Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 27.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Surg. 2025 Sep 2;112(9):znaf185. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf185

A Comparison of Women and Men with Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Heather Ngai 1, Sydney Olson 2, John Curci 3, Andris Kazmers 4, Murray Shames 5, Shirling Tsai 6, William Blackwelder 7, Jon S Matsumura 8, B Timothy Baxter 9, Michael Terrin 7, Jennifer S Albrecht 7
PMCID: PMC12445839  NIHMSID: NIHMS2144263  PMID: 40966672

Abstract

Background:

Sex-related differences between men and women with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have implications for patient care and research. Women are less likely to be affected by AAA than men in the United States. This study explored sex-related differences in patient characteristics, aneurysm growth and clinical outcomes in the Non-invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA3CT).

Method:

We conducted a retrospective cohort study performing a secondary analysis of data from N-TA3CT (NCT01756833), a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial assessing doxycycline treatment of AAA. We included 166 N-TA3CT participants with baseline AAA maximum transverse diameter ≤ 4.5 cm and at least one follow-up computed tomography scan. We compared patient characteristics, aneurysm growth rates, adverse events, and clinical outcomes between men and women.

Results:

Among 166 participants, 35 (21.1%) were women and 131 (78.9%) were men. Women were more likely than men to have a family history of AAA, (31.4%% vs.16.0%, p=.05). Women were less likely to take statins (68.6% vs. 84.7%, p = .05) and any antiplatelet agent (48.6% vs. 77.9%, p =.001). Women had significantly faster annual AAA growth rates than men, (0.21 vs. 0.16 cm per year, p <.001).

Conclusions:

Within the size range of 3.5 cm to 4.5 cm, AAAs grow faster in women than in men. Women with AAA report a family history of AAA more frequently than men do.

Keywords: Sex, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Growth rate

Introduction

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are present in 0.5% to 1.3% of women and 4.0% to 7.6% of men 65 years of age and older.(14) Although the prevalence of AAA is higher in men, women who develop AAAs have been reported to have faster growth and increased rupture rates at smaller diameters.(5, 6) The proportion of AAA that meet guideline recommendations for surgical intervention that are untreated is greater in women than men; and women’s risk of AAA rupture within 5 years has been reported to be higher than men’s.(7)

Our understanding of AAA disease in women is poorly informed, as exemplified by the uncertainty of the diameter threshold for elective repair of asymptomatic patients.(8) This is partly related to the small number of women enrolled in AAA clinical trials.(911) The importance of expanding this understanding is underscored by the significantly higher mortality of women vs. men with AAA.(12)

The Non-invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA3CT, NCT01756833) was a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial assessing doxycycline to reduce AAA growth in patients with small infrarenal AAA, i.e., 3.5 cm – 5.0 cm (men) and 3.5 cm - 4.5 cm (women). The present analysis, using data from N-TA3CT, compares sex-related differences in patient characteristics, aneurysm growth assessed using serial computed tomography (CT) scans, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.(13)

Methods

Study Design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from N-TA3CT. The clinical trial design and methods have been previously reported.(9, 13) The protocol was approved by the institutional review boards at all clinical sites, core laboratories, and coordinating centers. All randomized participants provided written informed consent. The trial reported that among patients with small infrarenal AAA, doxycycline compared with placebo did not significantly reduce maximum transverse diameter (MTD) growth over the course of 2 years.(9)

Study Population

For the current study we restricted analyses to men and women with baseline MTD ≤4.5 cm who had at least two CT scans to calculate growth rate. The MTD restriction was made because the N-TA3CT eligibility criteria were set to accommodate standard of care surgical interventions at 5.0 cm MTD for women. We restricted our study population to those with MTD ≤4.5 cm at baseline so that men and women would be comparable. Since doxycycline did not affect AAA growth,(9) the two treatment arms were pooled for analyses. Patients with fusiform and saccular appearance of aneurysms were included.

Growth Rate Assessment

Abdominal and pelvic CT scans were obtained using a standardized image acquisition (section thickness less than or equal to 2.5 mm, reconstruction overlap minimum 50%, narrow field-of-view centered on aorta) protocol at baseline and approximately every 6 months after randomization.(13, 14) CT scans were analyzed in a central Imaging Core Laboratory with validated measurement techniques by a single reader with an intra-class correlation coefficient exceeding 0.99.(9, 13) The single reader underwent quarterly proficiency testing compared to three other readers in the corelab to ensure there was no systemic drift over time, and measurements were performed without comparison to prior values. Infrarenal AAA MTD was measured from outer wall to outer wall with a clinically validated technique using electronic calipers in an image perpendicular to the centerline using the double-oblique technique.(15) Individual growth rates (cm/year) were assessed with ordinary least-squares linear regression across all available CT measurements (i.e., up to 6). Linear growth was defined by an R2 value of at least .90 for the regression model.

Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events

Clinical outcomes in the current analysis were defined as surgical repair of AAA or death within the two-year N-TA3CT trial period. Adverse events were defined as frequent joint pain, headache, gastric or intestinal upset, bleeding or bruising, spells of dizziness, visual disturbance, moderate to severe sunburn, skin rash, tooth discoloration, or persistent fever at any point during the two-year N-TA3CT trial. We also assessed discontinuation of treatment (placebo or doxycycline).

Statistical analyses

Continuous variables are reported as mean (standard deviation, SD) or median (interquartile range, IQR). Categorical data are reported as count (%). Two-sample Student’s t-tests (two tailed) were used to compare continuous variables and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare categorical data.

Comparison of growth rates between men and women was performed using linear mixed models. Baseline variables associated with sex at p ≤.1 were added to the regression model. The final comparison in both adjusted and unadjusted models was based on the interaction between sex and time for MTD with both main effects (sex and time) in the model. We plotted growth rate as a function of baseline MTD by sex and tested the significance of the sex term by regressing growth rate on baseline MTD and sex in a linear model. Additionally, we examined a three-way interaction (sex, time, and treatment assignment) for MTD. Interaction was examined between sex and treatment assignment for all adverse events using logistic regression. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata MP 17.0 (StataCorp LLC). p-values <.05 were taken to be statistically significant.

Results

Of the 261 people randomized in the N-TA3CT trial, 95 were excluded (93 with MTD >4.5 cm and 2 with <2 CT scans), leaving 166 (131 men and 35 women) who met study criteria and were included in the present analysis. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Mean age was 70.9 (SD 7.4) years for men and 70.4 (SD 7.5) for women (p =.73). Mean baseline MTD did not differ significantly between men (4.1 cm (SD 0.3)) and women (4.0 cm (SD 0.3)), (p =.17). Women were more likely than men to report a family history of AAA (31.4%% vs.16.0%, p =.05). Women were less likely to take statins (68.6% vs. 84.7%, p = .05), or any antiplatelet (48.6% vs. 77.9%, p =.001) compared to men. Women were less likely to report a history of diabetes (17.1% vs. 23.7%), but this difference was small and not statistically significant (p = .50).

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the Non-invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Clinical Trial with Maximum Transverse Diameter (MTD) between 3.5cm and 4.5cm at Baseline and more than one Computed Tomography Scan, n=166

Men
(n=131)
Women
(n=35)
p value*
Age, years 70.9 (7.4) 70.4 (7.4) .73
AAA MTD 4.1 (0.3) 4.0 (0.3) .17
Height, cm 176.5 (7.8) 163.9 (7.7) <.001
Body Mass Index 29.5 (5.5) 28.0 (4.5) .10
Plasma Biomarkers
 MMP-9 36.0 (27.1, 54.2) 44.8 (30.9, 94.5) .12
 CRP 2.2 (1.2, 4.5) 2.7 (1.2, 5.8) .31
Treatment Assignment .52
 Doxycycline 69 (52.7) 18 (51.4)
 Placebo 62 (47.3) 17 (48.8)
Tobacco Use .40
 History of Smoking 79 (60.3) 17 (48.6)
 Current Smoker 45 (34.4) 15 (42.9)
 Never Smoker 7 (5.3) 3 (8.6)
Comorbidities
 Atrial Fibrillation 17 (13.0) 4 (11.4) .99
 Cancer 38 (29.0) 11 (31.4) .84
 COPD 27 (20.6) 9 (25.7) .50
 Coronary Artery Disease 55 (42.0) 10 (28.6) .18
 Diabetes 31 (23.7) 6 (17.1) .50
 Family History of AAA 21 (16.0) 11 (31.4) .05
 Hypercholesterolemia 104 (79.4) 23 (65.7) .12
 Heart Failure 9 (6.9) 2 (5.7) .99
 Kidney disease 23 (17.6) 4 (11.4) .45
 Myocardial infarction 24 (18.3) 3 (8.6) .20
 Stroke 13 (9.9) 3 (8.6) .99
Medications
 Anti-Hypertensives
  Beta blocker 70 (53.4) 18 (51.4) .85
  Diuretics 42 (32.1) 12 (34.3) .84
  ACE inhibitor 47 (35.9) 8 (22.9) .16
  Calcium channel blocker 31 (23.7) 7 (20.0) .82
  Angiotensin receptor blocker 21 (16.0) 8 (22.9) .33
 Statin 111 (84.7) 24 (68.6) .05
 Any antiplatelet 102 (77.9) 17 (48.6) .001
  Daily Aspirin 94 (71.8) 17 (48.6) .02

Data are presented as n (%), mean ± standard deviation, or median (interquartile range)

*

p -value from Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t-test, or Wilcoxon Rank Sum;

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;

Angiotensin converting enzyme

Aneurysm Growth

Over an average of 3.1 study visits with 92% of men and 83% of women having ≥4 visits, mean growth rate was significantly faster in women (0.21 cm/year; 95% CI 0.19, 0.23) than in men (0.16 cm/year; 95% CI 0.15, 0.17), p <.001. This difference in AAA growth rate (0.05 cm/year; 95% CI 0.03, 0.07) remained unchanged after adjustment for history of hyperlipidemia, height, family history of AAA, statins, and any anti-platelet therapy. When we forced smoking, diabetes, and treatment assignment into our regression model, the estimates for the difference, statistical significance and 95% CI remained unchanged. The Figure displays growth rate as a function of baseline AAA MTD in men and women. On average, women had faster growth at every MTD value relative to men (p =.02). The three-way interaction between sex, treatment assignment, and time was statistically significant (p =.003). Women on doxycycline grew faster (0.25 cm/year; 95% CI 0.22, 0.28) than women on placebo (0.18 cm/year; 95% CI 0.15, 0.21). There was no difference in growth by treatment assignment in men.

Figure.

Figure.

Baseline Maximum Transverse Diameter (MTD) and Growth Rate in Men and Women in the Non-invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial with MTD between 3.5 cm and 4.5 cm and more than one Computed Tomography Scan, n= 166

A linear growth pattern was observed in 82.9% of women and 70.2% of men (p =.20).

Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events

The frequency of aneurysm repair among women during the two-year follow-up was not significantly different from that among men (2.9% vs 0.8%, p =.38) (Table 2). Women were significantly more likely than men to experience frequent headaches (38.2% vs 15.3%, p = .007), dizziness (41.2% vs 22.9%, p = .05), and gastrointestinal upset (64.7 % vs 41.2%, p = .02). Interaction between sex and study treatment was not significant for any of the individual adverse effects. Based on capsule counts and prescriptions, women were more likely than men to permanently discontinue doxycycline treatment (61.1% vs. 18.8%, p <.001). There was no significant difference in mortality (2.7% vs. 1.5%, p =.51).

Table 2.

Adverse Events Reported by Participants in the Non-invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial with Maximum Transverse Diameter between 3.5cm and 4.5cm at Baseline and more than one Computed Tomography Scan, n=166

Men, n = 131 Women, n = 35 p value*
Adverse Events
 Frequent joint pain 83 (63.4) 18 (52.9) .32
 Frequent headache 20 (15.3) 13 (38.2) .007
 Frequent gastric or intestinal upset 54 (41.2) 22 (64.7) .02
 Frequent bleeding or bruising 57 (43.1) 9 (26.5) .08
 Frequent spells of dizziness 30 (22.9) 14 (41.2) .05
 Visual disturbance 33 (25.2) 10 (29.4) .66
 Moderate to severe sunburn 26 (19.9) 6 (17.7) .99
 Skin rash 38 (29.0) 7 (20.6) .39
 Tooth Discoloration 13 (9.9) 4 (11.8) .75
 Fever 14 (10.7) 3 (8.8) .99
Permanent discontinuation of treatment
 Placebo (n=79 (men=62, women =17)) 7 (11.3) 4 (23.5) .20
 Doxycycline (n=87 (men=69, women=18)) 13 (18.8) 11 (61.1) <.001
Aneurysm repair 1 (.8) 1 (2.9) .38
Mortality 2 (1.5) 1 (2.7) .51

Data are presented as n (%)

*

p -value from Fisher’s exact test;

denominator

Discussion

Small AAA grew on average 0.05 cm/year faster in women than men. The strong evidence for this finding stands out in literature that has been less definitive because of the precision of CT scan measurements in the N-TA3CT core laboratory and the sensitivity of the generalized linear model used in analysis. This difference in growth rate would have clinical consequences over the course of five to ten years, placing women over an interventional threshold at 5.0 cm more quickly than men (at 5.5 cm).(16, 17)

While our follow-up is limited, these data suggest that distinct follow-up intervals for women may be appropriate and potentially beneficial. As the evidence for elective repair threshold is based on clinical trials enrolling primarily men, the advocacy of a lower threshold in women is less-informed. In the absence of direct evidence in women, thresholds have been based on ratio hypotheses. A threshold of 5.2 cm has been suggested for elective repair among women, based on targeting a similar ratio of elective/emergent repair rates as observed in men.(18) Absent any ruptures observed in this study population, current repair guidelines seem reasonable.

The present findings are consistent with those from previous studies that reported faster AAA growth rates in women compared to men.(19, 20) A recent larger study of women with AAA, but without men for concurrent comparison, reported that mean annual growth rate increased with MTD size and AAA pathology.(21) Average annual growth rates reported for women with AAA diameter between 3–4.9 cm were consistent with those observed in this study.(21) N-TA3CT did not include women with AAA MDT >4.5 cm. However, based on an average of more than three CT scans per participant, a linear model fit the data well for over 80% of women and 70% of men.

N-TA3CT findings are consistent with those in RESCAN. The meta-analysis performed by the RESCAN investigators reported faster growth in women with small AAA, but the difference was not statistically significant.(22) Their standard error of the estimate of the difference in growth was larger than any other standard error they observed. There was a large variability across RESCAN studies (I2=78%); these studies collected data between 1976–2008 using primarily ultrasound technology. The upper 95% confidence interval of the RESCAN estimate for the difference in AAA growth between men and women across studies was 0.04 cm/year, not far off from our estimate of 0.05 cm/year considering the differences in study performance.(22)

With greater precision of AAA measurement in N-TA3CT due to its strict CT assessment protocol across sites, we were able to detect a significant effect of sex on growth. A difference of 0.05 cm/year is less than the usual CT scan resolution from one year to the next in an individual, but it has an impact over years of follow-up. By measuring MTD perpendicular to the aneurysms’ walls, the present study did not encounter extremely large or small outlier values that were found in ultrasound-based studies such as in Mofidi et al.(19) These orthogonal MTD measurements are more reproducible and accurate than axial CT or ultrasound images used in the previous studies.(14, 23) Additionally, the present analysis was restricted to one congruent range of baseline AAA diameters, avoiding the loss of precision entailed in including men at MTD that excluded women from enrollment.

Most small AAAs in both men and women grew linearly. While women were more likely to have a linear growth pattern (82.9% of women and 70.2% of men), this difference was not statistically significant. These results add to the findings of Olson et al(14) showing that a majority (70%) of AAA undergo linear and predictable growth within a two-year interval.

Women were more likely than men to report a family history of AAA as has been reported previously.(24) Akai et al. found that family history of aortic aneurysm was an independent risk factor for faster growing small AAAs in Japan.(25) The present results are interesting. Future studies could integrate biomarker or genomic data to explore potential mechanisms.

Both statins and anti-platelet agents were self-reported to be used more often in men than in women. There is evidence suggesting that both statins and anti-platelet agents are associated with slower AAA growth.(26, 27) Our data show that the undertreatment of women with cardiovascular disease is a serious and ongoing problem for the medical community to address.(28) But, in the present study the differences between men and women in reported use of statins or anti-platelet agents did not influence the adjusted comparison.

There were observed differences in reported adverse events such as dizziness, headaches, and gastrointestinal effects between men and women which were not significantly associated with doxycycline. However, women were much more likely than men to permanently stop treatment while on doxycycline. Women appear to tolerate full doses of doxycycline less well than men. The high proportion of women who discontinued doxycycline creates uncertainty as to whether the observation of greater growth rate among women assigned to doxycycline is an unusual chance observation or a true biological effect. While there is little clinical implication for our patients as the N-TA3CT results do not support the use of chronic doxycycline regimens, this finding may have importance for other patients. Additional studies on the natural history of AAA growth in women are needed to confirm our estimated growth rate in the placebo group.

These data addressing characteristics and growth of AAA in women represent one of the larger, published cohorts of women with AAA and the largest we know of with a pre-specified CT scan protocol assessed in a core laboratory. However, this study has limitations worth considering. First, the number of women in the study is much smaller than the number of men, limiting efficiency. Given that our findings were statistically significant, questions about power for a test of hypothesis are superceded by a 95% confidence interval which was 0.03–0.07 cm/year for the difference in growth rate. Since N-TA3CT did not include individuals without small AAAs, we cannot discern whether significant differences were a result of sex or a sex-AAA interaction. Follow-up was limited to 2 years. This time period is too short to come to conclusions about rupture or mortality; longer term follow-up would be necessary to determine if the growth findings persist over time.

On average, AAA in women grew 0.05 cm/year faster than in men. Future studies could determine optimal observation intervals according to sex and MTD and inform insight into mechanisms of the difference in growth between men and women with biomarker and genomic studies.

Acknowledgements

We thank the men and women who participated in N-TA3CT without whom this research would not have been possible.

Funding

This work was supported by grants R34AG028684, R01AG037120, and P30AG0288747 from the National Institute on Aging to the University of Maryland, Baltimore, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T35DK095737) and the Office of Women’s Health of the US National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

None

References

  • 1.A comparative study of the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Australia. J Med Screen. 2001;8(1):46–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Derubertis BG, Trocciola SM, Ryer EJ, Pieracci FM, McKinsey JF, Faries PL, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women: prevalence, risk factors, and implications for screening. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(4):630–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al. Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Jama. 2019;322(22):2211–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Svensjö S, Björck M, Wanhainen A. Current prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 70-year-old women. Br J Surg. 2013;100(3):367–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lo RC, Schermerhorn ML. Abdominal aortic aneurysms in women. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(3):839–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW, van der Does E, van Urk H, Hofman A, de Jong PT, et al. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in older adults. The Rotterdam Study. American journal of epidemiology. 1995;142(12):1291–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Talvitie M, Stenman M, Roy J, Leander K, Hultgren R. Sex Differences in Rupture Risk and Mortality in Untreated Patients With Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;10(5):e019592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):2–77.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baxter BT, Matsumura J, Curci JA, McBride R, Larson L, Blackwelder W, et al. Effect of Doxycycline on Aneurysm Growth Among Patients With Small Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2020;323(20):2029–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Golledge J, Pinchbeck J, Tomee SM, Rowbotham SE, Singh TP, Moxon JV, et al. Efficacy of Telmisartan to Slow Growth of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA cardiology. 2020;5(12):1374–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meijer CA, Stijnen T, Wasser MN, Hamming JF, van Bockel JH, Lindeman JH. Doxycycline for stabilization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2013;159(12):815–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tomee SM, Bulder RMA, Meijer CA, van Berkum I, Hinnen JW, Schoones JW, et al. Excess Mortality for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and the Potential of Strict Implementation of Cardiovascular Risk Management: A Multifaceted Study Integrating Meta-Analysis, National Registry, and PHAST and TEDY Trial Data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;65(3):348–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baxter BT, Matsumura J, Curci J, McBride R, Blackwelder WC, Liu X, et al. Non-invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA(3)CT): Design of a Phase IIb, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of doxycycline for the reduction of growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;48:91–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Olson SL, Wijesinha MA, Panthofer AM, Blackwelder WC, Upchurch GR Jr., Terrin ML, et al. Evaluating Growth Patterns of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameter With Serial Computed Tomography Surveillance. JAMA surgery. 2021;156(4):363–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kauffmann C, Tang A, Dugas A, Therasse É, Oliva V, Soulez G. Clinical validation of a software for quantitative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm maximal diameter and growth by CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(3):502–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006;113(11):e463–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR, et al. Editor’s Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024;67(2):192–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tomee SM, Lijftogt N, Vahl A, Hamming JF, Lindeman JHN. A registry-based rationale for discrete intervention thresholds for open and endovascular elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in female patients. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(3):735–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mofidi R, Goldie VJ, Kelman J, Dawson AR, Murie JA, Chalmers RT. Influence of sex on expansion rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2007;94(3):310–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Solberg S, Singh K, Wilsgaard T, Jacobsen BK. Increased growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms in women. The Tromsø study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(2):145–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.DiLosa K, Brittenham G, Pozolo C, Hedayati N, Kwong M, Maximus S, et al. Evaluating growth patterns of abdominal aortic aneurysms among women. J Vasc Surg. 2024;80(1):107–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thompson SG, Brown LC, Sweeting MJ, Bown MJ, Kim LG, Glover MJ, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the growth and rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for surveillance intervals and their cost-effectiveness. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2013;17(41):1–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, et al. Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(6):945–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(1):122–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Akai A, Watanabe Y, Hoshina K, Obitsu Y, Deguchi J, Sato O, et al. Family history of aortic aneurysm is an independent risk factor for more rapid growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms in Japan. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(2):287–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hariri E, Matta M, Layoun H, Badwan O, Braghieri L, Owens AP 3rd, et al. Antiplatelet Therapy, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression, and Clinical Outcomes. JAMA network open. 2023;6(12):e2347296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pan Z, Cui H, Wu N, Zhang H. Effect of Statin Therapy on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth Rate and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;67:503–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim ESH, Arya S, Bryce Y, Gornik HL, Long CA, McDermott MM, et al. Sex Differences in Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2025;151(14):e877–e904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES