyrus betulaefolia, the expression of nine MYBs was significantly upregulated under short-term boron deficiency. These genes enhanced the root’s ability to absorb boron and integrated ABA and JA signaling pathways to regulate the plant’s response to boron stress.204
3.4.2. MYB Transcription Factors in Heavy Metal Homeostasis
Heavy metals can severely affect plant growth and development by causing an excessive buildup of ROS, lowering photosynthetic efficiency, and damaging cell membranes.188,205,206 Furthermore, heavy metals may infiltrate the human body via the food chain, causing long-term and often irreversible damage.207 Research has shown that MYBs can enhance plant tolerance to heavy metals by regulating the absorption of these elements or mitigating the oxidative damage they cause208,209 (Fig. 3). Under aluminum (Al) stress, OsMYB30 functions as a negative regulator of Al tolerance in rice. By binding to the promoter of Os4CL5, it reduces the accumulation of p-coumaric acid (PA) in the cell wall, thereby increasing the binding of Al3 + to the cell wall and significantly lowering Al tolerance. However, the OsMYB30-Os4CL5 pathway is negatively regulated by the upstream factor OsART1, which alleviates the aluminum-sensitive phenotype caused by OsMYB30.210 In contrast, AtMYB103 from Arabidopsis functions as a positive regulator of aluminum tolerance by upregulating the expression of TBL27, a gene involved in cell wall xyloglucan O-acetylation. This modification decreases Al3 + binding to the cell wall, thereby substantially improving aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants.211 MYBs also play a role in regulating the antioxidant capacity of plants under heavy metal stress.75 For instance, overexpression of GsMYB7 from Glycine soja significantly increases the total root surface area of transgenic plants, reduces the accumulation of Al3 + in root tips, and upregulates the expression of genes encoding glutathione peroxidase (GPX), protein kinases (PK), and cytochrome P450 (CYP450), thus mitigating oxidative damage and enhancing aluminum tolerance.212 Similarly, overexpression of TmMYB16/123 from Taxus media and SbMYB15 from Salicornia brachiata in transgenic plants exposed to Cd2 + and Ni2 + effectively inhibits the transcription of heavy metal ion transporters TmMTP1/11, significantly limits the absorption of Cd2 + and Ni2 +, reduces ROS accumulation, and increases the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, and CAT, thereby enhancing plant tolerance to heavy metals.213,214 Additionally, MsMYB741 from Medicago sativa influences the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in transgenic plants, resulting in the accumulation of antioxidant flavonoids that effectively scavenge intracellular ROS and positively regulated aluminum tolerance.215
3.5. MYB Regulatory Role in Plant Defense Against Biotic Stress
Apart from their critical regulatory role in plant responses to abiotic stress, the MYB family is also extensively involved in regulating plant immune functions under various biotic stresses, enhancing plant defense mechanisms against pathogenic microorganisms (fungi, bacteria, viruses) and herbivorous insects.216 Plant MYBs primarily confer tolerance to biotic stress by modulating leaf cuticle thickness and participating in the regulation of multiple plant hormone signaling pathways (Fig. 3).
3.5.1. Strengthening Cell Wall Barriers: Lignin and Cuticle Deposition
The plant cell wall acts as the primary natural barrier against pathogen invasion.217 Modulating the components of the cell wall can strengthen the plant’s defense response to pathogenic attacks.218,219 In many plants, MYBs have been found to play key role in the biosynthesis of lignin, cuticular wax, and other substances, as well as the response to pathogen infection.75,220 Signification has been proven to positively correlate with plant disease resistance by restricting the movement of pathogens, thereby preventing their spread.221 In A. thaliana, AtMYB15 activates lignin biosynthesis genes (PAL, C4H, 4CL, and COMT), leading to increased lignin content, which restricts Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 to the infection site and triggers the plant’s immune response.222 In Chrysanthemum morifolium, CmMYB13 and CmMYB19 are induced by aphid attack and bind to AC elements in the promoters of lignin biosynthesis genes (PAL, C4H, 4CL, HCT, and CCR), enhancing lignin accumulation to limit aphid growth and reproduction on chrysanthemum.223,224 Similarly, the R2R3-type MYB transcription factor GhODO1, identified in cotton, is induced by Verticillium dahliae and directly activates the transcription of Gh4CL and GhCAD3, enhancing cotton’s resistance to Verticillium dahliae.225 In maize, ZmMYB94 and ZmGL2 regulate the elongation of fatty acid chains, which are precursors of wax on the silk surface, and contribute to cuticle deposition, thereby enhancing resistance to Fusarium verticillioides.226
3.5.2. myb-Mediated Activation of Biotic Stress Signaling Pathways
Polysaccharide signal transduction is also an essential mechanism for plants to manage biotic stress.227,228 In cotton, GhMYB4 binds to the GhLac1 promoter, inhibits its expression and significantly increases the content of oligogalacturonides in the cell wall. Membrane surface receptors recognize polysaccharide signals and further stimulate the immune system. Thus, GhMYB4 enhances resistance to Verticillium dahliae through polysaccharide signaling.229 Crosstalk between single or multiple plant hormone signaling pathways is also vital in plant responses to biotic stress.230,231 In Triticum urartu, TuMYB46L functions as a transcriptional repressor of TuACO3, reducing the increase in ethylene (ETH) synthesis triggered by Blumeria graminis infection. Silencing TuMYB46L significantly enhances wheat’s tolerance to Blumeria graminis. The TuMYB46L-TuACO3 module promotes wheat’s defense against Blumeria graminis by regulating ETH biosynthesis.232 In blood orange, CsMYB96, and in apple, MdMYB73 directly activate the expression of salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis genes (CBP60g, PAL, EDS, and PAD) and SA signaling genes (PR1/5), boosting SA biosynthesis, reducing ROS levels at fungal infection sites, and triggering programmed cell death. Additionally, MdWRKY31 interacts with MdMYB73 to promote the stimulation of transcription of target genes, improving transgenic plant resistance to Penicillium italicum, Botrytis cinerea, and Botryosphaeria dothidea.233,234
4. Regulatory Roles of MYB TFs in Secondary Metabolism
The co-evolution of plants with their environments has driven the diversification and production of a wide array of secondary metabolites, which are fundamental for plant adaptation and survival.235 These metabolites encompass monolignols, phenolic acids, stilbenes, and various flavonoids-including anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, flavanones, flavonols, and isoflavonoids, that play indispensable roles in plant defense, signaling, and environmental adaptation.33,236–239 Beyond their defensive functions against pathogenic microbes, these secondary metabolites also contribute broadly to the regulation of plant metabolic pathways.240 Key components that reinforce mechanical strength, such as cell wall constituents, signaling molecules, pigments, UV-absorbing compounds, and phytoalexins are vital in modulating plant responses to diverse biotic and abiotic stresses.241 Among the transcriptional regulators, MYB (Myeloblastosis) transcription factors represent one of the largest and most significant families in plants, critically governing gene expression.242 Their role in secondary metabolite biosynthesis has been extensively highlighted, underscoring their functional importance in plant metabolic networks.243 Furthermore, the evolutionary conservation of MYB TF structures and functions across plants, yeast, and mammals emphasizes their essential regulatory roles across kingdoms.244 Current studies on MYB TF-mediated regulation of secondary metabolism have largely focused on economically important crops such as rice, apple, and soybean.245
Several MYB TFs have been identified as key modulators of specific secondary metabolic pathways. For example, VcMYB4a in Vaccinium corymbosum,246 PvMYB4a in Panicum virgatum,247 and ZmMYB31 and ZmMYB42 in Zea mays,248 are known as repressors of lignin biosynthesis. In Malus domestica, MYB TFs such as MdMYB1, MdMYB3, and MdMYBA regulate the biosynthesis and accumulation of red anthocyanin pigments in fruit peel.245 In Arabidopsis thaliana, AtMYB111, AtMYB12, and AtMYB11 individually activate genes encoding key flavonol biosynthetic enzymes-including flavonol synthase (FLS), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), chalcone isomerase (CHI), and chalcone synthase (CHS), which enhance the plant’s resilience to various stresses.249 Structurally, MYB TFs typically contain one to four imperfect repeat motifs within their DNA-binding domains, categorizing them into four subgroups: 1 R-MYB, 2 R-MYB, 3 R-MYB, and 4 R-MYB.28,248 These factors regulate a broad spectrum of plant functions, including cellular morphogenesis, metabolic processes, and environmental stress adaptation.250 In Dendrobium candidum, 117 2 R-MYB genes have been identified, with nine linked specifically to heat stress response.245 Under saline stress, multiple MYB TFs such as DoMYB28, DoMYB29, DoMYB54, DoMYB75, DoMYB78, DoMYB81, and DoMYB111 are upregulated, indicating their involvement in stress tolerance.245 In Betula platyphylla, BplMYB46 interacts with GT-box, E-box, and TC-box motifs in promoters of stress-responsive genes including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), as demonstrated by co-expression reporter assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation in Nicotiana tabacum.251 These genes are critical for secondary cell wall biosynthesis and contribute to stress resilience.243 In addition, MYB transcription factors are key contributors to flavonoid biosynthesis, influencing plant development by interacting with hormonal pathways, responding to environmental cues, engaging with microRNAs, and forming complexes with other transcription factors. Through these interactions, they integrate into intricate regulatory networks that coordinate growth and stress responses in plants22,252 (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.

Schematic illustration of plant response mechanisms to biotic and abiotic stresses, highlighting the role of MYB transcription factors in regulating secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Environmental stimuli such as drought, salinity, cold, pathogens, and herbivores activate complex signaling pathways involving PAMPs, DAMPs, MAPKs, ROS, NO, and Ca2 +. These pathways are modulated by phytohormones (SA, JA, ABA, ET, GAs, auxin) and exogenous elicitors, leading to the activation of key transcription factors including MYB, WRKY, bHLH, NAC, and AP2/ERF. MYBs, classified into 1R-, 2R-, 3R-, and 4R-MYBs based on their DNA-binding domain repeats, play a central role in modulating the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis and accumulation of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenes, and lignin, thereby enhancing plant stress tolerance and defense.
5. Research Gaps, Technical Challenges, and Future Directions
Despite significant advances in understanding the roles of MYB transcription factors (TFs) in plant stress responses, several critical gaps continue to limit their full exploitation in crop improvement.253 A major obstacle is the functional redundancy and genetic compensation among MYB family members, which share highly conserved DNA-binding domains and overlapping target genes. This redundancy often masks phenotypic effects in knockout or silencing studies, complicating the elucidation of specific MYB functions.254,255 Additionally, MYB transcription factors display functional diversity across species, tissues, and developmental stages, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this context-dependent regulation remain unclear.75,254 The comprehensive interaction networks and post-translational modifications regulating MYB activity under stress are still underexplored. Moreover, integration of MYB-mediated transcriptional regulation with hormone signaling, epigenetic modifications, and other transcription factor families during multi-stress responses requires further investigation.68,255 Emerging evidence also suggests that MYBs may participate in non-canonical regulatory pathways such as RNA metabolism and epigenetic regulation, but these roles remain largely uncharacterized.28,68,255
Technical challenges further restrict progress in MYB research. Traditional gene knockout or RNA interference approaches often fail to reveal clear MYB functions due to redundancy.75,255 However, advanced genome editing tools like CRISPR/Cas multiplexing hold promise for overcoming this challenge. Detailed expression profiling at single-cell or tissue-specific levels under dynamic stress conditions is limited, restricting precise functional annotation.256 Functional characterization is heavily biased toward model plants such as Arabidopsis and rice, with limited validation in economically important crops, especially under field conditions. Additionally, the complexity of multi-stress and multi-signal integration complicates research, as most studies focus on single stress conditions, whereas natural environments impose combined stresses.257
In addition to the well-established roles of MYBs, growing evidence suggests many novel and uncharacterized functions remain to be discovered.258 Certain MYB members may participate in non-canonical regulatory pathways, including RNA metabolism, epigenetic modifications, or cross-talk with hormone signaling beyond the classical ABA, JA, and SOS pathways.68 Exploring these potential roles could uncover new layers of gene regulation and stress adaptation in plants, opening exciting avenues for future research.259 Some MYB proteins, such as AtMYB44, AtMYB15, and OsMYB30, have emerged as central regulatory hubs involved in multiple physiological and stress-related processes, including abiotic and biotic stress responses, growth, and development.245 These multifunctional MYBs represent promising candidates for breeding programs aimed at enhancing crop resilience and productivity. However, their pleiotropic effects, such as developmental delays or dwarfism, necessitate careful evaluation and precise genetic manipulation to avoid undesirable phenotypes.75,254,260
To address current gaps and harness the full potential of MYBs, future research should emphasize comprehensive functional genomics approaches using CRISPR/Cas-mediated multiplex gene editing combined with transcriptomics and proteomics to dissect gene family redundancy and reveal unique versus overlapping functions.254 Elucidation of MYB regulatory networks through chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), yeast two-hybrid systems, bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC), and protein modification analyses will be crucial to mapping interactomes and regulatory circuits under various stresses.261 High-resolution expression profiling using single-cell RNA sequencing and tissue-specific analyses under dynamic stress conditions will refine functional annotation. Integrating multi-omics data with computational modeling will help unravel MYB-mediated cross-talk among hormonal, metabolic, and stress signaling pathways.262 Expanding research to diverse crop species and validating MYB functions in realistic agricultural environments is essential for translational applications.263 Investigating emerging non-canonical functions of MYBs in RNA metabolism and epigenetic regulation, along with developing tissue-specific and inducible expression systems, will enable precise genetic engineering while minimizing pleiotropic effects.260 Ultimately, leveraging these insights through breeding and biotechnological approaches will facilitate engineering crops with enhanced tolerance to combined abiotic and biotic stresses, improving yield and resilience to climate change. Addressing these priorities will be pivotal for advancing sustainable agriculture and food security.264
6. Conclusion
MYB transcription factors constitute a pivotal family of regulatory proteins that coordinate plant responses to diverse environmental challenges, including salinity, drought, temperature extremes, nutrient deficiencies, heavy metal toxicity, pathogen attacks and pest infestations. Through specific binding to promoter regions, MYBs regulate complex gene networks involved in maintaining ionic and osmotic balance, enhancing antioxidant defenses, remodeling cell walls, and modulating hormone signaling pathways such as abscisic acid (ABA). These multifaceted roles enable plants to adapt effectively to adverse environmental conditions by preserving cellular integrity, optimizing water use, and activating defense mechanisms. Research has demonstrated that MYBs can act as both positive and negative regulators depending on the stress context, underscoring their intricate and dynamic functions. Additionally, MYBs are integral to nutrient uptake, heavy metal detoxification, and immune responses through regulation of lignification, cuticle formation, and hormone-mediated signaling. Despite substantial progress, many MYB family members remain functionally uncharacterized, and the complexity of their regulatory networks, including interactions with other transcription factors and involvement in epigenetic and non-canonical pathways, requires further investigation. Challenges such as gene redundancy and context-dependent activity highlight the need for precise functional dissection. Ultimately, leveraging the regulatory potential of MYB transcription factors through advanced genomics and biotechnological approaches offers promising avenues for engineering stress-resilient crops, which is essential for ensuring sustainable agriculture and food security amid increasing environmental challenges.
Acknowledgments
Conceptualization: M.I, Q.W; writing-original draft: M.I; review and editing: Q.W and G.C; supervision: L.Z. and C.G; project administration: L.Z. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication
Funding Statement
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [32460412].
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
References
- 1.Zhang H, Zhu J, Gong Z, Zhu JK.. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(2):104–19. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Muhammad M, Wahab A, Waheed A, Hakeem KR, Mohamed HI, Basit A, Toor MD, Liu Y-H, Li L, Li W-J.. Navigating climate change: exploring the dynamics between plant–soil microbiomes and their impact on plant growth and productivity. Global Change Biol. 2025;31(2):e70057. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sarwar S. Consequences of land utilization, agriculture and water to handle the food security issues. Land Degrad Dev. 2025;36(6):1962–76. doi: 10.1002/ldr.5475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jiang Z, van Zanten M, Sasidharan R. Mechanisms of plant acclimation to multiple abiotic stresses. Commun Biol. 2025;8(1):655. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08077-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang LN, Wang WC, Liao K, Xu LJ, Xie DX, Xie RH, Xiao S. Survival mechanisms of plants under hypoxic stress: physiological acclimation and molecular regulation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2025;67(3):440–54. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Varadharajan V, Rajendran R, Muthuramalingam P, Runthala A, Madhesh V, Swaminathan G, Murugan P, Srinivasan H, Park Y, Shin H, et al. Multi-omics approaches against abiotic and biotic stress—a review. Plants. 2025;14(6):865. doi: 10.3390/plants14060865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saleem MH, Noreen S, Ishaq I, Saleem A, Khan KA, Ercisli S, Anas M, Khalid A, Ahmed T, Hassan A, et al. Omics technologies: unraveling abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms for sustainable crop improvement. J Plant Growth Regul. 2025;44(7):4165–87. doi: 10.1007/s00344-025-11674-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nykiel M, Gietler M, Fidler J, Prabucka B, Rybarczyk-Płońska A, Graska J, Boguszewska-Mańkowska D, Muszyńska E, Morkunas I, Labudda M. Signal transduction in cereal plants struggling with environmental stresses: from perception to response. Plants. 2022;11(8):1009. doi: 10.3390/plants11081009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nawaz M, Sun J, Shabbir S, Khattak WA, Ren G, Nie X, Bo Y, Javed Q, Du D, Sonne C. A review of plants strategies to resist biotic and abiotic environmental stressors. Sci Total Environ. 2023;900:165832. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thilakarathne AS, Liu F, Zou Z. Plant signaling hormones and transcription factors: key regulators of plant responses to growth, development, and stress. Plants. 2025;14(7):1070. doi: 10.3390/plants14071070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roy D, Sadanandom A. Sumo mediated regulation of transcription factors as a mechanism for transducing environmental cues into cellular signaling in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(6):2641–64. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03723-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sahil KR, Patra A, Mehta S, Abdelmotelb K, Lavale SA, Expression and regulation of stress-responsive genes in plants under harsh environmental conditions. Harsh Environ Plant Resilience: Mol Funct Aspects. 2021:25–44. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-65912-7_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li H, Chen N, Zhang H, Xu D. Multidimensional regulation of transcription factors: decoding the comprehensive signals of plant secondary metabolism. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1522278. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1522278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Manna M, Thakur T, Chirom O, Mandlik R, Deshmukh R, Salvi P. Transcription factors as key molecular target to strengthen the drought stress tolerance in plants. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021;172(2):847–68. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hrmova M, Hussain SS. Plant transcription factors involved in drought and associated stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5662. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guo X, Ullah A, Siuta D, Kukfisz B, Iqbal S. Role of WRKY transcription factors in regulation of abiotic stress responses in cotton. Life. 2022;12(9):1410. doi: 10.3390/life12091410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shakespear S, Sivaji M, Kumar V, Arumugam Pillai M, Wani SH, Penna S, Yasin JK. Navigating through harsh conditions: Coordinated networks of plant adaptation to abiotic stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2025;44(4):1396–414. doi: 10.1007/s00344-023-11224-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wei H, Cao Y, Xu T, Yang P, Zhou X, Liu G, Lian B, Zhong F, Zhang J. Comprehensive analysis of the SmPIN gene family in Salix matsudana: roles in growth, development, and stress adaptation. Tree Genet Genomes. 2025;21(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s11295-025-01693-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Akter MB, Li J, Lv X, Saand MA, Mehvish A, Sayed MA, Yang Y.. Identification of key genes and signaling pathways in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) under drought stress via comparative transcriptome analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06554-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li S, Khoso MA, Xu H, Zhang C, Liu Z, Wagan S, Dinislam K, Liu L. Wrky transcription factors (TFs) as key regulators of plant resilience to environmental stresses. Curr Perspect Agronom. 2024;14(10):2421. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14102421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Khoso MA, Hussain A, Ritonga FN, Ali Q, Channa MM, Alshegaihi RM, Meng Q, Ali M, Zaman W, Brohi RD, et al. Wrky transcription factors (TFs): molecular switches to regulate drought, temperature, and salinity stresses in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1039329. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1039329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang D, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Feng X, Lin H. Diverse roles of MYB transcription factors in plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2025;67(3):539–62. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zheng C, Yang Q, Wang X, Chen Y, He R, Li X, Pan H, Zhuo R, Qu T, Qiu W. Transcription factors involved in plant stress and growth and development: NAC. Agronomy. 2025;15(4):949. doi: 10.3390/agronomy15040949. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guo Z, Dzinyela R, Yang L, Hwarari D. bzip transcription factors: structure, modification, abiotic stress responses and application in plant improvement. Plants. 2024;13(15):2058. doi: 10.3390/plants13152058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ritonga FN, Ngatia JN, Wang Y, Khoso MA, Farooq U, Chen S. Ap2/erf, an important cold stress-related transcription factor family in plants: a review. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2021;27(9):1953–68. doi: 10.1007/s12298-021-01061-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liang X, Luo G, Li W, Yao A, Liu W, Xie L, Han M, Li X, Han D. Overexpression of a Malus baccata CBF transcription factor gene, MbCBF1, increases cold and salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol bioch. 2022;192:230–42. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qian Y, Zhang T, Yu Y, Gou L, Yang J, Xu J, Pi E. Regulatory mechanisms of bHLH transcription factors in plant adaptive responses to various abiotic stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:677611. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.677611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thakur S, Vasudev PG. Myb transcription factors and their role in medicinal plants. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(11):10995–1008. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07825-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sabir IA, Manzoor MA, Shah IH, Liu X, Zahid MS, Jiu S, Wang J, Abdullah M, Zhang C. Myb transcription factor family in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.): genome-wide investigation, evolution, structure, characterization and expression patterns. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):1–20. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03374-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rakesh J, Nayidu NK, Pattar S, Gandhadmath SS, Sukanth B, Nayak S, Patil BR. Comparative and expression analysis of MYB transcription factor genes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Crop Improv. 2023;37(4):479–505. doi: 10.1080/15427528.2022.2112346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sumbur B, Gao F, Liu Q, Feng D, Bing J, Dorjee T, Li X, Sun H, Zhou Y. The characterization of R2R3-MYB genes in Ammopiptanthus nanus uncovers that the miR858-AnaMYB87 module mediates the accumulation of anthocyanin under osmotic stress. Biomolecules. 2023;13(12):1721. doi: 10.3390/biom13121721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ma Z, Zhong Y. Functions of MYB transcription factors response and tolerance to abiotic stresses in plants. 2025.
- 33.Pratyusha DS, Sarada DV. Myb transcription factors—master regulators of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and diverse developmental and stress responses. Plant Cell Rep. 2022;41(12):2245–60. doi: 10.1007/s00299-022-02927-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Klempnauer K-H. Transcription factor MYB as therapeutic target: current developments. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(6):3231. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lemma RB, Fuglerud BM, Frampton J, Gabrielsen OS. Myb: a key transcription factor in the hematopoietic system subject to many levels of control. Transcription Factors Blood Cell Devel. 2024:3–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu M, Yang H, Fan S, Guo B, Dai L, Wang L, Wang M. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the R2R3-MYB gene family in rubber trees. Forests. 2023;14(4):710. doi: 10.3390/f14040710. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu Q, Xu Y, Li X, Qi T, Li B, Wang H, Zhu Y. Genome-wide identification and characterization of MYB transcription factors in Sudan grass under drought stress. Plants. 2024;13(18):2645. doi: 10.3390/plants13182645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kang L, Teng Y, Cen Q, Fang Y, Tian Q, Zhang X, Wang H, Zhang X, Xue D. Genome-wide identification of R2R3-MYB transcription factor and expression analysis under abiotic stress in rice. Plants. 2022;11(15):1928. doi: 10.3390/plants11151928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ma R, Huang W, Hu Q, Tian G, An J, Fang T, Liu J, Hou J, Zhao M, Sun L. Tandemly duplicated MYB genes are functionally diverged in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in soybean. Plant Physiol. 2024;194(4):2549–63. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiae019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Albert NW, Allan AC. Myb genes involved in domestication and crop improvement. Ann Plant Rev Online. 2021;4:199–242. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li P, Wen J, Chen P, Guo P, Ke Y, Wang M, Liu M, Tran LSP, Li J, Du H. Myb superfamily in Brassica napus: evidence for hormone-mediated expression profiles, large expansion, and functions in root hair development. Biomolecules. 2020;10(6):875. doi: 10.3390/biom10060875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang W, Fang H, Aslam M, Du H, Chen J, Luo H, Chen W, Liu X. Myb gene family in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum revealing their potential functions in the adaption to nitrogen deficiency and diurnal cycle. J Phycol. 2022;58(1):121–32. doi: 10.1111/jpy.13217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dai Y, Liu S, Zuo D, Wang Q, Lv L, Zhang Y, Cheng H, Yu JZ, Song G. Identification of MYB gene family and functional analysis of GhMYB4 in cotton (Gossypium spp.). Mol Genet Genomics. 2023;298(3):755–66. doi: 10.1007/s00438-023-02005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chen Z, Lu X, Li Q, Li T, Zhu L, Ma Q, Wang J, Lan W, Ren J. Systematic analysis of MYB gene family in Acer rubrum and functional characterization of ArMYB89 in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis. J Exp Botany. 2021;72(18):6319–35. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sun W, Ma Z, Chen H, Liu M. Myb gene family in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.): genome-wide identification of hormone-responsive reveals their potential functions in growth and development. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(19):4847. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li J, Guo S, Min Htwe Y, Sun X, Zhou L, Wang F, Zeng C, Chen S, Iqbal A, Yang Y. Genome-wide identification, classification and expression analysis of MYB gene family in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). Front Plant Sci. 2024;14:1263595. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1263595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhou L, Yarra R, Yang Y, Liu Y, Yang M, Cao H. The oil palm R2R3-MYB subfamily genes EgMYB111 and EgMYB157 improve multiple abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2022;41(2):377–93. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02814-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Si Z, Wang L, Ji Z, Zhao M, Zhang K, Qiao Y. Comparative analysis of the MYB gene family in seven Ipomoea species. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1155018. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1155018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xu M, Fu J, Ni Y, Zhang C. Genome-wide analysis of the MYB gene family in pumpkin. PeerJ. 2024;12:e17304. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wei Q, Liu Y, Lan K, Wei X, Hu T, Chen R, Zhao S, Yin X, Xie T. Identification and analysis of MYB gene family for discovering potential regulators responding to abiotic stresses in Curcuma wenyujin. Front Genet. 2022;13:894928. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.894928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lu M, Chen Z, Dang Y, Li J, Wang J, Zheng H, Li S, Wang X, Du X, Sui N. Identification of the MYB gene family in Sorghum bicolor and functional analysis of SbMYBAS1 in response to salt stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2023;113(4–5):249–64. doi: 10.1007/s11103-023-01386-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wu W, Zhu S, Zhu L, Wang D, Liu Y, Liu S, Zhang J, Hao Z, Lu Y, Cheng T, et al. Characterization of the Liriodendron chinense MYB gene family and its role in abiotic stress response. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:641280. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.641280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang X, Xu Z, Liu B, Xiao Y, Chai L, Zhong L, Huo H, Liu L, Yang H, Liu H. Identification of MYB gene family in medicinal tea tree Melaleuca alternifolia (Maiden and Betche) Cheel and analysis of members regulating terpene biosynthesis. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51(1):70. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-09019-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Arce-Rodríguez ML, Martínez O, Ochoa-Alejo N. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the MYB transcription factor gene family in chili pepper (Capsicum spp.). Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5):2229. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen X, Mao Y, Chai W, Yan K, Liang Z, Xia P. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of MYB gene family under nitrogen stress in Panax notoginseng. Protoplasma. 2023;260(1):189–205. doi: 10.1007/s00709-022-01770-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lv J, Xu Y, Dan X, Yang Y, Mao C, Ma X, Zhu J, Sun M, Jin Y, Huang L. Genomic survey of MYB gene family in six pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) varieties and their response to abiotic stresses. Genetica. 2023;151(3):251–65. doi: 10.1007/s10709-023-00188-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang B, Wen X, Fu B, Wei Y, Song X, Li S, Wang L, Wu Y, Hong Y, Dai S. Genome-wide analysis of MYB gene family in Chrysanthemum× morifolium provides insights into flower color regulation. Plants. 2024;13(9):1221. doi: 10.3390/plants13091221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Muhammad N, Luo Z, Zhao X, Yang M, Liu Z, Liu M. Transcriptome-wide expression analysis of MYB gene family leads to functional characterization of flavonoid biosynthesis in fruit coloration of Ziziphus mill. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1171288. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1171288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cao Y, Jia H, Xing M, Jin R, Grierson D, Gao Z, Sun C, Chen K, Xu C, Li X. Genome-wide analysis of MYB gene family in Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra) and identification of members regulating flavonoid biosynthesis. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:691384. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.691384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhang L, Xu Y, Li Y, Zheng S, Zhao Z, Chen M, Yang H, Yi H, Wu J. Transcription factor CsMYB77 negatively regulates fruit ripening and fruit size in citrus. Plant Physiol. 2024;194(2):867–83. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Matsumura T, Totani H, Gunji Y, Fukuda M, Yokomori R, Deng J, Rethnam M, Yang C, Tan TK, Karasawa T, et al. A MYB enhancer-guided analysis of basophil and mast cell differentiation. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):7064. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34906-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Battat M, Eitan A, Rogachev I, Hanhineva K, Fernie A, Tohge T, Beekwilder J, Aharoni A. A MYB triad controls primary and phenylpropanoid metabolites for pollen coat patterning. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(1):87–108. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Anwar M, Chen L, Xiao Y, Wu J, Zeng L, Li H, Wu Q, Hu Z. Recent advanced metabolic and genetic engineering of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9544. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ma D, Constabel CP. Myb repressors as regulators of phenylpropanoid metabolism in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24(3):275–89. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bulanov AN, Andreeva EA, Tsvetkova NV, Zykin PA. Regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis by the MYB-bHLH-WDR (MBW) complex in plants and its specific features in cereals. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(2):734. doi: 10.3390/ijms26020734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liu C, Wang X, Dang J, Li D, Pan M, Yang F. Screening and preliminary validation of Myb transcription factors that promote the synthesis of (-)-pulegone in Schizonepeta tenuifolia Briq. Available at SSRN 5207051.
- 67.Shen W. An investigation of transcription factor regulatory mechanism in plants. The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong); GB/T 7714-2015, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang X, Niu Y, Zheng Y. Multiple functions of MYB transcription factors in abiotic stress responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):6125. doi: 10.3390/ijms22116125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cheng Y-J, Wang J-W, Ye R. Histone dynamics responding to internal and external cues underlying plant development. Plant Physiol. 2024;194(4):1980–97. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liu Z, Zhao M, Zhang H, Ren T, Liu C, He N. Divergent response and adaptation of specific leaf area to environmental change at different spatio-temporal scales jointly improve plant survival. Global Change Biol. 2023;29(4):1144–59. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chen Z, Yu L, Liu W, Zhang J, Wang N, Chen X. Research progress of fruit color development in Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Plant Physiol bioch. 2021;162:267–79. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Li C, Yu W, Xu J, Lu X, Liu Y. Anthocyanin biosynthesis induced by MYB transcription factors in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11701. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lanctot AP. Now we’re cooking with auxin: using synthetic and genomic tools to probe the root recipe. University of Washington; 2021. doi: 10.1201/9781003346401-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lemma RB, Ledsaak M, Fuglerud BM, Rodríguez-Castañeda F, Eskeland R, Gabrielsen OS. Myb regulates the sumo protease SENP1 and its novel interaction partner UXT, modulating Myb target genes and the sumo landscape. J Biol Chem. 2023;299(9):105062. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wang Z, Peng Z, Khan S, Qayyum A, Rehman A, Du X. Unveiling the power of MYB transcription factors: master regulators of multi-stress responses and development in cotton. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2024;276:133885. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Balhara R, Verma D, Kaur R, Singh K. Myb transcription factors, their regulation and interactions with non-coding RNAs during drought stress in Brassica juncea. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05736-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Basu S, Kumar G. Understanding the role of key transcription factors in regulating salinity tolerance in plants. Global Clim Change Plant Stress Manag. 2023:299–316. doi: 10.1002/9781119858553.ch21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yin X, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wang B, Zhao Y, Irfan M, Chen L, Feng Y. Regulation of MYB transcription factors of anthocyanin synthesis in lily flowers. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:761668. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.761668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Rodrigues JA, Espley RV, Allan AC. Genomic analysis uncovers functional variation in the C-terminus of anthocyanin-activating MYB transcription factors. Hortic Res. 2021;8(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00514-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ma R, Liu B, Geng X, Ding X, Yan N, Sun X, Wang W, Sun X, Zheng C. Biological function and stress response mechanism of MYB transcription factor family genes. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(1):83–95. doi: 10.1007/s00344-021-10557-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.He J, Liu Y, Yuan D, Duan M, Liu Y, Shen Z, Yang C, Qiu Z, Liu D, Wen P, et al. An R2R3 MYB transcription factor confers brown planthopper resistance by regulating the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase pathway in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(1):271–77. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902771116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lu H-C, Lam S-H, Zhang D, Hsiao Y-Y, Li B-J, Niu S-C, Li C-Y, Lan S, Tsai W-C, Liu Z-J. R2R3-MYB genes coordinate conical cell development and cuticular wax biosynthesis in Phalaenopsis aphrodite. Plant Physiol. 2022;188(1):318–31. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Yang Y, Zhang L, Chen P, Liang T, Li X, Liu H. Uv-B photoreceptor UVR8 interacts with MYB73/MYB77 to regulate auxin responses and lateral root development. EMBO J. 2020;39(2):e101928. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019101928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zheng T, Tan W, Yang H, Zhang L, Li T, Liu B, Zhang D, Lin H. Regulation of anthocyanin accumulation via MYB75/HAT1/TPL-mediated transcriptional repression. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(3):e1007993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wang Y-M, Wang C, Guo H-Y, Wang Y-C. BplMYB46 from Betula platyphylla can form homodimers and heterodimers and is involved in salt and osmotic stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(5):1171. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Parwez R, Aftab T, Gill SS, Naeem M. Abscisic acid signaling and crosstalk with phytohormones in regulation of environmental stress responses. Environ Exp botany. 2022;199:104885. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104885. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Singh A, Roychoudhury A. Abscisic acid in plants under abiotic stress: crosstalk with major phytohormones. Plant Cell Rep. 2023;42(6):961–74. doi: 10.1007/s00299-023-03013-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ortega-Villaizán A G, King E, Patel MK, Pollmann S. Plant hormone crosstalk under abiotic stress conditions. In: Progress in botany. Vol. 85. New York: Springer; 2024. p. 167–94. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0491-4_11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Shi M, Liu X, Zhang H, He Z, Yang H, Chen J, Feng J, Yang W, Jiang Y, Yao J-L, et al. The IAA- and ABA-responsive transcription factor CgMYB58 upregulates lignin biosynthesis and triggers juice sac granulation in pummelo. Hortic Res. 2020;7(1). doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00360-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wei X, Lu W, Mao L, Han X, Wei X, Zhao X, Xia M, Xu C. Abf2 and MYB transcription factors regulate feruloyl transferase FHT involved in ABA-mediated wound suberization of kiwifruit. J Exp Botany. 2020;71(1):305–17. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhang S, Zhao Q, Zeng D, Xu J, Zhou H, Wang F, Ma N, Li Y. RhMYB108, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, is involved in ethylene- and JA-induced petal senescence in rose plants. Hortic Res. 2019;6(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0221-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Jalmi SK, Bhagat PK, Verma D, Noryang S, Tayyeba S, Singh K, Sharma D, Sinha AK. Traversing the links between heavy metal stress and plant signaling. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Baoxiang W, Zhiguang S, Yan L, Bo X, Jingfang L, Ming C, Yungao X, Bo Y, Jian L, Jinbo L, et al. A pervasive phosphorylation cascade modulation of plant transcription factors in response to abiotic stress. Planta. 2023;258(4):73. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04232-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Chen Z, Teng S, Liu D, Chang Y, Zhang L, Cui X, Wu J, Ai P, Sun X, Lu T, et al. Rlm1, encoding an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, regulates the development of secondary cell wall in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:905111. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.905111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gong Z. Plant abiotic stress: new insights into the factors that activate and modulate plant responses. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63(3):429. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Amin N, Lu L, Rehman F, Imran M, Yuhong G, Wang P, Jian W. Transcriptional regulation of GmNAC3-mediated drought stress tolerance in soybean. GM Crops Food. 2025;16(1):435–49. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2025.2516295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Beathard C, Mooney S, Al-Saharin R, Goyer A, Hellmann H. Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana R2R3 S23 MYB transcription factors as novel targets of the ubiquitin proteasome-pathway and regulators of salt stress and abscisic acid response. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:629208. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.629208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Li Y, Tian B, Wang Y, Wang J, Zhang H, Wang L, Sun G, Yu Y, Zhang H. The transcription factor MYB37 positively regulates photosynthetic inhibition and oxidative damage in Arabidopsis leaves under salt stress. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:943153. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.943153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Li X, Lu J, Zhu X, Dong Y, Liu Y, Chu S, Xiong E, Zheng X, Jiao Y. AtMYBS1 negatively regulates heat tolerance by directly repressing the expression of MAX1 required for strigolactone biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Commun. 2023;4(6):4. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Ortiz-García P, Pérez-Alonso M-M, González Ortega-Villaizán A, Sánchez-Parra B, Ludwig-Müller J, Wilkinson MD, Pollmann S. The indole-3-acetamide-induced Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB74 decreases plant growth and contributes to the control of osmotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:928386. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.928386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wang F, Kong W, Wong G, Fu L, Peng R, Li Z, Yao Q. AtMYB12 regulates flavonoids accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Genet Genomics. 2016;291(4):1545–59. doi: 10.1007/s00438-016-1203-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Cheng Y, Ma Y, Zhang N, Lin R, Yuan Y, Tian H, Hussain S, Chen S, Yang W, Cai L, et al. The R2R3 MYB transcription factor MYB71 regulates abscisic acid response in Arabidopsis. Plants. 2022;11(10):1369. doi: 10.3390/plants11101369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Lee SB, Kim HU, Suh MC. Myb94 and Myb96 additively activate cuticular wax biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57(11):2300–11. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Chen N, Pan L, Yang Z, Su M, Xu J, Jiang X, Yin X, Wang T, Wan F, Chi X. A MYB-related transcription factor from peanut, AhMYB30, improves freezing and salt stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis through both DREB/CBF and ABA-signaling pathways. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1136626. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1136626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Chen X, Wu Y, Yu Z, Gao Z, Ding Q, Shah SHA, Lin W, Li Y, Hou X. BcMYB111 responds to BcCBF2 and induces flavonol biosynthesis to enhance tolerance under cold stress in non-heading Chinese cabbage. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):8670. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Yang L, Chen Y, Xu L, Wang J, Qi H, Guo J, Zhang L, Shen J, Wang H, Zhang F, et al. The OsFTIP6-OsHB22-OsMYBR57 module regulates drought response in rice. Mol Plant. 2022;15(7):1227–42. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tiwari P, Indoliya Y, Chauhan AS, Pande V, Chakrabarty D. Over-expression of rice R1-type MYB transcription factor confers different abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2020;206:111361. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Qu X, Zou J, Wang J, Yang K, Wang X, Le J. A rice R2R3-type MYB transcription factor OsFLP positively regulates drought stress response via OsNAC. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11):5873. doi: 10.3390/ijms23115873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Liu T, Chen T, Kan J, Yao Y, Guo D, Yang Y, Ling X, Wang J, Zhang B. The GhMYB36 transcription factor confers resistance to biotic and abiotic stress by enhancing PR1 gene expression in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(4):722–35. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Liu R, Shen Y, Wang M, Liu R, Cui Z, Li P, Wu Q, Shen Q, Chen J, Zhang S, et al. GhMYB102 promotes drought resistance by regulating drought-responsive genes and ABA biosynthesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Sci. 2023;329:111608. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Han G, Qiao Z, Li Y, Yang Z, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Guo J, Liu L, Wang C, Wang B. LbMYB48 positively regulates salt gland development of Limonium bicolor and salt tolerance of plants. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1039984. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1039984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Leng B, Wang X, Yuan F, Zhang H, Lu C, Chen M, Wang B. Heterologous expression of the Limonium bicolor MYB transcription factor LbTRY in Arabidopsis thaliana increases salt sensitivity by modifying root hair development and osmotic homeostasis. Plant Sci. 2021;302:110704. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Wang Y, Ye H, Wang K, Huang C, Si X, Wang J, Xu Y, Huang Y, Huang J, Li Y. CcMYB12 positively regulates flavonoid accumulation during fruit development in Carya cathayensis and has a role in abiotic stress responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24):15618. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Qin B, Fan S-L, Yu H-Y, Lu Y-X, Wang L-F. HbMYB44, a rubber tree MYB transcription factor with versatile functions in modulating multiple phytohormone signaling and abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:893896. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.893896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Wang C, Wang L, Lei J, Chai S, Jin X, Zou Y, Sun X, Mei Y, Cheng X, Yang X, et al. IbMYB308, a sweet potato R2R3-MYB gene, improves salt stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Genes. 2022;13(8):1476. doi: 10.3390/genes13081476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Wang Z, Li X, Gao X-R, Dai Z-R, Peng K, Jia L-C, Wu Y-K, Liu Q-C, Zhai H, Gao S-P, et al. Ibmyb73 targets abscisic acid-responsive IbGER5 to regulate root growth and stress tolerance in sweet potato. Plant Physiol. 2024;194(2):787–804. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Zhou Z, Wei X, Lan H. CgMYB1, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, can alleviate abiotic stress in an annual halophyte Chenopodium glaucum. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2023;196:484–96. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ning C, Yang Y, Chen Q, Zhao W, Zhou X, He L, Li L, Zong D, Chen J. An R2R3 MYB transcription factor PsFLP regulates the symmetric division of guard mother cells during stomatal development in Pisum sativum. Physiologia Plantarum. 2023;175(3):e13943. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Zhou L, Huan X, Zhao K, Jin X, Hu J, Du S, Han Y, Wang S. PagMYB205 negatively affects poplar salt tolerance through reactive oxygen species scavenging and root vitality modulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(20):15437. doi: 10.3390/ijms242015437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hu J, Zou S, Huang J, Huan X, Jin X, Zhou L, Zhao K, Han Y, Wang S. PagMYB151 facilitates proline accumulation to enhance salt tolerance of poplar. BMC Genomics. 2023;24(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09459-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ren C, Li Z, Song P, Wang Y, Liu W, Zhang L, Li X, Li W, Han D. Overexpression of a grape MYB transcription factor gene VhMYB2 increases salinity and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13):10743. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Lim J, Lim CW, Lee SC. Role of pepper MYB transcription factor CaDIM1 in regulation of the drought response. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1028392. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1028392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Chen Q, Peng L, Wang A, Yu L, Liu Y, Zhang X, Wang R, Li X, Yang Y, Li X, et al. An R2R3-MYB FtMYB11 from tartary buckwheat has contrasting effects on abiotic tolerance in Arabidopsis. J Plant Physiol. 2023;280:153842. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Sun M, Xu Q-Y, Zhu Z-P, Liu P-Z, Yu J-X, Guo Y-X, Tang S, Yu Z-F, Xiong A-S. AgMYB5, an MYB transcription factor from celery, enhanced β-carotene synthesis and promoted drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04157-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Yu Y, Guo D-D, Min D-H, Cao T, Ning L, Jiang Q-Y, Sun X-J, Zhang H, Tang W-S, Gao S-Q, et al. Foxtail millet MYB-like transcription factor SiMYB16 confers salt tolerance in transgenic rice by regulating phenylpropane pathway. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2023;195:310–21. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Fang L, Wang Z, Su L, Gong L, Xin H. Vitis MYB14 confer cold and drought tolerance by activating lipid transfer protein genes expression and reactive oxygen species scavenge. Gene. 2024;890:147792. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Wang J, Chen C, Wu C, Meng Q, Zhuang K, Ma N. Slmyb41 positively regulates tomato thermotolerance by activating the expression of Slhsp90. 3. Plant Physiol bioch. 2023;204:108106. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Clara L, David C, Laila S, Virginie R, Marie-Joelle V. Comparative proteomic analysis of transcriptional and regulatory proteins abundances in S. lividans and S. coelicolor suggests a link between various stresses and antibiotic production. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(23):14792. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Chen Y, Li A, Yun P, Chen Q, Pan D, Guo R, Zhang H, Ahmed HAI, Hu H, Peng Y, et al. Genome-wide analysis of MYB transcription factor family and AsMYB1R subfamily contribution to ROS homeostasis regulation in Avena sativa under PEG-induced drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05251-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Demo AH, Gemeda MK, Abdo DR, Guluma TN, Adugna DB. Impact of soil salinity, sodicity, and irrigation water salinity on crop production and coping mechanism in areas of dryland farming. Agrosyst Geosci Env. 2025;8(1):e70072. doi: 10.1002/agg2.70072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Zhou H, Shi H, Yang Y, Feng X, Chen X, Xiao F, Lin H, Guo Y. Insights into plant salt stress signaling and tolerance. J Genet Genomics. 2024;51(1):16–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2023.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Islam M, Islam M, Hasan M, Hafeez A, Chowdhury M, Pramanik M, Iqbal MA, Erman M, Barutcular C, Konuşkan Ö, et al. Salinity stress in maize: consequences, tolerance mechanisms, and management strategies. OBM Genet. 2024;8(02):1–41. doi: 10.21926/obm.genet.2402232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Wang S, Jiang R, Feng J, Zou H, Han X, Xie X, Zheng G, Fang C, Zhao J. Overexpression of transcription factor FaMYB63 enhances salt tolerance by directly binding to the SOS1 promoter in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2024;114(2):32. doi: 10.1007/s11103-024-01431-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Zhao H, Yao P, Zhao J, Wu H, Wang S, Chen Y, Hu M, Wang T, Li C, Wu Q. A novel R2R3-MYB transcription factor FtMYB22 negatively regulates salt and drought stress through ABA-dependent pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(23):14549. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Wang S, Wu H, Cao X, Fan W, Li C, Zhao H, Wu Q. Tartary buckwheat FtMYB30 transcription factor improves the salt/drought tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis in an ABA‐dependent manner. Physiologia Plantarum. 2022;174(5):e13781. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Chen C, Zhang Z, Lei YY, Chen WJ, Zhang ZH, Li XM, Dai H-Y. MdMYB44-like positively regulates salt and drought tolerance via the MdPYL8-MdPP2CA module in Apple. The Plant J. 2024;118(1):24–41. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Liu Y, Guo P, Gao Z, Long T, Xing C, Li J, Xue J, Chen G, Xie Q, Hu Z. Silencing of SlMYB78-like reduces the tolerance to drought and salt stress via the ABA pathway in tomato. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(21):11449. doi: 10.3390/ijms252111449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Aizaz M, Lubna L, Jan R, Asaf S, Bilal S, Kim K-M, Al-Harrasi A. Regulatory dynamics of plant hormones and transcription factors under salt stress. Biology. 2024;13(9):673. doi: 10.3390/biology13090673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Chen K, Song M, Guo Y, Liu L, Xue H, Dai H, Zhang Z. Md MYB 46 could enhance salt and osmotic stress tolerance in Apple by directly activating stress‐responsive signals. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(12):2341–55. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Zhang P, Wang R, Yang X, Ju Q, Li W, Lü S, Tran LSP, Xu J. The R2R3-MYB transcription factor AtMYB49 modulates salt tolerance in Arabidopsis by modulating the cuticle formation and antioxidant defence. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2020;43(8):1925–43. doi: 10.1111/pce.13784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Shukla V, Han J-P, Cléard F, Lefebvre-Legendre L, Gully K, Flis P, Berhin A, Andersen TG, Salt DE, Nawrath C, et al. Suberin plasticity to developmental and exogenous cues is regulated by a set of MYB transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(39):e2101730118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101730118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Kim D, Jeon SJ, Yanders S, Park SC, Kim HS, Kim S. Myb3 plays an important role in lignin and anthocyanin biosynthesis under salt stress condition in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2022;41(7):1549–60. doi: 10.1007/s00299-022-02878-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Zhang M, Ma C, Qiao S, Li H, Zhao W, Liu B. Compensatory growth and ion balance adaptation mechanisms of Salix matsudana Koidz under heterogeneous salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06252-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Nizam A, Rawoof A, Adot V, Madhavan C, Ramchiary N, Kumar A. Comparative root transcriptome analysis of Kandelia candel Druce and Rhizophora mucronata Lam. germinating propagules under salinity gradients reveal their tolerance mechanisms and ecological adaptations. Plant Growth Regul. 2024;103(3):539–63. doi: 10.1007/s10725-024-01125-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Ahmadzai AS, Hu C, Zhang C, Li Y. Mechanisms of anthocyanin-mediated salt stress alleviation and cellular homeostasis in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2025;105(3):655–73. doi: 10.1007/s10725-025-01298-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wu G-Q, Wang J-L, Li S-J. Genome-wide identification of Na+/H+ antiporter (NHX) genes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and their regulated expression under salt stress. Genes. 2019;10(5):401. doi: 10.3390/genes10050401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Agarwal P, Dave A, Agarwal P. Transcriptional regulation of salinity stress: role and spatio-temporal expressions of ion-transporter gene promoters. Biol Plant. 2018;62(4):641–46. doi: 10.1007/s10535-018-0815-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Zhang X, Chen L, Shi Q, Ren Z. Slmyb102, an R2R3-type MYB gene, confers salt tolerance in transgenic tomato. Plant Sci. 2020;291:110356. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Sun Y, Zhao J, Li X, Li Y. E2 conjugases UBC1 and UBC2 regulate MYB42‐mediated SOS pathway in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis. The New phytol. 2020;227(2):455–72. doi: 10.1111/nph.16538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Yang B, Wen H, Wang S, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang T, Yuan K, Lu L, Liu Y, Xue Q, et al. Enhancing drought resistance and yield of wheat through inoculation with Streptomyces pactum Act12 in drought field environments. Agronomy. 2024;14(4):692. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14040692. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Hareem M, Danish S, Obaid SA, Ansari MJ, Datta R. Mitigation of drought stress in chili plants (Capsicum annuum L.) using mango fruit waste biochar, fulvic acid and cobalt. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):14270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65082-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Yu B, Chao DY, Zhao Y. How plants sense and respond to osmotic stress. JIPB. 2024;66(3):394–423. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Alghamdi S. Drought and salinity effects on plant growth: a comprehensive review. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2024;56(6):2231–340. doi: 10.54910/sabrao2024.56.6.14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Yan M, Li X, Ji X, Gang B, Li Y, Li Z, Wang Y, Guo H. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor PdbMYB6 enhances drought tolerance by mediating reactive oxygen species scavenging, osmotic balance, and stomatal opening. Plant Physiol bioch. 2025;220:109536. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Sima P, Mohammad RM, Sajid A, Christophe H, Muhittin K. Secondary metabolites and their potential roles in plant tolerance against abiotic and biotic stress. Plant Stress. 2023;10(100292). doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Rasul KS, Na-R T. Response of different tomato accessions to biotic and abiotic stresses. arXiv preprint arXiv:240317030 2024.
- 157.Mehmood I, Wani KI, Aftab T. Cadmium tolerance in plants: antioxidants, phytochelatins, metallothioneins, nutrient management and immune response. In: Plant responses to cadmium toxicity: insights into physiology and defense mechanisms. Vol. 2024. Cham: Springer; p. 259–85. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-73266-9_10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Zhu Z, Quan R, Chen G, Yu G, Li X, Han Z, Xu W, Li G, Shi J, Li B. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor VyMYB24, isolated from wild grape Vitis yanshanesis JX Chen, regulates the plant development and confers the tolerance to drought. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:966641. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.966641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Wu J, Jiang Y, Liang Y, Chen L, Chen W, Cheng B. Expression of the maize MYB transcription factor ZmMYB3R enhances drought and salt stress tolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol bioch. 2019;137:179–88. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Li H, Yang J, Ma R, An X, Pan F, Zhang S, Fu Y. Genome‐wide identification and expression analysis of MYB gene family in Cajanus cajan and CcMYB107 improves plant drought tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum. 2023;175(4):e13954. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Dong NQ, Lin HX. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant–environment interactions. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63(1):180–209. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Ren Y, Zhang S, Zhao Q, Wu Y, Li H. The CsMYB123 and CsbHLH111 are involved in drought stress-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in Chaenomeles speciosa. Mol Horticulture. 2023;3(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s43897-023-00071-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Chen Y, Feng P, Zhang X, Xie Q, Chen G, Zhou S, Hu Z. Silencing of SlMYB50 affects tolerance to drought and salt stress in tomato. Plant Physiol bioch. 2022;193:139–52. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Chen Y, Li L, Tang B, Wu T, Chen G, Xie Q, Hu Z. Silencing of SlMYB55 affects plant flowering and enhances tolerance to drought and salt stress in tomato. Plant Sci. 2022;316:111166. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.111166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Zhu N, Duan B, Zheng H, Mu R, Zhao Y, Ke L, Sun Y. An R2R3 MYB gene GhMYB3 functions in drought stress by negatively regulating stomata movement and ROS accumulation. Plant Physiol bioch. 2023;197:107648. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Yin F, Lv Y, Cao B, Zhang S, Xu K. Physiological and transcriptomic investigation of low pH-mediated salt stress alleviation in ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Scientia Hortic. 2024;331:113101. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Zhao H, Zhao H, Hu Y, Zhang S, He S, Zhang H, Zhao N, Liu Q, Gao S, Zhai H. Expression of the sweet potato MYB transcription factor IbMYB48 confers salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes. 2022;13(10):1883. doi: 10.3390/genes13101883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Liu Y, Shen Y, Liang M, Zhang X, Xu J, Shen Y, Chen Z. Identification of peanut AhMYB44 transcription factors and their multiple roles in drought stress responses. Plants. 2022;11(24):3522. doi: 10.3390/plants11243522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado AI. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science. 2020;368(6488):266–69. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz7614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Gao J, Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Liu W, Jiang C, Li J, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wang X, et al. Rrs1 shapes robust root system to enhance drought resistance in rice. The New phytol. 2023;238(3):1146–62. doi: 10.1111/nph.18775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Song Q, Kong L, Yang X, Jiao B, Hu J, Zhang Z, Xu C, Luo K. Ptomyb142, a poplar R2R3-MYB transcription factor, contributes to drought tolerance by regulating wax biosynthesis. Tree Physiol. 2022;42:2133–47. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpac060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Hsu PK, Dubeaux G, Takahashi Y, Schroeder JI. Signaling mechanisms in abscisic acid‐mediated stomatal closure. Plant J. 2021;105(2):307–21. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Dossa K, Mmadi MA, Zhou R, Liu A, Yang Y, Diouf D, You J, Zhang X. Ectopic expression of the sesame MYB transcription factor SiMYB305 promotes root growth and modulates ABA-mediated tolerance to drought and salt stresses in Arabidopsis. aob Plants. 2020;12(1):lz081. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plz081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Duan B, Xie X, Jiang Y, Zhu N, Zheng H, Liu Y, Hua X, Zhao Y, Sun Y. GhMYB44 enhances stomatal closure to confer drought stress tolerance in cotton and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol bioch. 2023;198:107692. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Chen L, Yang H, Fang Y, Guo W, Chen H, Zhang X, Dai W, Chen S, Hao Q, Yuan S, et al. Overexpression of GmMYB14 improves high‐density yield and drought tolerance of soybean through regulating plant architecture mediated by the brassinosteroid pathway. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19(4):702–16. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Ding Y, Shi Y, Yang S. Molecular regulation of plant responses to environmental temperatures. Mol Plant. 2020;13(4):544–64. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Lee Z, Lim JA, Harikrishna JA, Islam T, Abd Rahim MH, Yaacob JS. Regulation of plant responses to temperature stress: a key factor in food security and for mitigating effects of climate change. Int J Plant Prod. 2024;18(2):141–59. doi: 10.1007/s42106-024-00282-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Yu M, Luobu Z, Zhuoga D, Wei X, Tang Y. Advances in plant response to low-temperature stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2025;105(1):167–85. doi: 10.1007/s10725-024-01253-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Zhou L, Ullah F, Zou J, Zeng X. Molecular and physiological responses of plants that enhance cold tolerance. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(3):1157. doi: 10.3390/ijms26031157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Abdullah SNA, Azzeme AM, Yousefi K. Fine-tuning cold stress response through regulated cellular abundance and mechanistic actions of transcription factors. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:850216. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.850216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Yao C, Li X, Li Y, Yang G, Liu W, Shao B, Zhong J, Huang P, Han D. Overexpression of a Malus baccata MYB transcription factor gene MbMYB4 increases cold and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1794. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Yao C, Li W, Liang X, Ren C, Liu W, Yang G, Zhao M, Yang T, Li X, Han D. Molecular cloning and characterization of MbMYB108, a Malus baccata MYB transcription factor gene, with functions in tolerance to cold and drought stress in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):4846. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Liu W, Wang T, Wang Y, Liang X, Han J, Han D. MbMYBC1, a M. baccata MYB transcription factor, contribute to cold and drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1141446. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1141446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Bachir IH, Ployet R, San Clemente H, Aguilar M, Dupas A, Ladouce N. Cold stress involves CBF dependent regulatory pathway to remodel wood formation in Eucalyptus gunnii hybrids. bioRxiv 2024:2024.12. 11.627904.
- 185.Luo D, Raza A, Cheng Y, Zou X, Lv Y. Cloning and functional characterization of cold-inducible MYB-like 17 transcription factor in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(11):9514. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Yamagishi M. Mechanisms by which high temperatures suppress anthocyanin coloration in flowers and fruits, and discovery of floricultural crops that exhibit high-temperature-tolerant flower pigmentation. Hort J. 2024;93(3):203–15. doi: 10.2503/hortj.QH-142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Dar NA, Mir MA, Mir JI, Mansoor S, Showkat W, Parihar TJ, Haq SAU, Wani SH, Zaffar G, Masoodi KZ. Myb-6 and ldox-1 regulated accretion of anthocyanin response to cold stress in purple black carrot (Daucus carota L.). Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(6):5353–64. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-07077-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Rao MJ, Duan M, Zhou C, Jiao J, Cheng P, Yang L, Wei W, Shen Q, Ji P, Yang Y, et al. Antioxidant defense system in plants: Reactive oxygen species production, signaling, and scavenging during abiotic stress-induced oxidative damage. Horticulturae. 2025;11(5):477. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae11050477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Wang P, Liu WC, Han C, Wang S, Bai MY, Song CP. Reactive oxygen species: multidimensional regulators of plant adaptation to abiotic stress and development. J Integr Plant Biol. 2024;66(3):330–67. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Wang R, Li Z, Liu X, Singh B, Chauhan RS, Duan Y, Xue J, Kumar V, Xue T. A novel transcription factor PtMYB77 from Pinellia ternata enhances heat tolerance in Arabidopsis by inducing early expression of heat shock factor genes. Ind Crops Products. 2025;227:120791. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Sharma N, Sharma L, Onkarappa D, Yogendra K, Bose J, Sharma RA. Molecular basis and engineering strategies for transcription factor-mediated reproductive-stage heat tolerance in crop plants. Agronomy. 2024;14(1):159. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14010159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Zhang T, Cui Z, Li Y, Kang Y, Song X, Wang J, Zhou Y. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of MYB transcription factor superfamily in Dendrobium catenatum. Front Genet. 2021;12:714696. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.714696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Jacob P, Brisou G, Dalmais M, Thévenin J, van Der Wal F, Latrasse D, Suresh Devani R, Benhamed M, Dubreucq B, Boualem A, et al. The seed development factors TT2 and MYB5 regulate heat stress response in Arabidopsis. Genes. 2021;12(5):746. doi: 10.3390/genes12050746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Bisht N, Singh T, Ansari M, Joshi H, Mishra SK, Chauhan PS. Plant growth-promoting Bacillus amyloliquefaciens orchestrate homeostasis under nutrient deficiency exacerbated drought and salinity stress in Oryza sativa L. seedlings. Planta. 2025;261(1):1–19. doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04585-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Nadeem F, Abbas S, Waseem F, Ali N, Mahmood R, Bibi S, Deng L, Wang R, Zhong Y, Li X. Phosphorus (P) and zinc (Zn) nutrition constraints: a perspective of linking soil application with plant regulations. Environ Exp botany. 2024;226:105875. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Yang Y, Wang L, Zhang D, Che Z, Wang Q, Cui R, Zhao W, Huang F, Zhang H, Cheng H, et al. Soybean type-B response regulator GmRR1 mediates phosphorus uptake and yield by modifying root architecture. Plant Physiol. 2024;194(3):1527–44. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Yang WT, Bae KD, Lee S-W, Jung KH, Moon S, Basnet P, Choi I-Y, Um T, Kim DH. The MYB-CC transcription factor PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE-LIKE 7 (PHL7) functions in phosphate homeostasis and affects salt stress tolerance in rice. Plants. 2024;13(5):637. doi: 10.3390/plants13050637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Tang X, Zhang Y, Meng P, Yuan Y, Li C, Zhi X, Wang C. The impact of nitrogen and phosphorus interaction on growth, nutrient absorption, and signal regulation in woody plants. Biology. 2025;14(5):490. doi: 10.3390/biology14050490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Wang H, Pak S, Yang J, Wu Y, Li W, Feng H, Yang J, Wei H, Li C. Two high hierarchical regulators, PuMYB40 and PuWRKY75, control the low phosphorus driven adventitious root formation in Populus ussuriensis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(8):1561–77. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Sega P, Pacak A. Plant PHR transcription factors: put on a map. Genes. 2019;10(12):1018. doi: 10.3390/genes10121018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Li Y, Ma W, Zhang K, Wang X, Liu R, Tian Y, Ma N, Zhao Q, Xu R, Zhong Y, et al. Overexpression of GmPHR1 promotes soybean yield through global regulation of nutrient acquisition and root development. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(23):15274. doi: 10.3390/ijms232315274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Rerkasem B, Jamjod S, Pusadee T. Productivity limiting impacts of boron deficiency, a review. Plant SOil. 2020;455(1–2):23–40. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04676-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Chalchisa G, Muzahid ANM, Mollah MDA, Gasura E, Xie X, Liu X, Lv H, Tian H, Zhong C, Li D. Kiwifruit sensitivity to boron: impact on physiological and molecular responses. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1549854. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1549854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Liu J, Chen T, Wang C-L, Liu X. Transcriptome analysis in Pyrus betulaefolia roots in response to short-term boron deficiency. Genes. 2023;14(4):817. doi: 10.3390/genes14040817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Yuan Z, Cai S, Yan C, Rao S, Cheng S, Xu F, Liu X. Research progress on the physiological mechanism by which selenium alleviates heavy metal stress in plants: a review. Agronomy. 2024;14(8):1787. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14081787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Jorjani S, Karakaş FP. Physiological and biochemical responses to heavy metals stress in plants. Int J Multiling Secondary Metabolite. 2024;11(1):169–90. doi: 10.21448/ijsm.1323494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Ray S, Vashishth R. From water to plate: reviewing the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in fish and unraveling human health risks in the food chain. Emerging contam. 2024;10(4):100358. doi: 10.1016/j.emcon.2024.100358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Zhang H, Lu L. Transcription factors involved in plant responses to cadmium-induced oxidative stress. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1397289. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1397289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Niekerk LA, Gokul A, Basson G, Badiwe M, Nkomo M, Klein A, Keyster M. Heavy metal stress and mitogen activated kinase transcription factors in plants: exploring heavy metal‐ROS influences on plant signalling pathways. Plant, Cell Environ. 2024;47(8):2793–810. doi: 10.1111/pce.14926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Gao LJ, Liu XP, Gao KK, Cui MQ, Zhu HH, Li GX, Yan JY, Wu YR, Ding ZJ, Chen XW, et al. Art1 and putrescine contribute to rice aluminum resistance via OsMYB30 in cell wall modification. J Integr Plant Biol. 2023;65(4):934–49. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Wu Q, Tao Y, Huang J, Liu YS, Yang XZ, Jing HK, Shen RF, Zhu XF. The MYB transcription factor MYB103 acts upstream of TRICHOME BIREFRINGENCE‐LIKE27 in regulating aluminum sensitivity by modulating the O‐acetylation level of cell wall xyloglucan in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2022;111(2):529–45. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Wang H, Yin X, Du D, Liang Z, Han Z, Nian H, Ma Q. GsMYB7 encoding a R2R3-type MYB transcription factor enhances the tolerance to aluminum stress in soybean (Glycine max L.). BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08744-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Feng S, Hou K, Zhang H, Chen C, Huang J, Wu Q, Zhang Z, Gao Y, Wu X, Wang H, et al. Investigation of the role of TmMYB16/123 and their targets (TmMTP1/11) in the tolerance of Taxus media to cadmium. Tree Physiol. 2023;43(6):1009–22. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpad019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Sapara KK, Khedia J, Agarwal P, Gangapur DR, Agarwal PK. SbMYB15 transcription factor mitigates cadmium and nickel stress in transgenic tobacco by limiting uptake and modulating antioxidative defence system. Funct Plant Biol. 2019;46(8):702–14. doi: 10.1071/FP18234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Su L, Lv A, Wen W, Fan N, Li J, Gao L, Zhou P, An Y. Msmyb741 is involved in alfalfa resistance to aluminum stress by regulating flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant J. 2022;112(3):756–71. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Biswas D, Gain H, Mandal A. Myb transcription factor: a new weapon for biotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Stress. 2023;10:100252. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Munzert KS, Engelsdorf T, Höfte M. Plant cell wall structure and dynamics in plant–pathogen interactions and pathogen defence. J Exp Botany. 2025;76(2):228–42. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Degli Esposti C, Guerrisi L, Peruzzi G, Giulietti S, Pontiggia D. Cell wall bricks of defence: the case study of oligogalacturonides. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1552926. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1552926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Roychowdhury R, Hada A, Biswas S, Mishra S, Prusty MR, Das SP, Ray S, Kumar A, Sarker U. Jasmonic acid (JA) in plant immune response: unravelling complex molecular mechanisms and networking of defence signalling against pathogens. J Plant Growth Regul. 2025;44(1):89–114. doi: 10.1007/s00344-024-11264-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Jalal A, Wang Y, Cai C, Ayaz A, Alabbosh KF, Khan KA, Han S, Zhu D. The architecture of adaptive lignin biosynthesis navigating environmental stresses in plants. J Agronomy Crop Sci. 2025;211(1):e70012. doi: 10.1111/jac.70012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Yu Y, Zhang S, Yu Y, Cui N, Yu G, Zhao H, Meng X, Fan H. The pivotal role of MYB transcription factors in plant disease resistance. Planta. 2023;258(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04180-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Kim SH, Lam PY, Lee M-H, Jeon HS, Tobimatsu Y, Park OK. The Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB transcription factor MYB15 is a key regulator of lignin biosynthesis in effector-triggered immunity. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:583153. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.583153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.An C, Sheng L, Du X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Song A, Jiang J, Guan Z, Fang W, Chen F, et al. Overexpression of CmMYB15 provides chrysanthemum resistance to aphids by regulating the biosynthesis of lignin. Hortic Res. 2019;6(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0166-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Wang Y, Sheng L, Zhang H, Du X, An C, Xia X, Chen F, Jiang J, Chen S. CmMYB19 over-expression improves aphid tolerance in chrysanthemum by promoting lignin synthesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(3):619. doi: 10.3390/ijms18030619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Zhu Y, Hu X, Wang P, Wang H, Ge X, Li F, Hou Y. GhODO1, an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor, positively regulates cotton resistance to Verticillium dahliae via the lignin biosynthesis and jasmonic acid signaling pathway. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2022;201:580–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Castorina G, Bigelow M, Hattery T, Zilio M, Sangiorgio S, Caporali E, Venturini G, Iriti M, Yandeau-Nelson MD, Consonni G. Roles of the MYB94/fused leaves1 (ZmFDL1) and GLOSSY2 (ZmGL2) genes in cuticle biosynthesis and potential impacts on Fusarium verticillioides growth on maize silks. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1228394. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1228394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Medina-Puche L. Editorial: advances in molecular plant pathology, plant abiotic and biotic stress. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1398469. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1398469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Chen Z, Xu M, Quan C, Lin S, Li J, Wei F, Tang D. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the WRKY gene family reveal essential roles in abiotic stress responses and polysaccharides and flavonoids biosynthesis in Platostoma palustre (Blume) A. J. Paton. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05835-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Xiao S, Hu Q, Shen J, Liu S, Yang Z, Chen K, Klosterman SJ, Javornik B, Zhang X, Zhu L. GhMYB4 downregulates lignin biosynthesis and enhances cotton resistance to Verticillium dahliae. Plant Cell Rep. 2021;40(4):735–51. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02672-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Liu F, Xi M, Liu T, Wu X, Ju L, Wang D. The central role of transcription factors in bridging biotic and abiotic stress responses for plants’ resilience. New Crops. 2024;1:100005. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrops.2023.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Samanta S, Roychoudhury A. Molecular crosstalk of jasmonate with major phytohormones and plant growth regulators during diverse stress responses. J Plant Growth Regul. 2025;44(1):62–88. doi: 10.1007/s00344-024-11412-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Zheng H, Dong L, Han X, Jin H, Yin C, Han Y, Li B, Qin H, Zhang J, Shen Q, et al. The TuMYB46L-TuACO3 module regulates ethylene biosynthesis in einkorn wheat defense to powdery mildew. New Phytol. 2020;225(6):2526–41. doi: 10.1111/nph.16305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Zhang M, Wang J, Luo Q, Yang C, Yang H, Cheng Y. CsMYB96 enhances citrus fruit resistance against fungal pathogen by activating salicylic acid biosynthesis and facilitating defense metabolite accumulation. J Plant Physiol. 2021;264:153472. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Gu K-D, Zhang Q-Y, Yu J-Q, Wang J-H, Zhang F-J, Wang C-K, Zhao Y-W, Sun C-H, You C-X, Hu D-G, et al. R2R3-MYB transcription factor MdMYB73 confers increased resistance to the fungal pathogen Botryosphaeria dothidea in apples via the salicylic acid pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(1):447–58. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c06740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Salam U, Ullah S, Tang Z-H, Elateeq AA, Khan Y, Khan J, Khan A, Ali S. Plant metabolomics: an overview of the role of primary and secondary metabolites against different environmental stress factors. Life. 2023;13(3):706. doi: 10.3390/life13030706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Kumar A, Kumar S, Korra T, Thakur R, Arutselvan R, Kashyap AS, Nehela Y, Chaplygin V, Minkina T, Keswani C. Role of plant secondary metabolites in defence and transcriptional regulation in response to biotic stress. Plant Stress. 2023;8:100154. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Ahlawat YK, Singh M, Manorama K, Lakra N, Zaid A, Zulfiqar F. Plant phenolics: neglected secondary metabolites in plant stress tolerance. Braz J Bot. 2023;47(3):703–21. doi: 10.1007/s40415-023-00949-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Gao Q, Zheng R, Lu J, Li X, Wang D, Cai X, Ren X, Kong Q. Trends in the potential of stilbenes to improve plant stress tolerance: insights of plant defense mechanisms in response to biotic and abiotic stressors. J Agric Food Chem. 2024;72(14):7655–71. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Upadhyay R, Saini R, Shukla P, Tiwari K. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense mechanisms: a molecular and biotechnological insights. Phytochem Rev. 2025;24(1):953–83. doi: 10.1007/s11101-024-09976-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Pang Z, Chen J, Wang T, Gao C, Li Z, Guo L, Xu J, Cheng Y. Linking plant secondary metabolites and plant microbiomes: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:621276. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.621276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Kaur S, Samota MK, Choudhary M, Choudhary M, Pandey AK, Sharma A, Thakur J. How do plants defend themselves against pathogens-biochemical mechanisms and genetic interventions. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2022;28(2):485–504. doi: 10.1007/s12298-022-01146-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Sun M, Xiao X, Khan KS, Lyu J, Yu J. Characterization and functions of myeloblastosis (MYB) transcription factors in cucurbit crops. Plant Sci. 2024;348:112235. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Li P, Xia E, Fu J, Xu Y, Zhao X, Tong W, Tang Q, Tadege M, Fernie AR, Zhao J. Diverse roles of MYB transcription factors in regulating secondary metabolite biosynthesis, shoot development, and stress responses in tea plants (Camellia sinensis). The Plant J. 2022;110(4):1144–65. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Premathilake AT, Ni J, Bai S, Tao R, Ahmad M, Teng Y. R2r3-myb transcription factor PpMYB17 positively regulates flavonoid biosynthesis in pear fruit. Planta. 2020;252(4):1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03473-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Mariyam S, Kumar V, Roychoudhury A, Ghodake GS, Muneer S, Duhan JS, Ahmad F, Sharma RK, Singh J, Seth CS. Functional diversification and mechanistic insights of MYB transcription factors in mediating plant growth and development, secondary metabolism, and stress responses. J Plant Growth Regul. 2025;44(4):1465–84. doi: 10.1007/s00344-025-11622-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Song Y, Ma B, Guo Q, Zhou L, Zhou X, Ming Z, You H, Zhang C. Myb pathways that regulate UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1125382. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1125382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Rao X, Chen X, Shen H, Ma Q, Li G, Tang Y, Pena M, York W, Frazier TP, Lenaghan S, et al. Gene regulatory networks for lignin biosynthesis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(3):580–93. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Cao Y, Li K, Li Y, Zhao X, Wang L. Myb transcription factors as regulators of secondary metabolism in plants. Biology. 2020;9(3):61. doi: 10.3390/biology9030061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Deng Y, Lu S. Biosynthesis and regulation of phenylpropanoids in plants. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2017;36(4):257–90. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2017.1402852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Wu Y, Wen J, Xia Y, Zhang L, Du H. Evolution and functional diversification of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in plants. Horticul Res. 2022;9:uhac058. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Guo H, Wang L, Yang C, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Wang C. Identification of novel cis‐elements bound by BplMYB46 involved in abiotic stress responses and secondary wall deposition. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018;60(10):1000–14. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Xiao R, Zhang C, Guo X, Li H, Lu H. Myb transcription factors and its regulation in secondary cell wall formation and lignin biosynthesis during xylem development. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):3560. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Hussain SS, Rasheed B, Rao AQ, Shahid AA, Shi B. Towards engineering smart transcription factors for enhanced abiotic stress tolerance in plants. In: Biology and biotechnology of environmental stress tolerance in plants. Apple Academic Press; 2023. p. 187–237. doi: 10.1201/9781003346401-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Zhang C, Jiao C, Sun X, Li X. A MYB transcription factor atlas provides insights into the evolution of environmental adaptations in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):2566. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Wu X, Xia M, Su P, Zhang Y, Tu L, Zhao H, Gao W, Huang L, Hu Y. Myb transcription factors in plants: a comprehensive review of their discovery, structure, classification, functional diversity and regulatory mechanism. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2024;282:136652. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Sethi S. Crispr/cas-mediated multiplex gene editing in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Gene editing in plants: CRISPR-Cas and its applications 2024. 795–815. [Google Scholar]
- 257.Pradhan S, Shyamli PS, Suranjika S, Parida A. Genome wide identification and analysis of the R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene family in the mangrove Avicennia marina. Agronomy. 2021;11(1):123. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11010123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Wei H, Bausewein A, Greiner S, Dauchot N, Harms K, Rausch T. Ci MYB 17, a stress‐induced chicory R2R3‐MYB transcription factor, activates promoters of genes involved in fructan synthesis and degradation. New phytol. 2017;215(1):281–98. doi: 10.1111/nph.14563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Chang YN, Zhu C, Jiang J, Zhang H, Zhu JK, Duan CG. Epigenetic regulation in plant abiotic stress responses. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020;62(5):563–80. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Cai H, Tian S, Dong H, Guo C. Pleiotropic effects of TaMYB3R1 on plant development and response to osmotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Gene. 2015;558(2):227–34. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.12.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Roy S. Function of MYB domain transcription factors in abiotic stress and epigenetic control of stress response in plant genome. Plant Signal Behav. 2016;11(1):e1117723. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1117723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Wang Y, Zhang Y, Fan C, Wei Y, Meng J, Li Z, Zhong C. Genome-wide analysis of MYB transcription factors and their responses to salt stress in Casuarina equisetifolia. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03083-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Mmadi MA, Dossa K, Wang L, Zhou R, Wang Y, Cisse N, Sy M, Zhang X. Functional characterization of the versatile MYB gene family uncovered their important roles in plant development and responses to drought and waterlogging in sesame. Genes. 2017;8(12):362. doi: 10.3390/genes8120362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Li J, Han G, Sun C, Sui N. Research advances of MYB transcription factors in plant stress resistance and breeding. Plant Signaling Behav. 2019;14(8):1613131. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2019.1613131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
