Dear Editor,
Technological changes in targeted treatment, biosensors, and game design have presented intriguing next-generation plans for health and wellness. Among these developments, introducing DNA-based information in fitness applications is a radical shift that presents the possibility of tailoring interventions for genetic makeups. However, an equally revolutionary but less discussed and uncharted territory is gamified epigenetic fitness, using real-time genetic and environmental data to bring about positive and sustainable behavioral modifications as well as the expression of genes that affect long-term positive health changes.
The need for precision in fitness
Because the conventional approach to fitness has been generic–that is, the same for everyone–it has not been effective in addressing individual differences. Genetic factors influence the basal metabolic rate and the time taken to heal from an injury [1]. Recent studies have indicated that genetic variations influence metabolic efficiency, muscle composition, and injury recovery, necessitating personalized fitness strategies. For example, Leońska-Duniec highlighted how gene-environment interactions affect obesity risk and physical activity outcomes, demonstrating the potential for customized interventions [2]. Similarly, Singar et al. emphasized that genetic insights can refine dietary recommendations and enhance adherence to fitness programs [3]. Moreover, epigenetics refers to changes in gene activity that do not alter the DNA sequence but are influenced by lifestyle factors such as diet, exercise, and stress. Modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation, can enhance or suppress gene expression, directly affecting metabolism, endurance, and recovery. For example, it has been established that exercise can modify DNA methylation since it can reverse both age-related and disease-specific epigenetic marks [4]. DNA methylation, a key epigenetic modification, regulates gene expression by adding methyl groups to DNA and often silencing certain genes. Kaliman et al. demonstrated that endurance training can alter methylation patterns in genes associated with inflammation and energy metabolism, thereby promoting improved cardiovascular and metabolic health [4]. Similarly, histone modifications such as acetylation enhance chromatin accessibility and gene activation, facilitating muscle adaptation in response to exercise. Non-coding RNAs, another epigenetic mechanism, regulate gene expression by modulating protein synthesis, further influencing metabolic and stress responses in physically active individuals [5]. While genetic insights provide a foundation for personalized fitness, engagement remains a crucial challenge, as highlighted in Table 1, which illustrates the differences in current fitness applications as well as the proposed approaches. Gamification has emerged as a powerful tool that transforms personalized fitness from a passive experience into an interactive and motivational journey.
Table 1.
Comparison of current vs. Proposed approaches in fitness apps
Feature༏ Dimension | Traditional Fitness App | Gamified Epigenetic Fitness Platform |
---|---|---|
Personalization Basis | Generic: user-input goals, activity logs | Genetic + Epigenetic Data: DNA methylation, histone marks, non-coding RNA inform AI curve mapping [6,7] |
Behavioral Integration | Standard goal setting, reminders | Behavioral Science Elements: self-determination, social proof, habitloop design [6,7] |
AI Adaptation | Pre-set program recommendations | AI-driven pipeline: integrates biosensor + epigenetic + genomic signals in real time [6,8] |
Gamification Mechanics | Badges, step-tracking challenges | Adaptive gamification: dynamic missions, rewards, tailored to epigenetic feedback, segmented by user type [9] |
Data Security & Privacy | OAuth or local storage | Enhanced security: GDPR/HIPAA, encrypted genomic data, optional blockchain-enabled audit trails |
Accessibility & Equity | Freemium model; limited diversity considerations | Equity-focused design: subsidized access, language support, culturally tailored content |
Scientific Validation | Limited to app usage stats | Evidence-backed biomarkers: epigenetic clock shifts (e.g., DNA methylation clocks) [10] |
Outcome Scope | Weight loss, steps, basic health metrics | Epigenomic + Health Outcomes: molecular, physiological, and population-level NCD risk reductions [11] |
Table 1. Comparison of Traditional Fitness Apps vs. Gamified Epigenetic Fitness Platform.
Gamification: bridging science and engagement
Genetic data provide valuable health insights; however, without motivation, users may struggle to apply them. Gamification addresses this challenge by engaging users through fitness and rewards, and encouraging long-term commitment to healthy habits (Table 1). Many contemporary applications, such as Fitbit and WHOOP, incorporate game elements to achieve health-related objectives in the form of streaks, rankings, and incentives. However, these systems seldom contain individual components based on a person’s genes or epigenetic profiles. Through the use of gamified tasks that are specific to a person’s genome and epigenetic possibilities, fitness applications can help people achieve better health, not only through fun and enjoyment but also through sound scientific evidence [12, 13]. For instance, a user with a genetic profile of type 2 diabetes participates in dynamic challenges that incentivize compliance with exercise regimes that affect insulin sensitivity. However, to ensure that these gamified interventions remain truly personalized and adaptable, artificial intelligence (AI) plays an essential role in integrating real-time data and optimizing challenges based on individual progress.
The role of artificial intelligence in real-time personalization
Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role in gamified epigenetic fitness by analyzing genetic data, tracking real-time health metrics, and creating personalized challenges. This dynamic system ensures that workouts and health interventions evolve alongside an individual’s progress, thus maximizing long-term benefits. AI algorithms can connect a person’s genetics, biosignatures from wearable devices, and behavioral patterns to create personalized health challenges. Chopra et al. conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of AI-driven fitness applications on user adherence. Their findings revealed that real-time adjustments based on biometric data led to a 30% increase in workout consistency and motivation compared with generic fitness programs [14]. These results underscore the potential of AI to dynamically personalize fitness challenges, ensuring long-term behavioral changes. By integrating real-time biometric data, AI-driven systems can enhance both short-term fitness adaptations and long-term epigenetic changes, aligning with the broader goals of precision medicine. By seamlessly combining genetic predispositions, wearable biosignatures, and user behavior, AI-driven solutions can create a truly dynamic fitness experience. This approach not only enhances personal health but also aligns with broader public health goals, marking a significant shift toward epigenetic fitness as a comprehensive preventive strategy.
Gamified epigenetic fitness: a paradigm shift
Gamified epigenetic fitness extends beyond individual health and aligns with public health goals. With non-communicable diseases (NCDs) being responsible for over 41 million deaths annually, the WHO emphasizes the need for preventive strategies [15]. DNA-based fitness gamification is a promising solution for enabling personalized and proactive interventions. For example, efficient DNA-driven solutions can reach high-risk groups with individualized health issues and provide proactive, genetic, and epigenetically adjusted interventions. By synthesizing genetic predispositions, epigenetic modifications, and real-time wearable data, this approach personalizes the fitness challenges for individual users [16]. The use of AI ensures dynamic adjustments to these challenges, further enhancing engagement. The proposed framework is shown in Fig. 1 [16, 17], which depicts a dynamic, multi-layered system that connects wearable biosensing, gamification, baseline genetic risk, epigenetic modulation, AI personalization, and long-term health outcomes. Individual predispositions are established by genetic input (DNA), which is where the diagram starts. This baseline interacts with epigenetic processes (DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA), which mediate the long-term changes in gene expression and physiological adaptation brought about by environmental exposures and behaviors.
Fig. 1.
Heart rate, sleep patterns, stress levels, and other biometric data are continuously fed into an AI-driven personalization engine by wearable technology and biosensors. The engine then combines genomic and epigenetic signals to generate personalized health recommendations. AI models can adapt without changing their core architecture thanks to this real-time feedback, which serves as a learning loop akin to biological epigenetic responsiveness [18].
Personalized insights are then converted into captivating user experiences by gamification modules, which include challenges, levels, rewards, and social features. According to research, adding game components to health interventions, such as autonomy, social comparison, and feedback, can greatly increase motivation and behavior adherence [19]. By encouraging user participation, the system leads to behavioral changes that enhance metabolic and molecular health indicators.
A feedback loop is reinforced by the way that behavioral changes brought about by gamified challenges result in quantifiable changes in methylation, chromatin state, or non-coding RNA expression patterns. These changes can be monitored and utilized to further customize the gamified experience and health messaging.
Lastly, the framework seeks to improve public health by lowering the risk of NCDs at the population level through the use of epigenomic remodeling and scalable behavior change. Models in health promotion that combine behavior modification techniques with molecularly informed feedback to increase motivational power and long-term adherence support this comprehensive approach [19, 20].
This novel approach advances personalization and aligns with the broader goals of precision medicine and population health. By leveraging gamification, it bridges the gap between cutting-edge science and practical health outcomes, establishing precedents for future innovation.
Challenges and limitations
Although gamified epigenetic fitness presents a promising shift in personalized health, several challenges must be considered to ensure its successful implementation. The integration of real-time genetic and epigenetic data with wearable devices remains a complex task. Many current fitness applications rely on simplified biometric tracking (e.g., heart rate and steps), and incorporating epigenetic modifications would require continuous advancements in biosensors and AI-driven analytics. In addition, ensuring seamless interoperability across different health platforms and devices poses a significant challenge. The collection and use of genetic data raises concerns regarding user privacy, data security, and potential misuse. Without robust data protection measures, individuals may hesitate to share sensitive genomic information because of fears of unauthorized access, insurance discrimination, or employer biases. Ensuring strict adherence to privacy regulations, such as GDPR and HIPAA, is essential to mitigate these risks. DNA sequencing and epigenetic testing are relatively expensive, limiting accessibility to lower-income populations. Without affordable solutions, gamified epigenetic fitness may unintentionally widen health disparities instead of promoting inclusivity. Future advancements should focus on reducing the costs and ensuring equitable access to these technologies. An overreliance on gamification may also pose risks. While game mechanics can enhance motivation, excessive dependence on external rewards may lead to disengagement once incentives are removed. Striking the right balance between intrinsic motivation (e.g., long-term health benefits) and extrinsic rewards is crucial for sustaining user engagement.
Future directions
This paradigm shift calls for interdisciplinary collaboration among geneticists, behavioral scientists, and technology developers. Ethical considerations regarding genetic data usage must be prioritized to ensure privacy and equitable access. Furthermore, longitudinal research is critical to evaluate the sustained impact of epigenetic interventions and gamification on public health outcomes. Future research should focus on advancing wearable biosensors for real-time epigenetic monitoring, enhancing AI algorithms for more precise and adaptive fitness recommendations, and developing robust ethical and privacy frameworks to protect genetic data. Integrating gamified epigenetic fitness into public health systems could further optimize disease prevention strategies on a broader scale.
Conclusion
A revolutionary development in preventive medicine and personalized health is gamified epigenetic fitness. Enhancing user engagement, improving adherence to health interventions, and promoting long-term well-being can be achieved through the integration of artificial intelligence, game mechanics, and genetic and epigenetic insights. Gamified epigenetic fitness allows for dynamic and scientifically driven health optimization by customizing challenges based on a person’s biological profile, in contrast to traditional fitness applications that rely on generic metrics. This paradigm supports larger public health initiatives and goes beyond the advantages for individual health. Fitness interventions based on personalized DNA have the potential to reduce risk factors and support international initiatives to prevent disease. Additionally, real-time monitoring and intervention techniques will be improved over time by developments in wearable technology and AI-driven analytics, increasing the approach’s effectiveness and accessibility. However, overcoming significant obstacles is necessary to fully realize the potential of gamified epigenetic fitness. These obstacles include the long-term viability of gamification-based engagement, the cost and accessibility of epigenetic testing, and ethical concerns regarding the privacy of genetic data. To ensure that gamified interventions are both effective and inclusive, future research should concentrate on enhancing affordability, improving data security frameworks, and investigating the psychological effects of these interventions. As technology continues to evolve, gamified epigenetic fitness holds the potential to revolutionize preventive healthcare by shifting focus from reactive treatment to proactive, personalized wellness. This creative method encourages interdisciplinary cooperation between geneticists, behavioral scientists, and technology developers.
Acknowledgements
Not Applicable.
Abbreviations
- DNA
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- AI
Artificial intelligence
- WHO
World Health Organization
- NCDs
Non-communicable diseases
- GDPR
General Data Protection Regulation
- HIPAA
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Author contributions
All authors (M.F.A.; I.S)equally contributed to the preparation of this article.
Funding
This research did not receive any grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or nonprofit sectors.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Human or animal rights
This article is a letter to the editor that does not include human or animal samples directly.
Clinical trial number
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
MD. Faisal Ahmed and Izere Salomon have contributed equally.
References
- 1.Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):219–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leońska-Duniec A. Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of Associations between Obesity-Related Parameters and Physical Activity: A Scoping Review. Genes. 28;15(9):1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Singar S, Nagpal R, Arjmandi BH, Akhavan NS. Personalized Nutrition: Tailoring Dietary Recommendations through Genetic Insights. Nutrients. 16(16):2673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Kaliman P, Párrizas M, Lalanza JF, Camins A, Escorihuela RM, Pallàs M. Neurophysiological and epigenetic effects of physical exercise on the aging process. Ageing Res. Rev. 10(4):475–86. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1568163711000468 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Alamoudi AA. The role of Non-Coding RNAs in MYC-Mediated metabolic regulation: feedback loops and interactions. Non-Coding RNA. 2025;11(2):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yao J, Song D, Xiao T, Zhao J. Smartwatch-Based tailored gamification and user modeling for motivating physical exercise: experimental study with the maximum difference scaling segmentation method. JMIR Serious Games. 2025;13(1):e66793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kappen DL, Mirza-Babaei P, Nacke LE. Technology Facilitates Physical Activity Through Gamification: A Thematic Analysis of an 8-Week Study. Front Comput Sci [Internet]. 2020 Oct 22 [cited 2025 July 22];2. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computer-science/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2020.530309/full
- 8.Plaza-Diaz J, Izquierdo D, Torres-Martos Á, Baig AT, Aguilera CM, Ruiz-Ojeda FJ. Impact of physical activity and exercise on the epigenome in skeletal muscle and effects on systemic metabolism. Biomedicines. 2022;10(1):126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brooke RT, Kocher T, Zauner R, Gordevicius J, Milčiūtė M, Nowakowski M et al. Epigenetic Age Monitoring in Professional Soccer Players for Tracking Recovery and the Effects of Strenuous Exercise [Internet]. medRxiv; 2025 [cited 2025 July 22]. p. 2024.11.28.24317877. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.28.24317877v3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.You Y, Chen Y, Ding H, Liu Q, Wang R, Xu K, et al. Relationship between physical activity and DNA methylation-predicted epigenetic clocks. Npj Aging. 2025;11(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fernandes J, Arida RM, Gomez-Pinilla F. Physical exercise as an epigenetic modulator of brain plasticity and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;80:443–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Ozdamli F, Milrich F, Positive, and Negative Impacts of Gamification on the Fitness Industry. EJIHPE [Internet]. 2023 Aug 2 [cited 2025 Jan 16];13(8):1411–22. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/8/103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.WU Y, Kankanhalli A, Huang K. wei. Gamification in Fitness Apps: How Do Leaderboards Influence Exercise? In: ICIS 2015 Proceedings [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2015/proceedings/IShealth/14
- 14.Chopra K, Damodar R, Channabasappa SI, Patil H. Personalization of artificial intelligence driven fitness apps for senior citizens. J Infras Policy Dev [Internet]. 2024 Dec 30 [cited 2025 Jan 16];8(16):6917. Available from: https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/index.php/jipd/article/view/6917
- 15.Noncommunicable diseases [Internet]. World Health Organization. [cited 2025 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
- 16.Rasool M, Malik A, Naseer MI, Manan A, Ansari SA, Begum I, et al. The role of epigenetics in personalized medicine: challenges and opportunities. BMC Med Genom. 2015;8(1):S5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cho I, Kaplanidou K, Sato S. Gamified wearable fitness tracker for physical activity: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7017. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Youvan D. Epigenetic Analogies in Artificial Intelligence: Adaptive Mechanisms for Learning and Contextual Modulation. 2024.
- 19.Arampatzakis V, Sevetlidis V, Derri V, Raffi M, Pavlidis G. Towards reshaping children’s habits: vitalia’s AR-Gamified approach. Information. 2025;16(7):606.
- 20.McBride CM, Koehly LM. Imagining roles for epigenetics in health promotion research. J Behav Med. 2017;40(2):229–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.