Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Sep 9;147(37):33914–33922. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c10891

Harnessing Dynamic Heteroleptic Complexation for Self-Assembly of Robust Nested Metallo-Supramolecular Cages

Soumyakanta Prusty , Hung-Kai Hsu , Mahesh Madasu , Alisha Rani , Jun-Hao Fu , Lin-Ting Lin , Ming-Hao Lee , Ming-Wen Chu , Chun-Hong Kuo §, Yi-Tsu Chan †,*
PMCID: PMC12447513  PMID: 40923411

Abstract

The exclusive formation of artificial multicomponent assemblies remains a significant challenge, in contrast to the well-established organization observed in natural systems, due to intrinsic entropic constraints. To overcome this limitation, recent efforts have been focused on developing precision self-assembly strategies for the rational construction of such architectures. Here, we construct an ideal complementary pair of 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine (tpy)-based ligands by fine-tuning the substituent bulkiness, which enables the quantitative formation of robust nested cages through efficient dynamic heteroleptic complexation with multivalent coordination. The multivalent ligand design proves essential for successful self-assembly, as the smaller incarcerated cage cannot be independently synthesized in an exclusive manner. Notably, the improved solubility and exceptional stability of the nested cage even at low concentrations allow for structural characterization by high-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, solution-based small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Moreover, its well-defined internal cavity permits the in situ reductive formation of gold nanoparticles, demonstrating its potential as a functional nanoreactor.


graphic file with name ja5c10891_0007.jpg


graphic file with name ja5c10891_0006.jpg

Introduction

Nested architectures are a fundamental feature of many natural systems, where precise spatial organization enables distinct biological and mechanical functions. For instance, viral capsids efficiently encapsulate genetic materials, multilamellar lipid vesicles , provide compartmentalization for cellular processes, and biomineralized skeletons , exhibit hierarchical strength and resilience. These examples illustrate the critical interplay between structure and function, achieved through precise molecular self-assembly. Inspired by this natural sophistication, chemists have sought to mimic such hierarchical architectures in artificial systems, aiming to create functional nanomaterials for catalysis, , drug delivery, molecular sensing, , etc. Among these artificial systems, nested cage structures generated from pillared architecture design, entwined ligand coordination, , π-π interactions, , metal nanoclusters, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) , are particularly intriguing, characterized by multiple internal cavities within double-shell scaffolds. These structures echo the complexity of natural systems, where nested compartments optimize spatial efficiency and functional diversity. Nevertheless, the rational design and controlled synthesis of such multicomponent architectures remain formidable challenges, often hindered by undesired competing reactions and the intrinsic difficulty of achieving precise spatial control at the molecular level.

To address these challenges, metal–ligand coordination-driven self-assembly has emerged as a powerful approach for constructing complex supramolecular systems. Among various strategies, dynamic heteroleptic complexation , offers high structural precision and modularity, making it particularly suited for multicomponent assemblies. For instance, phenanthroline-based heteroleptic complexes have been utilized in preparation of mechanically interlocked molecules , and molecular machines. Our group has previously demonstrated that 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine (tpy)-based complementary ligand pairs can be utilized to construct heteroleptic polygons, , polyhedrons, and copolymers in one-pot reactions. This approach, when combined with multivalent ligand design, enables the quantitative formation of ring-in-ring structures and multicompartment cages, mimicking the selective and cooperative binding observed in biological systems. However, as the number of building blocks increases, nonlabile homoleptic complexation can significantly impede the formation of more intricate architectures, highlighting the need for more precise and delicate ligand design.

In this study, we present a second-generation tpy-based complementary ligand pair, specifically engineered to fully suppress irreversible homoleptic complexation through the strategic incorporation of bulky 6,6″-terpyridyl substituents. This design drives the exclusive formation of heteroleptic complexes with CdII ions under ambient conditions and, in combination with multivalent coordination, enables the self-assembly of a nested molecular cage featuring an inner octahedron encapsulated by an outer truncated tetrahedron. The resulting bilayered architecture, bridged by 12 octamethylenedioxy chains, exhibits excellent solubility and remarkable stability even at low concentrations, facilitating detailed structural characterization by high-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Moreover, the well-defined internal cavity provides a confined environment for the in situ reductive formation of gold nanoparticles, implying its potential as a functional nanoreactor.

Results and Discussion

Investigation of Substituent Effects on Complementary Ligand Pairing

Our previous studies ,− ,, have demonstrated that tpy-based complementary ligand pairing can be applied to the quantitative preparation of various well-defined heteroleptic metallo-supramolecules. In stoichiometric complexation with metal ions, the formation of heteroleptic complexes is driven by additional ion-dipole interactions and π-stacking stabilization, primarily due to the presence of 2,6-dimethoxyphenyl substituents. However, when 6,6″-di­(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-substituted tpy ligands, such as L a (Figure a), are used at a ligand-to-metal molar ratio of 2:1, homoleptic complexes can be still formed (Figures S21–S23). To completely eliminate such undesired nonlabile homoleptic complexes in a multicomponent self-assembly system, the influence of the 6,6″-terpyridyl substituent on the dynamic heteroleptic complexation was carefully investigated. It was assumed that a bulkier group than 2,6-dimethoxyphenyl could prevent homodimer formation entirely. To verify this assumption, the 2,6-diisopropoxyphenyl group was chosen as a substituent for the following reasons: (1) the increased steric hindrance would further decelerate homodimer formation; (2) metal centers could still engage in ancillary ion-dipole interactions with the isopropoxy units; and (3) the bulkier group would enhance the solubility of the resultant complex. Hence, ligand L b (Figure a) was synthesized via the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction between 2,6-diisopropoxyphenylboronic acid and 2-acetyl-6-bromopyridine, followed by a modified Kröhnke reaction with p-anisaldehyde (Scheme S1). As expected, upon treatment of L b with 0.5 equiv of CdII ions, no homoleptic complex [CdL b 2] was formed. Instead, the reaction yielded [CdL b ] along with uncoordinated L b , even after heating at 80 °C for 3 days (Figures S27 and S28).

1.

1

Chemical modification of complementary ligand pairs toward ideal heteroleptic complexation. (a) Schematic representation of distinct homoleptic complexation behaviors for ligands L a and L b in the presence of CdII ions. (b) Spontaneous formation of the heteroleptic complex [CdL c L d ] under ambient conditions. (c) X-ray crystal structure of [CdL c L d ]. Hydrogen atoms, PF6 ions, and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity. (d) 1H NMR spectra of L c , [CdL c L d ], and L d . (e) ESI-MS spectrum of [CdL c L d ] and isotope patterns of [M – 2PF6]2+.

For testing the heteroleptic complexation, the bromo-substituted ligand L c was chosen over the methoxy-substituted ligand L b to avoid potential overlapping of the 1H NMR signals between the methoxy units of L b and L d . Ligand L c was synthesized using a procedure similar to that of L b , while ligand L d was prepared following a literature protocol. A mixture of L c , L d , and CdII in a 1:1:1 ratio resulted in the quantitative formation of the heteroleptic complex [CdL c L d ] under ambient conditions (Figure b). The 1H NMR spectrum of the complex displayed three sharp singlets at δ = 8.96 (3′,5′-tpyHs of L c ), 8.33 (3′,5′-tpyHs of L d ), and 3.99 (OCH 3 of L d ) ppm, along with a septet at δ = 3.70 (−CH- of isopropoxy group of L c ) ppm, which are indicative of heteroleptic complex formation (Figure d). The presence of two doublets assigned to the −CH 3 groups of the isopropoxy moieties was attributed to the restricted rotation of the C–O bonds after heteroleptic complexation, creating two distinct chemical environments. Complete assignments of the 1H NMR spectrum for [CdL c L d ] were made with the assistance of COSY and ROESY spectral data (Figures S31–S34). Formation of [CdL c L d ] was further confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), which revealed two peaks at m/z = 1369.4740 and 612.1437 corresponding to [M – PF6]+ and [M – 2PF6]2+, respectively (Figure e). The structure of [CdL c L d ] was conclusively validated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Single crystals suitable for X-ray data collection were obtained via vapor diffusion of diethyl ether into an MeCN solution of the complex. The complex crystallized in a monoclinic system with the space group P2 1 /c. X-ray crystallographic analysis (Figure c) revealed that the CdII center is situated in a pseudo-octahedral geometry. π-Stacking interactions between the two 2,6-diisopropoxyphenyl rings and the central pyridine unit of L d provide extra stability for the heteroleptic structure compared to homoleptic [CdL d 2]. Moreover, the formation constant (1.44 ± 0.27 × 1015 M–2) for [CdL b L d ]­(NTf2)2 in MeCN was determined by isothermal titration calorimetry (Figure S37), demonstrating that the heteroleptic complex possesses significant thermodynamic stability.

Self-Assembly of Heteroleptic Cages

The stepwise construction of a metallo-octahedron has been demonstrated using C 3-symmetrical tris-tpy and 60°-bent V-shaped bis-tpy ligands in combination with RuII and CdII ions. To develop a more efficient synthetic approach, the one-pot self-assembly of such an octahedral cage utilizing the aforementioned complementary ligand pair was explored. For this purpose, tris-tpy F 1 and bis-tpy L e were designed and synthesized (Figure a and Scheme S1). A mixture of F 1 , L e , and Cd­(NO3)2·4H2O in a stoichiometric ratio of 2:3:6 was stirred at 25 °C for 30 min, after which excess NH4PF6 was added to convert the counteranions from NO3 to PF6 . The counterion-exchanged product was redissolved in MeCN, and the solution was stirred at 80 °C for 24 h. ESI-MS analysis of the final complex suggested the formation of the target cage [Cd12 F 1 4 L e 6], along with other assemblies, including [Cd18 F 1 6 L e 9] and [Cd6 F 1 2 L e 3]. 1H and DOSY NMR spectra (Figures S38, S42, and S43), recorded at different concentrations, revealed a concentration-dependent assembly behavior. , At higher concentrations, the larger assembly [Cd18 F 1 6 L e 9] was generated, whereas at lower concentrations, the smaller assembly, [Cd6 F 1 2 L e 3] was observed. In both cases, [Cd12 F 1 4 L e 6] was also present. The 1H NMR signals corresponding to [Cd6n F 1 2n L e 3n] (n = 1–3) were carefully assigned based on 2D COSY and ROESY experiments (Figures S39–S41). Furthermore, ESI-MS analysis performed at varying concentrations (Figure S44) corroborated the NMR observations. Despite the inherent structural flexibility of L e , the failure to exclusively form the expected octahedron likely arose from its bend angle deviating from the ideal dihedral angle of 70.5° at a vertex.

2.

2

Self-assembly and molecular models of the metallo-supramolecular cages. (a) Ligand combinations for self-assembly of [Cd6n F 1 2n L e 3n] (n = 1–3), [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6], and [Cd30 F2 8 V 6]. Geometry-optimized structures and dimensions of (b) [Cd12 F 1 4 L e 6] and (c) [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6].

Self-Assembly of Nested Cages

Multivalency and cooperativity are recognized as critical factors in both natural and artificial self-assembly processes, facilitating the construction of complex yet well-defined structures. Based on this principle, it was hypothesized that the exclusive formation of a three-dimensional cage could be achievable through the rational design of multivalent ligands. To test this hypothesis, the multivalent ligand V was selected as a replacement for the bis-tpy ligand (L e ). Ligand V, consisting of two 120°-bent bis-tpy units linked to a central 60°-bent bis-tpy through octamethylenedioxy spacers (Figure a), was synthesized following a previously reported procedure. Notably, V is capable of undergoing intramolecular homoleptic complexation with CdII ions, leading to the formation of a tetratopic metalloligand with two pairs of parallel coordinative tpy sites. This specific structural arrangement serves as the key design element for the creation of a nested metallo-supramolecular cage, which comprises an external truncated tetrahedron encapsulating an internal octahedron (Figure a). Accordingly, a stoichiometric mixture of F 1 , V, and Cd­(NO3)2·4H2O in a molar ratio of 4:3:15 was stirred at ambient temperature for 30 min in CHCl3/MeOH (1/1, v/v). Excess NH4PF6 was then added to exchange the counteranions. After heating the resultant complex in CD3CN at 80 °C for 2 days, the 1H NMR spectrum (800 MHz) revealed sharp and well-resovled peaks with five distinct sets of terpyridyl signals, providing preliminary evidence for the formation of the target structure, [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6] (Figure a). It is noteworthy that under identical reaction conditions, the 6,6″-di­(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-substituted tris-tpy ligand yielded insoluble precipitates, suggesting that the isopropoxy groups in F 1 significantly enhanced solubility during the self-assembly process. The DOSY NMR experiment (Figure b) confirmed the prencence of a single species with a diffusion coefficient of 1.50 × 10–10 m2 s–1 in CD3CN. All the 1H NMR signals from the complex were carefully assigned using COSY and ROESY experiments (Figures S46–S55). The complex was found to be stable across a range of concentrations (1–32 mg mL–1 in CD3CN), as observed by 1H NMR (Figure S56). Furthermore, the 113Cd NMR spectrum of the complex (Figure c) showed three sharp peaks, which were in accord with the molecular symmetry of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6]. When compared to [CdL d 2] and [CdL c L d ] (Figure S36), the resonance at δ = 266.97 ppm was assigned to the homoleptic CdII center, while the signals at δ = 239.38 and 236.96 ppm were attributed to the heteroleptic CdII nuclei.

3.

3

Structural characterization of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6]. (a) 1H (800 MHz), (b) DOSY (500 MHz), and (c) 113Cd (500 MHz) NMR spectra in CD3CN at 25 °C. (d) ESI-MS spectrum and (e) TWIM-MS plot.

Finally, ESI-MS analysis confirmed the chemical composition of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6], which has a molecular weight of 44,451 Da, revealing major peaks corresponding to gas-phase ions with charge states ranging from 17+ to 39+ (Figure d). To gain further structural insights into the nested architecture, electrospray ionization coupled with traveling wave ion-mobility mass spectrometry (ESI-TWIM-MS) was employed. The average experimental collision cross-section (4214.3 ± 110.6 Å2), deduced from the drift times, closely matched the theoretical value (4192.2 ± 144.9 Å2) obtained from annealing simulation and trajectory calculations (Table S2). The absence of other isomers was supported by the narrow drift time distributions observed for the 24+ to 39+ species in the ESI-TWIM-MS plot (Figure e).

Experiments to Evaluate Molecular Stability

To assess kinetic stability of the ligand exchange process between cages, the isostructural cage [Cd30 F 2 8 V 6] (Figure a) was constructed using the tritopic ligand F 2 , which contains three additional methoxy groups compared to F 1 . This modification allowed for a clear distinction in molecular weight between [Cd30 F 2 8 V 6] and [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6], enabling accurate monitoring of the ligand exchange process. The newly constructed cage was thoroughly characterized using NMR and ESI-MS (Figures S58–S63) to confirm its structure and composition. The difference in molecular weight between the two cages was utilized to measure the ligand exchange rate via ESI-MS analysis (Figures S64–S66). Experimental results indicated that the half-life for the ligand exchange process between two cages was a markedly prolonged half-life, estimated to exceed 7.5 months at 25 °C. This exceptional stability contrasts sharply with the substantially shorter half-life of 34 s observed for the mononuclear heteroleptic complex [CdL c L d ], as determined by 1H exchange spectroscopy (EXSY) NMR experiments (Figure S67). The dramatic difference in half-lives illustrates the enhanced kinetic stability of the multicomponent supramolecular cages, which is presumably attributed to the intricate multivalent interactions within the cage architecture.

Structure Characterization by Microscopy and X-ray Scattering

Various microscopy techniques were employed to visualize these well-defined nanoobjects and gain deeper structural insights. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the cage (Figure S68) displayed two major average heights of 8.5 ± 0.4 nm and 5.9 ± 0.4 nm, which could be ascribed to different orientations of the molecules on the surface, as suggested by the molecular modeling (Figure c). Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6] was conducted in MeCN/H2O (1/4, v/v) at a concentration of 3 × 10–6 M. The corresponding cryo-EM micrograph (Figure a) exhibited chain-like aggregates composed of individual molecules with an average size of 7.5 ± 0.8 nm. This aggregation was presumably induced by the ionic nature of metal complexes. Notably, when the solvent composition was adjusted to a more MeCN-rich mixture (MeCN/H2O = 3/1, v/v), dissociated single molecules were observed (Figure b) possibly because of improved solubility in MeCN. To further visualize single molecules, scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) was utilized. High-resolution high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF)-STEM images (Figures c–e and S69) clearly revealed both the dimeric aggreagtion and the single-molecule framework of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6], closely resembling the corresponding geometry-optimized CPK models (Figure f). Although soft materials are typically vulnerable to high-voltage electron beams, the significant robustness of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6] allowed for the acquisition of single-molecule images even under such harsh conditions.

4.

4

Electron microscopy and SAXS analysis of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6]. (a, b) Cryo-EM images. (c–e) HAADF-STEM images with the corresponding possible geometry-optimized CPK models shown at the bottom right of each panel. Image c depicts the aggregation of two nested cages. (f) Geometry-optimized CPK model of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6] showing structural resemblance to the features observed in image e. (g) SAXS profiles derived from the experiments (pink dot) and the bead model (black line). The error bars represent the uncertainties in the scattering intensity. The inset is the Guinier plot obtained from the experimental data (green circle) at qR g < 1.3 and the fitted linear regression curve (red line). (h) Pair distance distribution function generated from the experimental SAXS data. (i) Superposed image of the simulated bead model (pink) and the geometry-optimized structure (light blue). The overlapped part is shown in purple.

The morphological features of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6] in MeCN was further examined under dilute conditions using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The nanoscopic shape and size of the cage were evaluated by fitting the experimental SAXS profile to a specific topological model. The linearity of the Guinier plot in the range of qR g < 1.3 consistently indicated the presence of a monodisperse solution of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6] (Figure g). The corresponding radius of gyration (R g), derived from the Guinier approximation, was estimated to be 29.26 ± 0.14 Å, which was in good agreement with the simulated value of 29.41 ± 0.53 Å deduced from the energy-minimized structures after annealing. In addition, the experimental pair distance distribution function (PDDF), P(r) (Figure h), obtained through indirect Fourier transformation of the SAXS data, revealed the maximum particle distance (D max) of 8.8 nm, which closely aligned with the theoretical dimensions of [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6]. The primary peak and shoulder features observed in the P(r) curve were consistent with the spatial arrangement of the homoleptic metal center relative to the metal nodes in the inner and outer cages, as illustrated in the 2D-unfolded structural diagram (Figure S74). The structural consistency between experimental and theoretical analyses was further confirmed by superposing the bead model derived from the SAXS profile with the geometry-optimized structure (Figure i).

Synthesis of Cage-Encapsulated Gold Nanoparticles (Au@Cage)

The void spaces of the nested cage were analyzed using MoloVol, and the computaional results indicated the presence of two distinct cavities with the respective volumes of 3,280 ± 94 and 14,847 Å3. The central cavity, formed by the internal octahedron, is surrounded by four smaller void spaces, which originate from the bilayered compartments (Figures h and S70 and Video S1). Building on the unique cavities and robustness of the cage framework, it was hypothesized that the in situ reduction of tetrachloroaurate ions (AuCl4 ) within the cationic scaffold might lead to the formation of cage-encapsulated gold nanoparticles (Au@Cage). To verify this hypothesis, a mixture of HAuCl4·3H2O and [Cd30 F 1 8 V 6] in MeCN was treated with NaBH4, resulting in a color change to red without producing any precipitates, indicating the reduction of gold­(III) to gold(0). TEM images (Figure a,b) confirmed the formation of Au nanoparticles with an average diameter of 2.8 ± 0.4 nm (Figure d), which were randomly embedded in the cage matrix, exhibiting a darker contrast than the grid carbon film, as further evidenced by dark-field imaging (Figure e). The observed Au nanoparticle size, approximately 12,000 Å3, closely matched the calculated central cavity volume, strongly supporting that nanoparticle growth was confined within the cage. The high-resolution TEM image (Figure c) revealed a lattice interlayer distance of 0.24 nm, corresponding to the d-spacing of the (111) plane of Au. Furthermore, the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum (Figure S71) displayed Au 4f7/2 and Au 4f5/2 peaks with binding energies at 82.8 and 86.6 eV, respectively, confirming the presence of reduced gold(0). Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis revealed the spatial distributions of Au and Cd (Figure f), as well as C, N, and O (Figure g), in the obtained Au@Cage, again suggesting that the Au nanoparticles were encapsulated in the cage framework.

5.

5

TEM and EDS analyses of Au@Cage. (a-c) TEM images and (d) particle size distribution histogram. (e) Dark-field TEM image and (f, g) EDS elemental maps overlaid on image e, illustrating the spatial distributions of Au and Cd in image f, and C, N, and O in image g, respectively. (d) Computed central cavity of the cage, shown in purple, as generated using MoloVol.

To further investigate the role of cage cavity in the synthesis of Au nanoparticles, the flat metallomacrocycle (FM) [Cd9 V 3] was utilized as a control. Accordingly, Au@FM and pure Au nanoparticles were synthesized using [Cd9 V 3] and in the absence of metal complexes, respectively, following the same protocol used for the preparation of Au@Cage. The TEM images of Au@FM and Au nanoparticles revealed significantly larger average sizes of 7.7 ± 2.2 and 13.6 ± 2.7 nm, respectively, with broader size distributions (Figures S72 and S73). These observations suggest that the confined space and cationic framework of the cage played a crucial role in facilitating the formation of uniform cage-encapsulated Au nanoparticles.

Conclusions

In summary, the nested metallo-supramolecular cages were successfully self-assembled through the deliberate combination of efficient dynamic heteroleptic complexation and rational multivalent ligand design. Undesired homoleptic complexation pathways, often detrimental to the selectivity and fidelity of self-assembly, were effectively suppressed by strategic control over ligand substituent bulkiness. This molecular-level control also improved solubility, thereby maintaining solution-phase homogeneity during the self-assembly process–a critical factor for ensuring structural uniformity. Kinetic studies revealed remarkable solution stability of the nested cages, with a ligand exchange half-life of >7.5 months. These characteristics enabled comprehensive structural elucidation via high-field NMR, solution-based SAXS, cryo-EM, and HAADF-STEM single-molecule imaging. Furthermore, the well-defined internal cavity of the multicompartment architecture was employed as a confined nanoreactor for the in situ reductive formation of uniform cage-encapsulated gold nanoparticles, whose electrochemical catalytic properties are currently under investigation. This study demonstrated a versatile and generalizable approach for constructing hierarchically organized multicomponent metallo-supramolecular architectures, offering a powerful platform for the bottom-up design of functional materials with programmable structures, enhanced stability, and potential applications in nanoreactors, catalysis, and molecular devices.

Supplementary Material

ja5c10891_si_001.pdf (16MB, pdf)
Download video file (35MB, mp4)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of Taiwan (NSTC 113-2628-M-002-004 and 113-2639-M-002-009-ASP). The authors acknowledge the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC), Taiwan, for support with the SAXS measurements, the Key Consortium of Electron Microscopy at National Taiwan University for the STEM technical services, and the Academia Sinica Cryo-EM Facility (ASCEM) for assistance with cryo-EM experiments.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.5c10891.

  • Video S1: energy-minimized model and MoloVol cavity size analysis of [Cd30 F1 8 V 6] (MP4)

  • Detailed experimental procedures, synthesis, ligand exchange studies, characterization data (NMR, MS, ITC, SAXS, AFM, STEM), and X-ray crystallographic information (PDF)

‡.

S.P. and H.-K.H. contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Dai X., Zhou Z. H.. Structure of the herpes simplex virus 1 capsid with associated tegument protein complexes. Science. 2018;360:eeao7298. doi: 10.1126/science.aao7298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bangham A. D., Horne R. W.. Negative staining of phospholipids and their structural modification by surface-active agents as observed in the electron microscope. J. Mol. Biol. 1964;8:660–668. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(64)80115-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Saadeldin I. M., Ehab S., Cho J.. Relevance of multilamellar and multicompartmental vesicles in biological fluids: understanding the significance of proportional variations and disease correlation. Biomark. Res. 2023;11:77. doi: 10.1186/s40364-023-00518-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Thompson, D. A. W. On Growth and Form; Cambridge University Press: United Kingdom, 1917. [Google Scholar]
  5. Afanasieva M. S.. Radiolarian skeletons: Formation and morphology of skeletal shells. Paleontol. J. 2006;40:476–489. doi: 10.1134/S0031030106050029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown C. J., Toste F. D., Bergman R. G., Raymond K. N.. Supramolecular Catalysis in Metal-Ligand Cluster Hosts. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:3012–3035. doi: 10.1021/cr4001226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiao Y., Chen X.-Y., Stoddart J. F.. Weak bonding strategies for achieving regio- and site-selective transformations. Chem. 2022;8:414–438. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.12.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ahmad N., Younus H. A., Chughtai A. H., Verpoort F.. Metal-organic molecular cages: applications of biochemical implications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:9–25. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00222A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Percástegui E. G., Ronson T. K., Nitschke J. R.. Design and Applications of Water-Soluble Coordination Cages. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:13480–13544. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guimarães D., Cavaco-Paulo A., Nogueira E.. Design of liposomes as drug delivery system for therapeutic applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2021;601:120571. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brzechwa-Chodzyńska A., Drożdż W., Harrowfield J., Stefankiewicz A. R.. Fluorescent sensors: A bright future for cages. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021;434:213820. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213820. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. La Cognata S., Amendola V.. Recent applications of organic cages in sensing and separation processes in solution. Chem. Commun. 2023;59:13668–13678. doi: 10.1039/D3CC04522F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sun Q.-F., Murase T., Sato S., Fujita M.. A sphere-in-sphere complex by orthogonal self-assembly. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011;50:10318–10321. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bhat I. A., Samanta D., Mukherjee P. S.. A Pd24 Pregnant Molecular Nanoball: Self-Templated Stellation by Precise Mapping of Coordination Sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:9497–9502. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b06628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun B., Wang M., Lou Z., Huang M., Xu C., Li X., Chen L.-J., Yu Y., Davis G. L., Xu B., Yang H.-B., Li X.. From ring-in-ring to sphere-in-sphere: Self-assembly of discrete 2D and 3D architectures with increasing stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:1556–1564. doi: 10.1021/ja511443p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu D., Li K., Chen M., Zhang T., Li Z., Yin J.-F., He L., Wang J., Yin P., Chan Y.-T., Wang P.. Russian-Doll-Like Molecular Cubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:2537–2544. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c11703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang H., Zhou L. P., Zheng Y., Wang K., Song B., Yan X., Wojtas L., Wang X. Q., Jiang X., Wang M., Sun Q. F., Xu B., Yang H. B., Sue A. C. H., Chan Y. T., Sessler J. L., Jiao Y., Stang P. J., Li X.. Double-Layered Supramolecular Prisms Self-Assembled by Geometrically Non-equivalent Tetratopic Subunits. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:1298–1305. doi: 10.1002/anie.202010805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. He L., Hsu H.-K., Li L., Lin L.-T., Tu T.-H., Ong T.-G., Liou G.-G., Chan Y.-T.. A 10-nm-sized multicompartment cuboctahedron and its 2D hierarchical arrays observed by cryo-EM. Chem. 2022;8:494–507. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tamura Y., Takezawa H., Fujita M.. A Double-Walled Knotted Cage for Guest-Adaptive Molecular Recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:5504–5508. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c00459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhu C., Tang H., Yang K., Fang Y., Wang K.-Y., Xiao Z., Wu X., Li Y., Powell J. A., Zhou H.-C.. Homochiral Dodecanuclear Lanthanide “Cage in Cage” for Enantioselective Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:12560–12566. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gan H., Xu N., Qin C., Sun C., Wang X., Su Z.. Equi-size nesting of Platonic and Archimedean metal-organic polyhedra into a twin capsid. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4103. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17989-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tang M., Liang Y., Lu X., Miao X., Jiang L., Liu J., Bian L., Wang S., Wu L., Liu Z.. Molecular-strain engineering of double-walled tetrahedra. Chem. 2021;7:2160–2174. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Su Y.-M., Wang Z., Schein S., Tung C.-H., Sun D.. A Keplerian Ag90 nest of Platonic and Archimedean polyhedra in different symmetry groups. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3316. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17198-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bu F., Lin Q., Zhai Q., Wang L., Wu T., Zheng S. T., Bu X., Feng P.. Two Zeolite-Type Frameworks in One Metal-Organic Framework with Zn24@Zn104 Cube-in-Sodalite Architecture. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:8538–8541. doi: 10.1002/anie.201203425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tian D., Chen Q., Li Y., Zhang Y.-H., Chang Z., Bu X.-H.. A Mixed Molecular Building Block Strategy for the Design of Nested Polyhedron Metal-Organic Frameworks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:837–841. doi: 10.1002/anie.201307681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Berardo E., Greenaway R. L., Miklitz M., Cooper A. I., Jelfs K. E.. Computational screening for nested organic cage complexes. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2020;5:186–196. doi: 10.1039/C9ME00085B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fujita D., Ueda Y., Sato S., Yokoyama H., Mizuno N., Kumasaka T., Fujita M.. Self-Assembly of M30L60 Icosidodecahedron. Chem. 2016;1:91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu T., Jiang Z., Bai Q., Li Y., Mao S., Yu H., Wojtas L., Tang Z., Chen M., Zhang Z., Xie T.-Z., Wang M., Li X., Wang P.. Supramolecular triangular orthobicupola: Self-assembly of a giant Johnson solid J27. Chem. 2021;7:2429–2441. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu K., Ronson T. K., Su P., Chen Z., Goh L., Heard A. W., Li X., Klautzsch F., Schalley C. A., Vinković M., Nitschke J. R.. Systematic construction of progressively larger capsules from a fivefold linking pyrrole-based subcomponent. Nat. Synth. 2023;2:789–797. doi: 10.1038/s44160-023-00276-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Inomata Y., Oguma S., Sagara N., Nishijima A., Saburomaru Y., Yoshida S., Kajitani T., Shimokawa K., Sato S., Yoshizawa M., Fujita M., Sawada T.. An M60L60 metal-peptide capsid with a 60-crossing woven network. Chem. 2025:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2025.102555. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Prusty S., Chan Y.-T.. Terpyridine-based Self-assembled Heteroleptic Coordination Complexes. Chem. Lett. 2021;50:1202–1212. doi: 10.1246/cl.210048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Howlader P., Schmittel M.. Heteroleptic metallosupramolecular aggregates/complexation for supramolecular catalysis. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2022;18:597–630. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.18.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dietrich-Buchecker C. O., Sauvage J. P., Kintzinger J. P.. Une nouvelle famille de molecules: les metallo-catenanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983;24:5095–5098. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)94050-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Durola F., Heitz V., Reviriego F., Roche C., Sauvage J.-P., Sour A., Trolez Y.. Cyclic [4]­rotaxanes containing two parallel porphyrinic plates: Toward switchable molecular receptors and compressors. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014;47:633–645. doi: 10.1021/ar4002153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Goswami A., Schmittel M.. Heteroleptic copper phenanthroline complexes in motion: From stand-alone devices to multi-component machinery. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018;376:478–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang S. Y., Fu J. H., Liang Y. P., He Y. J., Chen Y. S., Chan Y. T.. Metallo-Supramolecular Self-Assembly of a Multicomponent Ditrigon Based on Complementary Terpyridine Ligand Pairing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:3651–3654. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b01005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang S. Y., Huang J. Y., Liang Y. P., He Y. J., Chen Y. S., Zhan Y. Y., Hiraoka S., Liu Y. H., Peng S. M., Chan Y. T.. Multicomponent Self-Assembly of Metallo-Supramolecular Macrocycles and Cages through Dynamic Heteroleptic Terpyridine Complexation. Chem.Eur. J. 2018;24:9274–9284. doi: 10.1002/chem.201801753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. He L., Wang S.-C., Lin L.-T., Cai J.-Y., Li L., Tu T.-H., Chan Y.-T.. Multicomponent Metallo-Supramolecular Nanocapsules Assembled from Calix[4]­resorcinarene-Based Terpyridine Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:7134–7144. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c01482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. He Y.-J., Tu T.-H., Su M.-K., Yang C.-W., Kong K. V., Chan Y.-T.. Facile Construction of Metallo-supramolecular Poly­(3-hexylthiophene)- block-Poly­(ethylene oxide) Diblock Copolymers via Complementary Coordination and Their Self-Assembled Nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:4218–4224. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fu J. H., Lee Y. H., He Y. J., Chan Y. T.. Facile Self-Assembly of Metallo-Supramolecular Ring-in-Ring and Spiderweb Structures Using Multivalent Terpyridine Ligands. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:6231–6235. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mammen M., Choi S.-K., Whitesides G. M.. Polyvalent Interactions in Biological Systems: Implications for Design and Use of Multivalent Ligands and Inhibitors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998;37:2754–2794. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2754::AID-ANIE2754>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang S.-Y., Lin L.-T., Rani A., Lee G.-S., Chan Y.-T.. Stepwise construction of a metallocatenane based on non-labile bis­(terpyridine)-Cd II complexes. Chem. Commun. 2024;60:7914–7917. doi: 10.1039/D4CC02919D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fu J.-H., Wang S.-Y., Chen Y.-S., Prusty S., Chan Y.-T.. One-Pot Self-Assembly of Stellated Metallosupramolecules from Multivalent and Complementary Terpyridine-Based Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:16217–16221. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b08731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang S.-C., Cheng K.-Y., Fu J.-H., Chan Y.-T.. Conformational Regulation of Multivalent Terpyridine Ligands for Self-Assembly of Heteroleptic Metallo-Supramolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:16661–16667. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c06618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hanan G., Wang J.. A Facile Route to Sterically Hindered and Non-Hindered 4′-Aryl-2,2′:6′,2″-Terpyridines. Synlett. 2005;2005:1251–1254. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-868481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jiang Z., Wu T., Wang S. C., Chen M., Zhao H., Chan Y. T., Wang P.. Metallaoctahedron Derived from the Self-Assembly of Tetranuclear Metal-Organic Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2019;58:35–38. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Xie T.-Z., Guo K., Guo Z., Gao W.-Y., Wojtas L., Ning G.-H., Huang M., Lu X., Li J.-Y., Liao S.-Y., Chen Y.-S., Moorefield C. N., Saunders M. J., Cheng S. Z. D., Wesdemiotis C., Newkome G. R.. Precise Molecular Fission and Fusion: Quantitative Self-Assembly and Chemistry of a Metallo-Cuboctahedron. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:9224–9229. doi: 10.1002/anie.201503609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dang L.-L., Sun Z.-B., Shan W.-L., Lin Y.-J., Li Z.-H., Jin G.-X.. Coordination-driven self-assembly of a molecular figure-eight knot and other topologically complex architectures. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2057. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10075-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Fasting C., Schalley C. A., Weber M., Seitz O., Hecht S., Koksch B., Dernedde J., Graf C., Knapp E.-W., Haag R.. Multivalency as a chemical organization and action principle. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:10472–10498. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Brocker E. R., Anderson S. E., Northrop B. H., Stang P. J., Bowers M. T.. Structures of Metallosupramolecular Coordination Assemblies Can Be Obtained by Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:13486–13494. doi: 10.1021/ja105702y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Chan Y.-T., Li X., Yu J., Carri G. A., Moorefield C. N., Newkome G. R., Wesdemiotis C.. Design, Synthesis, and Traveling Wave Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Characterization of Iron­(II)- and Ruthenium­(II)-Terpyridine Metallomacrocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:11967–11976. doi: 10.1021/ja107307u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lanucara F., Holman S. W., Gray C. J., Eyers C. E.. The power of ion mobility-mass spectrometry for structural characterization and the study of conformational dynamics. Nat. Chem. 2014;6:281–294. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kalenius E., Groessl M., Rissanen K.. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry of supramolecular complexes and assemblies. Nat. Rew. Chem. 2019;3:4–14. doi: 10.1038/s41570-018-0062-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mesleh M. F., Hunter J. M., Shvartsburg A. A., Schatz G. C., Jarrold M. F.. Structural Information from Ion Mobility Measurements: Effects of the Long-Range Potential. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100:16082–16086. doi: 10.1021/jp961623v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sato S., Ishido Y., Fujita M.. Remarkable Stabilization of M12L24 Spherical Frameworks through the Cooperation of 48 Pd­(II)-Pyridine Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:6064–6065. doi: 10.1021/ja900676f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu L., Zhang D., Zhu Y., Han Y.. Bulk and local structures of metal-organic frameworks unravelled by high-resolution electron microscopy. Commun. Chem. 2020;3:99. doi: 10.1038/s42004-020-00361-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Franke D., Petoukhov M. V., Konarev P. V., Panjkovich A., Tuukkanen A., Mertens H. D. T., Kikhney A. G., Hajizadeh N. R., Franklin J. M., Jeffries C. M., Svergun D. I.. ATSAS 2.8: a comprehensive data analysis suite for small-angle scattering from macromolecular solutions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2017;50:1212–1225. doi: 10.1107/S1600576717007786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Maglic J. B., Lavendomme R.. MoloVol: an easy-to-use program for analyzing cavities, volumes and surface areas of chemical structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2022;55:1033–1044. doi: 10.1107/S1600576722004988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mondal B., Mukherjee P. S.. Cage Encapsulated Gold Nanoparticles as Heterogeneous Photocatalyst for Facile and Selective Reduction of Nitroarenes to Azo Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:12592–12601. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Senthilnathan J., Rao K. S., Lin W.-H., Ting J.-M., Yoshimura M.. Formation of reusable Au-acetonitrile polymers and N-doped graphene catalyst under UV light via submerged liquid plasma process. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:3035–3043. doi: 10.1039/C4TA05586A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja5c10891_si_001.pdf (16MB, pdf)
Download video file (35MB, mp4)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES