Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Sep 2;17(37):52315–52324. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c14624

Redox-Driven Exsolution and Dissolution Behavior of High-Entropy Spinel Catalysts: A Comparative Study of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x

Pei-Tung Chou , Cheng-Chia Kuo , Po-Yang Peng , Ying-Rui Lu , Chi-Liang Chen , Yu-Chuan Lin †,*
PMCID: PMC12447387  PMID: 40892496

Abstract

High-entropy oxides (HEOs) offer tunable redox chemistry and thermal stability for catalytic applications. Here, we compare two spinel-type HEOs, MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x , with similar configurational entropy but different redox behaviors under reverse water–gas shift (RWGS) conditions. Only MnFeCoNiCuO x exhibits reversible exsolution and reincorporation of Fe/Co/Ni/Cu alloy nanoparticles (NPs) during H2–CO2 cycling, as confirmed by in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy and wavelet-transformation. This dynamic restructuring correlates with higher concentrations of oxygen vacancy and exsolved Fe/Co/Ni/Cu alloy NPs, resulting in higher RWGS activity above 400 °C. In contrast, redox-inert Zn2+ in MnCoNiCuZnO x suppresses lattice flexibility and alloy formation. These findings underscore that redox-active cations, rather than entropy alone, govern the regenerative behavior and catalytic performance in HEO systems.

Keywords: dissolution, exsolution, high-entropy oxides, redox, reverse water−gas shift


graphic file with name am5c14624_0010.jpg


graphic file with name am5c14624_0008.jpg

1. Introduction

High-entropy oxides (HEOs) are single-phase crystalline materials comprising five or more cations in near-equimolar ratios, randomly distributed over crystallographic sites. The resultant high configurational entropy thermodynamically stabilizes solid solutions, enabling the formation of otherwise metastable or unstable oxides. This entropy-induced stabilization also imparts structural tunability, distinctive defect chemistry, and enhanced thermal stabilityattributes that position HEOs as promising catalytic platforms for reactions such as the oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. ,

A key feature of HEO chemistry is the dynamic behavior of cations, enabling exsolution and redissolution in redox environments and resulting in self-regenerative structures. This phenomenon was observed in the early 2000s, when Daihatsu Motor and collaborators reported a self-regenerative catalystPd-doped LaFeCoO3exhibiting reversible Pd nanoparticles (NPs) migration under oxidative and reductive conditions. , Similar behaviors were later reported with Rh- and Pt-doped perovskites, where B-site cations undergo exsolution and reincorporation. Other perovskite systems have shown comparable dynamics. For instance, the Bao group used in situ techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning transmission electron microscopy to demonstrate reversible exsolution and redissolution of CoFe NPs in LaSrCoFeMoO3. , Vert et al. studied the redox behavior of Ni in chromites, linking it to electrochemical performance in H2/CH4-fueled solid oxide fuel cells. Key factors enabling redissolution of exsolved NPs include substoichiometric A-site control, B-site cation selection, and tailored pre/post-treatment of perovskites. ,

Configurational entropythe diversity of molecular conformations and stacking in oxidesmay enable HEOs to function as self-regenerative catalysts. This is attributed to two effects: (1) structural disorder lowers Gibbs free energy, stabilizing the host lattice (support), and (2) entropy gain promotes the redissolution and oxidative reformation of NPs into their parent oxides. Zhao et al. and Hou et al. demonstrated this in the redox cycles of CO2 hydrogenation: the former observed Cu/Co/Ni alloy exsolution and dissolution in Co3MnNiCuZnO x , the latter in Co/Fe/Cu/Ni alloys from Zr0.5(NiFeCuMnCo)0.5O x . Shao et al. observed reversible cyclic evolution–dissolution of Ni, Fe, and Co to form Ni/Fe/Co alloys on halite-structured (MgCoNiMnFe)­O x in dry reforming. Light-induced exsolution–dissolution of Co/Ni alloy in Rh-supported CoNiFeZnCrO x in the solar-driven dry reforming of methane was revealed lately.

Despite increasing interest in redox-active HEOs, the mechanisms underlying alloy formation during reduction remain insufficiently understood. It is not yet established whether HEOs with comparable configurational entropy (ΔS config.) necessarily exhibit similar exsolution behavior. These open questions motivate a closer examination of how cation chemistry, rather than entropy alone, dictates the structural dynamics and catalytic function under redox cycling.

In this study, we investigate the exsolution and dissolution behavior of exsolved elements in spinel HEOs, i.e., MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x , with close configurational entropies (ΔS config. = 12.4 and 12.3 J/mol/K, respectively) under reducing (H2) and oxidizing (CO2) atmospheres. Both compositions are chosen based on their successful synthesis as single-phase, entropy-stabilized spinel HEOs to provide a structurally consistent basis for comparison. The redox-driven exsolution and redissolution behavior of HEOs is dependent on the cation chemistry, even when configurational entropy is similar. The MnFeCoNiCuO x catalyst undergoes reversible exsolution of Fe/Co/Ni/Cu alloy domains under H2, followed by reincorporation into the spinel lattice under CO2. This dynamic behavior enhances the adsorption of CO2 through the generation of oxygen vacancies and promotes hydrogenation via the exsolved alloy NPs, collectively leading to an increased reverse water–gas shift (RWGS) rate. In contrast, the redox-inactive Zn2+ in MnCoNiCuZnO x limits structural regeneration, resulting in low RWGS activity. These findings establish that configurational entropy alone does not dictate redox dynamics or catalytic performance; instead, the rational incorporation of redox-active cations is key to unlocking the full potential of HEOs for regenerative CO2 catalysis.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Nickel chloride anhydrous (98%, Sigma-Aldrich), copper chloride anhydrous (98%, SHOWA), cobalt chloride hexahydrate (98%, Sigma-Aldrich), zinc chloride anhydrous (98%, Alfa Aesar), iron chloride hexahydrate (97%, Alfa Aesar), sodium hydroxide (97%, SHOWA), and potassium permanganate (99%, SHOWA) were used as received.

2.2. Catalyst Synthesis

The MnCoNiCuZnO x and MnFeCoNiCuO x catalysts were synthesized using a solid-state ball-milling method. Briefly, 6 mmol of CoCl2·6H2O, 2 mmol of NiCl2, 2 mmol of CuCl2, and 2 mmol of FeCl3 (for MnFeCoNiCuO x ) or 2 mmol of ZnCl2 (for MnCoNiCuZnO x ) were added to a 45 mL zirconium oxide milling jar together with zirconium oxide milling balls with a ball-to-material ratio of 10:1. The mixture was milled in a planetary ball mill (Fritsch Pulverisette 7) at 500 rpm for 2 h. Subsequently, 24 mmol (for MnFeCoNiCuO x ) or 22 mmol (for MnCoNiCuZnO x ) of sodium hydroxide was added, and the mixture was milled for another 2 h. Afterward, 2 mmol of KMnO4 was added, followed by an additional 2 h of milling. The resulting solid was washed with deionized water, separated by centrifugation, dried overnight at 80 °C, and calcined at 600 °C for 2 h (5 °C/min) in an air stream (25 mL/min).

Some characterizations require both fresh and reduced samples, and a reduction step was conducted prior to the analysis. Each catalyst was reduced in a 20% H2/N2 stream from room temperature to 450 °C (10 °C/min) and held at 450 °C for 2 h in a fixed-bed system. The reduced HEOs were denoted as r-MnCoNiCuZnO x and r-MnFeCoNiCuO x .

2.3. Characterization Methods

Catalyst composition was analyzed via inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, Kontron S-35), and textural properties were measured by using N2 physisorption (Micromeritics ASAP 2020). Elemental distribution was examined by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (JEOL JEM-2100F CS) equipped with an Oxford X-Max 20 EDS detector. Crystallinity was assessed by powder XRD (Rigaku SmartLab, Cu Kα). X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) at the Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn K-edges were collected in fluorescence mode at the TPS 32A beamline of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC). Data processing employed Athena (Demeter v0.9.26); wavelet transforms were applied to k 2-weighted XAS using a Morlet function in the k-range of 3–17 Å–1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted on a PHI 5000 VersaProbe spectrometer (Al Kα, 1486.6 eV). To avoid air exposure, samples were transferred via a sealed chamber for quasi-in situ analysis. Binding energies were calibrated to the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV.

Temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) and CO2 desorption (CO2-TPD) were performed by using an AutoChem II system (Micromeritics) with a thermal conductivity detector. Samples were prereduced at 450 °C for 2 h. After CO2 saturation and He purging, CO2-TPD was conducted under He flow (25 mL/min) at a 10 °C/min ramping rate while H2-TPR was conducted in a 10% H2/Ar stream (25 mL/min) at a 10 °C/min ramping rate.

Fourier-transform infrared spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS50 instrument (Thermo Scientific). In situ DRIFTS experiments were performed using a Praying Mantis cell (Harrick Scientific) with CO2–H2 switching: samples were heated from 50 to 350 °C in CO2 (20 mL/min), then switched to H2 (20 mL/min) at 350 °C and held isothermally for 10 min.

In situ XAS was also conducted at the NSRRC (TPS 32A). Samples were sealed in a 1.5 mm capillary, heated using a heat gun, and analyzed at various temperatures under H2 and CO2 streams to monitor Fe and Zn K-edge evolution. The Fe K-edge spectra were collected at room temperature, 350 °C, 400 °C, and 450 °C. Zn K-edge was recorded only at room temperature and 450 °C under comparable conditions.

2.4. Activity Evaluation

Catalytic performance was evaluated in a fixed-bed reactor system. , Approximately 0.03 g of catalyst was loaded into quartz wool plugs. The reaction was carried out under a CO2/H2/N2 mixture (12.5/37.5/50.0 v/v/v) at atmospheric pressure, within a temperature range of 350–500 °C. Each activity data point reflects the average of three independent measurements; the 95% confidence interval, calculated from these replicates, is shown as the error bar. A gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 40,000 mL/gcat/h was applied, and the reactor effluent was kept at 150 °C to avoid condensation. CO2 conversion and product selectivity (CO and CH4) were calculated according to established equations. ,

3. Results

3.1. Unreduced MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x

Table S1 summarizes the elemental compositions determined by ICP-AES and the textural properties measured by N2 physisorption. The molar ratios of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x were approximately 1:1:3:1:1 and 1:3:1:1:1, respectively, in good agreement with the target stoichiometries. By resorting to the elemental compositions, the ideal mixing formula (ΔS config. = −R i = 1 x i ln x i ) is used to calculate the changes of configurational entropy for MnFeCoNiCuO x (12.4 J/mol/K) and MnCoNiCuZnO x (12.3 J/mol/K). Both HEOs exhibited comparable surface areas (46.8 and 52.6 m2/g) and pore volumes (0.36 and 0.28 cm3/g), indicating similar porous characteristics (see Figure S1).

Figure a,b presents the TEM-EDS elemental mapping of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x , respectively. Both samples exhibit uniform elemental dispersion, consistent with the formation of single-phase HEOs. The widespread Cu signals are partially attributed to the use of a Cu grid as the sample holder; however, the confinement of Cu signals within the particle boundary also suggests its incorporation into the HEO structure.

1.

1

TEM images and EDS elemental mapping results of (a) MnFeCoNiCuO x and (b) MnCoNiCuZnO x , (c) XAS K-edge spectra of Fe, Mn, Co, Ni, and Cu of MnFeCoNiCuO x , (d) XAS K-edge spectra of Zn, Mn, Co, Ni, and Cu of MnCoNiCuZnO x , (e) XPS spectra of Fe 2p, Mn 2p, Co 2p, Ni 2p, Cu 2p, and O 1s photolines of MnFeCoNiCuO x , and (f) XPS spectra of Zn 2p, Mn 2p, Co 2p, Ni 2p, Cu 2p, and O 1s photolines of MnCoNiCuZnO x .

Figure S2 shows the XRD patterns of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x . Both catalysts had diffractions at 30.6°, 36.0°, 43.7°, 57.4°, 57.7°, and 63.5°, corresponding to the (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440) planes of Fdm (227) spinel Co3O4 (JCPDS #80-1540).

Figure c,d exhibits the XAS K-edge spectra of each cation of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x . The normalized intensity of the pre-edge peak is used as an indicator of the extent of deviation from centrosymmetry: the higher the intensity, the higher the portion of cation located in the tetrahedral position. ,, The normalized pre-edge intensity of MnFeCoNiCuO x showed a decreasing trend as Fe (0.195) > Mn (0.105) > Co (0.093) > Ni (0.025) > Cu (0); the pre-edge intensity of MnCoNiCuZnO x : Mn (0.124) > Co (0.113) > Ni (0.023) > Cu (0). These trends suggest that both HEOs catalysts should be complex spinel structures with partial inversion. , For MnFeCoNiCuO x , Fe cations coexist in tetrahedral and octahedral units, while the Franklinite-like Zn spectrum, which is similar to an ideal normal spinel structure, indicated that Zn cations were in tetrahedral units.

Figure e,f shows the XPS surface analysis of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x and Table S2 presents the relative surface composition of cations. For MnFeCoNiCuO x , the Fe 2p spectrum exhibited mixed Fe3+ (55%) and Fe2+ (45%). The Mn 2p spectrum revealed Mn4+ and Mn3+ at 14% and 86%, Co 2p showed Co3+ (54%) and Co2+ (46%), Ni appeared as Ni2+ (100%), and Cu appeared as Cu2+ (95%) and Cu0 (5%). For MnCoNiCuZnO x , Zn 2p showed predominantly Zn2+. Mn4+ (13%) and Mn3+ (87%), Co3+ (48%) and Co2+ (52%), Ni2+ (100%), Cu2+ (90%), and Cu0 (10%) were observed. The O 1s spectra of both catalysts showed three components: lattice oxygen (Oα, 529.4 eV), oxygen in surface vacancies (Oβ, 531.0 eV), and hydroxyl/surface-adsorbed oxygen (Oγ, 534.0 eV). , The Oβ/Oα ratio was higher in MnFeCoNiCuO x (1.1) than in MnCoNiCuZnO x (0.8), indicating a greater concentration of the surface oxygen vacancy (Ov) of the former.

Figure a exhibits the CO2-TPD profiles of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x . Both catalysts had similar CO2 desorption profiles, peaked at low- (ca. 125 °C) and medium- (ca. 180–190 °C) regions. The amounts of desorbed CO2 at low- and medium-temperatures were 121.3 and 135.7 μmol/g for MnFeCoNiCuO x and 135.8 and 143.6 μmol/g for MnCoNiCuZnO x , respectively. MnCoNiCuZnO x showed a slightly higher CO2 desorption amount (279.4 μmol/g) than that of MnFeCoNiCuO x (257.0 μmol/g).

2.

2

(a) CO2-TPD profiles of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x , (b) H2-TPR profiles of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x , and (c) CO2-TPD profiles of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and r-MnCoNiCuZnO x . Conditions: CO2-TPD was recorded in a He stream (25 mL/min) at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min; H2-TPR, 10% H2/Ar (25 mL/min) at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min.

Figure b shows the H2-TPR profiles of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x . Both catalysts exhibit multiple reduction peaks: a minor shoulder at 178 °C (Cu2+ → Cu0), followed by overlapping peaks at 340–350 °C (Ni2+ → Ni0) and 380–410 °C (Co cations reduction). , An additional shoulder at 505 °C appears only for MnFeCoNiCuO x , corresponding to Fe3+ reduction. Total H2 consumption was 10.5 mmol/g for MnFeCoNiCuO x and 9.1 mmol/g for MnCoNiCuZnO x . The 1.4 mmol/g difference is attributed to the presence of reducible Fe3+ in the former, whereas Zn2+ in the latter seemed to be unreducible below 800 °C.

3.2. Reduced MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x

Figure a,b shows representative TEM images and EDS mappings of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and r-MnCoNiCuZnO x NPs, respectively. Compared with the fresh forms, these reduced particles exhibit uneven elemental distributions, particularly in the highlighted red-boxed areas, consistent with localized exsolution sites. For r-MnFeCoNiCuO x , O and Mn were nearly undetectable in the highlighted region, while for r-MnCoNiCuZnO x , O, Mn, and Zn were nearly unseen. This implied that the reduction treatment induced the relocation of some elements. That is, during the reduction, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu can be redispersed in r-MnFeCoNiCuO x while Co, Ni, and Cu can be relocated in r-MnCoNiCuZnO x .

3.

3

TEM images and EDS elemental mapping results of (a) r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and (b) r-MnCoNiCuZnO x , (c) XPS spectra of Fe 2p, Mn 2p, Co 2p, Ni 2p, Cu 2p, and O 1s photolines of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x , and (d) XPS spectra of Zn 2p, Mn 2p, Co 2p, Ni 2p, Cu 2p, and O 1s photolines of r-MnCoNiCuZnO x .

Figure S2 displays the XRD patterns of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and r-MnCoNiCuZnO x . Both reduced catalysts exhibit a doublet near 44.0°, along with several minor diffraction peaks, suggesting the formation of Co/Ni/Cu-based alloy phases.

Figure c,d shows the XPS spectra of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and r-MnCoNiCuZnO x and Table S2 summarizes the relative surface cation compositions. The spectrum of each element was like its unreduced counterpart, with a decreased ratio of high-to-low cation/metal oxidation state. For r-MnFeCoNiCuO x , the Fe 2p spectrum exhibited Fe3+ (46%) and Fe2+ (54%). The Mn 2p spectrum showed Mn3+ (45%) and Mn2+ (55%), Co 2p showed Co3+ (28%), Co2+ (64%), and Co0 (8%), Ni showed Ni2+ (96%) and Ni0 (4%), and Cu showed Cu2+ (64%) and Cu0 (36%). For r-MnCoNiCuZnO x , the Zn 2p spectrum was nearly identical to its unreduced form, showing a characteristic Zn2+ photoline. The other cations showed compositions of Mn3+ (34%) and Mn2+ (66%), Co3+ (41%), Co2+ (40%) and Co0 (19%), Ni2+ (97%) and Ni0 (3%), and Cu2+ (65%) and Cu0 (35%).

The Oβ/Oα ratio of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x (1.7) was higher than that of r-MnCoNiCuZnO x (1.1), and both values were higher than those of the pristine forms. That is, the reduction of HEOs develops the corresponding Ov sites, and r-MnFeCoNiCuO x showed a higher relative Ov composition than that of r-MnCoNiCuZnO x .

Figure c shows the CO2-TPD profiles of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and r-MnCoNiCuZnO x . The low- and medium-temperature desorption peaks shifted from ca. 125 to 140–170 °C and from ca. 180–190 to 230–270 °C, respectively, compared to their unreduced counterparts (see Figure a). The total amount of desorbed CO2 from the low- and medium-temperature desorption peaks increased from 257.0 to 392.1 μmol/g for r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and from 279.4 to 288.1 μmol/g for r-MnCoNiCuZnO x . This corresponds to an enhancement of 135.1 μmol/g in the CO2 adsorption capacity for r-MnFeCoNiCuO x , more than an order higher than the increase observed for r-MnCoNiCuZnO x (8.7 μmol/g).

To further understand the redispersion/exsolution behaviors of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and r-MnCoNiCuZnO x , the wavelet-transformed XAS (WT-XAS) analysis of their reduced forms was conducted, shown in Figure . The WT-XAS 2D contour plots of Co, Ni, Cu, and Fe foils and ZnO were included for comparison. The WT-XAS 2D contour plot exhibits not only the interatomic distance (R space) but also backscattering amplitude (k space), allowing the identification of multiple bonds having similar bond distances. ,

4.

4

(a) Wavelet-transformed XAS (WT-XAS) of Cu, Co, Ni, and Fe K-edge spectra of r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and (b) Cu, Co, Ni, and Zn K-edge spectra of r-MnCoNiCuZnO x . The references including metallic foils of Cu, Co, Ni, Fe, and ZnO were included.

For r-MnFeCoNiCuO x , the peaks of Fe–M (R ≈2.1 Å and k ≈7.5 cm–1), Co–M (R ≈2.1 Å and k ≈7.0 cm–1), Ni–M (R ≈2.1 Å and k ≈7.2 cm–1), and Cu–M (R ≈2.2 Å and k ≈7.3 cm–1) (M = metallic Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu) were close to their respective references, i.e., Fe–Fe (R ≈2.2 Å and k ≈7.6 cm–1), Co–Co (R ≈2.1 Å and k ≈6.7 cm–1), Ni–Ni (R ≈2.2 Å and k ≈7.4 cm–1), and Cu–Cu (R ≈2.2 Å and k ≈6.8 cm–1). These slight deviations in R and k values underlined that the exsolved Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu exist in alloyed rather than pure elemental states. The same could be stated for r-MnCoNiCuZnO x besides Zn, which possessed an oxide form like the pattern of ZnO.

3.3. Activity Test

Figure a exhibits the RWGS activity test at 350–500 °C. CO2 conversions increased from 20.1% ± 3.0% to 43.5% ± 2.8% for MnFeCoNiCuO x and 13.9% ± 2.8% to 38.3% ± 2.4% for MnCoNiCuZnO x . CO dominated (>96%) in the tested temperatures. In 400 °C, CH4 (3.9% and 2.0%) was detected for MnCoNiCuZnO x and MnFeCoNiCuO x while no CH4 was detected above 450 °C for both catalysts. A close inspection can find a jump of CO2 conversion in 400 (27.4%)–450 °C (39.6%) for MnFeCoNiCuO x . Pure ZnO was tested under RWGS conditions and found inactive. Figure b shows the 100 h durability test for both catalysts at 450 °C. The conversions (MnFeCoNiCuO x = 40.0% and MnCoNiCuZnO x = 29.2%) were nearly unchanged with only CO as the detectable product.

5.

5

(a) Activity evaluation in 350–500 °C and (b) 100 h durability test for MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x at 450 °C. Reaction conditions: P = 0.1 MPa, H2/CO2 = 3, and GHSV = 40,000 mL/gcat/h.

Figure S3 presents the in situ DRIFTS results under CO2–H2 switching. In the CO2 stream, both catalysts exhibited characteristic bands at 1590 and 1300 cm–1 (Δν ≈290 cm–1), along with a minor band at 1040 cm–1, attributable to bidentate chelating carbonate (b-*CO3). , These b-*CO3 bands intensified with increasing temperature from 50 to 350 °C. Upon switching to H2 at 350 °C, the b-*CO3 bands progressively diminished over time, accompanied by the appearance of gaseous CO bands at 2176 and 2113 cm–1. Simultaneously, bands at 1540 and 1340 cm–1 with a reduced Δν of ∼200 cm–1 indicated the presence of residual b-*CO3 due to varying basicity on the catalyst surface, and the new band at 1475 cm–1 indicated the formation of surface bicarbonate (*HCO3), likely due to partial reduction of b-*CO3 in H2.

3.4. Redox Property Evaluation

To investigate exsolution behavior, in situ XAS measurements were performed on the Fe K-edge of MnFeCoNiCuO x and the Zn K-edge of MnCoNiCuZnO x during H2–CO2 switching tests (see Figure ).

6.

6

In situ XAS spectra of Fe K-edge of MnFeCoNiCuO x in (a) H2 and (b) CO2 at room temperature and 350, 450, and 500 °C and (b) Zn K-edge of MnCoNiCuZnO x at room temperature and 450 °C in (c) H2 and (d) CO2.

For MnFeCoNiCuO x under H2 at room temperature, the Fe K-edge spectrum exhibited a strong white line with an edge at 7126.1 eV. As the temperature increased to 350–450 °C, both the white line intensity and edge position decreased, shifting to 7112.1 eV. Linear combination analysis indicated a reduction in the Fe oxidation state from +2.7 to +0.2 (see Figure S4a). Upon exposure to CO2, the Fe edge showed the reverse trend: an increase in white line intensity and an upward shift in edge energy (from 7112.1 eV at room temperature to 7126.1 eV at 450 °C), with the Fe oxidation state increasing from +0.2 to +2.7 (see Figure S4b). These results demonstrate a reversible redox process of Feexsolution in H2 and redissolution in CO2characteristic of MnFeCoNiCuO x .

In contrast, at 450 °C under H2, the Zn K-edge spectrum of r-MnCoNiCuZnO x evolves to closely match that of ZnO, confirming the absence of Zn–metal bonding and demonstrating that Zn2+ remains excluded from the exsolved alloy NPs. However, upon switching to CO2 at 450 °C, the spectrum remained unchanged, indicating that Zn2+ does not reincorporate into the spinel units of MnCoNiCuZnO x . This confirms the redox-inactive nature of Zn in MnCoNiCuZnO x under the tested conditions.

Figure S2 further confirms the exsolution in H2 and redissolution in CO2 through XRD analysis. The CO2 reoxidized r-MnFeCoNiCuO x and r-MnCoNiCuZnO x exhibited similar spinel diffraction patterns to their pristine forms, albeit with reduced diffraction peak intensities.

4. Discussion

4.1. Redox-Driven Structural Dynamics

This study highlights the critical role of cation identity in dictating redox-responsive exsolution within spinel-type HEOs under RWGS conditions. By examining MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x , both successfully synthesized as single-phase, entropy-stabilized spinels containing five cationswe maintain nearly identical configurational entropy (ΔS config. = 12.4 and 12.3 J/mol/K, respectively), enabling an assessment of how the substitution of redox-active Fe3+ versus redox-inert Zn2+ alters redox dynamics and catalytic behaviors.

In situ XAS and WT-XAS analyses confirm that MnFeCoNiCuO x undergoes reversible exsolution and redissolution of Fe/Co/N/Cu NPs alloy under H2–CO2 cycles. In contrast, MnCoNiCuZnO x shows limited redox responsiveness, with Zn2+ resisting the redox transformation. A possible explanation of Zn’s redox inertness may be due to its high standard Gibbs free energy of reduction (ΔG° > 50 kJ/mol). Figure illustrates the redox dynamics of MnFeCoNiCuO x and MnCoNiCuZnO x .

7.

7

The scheme of reversible exsolution and redissolution of Fe/Co/Ni/Cu NPs alloy on MnFeCoNiCuO x and Co/Ni/Cu NPs alloy on MnCoNiCuZnO x with the change of the local coordination of Zn2+.

4.2. Surface Oxygen Vacancies and RWGS Activity

The enhanced catalytic performance of MnFeCoNiCuO x correlates with its higher surface Oν concentration, as indicated by an increased Oβ/Oα ratio and greater H2 uptake relative to MnCoNiCuZnO x . Oxygen vacancies play a role in facilitating CO2 activation, consistent with previous findings in other HEOs such as Zr0.5(NiFeCuMnCo)0.5O x and CoNiFeZnCrO x . In our system, the onset of high RWGS activity above 400 °C in MnFeCoNiCuO x is accompanied by the formation of Fe/Co/Ni/Cu alloy NPs, mirroring trends observed in La­(FeCoNiCrMn)­O3 perovskites and (CrMnFeCoNiCuZn)3O4 spinels, where exsolved NPs and elevated Oν concentrations lower light-off temperatures in CO oxidation. Furthermore, the high CO selectivity and durability of MnFeCoNiCuO x under moderate conditions underscores its industrial promise of RWGS, especially in processes coupling renewable hydrogen with CO2 to produce syngas for downstream value-added products.

Complementary CO2-TPD and in situ DRIFTS analyses further support these observations. MnFeCoNiCuO x exhibits greater CO2 adsorption capacity in the reduced state, with bidentate carbonate (b-*CO3) identified as the dominant intermediate formed via chemisorption at Oν sites. , Under H2 flow, the transient intensification and subsequent decline of b-*CO3 signals suggest a RWGS mechanism involving carbonate formation followed by hydrogenationlikely catalyzed by the exsolved Fe/Co/Ni/Cu NPs. ,

4.3. Implications for Entropy-Stabilized Catalyst Design

While configurational entropy supports phase stability in HEOs, it does not guarantee redox adaptability or catalytic regeneration. The presence of redox-flexible cations, such as Fe3+, is essential for enabling dynamic structural evolution and reversible alloy formation. In contrast, redox-inert Zn2+ dilutes active sites and is inactive in CO2 activation, consistent with previous reports of its inactivity in standalone catalytic conversion. , Thus, effective catalyst design should integrate entropy stabilization with the selection of redox-active components to tailor structural dynamics and reaction performance.

Spinel-type HEOs have proven their value in real-world catalysis, offering exceptional thermal stability, resistance to deactivation (e.g., anticoking and antisintering), and dynamic active-site behavior under harsh conditions. For example, a (CoCrFeNiAl)3O4 spinel HEO achieved over 80% H2 yield with sustained performance in ethanol steam reforming at 600 °C, likely due to the self-reorganization and reversible metal exsolution. This underlines the structural resilience and redox agility required in industrial catalysts, reinforcing the practical relevance of our entropy-stabilized, redox-tunable HEOs.

5. Conclusions

This work reveals the important role of redox-active cation selection in enabling reversible exsolution–dissolution behavior in high-entropy spinel oxides for RWGS catalysis. MnFeCoNiCuO x demonstrates dynamic redox adaptability through the reversible formation and redissolution of Fe/Co/Ni/Cu alloy NPs under H2–CO2 cyclingbehavior absent in the Zn-containing MnCoNiCuZnO x . The enhanced RWGS activity of MnFeCoNiCuO x , particularly above 400 °C, is attributed to the synergy of oxygen vacancies and exsolved Fe/Co/Ni/Cu alloy NPs. Notably, a similar configurational entropy in both systems does not guarantee redox responsiveness; rather, the presence of reducible cations is essential for catalytic regeneration. These findings offer a rational strategy for designing advanced HEOs catalysts by coupling entropy stabilization with targeted redox-active cation engineering.

Supplementary Material

am5c14624_si_001.pdf (295.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC Projects 113-2221-E-006-199-MY3, 114-2923-E-006-010-MY3, and 114-2221-E-006-034-MY3). The authors gratefully acknowledge the use of XPS (ESCA003700) and TEM (EM000800) of NSTC 114-2740-M-006-001 belonging to the Core Facility Center of NCKU.

Data will be made available on request.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.5c14624.

  • N2 isotherms and porosities; XPS-estimated relative surface cation composition; XRD patterns of MnFeCoNiCuO x , r-MnFeCoNiCuO x , and reoxidized r-MnFeCoNiCuO x ; MnCoNiCuZnO x , r-MnCoNiCuZnO x , and reoxidized r-MnCoNiCuZnO x ; in situ DRIFT analysis of a CO2–H2 switching test; and first derivatives of Fe XAS K-edge spectra of MnFeCoNiCuO x in H2 and CO2 streams (PDF)

Pei-Tung Chou: Investigation, formal analysis, and data curation. Cheng-Chia Kuo: Investigation, formal analysis, and data curation. Po-Yang Peng: Investigation, formal analysis, and data curation. Ying-Rui Lu: Investigation, formal analysis, and data curation. Chi-Liang Chen: Investigation, formal analysis, data curation, and resources. Yu-Chuan Lin: Writingoriginal draft and review and editing, supervision, project administration, methodology, funding acquisition, and conceptualization.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Rost C. M., Sachet E., Borman T., Moballegh A., Dickey E. C., Hou D., Jones J. L., Curtarolo S., Maria J.-P.. Entropy-stabilized oxides. Nat. Commun. 2015;6(1):8485. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fracchia M., Coduri M., Manzoli M., Ghigna P., Tamburini U. A.. Is configurational entropy the main stabilizing term in rock-salt Mg0.2Co0.2Ni0.2Cu0.2Zn0.2O high entropy oxide? Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):2977. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30674-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aamlid S. S., Oudah M., Rottler J., Hallas A. M.. Understanding the role of entropy in high entropy oxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(11):5991–6006. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c11608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Albedwawi S. H., AlJaberi A., Haidemenopoulos G. N., Polychronopoulou K.. High entropy oxides-exploring a paradigm of promising catalysts: A review. Mater. Des. 2021;202:109534. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109534. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang Q., Zheng Z., Gao R., Xiao X., Jiao M., Wang B., Zhou G., Cheng H.-M.. Constructing bipolar dual-active sites through high-entropy-induced electric dipole transition for decoupling oxygen redox. Adv. Mater. 2024;36(26):2401018. doi: 10.1002/adma.202401018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hooch Antink W., Lee S., Lee H. S., Shin H., Yoo T. Y., Ko W., Shim J., Na G., Sung Y.-E., Hyeon T.. High-valence metal-driven electronic modulation for boosting oxygen evolution reaction in high-entropy spinel oxide. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34(1):2309438. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202309438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tanaka H., Tan I., Uenishi M., Kimura M., Dohmae K.. Regeneration of palladium subsequent to solid solution and segregation in a perovskite catalyst: An intelligent catalyst. Top. Catal. 2001;16(1):63–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1016626713430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nishihata Y., Mizuki J., Akao T., Tanaka H., Uenishi M., Kimura M., Okamoto T., Hamada N.. Self-regeneration of a Pd-perovskite catalyst for automotive emissions control. Nature. 2002;418(6894):164–167. doi: 10.1038/nature00893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tanaka H., Taniguchi M., Uenishi M., Kajita N., Tan I., Nishihata Y., Mizuki J. I., Narita K., Kimura M., Kaneko K.. Self-regenerating Rh- and Pt-based perovskite catalysts for automotive-emissions control. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006;45(36):5998–6002. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lv H., Liu T., Zhang X., Song Y., Matsumoto H., Ta N., Zeng C., Wang G., Bao X.. Atomic-scale insight into exsolution of CoFe alloy nanoparticles in La0.4Sr0.6Co0.2Fe0.7Mo0.1O3−δ with efficient CO2 electrolysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59(37):15968–15973. doi: 10.1002/anie.202006536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lv H., Lin L., Zhang X., Song Y., Matsumoto H., Zeng C., Ta N., Liu W., Gao D., Wang G.. et al. In situ investigation of reversible exsolution/dissolution of CoFe alloy nanoparticles in a Co-doped Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6−δ cathode for CO2 electrolysis. Adv. Mater. 2020;32(6):1906193. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vert V. B., Melo F. V., Navarrete L., Serra J. M.. Redox stability and electrochemical study of nickel doped chromites as anodes for H2/CH4-fueled solid oxide fuel cells. Appl. Catal., B. 2012;115–116:346–356. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hou S., Ma X., Shu Y., Bao J., Zhang Q., Chen M., Zhang P., Dai S.. Self-regeneration of supported transition metals by a high entropy-driven principle. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):5917. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26160-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carrillo A. J., López-García A., Delgado-Galicia B., Serra J. M.. New trends in nanoparticle exsolution. Chem. Commun. 2024;60(62):7987–8007. doi: 10.1039/D4CC01983K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miracle D. B., Senkov O. N.. A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater. 2017;122:448–511. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhao J., Bao J., Yang S., Niu Q., Xie R., Zhang Q., Chen M., Zhang P., Dai S.. Exsolution–dissolution of supported metals on high-entropy Co3MnNiCuZnOx: Toward sintering-resistant catalysis. ACS Catal. 2021;11(19):12247–12257. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c03228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shao Y., Wu C., Xi S., Tan P., Wu X., Saqline S., Liu W.. Halite-structured (MgCoNiMnFe)­Ox high entropy oxide (HEO) for chemical looping dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal., B. 2024;355:124191. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo C., Cui Y., Zhang W., Du X., Peng X., Yu Y., Li J., Wu Y., Huang Y., Kong T.. et al. Light-driven metal exsolution-redissolution of high-entropy oxide enabling high-performance dry reforming of methane. Adv. Mater. 2025;37(21):2500928. doi: 10.1002/adma.202500928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu F., Wei B., He B., Yu X., Zhao S., Chen Y., Wang W., Zhao L., Chen Q.. Recent advances and future prospects in exsolution technology for solid oxide cells. Energy Rev. 2025;4(3):100141. doi: 10.1016/j.enrev.2025.100141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ravel B., Newville M.. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2005;12(4):537–541. doi: 10.1107/S0909049505012719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin Y.-C., Rajagopal S., Chou P.-T., Peng P.-Y., Lu Y.-R., Chen C.-L., Tsai M.-H., Wang C.-H.. Crafting a methanation-resistant, reverse water–gas shift-active nickel catalyst with significant nanoparticle dimensions using the molten salt approach. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2024;12(40):14771–14783. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Prameswari J., Chou P.-T., Hung M.-Y., Peng P.-Y., Lu Y.-R., Chen C.-L., Tian H.-K., Lin Y.-C.. Boosted reverse water-gas shift activity via exsolved Cu and Ni in silicalite-1. Chem. Commun. 2024;60(96):14244–14247. doi: 10.1039/D4CC04964K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. George E. P., Raabe D., Ritchie R. O.. High-entropy alloys. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019;4(8):515–534. doi: 10.1038/s41578-019-0121-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shulman G. R., Yafet Y., Eisenberger P., Blumberg W. E.. Observations and interpretation of x-ray absorption edges in iron compounds and proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1976;73(5):1384–1388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.5.1384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pu Y., Moseley D., He Z., Pitike K. C., Manley M. E., Yan J., Cooper V. R., Mitchell V., Peterson V. K., Johannessen B.. et al. (Mg,Mn,Fe,Co,Ni)­O: A rocksalt high-entropy oxide containing divalent Mn and Fe. Sci. Adv. 2023;9(38):eadi8809. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi8809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhao Q., Yan Z., Chen C., Chen J.. Spinels: controlled preparation, oxygen reduction/evolution reaction application, and beyond. Chem. Rev. 2017;117(15):10121–10211. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mo Y., Tian Z., Hu K., Ren W., Lu X., Duan X., Wang S.. Metal- and site-specific roles of high-entropy spinel oxides in catalytic oxidative polymerization of water contaminants. ACS Catal. 2025;15(8):5928–5942. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c00854. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nakashima S., Fujita K., Tanaka K., Hirao K., Yamamoto T., Tanaka I.. First-principles XANES simulations of spinel zinc ferrite with a disordered cation distribution. Phys. Rev. B. 2007;75(17):174443. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.174443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hamilton J. G., Farrell R. E., Chen N., Feng R., Reid J., Peak D.. Characterizing zinc speciation in soils from a smelter-affected boreal forest ecosystem. J. Environ. Qual. 2016;45(2):684–692. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.03.0145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gu K., Wang D., Xie C., Wang T., Huang G., Liu Y., Zou Y., Tao L., Wang S.. Defect-rich high-entropy oxide nanosheets for efficient 5-hydroxymethylfurfural electrooxidation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60(37):20253–20258. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang M., Duan X., Gao Y., Zhang S., Lu X., Luo K., Ye J., Wang X., Niu Q., Zhang P.. et al. Tuning oxygen vacancies in oxides by configurational entropy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15(39):45774–45789. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c07268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Echegoyen Y., Suelves I., Lázaro M. J., Moliner R., Palacios J. M.. Hydrogen production by thermocatalytic decomposition of methane over Ni-Al and Ni-Cu-Al catalysts: Effect of calcination temperature. J. Power Sources. 2007;169(1):150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.01.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Borg Ø., Eri S., Blekkan E. A., Storsæter S., Wigum H., Rytter E., Holmen A.. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over γ-alumina-supported cobalt catalysts: Effect of support variables. J. Catal. 2007;248(1):89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bhagade S. S., Chaurasia S. R., Bhanage B. M.. Reductive-hydroformylation of 1-octene to nonanol using fibrous Co3O4 catalyst. Catal. Today. 2018;309:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.08.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li A., Meng L., Yuan Z., Zhang X.. Research on microstructures and properties of CoNiCr and CoNiCu medium-entropy alloys. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2021;2044(1):012063. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2044/1/012063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Filez M., Redekop E. A., Poelman H., Galvita V. V., Ramachandran R. K., Dendooven J., Detavernier C., Marin G. B.. Unravelling the formation of Pt–Ga alloyed nanoparticles on calcined Ga-modified hydrotalcites by in situ XAS. Chem. Mater. 2014;26(20):5936–5949. doi: 10.1021/cm502658d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Timoshenko J., Kuzmin A.. Wavelet data analysis of EXAFS spectra. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2009;180(6):920–925. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.12.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhao J., Wang Z., Fang X., Yang L., Wu C., Gan W., Zhou Y., Shan L., Lin Y.. Fast joule heating synthesis of NiCoFeCrMo high-entropy alloy embedded in graphene for water oxidation. J. Alloys Compd. 2023;966:171535. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Coenen K., Gallucci F., Mezari B., Hensen E., van Sint Annaland M.. An in-situ IR study on the adsorption of CO2 and H2O on hydrotalcites. J. CO2 Util. 2018;24:228–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Onrubia-Calvo J. A., López-Rodríguez S., Villar-García I. J., Pérez-Dieste V., Bueno-López A., González-Velasco J. R.. Molecular elucidation of CO2 methanation over a highly active, selective and stable LaNiO3/CeO2-derived catalyst by in situ FTIR and NAP-XPS. Appl. Catal., B. 2024;342:123367. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jones, A. Tempature-programmed Reduction for Solid Materials Characterization; CRC Press, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen D., Nie S., Wu L., Zheng X., Du S., Duan X., Niu Q., Zhang P., Dai S.. Metal–Tannin coordination assembly route to nanostructured high-entropy oxide perovskites with abundant defects. Chem. Mater. 2022;34(4):1746–1755. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03930. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Swindell J. D., Tainton G. R. M., Chansai S., Hazeldine K., Buckingham M. A., Walton A. S., Hardacre C., Haigh S. J., Lewis D. J.. Improving CO oxidation catalysis over high entropy spinels by increasing disorder. Adv. Sci. 2025;12(15):2413424. doi: 10.1002/advs.202413424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jung K. T., Bell A. T.. An in situ infrared study of dimethyl carbonate synthesis from carbon dioxide and methanol over zirconia. J. Catal. 2001;204(2):339–347. doi: 10.1006/jcat.2001.3411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu B., Li C. M., Wang X. Y., Li Z.. Oxygen vacancy modulation in CeO2: synergistic effects of zirconium doping and morphological control for promoting dimethyl carbonate synthesis from CO2 and methanol. New J. Chem. 2025;49(27):11796–11809. doi: 10.1039/D5NJ01120E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Xiao Z., Zhang C., Gu J., Yuan E., Li G., Zou J.-J., Wang D.. Designing Ni-In intermetallic alloy compounds for high activity and selectivity in low-temperature RWGS reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2025;507:160529. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.160529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chinchen G. C., Waugh K. C., Whan D. A.. The activity and state of the copper surface in methanol synthesis catalysts. Appl. Catal. 1986;25(1):101–107. doi: 10.1016/S0166-9834(00)81226-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nie X., Ren X., Tu C., Song C., Guo X., Chen J. G.. Computational and experimental identification of strong synergy of the Fe/ZnO catalyst in promoting acetic acid synthesis from CH4 and CO2 . Chem. Commun. 2020;56(28):3983–3986. doi: 10.1039/C9CC10055E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang C., Liu W., Liao M., Weng J., Shen J., Chen Y., Du Y.. Novel nano spinel-type high-entropy oxide (HEO) catalyst for hydrogen production using ethanol steam reforming. Nanoscale. 2023;15(19):8619–8632. doi: 10.1039/D2NR07195A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

am5c14624_si_001.pdf (295.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES