Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Mar 26;66(10):1606–1620. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14152

Examining the association between placental malperfusion assessed by histopathological examination and child and adolescent neurodevelopment: a systematic review

Noha Ibrahim 1, ,, Sydni A Weissgold 2, , Lucy Brink 3, Ibtihal Mahgoub 4, Ben Carter 5, Vaheshta Sethna 2, , Hein Odendaal 3,
PMCID: PMC12447690  PMID: 40134364

Abstract

Background

Placental malperfusion, categorised into maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) and foetal vascular malperfusion (FVM), is a main placental pathology known to affect placental functioning and offspring outcomes. The aim of this review is to evaluate the association between exposure to placental malperfusion and offspring neurodevelopment from birth to 18 years of age.

Methods

Following the registered protocol on Prospero, Medline, Cochrane, CINHAL, Embase and PsycINFO databases were searched systematically from inception to 01/11/2023. Included were publications examining exposure to placental malperfusion detected on histopathological examination and clinically measured neurodevelopmental outcomes. Publications on multi‐pregnancies or animals, exposure to malformations, surgical or medical interventions, review and opinion articles, or those not translated to English, were excluded. Grey literature search and forward and backward citation chaining were performed. The Joanna Briggs Institute's checklists were used for quality assessment. Three studies were pooled using percentages of adjusted associations.

Results

Nine observational studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The included neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed from 5 days to 8 years when age of assessment is reported. Four publications showed an association between exposure to MVM and poor neurodevelopment at 10–40 months and 8 years, however, no association was observed when examining preterm infants up to 24 months. Conversely, in the six studies examining exposure to FVM, FVM association with neurodevelopmental disorders was reported in two studies looking at preterm infants assessed at 24 months and 8 years and better neurodevelopmental scores in other two studies at 10–40 months.

Conclusions

The pattern of association between MVM and FVM with neurodevelopmental outcomes varied among the included studies. Clinical and methodological heterogeneities and poor reporting of relevant populations' characteristics hindered full understanding of the results. Methodologically rigorous research is required to help utilise histopathological findings of placental malperfusion in predicting offspring's neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Keywords: Placental vascular malperfusion, placental vascular under‐perfusion, placental histopathology, neurodevelopmental disorders, systematic review

Introduction

The placenta is a unique organ that facilitates the exchange of nutrients and waste products between the mother and the foetus through maternal and foetal vascular circulations. Maternal‐foetal vascular circulations, separated by the 4th week of pregnancy, enable the placenta to function effectively (Ernst & Carreon, 2019; Wang, 2010). Lesions to these circulations are classified under Maternal Vascular Malperfusion (MVM) and Foetal Vascular Malperfusion (FVM) as per the Amsterdam Consensus Statement of 2015 and are critical in evaluating placental pathologies (Khong et al., 2016; Redline, Ravishankar, Bagby, Saab, & Zarei, 2021). MVM may result from lesions to the decidua, the maternal part of the placenta, referred to as decidual arteriopathy (replacing the term decidual vasculopathy), as well as infarcts, retroplacental haemorrhage, distal villous hypoplasia, and accelerated villous maturation (AVM). Further, increased syncytial knots and intervillous fibrin commonly accompany MVM pathologies (Khong et al., 2016). On the other hand, FVM is characterised by obstructive changes in the larger foetal vessels, leading to complications such as thrombosis, and post‐obstructive degeneration of distal villous tree including avascular villi, villous stromal karyorrhexis (replacing the term haemorrhagic endovasculitis) (Redline & Ravishankar, 2018). Other markers of FVM are vascular intramural fibrin deposition, stem vessel obliteration/fibromuscular sclerosis, and vascular ectasia (Redline, 2022). MVM has been associated with adverse outcomes such as preeclampsia and small for gestational age (SGA) (Khong et al., 2016). Preeclampsia is linked to neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) (Jenabi, Karami, Khazaei, & Bashirian, 2018) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Bitsko et al., 2024; Zhao & Xia, 2022) and SGA in term offerings, is linked to neurodevelopmental delays (Arcangeli, Thilaganathan, Hooper, Khan, & Bhide, 2012; Nadal et al., 2014; Savchev et al., 2013). Furthermore, among other placental pathologies, both MVM and FVM are associated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (Redline, 2008), a complication that is associated with poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes (Levine et al., 2015; Murray et al., 2015).

Although existing reviews have explored the placental origins of diseases at various life stages (Altshuler, 1993; Chen & Shenoy, 2022; Gardella et al., 2022; Kratimenos & Penn, 2019; Lodefalk, Chelslín, Karlsson, & Hansson, 2023; Mir, Leon, & Chalak, 2021; Redline, 2022; Roescher, Timmer, Erwich, & Bos, 2014; Spinillo et al., 2023; Yallapragada, Mestan, & Ernst, 2016; Ylijoki, Ekholm, Ekblad, & Lehtonen, 2019), there has been no systematic review on the association between placental malperfusion and neurodevelopment in children and adolescents. Moreover, inconclusive findings are reported due to methodological issues such as small sample sizes and difficulty synthesising results from diverse populations, methods and age points (Ylijoki et al., 2019). For further research, the evidence encourages addressing the timing of exposure, concurrent placental pathologies (Mir et al., 2021), and lesions' severity and chronicity (Burton, Barker, Moffett, & Thornburg, 2010; Mir et al., 2021; Redline, 2022) and specifying the studied outcomes (Redline, 2022). However, studying the association of neurodevelopmental outcomes following exposure to placental lesions is challenged by the limited access to information on offspring’s neurological examination, imaging and Doppler (Sotiros, Thornhill, Post, Winn, & Armstrong, 2021). Also, outcomes of placental pathology might not be evident by the time the placenta is examined in retrospective study designs, and placentas are rarely sent to pathology, resulting in possible bias by mainly examining high‐risk placentas (Roescher, Timmer, Erwich et al., 2014). With these gaps identified, further research was called for to study the effects of placental lesions as it is expected to bring valuable information by understanding its associations with developmental outcomes (Chen & Shenoy, 2022; Gardella et al., 2022; Lodefalk et al., 2023).

Given the placenta's vascular composition, it is believed that abnormalities in the placenta's blood flow are the main drive of its pathological lesions (Chen & Shenoy, 2022). Following Barker's theory of foetal programming (Sallout & Mark, 2003) and the growing field of neuroplacentology (Gardella et al., 2022; Kratimenos & Penn, 2019; Mir et al., 2021), this review aims to examine the association between placental malperfusion detected on histopathological examination and child and adolescent neurodevelopmental outcomes detected clinically. The findings of this review will provide insight into the potential impact of placental malperfusion on neurodevelopment outcomes and may inform strategies for early detection and intervention to mitigate any potential negative effects.

Methods

This review is reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines 2020 (Page et al., 2021). The protocol for this systematic review is registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), ID=CRD42022292935, and can be accessed at www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022292935. Five databases (Medline, Cochrane, CINHAL, Embase and PsycINFO) were searched from inception to the day of search on 01.11.2023. Different search terms were used as appropriate to databases, agreed on by (NI and BS). Text words and subject heading terms for corresponding databases were used: medical subject headings (MeSH) terms for Medline, Cochrane and CINHAL and Emtree for Embase and Descriptors for PsycINFO with no limitation to the searches (see Table S1). Studies were uploaded into EndNote version 20.4.1 for citation and were then uploaded to Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia, available at www.covidence.org, to remove duplicates and to screen the articles. Next, one reviewer (NI) screened the resources by their title and abstract against the inclusion criteria. Potentially relevant resources were retrieved and screened by full text, by two reviewers (NI and SW) with an excellent agreement of interrater reliability (Cohen's Kappa = 1) and disagreements were resolved through discussion and consensus agreement among the study group. Grey literature search conducted from relevant electronic databases, conference proceedings, websites on relevant resources (Table S2). Citation chaining was conducted by screening the reference lists and the resources that cited the included articles. Review articles were reviewed for possible eligible articles for inclusion. Study authors were contacted for more details on unobtainable articles (K = 8).

Data extraction

An online template on Covidence for data collection was created for detailing general information about the included studies, population characteristics and any reported association to exposure and outcome, exposure to placental malperfusion and other placental histopathologies, method of identifying exposure and outcome, outcomes and results of each study using risk and odd ratios as appropriate, as well as p values. After piloting the template, five reviewers extracted the data from individual studies independently (NI, IS, GO, EA and RD), no disagreements occurred. Adjusted results with p value <.05 were used to indicate significance, a positive association indicates the direction of the association, as an increase in X is associated with an increase in Y. In accordance with our protocol for conducting a meta‐analysis, the minimum requirement of five publications was not met. However, we have pooled adjusted results from binary outcomes of three studies that are clinically and methodologically homogeneous.

Selection criteria

Publications were included if they were studying: (1) Dyads of mothers (or placentas) and their offspring; (2) Exposure to placental malperfusion, maternal and/or foetal vascular malperfusion, on histopathology; (3) Offspring's neurodevelopment, that is; intellectual, communication, and motor development and neurodevelopmental disorders (as listed on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders‐Fifth Edition (DSM‐5)), up to 18 years old measured using a clinical assessment (Clinician administered assessments with or without using diagnostic or standardised assessment tools); (4) Observational studies and baseline measures on experimental and quasi‐experimental study designs looking at neurodevelopmental outcomes in association with presence or absence of exposure to placental malperfusion. Publications were excluded if they studied: (1) Population of transgender mothers, externally fertilised ova and sperm, multi‐pregnancies, or animal studies; (2) Placental pathology examination not on histopathology such as Doppler (3) Mothers and/or offspring exposure during the antenatal period other than as usual management (for example, pharmacological treatment for managing preterm labour) such as induced placental malperfusion via surgery or medication; (4) Offspring with other foetal malformations, chromosomal anomalies, or congenital malformation; (5) Where the outcome studied is foetal death, or neurodevelopment not assessed clinically e.g., structural or imaging assessment; (6) Studies not translated to English, and opinion articles.

Quality assessment

Risk of bias was assessed using standardised critical appraisal instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), results of the bias assessment are presented on Table 3 and Tables S4. Not all publications reported age at assessments, however, when this is reported, the assessment tools used were suitable for the age at assessment.

Table 3.

Assessment of bias using the JBI critical appraisal checklists

Case control studies
The groups were comparable Appropriate matching Same criteria for identifying cases and controls Standard, valid, and reliable measure of the exposure Same measure if exposure for cases and controls Identifying confounding factors Stating strategies to deal with confounding factors Standard, valid, and reliable measure of outcomes for cases and control Enough exposure period Appropriate statistical analysis
Gray et al. (1999) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NA Y
Soullane et al. (2022) Y Y Y UC Y Y Y UC NA Y
Straughen et al. (2017) Y Y Y UC Y Y Y Y NA Y
Cohort studies
Recruiting similar exposed and non exposed groups, from the same population Similar measure of the exposures in exposed and non exposed groups Standard, valid, and reliable measure of the exposure Identifying confounding factors Stating strategies to deal with confounding factors Starting point with participants free of the outcome Valid, and reliable measure of the outcome Enough exposure period Reporting complete, and if not, reporting reason to loss to follow up Reporting strategies to address incomplete follow up
Gardella et al. (2021) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NA Y
Perrone et al. (2012) Y Y UC N N Y UC Y NA Y
Ueda et al. (2022) Y Y UC Y Y Y Y Y NA Y
Redline et al. (2007) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NA Y
Raghavan et al. (2019) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NA Y
Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al. (2014) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NA Y

The checklist rates each item to: yes, no, unclear and not applicable. The overall score is rated as follows: include, exclude, seek further info. Additional comments are also allowed. N, no; NA, not applicable; UC, unclear; Y, yes.

Results

Study selection

Databases search yielded 1,549 articles. Following the removal of duplicates and screening by the title and abstract, 35 were selected for full‐text screening. Three publications were not accessible (authors were contacted four times). In total, nine publications fulfilled eligibility criteria (Figure 1), seven from database search (Gardella et al., 2021; Gray, O'Callaghan, Harvey, Burke, & Payton, 1999; Perrone et al., 2012; Raghavan et al., 2019; Soullane, Spence, & Abenhaim, 2022; Straughen et al., 2017; Ueda et al., 2022) and two from backward citation (Redline, Minich, Taylor, & Hack, 2007; Roescher et al., 2014). No studies were excluded under transgender and externally fertilised population.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of data inclusion (Page et al., 2021). IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; N, number; ND, neurodevelopment; PE, preeclampsia; SGA, small for gestational age

Individual studies characteristics

The included publications were from 1999 to 2022 originating from the United States of America (Raghavan et al., 2019; Redline et al., 2007; Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 3), Italy (Gardella et al., 2021; Perrone et al., 2012) (K = 2), Australia (Gray et al., 1999) (K = 1), Canada (Soullane et al., 2022) (K = 1), Japan (Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 1), and the Netherlands (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 1). All included publications were observational in design including retrospective cohort (Gardella et al., 2021; Perrone et al., 2012; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 5), prospective cohort (Raghavan et al., 2019) (K = 1), and case–control studies (Gray et al., 1999; Soullane et al., 2022; Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 3) (Table 1). No trial studies comprised the sample of this systematic review.

Table 1.

Included publications characteristics

Study Exposure Outcome assessment method

Gray et al. (1999)

Australia,

Case control

MVM: Infarcts and AVM
  • Small peripheral infarcts were considered normal

FVM: None

Classification: As described by Naeye (1987), Naeye (1989), Burke and Tannenberg (1995)

Griffiths Infant Development Scale and NSMDA: (at 4 months only) gross motor, fine motor, neurological, primitive reflexes, postural reactions, and sensory motor

Designed for infants

Gardella et al. (2021),

Italy,

Retrospective cohort

MVM: decidual vasculopathy, arterial or venous abruption, distal hypoplasia, AVM, infarcts.

FVM: intermittent cord obstruction, ectasia, or intramural fibrin of large placental vessels, small foci of avascular or karyorrhectic villi, chorionic plate or stem vessels thrombi, large foci of avascular or karyorrhectic villi.

Classification: Redline classification 2015 (Redline, 2015)

Griffiths' Mental Developmental Scales Extended: locomotor, personal‐social, language, eye and hand co‐ordination, visuospatial performance and, practical reasoning.

Designed for birth to 8 years

Perrone et al. (2012),

Italy, Retrospective cohort

MVM: abruption, extensive infarction or thrombosis, perivillous fibrin deposition, syncytial knots

FVM: NR

Classification: NR

Based on dependence on caregivers, cerebral palsy, intelligence quotient score, and sensorineural hearing loss

Straughen et al. (2017), USA,

Case–control

MVM: At least 3 of the following: decreased villous size, subjectively reduced distal capillary networks, increased syncytial basophilia, excess perivillous fibrin, cytotrophoblast proliferation

FVM: embedded mural thrombi in chorionic plate or foetal stem vessels, chronic obstructive vascular lesions, villi with stromal karyorrhectic debris

Villous oedema (17.3%)‐reported separately.

Classification: NR

ICD9

Raghavan et al. (2019)

The Netherlands,

Prospective cohort

MVM: MVM reported separately.

FVM: Reported separately, VSVA.

Classification: Redline classification 2015 (Redline, 2015)

ICD codes

Soullane et al. (2022)

Canada,

Case–control

MVM: ischemic infarct, hyper mature placenta

FVM: NR

Classification: NR
  • Categories in this review as per Amsterdam's Criteria (Khong et al., 2016)
Program at the Montreal Children's Hospital

Ueda et al. (2022),

USA,

Retrospective cohort

MVM: Reported separately, AVM, decidual arteriopathy

FVM: Reported separately, thrombosis or intramural fibrin deposition, avascular villi

Classification: NR

MSEL: gross motor, fine motor, visual reception, receptive language, and expressive language

Designed for birth to 68 months

Redline et al. (2007),

USA,

Retrospective cohort

MVM: Increased syncytial knots, acute atherosis, multiple villous infarcts

FVM: Villous oedema, foetal thrombosis, avascular villi.

Classification: Kraus 2004 (Kraus, Redline, Gersell, Nelson, & Dicke, 2004)

K‐ABC: hand movements, triangles, word order, and matrix analogies

Designed for age from 3 to 18 years

NEPSY: design copying, tower, arrows, visual attention, comprehension of instructions, and list learning

Designed for 3–16 years

Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al. (2014),

Japan,

Retrospective cohort

MVM: Decidual vasculopathy, placental hypoplasia, increased syncytial knotting, villous agglutination, increased perivillous fibrin, distal villous hypoplasia, infarction, retroplacental hematoma.

FVM: thrombosis, intimal fibrin cushions, fibromuscular sclerosis, haemorrhagic endovasculitis, at least 5 avascular fibrotic villi without inflammation or mineralisation ± adherent thrombi in stem vessels

Classification: Adopted from articles by Redline published 2004 (Redline et al., 2004a2004b)

Prechtl's method: normal when movements involve infant's entire body, are complex, and variable in sequence of arms, legs, neck, and trunk. Abnormal when lack complexity, variability, and fluency including poor repertoire, chaotic, and cramped‐synchronised or when short in duration; hypokinetic

AVM, accelerated villous maturation; FVM, foetal vascular malperfusion; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; K‐ABC, Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children Mental Processing Composite; MSEL, Mullen Scales of Early Learning; MVM, maternal vascular malperfusion; NEPSY, Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment; NR, not reported; NSMDA, Neuro‐Sensory Motor Developmental Assessment; VSVA, Villous Stromal‐Vascular Abnormalities.

Three publications included preterm births, where preterm was defined as gestational age (GA) less than 32 weeks (Perrone et al., 2012; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 2) or up to 34 weeks (Gardella et al., 2021) (K = 1) and none of the included publications investigated term offspring only (Table 2). Gender distribution varied among the publications (Table 1), and results in male offspring were analysed separately in one study, addressing the prevalence of ASD in males (Soullane et al., 2022). The age of offspring at the time of neurodevelopment assessment was conducted at multiple points at days 5, 8 and 15 (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) or 4 and 12 months (Gray et al., 1999) or at a single point between 10 and 40 months (Ueda et al., 2022), at 24 months (Gardella et al., 2021), and 8 years (Redline et al., 2007) (Table 1). Age of child at time of assessment was not reported in four publications.

Table 2.

Included publications results

Source Population Exposure Outcome Results N (%)
Age at assessment Normal/not normal
N (%)
Gray et al. (1999)

N = 68 (IUGR only group)

Term = 81%

Females = NR

GA = NR

MA = NR

Any MVM = 12 (9)
  • GQ scores mean and Level of neuromotor disability

  • 4 months and 12 months

  • NR

Griffiths (4 and 12 months):

No MMV: 23 (100)/0

MMV: 23 (100)/0

NSMDA (4 months):

No MVM: 15 (68)/7 (31)

MVM: 21 (75)/7 (25)

Gardella et al. (2021)

N = 198 (IUGR & BW ≤1,500 g)

Term = all preterm

Females = NR

GA = ≤34

MA (median) = 33

MVM = 119 (60%)

FVM = 42 (21%)

  • GQ scores mean

  • 24 months

  • No NDD/NDD = 148 (74.7)/50 (25.3)

No MVM: 90 (61)/25 (50)

MVM: 25 (50)/25 (50)

No FVM: 132 (89)/16 (11)

FVM: 37 (74)/13 (26) a

Perrone et al. (2012)

N = 105

Term = all preterm

Females = NR

GA = 23–31

MA = NR

MVM = 29 (28)
  • Cutoff criteria

  • Mean = 12 months

  • No NDD/NDD = 35 (94)/2 (6)

No MVM: 18 (90)/2 (10)

MVM: 15 (100)/0 (0)

Straughen et al. (2017)

N = 254

Term = NR

Females = NR

GA (median) = 37

MA (mean) = 31

MVM = 5 (2):

FVM = 54 (21.2)

VO = 44 (17.3)

  • ASD

  • NR

  • 55 (21.6)

MVM: 1 (0.5)/4 (7) a

‐Same pattern noted with males only cases

FVM: 41 (75)/13 (24)

VO: 43 (22)/1 (2) a

Raghavan et al. (2019)

N = 1,031

Term = 47%

Females = 48%

GA = NR

MA (mean) = 29

MVM = 404 (37)

FVM = 18 (2)

VSVA = 19 (2)

  • NDDs
  • NR
  • No NDD/NDD = 363 (35)/668 (65)

(ASD 7%, ADHD 21%, Other NDD 36.5%)

No MVM: 221 (61)/406 (61)

MVM: 142 (39)/262 (39)

No FVM: 359 (99)/654 (98)

FVM: 4 (1)/14 (2)

No VSVA: 353 (97)/659 (98)

VSVA: 10 (3)/9 (1)

Soullane et al. (2022)

N = 630

Term = 60%

Females = 44%

GA (median) = 39

MA (median) = 31.5

MVM = 9 (1)

(ischemic infarct = 2 (0), hyper mature placenta = 7 (1))

  • ASD

  • NR

  • 107 (17)

Ischemic Infarct: 0/2 (2)

Hyper mature placenta: 2 (0.4)/5 (4.7) a

(Rejected by the authors due to small number of exposures)

Ueda et al. (2022)

N = 258

Term = 86.5%

Females = 48%

GA (mean) = 38

MA (mean) = 33

MVM = (46.5) (AVM (26), decidual arteriopathy (35.7))

FVM = (33.3) (thrombosis or intramural fibrin deposition (29.5), avascular villi (10.1))

  • Composite scores mean

  • Assessment age: 10, 14, 18, 24, 32, and 40 months

  • NR

MVM: delayed neurodevelopment a

(AVM a but not Decidual arteriopathy)

FVM: faster neurodevelopment a

(thrombosis or intramural fibrin deposition a and avascular villi a )

Redline et al. (2007)

N = 151

Term = NR

Females = 57%

GA = mean 26

MA = median 27.1

All offspring were extremely Low in BW < kg

MVM = (46.5)

FVM = (33)

  • Cutoff scores

  • 8 years

  • NR

K‐ABC

Increased syncytial knots: 6 (43)/36 (31)

Acute atherosis: 2 (14)/13 (11)

Multiple villous infarcts: 2 (14)/14 (12)

VO: 6 (43)/19 (17)

Foetal thrombosis: 3 (21)/25 (22)

Avascular villi: 2 (14) 12 (10)

NEPSY

Increased syncytial knots: 8 (38)/33 (31)

Acute atherosis = 4 (19)/10 (10)

Multiple villous infarcts: 6 (29)/9 (9) a

VO: 8 (38)/ 16 (15) a

Foetal thrombosis: 7 (33)/21 (20)

Avascular villi: 2 (10)/12 (11)

Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al. (2014)

N = 52

Term = all preterm

Females = 57.7%

GA <32 median 29.1

MA = NR

MVM = (56)

FVM = (17)

  • Cutoff criteria

  • Days 5 (46), 8 (43) and 15 (43)

  • NR

Day 5 – Day 8 – Day 15

No MVM: 11 (24)/10 (22) – 10/10 (23) – 8 (19)/11 (25.5)

MVM: 17 (47)/8 (17) – 13 (30)/10 (23) – 8 (17)/15 (35)

No FVM: 23 (50)/16 (35)–16 (37)/18 (42)–13 (30)/23 (53)

FVM: 5 (11)/2 (4)–6 (14)/2 (5)–4 (9)/3 (7)

N of normal general movements increased as time progressed a

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; AVM, accelerated villous maturation; FVM, foetal vascular malperfusion; GA, gestational age in weeks; GQ, general quotient; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; K‐ABC, Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children Mental Processing Composite; MA, maternal age at birth in years; MVM, maternal vascular malperfusion; N, number; NDD, neurodevelopmental disorder; NEPSY, developmental neuropsychological assessment; NR, not reported; NSMDA, neuro‐sensory motor developmental assessment; VO, villous oedema; VSVA, villous stromal‐vascular abnormalities.

a

Statistically significant, p value < .05.

Regarding exposure to placental malperfusion, MVM was identified in all nine studies, and only six examined FVM (Gardella et al., 2021; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Spinillo et al., 2021; Straughen et al., 2017; Ueda et al., 2022). Various tools for the assessment of placental pathology were used (Table 1) with varied definitions of placental malperfusion (Table S3). Utilising the Amsterdam's consensus criteria (Khong et al., 2016), publications reported MVM as infarction (Gardella et al., 2021; Gray et al., 1999; Perrone et al., 2012; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Soullane et al., 2022) (K = 6), retroplacental haemorrhage/hematoma (clinical term is placental abruption) (Gardella et al., 2021; Perrone et al., 2012; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 3), distal villous hypoplasia/reduced distal capillary networks/placental hypoplasia (Gardella et al., 2021; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 3), AVM/hypermature placenta (Gardella et al., 2021; Gray et al., 1999; Soullane et al., 2022; Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 4), and decidual arteriopathy/acute atherosis (Gardella et al., 2021; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 4), while FVM consisted of thrombosis (Gardella et al., 2021; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Straughen et al., 2017; Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 5), segmental avascular villi (Gardella et al., 2021; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 4), villous stromal‐vascular karyorrhexis/villous stromal‐vascular abnormalities (Gardella et al., 2021; Raghavan et al., 2019; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 4), vascular intramural fibrin deposition (Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 1), fibromuscular sclerosis (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 1), and vascular ectasia (Gardella et al., 2021) (K = 1). Other placental pathologies studied not included in Amsterdam's criteria for MVM were increased perivillous fibrin or deposition (Perrone et al., 2012; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 3), cytotrophoblast proliferation (Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 1), increased syncytial knots/increased syncytial basophilia (Perrone et al., 2012; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 4) placental hypoplasia (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) /decreased villous size (Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 2), and villous agglutination (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 1), and for FVM were intermitted cord obstruction (Gardella et al., 2021) (K = 1), villous oedema (Redline et al., 2007), however, not reported as FVM (Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 2), and intimal fibrin cushions (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 1) (Table S3). Similarly, diverse neurodevelopmental outcomes were identified by observing the offspring using assessment tools (Gardella et al., 2021; Gray et al., 1999; Raghavan et al., 2019; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Soullane et al., 2022; Straughen et al., 2017; Ueda et al., 2022), retrieved from offspring’ clinical records (Raghavan et al., 2019; Soullane et al., 2022; Straughen et al., 2017), or via examining offspring neurological development (Perrone et al., 2012).

Baring one study (Perrone et al., 2012), confounders were adjusted for in the cohort studies, matching addressed confounder variables in case control studies (Table S4). The most commonly utilised confounders were birthweight (BW); including Z‐scores (Gardella et al., 2021; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 4) and child's sex (Gray et al., 1999; Raghavan et al., 2019; Redline et al., 2004b; Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 4). Other populations' characteristics were associated with the outcomes and/or the exposures but were not adjusted for. MVM showed significant associations with placental features including lower placental weight, cord blood pH ≤7, lower foetal to placental BW ratio (Gardella et al., 2021), and postnatally with offspring's GA, low BW (Gardella et al., 2021; Gray et al., 1999; Perrone et al., 2012), smaller head circumference (Gray et al., 1999), clinical abnormality/care needed (Gardella et al., 2021; Gray et al., 1999). FVM was associated with offspring's low BW and high illness severity at first 24 h after birth (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014). Significant associations with neurodevelopmental disorders were mothers having eclampsia/preeclampsia, hypothyroidism (Soullane et al., 2022) and hypertension (Straughen et al., 2017) while offspring's GA ≤32 (Soullane et al., 2022), low BW, and black race (Straughen et al., 2017) were associated with ASD. General movement abnormalities in the first 2 weeks after birth were significantly higher in low BW, low GA, higher illness severity at first 24 h after birth, incubation after 1 week of birth, and lower placental weight (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014). neurodevelopmental disorders as per the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), including ADHD, ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders, were associated with offspring's male sex, preterm birth (with or without MVM), low BW, and maternal smoking, diabetes mellitus and body mass index (Raghavan et al., 2019).

Placental malperfusion and neurodevelopmental outcomes results

Table 2 shows the results of the individual studies and the reported results of associations between MVM and FVM with neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Maternal vascular malperfusion and neurodevelopmental outcomes

An association between exposure to MVM and poor neurodevelopmental outcomes was described in four studies (Redline et al., 2007; Soullane et al., 2022; Straughen et al., 2017; Ueda et al., 2022), while no association was found in the publications studying preterm offspring only (Gardella et al., 2021; Perrone et al., 2012; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014), mainly preterm offspring (Raghavan et al., 2019), or offspring with IUGR (Gray et al., 1999). A positive association between MVM (N = 120) and AVM (N = 67) with lower composite scores on Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) at 10–40 months was found in a population of 258 offspring with a mean GA of 38.4 weeks (Ueda et al., 2022). Similarly, MVM identified as ischemic infarct (N = 2), and hypermature placenta (N = 7), were associated with ASD (N = 107), p < .03 and p < .0001; respectively, in a population of 630 offspring with a median GA of 39 weeks (Soullane et al., 2022). Also, MVM (N = 5) and ASD cases diagnosed using ICD (N = 55) were associated in a population of 254 offspring with GA median >37 weeks, p < .02 (odd ratio = 12.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.37–110.69) (Straughen et al., 2017), however, method of MVM classification and age at time of assessment were not reported. Lastly, only multiple villous infarcts (N = 16), an indicator of MVM, was identified as significant predictors of the relatively lower composite scores in the infantile neurodevelopmental milestones using a Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment (NEPSY) (N = 32) at 8 years, p = <0.05, in a population were offspring median GA of 27.1 weeks, this association persisted after adjustment for cerebral palsy but not with adjustment for perinatal and social risk factors (Redline et al., 2007).

When studying preterm offspring only, there was no association found between exposure to MVM (N = 119) as per Redline's classifications (Redline, 2015; Redline et al., 1993) and neurodevelopmental disorder as per Griffiths' Mental Developmental Scales Extended (N = 50) at 24 months in offspring subjected to IUGR (Gardella et al., 2021), or neurodevelopmental disorder based on Prechtl's method assessing general movements in the first 2 weeks after birth (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014). Of note, at day 5, in the MVM group (N = 29), poor repertoire to normal general movement ratio was 16: 7, however, general movement was noticed to improve with time irrelevant of the exposure and this ratio retreated at day 15; poor repertoire to normal general movement changed to 7: 15 in the MVM group (Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014). The lack of association between MVM (N = 29) and neurodevelopmental disorder in preterm offspring was replicated when offspring neurodevelopment was assessed at 12 months (N = 15), however, no details on the exposure or outcome classification were reported (Perrone et al., 2012). MVM as per Redline classification (N = 404) was not associated with neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosed by ICD codes including ASD, ADHD and other neurodevelopmental disorders (N = 668) in a study of 1,031 offspring, this lack of association continued when term offspring were used as a reference, age at assessment not reported (Raghavan et al., 2019). The adjusted results of three publications were pooled (Gardella et al., 2021; Perrone et al., 2012; Raghavan et al., 2019) suggesting no evidence of an effect between MVM and neurodevelopmental disorders in infants that were preterm at birth (odd ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.79, 1.30; p = .93; I 2 = 0%; Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pooled results of maternal vascular malperfusion and neurodevelopmental disorders. CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haenszel statistics; MVM, maternal vascular malperfusion

In summary, 44.4% of the included publications showed positive association between MVM and poor neurodevelopmental outcomes, mainly in populations where most of the offspring were term considering infarction (Redline et al., 2007; Soullane et al., 2022) (K = 2), AVM (Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 1), and increased syncytial knots (Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 1). However, AVM and infarcts were not associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants subjected to IUGR (Gardella et al., 2021; Gray et al., 1999) (K = 2) and syncytial knots was not associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in other publications (Perrone et al., 2012; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 3). Positive associations were evident with ASD (Soullane et al., 2022; Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 2) and with neurocognition (K = 2) assessed at 10–40 months (Ueda et al., 2022) and 8 years (Redline et al., 2007). No association between MVM and neurodevelopmental outcomes was found in publications studying preterm offspring (Gardella et al., 2021; Perrone et al., 2012; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 3) or specific lesions studied individually or collectively including; decidual arteriopathy/ acute atherosis (Gardella et al., 2021; Raghavan et al., 2019; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 5), abruption (Gardella et al., 2021; Perrone et al., 2012; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 3), placental hypoplasia/decreased villous size (Gardella et al., 2021; Raghavan et al., 2019; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 3), and perivillous fibrin deposition (Perrone et al., 2012; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 2). Publications showing no association with MVM assessed neurodevelopment at a shorter term (5 days to 2 years) compared to those associated with poor outcomes (10 months to 8 years).

Foetal vascular malperfusion and neurodevelopmental outcomes

Among the six publications addressing FVM (Gardella et al., 2021; Raghavan et al., 2019; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014; Straughen et al., 2017; Ueda et al., 2022), four reported an association with neurodevelopmental outcomes. In a cohort of 198 preterm offspring, GA ≤34 weeks, that were subjected to IUGR, FVM (lesions including intermittent cord obstruction, ectasia, or intramural fibrin of large placental vessels, small foci of avascular or karyorrhectic villi, chorionic plate or stem vessels thrombi, large foci of avascular or karyorrhectic villi), overall (N = 42) and severe (N = 7) were associated with overall neurodevelopmental disorder (N = 50) and major neurodevelopmental disorder (N = 30) assessed by Griffiths' Mental Developmental Scales Extended at 24 months, p < .05; the association persisted after adjusting for GA, BW and preeclampsia (Gardella et al., 2021). Villous oedema, a placental pathology that is sometimes reported under FVM, was associated with low neurocognitive scores were assessed at 8 years using NEPSY and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children Mental Processing Composite (K‐ABC) (N = 32), in a population of 151 offspring with mean GA of 26.4 weeks that were subjected to severe IUGR (Redline et al., 2007).

Paradoxically, an association between FVM (identified as thrombosis, intramural fibrin deposition, avascular villi, and FVM reported separately) and a relatively higher MSEL composite scores (indicating a greater neurodevelopmental skills), assessed at 10–40 months of age, was identified in a study of 258 offspring, GA mean 38.4 weeks, 95% CI = 3.41 (1.74–5.07) adjusted for maternal parity, BW, and infant sex (Ueda et al., 2022). Likewise, villous oedema was associated with less risk for ASD as per ICD9 criteria (N = 55), in a study of 258 offspring with a median GA of 37.4 weeks (Straughen et al., 2017).

In summary, mixed patterns of associations are noted between FVM and neurodevelopmental outcomes. One‐third showed no association, another third was associated with better outcomes, and the final third was linked to poorer outcomes. Villous oedema was associated with better outcomes (Straughen et al., 2017) (K = 1) and poor outcomes (Redline et al., 2007) (K = 1). Additionally, thrombosis and avascular villi were linked to good outcomes (Ueda et al., 2022) (K = 1), poor outcomes (Gardella et al., 2021) (K = 1) and also no association (Raghavan et al., 2019; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014). FVM associations with poor outcomes were observed in preterm infants (Gardella et al., 2021) and GA mean 26 (Redline et al., 2007) when neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed at longer term between 2 and 8 years.

Risk of bias

Table 3 shows the result of quality assessments of the included studies assessed by the critical appraisal checklist by JBI (Moola et al., 2020). The publications were good in quality when studied groups are comparable, using a reliable measure for exposure, identifying and dealing with confounders, and using standard and reliable method to assess the outcome (Gardella et al., 2021; Raghavan et al., 2019; Redline et al., 2007; Roescher, Timmer, Hitzert, et al., 2014) (K = 4). Only one study showed poor quality for not identifying and dealing with confounders, using unclear methods to measure exposure and methods (Perrone et al., 2012). Further comments on the quality of the publications are detailed in Table S4.

Discussion

The aim of this review is to examine the association between placental malperfusion and neurodevelopment. MVM and FVM showed different patterns of association with offspring neurodevelopment. Only nine articles were included with clinical and statistical heterogenicities preventing a meaningful pooling of results. Both MVM and FVM were associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes when assessed at older ages; 10 months to 8 years for MVM and 2–8 years for FVM, however, not all publications reported the age at assessment. The association between poor neurodevelopmental outcomes in offspring subjected to MVM was more evident in offspring with median GA > 37 rather than in preterm only studies. This may be explained by (1) the high rate of death in MVM in prematurity (Roescher, Timmer, Erwich, & Bos, 2014), (2) the detection of MVM at advanced weeks of pregnancy (Perrone et al., 2012; Redline et al., 2004b), (3) underrepresentation of placental abruption, mostly followed by prematurity (Redline, 2008), in the included studies, and (4) the practice of delivery before term in women within high‐risk cases like severe IUGR and SGA (Lees, Visser, & Hecher, 2018).

Our pooled findings did not find an effect of MVM on neurodevelopmental outcomes, but this result should be taken with caution as we were not able to include any of the studies offering a positive effect. Findings from Perrone et al. (2012) contradict an association between placental “vasculopathy” including increased syncytial knots (possibly focal or alone), and perivillous fibrin deposition and neurodevelopmental outcomes reporting results on pathological events including (Perrone et al., 2012). These lesions are rather differential lesions of MVM (Redline et al., 2021) and hence their findings don't conclude lack of association between MVM and the outcome. On the other hand, findings by Soullane et al. (2022), that MVM is associated with neurodevelopmental disorders were negated by the authors due to the small number of exposures to MVM (Soullane et al., 2022).

Limited evidence supported an association between FVM and offspring's neurodevelopment; this may be due to (1) FVM is less widely investigated, possibly due to the criteria required for its diagnosis (Redline et al., 2021), (2) the variation in the included pathologies consistent with FVM, for instance, only one publication (Gardella et al., 2021) studied the most common cause of FVM, umbilical obstruction (Redline & Ravishankar, 2018), (3) the severity of FVM was not indicated except in the study showing an association of the severe form of FVM and neurodevelopmental disorder (Gardella et al., 2021), coinciding with the evidence that neuro‐disabilities are associated with severe form of FVM (Redline & Ravishankar, 2018).

Two studies that were excluded from this review, due to the inclusion of twin offspring, confirmed that severe FVM is associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants born with very low BW (Spinillo et al., 2021) and in those subjected to extremely low GA assessed at 2 years (Helderman et al., 2012). FVM and particularly segmental lesions showed an association with neurological abnormalities in infants assessed at neonate intensive care unit (Ravikumar, Mascarenhas, Suman Rao, & Crasta, 2020), highlighting the importance of identifying age at time of assessment, BW, GA, and adjusting for confounders that can explain the huge variation in FVM results. Similarly, it is important to specify the lesion studied as placental malperfusion lesions are widely varied. For instance, villous oedema is included under FVM as per Redline classification 2015 (Redline, 2015) but not Amsterdam's criteria (Khong et al., 2016). The association of FVM with better neurodevelopmental outcomes in two publication is not fully understood but villous oedema is suggested to have a neuroprotective response by Hofbauer Cells present with villous oedema (Straughen et al., 2017) and the authors suggested possible unmeasured confounders resulting in the paradoxical relationship between FVM and higher MSEL composite scores (Ueda et al., 2022).

Strengths and limitations

A thorough review of the literature was carried out here to identify eligible publications, however, a limitation of review articles is that the evidence included is subject to the review questions and included eligibility criteria (Peters et al., 2015). Unlike others taking a broad view on the topic (Lodefalk et al., 2023), our review sheds light on specific exposure and outcome while permitting broad methods of assessments and including all possible associations. However, a limitation of review articles is that the evidence included is subject to the review questions and included eligibility criteria, as such, the review looked at placental malperfusion detected on histopathology and neurodevelopmental outcomes clinically assessed, excluding other methods of assessment such as Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, and possibly preventing additional valuable information in predicting outcomes in offspring. Likewise, the review is limited to results from singleton pregnancies taking into account that the placental circulation is different among twins and singleton pregnancies (Chan, 2006). Very few interventional studies were excluded where placental malperfusion was induced. The reported meta‐analysis was only able to include studies not finding an association and this might have introduced bias into the pooled result. Moreover, our search terms omitted searching for specific placental malperfusion lesions and most of the included publications reported results from exposure to MVM or FVM rather than specific lesions. Furthermore, in the included publications, placental malperfusion was studied among other placental pathologies in small numbers, except in two where placental malperfusion was the only studied pathology (Gardella et al., 2021; Gray et al., 1999). Understanding the results is complicated by the failure to address possible confounders and mediators (Levine et al., 2015) and the poor reporting of the exposure and outcome definitions, method of assessment, placental lesions grading and comorbidities, and age of assessment (Burton et al., 2010; Redline, 2022; Roescher, Timmer, Erwich, et al., 2014). Other limitations are the small number and the small sample sizes of included articles. The small number of included publications and the methodological and clinical heterogeneities have been reported in previous literature reviews on the topic (Levine et al., 2015; Nelson & Blair, 2011; Yallapragada et al., 2016). Addressing the age of assessing the neurodevelopmental outcomes is of clinical significance as it may indicate a pattern of compensation or deterioration in relation to time. Likewise, differences in GA were not addressed adequately, possibly impacting on the association between FVM and neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants (Spinillo et al., 2023). No study looked at the topic addressing transgender mothers or artificial fertilisation, an area that needs exploring. The use of different terminologies to describe placental vascular lesions continues to cause difficulties in reporting outcomes of placental lesions despite the efforts by Amsterdam Consensus Statement in 2015 (Redline, 2022). Given these limitations, our results are inconclusive, and further evidence is needed to understand the association between placental malperfusion on histopathology and offspring's neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood.

Conclusion

Among placental malperfusion lesions, MVM shows an association with offspring's neurodevelopmental disorders, while FVM showed heterogeneous patterns of associations with clinically assessed neurodevelopmental outcomes in children and adolescents. Despite the appreciation of the role of the placenta in predicting the offspring's health, further evidence is yet to bring an understanding of the role of placental malperfusion and its significance in predicting the outcomes in the offspring's neurodevelopment at different time points. Research should address the magnitude of lesions in conjunction with co‐occurring placental pathologies and clinical comorbidities using reproducible reporting systems of the exposure and primary outcomes to provide useful information to clinicians (Khong et al., 2016; Mir et al., 2020, 2021; Ylijoki et al., 2019) in predicting and even managing neurodevelopmental disorders (Lodefalk et al., 2023; Yallapragada et al., 2016). On the other hand, obstetricians should be aware that some placental pathologies, including infarcts, are common and can be detected in normal placentas (Redline, 2008) and that compensatory mechanisms of the placenta can help prevent significant clinical consequences (Yallapragada et al., 2016). Moreover, clinicians need to acknowledge the clinical context of both mother and offspring when interpreting placental pathological findings. The results from this review are emphasising the theory that placental malperfusion is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes and that researchers should invest in addressing the topic using high‐quality methodologies. This can direct future practices of sharing and interpreting placental pathologies detected.

Key points.

  • Placental malperfusion is a main driver of placental pathological lesions.

  • Maternal and foetal vascular malperfusion have different patterns of associations with neurodevelopmental outcomes in children and adolescents.

  • Maternal vascular malperfusion is associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes, this is not evident in populations of preterm infants mainly.

  • Possible resilience processes are yet to be understood explaining preserved or better neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants exposed to placental malperfusion.

  • Understanding the association of placental malperfusion and neurodevelopment is promising in directing clinical practices, rigorous research in the field is needed.

Supporting information

Table S1. Search strategy on 01.11.2023.

Table S2. Grey literature search.

Table S3. Placental Microscopic vascular pathology classifications.

Table S4. Individual publications bias quality and confounders assessment.

JCPP-66-1606-s001.docx (81.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms Breffni Smith, Clinical Librarian, the Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland, for her priceless advice, and contribution in identifying the review search terms. Thanks to Dr. Grace Omoijiade, Department of Psychiatry and Dr Riham Desougi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cavan General Hospital, Lisdaran, Cavan, Ireland, and Dr Enas Abdelraheem, Cavan, Ireland, for their contributions in data extraction and quality assessment of the included articles.

The authors have declared that they have no competing or potential conflicts of interest.

Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

Data availability statement

The data underlying this review are available in the published article and its online supplementary material.

References

  1. Altshuler, G. (1993). Some placental considerations related to neurodevelopmental and other disorders. Journal of Child Neurology, 8, 78–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arcangeli, T. , Thilaganathan, B. , Hooper, R. , Khan, K.S. , & Bhide, A. (2012). Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: A systematic review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 40, 267–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bitsko, R.H. , Holbrook, J.R. , O’Masta, B. , Maher, B. , Cerles, A. , Saadeh, K. , … & Kaminski, J.W. (2024). A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prenatal, birth, and postnatal factors associated with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Prevention Science, 25(Suppl 2), 203–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke, C.J. , & Tannenberg, A.E. (1995). Prenatal brain damage and placental infarction – An autopsy study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 37, 555–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burton, G.J. , Barker, D.J.P. , Moffett, A. , & Thornburg, K. (2010). The placenta and human developmental programming. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available from: https://books.google.ie/books?id=cq-Z4SNRo30C [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan, F.Y. (2006). Obstetric implications of multiple gestation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 46(Suppl. 1), S11–S13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, S. , & Shenoy, A. (2022). Placental pathology and the developing brain. In Seminars in pediatric neurology (Vol. 42, p. 100975). Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ernst, L.M. , & Carreon, C.K. (2019). Placenta. In Ernst L.M., Ruchelli E.D., Carreon C.K., & Huff D.S. (Eds.), Color atlas of human fetal and neonatal histology (pp. 399–424). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-11425-1_36 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gardella, B. , Dominoni, M. , Caporali, C. , Cesari, S. , Fiandrino, G. , Longo, S. , … & Spinillo, A. (2021). Placental features of fetal vascular malperfusion and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age in severe fetal growth restriction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 225, 413.e1–413.e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gardella, B. , Dominoni, M. , Scatigno, A.L. , Cesari, S. , Fiandrino, G. , Orcesi, S. , & Spinillo, A. (2022). What is known about neuroplacentology in fetal growth restriction and in preterm infants: A narrative review of literature. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13, 936171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gray, P.H. , O'Callaghan, M.J. , Harvey, J.M. , Burke, C.J. , & Payton, D.J. (1999). Placental pathology and neurodevelopment of the infant with intrauterine growth restriction. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 41, 16–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Helderman, J.B. , O'Shea, T.M. , Kuban, K.C. , Allred, E.N. , Hecht, J.L. , Dammann, O. , … & Leviton, A. (2012). Antenatal antecedents of cognitive impairment at 24 months in extremely low gestational age newborns. Pediatrics, 129, 494–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jenabi, E. , Karami, M. , Khazaei, S. , & Bashirian, S. (2018). The association between preeclampsia and autism spectrum disorders among children: A meta‐analysis. Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 62(4), 126–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Khong, T.Y. , Mooney, E.E. , Ariel, I. , Balmus, N.C. , Boyd, T.K. , Brundler, M.A. , … & Gordijn, S.J. (2016). Sampling and definitions of placental lesions: Amsterdam placental workshop group consensus statement. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 140, 698–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kratimenos, P. , & Penn, A.A. (2019). Placental programming of neuropsychiatric disease. Pediatric Research, 86(2), 157–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kraus, F.T. , Redline, R. , Gersell, D. , Nelson, D. , & Dicke, J. (2004). Placental pathology. Washington, DC: American Registry of Pathology. Available from: https://books.google.ie/books?id=FE-oa85hBYwC [Google Scholar]
  17. Lees, C. , Visser, G.H.A. , & Hecher, K. (2018). Placental‐fetal growth restriction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available from: https://books.google.ie/books?id=Bq1jDwAAQBAJ [Google Scholar]
  18. Levine, T.A. , Grunau, R.E. , McAuliffe, F.M. , Pinnamaneni, R. , Foran, A. , & Alderdice, F.A. (2015). Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 135, 126–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lodefalk, M. , Chelslín, F. , Karlsson, J.P. , & Hansson, S.R. (2023). Placental changes and neuropsychological development in children—A systematic review. Cells, 12, 435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mir, I.N. , Chalak, L.F. , Brown, L.S. , Johnson‐Welch, S. , Heyne, R. , Rosenfeld, C.R. , & Kapadia, V.S. (2020). Impact of multiple placental pathologies on neonatal death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants. Pediatric Research, 87, 885–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mir, I.N. , Leon, R. , & Chalak, L.F. (2021). Placental origins of neonatal diseases: Toward a precision medicine approach. Pediatric Research, 89, 377–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Moola, S.Z. , Munn, Z. , Tufanaru, C. , Aromataris, E. , Sears, K. , Sfetcu, R. , … & Mu, P.F. (2020). Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Adelaide: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global [Google Scholar]
  23. Murray, E. , Fernandes, M. , Fazel, M. , Kennedy, S.H. , Villar, J. , & Stein, A. (2015). Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: A systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 122, 1062–1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nadal, A. , Parra‐Saavedra, M. , Crovetto, F. , Triunfo, S. , Savchev, S. , Peguero, A. , … & Figueras, F. (2014). Placental findings in late‐onset small for gestational age births without doppler signs of placental insufficiency and their impact in neurodevelopmental outcome. Placenta, 35, A38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Naeye, R.L. (1987). Functionally important disorders of the placenta, umbilical cord, and fetal membranes. Human Pathology, 18, 680–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Naeye, R.L. (1989). Pregnancy hypertension, placental evidences of low uteroplacental blood flow, and spontaneous premature delivery. Human Pathology, 20, 441–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nelson, K.B. , & Blair, E. (2011). The placenta and neurologic and psychiatric outcomes in the child: Study design matters. Placenta, 32, 623–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Page, M.J. , McKenzie, J.E. , Bossuyt, P.M. , Boutron, I. , Hoffmann, T.C. , Mulrow, C.D. , … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Perrone, S. , Toti, P. , Toti, M.S. , Badii, S. , Becucci, E. , Gatti, M.G. , … & Buonocore, G. (2012). Perinatal outcome and placental histological characteristics: A single‐center study. The Journal of Maternal‐Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 25, 110–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peters, M. , Godfrey, C. , McInerney, P. , Soares, C. , Khalil, H. , & Parker, D. (2015). Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. 1–24.
  31. Raghavan, R. , Helfrich, B.B. , Cerda, S.R. , Ji, Y. , Burd, I. , Wang, G. , … & Wang, X. (2019). Preterm birth subtypes, placental pathology findings, and risk of neurodevelopmental disabilities during childhood. Placenta, 83, 17–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ravikumar, G. , Mascarenhas, D. , Suman Rao, P.N. , & Crasta, J. (2020). Fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM): Diagnostic implications and clinical associations. The Journal of Maternal‐Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 35, 4526–4533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Redline, R.W. (2008). Placental pathology: A systematic approach with clinical correlations. Placenta, 29, 86–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Redline, R.W. (2015). Classification of placental lesions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 213(4 Suppl), S21–S28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Redline, R.W. (2022). Placental pathology: Pathways leading to or associated with perinatal brain injury in experimental neurology, special issue: Placental mediated mechanisms of perinatal brain injury. Experimental Neurology, 347, 113917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Redline, R.W. , Ariel, I. , Baergen, R.N. , Desa, D.J. , Kraus, F.T. , Roberts, D.J. , & Sander, C.M. (2004a). Fetal vascular obstructive lesions: Nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, 7(5), 443–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Redline, R.W. , Boyd, T. , Campbell, V. , Hyde, S. , Kaplan, C. , Khong, T.Y. , … & Perinatal Section, Maternal Vascular Underperfusion Nosology Committee . (2004b). Maternal vascular underperfusion: Nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, 7(3), 237–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Redline, R.W. , Minich, N. , Taylor, H.G. , & Hack, M. (2007). Placental lesions as predictors of cerebral palsy and abnormal neurocognitive function at school age in extremely low birth weight infants (<1 kg). Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, 10, 282–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Redline, R.W. , & Ravishankar, S. (2018). Fetal vascular malperfusion, an update. APMIS, 126(7), 561–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Redline, R.W. , Ravishankar, S. , Bagby, C.M. , Saab, S.T. , & Zarei, S. (2021). Four major patterns of placental injury: A stepwise guide for understanding and implementing the 2016 Amsterdam consensus. Modern Pathology, 34, 1074–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Roescher, A.M. , Timmer, A. , Erwich, J.J. , & Bos, A.F. (2014). Placental pathology, perinatal death, neonatal outcome, and neurological development: A systematic review. PLoS One, 9, e89419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Roescher, A.M. , Timmer, A. , Hitzert, M.M. , de Vries, N.K.S. , Verhagen, E.A. , Erwich, J.J.H.M. , & Bos, A.F. (2014). Placental pathology and neurological morbidity in preterm infants during the first two weeks after birth. Early Human Development, 90, 21–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sallout, B. , & Mark, W. (2003). The fetal origin of adult diseases. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 23, 555–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Savchev, S. , Sanz‐Cortes, M. , Cruz‐Martinez, R. , Arranz, A. , Botet, F. , Gratacos, E. , & Figueras, F. (2013). Neurodevelopmental outcome of full‐term small‐for‐gestational‐age infants with normal placental function. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 42, 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sotiros, A. , Thornhill, D. , Post, M.D. , Winn, V.D. , & Armstrong, J. (2021). Inflammatory cytokines, placental pathology, and neurological outcomes in infants born to preterm preeclamptic mothers. PLoS One, 16, e0260094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Soullane, S. , Spence, A.R. , & Abenhaim, H.A. (2022). Association of placental pathology and gross morphology with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 15(3), 531–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Spinillo, A. , Dominoni, M. , Caporali, C. , Olivieri, I. , La Piana, R. , Longo, S. , … & Gardella, B. (2021). Placental histological features and neurodevelopmental outcomes at two years in very‐low‐birth‐weight infants. Pediatric Neurology, 120, 63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Spinillo, A. , Dominoni, M. , Mas, F.D. , Cesari, S. , Fiandrino, G. , & Gardella, B. (2023). Placental fetal vascular malperfusion, neonatal neurologic morbidity, and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 229, 632–640.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Straughen, J.K. , Misra, D.P. , Divine, G. , Shah, R. , Perez, G. , VanHorn, S. , … & Salafia, C.M. (2017). The association between placental histopathology and autism spectrum disorder. Placenta, 57, 183–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ueda, M. , Tsuchiya, K.J. , Yaguchi, C. , Furuta‐Isomura, N. , Horikoshi, Y. , Matsumoto, M. , … & Itoh, H. (2022). Placental pathology predicts infantile neurodevelopment. Scientific Reports, 12, 2578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, Z. (2010). Vascular biology of the placenta. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yallapragada, S.G. , Mestan, K.K. , & Ernst, L.M. (2016). The placenta as a diagnostic tool for the neonatologist. NeoReviews, 17, e131. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ylijoki, M.K. , Ekholm, E. , Ekblad, M. , & Lehtonen, L. (2019). Prenatal risk factors for adverse developmental outcome in preterm infants—Systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao, J. , & Xia, L. (2022). Association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and risk of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the offspring: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hypertension in Pregnancy, 41, 149–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Search strategy on 01.11.2023.

Table S2. Grey literature search.

Table S3. Placental Microscopic vascular pathology classifications.

Table S4. Individual publications bias quality and confounders assessment.

JCPP-66-1606-s001.docx (81.2KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this review are available in the published article and its online supplementary material.


Articles from Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES