Skip to main content
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2025 Sep 12;262:305–320. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.262.159097

Sedum shunhuangense (Crassulaceae), a new species from Hunan, China

Zi-Lin Feng 1, Xiao-Wen Liao 1, Du Deng 2, Long-Ping Tang 3, Shi-Yong Meng 4,, Lei Wu 1,
PMCID: PMC12449692  PMID: 40979455

Abstract

We describe and illustrate Sedum shunhuangense, a new species from Hunan, China. The species is morphologically similar to S. alfredii and S. yangjifengensis but differs in having subequal sepals, papillate seeds, and alternate leaves with caducous lower leaves during flowering. Phylogenetic reconstruction strongly supports two accessions of S. shunhuangense as monophyletic and sister to S. lipingense and S. wilsonii. The species has an estimated wild population of 200 individuals and is assessed as Endangered (EN) under IUCN criteria.

Key words: Hunan Province, molecular phylogenetics, morphology, new species, Sedum

Introduction

The Crassulaceae is the most species-rich family within the order Saxifragales and is characterized by succulent leaves and the unique Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) photosynthetic pathway (Chang et al. 2021). Sedum Linnaeus is a significant genus within the Crassulaceae, comprising approximately 470 species, predominantly occurring in the Northern Hemisphere, with a few species dispersed to Africa and South America in the Southern Hemisphere (Fu and Ohba 2001; ’t Hart and Bleij 2003; Thiede and Eggli 2007). However, Sedum is taxonomically challenging, with molecular phylogenetic studies revealing its highly polyphyletic nature (Carrillo-Reyes et al. 2009; Mort et al. 2010; Messerschmid et al. 2020). Specifically, Sedum species are dispersed across multiple clades in phylogenetic trees, with some occupying basal positions, indicating both a complex evolutionary history and the inadequacy of traditional morphological classification systems (Mort et al. 2001; Gontcharova et al. 2006). Recently, Messerschmid et al. (2020) proposed merging 14 previously independent genera into Sedum, as phylogenetic and morphological evidence demonstrated that these genera lacked clear monophyletic relationships and could not be distinguished by stable diagnostic characters. Intraspecific phenotypic plasticity and adaptive radiation further complicate Sedum taxonomy. For example, transplant experiments of S. yangjifengensis Z. W. Zhu, X. G. Le, L. F. Li, S. P. Chen & B. Chen (Zhu et al. 2023) revealed substantial morphological variation in flower stem numbers (ranging from solitary to hundreds per plant) under comparable climatic conditions. Similarly, nrITS and cpDNA lineage analyses of Taiwanese Sedum plants confirmed two independent migration lineages originating from Japan and mainland East Asia, each exhibiting parallel speciation (Ito et al. 2017). These findings, combined with frequent intergeneric hybridization in Crassulaceae (Uhl 1961), suggest that geographic isolation and ecological pressures may drive interspecific gene flow in Sedum, thereby blurring species boundaries. Although new species continue to be discovered (Wang and Xiong 2019; Ito et al. 2020; Zou et al. 2020, 2025; Huang et al. 2023; Chai et al. 2024), two taxonomic challenges persist: (1) specimen preparation of succulent tissues often distorts morphological structures (Meng et al. 2023), and (2) convergent evolution in vegetative and reproductive organs (Nikulin et al. 2016) complicates phenotypic delimitation among sympatric congeners. Thus, integrating traditional morphology with molecular phylogenetics is essential to resolve the taxonomic chaos within Sedum.

The Hunan Dong’an Shunhuang Mountain National Nature Reserve, located in the mid-section of the Yuechengling tectonic belt on the northwestern flank of the Nanling Mountains, lies within the biogeographic transition zone between the eastern margin of the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau and the Jiangnan Hills. Its extensive mountainous terrain forms a unique ecotone blending features of the Nanling Montane ecosystem, the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, and subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests. The complex topography generates distinct vertical climatic zonation, resulting in a flora marked by transitional and intermixed elements. This makes the reserve a critical yet understudied region for subtropical plant biogeography in China (Li 2020).

During a botanical survey in July 2024 at the reserve, a research team from Central South University of Forestry and Technology discovered two populations of an unknown Sedum taxon on a wet stone wall at an elevation of 650–1000 m in the core zone. This species exhibits sessile or subsessile flowers, carpels that are fused at the base, and awn-like arrangements at maturity. Its follicles are shallowly sac-shaped ventrally, aligning it morphologically with S. sect. Aizoon. Based on field observations and detailed morphological comparisons, we hypothesized that this plant might represent an undescribed species. In this study, we aimed to determine its phylogenetic position and taxonomic status through phylogenetic analysis and morphological comparisons. Integrated evidence from phylogenetic placement and morphological character comparisons establishes it as a new species.

Materials and methods

Morphological study

The morphology of the new species was investigated by systematically examining plant characteristics, integrating traditional herbarium research with modern digital resources. Specimens were examined using living collections and preserved materials from the herbaria CSFI, BNU, JIU, CCAU, and PE (abbreviations follow Thiers 2024). Digital resources, including the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (CVH) (https://www.cvh.ac.cn/) and the Plant Photo Bank of China (PPBC) (http://ppbc.iplant.cn/), were systematically reviewed to clarify morphological distinctions between the new species and its congeners.

Phylogenetic analysis

DNA of the new species was extracted and PCR-amplified following the protocol described by Zhang et al. (2015). ITS sequences of 66 Sedum samples were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), along with two sequences from Rosularia (Thiede and Eggli 2007; Messerschmid et al. 2020) (Crassulaceae) as the outgroup (GenBank accession numbers listed in Table 2). Two representative individuals from distinct populations were selected for molecular analysis: one from the Pangutang area of Shunhuang Mountain (X. W. Liao et al. SHS2154) and another from the Dalongjiang area of Shunhuang Mountain (Du Deng et al. SHS2155). Fresh leaves from these individuals were collected and preserved in silica gel within sealed plastic bags until use. Total DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1987). The ITS region was amplified using PCR following Huang et al. (2021). For phylogenetic reconstruction, ITS sequences were aligned using MAFFT v. 7 (Katoh and Standley 2013) and manually adjusted in PhyloSuite (Zhang et al. 2020). The optimal substitution model (SYM+I+G4) for maximum likelihood (ML) was determined using ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) with the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). ML trees were constructed with IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015; Hoang et al. 2018) using 1,000 replicates of the SH-approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT) and 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap (BS) replicates. Finally, the tree file was visualized using the online tool Interactive TVBOT (Xie et al. 2023).

Table 2.

Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of Sedum L. and Rosularia (DC.) Stapf (GenBank/NCBI), with taxon, accession, and voucher numbers, used for molecular analyses.

Taxon Accession numbers Voucher Herbaria
Outgroups
Rosularia alpestris PV589526 Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Scientific Expedition Team-Vegetation Research Group 12958 PE
Rosularia platyphylla KC988287 Chen,L.Y., Zhao,S.Y. and Wang,Q.F. s.n. HIB
Ingroups
Sedum actinocarpum LC229263 Ito1612 TI
Sedum alfredii FJ919948 WUK267838 WUK
Sedum alfredii FJ919952 IBK194562 IBK
Sedum alfredii AB930260 Kokubugata 17191 TI
Sedum alfredii FJ919946 WUK55069 WUK
Sedum alfredii AB930261 Kokubugata 17192 TI
Sedum alfredii AB930259 Kokubugata 17190 TI
Sedum alfredii FJ919950 IBK194563 IBK
Sedum alfredii FJ919953 WUK415208 WUK
Sedum alfredii FJ919947 WUK208434 WUK
Sedum alfredii FJ919949 IBK194564 IBK
Sedum alfredii FJ919951 IBK114924 IBK
Sedum arisanense LC229272 Ito1836 TNS
Sedum baileyi FJ919935 LBG0064555 LBG
Sedum bergeri AY352897 Unavailable Unavailable
Sedum brachyrinchum LC229274 Ito1359 TI
Sedum bulbiferum AB088628 L. Niu 1999 TI
Sedum danjoense LC260127 Ito3658 TNS
Sedum emarginatum LC530833 Ito1062 TNS
Sedum erici-magnusii LC229235 Ito2077 TNS
Sedum erythrospermum AB906473 Tsutsumi 1504 TI
Sedum formosanum AB906474 Kokubugata 11775 TI
Sedum hakonense AB930278 Ito 623 TI
Sedum hangzhouense LC229236 Ito2604 TNS
Sedum japonicum AB088617 S. Mayuzumi, C00030 TI
Sedum jiulungshanense LC229243 CMQ76 TNS
Sedum kawaraense LC731689 Japan HK 4164 TUS
Sedum kawaraense LC731691 Japan TI 7715 TUS
Sedum kiangnanense LC229244 TI1030 TNS
Sedum lineare AB088623 S. Mayuzumi, C00030 TI
Sedum lipingense MN150061 ZRB1479 IBK
Sedum lungtsuanense LC260131 Ito3563 TNS
Sedum makinoi AB088627 S. Mayuzumi, C00086 TI
Sedum mexicanum AB088621 S. Mayuzumi, C00001 TI
Sedum morrisonense AB906477 Kokubugata 10831 TI
Sedum nagasakianum LC229249 Ito2064 TNS
Sedum nanchuanense PV589525 SHS1174 PEY
Sedum nanlingense MN105947 MES06 IBK
Sedum nokoense AB906478 Kokubugata 10426 TI
Sedum oligospermum PV589524 Meng SY & Zhang JQ B087 PEY
Sedum onychopetalum KM111148 130523nj67 ACM
Sedum oreades AB088632 F. Miyamoto 9420140 TI
Sedum oryzifolium AB088618 S. Mayuzumi, C00016 TI
Sedum polytrichoides KM111142 130511hs21 ACM
Sedum rupifragum LC229254 Ito2070 TI
Sedum sarmentosum AB088624 S. Mayuzumi, C00008 TI
Sedum satumense LC229256 Ito2295 TI
Sedum sekiteiense LC229295 Ito1456 TI
Sedum shunhuangense PV589377 SHS2154 PEY
Sedum shunhuangense PV589376 SHS2155 PEY
Sedum spiralifolium KM111160 130525sc03 ACM
Sedum subtile AB088622 A. Shimizu 1999 TI
Sedum taiwanianum LC229297 Ito2770 TI
Sedum tarokoense LC229298 Ito2025 TI
Sedum tetractinum LC260135 Ito3623 TNS
Sedum tianmushanense LC229261 LP67 TNS
Sedum tosaense AB906488 Kokubugata 16834 TI
Sedum triactina AB088629 F. Miyamoto 9596091 TI
Sedum triangulosepalum LC229299 Ito2508 TNS
Sedum tricarpum LC229259 Ito2269 TI
Sedum trullipetalum AB088630 F. Miyamoto 9420132 TI
Sedum truncastigmum LC229306 Ito3254 TNS
Sedum wilsonii PV589527 Meng SY & Zhang LG 019 PEY
Sedum yabeanum AB088626 S. Mayuzumi, C00029 TI
Sedum yvesii PV589527 Meng SY & Zhang LG 015 PEY
Sedum zentaro-tashiroi AB088619 H. Ohba 1998 TI

Results

Morphological comparison

In terms of plant morphology, the new species is a dwarf herb that grows on moss-covered rocks. Leaves are clustered at the stem apex, lacking basal leaves. The individual leaf shape is highly variable—narrowly triangular to elliptic—but all leaves are distinctly petiolate (Fig. 1E). The inflorescence is a lax cyme; flowers are yellow; sepals are subequal and connate at the base; petals are narrowly triangular with a mucronate apex; nectary scales are broadly cuneate; fruit carpels are slightly divergent; and seeds have a testa with distinct papillate ornamentation (Fig. 1F–K).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Morphology of Sedum shunhuangense L.Wu & Z.L.Feng, sp. nov. A. Habitat; B. Whole plant; C. Habitat; D. Front view of infructescence; E. Leaf transition; F. Lateral view of infructescence; G. Sepals; H. Seed; I. Flowers; J. Oppositipetalous stamen; K. Nectar scale. Scale bars: 1 cm (B, D, E); 0.5 cm (F, I, J); 1 mm (G); 0.3 mm (H); 0.1 mm (K). A, C, D, I. Photographed by Xiao Wen Liao (Pangutang area, voucher SHS0908); B, E, F, G, H, J, K. Photographed by Zi Lin Feng (Niulongqi area, voucher SHS2154).

Although its overall plant habit and leaf shape show similarities to S. alfredii Hance and S. yangjifengensis (all three species lack basal leaves), S. shunhuangense possesses the following definitive diagnostic characters: (1) subequal sepals (vs. markedly unequal in both S. alfredii and S. yangjifengensis); (2) papillate seed coat (vs. smooth in S. alfredii); and (3) alternate leaves with caducous lower leaves during anthesis (vs. opposite leaves with persistent lower leaves in S. yangjifengensis). Several diagnostic traits distinguish between the three species (Table 1). Furthermore, we have compiled an identification key to the relevant species.

Table 1.

Morphological comparison of S. shunhuangense and its allied species.

Traits S. shunhuangense S. alfredii S. wilsonii S. yangjifengensis S. lipingense
Basal leaves Absent Absent Absent Absent Present
Cauline leaves Phyllotaxy Alternate Alternate Alternate Opposite or seldomly alternative on upper part Alternate, sometimes opposite on lateral flowering stem
Leaf state during flowering Lower leaves deciduous Lower leaves deciduous Lower leaves deciduous Lower leaves persistent Lower leaves persistent
Leaf shape Narrowly triangular to elliptic Linear-cuneate, spatulate, or obovate Elliptic to obovate-spatulate Suborbiculate or spatulate Spatulate-obovate to spatulate-oblanceolate
Spur at leaf base Absent Present Absent Present Present
Apex leaves clustered as inflorescence bracts Present Absent Absent Present Absent
Bract shape Elliptic or obovate-spatulate Linear-cuneate, spatulate, or obovate Linear-subspatulate Elliptic or obovate Obliquely oblanceolate
Floral characters Inflorescence Corymbiform cyme Corymbiform cyme Corymbiform cyme Corymbiform cyme Scorpioid cyme
Sepal shape Narrowly triangular Linear-spatulate Ovate Clavate or spatulate Lanceolate-oblong
Spur at sepal base Absent Present Absent Absent Present
Sepal size Subequal, 0.7–1.5 × 0.5–0.8 mm Unequal, 3–5 × 1–1.5 mm Unequal, 3.5–4.5 × 1.5–1.8 mm Unequal, 2.0–4.0 × 1.0–2.0 mm Subequal, 2.5–3 × 0.5–0.8 mm
Appendages Scale shape Broadly cuneate Spatulate-square Square-subspatulate Obtrapeziform Broadly cuneate
Seed coat ornamentation Papillate Smooth Smooth Papillate Papillate

S. shunhuangense also exhibits some morphological similarities to S. wilsonii and S. lipingense; however, S. shunhuangense is distinguished by its elliptic to obovate-spatulate inflorescence bracts and leaves at the stem apex clustered at anthesis, lack of a rosette, and papillate seed coat. In contrast, S. wilsonii possesses elliptic to obovate-spatulate leaves, with distal leaves clustering at anthesis, and smooth seeds, while S. lipingense develops a conspicuous rosette and features obliquely oblanceolate inflorescence bracts.

In summary, S. shunhuangense exhibits significant differences from S. alfredii, S. yangjifengensis, S. wilsonii, and S. lipingense in sepal morphology, seed coat ornamentation, leaf arrangement and persistence, leaf clustering habit, presence/absence of rosette, and bract shape (see Table 1 for details).

Molecular analysis

We conducted phylogenetic analyses based on ITS sequences from 57 species (69 accessions) (Fig. 2). The aligned matrix comprised 628 nucleotide sites, including 238 conserved sites (37.90%), 308 parsimony-uninformative sites (49.04%), and 435 variable sites. ITS sequence alignment revealed high homology between S. shunhuangense and other Sedum species, strongly supporting its generic placement. Phylogenetic topology demonstrated that S. shunhuangense forms a highly supported monophyletic clade (SH-aLRT = 100%, BS = 100%) and is sister to S. lipingense and S. wilsonii (SH-aLRT = 94%, BS = 99%). These taxa are further nested within a clade containing S. bulbiferum (SH-aLRT = 79%, BS = 88%), collectively forming a distinct evolutionary lineage. Molecular data also indicate a considerable genetic distance between S. shunhuangense and S. alfredii, with no direct phylogenetic affinity observed.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Maximum likelihood tree based on ITS sequences for Eastern Asian species of Sedum. Numbers near the nodes are the SHapproximate likelihood ratio test (left, SHaLRT) and ultrafast bootstrap (right, BS) support values. The new species is highlighted in bold.

Discussion

We integrated morphological and molecular phylogenetic evidence to robustly support the recognition of Sedum shunhuangense as a distinct species within the genus Sedum. Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS sequences (Fig. 2) revealed that S. shunhuangense is sister to S. lipingense and S. wilsonii (SH-aLRT = 94%, BS = 99%), yet it is morphologically and genetically distinct from these closely related species.

Phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences demonstrated that all S. alfredii samples from public databases (e.g., NCBI) form at least three independent monophyletic groups, indicating that S. alfredii represents a complex species complex requiring detailed systematic investigation. Notably, S. shunhuangense does not cluster with any S. alfredii clade but rather forms a sister lineage to the S. alfredii complex, with significant genetic divergence excluding intraspecific variation. This finding corroborates the complex evolutionary pattern characterized by the coexistence of phenotypic convergence and genetic divergence within the genus Sedum (Messerschmid et al. 2020).

Taxonomic treatment

. Sedum shunhuangense

L.Wu & Z.L.Feng sp. nov.

3D6528C3-1AF7-5DA3-930B-405B1DF727C3

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77369128-1

Figs 1, 3, 4

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Sedum shunhuangense L.Wu & Z.L.Feng, sp. nov. A. Fruiting plant; B. Flower; C. Immature fruit; D. Infructescence; E. Flower bud; F. Leaf. Drawn by Bi-Shan Li.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Holotype of Sedum shunhuangense SHS2154 (CSFI).

Type.

China • Hunan, Yongzhou Don’an County, Shunhuang Mountain, 668 m; 26°27'32.09"N, 111°03'49.34"E, 21 July 2024, X.W.Liao et al. SHS2154 (Holotype: CSFI!, Isotype: PEY!).

Diagnosis.

Phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 2) reveal that S. shunhuangense forms a sister group with S. lipingense and S. wilsonii. However, this species can be obviously distinguished from its allied species by the upper leaves aggregated at the flowering stem apex to form inflorescence bracts. Notably, S. shunhuangense shows distant phylogenetic relationships with S. alfredii and S. yangjifengensis; convergent evolution is observed in their phenotypic traits, particularly in inflorescence architecture and leaf morphology. However, it can be unequivocally distinguished by the following combination of characters (Table 1): (1) subequal sepals (vs. markedly unequal in both S. alfredii and S. yangjifengensis); (2) papillate seed coat (vs. smooth in S. alfredii); and (3) alternate leaves with caducous basal leaves during anthesis (vs. opposite leaves with persistent lower leaves in S. yangjifengensis).

Description.

Perennial succulent herb, glabrous throughout. Root system fibrous. Vegetative stems red, ascending, usually unbranched, 4.0–12.5 cm tall, 1.0–3.0 mm in diameter. Floral stems arising from apex or leaf axils of vegetative stems, basally unbranched, ascending, 0.6–4.5 cm tall, 0.5–1.5 mm in diameter. Leaves alternate, flat, slightly thickened; lacking basal leaves; lower leaves caducous at flowering, upper leaves 3–4 clustered at stem apex; leaf blade narrowly triangular to elliptic, spurless, petiolate, 0.9–2.5 cm long, 0.5–2.0 cm wide, apex obtuse, base attenuate, margin entire. Bracts leaf-like, borne at flower base, elliptic to obovate-spatulate, sessile, 4.0–8.0 mm long, 1.0–4.0 mm wide, apex acuminate, margin entire. Inflorescence lax corymbose-cymose, 2.5–6.0 cm wide; main axis reduced or absent, trichotomously branched from base into 3 subequal primary branches; each primary branch dichotomously divided apically into 2 secondary branches with scorpioid curvature, flowers alternate and secund, 1 per node. Flower sessile. Calyx 5-merous, subequal, basally connate, spurless, narrowly triangular, fleshy, flat, green, margin entire, 0.7–1.5 mm long, 0.5–0.8 mm wide, apex mucronate. Petals 5, free, pale yellow, narrowly triangular with a mucronate apex, 3.0–7.0 mm long, 1.2–1.5 mm wide, apex without appendages, base not constricted. Stamens 10, erect at anthesis, arranged in 2 whorls; antepetalous stamens 1.5–3.0 mm long, inserted slightly above petal base; antisepalous stamens 3.0–5.2 mm long; anthers black. Nectar scales 5, broadly cuneate, apex truncate, pale yellow. Style ca. 1.1 mm long. Carpels 3.0–4.0 mm long, erect, basally connate; ovules ca. 16 per locule. Follicles stellate-spreading at maturity, ca. 5.0 mm long, basally connate, ventrally carinate. Seeds numerous, ellipsoid, brown, 0.6 mm long, 0.3 mm wide; seed coat ornamentation papillate.

Geographical distribution and habitat.

Currently, S. shunhuangense is known only from damp limestone cliffs at elevations of 700–1000 m in the Shunhuangshan National Nature Reserve, Hunan Province, China (Fig. 5). This species usually lives on moss-covered rocks in secondary broad-leaved forests. Its deciduous lower leaves during anthesis may represent an adaptive strategy to optimize resource allocation in nutrient-poor rocky crevices, reflecting the genus’s phenotypic plasticity in heterogeneous habitats. The narrow distribution of this species suggests potential cryptic diversity or specialized adaptive mechanisms yet to be uncovered within the Nanling-Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau transitional zone. Therefore, it is urgent to carry out further investigations.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Distribution of Sedum shunhuangense L.Wu & Z.L.Feng in Hunan Province, China. Red circles indicate holotype and paratype localities.

Phenology.

Flowering from June to July; fruiting from August to October.

Etymology.

Sedum shunhuangense L.Wu & Z.L.Feng, with the epithet derived from its type locality, Shunhuang Mountain. The nomenclature follows the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Turland et al. 2018), with holotype and paratype specimens permanently deposited.

Chinese name (assigned here).

shùn huáng jǐng tiān (舜皇景天).

Conservation status.

Comprehensive surveys within the protected area confirm that S. shunhuangense is strictly confined to limestone habitats on Shunhuang Mountain, with a total area of occupancy (AOO) of approximately 0.028 km2 (significantly below the 10 km2 threshold). The current population comprises approximately 200 mature individuals. Although one subpopulation adjacent to a tourist trail faces habitat degradation risks, the spatially proximal distribution of both subpopulations does not meet the fragmentation criterion. Consequently, Standard B is inapplicable. Under Criterion D of the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2023) (50 < total mature individuals < 250), this species is assessed as Endangered (EN).

Additional specimens examined (paratypes).

ChinaHunan: Yongzhou County, Damiaokou Town, Pangutang, on moss-covered rocks in secondary broad-leaved forest, elevation 668 m, 26°24'03.71"N, 111°02'07.20"E, 13 July 2025, Xiao-Wen Liao & Lu Zhu, SHS0908 (PEY); • Yongzhou County, Damiaokou Town, Niulongqi, 26°27'32.09"N, 111°03'49.34"E, 21 July 2024, Xiao-Wen Liao & Lu Zhu, SHS2154 (CSFI).

Diagnostic key of S. shunhuangense and related species

1 Plants with conspicuous rosette leaves; bracts on inflorescence oblanceolate S. lipingense
Plants without rosette leaves; bracts on inflorescence spatulate or elliptic 2
2 Sepals spurred at base S. alfredii
Sepals not spurred at base 3
3 Leaves at stem apex not clustered at anthesis; seed coat smooth S. wilsonii
Leaves at stem apex clustered at anthesis; seed coat papillate 4
4 Sterile stems present; leaf base spurred; sepals distinctly unequal S. yangjifengensis
Sterile stems absent; leaf base not spurred; sepals subequal S. shunhuangense

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Sedum shunhuangense

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Du Deng, Xiao-Wen Liao, Zheng-Ren Li, Chao-Lin Yang, Xiong-Deng He, and Hong-Qiao Chen for their invaluable assistance during field investigations. We thank Director Long-Ping Tang, Section Chief Jun-Yun Tang, and the rangers of the Hunan Dong’an Shunhuangshan National Nature Reserve for their logistical support.

Citation

Feng Z-L, Liao X-W, Deng D, Tang L-P, Meng S-Y, Wu L (2025) Sedum shunhuangense (Crassulaceae), a new species from Hunan, China. PhytoKeys 262: 305–320. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.262.159097

Funding Statement

the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (grant No. 2025JJ50122)

Contributor Information

Shi-Yong Meng, Email: msy542702@pku.edu.cn.

Lei Wu, Email: wuleiibk@163.com.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Use of AI

No use of AI was reported.

Funding

This study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (grant No. 2025JJ50122).

Author contributions

Investigation: LPT, DD, XWL. Writing – original draft: ZLF. Writing – review and editing: LW, SYM.

Author ORCIDs

Zi-Lin Feng https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4283-5135

Xiao-Wen Liao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2652-2862

Du Deng https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5476-4098

Long-Ping Tang https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6590-1491

Shi-Yong Meng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6855-2990

Lei Wu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1451-7855

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  1. Carrillo-Reyes P, Sosa V, Mort ME. (2009) Molecular phylogeny of the Acre clade (Crassulaceae): Dealing with the lack of definitions for Echeveria and Sedum. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53: 267–276. 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chai M-L, Wu Y-M, Zhang Y, Pu J-B, Chen B, Xu Y-L, Li P. (2024) Sedum xunvense, a new species from Southeast China. Phytotaxa 644: 258–270. 10.11646/phytotaxa.644.4.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang H, Zhang L, Xie H, Liu J, Xi Z, Xu X. (2021) The conservation of chloroplast genome structure and improved resolution of infrafamilial relationships of Crassulaceae. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 631884. 10.3389/fpls.2021.631884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu KT, Ohba H. (2001) Sedum (Crassulaceae). In: Wu ZY, Peter HR. (Eds) Flora of China.Science Press, Beijing; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 202–270.
  6. Gontcharova SB, Artyukova EV, Gontcharov AA. (2006) Phylogenetic relationships among members of the subfamily Sedoideae (Crassulaceae) inferred from the ITS region sequences of nuclear rDNA. Russian Journal of Genetics 42: 654–661. 10.1134/S102279540606010X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 518–522. 10.1093/molbev/msx281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang YS, Kang N, Zhong XJ, Liao WB, Fan Q. (2021) A new species of Viola (Violaceae) from Guangdong Province, China. PhytoKeys 176: 67–76. 10.3897/phytokeys.176.65443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang Y-S, Meng K-K, Sun Y-Y, Chen Z-X, Fan Q. (2023) A new species of Sedum (Crassulaceae) from Mount Danxia in Guangdong, China. PhytoKeys 221: 117–129. 10.3897/phytokeys.221.97495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ito T, Yu C-C, Nakamura K, Chung K-F, Yang Q, Fu C-X, Qi Z-C, Kokubugata G. (2017) Unique parallel radiations of high-mountainous species of the genus Sedum (Crassulaceae) on the continental island of Taiwan. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 113: 9–22. 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ito T, Yu C-C, Yokota M, Kokubugata G. (2020) Sedum formosanum subsp. miyakojimense (Crassulaceae), a new subspecies from Miyakojima Island of the Ryukyu Islands, Japan. PhytoKeys 148: 51–70. 10.3897/phytokeys.148.48957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. IUCN (2023) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/redlistguidelines [Accessed 28 July 2023]
  13. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Katoh K, Standley DM. (2013) MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li X. (2020) Study on the Flora of Seed Plants in Dongan Shunhuang Mountain National Nature Reserve, Hunan Province. Master’s thesis. Central South University of Forestry and Technology, China. 10.27662/d.cnki.gznlc.2020.000105 [DOI]
  16. Meng S-Y, Chen B, Sodmergen (2023) Sedum danxiacola (Crassulaceae), an endemic new species from the Danxia landform, China. Kew Bulletin 78: 673–681. 10.1007/s12225-023-10122-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Messerschmid TFE, Klein JT, Kadereit G, Kadereit JW. (2020) Linnaeus’s folly phylogeny, evolution and classification of Sedum (Crassulaceae) and Crassulaceae subfamily Sempervivoideae. Taxon 69: 892–926. 10.1002/tax.12316 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mort ME, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Francisco‐Ortega J, Santos‐Guerra A. (2001) Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Crassulaceae inferred from matK sequence data. American Journal of Botany 88: 76–91. 10.2307/2657129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mort ME, O’Leary TR, Carrillo-Reyes P, Nowell T, Archibald JK, Randle CP. (2010) Phylogeny and evolution of Crassulaceae: Past, present, and future. Schumannia 6(Biodiversity & Ecology 3): 69–86.
  20. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. (2015) IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nikulin VYu, Gontcharova SB, Stephenson R, Gontcharov AA. (2016) Phylogenetic relationships between Sedum L. and related genera (Crassulaceae) based on ITS rDNA sequence comparisons. Flora: the Journal of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology = Infeksiyon Hastaliklari ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi 224: 218–229. 10.1016/j.flora.2016.08.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. ’t Hart H, Bleij B. (2003) Sedum. In: Eggli U. (Ed.) Illustrated handbook of succulent plants: Crassulaceae.Springer, Berlin, 235–332.
  23. Thiede J, Eggli U. (2007) Crassulaceae. In: Kubitzki K. (Ed.) Flowering Plants.Eudicots, vol. 382. Springer, Berlin, 3–5. 10.1007/978-3-540-32219-1_12 [DOI]
  24. Thiers B. (2024) Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ [Accessed 12 August 2024]
  25. Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber W-H, Li D-Z, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF [Eds] (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code). Regnum Vegetabile 159. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten. 10.12705/Code.2018 [DOI]
  26. Uhl CH. (1961) Some cytotaxonomic problems in the Crassulaceae. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 15: 375–377. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1961.tb03162.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Y-B, Xiong X-J. (2019) Sedum ichangensis, a new species of Crassulaceae from Hubei, China. PhytoKeys 132: 91–98. 10.3897/phytokeys.132.35428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Xie J, Chen Y, Cai G, Cai R, Hu Z, Wang H. (2023) Tree Visualization By One Table (tvBOT): a web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Research 51: W587–W592. 10.1093/nar/gkad359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang J, Meng S-Y, Rao G-Y. (2015) Two new species of Rhodiola (Crassulaceae) from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Phytotaxa 224: 159. 10.11646/phytotaxa.224.2.3 [DOI]
  30. Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT. (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20: 348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhu Z-W, Le X-G Li L-F, Chen S-P, Chen B. (2023) Sedum yangjifengensis (Crassulaceae), a new species from Jiangxi, China. Phytotaxa 607: 105–113. 10.11646/phytotaxa.607.1.9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zou C-Y, Meng S-Y, Lu Z-C, Liu Y. (2020) Sedum nanlingense (Crassulaceae), a newspecies from Guangxi, China. Phytotaxa 447: 176–184. 10.11646/phytotaxa.447.3.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zou C-Y, Meng T, Meng S-Y, Liu Y. (2025) A new species of Sedum (Crassulaceae, Saxifragineae) from Guangxi, China. PhytoKeys 252: 287–299. 10.3897/phytokeys.252.128011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Sedum shunhuangense

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.


Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES