Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Aug 22;17(8):e90730. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90730

Metastatic Paraganglioma With a Fatal Outcome Following Liver Biopsy: A Case Report

Isabel Hipólito-Reis 1,✉, Núria Jorge 1, Filipe Cruz 2, Sara Nogueira 3, José-Artur Paiva 1,4
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12450320  PMID: 40984916

Abstract

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors that may present as hormonally active or silent masses. While generally indolent, they may metastasize and lead to severe complications, particularly when biopsied or manipulated without prior diagnosis. We describe a 53-year-old woman with a history of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, admitted for investigation of constitutional symptoms and lytic vertebral lesions. Imaging revealed liver and bone metastases, a retroperitoneal mass, and adenopathy. A liver biopsy was performed, after which she developed hemorrhagic shock due to active hepatic bleeding. Despite successful embolization, she progressed to multiorgan failure, extensive intestinal ischemia, and death. Histological analysis revealed metastatic paraganglioma. This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges associated with occult, functionally active paraganglioma. Invasive procedures in undiagnosed neuroendocrine tumors may trigger life-threatening complications, especially in hormonally active lesions. A routine biochemical evaluation is recommended before biopsy, as early recognition of paraganglioma in retroperitoneal masses, even when asymptomatic, is essential to prevent fatal outcomes.

Keywords: catecholaminergic crisis, eus-guided liver biopsy, extra-adrenal paraganglioma, hemorrhagic shock, irreversible ischemia, metastatic paraganglioma, multiorgan system failure

Introduction

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors, with a prevalence between 1:2,500 and 1:6,500 [1]. These tumors arise from chromaffin cells, most commonly located in the adrenal medulla (pheochromocytomas) or extra-adrenal sites. Although many are benign, approximately 10-20% may metastasize, most often to bone, liver, lungs, or lymph nodes [2].

Functional paragangliomas can secrete catecholamines, leading to classic symptoms such as paroxysmal hypertension, tachycardia, diaphoresis, and weight loss. In contrast, non-functional tumors may remain clinically silent, delaying recognition until advanced disease or being discovered incidentally on imaging. Metastatic disease often presents with non-specific symptoms, including bone pain, constitutional features, or organ-specific dysfunction, which may overlap with more common conditions and contribute to diagnostic delay [3,4].

The differential diagnosis of metastatic paraganglioma includes other neuroendocrine tumors, adrenal cortical carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and metastatic lesions from primary lung or gastrointestinal malignancies [5]. The diagnosis is typically established by biochemical assays (plasma or urine metanephrines) combined with anatomical and functional imaging, such as CT/MRI and PET with specific radiotracers (e.g., 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, 18F-fluorodopa, and 68Ga-DOTATATE) [6]. Histological confirmation may be necessary in select cases, but biopsy is generally avoided due to the risk of catecholamine surge or hemorrhage [7].

Management of metastatic paraganglioma is challenging and often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Treatment options include surgical resection when feasible, radionuclide therapy (e.g., 131 I-MIBG or 177Lu-DOTATATE), external-beam radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and targeted agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors [8,9]. Despite these options, disease progression is common, and complications may arise from both tumor burden and catecholamine excess, including refractory hypertension, arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, or multiorgan dysfunction [10].

This case report describes a patient in whom a paraganglioma was not suspected prior to biopsy, with the diagnosis only established after a fatal post-biopsy course.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old woman, with a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 4 (moderately frail, some dependence for activities of daily living), with medical history of long-standing hypertension (on four antihypertensive agents), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, presented to the emergency department with complaints of persistent left lower back pain, anorexia, unintentional weight loss, and profuse night sweats over one month. She had no known drug allergies. Her cancer screening was up to date. These clinical features, particularly refractory hypertension and the new or worsening manifestation of diabetes mellitus, are classic indicators of catecholamine-secreting tumors and could support earlier biochemical investigation.

A recent lumbar CT scan had shown osteolytic vertebral lesions. Blood tests revealed acute kidney injury (serum creatinine = 3.24 mg/dL) and elevated liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase = 1825 U/L; alanine aminotransferase = 1547 U/L). A new thoracoabdominal-pelvic CT scan showed a heterogeneous retroperitoneal solid mass without extension to the pancreas or adrenal glands, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, and extensive hepatic and bone involvement, suggestive of metastases.

She was admitted for further investigation. Serum protein electrophoresis and tumor markers were unremarkable. On day six, an ultrasound-guided liver biopsy was performed without immediate complications.

Approximately four hours post-biopsy, the patient developed hypotension (94/50 mmHg), sinus tachycardia (170 bpm), and signs of peripheral hypoperfusion. An urgent CT angiogram revealed active bleeding at the liver biopsy site. She was transferred to a tertiary hospital for interventional radiology, where hepatic embolization was successfully performed, and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

On ICU arrival, she was hypotensive (80/67 mmHg), with metabolic acidosis (pH = 7.00), a lactate level of 13 mmol/L, and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 10. Her pupils were fixed and dilated (Figure 1). She was then intubated and mechanically ventilated. Her hemoglobin level was 7 g/dL, and her glucose level was 600 mg/dL. She received 1 g of tranexamic acid, three units of packed red blood cells, intravenous fluids, and bicarbonate. Blood gases after initial resuscitation showed some improvement (pH = 7.28, bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻) = 14 mmol/L).

Figure 1. Dilated pupils at presentation.

Figure 1

Over the following hours, she developed persistent high-grade fever despite triple antipyretic therapy, worsening renal and hepatic function, and required increasing doses of noradrenaline. Repeat CT (Figure 2) showed the previously described heterogeneous retroperitoneal mass, and additionally revealed hemoperitoneum without active bleeding, portal venous gas, extensive pneumatosis intestinalis (notably in the ileum), and numerous gas bubbles in mesenteric and ileocolic venous branches. Splenic and renal ischemia were also suspected.

Figure 2. Coronal, sagittal, and axial CT images in the portal venous phase.

Figure 2

Coronal (left), sagittal (center), and axial (right) portal venous phase CT images of the thoracoabdominopelvic region. The blue arrow identifies a heterogeneous retroperitoneal mass. The thin white arrow indicates intestinal pneumatosis.

General surgeons evaluated the patient and deemed the extent of intestinal ischemia unrecoverable. Given irreversible multiorgan failure, a decision was made to provide palliative care. The patient died approximately 48 hours after ICU admission.

Post-mortem histopathological analysis of the liver biopsy revealed the diagnosis of metastatic paraganglioma.

Discussion

Paragangliomas are often diagnosed late due to nonspecific symptoms or silent progression. Functional tumors may present earlier due to catecholamine secretion, but non-functional variants can remain undetected until metastatic spread or complications arise [4].

In this case, the retroperitoneal mass and bone metastases were suspicious for malignancy, but tumor markers were negative, and the misinterpretation of classic paraganglioma symptoms delayed suspicion. Importantly, liver biopsy in such tumors carries a high risk of bleeding and potentially a catecholaminergic crisis [11]. This patient developed hemorrhagic shock shortly after the biopsy, despite no immediate signs during the procedure.

The profound metabolic derangements, fixed mydriasis, and rapidly worsening multiorgan failure raise the possibility of a catecholamine surge, compounded by hemorrhage-induced hypoperfusion. Furthermore, extensive intestinal ischemia, gas in the portal circulation, and splenic/renal hypoperfusion confirmed irreversible shock.

Histological diagnosis of paraganglioma was only available post-mortem. This underscores the importance of early recognition. Imaging features of paragangliomas may include intense arterial enhancement, which shows hypervascularity and necrosis, particularly on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. When retroperitoneal or adrenal masses are detected, biochemical screening with plasma metanephrines should precede biopsy [10,12].

Conclusions

This case illustrates the serious consequences of unrecognized paraganglioma, particularly when invasive procedures are performed. In patients with retroperitoneal masses and lytic bone lesions, even in the absence of typical symptoms, paraganglioma should be considered in the differential diagnosis. We advocate for multidisciplinary pre-biopsy evaluation of retroperitoneal masses and routine screening for catecholamine excess in at-risk patients. Awareness of this rare but lethal complication may help prevent similar outcomes.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Isabel Hipólito-Reis, Núria Jorge, Filipe Cruz, Sara Nogueira, José-Artur Paiva

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Isabel Hipólito-Reis, Filipe Cruz, Sara Nogueira

Drafting of the manuscript:  Isabel Hipólito-Reis

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Núria Jorge, Filipe Cruz, Sara Nogueira, José-Artur Paiva

Supervision:  Núria Jorge

References

  • 1.Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: from epidemiology to clinical findings. Aygun N, Uludag M. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020;54:159–168. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2020.18794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: understanding the complexities of the genetic background. Fishbein L, Nathanson KL. Cancer Genet. 2012;205:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas—current management. Brewczyński A, Kolasińska-Ćwikła A, Jabłońska B, Wyrwicz L. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17061029. Cancers (Basel) 2025;17:1029. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clinical risk factors for malignancy and overall survival in patients with pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas: primary tumor size and primary tumor location as prognostic indicators. Ayala-Ramirez M, Feng L, Johnson MM, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:717–725. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Shah MH, Goldner WS, Benson AB, et al. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:839–868. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.European Association of Nuclear Medicine Practice Guideline/Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Procedure Standard 2019 for radionuclide imaging of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Taïeb D, Hicks RJ, Hindié E, et al. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-019-04398-1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2112–2137. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04398-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. Mete O, Asa SL, Gill AJ, Kimura N, de Krijger RR, Tischler A. Endocr Pathol. 2022;33:90–114. doi: 10.1007/s12022-022-09704-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Management of metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: when and what. Sukrithan V, Perez K, Pandit-Taskar N, Jimenez C. Curr Probl Cancer. 2024;51:101116. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Risk of complications after core needle biopsy in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Zhang L, Åkerström T, Mollazadegan K, Beuschlein F, Pacak K, Skogseid B, Crona J. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2023;30:0. doi: 10.1530/ERC-22-0354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:1915–1942. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Subclinical phaeochromocytoma. Mannelli M, Lenders JW, Pacak K, Parenti G, Eisenhofer G. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26:507–515. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2011.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pheochromocytoma: recommendations for clinical practice from the First International Symposium. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ahlman H, et al. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3:92–102. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES