ABSTRACT
Fagus hayatae Palib. ex Hayata, an endangered East Asian paleoendemic species, dominates in Sichuan's Micang Mountain while persisting in fragmented populations across Taiwan and mainland China. Nevertheless, niche differentiation and adaptive strategies between this species and its close congener (F. engleriana) remain poorly understood. Leaf functional traits—key indicators of plant resource‐use strategies—reveal ecological adaptations through their interrelationships and environmental responses. Here, we examined interspecific variation in leaf functional traits among F. hayatae, F. engleriana, and co‐dominant tree species, and analyzed the trait variation in F. hayatae with respect to elevation to elucidate climate adaptation mechanisms (Micang Mountain Nature Reserve, China). F. hayatae and F. engleriana exhibited low niche overlap as community dominants. Compared to associated dominants, F. hayatae displayed higher leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), leaf carbon content (LCC), and leaf phosphorus content (LPC), alongside smaller stomata with lower density. Conversely, F. engleriana manifested stronger resource‐acquisition traits: larger leaf width (LW), leaf area (LA), SLA, LCC, higher leaf nitrogen content (LNC), and greater stomatal density, yet lower LPC. Direct comparison revealed that F. hayatae possesses larger but sparser stomata and reduced resource‐acquisition capacity relative to F. engleriana, evidenced by lower LL, LW, LA, SLA, LCC, and LNC. Elevation significantly modulated F. hayatae's leaf traits. At lower elevations, increased LA and SLA indicated acquisitive tendencies, whereas higher elevations favored conservative strategies: reduced LA, SLA, stomatal area (SA), and LPC. This underscores F. hayatae's superior phenotypic plasticity and reliance on defense‐oriented adaptations compared to sympatric F. engleriana. Critically, mid‐elevations supported optimal performance via coordinated stress‐tolerance traits. These findings highlight the priority of protecting mid‐elevation habitats where F. hayatae achieves peak fitness, and the need for proactive habitat preservation due to its conservative strategy, which entails slower post‐disturbance recovery.
Keywords: elevational adaptation, Fagus hayatae, leaf functional traits, sympatric tree species
This study reveals how the endangered Fraxinus hayatae diverges from F. engleriana via stress‐tolerant leaf traits (e.g., stomatal morphology, resource allocation). Using elevational gradients in Micang Mountain, we demonstrate F. hayatae's niche partitioning through coordinated plasticity in SLA, nutrients, and leaf anatomy. These evolutionary strategies inform conservation of paleoendemics under climate change.

1. Introduction
Leaf functional traits—morphological and physiological adaptations to environmental conditions—serve as key indicators of plant ecological strategies along the Leaf Economics Spectrum (LES), a global axis ranging from acquisitive (fast resource capture) to conservative (stress‐tolerant) strategies (Wright et al. 2004). Comparative analysis of functional traits between closely related and sympatric species holds significant ecological implications (Li et al. 2025). These differences not only elucidate species coexistence mechanisms by revealing how functional trait divergence reduces competition and promotes niche complementarity, but also enable the assessment of different species' future adaptive potential through key trait comparisons positioned on the LES continuum, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for survival strategies and conservation measures (Holden and Cahill Jr. 2024). As the most environmentally responsive plant organs, leaves dynamically adjust their traits within this spectrum to enhance survival and performance across habitats (Chaturvedi et al. 2011). Critical LES trade‐offs include: acquisitive traits (e.g., high SLA, nutrient‐rich leaves) enhancing growth under resource abundance versus conservative traits (e.g., high LDMC, structurally reinforced tissues) ensuring persistence under stress. Studying these adaptations can contribute to revealing plant survival mechanisms and predicting their responses to environmental change across elevation gradients, where abiotic filters drive trait shifts along the LES.
Elevation gradients create natural environmental clines, with distinct variations in light, temperature, and precipitation, making them ideal for studying plant trait‐environment relationships. The “space‐for‐time substitution” approach leverages these gradients to predict how plant functional traits may respond to climate warming—a key methodology in global change biology (Walther et al. 2002; Kim and Donohue 2013). Existing research demonstrates species‐specific elevation adaptations: Rhododendron species exhibit differential thermal sensitivity in functional traits (Zhang et al. 2025; Pandey et al. 2024). Castanopsis sclerophylla showed altitude‐dependent trait shifts for cold adaptation (Liu et al. 2020). Such elevation‐mediated studies enable projections of plant performance under future climates, informing conservation strategies.
Fagus hayatae Palib. ex Hayata, an endemic deciduous tree to China, is sparsely distributed in mountainous areas of Sichuan, Hubei, Zhejiang, and northern Taiwan. As a National Grade II Protected Species, it faces habitat fragmentation and critically impaired regeneration, contrasting sharply with the stable sympatric congener F. engleriana. Given that leaf functional traits directly influence carbon assimilation and resource allocation—key determinants of seedling establishment and growth (Poorter et al. 2010)—this divergence may underlie their contrasting regeneration success (Li, Dong, et al. 2016; Li, Wu, et al. 2016). According to niche theory, functional trait divergence reduces interspecific competition by decreasing niche overlap, thereby enabling coexistence (Kraft et al. 2015). Consequently, the contrasting regeneration capacities of F. hayatae and F. engleriana may arise from divergent niche occupation—manifested through leaf trait differentiation. Furthermore, as climate warming further forces its distribution shift upward (Guo et al. 2014). However, the differences in leaf functional traits among F. hayatae, F. engleriana, and their sympatric species remain unclear, as do its elevational adaptation strategies.
This study compared leaf functional traits among Fagus hayatae, Fagus engleriana, and their dominant co‐occurring tree species, with a particular focus on the elevational adaptation strategies of F. hayatae. Our aims were to answer two questions: (i) Do interspecific differences in leaf functional traits underlie niche partitioning (quantified by niche breadth/overlap) and thereby drive divergent regeneration capacities between F. hayatae and F. engleriana ? (ii) What are the differences in leaf functional traits of F. hayatae at different altitudes, and are these differences the fundamental reasons for its varying adaptability to altitude?
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
The investigation was conducted in Micang Mountain National Nature Reserve (32°29′–32°41′ N, 106°24′–106°39′ E), a biodiversity hotspot located along the subtropical‐temperate ecotone of the Micang Mountain–Daba Mountains in Sichuan Province. This region harbors mainland China's largest and first documented F. hayatae population (Chen 2014), which exhibits critical demographic vulnerabilities, including impaired regeneration and population collapse (Li, Dong, et al. 2016; Li, Wu, et al. 2016). Notably, this decline contrasts sharply with the stable populations of its sympatric congener, F. engleriana. Furthermore, as global warming degrades the cool‐humid habitats preferred by F. hayatae, larger individuals increasingly persist at higher elevations (Guo et al. 2014). This well‐preserved, expansive population provides an ideal system for comparative functional ecology studies. Characterized by a subtropical monsoon climate (mean annual temperature: 13.5°C–16.5°C; precipitation: 1100–1400 mm), the reserve exhibits pronounced altitudinal gradients that create distinct microclimatic conditions under the dual influence of southwest and southeast monsoons (Ying 1994; Liu et al. 2003). These elevational variations, combined with the sympatric distribution of two species, provide an exceptional natural laboratory for investigating leaf trait adaptations and assessing climate change impacts on relict tree species.
The F. hayatae forest forms a deciduous broadleaf community dominated by F. hayatae in the canopy, with associates including Carpinus turczaninowii and Tsuga chinensis. The understory features Indocalamus tessellatus and Fargesia spathacea thickets, while the herb layer contains characteristic species like Carex tristachya and Tricyrtis macropoda. The F. engleriana community similarly exhibits deciduous broadleaf dominance, with Cornus kousa subsp. chinensis and Quercus shennongii as main canopy associates. Fargesia spathacea and Arundinaria fargesii dominate the understory, accompanied by herbs such as Rubia ovatifolia.
2.2. Field Survey and Sampling
During July 2022, we implemented a stratified sampling design to study F. hayatae and F. engleriana communities in the Reserve (Figure 1). To analyze interspecific dynamics, six 100 × 100 m primary plots—three per species—were established in minimally disturbed F. hayatae and F. engleriana stands. Each primary plot contained five systematically arranged 20 × 20 m subplots (30 subplots total) for canopy layer assessment.
FIGURE 1.

Schematic diagram of sample plot location. (a) geographical location of Micang Mountain Nature Reserve; (b) distribution of sampling sites for Fagus hayatae and Fagus engleriana; (c) distribution map of F. hayatae sampling sites at different altitudes.
To quantify elevational adaptation of F. hayatae, three discrete elevation bands were targeted based on documented microhabitat gradients (Badraghi et al. 2021; Wang, He, et al. 2016; Wang, Yu, et al. 2016): Low elevation (1654–1674 m), Mid elevation (1776–1790 m), and High elevation (1907–1931 m). One primary plot per band (total nine plots) was positioned on uniform slope aspects to isolate elevation effects from confounding factors (e.g., solar radiation, soil processes). This resulted in 45 subplots (5 per primary plot) systematically arranged within the elevation transect.
All plots were georeferenced with topographic parameters (slope, aspect) recorded. Following Xiang et al. (2015), every tree ≥ 5 cm DBH (F. hayatae, F. engleriana, and associates) was measured. Tree coordinates, slope gradient, aspect, height, and DBH were documented.
2.3. Sample Collection
Following quadrat analysis to determine species importance values, a standardized leaf sampling protocol was implemented for dominant Fagus species (F. hayatae and F. engleriana) and associated species with > 5% importance value (He et al. 2021). For each species, three healthy, similarly sized individual trees were randomly selected. From each tree, 3 outer‐canopy branches were collected using pole pruners, yielding 20–30 mature, intact, and healthy leaves per tree. Samples were immediately labeled and placed in resealable plastic bags. From the leaves collected per tree, nine intact leaves were selected for morphology and stomatal measurements (Table 1). These nine leaves were individually weighed for fresh weight (accuracy ±0.0001 g, Model CN‐FDC1003) and placed into separate, labeled tea bags. The remaining leaves were pooled and placed into 1–2 labeled tea bags per tree for subsequent measurement of leaf economic traits. All samples (individual and pooled tea bags) were preserved using rapid silica gel desiccation at room temperature and subsequently transported to the laboratory.
TABLE 1.
Nineteen functional traits and descriptions.
| Trait (abbreviation, unit) | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| Morphological traits | Leaf length (LL, mm) | Distance from leaf base to apex; affects light interception area |
| Leaf width (LW, mm) | Maximum leaf lamina width; influences light capture efficiency and gas diffusion resistance | |
| Leaf length:width ratio (LL/LW) | Leaf length divided by width; indicates shape and affects gas diffusion resistance/heat dissipation | |
| Leaf perimeter (LC, mm) | Total edge length of leaf lamina; reflects size and shape complexity | |
| Leaf Area (LA, cm2) | Surface area of a single leaf; determines light interception capacity | |
| Leaf thickness (LT, mm) | Vertical distance between epidermises; indicates structural tissue investment; correlates with stress tolerance and longevity | |
| Stomatal Traits | Stomatal length (SL, μm) | Maximum pore length; affects maximum stomatal conductance and closure kinetics |
| Stomatal width (SW, μm) | Maximum pore width; influences maximum aperture and gas diffusion conductance | |
| Stomatal L:W ratio (SL/SW) | Stomatal length divided by width; reflects morphology and responsiveness | |
| Stomatal perimeter (SC, μm) | Total border length of stomatal pore; used in conductance models | |
| Stomatal area (SA, μm2) | Surface area of open pore; directly determines maximum gas diffusion conductance (CO2/H2O) | |
| Stomatal density (SD, no./mm2) | Number per unit leaf area; high density often adapts to high light/dry conditions for finer regulation | |
| Economic Traits | Leaf dry matter content (LDMC, mg/g) | Dry mass/water‐saturated fresh mass; core LES trait. High = dense tissue, conservative strategy, long lifespan, high stress tolerance, high potential WUE |
| Specific leaf area (SLA, cm2/g) | Leaf area/dry mass; core LES trait. High = fast‐return strategy (low investment, high photosynthetic area), Low = slow‐return strategy (high investment, slow turnover) | |
| Leaf carbon content (LCC, mg/g) | Mass fraction of C in dry matter; mainly structural carbon (cellulose/lignin); relates to defense, support & decomposition | |
| Leaf nitrogen content (LNC, mg/g) | Mass fraction of N in dry matter; core LES trait, reflects photosynthetic enzymes/chlorophyll; indicates photosynthetic capacity & growth potential | |
| Leaf phosphorus content (LPC, mg/g) | Mass fraction of P in dry matter; indicates nucleic acids/phospholipids/ATP; reflects metabolic activity & growth (often limiting in low‐P environments) | |
| Carbon:nitrogen ratio (C:N) | Leaf C content/N content; indicates tissue quality, decomposition rate & N use efficiency; high = conservative nutrient strategy | |
| Nitrogen:phosphorus ratio (N:P) | Leaf N content/P content; key nutrient limitation indicator; high N:P suggests P limitation, low N:P suggests N limitation; reflects nutritional balance | |
2.4. Measurement of Leaf Functional Traits
2.4.1. Morphological Traits
For the nine tea‐bag leaves per tree, the length (LL), width (LW), length‐to‐width ratio (LL/LW), perimeter (LC), and area (LA) of each leaf were measured using the Wanshen LA‐S series universal plant image analysis system (Microtek scanMaker i800plus). Leaf thickness (LT) was measured at three points (front, middle, and back) on the leaf, avoiding the midrib and secondary veins, using a digital vernier caliper with a precision of 0.01 mm. Each measurement was repeated three times, and the average value was taken as the LT.
2.4.2. Stomatal Traits
The same nine tea‐bag leaves per tree were used for stomatal analysis. Leaves from each sample tree were cut into 1 × 1 cm pieces (excluding the ends for gymnosperms) at the midpoint. A dissociation solution was prepared by mixing equal parts of 20% nitric acid and 20% potassium dichromate. The leaf pieces were immersed in the dissociation solution for 24–48 h, depending on the plant species. After dissociation, the samples were washed in distilled water, the lower epidermis was carefully removed with tweezers, and the samples were fixed in FAA solution to prepare slides. The length (SL), width (SW), length‐to‐width ratio (SL/SW), perimeter (SC), area (SA), and density (SD) of stomata were measured using Motic Images Advanced 3.2 software.
Quality control: (1) SD: mean of three non‐overlapping fields/slide; (2) Morphology: ≥ 10 intact stomata/slide; (3) Validation: 15% slides (species‐stratified) re‐measured by a second observer. Relative errors (SD/SA) < 5%.
2.4.3. Economic Traits
For the nine tea‐bag leaves per tree, were oven‐dried to constant weight at 80°C (Precision Oven, Model GZX‐9030MBE) and weighed using an analytical balance (accuracy ±0.0001 g, Model CN‐FDC1003) to measure leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and specific leaf area (SLA). The remaining dried leaves (11–21 per tree) were ground into a fine powder, sieved through an 80‐mesh screen to remove impurities, and analyzed for leaf carbon (LCC) and nitrogen (LNC) content using a VARIO Macro CN elemental analyzer. Leaf phosphorus content (LPC) was determined by digesting the samples with H2SO4‐H2O2, followed by colorimetric analysis at 700 nm using a UV spectrophotometer (UV‐4802) based on the molybdenum‐antimony resistance method and a regression equation.
2.5. Data Stratification and Analysis
2.5.1. Community Characteristic Analysis
Importance Value (IV) Calculation:
Following the methods of previous studies (He et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2022), this study selected associated species with an IV greater than 5% as the basis for comparing leaf functional traits of dominant species. The IV of tree layer species was calculated using the following formula:
| (1) |
where IV is the importance value, RF is the relative frequency, RA is the relative abundance, and RD is the relative density.
2.5.2. Niche Breadth
Given the uncertainty of resource availability and abundance within plots (Chen et al. 2020), this study used the Shannon‐Wiener niche breadth (BS) (Colwell and Futuyma 1971) and Levins niche breadth (BL) (Levins 1970) to comprehensively describe the niche breadth of the main canopy tree species in these communities. The calculation formula is as follows:
| (2) |
| (3) |
where r is the total number of quadrats; P ij = n ij /N i , P ij represents the proportion of individuals of species i in resource state j to the total number of individuals of species i; n ij is the quantity of species i utilizing resource state j, represented by the importance value of species i in quadrat j in this study; N i is the total number of individuals of species i.
2.5.3. Pianka Niche Overlap
The niche overlap index by Levins (Pianka 1973) was used to quantify the degree of niche overlap among species within communities. The calculation formula is as follows:
| (4) |
where O ik is the niche overlap value, n ij and n kj are the importance values (IV) of species i and k for resource j, respectively. O ik ranges from 0 to 1, with values closer to 1 indicating higher overlap.
2.5.4. Functional Traits and Their Altitudinal Adaptation
One‐Way ANOVA was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 to examine the differences in leaf functional traits among F. hayatae, F. engleriana, and their associated species, with Duncan's test for multiple comparisons. Independent samples t‐tests were used to analyze the significant differences in leaf functional traits between F. hayatae and F. engleriana, and SigmaPlot 14.0 was employed for graphical representation.
Pearson correlation analysis was applied to assess the relationships among leaf functional traits of F. hayatae at different altitudes, with correlation heatmaps generated using ggplot2 in R 4.1.3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of leaf functional traits in F. hayatae at different altitudes was performed using the psych package in R 4.1.3. Duncan's test was also used to examine the significant differences in leaf functional traits of F. hayatae at different altitudes.
3. Results
3.1. Ecological Characteristics of F. hayatae and F. engleriana Communities
3.1.1. Importance Value and Niche Breadth of Canopy Trees
As shown in Table 2, the F. hayatae community consists of 17 canopy tree species, with five dominant species showing importance values exceeding 5%: F. hayatae (63.00%, clearly dominant), Carpinus turczaninowii (5.30%), Tsuga chinensis (5.24%), Cornus kousa subsp.chinensis (5.22%), and Sorbus alnifolia (5.11%). Niche breadth analysis using both Levins (BS) and Shannon‐Wiener (BL) indices revealed a consistent hierarchical pattern, with F. hayatae exhibiting the widest niche (BS = 1.093, BL = 14.348). The subdominant species showed progressively narrower niche breadths: C. kousa and S. alnifolia (BS = 1.055, BL = 11.778), followed by T. chinensis (BS = 1.011, BL = 9.000). These results demonstrated F. hayatae's superior competitive position and broad niche within the community.
TABLE 2.
Important values in F. hayatae and F. engleriana communities.
| Community | Species | RA (%) | RF (%) | RD (%) | IV (%) | Shannon‐Wiener (B S ) | Levins (B L ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fagus hayatae | Fagus hayatae | 66.67 | 38.17 | 84.15 | 63 | 1.093 | 14.348 |
| Carpinus turczaninowii | 5.51 | 4.96 | 5.42 | 5.3 | 1.011 | 7.571 | |
| Tsuga chinensis | 3.8 | 7.63 | 4.29 | 5.24 | 1.040 | 9.000 | |
| Cornus kousa subsp.chinensis | 4.76 | 7.63 | 3.28 | 5.22 | 1.055 | 11.778 | |
| Sorbus alnifolia | 4.76 | 4.96 | 5.6 | 5.11 | 1.055 | 11.778 | |
| Fagus engleriana | Fagus engleriana | 58.72 | 31.65 | 74.75 | 55.04 | 2.693 | 14.549 |
| Cornus kousa subsp. chinensis | 9.17 | 12.66 | 5.72 | 9.18 | 2.079 | 8.496 | |
| Carpinus turczaninowii | 7.34 | 10.44 | 5.89 | 7.89 | 1.792 | 6.850 | |
| Quercus shennongii | 4.59 | 6.33 | 4.33 | 5.08 | 1.386 | 4.774 | |
| Acer ceriferum | 2.75 | 6.33 | 0.85 | 3.31 | 0.693 | 2.334 |
The F. engleriana community comprises 18 canopy tree species, with four dominant species exhibiting importance values exceeding 5%: F. engleriana (55.04%, clearly dominant), Cornus kousa subsp. chinensis (9.18%), Carpinus turczaninowii (7.89%), and Quercus shennongii (5.08%). Niche breadth analysis revealed a consistent hierarchical pattern in both Levins (BS) and Shannon‐Wiener (BL) indices. F. engleriana demonstrated the widest niche (BS = 2.693, BL = 14.549), followed by C. kousa (BS = 2.079, BL = 8.496) and C. turczaninowii (BS = 1.792, BL = 6.850). Sorbus alnifolia (BS = 1.609, BL = 5.992) and Q. shennongii (BS = 1.386, BL = 4.774) showed progressively narrower niche breadths, confirming F. engleriana's superior competitive dominance in this community.
3.1.2. Niche Overlap of Canopy Layer in the Communities
The analysis of niche overlap patterns in the canopy layer revealed important ecological relationships in the two Fagus communities (Figure 2). In the F. hayatae community, 31.25% of species pairs (5 out of 16) showed significant niche overlap (O ik ≥ 0.50), with the strongest overlap occurring between F. hayatae and Cornus kousa subsp. chinensis (O ik = 0.866), followed by Tsuga chinensis (0.784), Carpinus turczaninowii (0.693), Sorbus alnifolia (0.651), and Pinus armandii (0.506). Similarly, the F. engleriana community exhibited significant overlap in 22.22% of species pairs (4 out of 18), most notably with C. kousa (0.76), C. turczaninowii (0.64), S. alnifolia (0.60), and Castanopsis sclerophylla (0.54). Notably, both the two Fagus species demonstrated their highest niche overlap with C. kousa , suggesting potential competition for resources.
FIGURE 2.

Niche overlap of main tree species in communities. (a) the niche breadth in F. hayatae communities; (b) the niche breadth in F. engleriana communities.
3.2. Comparative Analysis of Leaf Functional Traits
3.2.1. Comparison of Leaf Functional Traits Between Fagus hayatae and Associated Species
Comparative analysis of leaf functional traits revealed distinct ecological strategies between F. hayatae and its associated species (Figure 3). Morphologically, F. hayatae exhibited significantly larger leaf dimensions (LL, LW, LC, LA, LT; p < 0.05) than Tsuga chinensis, which displayed the most elongated leaves (highest LL/LW ratio). Stomatal characteristics showed F. hayatae possessed the smallest stomata (SL, SW, SC, SA) but the highest density (SD), while Tsuga chinensis had the largest stomata. Economic traits traits indicated F. hayatae's conservative resource strategy, with higher LDMC and LCC than Cornus kousa subsp. chinensis (p < 0.05), along with greater SLA and LNC compared to both T. chinensis and C. kousa (p < 0.05). Nutrient profiles showed significant differences in C:N and N:P ratios with T. chinensis (p < 0.05), while LPC remained similar across species (p > 0.05).
FIGURE 3.

Comparison of leaf functional traits of F. hayatae and its dominant associated species. Leaf length (LL), (b) Leaf width (LW), (c) Leaf length to width ratio (LL/LW), (d) Leaf circumference (LC), (e) Leaf area (LA), (f) Leaf thickness (LT), (g) Stomatal Length (SL), (h) Stomatal Width (SW), (i) Stomatal length‐to‐width ratio (SL/SW), (j) Stomatal perimeter (SC), (k) Stomatal Area (SA), (l) Stomatal Density (SD), (m) Leaf dry matter content (LDMC), (n) Specific leaf area (SLA), (o) Leaf carbon content (LCC), (p) Leaf nitrogen content (LNC), (q) Leaf phosphorus content (LPC), (r) Carbon: Nitrogen Ratio (C:N), (s) Nitrogen: Phosphorus Ratio (N:P). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among species at p < 0.05. Error bars represent standard errors.
3.2.2. Comparison of Leaf Functional Traits Between Fagus engleriana and Associated Species
Comparative analysis of leaf functional traits revealed distinct variations between F. engleriana and its dominant associated species (Figure 4). Morphologically, F. engleriana exhibited significantly greater leaf width (LW) but lower leaf thickness (LT) and length‐to‐width ratio (LL/LW) compared to Quercus shennongii (p < 0.05), while showing distinct leaf perimeter (LC) from Carpinus turczaninowii (p < 0.05). Stomatal characteristics demonstrated that F. engleriana possessed the smallest stomatal dimensions (SL, SW, SC, SA) but highest density (SD), contrasting with Cornus kousa subsp. chinensis, which had the largest stomata. Economic traits analyses showed F. engleriana had the highest specific leaf area (SLA) but intermediate leaf dry matter content (LDMC), with Q. shennongii exhibiting the opposite pattern (p < 0.05). Nutrient profiles revealed F. engleriana had the highest leaf carbon content (LCC), while C. turczaninowii showed the highest nitrogen (LNC) and phosphorus (LPC) contents (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 4.

Comparison of leaf functional traits of F. engleriana and its dominant associated species. (a) Leaf length (LL), (b) Leaf width (LW), (c) Leaf length to width ratio (LL/LW), (d) Leaf circumference (LC), (e) Leaf area (LA), (f) Leaf thickness (LT), (g) Stomatal length (SL), (h) Stomatal width (SW), (i) Stomatal length‐to‐width ratio (SL/SW), (j) Stomatal perimeter (SC), (k) Stomatal area (SA), (l) Stomatal density (SD), (m) Leaf dry matter content (LDMC), (n) Specific leaf area (SLA), (o) Leaf carbon content (LCC), (p) Leaf nitrogen content (LNC), (q) Leaf phosphorus content (LPC). (r) Carbon: nitrogen ratio (C:N), (s) Nitrogen: phosphorus ratio (N:P). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among species at p < 0.05. Error bars represent standard errors.
3.2.3. Comparison of Leaf Functional Traits Between Fagus hayatae and Fagus engleriana
The comparative analysis revealed significant interspecific differentiation in leaf functional traits between F. hayatae and F. engleriana (Figure 5). F. hayatae exhibited a conservative resource‐use strategy characterized by significantly smaller leaf dimensions (LL, LW, LC, LA, LT; p < 0.05) yet larger stomatal structures (SL, SW, SC, SA; p < 0.05) compared to F. engleriana. Economic traits showed contrasting patterns, with F. hayatae possessing higher LDMC (p < 0.05) but lower SLA (p < 0.05), indicating thicker and denser leaves. Nutrient profiles differed markedly, as F. hayatae had significantly reduced LCC and LNC (p < 0.05) but elevated LPC (p < 0.05), resulting in a substantially lower N:P ratio (p < 0.05). The two species both maintained similar leaf allometry (LL/LW) and carbon‐nitrogen stoichiometry (C:N) (p > 0.05).
FIGURE 5.

Comparison of leaf functional traits between F. hayatae and F. engleriana. (a) Leaf length (LL), (b) Leaf width (LW), (c) Leaf length‐to‐width ratio (LL/LW), (d) Leaf circumference (LC), (e) Leaf area (LA), (f) Leaf thickness (LT), (g) Stomatal length (SL), (h) Stomatal width (SW), (i) Stomatal length‐to‐width ratio (SL/SW), (j) Stomatal perimeter (SC), (k) Stomatal area (SA), (l) Stomatal density (SD), (m) Leaf dry matter content (LDMC), (n) Specific leaf area (SLA), (o) Leaf carbon content (LCC), (p) Leaf nitrogen content (LNC), (q) Leaf phosphorus content (LPC). (r) Carbon:Nitrogen ratio (C:N). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among species at p < 0.05. Error bars represent standard errors.
3.3. The Impact of Altitude on the Leaf Functional Traits of Fagus hayatae
3.3.1. Correlation Analysis of Leaf Functional Traits
Pearson correlation analysis revealed complex interdependencies among 19 leaf functional traits across elevational gradients (Figure 6). Key morphological traits (LL, LW, LA, LC) showed strong positive intercorrelations (p < 0.01), while exhibiting inverse relationships with structural traits (LT, SD, LDMC; p < 0.01). Stomatal characteristics demonstrated particularly notable patterns: SL correlated positively with SW, SA, and SC (p < 0.01), but negatively with SD and stoichiometric ratios (C:N, N:P; p < 0.01). The SL/SW ratio emerged as a key integrative parameter, showing strong positive associations with SD and LDMC (p < 0.01), but negative correlations with SLA (p < 0.01).
FIGURE 6.

Correlation analysis of leaf functional traits of F. hayatae at different altitudes. *Represents a significant correlation at the 0.05 level, **represents a significant correlation at the 0.01 level.
3.3.2. Altitudinal Variation in Leaf Functional Traits: A Principal Component Analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed distinct patterns in the leaf functional traits of F. hayatae across altitudinal gradients (Figure 7). While considerable overlap existed among elevations, trait differentiation was evident, with high‐altitude populations clustering along the positive PC1 axis (41.0% variance explained) and mid‐altitude populations along the negative PC1 axis. The first two principal components collectively accounted for 55.7% of total trait variation (PC1: 41.0%; PC2: 14.7%). PC1 was strongly influenced (loading > 0.5) by stomatal traits (SW, SC, SA, SL, SD) and leaf morphology (LW, LA, LC, LL, SLA). PC2 was primarily associated with leaf size (LA, LC, LW, LL), nutrient stoichiometry (LPC, C:N), and stomatal length (SL).
FIGURE 7.

Principal component analysis of leaf functional traits of F. hayatae at different altitudes.
3.3.3. Altitudinal Patterns in Leaf Functional Traits
Pearson correlation and linear regression analyses (Figure 8) revealed significant elevational trends in leaf traits of F. hayatae. Multiple morphological traits—including leaf dimensions (LL, LW, LC, LA) and stomatal characteristics (SL, SW, SC, SA)—showed strong negative correlations with elevation (p < 0.01), exhibiting progressive decreases with increasing altitude. Similarly, specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf phosphorus content (LPC) displayed significant altitudinal declines (p < 0.01), though LPC followed a unimodal pattern, initially increasing before decreasing at higher elevations. In contrast, stomatal density (SD) and carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio (C:N) increased significantly with elevation (p < 0.01).
FIGURE 8.

Variation of leaf functional characters of F. hayatae with increasing altitude. (a) Leaf length (LL), (b) Leaf width (LW), (c) Leaf circumference (LC), (d) Leaf area (LA), (e) Stomatal length (SL), (f) Stomatal width (SW), (g) Stomatal perimeter (SC), (h) Stomatal area (SA), (i) Stomatal density (SD), (j) Specific leaf area (SLA), (k) Leaf phosphorus content (LPC), (l) Carbon: nitrogen ratio (C:N). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among species at p < 0.05. Error bars represent standard errors.
4. Discussion
4.1. Community Ecological Characteristics
The ecological dominance of tree species within the community can be effectively assessed through their importance values and niche breadths (Schellenberger et al. 2018). Our findings demonstrate that Fagus hayatae exhibited the highest importance value and niche breadth indices, confirming its status as the dominant species in this forest community. Subdominant species including Carpinus turczaninowii, Cornus kousa , Tsuga chinensis, and Sorbus alnifolia showed intermediate niche breadths, indicating their complementary ecological functions in the community.
The analysis of niche overlap patterns reveals a complex web of resource utilization strategies among canopy species (Costa‐Pereira et al. 2019) that most canopy species maintain differentiation (68.75% species pairs with Oik < 0.5), enhancing biodiversity through diversified resource strategies. This low‐overlap regime reduces competition and stabilizes communities, as predicted by coexistence theory (de Francesco et al. 2021). In contrast, the high niche overlap between F. hayatae and dominant co‐occurring species ( Cornus kousa , Tsuga chinensis) reflects convergent resource utilization strategies, triggering intense competition that depletes soil moisture and nutrients. Under such abiotic stress, seedlings accumulate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that disrupt metabolic processes and damage cellular structures. To mitigate ROS toxicity, plants activate antioxidant enzymes (e.g., SOD, CAT) and synthesize secondary metabolites (e.g., flavonoids), diverting energy from growth to defense (Bhusal et al. 2021). This physiological trade‐off explains the marked absence of seedlings and saplings in natural populations, ultimately crippling regeneration. This aligns with Li, Dong, et al. 2016; Li, Wu, et al. 2016), who found that as F. hayatae communities mature, seedlings require more nutrients and light, intensifying niche overlap with neighboring plants, overstory trees, and understory shrubs. This increased competition raises mortality rates and reduces survival.
What's more, Zhu et al. (2013) argued that endangered species in special habitats can exhibit population dominance within a community, but their population structure may not be healthy, and they still face difficulties in natural regeneration. Previous studies have shown that the F. hayatae population in the Reserve has a low number of existing seedlings and faces difficulties in natural regeneration (Li, Dong, et al. 2016; Li, Wu, et al. 2016). Therefore, a broad niche does not necessarily mean that F. hayatae is a generalist species; it may still face significant survival pressures, and population breeding efforts are urgently needed.
4.2. Adaptive Strategies of Leaf Function Traits in F. hayatae Compared to Dominant Associated Species
F. hayatae exhibits distinct functional traits that reflect its adaptive strategies in competition with dominant associated species. In leaf morphology, its comparable leaf area (LA) to most species (except Tsuga chinensis) suggests convergent light‐capture strategies under community competition (Xu et al. 2021), while its significantly lower leaf thickness (LT) than Carpinus turczaninowii, Cornus kousa , and Sorbus alnifolia indicates an “exploitative” growth strategy—prioritizing rapid expansion over nutrient storage (Xu et al. 2015). Thin leaves enhance light penetration to chloroplasts, boosting photosynthetic efficiency. Stomatal traits further support this strategy: F. hayatae's small, high‐density stomata facilitate rapid environmental response and elevated photosynthetic capacity, contrasting sharply with the large stomata of the gymnosperm T. chinensis , which represent an adaptation for conservative water use (Lammertsma et al. 2011). Critically, this stomatal configuration enables fine‐tuned regulation of gas exchange, optimizing water‐use efficiency (WUE) under fluctuating environmental stresses as described in global stomatal function patterns (Wright et al. 2004).
Economic traits reveal F. hayatae's competitive edge. Its higher specific leaf area (SLA) than T. chinensis and C. kousa aligns with efficient light harvesting and nutrient retention, while its superior leaf nitrogen content (LNC) underscores heightened photosynthetic capacity (Onoda et al. 2004). Stoichiometric ratios highlight phosphorus limitation (N:P > 16) in most species, suggesting F. hayatae thrives under moderate nitrogen availability (Güsewell 2004). Notably, its high leaf dry matter content (LDMC) indicates robust resource utilization and stress resilience, critical for dominance in heterogeneous environments.
In summary, F. hayatae combines rapid growth (via thin leaves, high SLA/LNC) with environmental responsiveness (small, dense stomata) and efficient resource use (high LDMC, balanced C:N), outcompeting associates through exploitative plasticity. This trait synergy enables persistence in light‐ and nutrient‐competitive niches.
4.3. Comparative Analysis of Leaf Functional Traits Between F. hayatae and F. engleriana
This study reveals key differences in leaf functional traits between F. hayatae and F. engleriana. In leaf morphology, F. hayatae has a smaller leaf area (LA), reducing light capture efficiency compared to F. engleriana, which maximizes photosynthetic gains through larger LA. Stomatal traits further support this: F. hayatae also exhibits larger, sparser stomata with slower response times, indicating weaker photosynthetic capacity and water‐use efficiency than F. engleriana.
Within the leaf economics spectrum, F. hayatae exhibits a low specific leaf area (SLA) and high leaf dry matter content (LDMC), reflecting a slow‐growth strategy that prioritizes long‐term storage over rapid resource acquisition (Grime et al. 1997). In contrast, F. engleriana, with its higher SLA, facilitates greater light interception per unit biomass and a faster carbon return on investment, enhancing its productivity and competitive dominance in resource‐rich environments (Wright et al. 2004; Wilson et al. 2010). Its elevated leaf nitrogen content (LNC) further supports this strategy by increasing the concentration of photosynthetic enzymes (e.g., Rubisco), directly boosting photosynthetic capacity and growth rates (Poorter et al. 2010; Hou et al. 2020). Stomatal traits also differentiate their adaptations: F. hayatae's larger, sparser stomata exhibit slower response times to environmental fluctuations, reducing its ability to rapidly regulate water loss during drought stress and lowering water‐use efficiency (WUE). Inversely, F. engleriana's smaller, denser stomata enable finer control over gas exchange, allowing quicker closure under water deficit to maintain hydraulic safety—a critical advantage in fluctuating or arid conditions (Lammertsma et al. 2011).
In summary, F. hayatae exhibits larger stomata, lower density, and reduced resource‐acquisition traits (via LL/LW/LA, SLA/LCC/LNC) versus F. engleriana, reflecting poorer resource efficiency, competitiveness, and adaptability. These synergistic trait deficiencies drive persistent declines in seedling establishment and sapling survival, aligning with IUCN criteria for endangered species designation.
4.4. The Impact of Altitude on the Leaf Functional Traits of F. hayatae
4.4.1. Coordinated Adaptation of Functional Traits in F. hayatae
To decode the multivariate coordination of leaf functional traits and identify key adaptive trade‐offs across altitudes, we employed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and correlation networks. Plants optimize functional trait combinations through trade‐offs to adapt to environmental constraints (Wright et al. 2007).
In F. hayatae, key trait correlations reveal coordinated strategies: LA shows a positive correlation with specific leaf area (SLA) but a negative correlation with leaf dry matter content (LDMC), reflecting a balance between light capture (high LA/SLA) and water‐use efficiency (high LDMC) (Shipley 1995; Fonseca et al. 2000). This aligns with global patterns, where thinner, larger leaves enhance metabolic rates in resource‐rich environments. Crucially, we observed a key trade‐off between stomatal density (SD) and stomatal size (SL, SA) (Wang, He, et al. 2016; Wang, Yu, et al. 2016). Higher SD, often associated with smaller stomata (Kardiman and Ræbild 2018), is linked to faster stomatal opening and closing kinetics, potentially enabling a rapid response to fluctuating environmental conditions such as sudden bursts of sunlight or vapor pressure deficit (Kardiman and Ræbild 2018). Concurrently, this stomatal morphology (SD vs. size) is intrinsically linked to water‐use efficiency (WUE). Generally, lower SD and larger stomatal size tend to correlate with higher intrinsic WUE (reflected in less negative leaf carbon isotope discrimination) by reducing cuticular and stomatal conductance (Petrík et al. 2023). In F. hayatae, stomatal density (SD) declines with increasing LA, likely due to mesophyll cell expansion reducing stomatal space per unit area. These coordinated adjustments in stomatal traits enable efficient gas exchange under varying altitudinal pressures: smaller, denser stomata potentially offering faster response times advantageous at high elevations for mitigating cold‐induced hydraulic stress and coping with shorter growing seasons, while larger, sparser stomata favor steady CO2 uptake and potentially higher WUE at lower elevations (Wang, He, et al. 2016; Wang, Yu, et al. 2016; Petrík et al. 2023). It is noteworthy that these relationships between stomatal anatomy may vary between juvenile and mature developmental stages (Petrík et al. 2024), highlighting the dynamic nature of trait optimization across the plant lifespan. The negative C:N vs. leaf nitrogen content (LNC) correlation highlights a carbon‐nitrogen trade‐off: higher carbon investment (e.g., structural compounds) reduces nitrogen availability for photosynthesis (Yan et al. 2024). Similarly, N:P ratios are driven by phosphorus (LPC), with high N:P (> 16) indicating phosphorus limitation, a common constraint in F. hayatae's (Yang et al. 2010).
These trait networks allow F. hayatae to balance light acquisition (LA/SLA), water economy (LDMC/SD), and nutrient use (C:N/N:P) across altitudes. Smaller, thicker leaves with dense stomata dominate high‐elevation stress zones, where low SLA and high LDMC minimize water loss and frost damage (Wright et al. 2007), while larger leaves with optimized stomata and nutrient ratios enhance competitiveness at lower elevations. Such integrated adjustments underscore its niche differentiation within forest ecosystems.
4.4.2. Altitudinal Adaptation of Leaf Functional Traits in F. hayatae
Plants and their environments are intricately linked, with morphological traits reflecting long‐term evolutionary adaptations to climatic conditions (Li et al. 2013). Altitudinal gradients impose dramatic shifts in light, temperature, humidity, and moisture, driving distinct patterns in plant functional traits. F. hayatae exhibits marked altitudinal variation in leaf morphology: leaf length (LL), width (LW), perimeter (LC), and area (LA) decrease with elevation, likely due to reduced interspecific competition at higher altitudes. Smaller leaves at high elevations minimize maintenance costs, mitigate frost damage by lowering saturated water content (Wright et al. 2007), and reduce wind resistance (Givnish et al. 1984). Stomatal traits of F. hayatae also shift with elevation. Stomatal size decreases at higher altitudes, enabling faster responses to fluctuating conditions like low temperatures and high UV‐B (Hetherington and Woodward 2003), while stomatal density (SD) increases to compensate for lower CO2 and O2 partial pressures (Mott et al. 1982; Liu et al. 2020) and enhance drought tolerance via rapid stomatal closure.
Specific leaf area (SLA) declines with elevation, reflecting a shift toward stress resistance: water conservation strategies under cold‐induced root uptake limitations (Hultine and Marshall 2000) and enhanced cold resistance. Nutrient allocation of F. hayatae follows a mid‐elevation peak: leaf phosphorus content (LPC) is highest at mid‐altitudes, where balanced conditions favor photosynthetic investment but declines at higher elevations as resources shift to protective tissues. Notably, N:P ratios consistently exceed 16 across elevations, indicating phosphorus‐limited growth—a pattern consistent with broader findings in Chinese vegetation (Ren et al. 2007; Koerselman and Meuleman 1996).
The studies showed that at low altitudes, plants increase LA and SLA to enhance light capture, while at high altitudes, they adopt a conservative strategy—reducing LA, SLA, SA, and LPC—to improve stress resistance, particularly against cold‐impaired photosynthesis and water stress. These trait variations underscore F. hayatae's adaptive trade‐offs between growth efficiency and stress tolerance across altitudinal gradients, highlighting that high‐altitude regions are unfavorable for its growth and reproduction. Using a space‐for‐time substitution approach, it is inferred that under global warming, the fitness of F. hayatae's leaf functional traits will decline, hindering population regeneration and recruitment. Consequently, F. hayatae is likely to shift its distribution toward higher elevations in the future.
5. Conclusion
Functional trait comparisons between Fagus hayatae and its sympatric species, F. engleriana, as well as across elevational gradients, reveal adaptive plasticity and critical regeneration constraints, guiding evidence‐based conservation efforts. Specifically: (Wright et al. 2004) Adaptive advantages over sympatric competitors include stress‐tolerant traits, such as elevated leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and leaf phosphorus concentration (LPC), and efficient stomatal regulation (characterized by smaller, denser stomata). These traits secure niche dominance in stable habitats. (Li et al. 2025) Regeneration impairment arises from conservative resource allocation compared to F. engleriana: reduced specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC) limit light and nitrogen acquisition, thereby crippling seedling competitiveness under interspecific competition. (Holden and Cahill Jr. 2024) Elevational plasticity peaks at mid‐elevations (1600–1900 m) with balanced trait coordination, exemplified by the SLA‐LDMC equilibrium. However, resource reallocation to defense at higher elevations, indicated by reduced leaf area (LA) to SLA ratios, exacerbates recruitment bottlenecks. To overcome these constraints, we propose the following management strategies: (Wright et al. 2004) Priority conservation of mid‐elevation core zones (1600–1900 m) as climate refugia; (Li et al. 2025) Phosphorus supplementation in regeneration microsites to alleviate N:P ratios greater than 16. Unfortunately, this study focused solely on leaf‐level traits, lacking assessments of key physiological processes, whole‐plant architecture, and soil properties. Future investigations that integrate these dimensions will enhance our understanding of F. hayatae's environmental adaptations.
Author Contributions
Ting Pan: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), software (equal), writing – original draft (equal). Qian Yang: data curation (equal), investigation (equal), software (equal), visualization (equal). Hong‐yan Han: funding acquisition (equal), methodology (equal), project administration (equal). Xiao‐juan Liu: investigation (equal), methodology (equal), resources (equal). Meng‐xing Jia: investigation (equal), methodology (equal), resources (equal). Xiao‐hong Gan: data curation (equal), funding acquisition (equal), methodology (equal), project administration (equal), resources (equal), supervision (equal), visualization (equal), writing – review and editing (equal).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Data S1: ece372185‐sup‐0001‐Supinfo01.xlsx.
Data S2: ece372185‐sup‐0002‐Supinfo02.xlsx.
Data S3: ece372185‐sup‐0003‐Supinfo03.xlsx.
Data S4: ece372185‐sup‐0004‐Supinfo04.xlsx.
Data S5: ece372185‐sup‐0005‐Supinfo05.xlsx.
Data S6: ece372185‐sup‐0006‐Supinfo06.xlsx.
Data S7: ece372185‐sup‐0007‐Supinfo07.xlsx.
Acknowledgments
We thank all students who helped to collect and analyze data: Qian Yang, Hongyan Han, and we also thank the following people in Micang Mountain Nature Reserve of Sichuan Province for sample collecting: Xuewu Feng, Nuli Zheng.
Pan, T. , Yang Q., Han H.‐y., Liu X.‐j., Jia M.‐x., and Gan X.‐h.. 2025. “Leaf Trait Divergence and Elevational Adaptation in Endangered Fagus hayatae: Conservation Insights for an East Asian Paleoendemic.” Ecology and Evolution 15, no. 9: e72185. 10.1002/ece3.72185.
Funding: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 32400303; no. 32070371), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (no. 23NSFSC1272), and the Innovation Team Funds of China West Normal University (KCXTD2022‐4).
Data Availability Statement
All the required data is uploaded as Supporting Information.
References
- Badraghi, A. , Ventura M., Polo A., Borruso L., Giammarchi F., and Montagnani L.. 2021. “Soil Respiration Variation Along an Altitudinal Gradient in the Italian Alps: Disentangling Forest Structure and Temperature Effects.” PLoS One 16, no. 8: e247893. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhusal, N. , Lee M., Lee H., et al. 2021. “Evaluation of Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Traits for Assessing Drought Resistance in Eleven Tree Species.” Science of the Total Environment 779: 146466. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaturvedi, R. K. , Raghubanshi A. S., and Singh J. S.. 2011. “Plant Functional Traits With Particular Reference to Tropical Deciduous Forests: A Review.” Journal of Biosciences 36, no. 5: 963–981. 10.1007/s12038-011-9159-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J. 2014. “Investigation Report on Fagus Resources in Micang Mountain Nature Reserve.” Chinese Wild Plant Resources 33, no. 2: 47–52. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9690.2014.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X. , Yuan Z. X., Jin X. M., et al. 2020. “Niche Characteristics of Main Plant Populations in Coniferous and Broad‐Leaved Mixed Forest of Zijin Mountain.” Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology 40, no. 8: 113–119. [Google Scholar]
- Colwell, R. K. , and Futuyma D. J.. 1971. “On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap.” Ecology 52, no. 4: 567–576. 10.2307/1934144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costa‐Pereira, R. , Araújo M. S., Souza F. L., and Ingram T.. 2019. “Competition and Resource Breadth Shape Niche Variation and Overlap in Multiple Trophic Dimensions.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286, no. 1902: 369. 10.1098/RSPB.2019.0369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Francesco, B. , Lavorel S., and Hallett L. M.. 2021. “Functional Trait Effects on Ecosystem Stability: Assembling the Jigsaw Puzzle.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 36, no. 9: 822–836. 10.1016/j.tree.2021.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonseca, C. R. , Overton J. M., Collins B., and Westoby M.. 2000. “Shifts in Trait‐Combinations Along Rainfall and Phosphorus Gradients.” Journal of Ecology 88: 964–977. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00506.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Givnish, T. J. , Burkhardt E. L., Happel R. E., and Weintraub J. D.. 1984. “Carnivory in the Bromeliad Brocchinia Reducta, With a Cost/Benefit Model for the General Restriction of Carnivorous Plants to Sunny, Moist, Nutrient‐Poor Habitats.” American Naturalist 124, no. 4: 479–497. [Google Scholar]
- Grime, J. P. , Thompson K., Hunt R., et al. 1997. “Integrated Screening Validates Primary Axes of Specialisation in Plants.” Oikos 79: 259–281. 10.2307/3546011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo, R. , Weng D., Jin Y., et al. 2014. “Regeneration Dynamics of Fagus hayatae Population in Qingliang Peak, Zhejiang Province From 2006 to 2011 and Its Relationship With Habita.” Guihaia 34, no. 4: 478–483. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2014.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Güsewell, S. 2004. “N:P Ratios in Terrestrial Plants: Variation and Functional Significance.” New Phytologist 164: 243–266. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He, C. M. , Liu R. Q., Yang Z. C., et al. 2021. “Species Composition and Community Structure of Warm Temperate Deciduous Broad‐Leaved Forest in Huangguan of Qinling Mountains.” Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 32, no. 8: 2737–2744. 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hetherington, A. M. , and Woodward F. I.. 2003. “The Role of Stomata in Sensing and Driving Environmental Change.” Nature 424, no. 6951: 901–908. 10.1038/nature01843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holden, E. M. , and Cahill J. F. Jr. 2024. “Plant Trait Dissimilarity Increases Competitive Interactions Among Co‐Occurring Plants.” Functional Ecology 38: 1464–1474. 10.1111/1365-2435.14561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hou, E. , Luo Y., Kuang Y., et al. 2020. “Global Meta‐Analysis Shows Pervasive Phosphorus Limitation of Aboveground Plant Production in Natural Terrestrial Ecosystems.” Nature Communications 11, no. 1: 637. 10.1038/s41467-020-14492-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hultine, K. R. , and Marshall J. D.. 2000. “Altitude Trends in Conifer Leaf Morphology and Stable Carbon Isotope Composition.” Oecologia 123, no. 1: 32–40. 10.1007/s004420050986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kardiman, R. , and Ræbild A.. 2018. “Relationship Between Stomatal Density, Size and Speed of Opening in Sumatran Rainforest Species.” Tree Physiology 38, no. 5: 696–705. 10.1093/treephys/tpx149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, E. , and Donohue K.. 2013. “Local Adaptation and Plasticity of Erysimum capitatum to Altitude: Its Implications for Responses to Climate Change.” Journal of Ecology 101, no. 3: 796–805. 10.1111/1365-2745.12077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Koerselman, W. , and Meuleman A.. 1996. “The Vegetation N:P Ratio: A New Tool to Detect the Nature of Nutrient Limitation.” Journal of Applied Ecology 33, no. 6: 1441–1450. 10.2307/2404783. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kraft, N. J. , Godoy O., and Levine J. M.. 2015. “Plant Functional Traits and the Multidimensional Nature of Species Coexistence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, no. 3: 797–802. 10.1073/pnas.1413650112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lammertsma, E. I. , de Boer H. J., Dekker S. C., et al. 2011. “Global CO2 Rise Leads to Reduced Maximum Stomatal Conductance in Florida Vegetation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, no. 10: 4035–4040. 10.1073/pnas.1100371108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levins, R. 1970. “Ordering the Phenomena of Ecology:Evolution in Changing Environments.” Science 167, no. 3924: 1478–1480. 10.1126/science.167.3924.1478. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li, D. D. , Dong T. F., Chen J., et al. 2016. “Community Characteristics and Diversity of Fagus hayatae in Micang Mountain Nature Reserve, Sichuan.” Acta Botanica Boreali‐Occidentalia Sinica 36, no. 1: 174–182. 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2016.01.0174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li, D. S. , Shi Z. M., Feng Q. H., et al. 2013. “Responses of Leaf Morphological Traits of Quercus Species to Climatic Conditions in the Warm Temperate Zone of North‐South Transect of Eastern China.” Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 37, no. 9: 793–802. 10.3724/sp.j.1258.2013.00083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li, J. X. , Wu D. J., Zhang S. P., et al. 2016. “Analysis of Life Table and Population Dynamics of Fagus hayatae Population in the Micangshan Nature Reserve in Sichuan.” Bulletin of Botanical Research 36, no. 1: 68–74. [Google Scholar]
- Li, M. , Cao W. X., Li X., et al. 2025. “Elevational Variation and Driving Factors of Leaf Functional Traits in Alpine Shrubs of Sanjiangyuan Nature Reserve, China.” Global Ecology and Conservation 59: 2351–9894. 10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03555. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, W. , Zheng L., and Qi D.. 2020. “Variation in Leaf Traits at Different Altitudes Reflects the Adaptive Strategy of Plants to Environmental Changes.” Ecology and Evolution 10, no. 15: 8166–8175. 10.1002/ece3.6519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X. D. , Fang J. G., Yang X. C., et al. 2003. “Climatology of Pentad Precipitation and Atmospheric Circulation Characteristics in the Adjacent Areas of Qinling Mountains.” Journal of Arid Meteorology 3: 8–13. [Google Scholar]
- Mott, K. A. , Gibson A. C., and O'Leary J. W.. 1982. “The Adaptive Significance of Amphistomatic Leaves.” Plant, Cell & Environment 5, no. 6: 455–460. 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11611750. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Onoda, Y. , Hikosaka K., and Hirose T.. 2004. “Allocation of Nitrogen to Cell Walls Decreases Photosynthetic Nitrogen‐Use Efficiency.” Functional Ecology 18, no. 3: 419–425. 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00847.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pandey, R. , Rawat M., Singh R., et al. 2024. “Plant Trait Approach to Assess the Vulnerability of Rhododendron arboreum in Western Himalayas.” Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 23: 100415. 10.1016/j.indic.2024.100415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Petrík, P. , Petek‐Petrik A., Mukarram M., Schuldt B., and Lamarque L. J.. 2023. “Leaf Physiological and Morphological Constraints of Water‐Use Efficiency in C3 Plants.” AoB Plants 15, no. 4: plad047. 10.1093/aobpla/plad047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petrík, P. , Petek‐Petrík A., Lamarque L. J., et al. 2024. “Linking Stomatal Size and Density to Water Use Efficiency and Leaf Carbon Isotope Ratio in Juvenile and Mature Trees.” Physiologia Plantarum 176, no. 6: e14619. 10.1111/ppl.14619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pianka, E. R. 1973. “The Structure of Lizard Communities.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 53–74. 10.1146/ANNUREV.ES.04.110173.000413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Poorter, L. , kitajima K., Mercado P., Chubiña J., Melgar I., and Prins H. H. T.. 2010. “Resprouting as a Persistence Strategy of Tropical Forest Trees: Relations With Carbohydrate Storage and Shade Tolerance.” Ecology 91, no. 9: 2613–2627. 10.1890/09-0862.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren, S. J. , Yu G. R., Tao B., et al. 2007. “Leaf Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry Across 654 Terrestrial Plant Species in NSTEC.” Environmental Sciences 28, no. 12: 2665–2673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schellenberger, C. D. , Gerschlauer F., Kiese R., et al. 2018. “Plant Niche Breadths Along Environmental Gradients and Their Relationship to Plant Functional Traits.” Diversity and Distributions 24, no. 12: 1869–1882. 10.1111/ddi.12815. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shipley, B. 1995. “Structured Interspecific Determinants of Specific Leaf Area in 34 Species of Herbaceous Angiosperms.” Functional Ecology 9: 312–319. 10.2307/2390579. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Walther, G. R. , Post E., Convey P., et al. 2002. “Ecological Responses to Recent Climate Change.” Nature 416, no. 28: 389–395. 10.1038/416389a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q. , He N. P., Yu G. Y., et al. 2016. “Soil Microbial Respiration Rate and Temperature Sensitivity Along a North‐South Forest Transect in Eastern China: Patterns and Influencing Factors.” Journal of Geophysical Research‐Biogeosciences 121: 399–410. 10.1002/2015JG003217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R. L. , Yu G. R., He N. P., et al. 2016. “Altitudinal Variation in the Relationships Between Stomatal Traits and Leaf Functional Traits: A Case Study of Changbai Mountain.” Acta Ecologica Sinica 36, no. 8: 2175–2184. 10.5846/stxb201411042162. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, P. J. , Thompson K., and Hodgson J. G.. 2010. “Specific Leaf Area and Leaf Dry Matter Content as Alternative Predictors of Plant Strategies.” New Phytologist 143, no. 1: 155–162. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00427.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wright, I. , Reich P., Westoby M., et al. 2004. “The Worldwide Leaf Economics Spectrum.” Nature 428: 821–827. 10.1038/nature02403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright, I. J. , Ackerly D. D., Bongers F., et al. 2007. “Relationships Among Ecologically Important Dimensions of Plant Trait Variation in Seven Neotropical Forests.” Annals of Botany 99, no. 5: 1003–1015. 10.1093/aob/mcl066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiang, X. Y. , Wu G. L., Duan R. Y., et al. 2015. “Intraspecific and Interspecific Competition of Pinus dabeshanensis .” Acta Ecologica Sinica 35, no. 2: 389–395. 10.5846/stxb201401130102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, H. W. , Liu Q., Wang S. Y., et al. 2021. “A Global Meta‐Analysis of the Impacts of Exotic Plant Species Invasion on Plant Diversity and Soil Properties.” Science of the Total Environment 810: 9697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, M. S. , Huang H. X., Shi Q. R., et al. 2015. “Responses of Soil Water Content to Change in Plant Functional Traits in Evergreen Broadleaved Forests in Eastern Zhejiang Province.” Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 39, no. 9: 857–866. 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yan, J. W. , He Y. J., Jiao M., et al. 2024. “Leaf Trait Network Variations With Woody Species Diversity and Habitat Heterogeneity in Degraded Karst Forests.” Ecological Indicators 160: 1470. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111896. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang, K. , Huang J. H., Dong D., et al. 2010. “Foliar Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry of Plant Communities in Alpine Grasslands on the Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau.” Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 34, no. 1: 17–22. 10.1007/s12665-015-4519-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ying, T. S. 1994. “The Nature, Characteristics and Origin of Qinling Mountain Flora.” Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 5: 389–410. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M. , Wang J., and Kang X.. 2022. “Spatial Distribution Pattern of Dominant Tree Species in Different Disturbance Plots in the Changbai Mountain.” Scientific Reports 12: 14161. 10.1038/s41598-022-18621-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y. Q. , Li M. X., Zeng W. X., et al. 2025. “Effects of Low‐Altitude Transplantation on Leaf Functional Traits of Six Rhododendron Species.” Journal of Ecology 44, no. 3: 713–719. 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202503.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, G. P. , Liu G. Q., Bu W. J., et al. 2013. “Ecological Niche Modeling and Its Applications in Biodiversity Conservation.” Biodiversity Science 21, no. 1: 90–98. 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.09106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data S1: ece372185‐sup‐0001‐Supinfo01.xlsx.
Data S2: ece372185‐sup‐0002‐Supinfo02.xlsx.
Data S3: ece372185‐sup‐0003‐Supinfo03.xlsx.
Data S4: ece372185‐sup‐0004‐Supinfo04.xlsx.
Data S5: ece372185‐sup‐0005‐Supinfo05.xlsx.
Data S6: ece372185‐sup‐0006‐Supinfo06.xlsx.
Data S7: ece372185‐sup‐0007‐Supinfo07.xlsx.
Data Availability Statement
All the required data is uploaded as Supporting Information.
