Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Sep 18;20(9):e0332596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332596

Fetal malnutrition and associated factors among term newborn babies in Jimma Zone public hospitals, South West Ethiopia

Aynadis Awoke 1,*, Aynalem Yetwale 2, Tsegaw Biyazin 1, Tegegn Wolde 3, Makeda Sinaga 1
Editor: Tebelay Dilnessa4
PMCID: PMC12445542  PMID: 40966208

Abstract

Background

Fetal malnutrition is a major public health burden affecting developing nations, potentially leading to cerebral and neurologic disabilities in later life. Despite its prevalence, little is known about its associated factors in the study area. Thus, this study aimed to assess prevalence and associated factors of fetal malnutrition among term newborn babies in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals.

Method

A cross-sectional study was carried out among 449-term newborns using systematic sampling techniques in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals from April 1, 2024, to July 30, 2024. Maternal data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and newborn data were collected using clinical assessment of fetal nutrition (CAN score) scoring system and entered into Epi-data version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Bivariate logistic regression was performed and variables with a p-value ≤0.25 were entered into multivariable logistic regression analysis. P-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant and data were presented using text, figures, and tables.

Result

A total of 449 newborns with their mothers were involved in the study with the response rate of 100%. The prevalence of fetal malnutrition was 91/449 (20.3%) (95% CI, 16.5–24). Among delivered newborns 229/449 (51%) were females and the remaining are males. Maternal age less than nineteen was 60/449 (13.4%) (AOR = 2.930, 95% CI (2.518–13.967)), maternal MUAC ≤23 were 181/449 (40.3%) (AOR = 4.094, 95% CI (2.155–7.77)), infection during pregnancy 97/449 (21.6%) (AOR = 2.729, 95% CI (1.286–5.792)), malaria 99/449 (22%) (AOR = 2.125, 95% CI (1.002–4.510)), not taking Iron and Folic Acid 300/449 (66.8%) (AOR = 2.897, 95% CI (1.330–6.309)), complication during current pregnancy 116/449 (25.8%) (AOR = 4.629, 95% CI (2.444–8.767)), anemia 301/449 (67%) (AOR = 3.669, 95% CI (1.968–6.840)), low birth weight 77/449 (17.1%) (AOR = 5.363, 95% CI (2.760–10.420)), low placental weight 204/449 (45.4%) (AOR = 4.984, 95% CI (2.530–9.816)), antenatal depression 153/449 (34%) (AOR = 7.184, 95% CI (3.733–13.827)), and intimate partner violence 153/449 (34%) (AOR = 5.613, 95% CI (3.011–10.328)), were significantly associated with fetal malnutrition.

Conclusion

The prevalence of fetal malnutrition in this study indicates one in five delivered newborn. Newborns with low birth weight, low placental weight, and mothers having anemia, intimate partner violence (IPV), antenatal depression, teenage pregnancy, malaria, infection, and complications during pregnancy were a strong association with fetal malnutrition. Therefore, this study recommends that all concerned bodies, should prioritize efforts to reduce intimate partner violence, prevent infections during pregnancy, enhance maternal nutrition counseling, and address the issue of teenage pregnancy.

Introduction

Fetal malnutrition is a significant public health problem, affecting one in ten newborns in developed countries and a staggering one in three to one in four in developing countries [1]. It significantly harms newborns, hindering their growth and development, increasing their vulnerability to infections, and raising their risk of chronic diseases later in life. It also contributes to fetal distress in the womb and perinatal complications, including stillbirth, congenital anomalies, neonatal hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), and potentially permanent physical and mental retardation [2].

Fetal malnutrition is a serious concern across India (18.5–21.2%), Nigeria (18.8%), and Ethiopia (21.7%) [36]. In Ethiopia, despite efforts like neonatal nurse training and improved healthcare access that have made significant progress towards reducing under-five mortality, newborn deaths remain high (nearly half of under-five deaths) with many preventable causes, and the rate of neonatal mortality still accounts for 41%. This highlights the need for further action to address this critical issue [7].

Studies have shown the devastating impact of malnutrition on various organ systems. It influences endogenous melatonin synthesis, and this effect would be transmitted to the next generation, placing an infant at risk for poor mental performance at a later age. With a concerning 39% of fatally malnourished children exhibiting cerebral and neurological disabilities, infants with fetal malnutrition have significantly higher mortality and morbidity in the first month of life [8,9]. Early identification is significant because intrauterine starvation can lead to later developmental problems [10]. It can cause defects in the formation of the neural system and also affect brain development. Infants who experience malnutrition in the womb may develop chronic diseases later in life, such as cardiovascular issues, diabetes, and even breast cancer. The fetus’s initial adaptations to survive on limited nutrients can have unintended consequences, triggering health problems in adulthood [9,1113].

In Ethiopia, as well as in sub-Saharan African countries, there is little research conducted about the prevalence of fetal malnutrition and its associated factors, even though there is a high population projection and risk for malnutrition. It is also imperative to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal of newborn health, which aims to reduce neonatal mortality to at least as low as 12 per 1000 live birth [14]. Therefore, this study aimed to address determinants of fetal malnutrition among term newborns delivered in Jimma zone public hospitals.

Materials and methods

Study setting and design

The study was conducted in Jimma zone public hospitals, Oromia region, southwest Ethiopia. Jimma zone is one of the twenty administrative zones in the Oromia regional state, which is approximately about 357 kilometers far from Addis Ababa (the capital city of Ethiopia). Jimma zone has three general hospitals, five district hospitals, one referral and teaching Hospital (JUMC), 2 private hospitals, and 120 health centers. It provides service for a total population of 3,486,155 and JUMC serves as a referral hospital for all southwest Ethiopia including south Sudan. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 1, 2024, to July 30, 2024.

Study participants

All newborns with their mothers delivered in Jimma zone public hospitals within 24–48 hours of birth. Selected newborns with their mothers within 24–48 hours of birth delivered in Jimma zone public hospitals were study population.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All newborns with the gestational age of 37–42 weeks and who are singleton live births in Jimma zone public hospitals were included in the study.

This study excluded newborns with obvious congenital abnormalities, incomplete placentas, a requirement for NICU admission; Mothers with known gestational diabetes mellitus, Women who were critically ill and unable to respond to interviews were excluded.

Sample size determination

The sample size was determined by using a single population proportion formula, considering 21.7% (1) of the prevalence of fetal malnutrition and associated factors among term newborn babies study conducted in Northwestern Ethiopia, with a 4% margin of error at a 95% confidence level.

𝐧=(Zα/2)2 (P)(1P)d2
=(1.96)2(0.217)(10.217)(0.04)2

no=407.78 =408

nf = 408 + 10%non-respondents.=448.8= 449

Finally, the data was collected from a total sample of 449 newborns with their mothers.

Sampling technique and procedure

From the nine hospitals found in the Jimma zone, simple random sampling techniques (lottery method) were employed to select 30% from those hospitals, and proportional allocation of the sample was employed based on the monthly delivery report for each selected hospital. Then systematic sampling techniques were employed among mothers who delivered in the selected hospitals based on medical record numbers within 24 to 48 hours. Taking the past year’s four-month delivery report of the selected hospital (1650) source population divided by sample size K = 3.67 = 4) the first mother was selected randomly and then every fourth mother was taken (Fig 1.tif).

Fig 1. Schematic presentation of the sampling procedure for fetal malnutrition and associated factors among term newborn babies in Jimma zone public hospital, southweat Ethiopoa.

Fig 1

Data collection technique and instruments

The data were collected using pre-tested semi-structured interviewer administered questionnaires for maternal data and standardized tools (CAN score) for newborn data [17]. The questionnaire consists of seven sections: Socio-demographic characteristics contain nine questions, maternal nutritional and behavioral factors contain seven questions, obstetric factors contain thirteen variables, medical factors contain seven questions, neonatal characteristics have four variables, intimate partner violence (IPV) has thirteen questions, antenatal depression assessment tool contains ten items, and (CAN) score it is a standardized tool, contains nine parameters scored based on loss of subcutaneous fat and muscle mass used to assess the nutritional status of the newborn.

Data collection procedures

The data were collected by six BSc midwives, two for each hospital to do in a turnover period under the supervision of three midwives with MSc degrees. The data was collected by using, face-to-face interview and reviewing medical records, and also physical observation of the newborns nutritional status using CAN score. Following delivery, the placenta was immediately cleared of blood clots. A section approximately 5 cm from the neonatal side was excised and weighed, including membranes and umbilical cord, on an infant weighing scale to the nearest tenth of a gram. The nutritional status of the newborns was assessed using the clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score within 24–48 hours of birth and the rating is based on different characteristics (hair and buccal fat in the cheeks, chin, neck, arms, back inter or subscapular skin, buttocks, legs, chest, and abdominal wall skin). For each point of assessment, the degree of loss of subcutaneous fat was scored by applying a maximum score of four for no evidence of malnutrition and the lowest score of one for the worst evidence of malnutrition. The highest attainable score was thirty-six and the lowest was nine and then the cumulative score is taken to classify whether the fetus is malnourished or well-nourished.

Dependent variable

Fetal malnutrition.

Independent Variables

Socio-demographic characteristics of the mother (Age, educational status, marital status, Residence, total family size, wealth status, altitude)

Maternal nutritional and behavioral factors: -One additional meal during pregnancy, dietary counseling, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, chat chawing (sniffing local tobacco), food taboos (restricted food during pregnancy), mid-upper arm circumference of the mother (MUAC)

Obstetric factors: -Teenage pregnancy (first conception age), birth interval, parity, wanted and planned pregnancy, previous pregnancy complication, complication in the current pregnancy, antenatal care (ANC) visits, number of ANC contact, Iron and folic acid provision, number of IFA taken, type of complication during pregnancy.

Medical factors: -Anemia, infection (UTI or STI), malaria, ITN use, concurrent medical illness, drug use,

Psychosocial factors: - Intimate partner violence (IPV) (physical violence, psychological violence, and sexual violence), and antenatal depression.

Fetal factors: – Weight of the newborn, sex, and weight of the placenta, gestational age

Operational definitions

Clinical Assessment of Nutritional Status (CAN) Score: -This is a scoring system based on nine superficial readily detectable signs of malnutrition in newborn babies [8].

Malnourished: -Indicates undernutrition of the fetus which is the clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) cumulative score ≤25(1).

Well-nourished:- Indicates which is the clinical assessment nutritional status (CAN) score cumulative score >25.

Intimate partner violence: – was assessed as exposure to physical violence (6 items) such as slapping, hitting, kicking, and beating; sexual violence (3 items) including forced sexual intercourse and other forms of sexual coercion; and psychological (emotional) violence (4items) such as insults, belittling and intimidation, threatened to hurt. Women were asked to indicate whether they had experienced any of the violent acts during the current pregnancy and classified as having violent if she had experienced one of these question [9].

Low placental weight: – weight of placenta less than 512 gm is considered as low placental weight (1).

Antenatal Depression:-Mothers was assessed based on 10 questions or (Edinburgh maternal depression assessment criteria). Those who score greater than 13 are likely to be suffering antenatal depression [10].

Data quality assurance

Questionnaires were prepared in English first by the principal investigator and translated into the local language (Afan Oromo) and Amharic by another individual who is native to the Afan Oromo language and Amharic respectively. The questionnaire was translated back to English by another individual blinded to the original version of the questionnaire to ensure its consistency. Pre-testing of the data collection tool was done before the actual data collection, in 5% (23) of the total sample size at Agaro General Hospital. Based on the results of pre-testing necessary adjustments to the data collection tools were made, such as language fluency. The training was given to all data collectors and supervisors on the overall procedure of data collection by the principal investigator. During data collection, the supervisors closely follow the day-to-day data collection process and ensure the completeness and consistency of the questionnaire administered each day. After the data was collected, the data was reviewed and checked for completeness before data entry. Besides this, the principal investigator carefully enters and thoroughly cleans the data before the commencement of the analysis.

Data analysis

The data were cleaned, coded, and entered into Epi data version 4.6. After checking and correcting errors, the data was exported to SPSS version 26 for further analysis. The assumption of binary regression was checked using the chi-square test (cross tabs). The model of fitness was checked by Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness of fit test and the result (p-value = 0.897), indicates the model is a good fit. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for each independent variable with the outcome variable and those variables with a p-value <0.25 were candidates to consider in a multivariable logistic regression. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for the effect of confounders of fetal malnutrition. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant and the findings were narrated using text, tables, and figures.

Ethical approval and informed consent

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration 142 of Helsinki and approved by Jimma University’s institutional review board (IRB) with a reference number JUIH/IRB/454/23. Permission letter was provided to, Jimma Zone Health Bureau, and permission from each selected hospital before data collection was taken. Written informed consent and assent for those less than 18 years were obtained from participants after informing, them regarding the purpose, procedures, and benefits of the study and participants were informed that they had the right to refuse or discontinue participating in the research without any compromise in the service they were getting from the respective facilities. They also assured strict confidentiality about any information obtained from them and the information collected was not described concerning individual names.

Result

The planned sample size was 449, and all of the planned study subjects were involved with a response rate of 100%. In this study, mothers in the age group of ≤19 years or younger were 60/449 (13.4%). Mothers who can read and write were 131/449 (29.2%), regarding occupational status, 188/449 (41.9%) of mothers were employed as housewives, nearly all 397/449 (88.4%) were married and 222/449 (49.4%) followed Muslim religion. More than half 254/449 (56.6%) have families with 4–6 members a little over half 255/449 (56.8%) live in urban areas and also over two-thirds 306/449 (68.2%) live far from a health facility. Regarding their economic status, 87/449 (19.4%) of the respondents were categorized under the poorest household status Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the mothers delivered in Jimma zone public hospitals, southwest Ethiopia, 2024 (N = 449).

Characteristics Category Frequency Percent (%)
Maternal age ≤19 60 13.4
20-24 129 28.7
25-29 159 35.4
30-34 60 13.4
35-39 33 7.3
≥40 8 1.8
Educational status Unable to read and write 112 24.9
Able to read and write 131 29.2
Primary 35 7.8
Secondary 60 13.4
College and above 111 24.7
Occupation status Housewife 188 41.9
Merchant 47 10.5
Private worker 87 19.4
Government worker 107 23.8
Othersa 20 4.5
Marital status Single 27 6
Married 397 88.4
Divorced 25 5.6
Religion Orthodox 141 31.4
Muslim 222 49.4
Protestant 83 18.5
Catholic 3 0.7
Family size 1-3 180 40.1
4-6 254 56.6
≥7 15 3.3
Residence Urban 255 56.8
Rural 194 43.2
Wealth status Poorest 87 19.4
Poor 97 21.6
Medium 86 19.2
Rich 89 19.8
Richest 90 20
Altitude <2000 213 47.4
≥2000 236 52.6

aOthers: Include daily labor, maid, and jobless.

Prevalence of fetal malnutrition

In this study, the prevalence of fetal malnutrition was 91/449 (20.3%) which indicates that at least one in five delivered babies identified as malnourished and 358/449 (79.7%) was well-nourished (Fig 2.tif).

Fig 2. Prevalence of fetal malnutrition among term newborn babies in Jimma Zone Public Hospital 2024(N=449).

Fig 2

Maternal nutritional and behavioral factors

In this study, 252/449 (56.1%) of mothers reported consuming additional meals during pregnancy, and dietary counseling was received by 282/449 (62.8%) of mothers. During their current pregnancy, mothers 118/449 (26.3%) used alcohol like beer or katikala, while 378/449 (84.2%) did not use cigarettes or local tobacco. Among the mothers, 181/449 (40.3%) were malnourished, defined as having a MUAC of less than 23 cm, and 110/449 (24.5%) reported food taboos within their culture Table 2.

Table 2. Maternal nutritional and behavioral factors in Jimma zone public hospitals, southwest Ethiopia, 2024(N = 449).

Characteristics Category Frequency Percent (%)
Do you consume extra additional meals? Yes 252 56.1
No 197 43.9
Do you get dietary counseling? Yes 282 62.8
No 167 37.2
Have you ever used alcohol, beer, or katikala? Yes 118 26.3
No 331 73.7
Have you ever used cigarettes or local tobacco? Yes 71 15.8
No 378 84.2
Have you ever used Chat chawing? Yes 124 27.6
No 325 72.4
Is there any food item restricted or food taboo in your culture? Yes 110 24.5
No 339 75.5
Maternal MUAC in centimeters >23 268 59.7
≤23 181 40.3

Maternal obstetrics and medical related factors

In this study, mothers with teenage ≤19 years old at their first birth were 185/449 (41.2%) and Primipara comprised 160/449 (35.6%) of the respondents, while grand multiparas accounted for 26/449 (5.8%). Nearly 169/449 (38%) of the mothers had a short birth interval, regarding pregnancy intention, a vast majority 400/449 (89.1%) reported their pregnancies as wanted, and planned pregnancies represented 365/449 (81.7%). Among mothers, 97/449 (21.6%) had an infection during the current pregnancy, and mothers complicated with malaria account for 350/449 (78%). Mothers with comorbid medical illness were 108/449 (24.1%) of those having a comorbid medical illness, 35/108 (32.4%) have chronic hypertension and 11/108 (10.2%) of mothers were HIV positive (ART users). Mothers who had used drugs such as analgesics during current pregnancy account for 134/449 (29.8%) of the respondents and 301/449 (67%) of the mothers develop anemia during pregnancy Table 3.

Table 3. Maternal Obstetrics and medical factors in Jimma Zone public hospital, southwest Ethiopia, 2024(N = 449).

Variables Category Frequency Percent (%)
First pregnancy age ≤19 185 41.2
20-34 257 57.2
≥35 7 1.6
Parity Primipara 160 35.6
Multipara 263 58.6
Grand multipara 26 5.8
Birth interval Optimal birth interval 280 62.4
Short birth interval 169 37.6
Is pregnancy wanted Yes 400 89.1
No 49 10.9
Is pregnancy planned Yes 367 81.7
No 82 18.3
Complications in previous pregnancy Yes 79 17.6
No 370 82.4
Type of complication APH 20 25.3
PIH 11 13.9
PPH 11 13.9
Abortion 17 21.5
PROM 15 19.1
Othersb 5 6.3
Complications in this pregnancy Yes 116 25.8
No 333 74.2
Type of complication in this pregnancy APH 25 21.6
PROM 40 34.5
Malaria 20 17.2
PIH, preeclampsia 26 22.4
Othersc 5 4.3
ANC follow up Yes 323 71.9
No 126 28.1
Number of ANC contact Regular ANC follow-up 223 67.4
Irregular ANC follow-up 108 32.6
IFA supplementation Yes 300 66.8
No 149 33.2
Number of IFA supplementation A good intake of IFA 221 73.2
Poor intake of IFA 81 26.8
Infection during pregnancy Yes 97 21.6
No 352 78.4
Malaria during pregnancy Yes 99 22.0
No 350 78.0
ITN utilization Yes 315 70.2
No 134 29.8
Have you had a comorbid medical illness? Yes 108 24.1
No 341 75.9
Type of medical illness? TB 24 22.2
HIV 11 10.2
Chronic HTN 35 32.4
Asthma 32 29.6
Othersd 6 5.6
Have you used drugs such as analgesics during pregnancy Yes 134 29.8
No 315 70.2
Maternal Hgb ≤10.9 301 67.0
>11 148 33.0

bOthers include, Infection, Preterm labor, Stillbirth, Anemia c Infection (UTI, STI),Hyperemesis gravidraum, Depression/Anxiety, d Others: include vascular disease, renal diseases.

Maternal psychosocial factors

From a history of intimate partner violence, 104/449 (23.2%) experience physical violence, 108/449 (24.1%) experience emotional violence, 131/449 (29.2%) experience sexual violence, and 153/449 (34%) of the mothers experience at least one type of violence. Regarding antenatal depression assessment, 153/449 (34%) of the mothers were categorized as depressed (Fig 3.tif).

Fig 3. Intimate partner violence status and antenatal antenatal depression among mothers delivered in Jimma zone public hospital 2024(N=449).

Fig 3

Neonatal characteristics

Among the delivered newborns, 229/449 (51%) were female and 372/449 (82.9%) had normal birth weight. More than half 245/449 (54.6%), of the measured placentas weighed as normal weight, while 204/449 (45.4%) were low placental weight Table 4.

Table 4. Neonatal characteristics delivered in Jimma Zone Public Hospital, southwest Ethiopia, 2024 (N = 449).

Variables Category Frequency Percent
Sex of newborn Male 220 49.0
Female 229 51.0
Weight of newborn Normal birth weight 372 82.9
Low birth weight 77 17.1
Placental weight Normal placental weight 245 54.6
Low placental weight 204 45.4

Associated factors with fetal malnutrition

In this study, a total of thirty five variables were significant factors in bivariate logistic regression at a p-value less than or equal to 0.25 and transfer to multivariable logistic regression.

In multivariable logistic regression, variables such as maternal characteristics like maternal age, place of residence, not gating dietary counseling, adherence to food taboos, MUAC less than 23, presence of infections during pregnancy, malaria, drug use, anemia, newborns with low birth weight, low placental weight, complications during this pregnancy, not taking Iron and Folic Acid (IFA), and psychosocial factors like depression and intimate partner violence, were a significant associations with fetal malnutrition Table 5.

Table 5. Binary and multivariable logistic regression model, among term newborn babies in Jimma zone public hospital Ethiopia, 2024(N = 449).

Characteristics Category Malnourished Well-nourished COR (95%CI) AOR (95% CI) P-value
Age of mother ≤19 31 29 6.025(3.218-11.28) 2.930(2.518-13.967) 0.001
20-24 8 33 1.366(0.580-3.218) 0.924(0.315-2.712) 0.886
25-34 33 186 1
≥35 19 110 0.974(0.528-1.795) 0.1859(0.826-4.167) 0.135
Residence Urban 29 226 1
Rural 62 132 3.660(2.241-5.978) 1.545(1.545-5.511) 0.018
Dietary counseling Yes 23 259 1
No 68 99 7.735(4.569-13.094) 4.844(2.388-9.828) 0.001
Food taboo Yes 53 57 7.365(4.45112.188 2.095(1.033-4.250) 0.040
No 38 301 1
Maternal MUAC ≤23 64 111 5.271(3.191-8.718) 4.094(2.155-7.77) 0.001
>23 27 247 1
Infection Yes 51 46 8.648(5.157-14.501) 2.729(1.286-5.792) 0.009
No 40 312 1
Malaria Yes 55 44 10.903(6.447-18.439) 2.125(1.002-4.510) 0.049
No 36 314 1
Drug use Yes 62 72 8.492(5.094-14.158) 5.362(2.811-10.228) 0.001
No 29 286 1
Anemia Yes 64 111 5.275(3.191-8.718) 3.669(1.968-6.8400 0.001
No 27 247 1
Newborn weight Low birth weight 47 30 11.679(6.700-20.358) 5.363(2.760-10.420) 0.001
Normal birth weight 44 328 1
Placental weight Low weight 75 129 8.321(4.653-14.881) 4.984(2.530-9.816) 0.001
Normal weight 16 229 1
Complications in this pregnancy Yes 60 56 10.438(6.212-17.537) 4.629(2.444-8.767) 0.001
No 31 302 1
Iron Folic Acid taken Yes 24 276 1
No 67 82 9.396(5.545-15.922) 2.897(1.330-6.309) 0.007
IPV Yes 70 84 10.873(6.302-18.761) 5.613(3.011-10.328) 0.001
No 21 274 1
Antenatal depression Depressed 72 81 12.959(7.381-22.752) 5.184(3.733-13.827) 0.001
Not depressed 19 277 1

Key: 1 indicates references category, COR: crude odds ratio, AOR: adjusted odds ratio.

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of fetal malnutrition and its associated factors among term newborns delivered in Jimma Zone public hospitals. The prevalence of fetal malnutrition was 20.3% (95% CI: 16.5–24) which was consistent with other studies finding conducted in Karnataka, India 21.2% [11], Mangalore, India 24% [12] Madhya Pradesh, India 18.5% [13], Uttarakhand, India 17.39% [14], Nepal 18% [5], Portugal 17.5% [15], Ilesha, South‑West, Nigeria 18.8% [2] and south Gonder zone, Ethiopia (21.7% [1].

However, the finding of this study is higher than studies conducted in the United States 10.9% [16], Spain 7.6% [17], Port Harcourt, Nigeria 16.7% [4], Lagos, Negeria14.5% [18], Bhopal, India 8.3% [19], and Debre Markos, Ethiopia 12.32% [7], the discrepancy might be due to multiple factors; America study may be due to difference in food program, socioeconomic between developed country’s than in this study under developing countries. The difference between this study and the study conducted in Spanish [17], might be the variation in the study design; the Spanish study employed a follow-up study design, but this study used a cross-sectional study. A discrepancy between our study findings and the findings from the Nigerian study [18] may be the selection criteria. The study conducted in Nigeria focused on term babies delivered at a tertiary hospital and mothers who received antenatal care, however, our study was conducted both on mothers with ANC and without ANC follow-up and also included mothers from primary, general, and referral hospitals.

The prevalence of fetal malnutrition in our study 20.3% was lower than findings reported in other studies: in Turkey 54.8% [20], New Delhi India 27.97% [21], Karnataka, India 52.9% [3], Nigeria 33.9% [22], and Iraq 31% [23]. These discrepancies may be due to several factors such as, The study in Turkey includes preterm newborns, which are known to be more susceptible to malnutrition [24]. The difference between our study and the one conducted in New Delhi, India, might be due to the time difference between the studies. Healthcare systems, economic factors, and nutritional landscapes can change over time. The study in Karnataka, India, focused on a rural setting, where limited access to healthcare services and antenatal care during pregnancy can contribute to a higher prevalence of fetal malnutrition [25], however, this study includes both rural and urban areas.

In this study, mothers aged less than 19 years were twice more likely to deliver malnourished newborns as compared to mothers who give birth in the age group of 25–29 years old with malnutrition. Supported by studies conducted in India [5], Nepal [14], Nigeria [4] and Debre Markos [7]. A possible justification might be that biologically, younger mothers’ bodies may not be fully mature, which can affect the development of the placenta, which plays a critical role in delivering nutrients and oxygen to the fetus [26].They may be more susceptible to nutritional deficiencies due to nutrition and the adolescent transition are closely intertwined, since eating patterns and behaviors are influenced by many factors, including peer influences, parental modeling, food availability, food preferences, cost, convenience, personal and cultural beliefs, mass media, and body image [27].

The current study revealed that, rural residents were more likely to give malnourished newborns as compared to urban residents, this finding aligns with a study’s finding in Nigeria [18], and Debre Markos [7]. This variation may be due to several factors. Rural areas often have fewer healthcare providers and limited access to prenatal care, which can hinder the identification and management of nutritional deficiencies during pregnancy [28]. Additionally, there might be lower awareness about the importance of proper nutrition during pregnancy in rural communities, potentially leading to inadequate dietary intake.

In addition, factor significantly associated with a high risk of fetal malnutrition was not receiving dietary counseling. These findings align with previous research conducted in the United States [29], Nigeria [2], and Debre Markos [7]. A possible justification might be that: Dietary counseling during pregnancy can uncover underlying issues contributing to malnutrition risks. This includes eating disorders, and cultural restrictions on certain foods due to pregnancy beliefs. By counseling all pregnant women, these issues can be identified and addressed more effectively promoting better health outcomes for both mother and baby. Dietary counseling goes beyond just addressing malnutrition. It empowers women to make informed choices about their diet, fostering a sense of control and confidence throughout pregnancy and beyond [30].

Furthermore, not taking Iron and Folic Acid (IFA) supplementation during pregnancy is also associated with fetal malnutrition. This finding is supported by studies conducted in the United States, Nigeria, and Debre Markos [2,7,29]. A possible explanation might be that Iron-folic acids (IFA) supplements address deficiencies in specific nutrients and it is crucial for both mother and baby during pregnancy. It prevents anemia that restricts oxygen delivery to the fetus, hindering its growth and development. Furthermore, iron plays a vital role in placental function, promoting proper nutrient and oxygen exchange between mother and fetus. With a low level of iron, the placenta may not function optimally, further contributing to fetal malnutrition [31]. This highlights the importance of taking IFA during pregnancy to prevent fetal malnutrition.

Moreover, other variables statistically associated with fetal malnutrition in this study were, anemia, complications in current pregnancy, and infections during pregnancy. These findings align with studies conducted in Uttarakhand, India, Nepal, and Nigeria [2,3,5,6,13,14]. The possible reasons might be that: Anemia during pregnancy might be a risk for malnourished newborns due to it reduces oxygen and nutrient delivery to the fetus, hinders placental function, and can negatively impact the mother’s health [32], all of which can contribute to fetal malnutrition and potentially lead to low birth weight and other health problems for the newborn.

Pregnancy complications were another factor strongly associated with fetal malnutrition. These might be that, first, by increasing nutritional demands: Certain complications can increase the mother’s nutrition needs, leaving less available for the fetus. Second, some complications or illnesses can disrupt the body’s absorption or utilization of nutrients from food, leading to deficiencies and impairing the placenta’s function [33], the critical organ responsible for delivering nutrients and oxygen to the fetus and compromising placental blood flow and nutrient exchange. This limited supply of essential building blocks for growth can lead to fetal malnutrition.

Infection during pregnancy is significantly associated with fetal malnutrition this is supported by studies conducted in India, Nepal, and Nigeria [2,3,13,14]. A possible justification might be that: Infections can cause a decrease in appetite, nausea, and vomiting in the mother. This can lead to inadequate dietary intake and malnutrition in the mother herself [34]. Since the mother is the primary source of nutrition for the fetus, her malnutrition can directly impact fetal growth and development. Also, infections can cause changes in blood flow patterns within the mother’s body. This can lead to a decrease in blood flow to the uterus and placenta, limiting the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the fetus [35]. Early diagnosis, treatment, and close monitoring can lessen infection risks to fetal health.

This study found a significant association between maternal mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and fetal malnutrition. Mothers with low MUAC had malnourished newborns than mothers with higher MUAC. This finding aligns with research conducted in India, Nepal, Nigeria, and Debre Markos [2,5,7]. Possible explanations might be that: MUAC is a measure of muscle and fat stores in the mother. A low MUAC often reflects chronic energy deficiency in the mother, meaning she’s not consuming enough calories to meet her needs and those of the developing fetus. This limited energy intake translates to insufficient nutrients reaching the baby, potentially leading to malnutrition [36]. And also low maternal nutritional status may compromise the function of the placenta.

In this study, having a malarial was significantly associated with fetal malnutrition. This finding aligns with previous studies conducted in India, Nigeria, and Debre Markos [2,4,7]. Possible Reasons might be that: Malaria infection can lead to inflammation and nutrient deficiencies, impacting the transfer of essential nutrients from mother to fetus or causing fatigue and loss of appetite, further limiting the mother’s nutrient intake and leading to malnutrition in the mother and the developing fetus [37]. Using ITN helps prevent malaria infection during pregnancy, potentially reducing the negative consequences for fetal growth and development. The current study identified drug use during pregnancy, particularly analgesics (pain relievers), as a significant risk factor for fetal malnutrition. This finding aligns with studies conducted in Nigeria and Nepal [2,5]. A possible Reason could be that drug use can disrupt a pregnant woman’s appetite and eating habits, leading to her not consuming enough calories and nutrients to support both her and the developing baby. This may lead to placental insufficiency: Drugs can interfere with the placenta’s function, which is the organ responsible for transferring nutrients and oxygen from the mother to the fetus [38,39].

This study identified low placental weight is significantly associated with fetal malnutrition. These findings are consistent with previous research conducted in India, Nigeria, Gonder, and Debre Markos [1,2,7,40]. Possible Reasons might be that: Low placental weight can often indicate underlying issues with placental development or function. These issues can involve problems with blood vessel formation, impaired nutrient transport mechanisms, or hormonal imbalances. These can hinder the placenta’s ability to nourish the developing fetus, potentially leading to malnutrition. A healthy placenta is a well-developed organ with a large surface area and efficient blood flow. When the placenta is smaller and lighter than expected, its ability to transport these vital elements is compromised. This limited supply of nutrients and oxygen can lead to fetal malnutrition [41].

The finding of this study also shows that fetal malnutrition is five times more common in newborns with low birth weight than newborns with normal birth weight. This finding is consistent with other studies conducted in the United States, Pune, India, Nigeria, and Gonder [1,4,42]. A possible reason could be fetal malnutrition as the cause: in most cases, fetal malnutrition is the underlying cause of low birth weight. When a fetus doesn’t receive adequate nutrients and oxygen due to factors like maternal undernutrition, placental problems, or infections, their growth is restricted. This limited growth can lead to low birth weight, indicating the baby may be malnourished. Low birth weight as an Indicator: Low birth weight doesn’t necessarily equate to malnutrition. There can be other reasons for a baby to be smaller, such as genetics or premature birth. However, low birth weight, particularly when accompanied by factors like poor muscle tone or thin skin, is a strong indicator that the baby may have experienced some degree of fetal malnutrition [43].

Mothers experiencing intimate partner violence were five times as likely to have malnourished newborns compared to those not experiencing IPV in the current study. This finding is in line with studies conducted in the United States and Gonder [1,44,45]. The possible reasons could be that mothers with experiences of intimate partner violence may be restricted from access to nutritious foods due to financial limitations imposed by the abuser or inability to obtain groceries that limit their dietary choices and also may be limited to access or attend prenatal care appointments [46]. Additionally, some mothers experiencing IPV may turn to drugs or alcohol as a coping mechanism, which has a detrimental impact on the developing fetus, leading to malnutrition and other health problems [47].

In the current study, antenatal depression was a significant factor associated with fetal malnutrition. Mothers with antenatal depression are more likely to deliver malnourished newborns compared to those without depression. This finding is aligning with studies conducted in Australia [48], and Toronto [49]. A possible explanation: Mothers with depression may experience a loss of interest in healthy eating, leading them to skip meals, choose less nutritious options, or neglect their dietary needs. These can limit the essential nutrients reaching the developing fetus [50]. Additionally, depression may make it difficult for some mothers to attend prenatal care appointments, which are crucial for monitoring fetal growth and development. A depressed mother might not have the energy to prepare nutritious meals.

Strength and limitation of the study

For this study, the CAN score, which relies on physical observation of newborns, may be susceptible to subjectivity. There may be a potential bias in gestational age estimation due to limitations in recalling the last menstrual period, ultrasound accuracy, and rapid assessment techniques. Additionally, there might be social desirability bias in assessing intimate partner violence, where participants may underreport negative experiences.

Conclusion and recommendation

This study found a high prevalence of malnutrition among newborns delivered in Jimma Zone public hospitals indicating at least one newborn was malnourished among five delivered newborns. Maternal age, maternal residency (rural), not gating dietary counseling, food taboos, low maternal MUAC, not taking Iron and Folic Acid, drug use during pregnancy, anemia, infection, complication during pregnancy, malaria, antenatal depression, intimate partner violence, lower placental weight, were factors associated with fetal malnutrition. Therefore, this study recommended that all concerned bodies should be engaged in mitigate intimate partner violence, prevent infections during pregnancy, enhance maternal nutrition counseling, and address the issue of teenage pregnancy.

Supporting information

S1 File. Data set for the study.

(SAV)

pone.0332596.s001.sav (180.3KB, sav)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all data collectors, study participants, and public health facility administrators/heads.

Abbreviations and acronyms:

AGA

Average Gestational Age

ANC

Antenatal Care

BMI

Body Mass Index

CANSCORE

Clinical Assessment of the Nutritional Status

CNS

Central Nervous System

FM

Fetal Malnutrition

IFA

Iron and Folic Acid

IRB

Institutional Review Board

ITN

Insecticide-Treated bed Net

IMC

Integrated Management of Childhood Illness

IPV

Intimate Partner Violence

IUGR

Intrauterine Growth Restriction

JUMC

Jimma University Medical Center

LBW

Low Birth Weight

LDL

Low-Density Lipoprotein

MUAC

Mid-Upper Arm Circumferences

NICU

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

PI

Ponderal Index

SGA

Small for Gestational Age

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Science

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Tesfa D, Teshome F, Ambaw B. Fetal Malnutrition and Associated Factors among Term Newborn Babies at Birth in South Gondar Zone Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia. Int J Pediatr. 2021;2021:5005365. doi: 10.1155/2021/5005365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adebami OJ, Oyedeji GA, Owa JA, Oyelami OA. Maternal factors in the etiology of fetal malnutrition in Nigeria. Pediatr Int. 2007;49(2):150–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2007.02328.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Janardhan AM, Alok S, Janardhan L. Detection of fetal malnutrition and its associated maternal factors in a rural setting. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2020;7(9):1880–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Josiah AE, Opara PI, Nte AR. Prevalence of and risk factors for fetal malnutrition in term babies delivered at a tertiary hospital in southern Nigeria. Journal of Clinical Neonatology. 2018;7(1):31–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Poudel A, Bhatta NK, Regmi MC, Shah L, Paudel R. Assessment of Common Maternal Risk Factors in Fetal Malnutrition. Birat J Health Sci. 2021;6(1):1377–82. doi: 10.3126/bjhs.v6i1.37641 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Singh S, Sharif M, Achanta N, Jafri N. Maternal health: A reflector for fetal malnutrition. Indian Journal of Child Health. 2019;6(7):353–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sume BW. Fetal malnutrition and associated factors among newborn babies delivered at Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2023;18:100543. doi: 10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100543 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rushdi RA, Rushdi AM. Karnaugh-Map Utility in Medical Studies: The Case of Fetal Malnutrition. Int J Math, Eng, Manag Sci. 2018;3(3):220–44. doi: 10.33889/ijmems.2018.3.3-016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Organization WH. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence: World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Smith-Nielsen J, Matthey S, Lange T, Væver MS. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against both DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1965-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lakkappa L, Somasundara S. Assessment of fetal nutrition status at birth using the clinical assessment of nutritional status score. Indian Journal of Child Health. 2018;5(12):713–6. doi: 10.32677/ijch.2018.v05.i12.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Soundarya M, Basavaprabhu A, Raghuveera K, Baliga B, Shivanagaraja B. Comparative Assessment of Fetal Malnutrition by Anthropometry and CAN Score. Iran J Pediatr. 2012;22(1):70–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kapoor A, Awasthi S, Yadav A, Tiwari S. Assessment of Foetal Malnutrition Using CAN Score and its Comparison With Various Anthropometric Parameters and Proportionality Indices. J Nepal Paedtr Soc. 2021;41(3):320–6. doi: 10.3126/jnps.v41i3.35535 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nikhurpa M, Nikhurpa V, Pangty S. International Journal of Pediatric Research. 2021;8:82–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singhal V, Agal P, Kamath N. Detection of fetal malnutrition by CAN score at birth and its comparison with other methods of determining intrauterine growth. Indian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2012;22(11):575–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Metcoff J. Clinical assessment of nutritional status at birth. Fetal malnutrition and SGA are not synonymous. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1994;41(5):875–91. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38836-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martínez-Nadal S, Demestre X, Raspall F, Vila C, Álvarez J, Sala P. Assessment of foetal nutrition status at birth using the CANS score. An Pediatr (Barc). 2016;84(4):218–23. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2015.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ezenwa BN, Iroha EO, Ezeaka VC, Egri-Okwaji MTC. Comparative study of Clinical Assessment of Nutritional status score and proportionality indices in the assessment of fetal malnutrition in term newborns. Niger Med J. 2016;57(2):124–8. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.182075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kashyap L, Dwivedi R. Detection of fetal malnutrition by clinical assessment of nutritional status score (CAN score) at birth and its comparison with other methods of determining intrauterine growth. Pediatric Oncall Journal. 2006;3(1):9–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Korkmaz A, Tekşam O, Yurdakök M, Yiğit S, Tekinalp G. Fetal malnutrition and its impacts on neonatal outcome in preterm infants. Turk J Pediatr. 2011;53(3):261–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sankhyan N, Sharma VK, Singh S. Detection of fetal malnutrition using “CAN score”. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2009;76(9):903–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ezenwa BN, Ezeaka VC. Is canscore a good indicator of fetal malnutrition in preterm newborn. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2018;54(1):57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajme.2017.01.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Almarzoki JM, Jasim RD. Comparative study between clinical assessment of nutritional status score (CAN score) and anthropometry in the assessment of fetal malnutrition. International Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;3(7):8–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hay WW Jr. Aggressive Nutrition of the Preterm Infant. Curr Pediatr Rep. 2013;1(4):10.1007/s40124-013-0026–4. doi: 10.1007/s40124-013-0026-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hamel C, Enne J, Omer K, Ayara N, Yarima Y, Cockcroft A, et al. Childhood Malnutrition is Associated with Maternal Care During Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Bauchi and Cross River States, Nigeria. J Public Health Res. 2015;4(1):408. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kirchengast S, Hartmann B. Impact of maternal age and maternal somatic characteristics on newborn size. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Council. 2003;15(2):220–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Das JK, Salam RA, Thornburg KL, Prentice AM, Campisi S, Lassi ZS, et al. Nutrition in adolescents: physiology, metabolism, and nutritional needs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1393(1):21–33. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Weinhold I, Gurtner S. Understanding shortages of sufficient health care in rural areas. Health Policy. 2014;118(2):201–14. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Christian P, Mullany LC, Hurley KM, Katz J, Black RE. Nutrition and maternal, neonatal, and child health. Elsevier. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Arrish J, Yeatman H, Williamson M. Midwives’ Role in Providing Nutrition Advice during Pregnancy: Meeting the Challenges? A Qualitative Study. Nurs Res Pract. 2017;2017:7698510. doi: 10.1155/2017/7698510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sungkar A. The role of iron adequacy for maternal and fetal health. World Nutrition Journal. 2021;5:10–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mahajan SD, Singh S, Shah P, Gupta N, Kochupillai N. Effect of maternal malnutrition and anemia on the endocrine regulation of fetal growth. Endocr Res. 2004;30(2):189–203. doi: 10.1081/erc-200027380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Loverro MT, Di Naro E, Nicolardi V, Resta L, Mastrolia SA, Schettini F, et al. Pregnancy Complications, Correlation With Placental Pathology and Neonatal Outcomes. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2022;2:807192. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.807192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Katona P, Katona-Apte J. The interaction between nutrition and infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(10):1582–8. doi: 10.1086/587658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Johnson DC. Maternal infection and adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes. Clin Perinatol. 2005;32(3):523–59. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2005.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ververs MT, Antierens A, Sackl A, Staderini N, Captier V. Which anthropometric indicators identify a pregnant woman as acutely malnourished and predict adverse birth outcomes in the humanitarian context?. PLoS Currents. 2013;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.De Beaudrap P, Turyakira E, White LJ, Nabasumba C, Tumwebaze B, Muehlenbachs A, et al. Impact of malaria during pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in a Ugandan prospective cohort with intensive malaria screening and prompt treatment. Malar J. 2013;12:139. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jones HE, Kraft WK. Analgesia, Opioids, and Other Drug Use During Pregnancy and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Clin Perinatol. 2019;46(2):349–66. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sebastiani G, Borrás-Novell C, Alsina Casanova M, Pascual Tutusaus M, Ferrero Martínez S, Gómez Roig MD. The Effects of Alcohol and Drugs of Abuse on Maternal Nutritional Profile during Pregnancy. Nutrients. 2018;10(8):1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chisholm KM, Folkins AK. Placental and Clinical Characteristics of Term Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Case-Control Study. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2016;19(1):37–46. doi: 10.2350/15-04-1621-OA.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Coan PM, Angiolini E, Sandovici I, Burton GJ, Constância M, Fowden AL. Adaptations in placental nutrient transfer capacity to meet fetal growth demands depend on placental size in mice. J Physiol. 2008;586(18):4567–76. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.156133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Adebami OJ, Owa JA. Comparison between CANSCORE and other anthropometric indicators in fetal malnutrition. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75(5):439–42. doi: 10.1007/s12098-008-0069-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Negrato CA, Gomes MB. Low birth weight: causes and consequences. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2013;5:49. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-5-49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 44.Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1331–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alhusen JL, Lucea MB, Bullock L, Sharps P. Intimate partner violence, substance use, and adverse neonatal outcomes among urban women. J Pediatr. 2013;163(2):471–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.01.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Testa A, Lee J, Semenza DC, Jackson DB, Ganson KT, Nagata JM. Intimate partner violence and barriers to prenatal care. Soc Sci Med. 2023;320:115700. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schaefer LM, Howell KH, Sheddan HC, Napier TR, Shoemaker HL, Miller-Graff LE. The Road to Resilience: Strength and Coping Among Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(17–18):8382–408. doi: 10.1177/0886260519850538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dadi AF, Miller ER, Bisetegn TA, Mwanri L. Global burden of antenatal depression and its association with adverse birth outcomes: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8293-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grigoriadis S, VonderPorten EH, Mamisashvili L, Tomlinson G, Dennis C-L, Koren G, et al. The impact of maternal depression during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(4):e321-41. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07968 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Barker ED, Kirkham N, Ng J, Jensen SKG. Prenatal maternal depression symptoms and nutrition, and child cognitive function. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(6):417–21. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.129486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Tebelay Dilnessa

22 Apr 2025

Dear Dr. Awoke,

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 06 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tebelay Dilnessa, MSc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that there are restrictions to data sharing for this study. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

Before we proceed with your manuscript, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., a Research Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board, etc.). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. You also have the option of uploading the data as Supporting Information files, but we would recommend depositing data directly to a data repository if possible.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments:

  • Use of English language is poor in certain sections and would require a detailed revision.

  • Line 15: Thus, this study aimed to assess predictor……….

  • Lines 17 and 18: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 449-term newborns using systematic sampling techniques in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals from April 1, 2024 to July 30, 2024.

  • In the abstract and result, the absolute number (numerator and denominator) is needed together with the percentage. For example, A/B (C%).

  • Line 72: Materials and methods

  • Line 80: April 1, 2024 to July 30, 2024.

  • Line 222: (Table 1); remove the word ‘see’; similarly, make a correction for other table and figure citations.

  • Table 6: Follow appropriate scientific notations, for example: this, .924(.315-2.712) should be written as, 0.924(0.315-2.712)

  • Add the following to the declaration section: Ethical approval and consent to participate, Consent for publication, Data availability statement, Competing interest and Funding statement

  • All supplementary files title/description should be written below reference lists

  • The author should follow uniform font size, font type, paragraphing, etc.

  • Follow the standard binomial nomenclature, italize journal name and the word ‘et al’

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: First of all, I would like to appreciate this informative study for the overlooked problem. Fetal malnutrition is currently a public health problem, particularly in developing countries. Such studies are very important for early advocating of maternal well beings. However the authors should address the following issues before publication.

Title: the word “predictors" is not favorable since it was cross-sectional, better to replace with "associated factors".

Abstract: please state separately methods of data collection for maternal data and newborn data (CAN score). Please say p-value less than 0.05. Delete “finally". Please include number of male and female newborns in parentheses. Intimate partner violence and low placental weight needs operational definition in the method section. Please rewrite your conclusion. No need of this study, previous study? Please state your major findings in two or three statements. Even your recommendation is beyond the findings of your study. Please get English language proficiency from native speakers.

Introduction: please revise your introduction particularly the coherence and grammar including punctuations. Dear authors even you missed some published studies, try to include all existing evidences to give best information to the readers.

Methods: dear authors, would you explain why you extend the age of newborns up to 48 hours? Why not within 24 hours?

Please give your suit why 24 - 48 hours post-partum?

Sample size - why you take 0.04?

Who collects the CAN score data? Does the data collectors get CAN score training? Who gave the training?

I am not clear with your independent variables, please clear and simple. Rather it is important to move to the operational definition section.

Result: In your logistic regression table please write only the exact p- values.

How do you classify the placental weight? Have you record the morphology type?

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Bickes Wube Sume

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 18;20(9):e0332596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332596.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


6 Jul 2025

Response to academic editors and reviewers

Academic Editor1.

� Data availability statement

Authors’ response: - all the data are fully available without restriction and it is within the manuscript and its supporting information

� Use of English language is poor in certain sections and would require a detailed revision.

• Line 15: Thus, this study aimed to assess predictor……

Authors’ response: Thus, this study aimed to assess prevalence and associated factors of fetal malnutrition among term newborn babies in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals. (Found in line 17&18)

� Lines 17 and 18

Authors’ response: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 449-term newborns using systematic sampling techniques in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals from April 1, 2024 to July 30, 2024 (found in line 20&21)

� In the abstract and result, the absolute number (numerator and denominator) is needed together with the percentage. For example, A/B (C %)

Authors’ response: Thank you for your feedback we incorporate these comments in the revised manuscript

� Line 72: Materials and methods

Authors’ response: Materials and Methods (found in line 82)

� Line 80: April 1, 2024 to July 30, 2024

Authors’ response: April 1, 2024 to July 30, 2024 (found in line 90&91.

� Line 222: (Table 1); remove the word ‘see’; similarly, make a correction for other table and figure citations.

� Table 6: Follow appropriate scientific notations, for example: this, .924(.315 -2.712) should be written as, 0.924(0.315-2.712)

Authors’ response: Thank you for your valuable feedback. We have made the necessary corrections based on your suggestions and have reflected them in the revised manuscript

� Add the following to the declaration section: Ethical approval and consent to participate, Consent for publication, Data availability statement, Competing interest and Funding statement

Authors’ response: Thank you for your valuable feedback. We have add those parts in the declaration section in the revised manuscript

Response to reviewer

Reviewer 1

� Title: the word “predictors" is not favorable since it was cross-sectional, better to replace with "associated factors

Authors’ response: Dear Reviewer, thank you for your valuable comments and feedback. As per your suggestion, we have replaced the term "predictors" with "associated factors" in the title. Fetal malnutrition and associated factors among term newborn babies in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals, South West Ethiopia

� Abstract: please state separately methods of data collection for maternal data and newborn data (CAN score). Please say p-value less than 0.05. Delete “finally". Please include number of male and female newborns in parentheses.

Authors’ response: Under abstract part we add the method of data collection for maternal data is face-to-face interviews and reviewing medical records using semi-structured interviewer administered questionnaire and newborn data is collected by physical observation of fetal nutritional status using standardized tool (CAN score).

� We add number of female and male newborn in the parentheses, among delivered newborns 220 (49%) were males and 229 (51%) were females

� Please rewrite your conclusion. No need of this study, previous study? Please state your major findings in two or three statements. Even your recommendation is beyond the findings of your study. Please get English language proficiency from native speak

Authors’ response: Conclusion: The prevalence of fetal malnutrition in this study indicates one in five delivered newborn. Newborns with low birth weight, low placental weight, and mothers having anemia, intimate partner violence (IPV), antenatal depression, teenage pregnancy, malaria, infection, and complications during pregnancy were a strong association with fetal malnutrition. Therefore, this study recommended that all concerned bodies should be engaged in mitigate intimate partner violence, prevent infections during pregnancy, enhance maternal nutrition counseling, and address the issue of teenage pregnancy.

� Introduction: please revise your introduction particularly the coherence and grammar including punctuations. Dear authors even you missed some published studies, try to include all existing evidences to give best information to the readers.

Authors’ response: We appreciate your comments on the introduction section. We have made efforts to improve the grammar and coherence in the revised manuscript accordingly.

� Methods: dear authors, would you explain why you extend the age of newborns up to 48 hours? Why not within 24hours? Please give your suit why 24 - 48 hours post-partum?

Authors’ response: The reason for extending the age of the newborn up to 48 hours was to ensure the inclusion of mothers who delivered via cesarean section, allowing sufficient time for them to stabilize before obtaining their medical history in a comfortable and appropriate condition.

� Sample size - why you take 0.04?

Authors’ response: We used a 4% margin of error based on previous research findings confidence interval. In determining the sample size, we considered the p-values and confidence intervals reported in earlier studies. This margin of error was chosen to enhance the precision and reliability of the study results. Selecting an appropriate margin of error is essential for ensuring the accuracy and validity of our statistical estimates.

Who collects the CAN score data? Does the data collectors get CAN score training? Who gave the training?

Authors’ response: The newborn data were collected by BSc midwives under the supervision of MSc midwives who has work experiences in neonatal side. Prior to data collection, the principal investigators provided training on the use of the CAN score, including guidance on how to assess and assign scores based on the loss of fat and muscle mass across various physical characteristics of the newborn

� Intimate partner violence and low placental weight needs operational definition in the method section

Authors’ response: Dear academic editors, Thank you for your valuable feedback in operational definition of these variables, in the revised manuscript we put the operational definitions accordingly

How do you classify the placental weight? Have you record the morphology type?

Authors’ response: We classified the placenta after measuring its weight using newborn weighting scale measurement, thickness, and length by using tape meter. The classification was based on placental weight, distinguishing between low placental weight and normal placental weight, following the criteria established by previous research studies, as referenced in the manuscript

� I am not clear with your independent variables, please clear and simple. Rather it is important to move to the operational definition section.

Authors’ response: Our independent variables include various maternal characteristics, categorized into the following factors: socio-demographic factors, maternal nutritional and behavioral factors, obstetric factors, medical factors, psychosocial factors, and fetal factors. The fetal factors include the weight of the newborn, sex, weight of the placenta, and gestational age. We have listed the specific variables under each category.

� Result: In your logistic regression table please write only the exact p- values.

Authors’ response: We appreciate your comment regarding the logistic regression table. Accordingly, we have made the necessary revisions as per your suggestion

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers (1).docx

pone.0332596.s003.docx (23.6KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Tebelay Dilnessa

18 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Awoke,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 01 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tebelay Dilnessa, MSc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

  • Table 6: P=0.000, What does it mean.The author should make it meaningful.

  • Table 6: Why you consider as a reference age group from 25-34? Do you have reason?

  • The denominator still should be included in the percentage of your both in the abstract and main result.

  • Some of the tables can be integrated and prepared. Think of it.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: the findings of this study are very important to prevent neonatal life sequelae due to fetal malnutrition, and informative for the ANC services . All my comments were fully addressed, I think it is feasible for publication.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Bickes Wube Sume

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 18;20(9):e0332596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332596.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


28 Aug 2025

Response to academic editors and reviewers

First of all I would like to thank you for giving us the opportunity to submit a revised draft of the manuscript “Fetal malnutrition and associated factors among term newborn babies in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals, South West Ethiopia” we appreciate the time and effort that you and the reviewers dedicated to providing feedback on our manuscript and are grateful for the insightful comments on and valuable improvement to our paper. We have incorporated most of the suggestions made by the academic editors and reviewers. Those changes are highlighted in the revised manuscript with track changes. Please see below, in blue, for a point- by-point response to the academic editors and reviewers comments and concerns.

Academic Editor1.

Table 6: P=0.000, what does it mean. The author should make it meaningful.

Authors’ response: - Thank you for your valuable feedback. We agree with your point, and in the revised manuscript we have approximated this number to 0.001 for clarity and consistency

Table 6: Why you consider as a reference age group from 25-34? Do you have reason?

Authors’ response: - Thank you for raising this important point. The comment is correct, and we agree with the observation. The reason for considering the age group 25–34 years as the reference category is that it represents the biological optimum and lowest-risk reproductive age group. Women in this age bracket are often at their peak reproductive potential, with high fertility and relatively lower risks of pregnancy complications compared to younger mothers (<20 years) and older mothers (≥35 years).

For studying risk factors such as fetal malnutrition, it is necessary to identify a ‘baseline’ group for comparison. The 25–34 age range provides this baseline because it reflects the most physiologically stable and nutritionally favorable stage, thereby minimizing the influence of age-related risks. Furthermore, evidence from epidemiological studies consistently demonstrates a U-shaped relationship between maternal age and adverse outcomes: increased risks at the extremes (<20 and ≥35 years), with the lowest risk observed in the middle group (25–34 years). For these reasons, this age group is commonly used as the reference category in similar studies.

The denominator still should be included in the percentage of your both in the abstract and main result

Authors’ response: - Thank you for this valuable comment. In the revised manuscript, we have included both the denominators and the corresponding percentages in the relevant sections.

Some of the tables can be integrated and prepared. Think of it.

Authors’ response: - Thank you for your observation. Yes, the tables have been integrated. Specifically, we have combined Table 3 and Table 4, which presented maternal obstetric and medical factors, into a single table in the revised manuscript

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited

Authors’ response: -Thank you for this constructive comment. Although the reviewer did not recommend specific previously published works, the suggestion to check for uncited relevant literature was very helpful. We carefully reviewed the existing body of evidence, and most of the relevant studies have now been incorporated

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript.

Authors’ response: - Thank you for your observation. We have carefully reviewed the entire reference list to ensure its completeness and accuracy, and the necessary corrections have been made. These updates have been highlighted in the revised manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

pone.0332596.s004.docx (20.8KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Tebelay Dilnessa

2 Sep 2025

Fetal Malnutrition and Associated Factors Among Term Newborn Babies in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals, Southwest Ethiopia

PONE-D-24-57243R2

Dear Dr. Awoke,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Tebelay Dilnessa, MSc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Tebelay Dilnessa

PONE-D-24-57243R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Awoke,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Tebelay Dilnessa

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Data set for the study.

    (SAV)

    pone.0332596.s001.sav (180.3KB, sav)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers (1).docx

    pone.0332596.s003.docx (23.6KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pone.0332596.s004.docx (20.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES