Skip to main content
The Journal of Tehran University Heart Center logoLink to The Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
. 2024;19(Suppl 1):17–23. doi: 10.18502/jthc.v19is1.18475

Prevalence and Short-Term Outcomes of Postprocedural Complete Heart Block in Congenital Heart Disease Correction in Children

Chehreh Mahdavi 1, Mohammad Reza Sabri 1, Alireza Ahmadi 1, Mehdi Ghaderian 1, Hamid Bigdelian 2, Bahar Dehghan 1, Davood Ramezani Nezhad 1, Ladan Sadat Salamati 1, Atefeh Bamarinejad 3, Fatemeh Bamarinejad 3, Mobina Haji Mirsaidi 1,*
PMCID: PMC12445797  PMID: 40979850

Abstract

Background:

Complete heart block (CHB) is a known complication of congenital heart disease (CHD) corrections in children. However, data on the prevalence and short-term outcomes of postprocedural CHB in this population are scarce.

Objectives:

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and short-term outcomes of postprocedural CHB in pediatric patients undergoing surgical or transcatheter procedures to correct CHD.

Method:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on pediatric patients under 18 years old who underwent CHD corrections between March 2019 and April 2020 at a tertiary cardiac center in Isfahan, Iran. Patients with a history of arrhythmia or heart block before surgery were excluded. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to identify cases of postprocedural CHB. The prevalence, risk factors, and short-term outcomes of postprocedural CHB were analyzed.

Result:

This study involved 840 patients with a mean age of 3.4 ± 4.3 years, with 47.8% being male. CHB was identified in 22 patients (2.6%) during the postprocedural period, with a prevalence of 0.6% in the transcatheter group and 4.7% in the surgical group. Patients with postprocedural CHB were younger than non-CHB patients. The most common CHDs were patent ductus arteriosus and ventricular septal defect (VSD). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that the type of procedure (surgical method) and the type of CHD (VSD) correlated with postprocedural CHB. Patients who developed postprocedural CHB had a longer mean stay in the pediatric cardiac critical care unit than non-CHB patients. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was 5.2%, with no correlation between CHB occurrence and in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion:

The findings highlight the importance of attentive monitoring for postprocedural CHB, particularly in younger patients, to facilitate timely intervention and improve outcomes. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term complications and risk factors associated with postprocedural CHB in this patient population.

Keywords: Complete heart block, Congenital heart disease, Pediatric, Postprocedural, Surgical correction

Introduction

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common essential congenital abnormality, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 9 cases per 1000 live births.1, 2 Interventions are frequently required for dealing with CHD to enhance the overall well-being and long-term prognosis of affected pediatric patients.3 The advancement of pediatric healthcare in the last decades has resulted in a notable improvement in survival rates among patients diagnosed with CHD.4, 5 Additionally, improvements in diagnostic methods, catheter-based procedures, and various surgical advancements have contributed to the progress.6, 7 Still, there are potential risks associated with these interventions, and complete heart block (CHB) is a widely recognized conduction-related complication after surgical procedures in pediatric patients, including those undergoing cardiac procedures for CHD.8 The available research indicates a range of 0.05% to 6% incidence during the postoperative phase.812

Postoperative arrhythmias can result from pathological processes as well as patient- and surgery-related factors, such as CHD complexity, myocardial incisions that can directly traumatize the atrioventricular node and conducting system, and the occurrence of localized edema or inflammation that can cause fibrotic tissue.13, 14 The majority of these conditions are transient, although they can lead to significant adverse outcomes.15 It is critical to establish an accurate diagnosis and monitor the prevalence of CHB following open-heart surgery to improve surgical techniques, determine when temporary pacemakers (TPMs) and permanent pacemakers (PPMs) are required, and decrease unfavorable outcomes. Pediatric surgeons and cardiologists should be informed of the prevalence of CHB and employ the most recent techniques to reduce postoperative complications.

Our primary aim was to determine the incidence of CHB following CHD-related cardiac interventions at our institution. Moreover, we investigated the in-hospital prognosis and risk factors associated with the development of postprocedural CHB in children who have undergone CHD interventions.

Methods

Study design and population

A retrospective analysis was conducted at the pediatric cardiac department of Chamran Hospital in Isfahan, Iran. This study involved pediatric patients under 18 years old with CHD diagnosis who received surgical or transcatheter procedures to correct CHD. The study was conducted from March 2019 through April 2020. Patients with a history of arrhythmia or heart block before surgery were excluded. The research obtained ethical clearance from the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Science (Ethical number: IR.MUI.MED.REC.1400.745), adhering to the ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, informed consent was waived. Patient information was coded and anonymized to ensure that it remained confidential.

Data collection

Demographic and perioperative clinical parameters were retrieved from hospital records. These data included age, gender, the type of CHD, and the type of surgical procedure. A standardized data collection sheet was employed to minimize information bias. Following the surgical procedure, consistent electrocardiographic and hemodynamic monitoring of all patients was conducted within the pediatric cardiac critical care unit (PCCU). Additionally, postoperative ECGs were examined for all patients involved in the study, following the established protocols of normal clinical practice. Standard ECG tracings were initially evaluated by a pediatric cardiologist and then by an electrophysiologist to confirm the diagnosis of CHB. To distinguish between transient and permanent CHB, a period of about 10 to 14 days was considered for CHB recovery in transient ones.

Outcome assessment

The primary outcome of interest was the prevalence of transient and permanent postprocedural CHB in children undergoing CHD correction. Secondary outcomes included the need for temporary or permanent pacing, the length of PCCU stay, in-hospital mortality, and the risk factors associated with postprocedural CHB.

Statistical Analysis

The data in the study were presented in terms of frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. The Shapiro-Wilk test was employed to assess the normality of all continuous variables. The χ2 or Fisher exact test was utilized for categorical variables in descriptive statistics, while the independent samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was employed for continuous variables. A univariate analysis (binary logistic regression) was performed between each demographic and clinical variable and CHB occurrence to identify the potential predictors of postprocedural CHB. Subsequently, all these variables were included in a multiple logistic regression model to control for potential confounders and ensure that the associations observed were not simply due to the influence of other variables. The results of the binary logistic regression model are presented as the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical significance was defined as P-values<0.05. IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 870 patients underwent transcatheter or surgical procedures during the study period. Of them, 840 patients were included in the study (Figure 1). The mean age of the study population was 3.4 ± 4.3 years, and 47.8% were male. CHB was determined in 22 patients (2.6%) in the postprocedural period. A total of 471 patients underwent the transcatheter procedure, and 369 patients underwent surgery. The prevalence of CHB in the transcatheter and surgical groups was 0.6% and 4.7%, respectively. Patients with postprocedural CHB were younger than those who did not suffer from this complication, and this difference was statistically significant (mean ± SD: 1.91 ± 2.65 vs 3.45 ± 4.33 y; P = 0.014). The prevalence of postprocedural CHB after CHD correction in pediatric patients younger than 2 years old was 3.4% (17 of 488 patients), and this prevalence was 1.4% (5 of 351 patients) in those older than 2 years (P = 0.066). Concerning CHD classification as cyanotic and acyanotic, the frequency of cyanotic diseases was higher in the CHB group than in the non-CHB group, and this difference tended to be significant (31.8% vs 22.8%; P = 0.054). The most common CHD in the study was patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Whereas all PDA patients in the CHB group were comorbid with other CHDs, none of the patients in the CHB group had isolated PDA. Furthermore, the frequency of VSD was higher in patients with CHB than in the non-CHB group (63.6% vs 34.3%; P = 0.005). Additionally, 40.9% of patients with CHB also had both VSD and PDA defects. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the studied patients.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The image illustrates the flow diagram of the studied patients.

Table 1.

Baseline and postoperative characteristics concerning the incidence of postoperative CHB

Variables Total (N = 840) CHB (N = 22) Non-CHB (N = 818) P-value 2
Age 3.41±4.3 1.91±2.65 3.45±4.33 0.014*
Gender (male) 402(47.8%) 8(36.3%) 394(48.1%) 0.27
Type of Procedure
Transcatheter 471(56.07%) 3(13.6%) 468(57.2%) 0.001>*
Surgery 369(43.9%) 19(86.3%) 394(48.1%)
Type of CHD
Cyanotic 194(23.09%) 7(31.8%) 187(22.8%) 0.054
Acyanotic 635(75.5%) 15(68.1%) 619(75.6%)
Other # 11(1.3%) 0(0.00%) 11(1.3%)
VSD 296(35,2%) 14(63.6%) 281(34.3%) 0.005*
ASD 245(29.1%) 7(31.1%) 238(29.09%) 0.78
AVSD 30(3.5%) 2(9.09%) 28(3.4%) 0.18
PDA 405(48.2%) 16(72.7%) 389(47.5%) 0.02*
TGA 65(7.7%) 3(13.6%) 62(7.5%) 0.24
TOF 104(12.3%) 4(18.1%) 100(12.2%) 0.28
Length of PCCU stay 3.95±7.12 11.18±12.07 3.75±6.85 0.001>*
Postoperative in-hospital 44(5.2%) 2(9.09%) 42(5.1%) 0.41
mortality

CHB, Complete heart block; CHD, Congenital heart disease; VSD, Ventricular septal defect; ASD, Atrial septal defect; AVSD, Atrioventricular septal defect; PDA, Patent ductus arteriosus; TGA, Transposition of the great arteries; TOF, Tetralogy of Fallot; PCCU, Pediatric critical care unit

*

Significant difference at the 0.05 level.

#

Other: eg, dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac tumor, congenital stenosis of the aortic valve, and arteriovenous fistula

Univariate and then multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of postprocedural CHB (Table 2). Univariate regression analyses showed that the type of procedure (surgical method) and the type of CHD (VSD) correlated with the incidence of postprocedural CHB, and these factors remained significant after multivariate regression (surgical method: univariate OR: 8.49, 95% CI: 2.49 to 28.92; P = 0.001 and multivariate OR: 6.45, 95% CI: 1.72 to 24.08; P = 0.006 and VSD: univariate OR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.38 to 8.03; P = 0.007 and multivariate OR: 3.45, 95% CI: 1.25 to 9.48; P = 0.01).

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine independent predictors of postprocedural CHB in pediatric patients with CHD

Variables Univariate Multivariate
OR CI P-value OR CI P-value
Age 0.89 0.77–1.02 0.10 0.95 0.82–1.11 0.56
Gender (male) 0.61 0.25–1.47 0.27 0.52 0.21–1.30 0.16
Type of surgery (surgical method) 8.49 2.49–28.92 0.001* 6.45 1.72–24.08 0.006*
Type of CHD (cyanotic) 1.57 0.63–3.91 0.33 5.22 0.07–390 0.45
VSD 3.33 1.38–8.03 0.007* 3.45 1.25–9.48 0.01*
ASD 1.13 0.45–2.81 0.78 1.73 0.64–4.63 0.27
AVSD 2.81 0.62–12.63 0.17 4.05 0.74–22.08 0.10
PDA 2.92 1.13–7.55 0.02* 1.21 0.37–3.91 0.75
TGA 1.92 0.55–6.66 0.30 7.19 0.09–527 0.36
TOF 1.59 0.52–4.79 0.40 13.11 0.17–974 0.24

CHB, Complete heart block; CHD, Congenital heart disease; VSD, Ventricular septal defect; ASD, Atrial septal defect; AVSD, Atrioventricular septal defect; PDA, Patent ductus arteriosus; TGA, Transposition of the great arteries; TOF, Tetralogy of Fallot

All patients with permanent CHB were female. However, a comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with transient and permanent CHB revealed no significant differences in age, type of CHD, or type of surgical procedure (Table 3). Fourteen patients had transient CHB, and 8 had permanent CHB that required PPM implantation (Table 4). CHB occurred at a median (IQR) duration of 0.5 (0–1.25) days after the procedure. In cases of transient CHB, the duration of TPM use was 5 ± 4.04 days. The mean length of stay in the PCCU was higher in the CHB group than in the non-CHB group, with the difference constituting statistical significance (mean±SD: 11.18 ± 12.07 vs 3.75 ± 6.85 d; P < 0.001, mean difference: 7.42, 95% CI: 4.44 to 10.41). Still, there was no difference in the length of PCCU stay between the permanent and transient CHB groups. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate in the study population was 5.2%. In addition, the rate of in-hospital mortality in the CHB group was 9%, and no correlation was found between the occurrence of CHB and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.41).

Table 3.

Comparison of baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes regarding transient and permanent CHB

Variables Transient CHB (N = 14) Permanent CHB (N = 8) Mean difference (95% CI) P-value
Age 2.21±3.04 1.38±1.84 −0.83 (−3.32 –1.64) 0.48
Gender (male) 8(57.1%) 0(0.00%) - 0.009*
Type of surgery
Transcatheter 11(78.5%) 8(100%) - 0.23
Open 3(21.4%) 0(0.00%) -
Type of CHD
Cyanotic 4(28.5%) 3 (37.5%) - 0.51
Acyanotic 10(71.4%) 5(62.5%) -
VSD 10(71.4%) 4(50%) - 0.29
ASD 4(28.5%) 3(37.5%) - 0.51
AVSD 1(7.1%) 1(12.5%) - 0.60
PDA 9(64.2%) 7(87.5%) - 0.25
TGA 3(41.4%) 0(0.00%) - 0.23
TOF 1(7.1%) 3(37.5%) - 0.11
Time from the procedure to CHB occurrence 2.14±6.32 2.00±3.33 −0.14 (−5.19 –4.91) 0.94
TPM duration 4.07±3.66 9.33±3.05 5.26 (0.39 – 10.13) 0.036*
Length of PCCU stay 9.79±14.51 13.63±5.95 3.83 (−7.46 – 15.14) 0.48
Postoperative in-hospital mortality 0(0.0%) 2(25%) - 0.39

CHB, Complete heart block; CHD, Congenital heart disease; VSD, Ventricular septal defect; ASD, Atrial septal defect; AVSD, Atrioventricular septal defect; PDA, Patent ductus arteriosus; TGA, Transposition of the great arteries; TOF, Tetralogy of Fallot; TPM, Temporary pacemaker; PCCU, Pediatric critical care unit

*

Significant difference at the 0.05 level.

Table 4.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of each patient

Patients Gender Age (y) Type of Procedure Type of CHB Type of CHD CHD Time from the Procedure to CHB Occurrence Type of Pacemaker TPM Duration In-Hospital Outcome
1 Male 2 Surgical transient CHB Acyanotic VSD/ PDA 0 TPM 2 alive
2 Male <1 Transcatheter transient CHB Cyanotic ASD/ PDA/TGA 0 TPM 9 die
3 Female 1 Surgical permanent CHB Cyanotic PDA/ TOF 0 PPM - alive
4 Female <1 Surgical transient CHB Acyanotic VSD 0 TPM 10 alive
5 Male 2 Surgical transient CHB Acyanotic VSD 0 TPM 2 alive
6 Male 2 Transcatheter transient CHB Acyanotic VSD/ ASD 0 Medical treatment 0 alive
7 Female <1 Transcatheter transient CHB Acyanotic Other 0 TPM 0 die
8 Female 11 Surgical transient CHB Cyanotic VSD/TGA 0 TPM 2 alive
9 Female 3 Surgical permanent CHB Acyanotic VSD 0 PPM - alive
10 Female <1 Surgical permanent CHB Acyanotic ASD/ PDA 0 PPM - alive
11 Female 1 Surgical transient CHB Cyanotic VSD /PDA/TGA 0 TPM 1 alive
12 Female 5 Surgical permanent CHB Cyanotic PDA/ TOF 1 PPM - alive
13 Male <1 Surgical transient CHB Acyanotic ASD/ AVSD/PDA 1 TPM 8 alive
14 Female 1 Surgical transient CHB Cyanotic PDA/TOF 1 TPM 2 alive
15 Female 5 Surgical transient CHB Acyanotic VSD / ASD /PDA 1 TPM 5 alive
16 Male 2 Surgical transient CHB Acyanotic VSD /PDA 1 TPM 2 alive
17 Female <1 Surgical permanent CHB Acyanotic VSD /PDA 1 both 12 alive
18 Female 2 Surgical permanent CHB Cyanotic VSD /PDA/TOF 2 both 6 alive
19 Male 5 Surgical transient CHB Acyanotic VSD /PDA 2 TPM 4 alive
20 Female <1 Surgical permanent CHB Acyanotic VSD /ASD / PDA 2 PPM 10 alive
21 Female <1 Surgical permanent CHB Acyanotic ASD /AVSD /PDA 10 PPM - alive
22 Male <1 Surgical transient CHB Acyanotic VSD /PDA 24 TPM 10 alive

CHB, Complete heart block; CHD, Congenital heart disease; VSD, Ventricular septal defect; ASD, Atrial septal defect; AVSD, Atrioventricular septal defect; PDA, Patent ductus arteriosus; TGA, Transposition of the great arteries; TOF, Tetralogy of Fallot; TPM, Temporary pacemaker; PPM, Permanent pacemaker

Discussion

In this retrospective study, the postprocedural prevalence of CHB independently of the CHD correction in pediatric patients was 2.6%, with 60% being transient CHB and the remaining 40% classified as permanent CHB. The study population’s in-hospital outcome investigation revealed that although CHB was linked to longer PCCU stays in patients, no correlation was discovered between postprocedural CHB and in-hospital mortality.

Surgical repair operations have been observed to boost the long-term prognosis of pediatric patients diagnosed with CHD. It must be kept in mind, nevertheless, that these procedures are not without risks. One of the most common postoperative complications is cardiac arrhythmia. In the literature, one-third of the cases of postoperative arrhythmias following CHD correction are CHB.16

The present study revealed a prevalence of 4.7% for post-surgical CHB in pediatric patients with CHD. In previous investigations, the incidence of these complications has similarly been observed to range from 2% to 6%.8, 9,1719 In a study conducted by Jeffery et al,4 annual assessments over 10 years, from 2000 through 2009, involving 16,105 pediatric patients under 24 months of age who underwent repair of ventricular septal defect, atrioventricular canal, and tetralogy of Fallot revealed that 4.1%, 7.7%, and 3.7% of these patients developed postprocedural CHB, respectively. The incidence of postprocedural CHB was between 4.5% and 5.2% during 4 time points. Furthermore, there was no significant change over time in the frequency of postprocedural CHB between patients undergoing repair of VSD, atrioventricular canal, and tetralogy of Fallot.

In another study involving 6333 children between 0 and 21 years of age who underwent cardiac surgery for CHD between 2010 and 2019, 2% of the studied cases developed post-surgical CHD.

In our study, out of 471 patients who underwent transcatheter corrective intervention, CHB occurred in 3 cases diagnosed with ASD/PDA/transposition of the great arteries, VSD/ASD, and aortic stenosis/pulmonary stenosis/pulmonary insufficiency. While our study found a lower incidence of CHB in patients who underwent transcatheter intervention compared with patients who underwent surgical repair, there have been reports of an increased incidence of CHB following transcatheter procedures in other research.2022

Although early correction of CHD in children has been associated with a reduction in mortality rates in recent decades, the likelihood of postoperative complications may increase with age in these patients. In the current study, early CHD correction was associated with an increased risk of CHB occurrence. Besides being younger, previous studies have identified a correlation between VSD, particularly cases involving the perimembranous region, and an increased risk of CHB development following CHD repair. This association has been documented in the existing literature. Murray et al18 conducted a study to examine the impact of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics on children who underwent corrective intervention for CHD. They identified several independent predictors of CHB occurrence following an intervention, such as VSD closure, preoperative digoxin exposure, duration of aortic cross-clamping, and the presence of the GJA5 polymorphism. Edwin et al23 observed that the presence of VSD, either in isolation or as a component of conotruncal anomalies, was identified as a significant anatomical risk factor for CHB.

However, studies that identify the electrophysiologic sites of CHB following open-heart surgery remain limited. Identifying the incidence of early and delayed atrioventricular block after surgical and transcatheter closure of VSDs is potentially important because it can be a point of comparison for new techniques such as transcatheter VSD device closure.21

Romer et al8 conducted a multicenter registry-based study involving 15,901 patients who underwent surgical correction of CHD and reported that the incidence of atrioventricular block was 2.7%. Similar to our findings, in this study, the average length of hospitalization in patients with transient atrioventricular block and those with PPM implantation was longer than that in other patients. Nonetheless, contrary to our results, in this study, in-hospital mortality in the PPM group was 3 times higher. Additionally, in the transient atrioventricular block group, it was almost twice that of patients in whom atrioventricular block did not occur.

In our study, 86% of patients who underwent TPM implantation had a resolution within 10 days or less. According to the study by Madani et al,9 the likelihood of recovery following PPM implantation increases with advancing age and higher body weight. In this study, 91% of the cases were resolved by the 10th postprocedural day. Consistent with these findings, guidelines suggest that a PPM be placed for post-surgical heart block after 7 to 10 days as a Class I indication.15, 24

Our study has certain limitations that need to be acknowledged. Firstly, the study was observational in nature and nonrandomized, which may have influenced the results. Secondly, the study relied on retrospective chart reviews and medical records, which may have led to incomplete data. Additionally, the study was conducted at a single center, and the findings may not apply to other centers or populations. The impact of factors such as autonomic tone, growth, and age on PR interval and electrophysiologic measurements was not evaluated through dynamic ECG tracings. Moreover, the study did not account for various factors that could affect the development of CHB, such as genetic polymorphisms and QRS escape rhythm morphology. The lack of detail regarding decision-making around PPM placement further limits the evaluation. Lastly, long-term atrioventricular nodal conduction assessment was not included, which may have led to an underestimation of the incidence of postprocedural CHB. These limitations may restrict the applicability of the study’s results to a broader population or different healthcare settings. The lack of randomization and incomplete data collection could introduce bias and affect the reliability of the conclusions drawn from the study. The failure to account for various influencing factors and the lack of evaluation of long-term outcomes may lead to an incomplete understanding of the development and management of postoperative arrhythmias. Therefore, it is essential to interpret the study findings with caution and consider these limitations when applying the results to clinical practice or future research. Future research is needed to identify predictive factors and improve management protocols for patients with CHB to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with postoperative arrhythmia.

Conclusion

The prevalence of CHB in children following CHD correction was 2.6%. Pediatric patients undergoing CHD reconstructive surgery, particularly at a younger age, should be closely monitored for this potential postoperative complication. While postprocedural CHB does not appear to worsen short-term mortality, it is associated with an increased length of stay in the PCCU. Future studies should explore the relationship between CHB occurrence and long-term outcomes.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The research obtained ethical clearance from the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, adhering to the ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (ethics code: IR.MUI.MED.REC.1400.745). Due to the retrospective nature of this study, informed consent was waived. Patient information was coded and anonymized to ensure that it remained confidential.

Acknowledgments

We extend our heartfelt gratitude to all the participants involved in this study.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no competing interests.

Notes:

This paper should be cited as: Mahdavi C, Sabri MR, Ahmadi A, Ghaderian M, Bigdelian H, Dehghan B, et al. Prevalence and Short Term Outcomes of Postprocedural Complete Heart Block in Congenital Heart Disease Correction in Children. J Teh Univ Heart Ctr 2024;19(S1):17-23.

References

  • 1.Liu Y, Chen S, Zühlke L, Black GC, Choy M, Li N, Keavney BD. Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970–2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(2):455–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Micheletti A. Congenital heart disease classification, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Congenit Hear Dis Nurs care Handb. 2019;1–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Erikssen G, Liestøl K, Seem E, Birkeland S, Saatvedt KJ, Hoel TN, Døhlen G, Skulstad H, Svennevig JL, Thaulow E. Achievements in congenital heart defect surgery: a prospective, 40-year study of 7038 patients. Circulation. 2015;131(4):337–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morris CD, Menashe VD. 25-year mortality after surgical repair of congenital heart defect in childhood: a population-based cohort study. Jama. 1991;266(24):3447–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mandalenakis Z, Rosengren A, Skoglund K, Lappas G, Eriksson P, Dellborg M. Survivorship in children and young adults with congenital heart disease in Sweden. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):224–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Knowles RL, Bull C, Wren C, Dezateux C. Mortality with congenital heart defects in England and Wales, 1959–2009: exploring technological change through period and birth cohort analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(10):861–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gilboa SM, Salemi JL, Nembhard WN, Fixler DE, Correa A. Mortality resulting from congenital heart disease among children and adults in the United States, 1999 to 2006. Circulation. 2010;122(22):2254–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Romer AJ, Tabbutt S, Etheridge SP, Fischbach P, Ghanayem NS, Reddy VM, Sahulee R, Tanel RE, Tweddell JS, Gaies M. Atrioventricular block after congenital heart surgery: analysis from the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(3):1168–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Madani R, Aronoff E, Posey J, Basu M, Zinyandu T, Chai P, Whitehill R, Maher KO, Beshish AG. Incidence and recovery of post-surgical heart block in children following cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young. 2023;33(7):1150–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Öztürk E, Kafalı HC, Tanıdır İC, Şahin GT, Onan İS, Haydin S, Güzeltaş A, Ergül Y. Early postoperative arrhythmias in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;29(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ibrahim LA, Soliman MM, Gad Elkarim A, El Tantawy AE. Frequency and Risk Factors of Early Complete Heart Block Post Cardiac Surgery in Children: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Pediatr Sci J. 2023;3(1):44–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khosroshahi AJ, Samadi M. Evaluation of Early Complete Heart Block and the Use of TPM and PPM After Open Heart Surgery in Children. Chart. 2020;70:80. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moreno R, Dobarro D, López de Sá E, Prieto M, Morales C, Calvo Orbe L, Moreno-Gomez I, Filgueiras D, Sanchez-Recalde A, Galeote G. Cause of complete atrioventricular block after percutaneous aortic valve implantation: insights from a necropsy study. Circulation. 2009;120(5):e29–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peretto G, Durante A, Limite LR, Cianflone D. Postoperative arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: incidence, risk factors, and therapeutic management. Cardiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:615987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Members C, Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Kerber RE, Naccarelli GV, Schoenfeld MH. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to. Circulation. 2002;106(16):2145–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ishaque S, Akhtar S, Ladak AA, Martins RS, Memon MKY, Kazmi AR, Mahmood F, ul Haque A. Early postoperative arrhythmias after pediatric congenital heart disease surgery: a 5-year audit from a lower-to middle-income country. Acute Crit care. 2022;37(2):217–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ayyildiz P, Kasar T, Ozturk E, Ozyilmaz ISA, Tanidir IC, Guzeltas A, Ergul Y. Evaluation of permanent or transient complete heart block after open heart surgery for congenital heart disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39(2):160–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Murray LE, Smith AH, Flack EC, Crum K, Owen J, Kannankeril PJ. Genotypic and phenotypic predictors of complete heart block and recovery of conduction after surgical repair of congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(3):402–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lin A, Mahle WT, Frias PA, Fischbach PS, Kogon BE, Kanter KR, Kirshbom PM. Early and delayed atrioventricular conduction block after routine surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(1):158–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bleiziffer S, Ruge H, Hörer J, Hutter A, Geisbüsch S, Brockmann G, Mazzitelli D, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. Predictors for new-onset complete heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(5):524–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Predescu D, Chaturvedi RR, Friedberg MK, Benson LN, Ozawa A, Lee K-J. Complete heart block associated with device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(5):1223–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patel S, Jamoor K, Khan A, Maskoun W. Late onset complete heart block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement treated with permanent his-bundle pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(1):194–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Edwin F, Aniteye E, Tettey M. Permanent complete heart block following surgical correction of congenital heart disease. Ghana Med J. 2010;44(3):109–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Silka MJ, Shah MJ, Silva JNA, Balaji S, Beach CM, Benjamin MN, Berul CI, Cannon B, Cecchin F, Cohen MI. 2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients: Executive summary. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2022;15(3):323–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Tehran University Heart Center are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES