Abstract
Two yeast strains, PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016, were isolated from soil from an Irish forest. Sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) of the rRNA gene repeat, and the D1/D2 domain of the LSU rRNA gene, showed that they belong to the Cyberlindnera and Barnettozyma genera of the order Phaffomycetales, but they did not exactly match any known species. The genomes of both isolates were sequenced using Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Illumina sequencing, generating chromosome-level genome assemblies. Phylogenomic analysis of 1,385 single-copy orthologues from 37 Phaffomycetales species and 2 outgroups showed that the closest relative of PYCC 10015 is Cyberlindnera galapagoensis and that PYCC 10016 is placed in a subclade containing 7 other species from the Barnettozyma genus. The average nucleotide identity between these strains and their closest relatives is <75%, supporting their designation as novel species. Here, we propose the names Cyberlindnera hibernica sp. nov. and Barnettozyma discipulorum sp. nov. for PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016, respectively.
Keywords: chromosomes, genome assembly, Illumina sequencing, nanopore sequencing, Phaffomycetales, phylogenomics, yeast
Data Summary
The internal transcribed spacer sequences (PQ384455 and PQ384456) and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene (PQ373936 and PQ373935) of Cyberlindnera hibernica PYCC 10015 and Barnettozyma discipulorum PYCC 10016 are available at the NCBI. Chromosome-level assemblies of strains C. hibernica PYCC 10015 and B. discipulorum PYCC 10016 can be found under BioProject PRJNA1167496. Genome annotation for these species is available on FigShare at the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27838869.
Introduction
Barnettozyma and Cyberlindnera are two genera within the order Phaffomycetales, containing 11 and 31 described species, respectively [1,2]. Species of these genera were initially placed in the genera Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis based on phenotypic similarities, but following molecular phylogenetic analysis by Kurtzman et al. [3], they were reassigned to newly proposed genera Barnettozyma and Lindnera. The name Lindnera was later replaced by Cyberlindnera due to a homonymous pre-existing plant taxon [4].
Cyberlindnera species are variable in habitat, but many are found in forest biomes in association with rotting wood [5,9]. Some are opportunistic pathogens such as Cyberlindnera fabianii, which can form antifungal-resistant biofilms and cause invasive bloodstream infections [10]. Barnettozyma species are also commonly found in decaying wood and plant matter [11,15].
Cyberlindnera species are known to ferment various sugars apart from glucose, including inulin, raffinose and sucrose [7,16, 17]. Both genera Cyberlindnera and Barnettozyma are of industrial interest because several species can metabolize xylose from lignocellulose biomass [1,13, 16, 18]. This can be exploited in the production of xylitol, a sugar substitute with various food and pharmaceutical applications [16,18]. Known species from both genera do not assimilate hexadecane or methanol [3].
The Cyberlindnera genus contains both homothallic and heterothallic species, which form Saturn-shaped and hat-shaped ascospores, respectively [5,8, 19]. Homothallic and heterothallic species of Barnettozyma have also been described with Saturn-shaped and hat-shaped ascospores, but it is not clear if ascospore shape is correlated with thallism in this genus [3,11].
In this study, two yeast strains PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 were isolated from forest soil samples collected in 2023 as part of undergraduate research projects conducted at the University College Dublin, Ireland. Divergence in both internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence and the D1/D2 domain of the LSU rRNA gene suggests that PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 represent novel species belonging to the Cyberlindnera and Barnettozyma genera, respectively, hereby proposed as Cyberlindnera hibernica and Barnettozyma discipulorum.
Methods
Isolation, cultivation and identification
Yeast strains were isolated from soil as described in Ryan et al. [20] and Bergin et al. [21]. Soil samples (~2 g each) were taken, using a clean trowel, from the bases of ten mature Irish sessile oak (Quercus petraea) trees at Glengarriff Woods Nature Reserve, County Cork, Ireland. The dominant habitat in this nature reserve is old oceanic sessile oak woodland. One sample was taken per tree, at a depth of ~3 cm below the surface, avoiding leaf litter. Glengarriff Woods is public land owned by the Irish state and is managed by the Irish National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), which does not require a permit for collecting micro-organisms.
In brief, ~0.5 g of soil was incubated in 9 ml yeast-peptone-dextrose (YPD) broth (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 2% glucose) containing antibiotics (chloramphenicol 30 µg ml−1 and ampicillin 100 µg ml−1) for 5 days at room temperature. These cultures were then mixed to homogeneity, and 10 µl of each was inoculated into fresh media for a further 2-day incubation at room temperature. To enrich for yeast species, dilutions were plated onto YPD agar (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% agar and 2% glucose) and incubated for a further 5 days at room temperature [22]. Plates containing large numbers of filamentous fungal colonies were discarded. Single colonies of potential yeast species were isolated for further investigation.
Sequence analysis of the ITS region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) of the rRNA gene repeat and the D1/D2 domain of the LSU rRNA gene was used for species identification. The ITS sequence of each yeast isolate was amplified from single colonies using primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [23]. D1/D2 sequences were amplified from cultures using primers NL1 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAA-3′) and NL4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′) [24]. Amplicons were sequenced with the Eurofins Genomics Mix2Seq platform using ITS1 and NL1 as primers. blast [25] was used to compare these sequences to known species included in the NCBI GenBank database [26]. Two isolates, PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016, lacked conclusive matches to known species in the GenBank database and were selected for further characterization. Phylogenetic analysis of ITS and D1/D2 sequences was done using the Seaview package (v. 5.0.4; [27]), with sequence alignment by muscle and tree construction by maximum likelihood (PhyML with the general-time reversible substitution model), using Seaview’s default parameters, with 100 bootstrap replicates.
Genome sequencing and assembly
To characterize the genomes of PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016, we sequenced their genomes using a combined Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)/Illumina sequencing strategy. For short-read Illumina sequencing, genomic DNA was extracted using a phenol–chloroform–isoamyl alcohol method as described in Bergin et al. [28]. Illumina libraries were prepared using Illumina DNA prep (Catalogue ID: 20018704) and indexed using IDT for Illumina indexes (Catalogue ID: 20027213). Genomes were sequenced in paired-end format (2×150 bp) using an Illumina NextSeq 2000 instrument. This generated 2,968,118 and 3,446,513 read pairs for PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016, respectively.
High molecular weight DNA for Nanopore sequencing was obtained using the MasterPure Yeast DNA Purification Kit (MPY80010; Biosearch Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing libraries were prepared from 1 µg of purified high molecular weight DNA per isolate using the Native Barcoding Sequencing Kit (SQK-NBD114-24; ONT). Libraries were sequenced using r10.4.1 chemistry flowcells (FLO-MIN114) on a MinION MK1C (ONT) device with MinKnow v. 23.07.12. Basecalling was performed using the fast configuration at default settings.
Nanopore sequencing data were filtered by average read quality and read length using NanoFilt v. 2.3.0 (ONT). Reads were filtered to minimum mean qualities of 7 for both species. Reads were filtered to minimum lengths of 1,000 bases for PYCC 10015 and to 5,000 bases for PYCC 10016. Data from both genomes were assembled using Canu v. 2.2 [29] with default settings. Initial assemblies were polished with NextPolish v. 1.4.1 [30] using short-read sequencing data. Five rounds of polishing were performed. Assemblies were filtered to remove repeated and degenerated contigs. Genome annotation of PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 was performed for phylogenomic analysis using the Yeast Genome Annotation Pipeline (YGAP) [31].
Phylogenomic analysis
The phylogeny of PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 and 37 other species was determined using a phylogenomic analysis. The 37 other species were chosen by reference to a recent phylogenomic analysis by Opulente et al. [2], and they include all the available sequenced genomes from species in the sections of the genera Barnettozyma and Cyberlindnera that appeared to be closest to PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 from initial blast and analysis of ITS and D1/D2 sequence data (Figs S1 and S2, available in the online Supplementary Material), as well as some other phylogenetic landmark species and two outgroups.
The phylogeny of all 39 species was determined using an alignment of 1,385 single-copy orthologs (SCOs) as described in Ryan et al. [20]. In brief, short proteins (<100 aa) and highly degenerated sequences (>10 internal stop codons) were first removed from the predicted proteomes of all 39 species. Protein sequences were grouped using blastp v. 2.10.0 [25], retaining those with E-value ≤1×10−10, per cent identity ≥30% and per cent match length ≥70%. Orthologue clustering was performed using OrthoMCL [32] with an inflation parameter of 1.5. Clustering identified 1,407 putative SCOs (gene clusters with one sequence per species) in all 39 species. Alignments of each SCO were generated using MAFFT v. 7.520 [33] with parameters ‘--maxiterate 1000’ to run 1,000 iterations of alignment and ‘--genafpair’ to use the global pairwise alignment strategy. TrimAL v. 1.4.rev15 [34] was used to trim alignments using the ‘-gappyout’ parameter to remove highly gapped columns in alignment. Individual SCO trees were generated using RAxML v. 8.2.12 [35] with parameters ‘-N 5’ to specify the number of independent tree searches, ‘-m PROTGAMMAAUTO’ to automatically select the best substitution model and ‘-p 12345’ to set the seed. Individual SCO trees were rooted using the outgroup species Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C and Hanseniaspora osmophila NRRL Y-1613 [2]. Tree topologies were automatically assessed using the ETE Toolkit in Python [36], and SCOs whose trees did not contain a branch separating a monophyletic Phaffomycetales from these two outgroups were discarded from further analysis. Trimmed alignments of the remaining 1,385 SCOs were concatenated, and the species-level phylogeny was calculated using RAxML [35] with parameters ‘-m PROTGAMMALG -N 5 -# 100 p 12345’, to set the substitution model to PROTGAMMALG, the number of independent tree searches to 5, the number of bootstraps to 100 and the seed to 12,345. The final bootstrapped tree (Fig. 1) was visualized in iTOL [37].
Fig. 1. Phylogenomic tree created from 1,385 SCOs from 37 Phaffomycetales species and 2 outgroup species, S. cerevisiae S288C and H. osmophila NRRL Y-1613. Genome assembly accession numbers are shown in parentheses at each terminal node. The tree is rooted using the outgroup species. All bootstrap values are 100%. The Barnettozyma and Cyberlindnera clades are colored in blue and gold, respectively. Novel species C. hibernica sp. nov. PYCC 10015 and B. discipulorum sp. nov. PYCC 10016 are marked in bold text. The scale bar shows 0.1 aa substitutions per site.
Physiological characterization
Standard procedures were followed for phenotypic characterization [38]. Assimilation and fermentation tests were performed in liquid media. Fermentation was ascertained by gas formation in Durham tubes. Phase-contrast optics were used for microscopy.
Results and discussion
Sequence analysis of ITS and D1/D2 regions of rRNA genes
Among 106 yeast isolates from Irish soil samples that were collected during our undergraduate student module in 2023, sequence analysis of the ITS region of the rRNA gene array detected 42 known species, predominantly in the genera Kazachstania, Saccharomyces, Barnettozyma and Hanseniaspora (Table S1). Two yeast isolates, PYCC 10015 (original designation: UCD1070) and PYCC 10016 (original designation: UCD2008), were identified as members of the genera Cyberlindnera and Barnettozyma, respectively. However, their ITS and the D1/D2 sequences did not have 100% matches to any sequences in the GenBank database. Both of these isolates came from samples from the same forest, Glengarriff Woods in County Cork, Ireland. We investigated ten soil samples from Glengarriff Woods, each from the base of a different oak tree, and isolated a total of seven known yeast species from these samples (Table S1), in addition to PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016. No other yeast species were isolated from the soil samples that yielded PYCC 10015 (soil sample GGW10) and PYCC 10016 (soil sample GGW4).
For PYCC 10015, phylogenetic analysis of the ITS and D1/D2 sequences indicated that this isolate is closely related to Cyberlindnera qingyuanensis [17] and Cyberlindnera galapagoensis [16], as well as having high sequence similarity to some database sequences that do not correspond to formally described species (Fig. S1). In blastn searches against the NCBI database, the ITS sequence of PYCC 10015 (PQ384455; 585 bp) had the highest similarity to that of C. qingyuanensis NYNU 223283T with 14.6% divergence (85.4% identity and 93% coverage; 27 substitutions and 59 indels, excluding the regions bound by the PCR primers). Its D1/D2 sequence (PQ373936; 574 bp) had the highest similarity to that of Cyberlindnera sp. CHS-2017a with 5.6% divergence (94.4% identity and 98% coverage; 18 substitutions and 14 indels).
For PYCC 10016, phylogenetic analysis of the ITS and D1/D2 sequences indicated that it is closely related to several Barnettozyma species (Fig. S2). In blastn searches against the NCBI database, the ITS sequence of PYCC 10016 (PQ384456; 565 bp) had the highest similarity to that of Barnettozyma vustinii CBS 11554T with 15.6% divergence (84.4% identity and 74% coverage; 30 substitutions and 100 indels), and its D1/D2 sequence (PQ373935; 584 bp) had the highest similarity to that of Barnettozyma populi NRRL Y-12728T with 8.5% divergence (91.5% identity and 99% coverage; 15 substitutions and 38 indels).
The extent of sequence divergence from known species in the ITS and D1/D2 regions suggested that both PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 represent new species. They substantially exceed the levels of divergence between some accepted pairs of species in the same genera (for example, we calculate that there is only 2% divergence between the ITS sequences of Cyberlindnera saturnus and Cyberlindnera subsufficiens and only 3% divergence between the D1/D2 sequences of B. vustinii and Barnettozyma xylosica). However, because we have only one isolate of each potential new species, we also sequenced their whole genomes to clarify their relationships.
Genome sequence comparisons and phylogenetic placement
To further characterize the isolates and investigate their relationship to known species, we used whole-genome sequencing using both Illumina and ONT to generate chromosome-level assemblies. Both assemblies consist of seven nuclear chromosomes and the mitochondrial genome (Table 1).
Table 1. Genome assembly statistics.
| Strain | No. of chromosomes | Genome size (bp) | N50 (bp) | % G+C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. hibernica sp. nov. PYCC 10015 | 7 nuclear, 1 mtDNA | 11,516,225 | 1,955,003 | 48.56 |
| B. discipulorum sp. nov. PYCC 10016 | 7 nuclear, 1 mtDNA | 11,658,228 | 1,671,570 | 43.28 |
To place PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 within the order Phaffomycetales, a phylogenomic analysis was performed using SCOs from them and 37 other genome sequence assemblies. The analyzed dataset included all the genome assemblies that were available for species that were suggested by phylogenetic analysis of the ITS or D1/D2 sequences to be close relatives of PYCC 10015 or PYCC 10016 (Figs S1 and S2). The phylogenomic tree (Fig. 1) shows that PYCC 10015 belongs to the genus Cyberlindnera and is sister to C. galapagoensis CBS 13997T; there is 100% bootstrap support for the clade containing these two species. PYCC 10016 lies within the Barnettozyma clade and is sister to a clade containing seven other species (Candida sanyiensis CBS 10592T, Barnettozyma sp. yHDO593, Barnettozyma hawaiiensis NRRL Y-27270T, Barnettozyma californica NRRL Y-17395T, B. vustinii CBS 11554T, Barnettozyma sucrosica CBS 11512T and B. populi NRRL Y-12728T). There are bootstrap support values of 100% both for the branch defining this clade of eight species and for the branch separating PYCC 10016 from the other seven (Fig. 1).
For the species with sequenced genomes shown in Fig. 1, we investigated genomic similarity by calculating pairwise average nt identity (ANI) and average aa identity (AAI) values within the Cyberlindnera clade and within the Barnettozyma clade (Tables S2 and S3), using the programs OrthoANI v. 0.5.0 [39] for ANI and CompareM v. 0.1.2 (https://github.com/donovan-h-parks/CompareM) for AAI. In Cyberlindnera, PYCC 10015 has the highest genomic similarity values to C. galapagoensis CBS 13997T (ANI 0.732 and AAI 0.692), which agrees with its position on the phylogenomic tree. These values are lower than the ANI and AAI values seen between several other pairs of species in the genus Cyberlindnera and similar to the mean interspecies values among the analysed Cyberlindnera species (Table S2). In Barnettozyma, the ANIs of PYCC 10016 to its seven sister species range from 0.718 to 0.746, and the AAIs range from 0.692 to 0.737, with the highest similarities being to B. vustinii CBS 11554T (Table S3). These values are lower than those observed between several pairs of accepted Barnettozyma species, which can be as high as 0.840 (ANI) or 0.872 (AAI), and they are similar to the mean interspecies ANI and AAI values among this group of species. In our opinion, the ANI and AAI values calculated from the genome sequences of PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 further suggest that they belong to novel species.
The AAI values for PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 can be compared with the AAI values for Saccharomycetales species reported in a recent comprehensive analysis by Liu et al. [40], which used the same method to compute AAI. The highest AAI values we observed for the new Phaffomycetales isolates were 0.692 for PYCC 10015 versus C. galapagoensis and 0.737 for PYCC 10016 versus B. vustinii (Tables S2 and S3). Many pairs of Saccharomycetales species have AAI values that are higher than these: values higher than 0.692 occur (for some species pairs) in every 1 of the 13 studied Saccharomycetales genera, and values higher than 0.737 occur in 11 of the 13 genera [40]. Thus, the AAIs of PYCC 10015 and PYCC 10016 to their closest relatives are consistent with AAI levels that correspond to interspecies divergences, in Saccharomycetales as well as in Phaffomycetales, and support the contention that they represent new species.
Metabolic profiling
The metabolic profile of PYCC 10015 is consistent with other members of the Cyberlindnera genus [5,9,41]. Assimilation of cellobiose and d-xylose suggests an association with rotting wood as expected from the isolation environment [42]. PYCC 10015 can be differentiated from related species C. galapagoensis CBS 13997T and C. qingyuanensis NYNU 223283T [16,17] in that maltose is weakly assimilated and that inulin, succinate and citrate are not assimilated. PYCC 10015 grows on 10% NaCl, whereas C. galapagoensis CBS 13997T shows limited growth and C. qingyuanensis NYNU 223283T does not.
The metabolic profile of PYCC 10016 is similar to that of other Barnettozyma species [43]. It can be differentiated from closely related species B. vustinii CBS 11554T and B. sucrosica CBS 11512T [11,44] in that PYCC 10016 cannot ferment glucose, nor can it assimilate l-sorbose, d-xylose or l-rhamnose; ribitol assimilation is weak and lactose can be assimilated (weakly and delayed). It can assimilate cellobiose, salicin, l-lysine and cadaverine, suggesting an association with plant decomposition which is in accord with its environment of isolation [42].
As expected, neither PYCC 10015 nor PYCC 10016 can assimilate methanol [3]. Differentiation from closely related species in carbon and nitrogen source preferences further suggests that these isolates are novel species.
Taxonomy
Description of Barnettozyma discipulorum A.P. Ryan, C. Carvalho, Y. Zhao, J. Decuseara, M. Osborne, P. Heneghan, K.P. Byrne, K.H. Wolfe, T. Ó Cróinín, J.P. Sampaio & G. Butler sp. nov.
MycoBank MB 856422. Fig. 2a.
Fig. 2. Budding cells of B. discipulorum sp. nov. PYCC 10016 (a) and C. hibernica sp. nov. PYCC 10015 (b), grown on YM agar at 25 °C for 2 days, and detail of a hypha of C. hibernica PYCC 10015 (c) formed on corn meal agar after 2 weeks of incubation at 18 °C. Scale bars=5 µm.
Barnettozyma discipulorum (dis.ci.pu.lo′rum. L. gen. pl. n. discipulorum, of students, named for the undergraduate students integral to its discovery).
Typification: Ireland: County Cork: Glengarriff Woods Nature Reserve, 51.755050, –9.567230, surface soil (3 cm) in a histic horizon, at the base of a mature Q. petraea tree in an oak forest, 1 September 2023, G. Butler. The holotype, PYCC 10016-H, is permanently maintained in a metabolically inactive state in the Portuguese Yeast Culture Collection (PYCC), Caparica, Portugal. The ex-holotype cultures are PYCC 10016 (at PYCC), CBS 18649 (at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands) and UCD2008 (at University College Dublin, Ireland). GenBank accession numbers PQ384456 (ITS), PQ373935 (D1/D2 domain of LSU) and JBIEIB000000000 (genome).
Culture characteristics: After 7 days of growth on yeast-malt (YM) agar (0.3% yeast extract, 0.3% malt extract, 0.5% peptone, 1% dextrose and 2% agar) at 25 °C, the streak culture is smooth, cream-colored and butyrous, and colonies have an entire margin. After 3 days of growth on YM agar at 25 °C, cells are ellipsoidal to sub-globose (6–3×4–3 µm) and budding is frequently polar (Fig. 2a). On Dalmau plates after 2 weeks at 18 °C, no pseudohyphae nor true hyphae are formed. Asci and ascospores were not observed after prolonged incubation (2 months) on YM agar, 5% maltose agar, acetate agar and corn meal agar at 18 °C.
Physiological and biochemical characteristics: Glucose is not fermented. Carbon compounds assimilated: d-glucose, cellobiose, salicin, lactose (delayed and weak), glycerol, ribitol (delayed), xylitol (delayed), d-glucitol, d-mannitol, galactitol (delayed), d-glucono-1,5-lactone, dl-lactate, succinate, citrate (delayed), ethanol and l-malic acid. Carbon compounds not assimilated: d-galactose, l-sorbose, d-glucosamine, d-ribose, d-xylose, l-arabinose, d-arabinose, l-rhamnose, sucrose, maltose, α,α-trehalose, methyl α-d-glucoside, melibiose, raffinose, melezitose, inulin, soluble starch, erythritol, myo-inositol, d-gluconate, d-glucuronate, methanol, l-tartaric acid and protocatechuic acid. Nitrogen compounds assimilated: nitrate, nitrite, ethylamine, l-lysine and cadaverine. Nitrogen compounds not assimilated: creatine and creatinine. Growth in the presence of 10% NaCl. No growth in the presence of 0.01% cycloheximide and in the absence of vitamins. Growth is positive but weak at 30 °C and negative at 35 °C. Starch-like compounds are not produced. Hydrolysis of urea and diazonium blue B (DBB) reaction are negative.
Description of Cyberlindnera hibernica A.P. Ryan, C. Carvalho, Y. Zhao, J. Decuseara, M. Osborne, P. Heneghan, K.P. Byrne, K.H. Wolfe, T. Ó Cróinín, J.P. Sampaio & G. Butler sp. nov.
MycoBank MB 856421. Fig. 2(b, c).
Cyberlindnera hibernica (hi.ber′ni.ca. L. fem. adj. hibernica, of Ireland).
Typification: Ireland: County Cork: Glengarriff Woods Nature Reserve, 51.757080, –9.567610, surface soil (3 cm) in a histic horizon, at the base of a mature Q. petraea tree in an oak forest, 1 September 2023, G. Butler. The holotype, PYCC 10015-H, is permanently maintained in a metabolically inactive state in the Portuguese Yeast Culture Collection (PYCC), Caparica, Portugal. The ex-holotype cultures are PYCC 10015 (at PYCC), CBS 18648 (at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands) and UCD1070 (at University College Dublin, Ireland). GenBank accession numbers PQ384455 (ITS), PQ373936 (D1/D2 domain of LSU) and JBIEIC000000000 (genome).
Culture characteristics: After 7 days of growth on YM agar at 25 °C, the streak culture is smooth, cream-colored and butyrous, and colonies have an entire margin. After 3 days of growth on YM agar at 25 °C, cells are ellipsoidal (6–4×4–2 µm) and budding is frequently multilateral (Fig. 2b). On Dalmau plates after 2 weeks at 18 °C, true hyphae are formed, and they grow into the agar (Fig. 2c). Asci and ascospores were not observed after prolonged incubation (2 months) on YM agar, 5% maltose agar, acetate agar and corn meal agar at 18 °C.
Physiological and biochemical characteristics: Glucose and sucrose are fermented. Compounds not fermented: galactose, maltose, methyl α-d-glucoside, α,α-trehalose, melibiose, lactose, cellobiose, melezitose and raffinose. Carbon compounds assimilated: d-glucose, d-xylose, sucrose, maltose (weak), cellobiose, salicin, raffinose, glycerol, xylitol, d-glucitol, d-mannitol, galactitol (delayed), d-gluconate, dl-lactate, ethanol and l-malic acid. Carbon compounds not assimilated: d-galactose, l-sorbose, d-glucosamine, d-ribose, l-arabinose, d-arabinose, l-rhamnose, α,α-trehalose, methyl α-d-glucoside, melibiose, lactose, melezitose, inulin, soluble starch, erythritol, ribitol, myo-inositol, d-glucono-1,5-lactone, d-glucuronate, succinate, citrate, methanol and l-tartaric acid. Nitrogen compounds assimilated: ethylamine, l-lysine and cadaverine. Nitrogen compounds not assimilated: nitrate, nitrite, creatine and cadaverine. Growth in the presence of 10% NaCl. No growth in the presence of 0.01% cycloheximide and in the absence of vitamins. Growth is positive at 25 °C and negative at 30 °C. Starch-like compounds are not produced. Hydrolysis of urea and DBB reaction are negative.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The contribution of all the undergraduate students participating in GENE30060 and GENE30070 modules is acknowledged. Illumina sequencing was carried out in the Genomics Core of the Conway Institute, UCD, with the assistance of Senior Technical Officer Alison Murphy. We thank Ana Pontes for the help in preparing photos for publication.
Abbreviations
- AAI
average aa identity
- ANI
average nt identity
- DBB
diazonium blue B
- ITS
internal transcribed spacer
- ONT
Oxford Nanopore Technologies
- SCO
single-copy orthologue
- T
ex-type culture
- YM
yeast-malt
- YPD
yeast-peptone-dextrose
Footnotes
Funding: This work was supported by Science Foundation Ireland (grant nos. 19/FFP/6668 and 20/FFP-A/8795), the Irish Research Council and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal) grants UIDB-UIDP/04378/2020 (UCIBIO) and LA/P/0140/2020 (i4HB).
Contributor Information
Adam P. Ryan, Email: adam.ryan1@ucdconnect.ie.
Cláudia Carvalho, Email: pycc@fct.unl.pt.
Yiran Zhao, Email: Yiran.Zhao2@ucdconnect.ie.
Julianna Decuseara, Email: Julianna.Decuseara@ucdconnect.ie.
Matthieu Osborne, Email: Matthieu.Osborne@ucdconnect.ie.
Padraic G. Heneghan, Email: Padraic.Heneghan@ucdconnect.ie.
Kevin P. Byrne, Email: Kevin.Byrne@ucd.ie.
Tadhg Ó Cróinín, Email: tadhg.ocroinin@ucd.ie.
Kenneth H. Wolfe, Email: Kenneth.Wolfe@ucd.ie.
José Paulo Sampaio, Email: jss@fct.unl.pt.
Geraldine Butler, Email: gbutler@ucd.ie.
References
- 1.Arrey G, Li G, Murphy R, Guimaraes L, Alizadeh S, et al. Isolation, characterization, and genome assembly of Barnettozyma botsteinii sp. nov. and novel strains of Kurtzmaniella quercitrusa isolated from the intestinal tract of the termite Macrotermes bellicosus. G3. 2021;11:jkab342. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Opulente DA, LaBella AL, Harrison M-C, Wolters JF, Liu C, et al. Genomic factors shape carbon and nitrogen metabolic niche breadth across Saccharomycotina yeasts. Science. 2024;384:eadj4503. doi: 10.1126/science.adj4503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, Basehoar-Powers E. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene sequence analysis, and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:939–954. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00419.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Minter DW. Cyberlindnera, a replacement name for lindnera kurtzman et al., nom. illegit. Mycotaxon. 2009;110:473–476. doi: 10.5248/110.473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cadete RM, Cheab MAM, Santos RO, Safar SVB, Zilli JE, et al. Cyberlindnera xylosilytica sp. nov., a xylitol-producing yeast species isolated from lignocellulosic materials. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:2968–2974. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boontham W, Limtong S, Rosa CA, Lopes MR, Vital MJS, et al. Cyberlindnera tropicalis f.a., sp. nov., a novel yeast isolated from tropical regions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:2569–2573. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zheng J, Lu YF, Liu XJ, Hui FL. Cyberlindnera xishuangbannaensis f.a., sp. nov., a yeast isolated from rotting wood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:5051–5055. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barros KO, Souza RM, Palladino F, Cadete RM, Santos ARO, et al. Cyberlindnera dasilvae sp. nov., a xylitol-producing yeast species isolated from rotting wood and frass of cerambycid larva. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brysch-Herzberg M, Dlauchy D, Seidel M, Péter G. Cyberlindnera sylvatica sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from forest habitats. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arastehfar A, Fang W, Al-Hatmi AMS, Afsarian MH, Daneshnia F, et al. Unequivocal identification of an underestimated opportunistic yeast species, Cyberlindnera fabianii, and its close relatives using a dual-function PCR and literature review of published cases. Med Mycol. 2019;57:833–840. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myy148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Imanishi Y, Yamazaki A, Nakase T. A new Barnettozyma species forming hat-shaped ascospores isolated from soil in Japan. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2010;56:447–453. doi: 10.2323/jgam.56.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Polburee P, Yongmanitchai W, Ohashi T, Fujiyama K, Limtong S. Barnettozyma siamensis f.a., sp. nov., a lipid-accumulating ascomycete yeast species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:3053–3057. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.065342-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kobayashi R, Kanti A, Kawasaki H. Three novel species of d-xylose-assimilating yeasts, Barnettozyma xylosiphila sp. nov., Barnettozyma xylosica sp. nov. and Wickerhamomyces xylosivorus f.a., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:3971–3976. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mullen AA, Lynch CD, Hill SM, Holohan CP, Ó Cróinín T, et al. Draft genome sequences of two natural isolates of the yeast Barnettozyma californica from Ireland, UCD09 and UCD89. Genome Announc. 2018;6:e00548-18. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00548-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Qiao YZ, Chen X, Hui FL. Barnettozyma menglunensis f.a., sp. nov., a novel yeast species isolated from rotting wood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023;73 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guamán-Burneo MC, Dussán KJ, Cadete RM, Cheab MAM, Portero P, et al. Xylitol production by yeasts isolated from rotting wood in the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador, and description of Cyberlindnera galapagoensis f.a., sp. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek . 2015;108:919–931. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0546-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu S, Cai DY, Hui FL. Cyberlindnera qingyuanensis f.a., sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from rotting wood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Arruda PV, Rodrigues R de CLB, da Silva DDV, Felipe M das G de A. Evaluation of hexose and pentose in pre-cultivation of Candida guilliermondii on the key enzymes for xylitol production in sugarcane hemicellulosic hydrolysate. Biodegradation. 2011;22:815–822. doi: 10.1007/s10532-010-9397-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Golubev WI. Mycocinotyping of Cyberlindnera Species. Microbiology . 2021;90:226–228. doi: 10.1134/S0026261721010069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ryan AP, Groenewald M, Smith MTh, Holohan C, Boekhout T, et al. Genome analysis of a newly discovered yeast species, Hanseniaspora menglaensis. JoF . 2024;10:180. doi: 10.3390/jof10030180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bergin SA, Allen S, Hession C, Ó Cinnéide E, Ryan A, et al. Identification of European isolates of the lager yeast parent Saccharomyces eubayanus. FEMS Yeast Res. 2022;22:foac053. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foac053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sylvester K, Wang Q-M, James B, Mendez R, Hulfachor AB, et al. Temperature and host preferences drive the diversification of Saccharomyces and other yeasts: a survey and the discovery of eight new yeast species. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15:fov002. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xie J, Fu Y, Jiang D, Li G, Huang J, et al. Intergeneric transfer of ribosomal genes between two fungi. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leaw SN, Chang HC, Sun HF, Barton R, Bouchara J-P, et al. Identification of medically important yeast species by sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer regions. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:693–699. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.693-699.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sayers EW, Beck J, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Chan J, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:D20–D29. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:221–224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bergin SA, Zhao F, Ryan AP, Müller CA, Nieduszynski CA, et al. Systematic analysis of copy number variations in the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis identifies a gene amplification in RTA3 that is associated with drug resistance. mBio . 2022;13:e0177722. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01777-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hu J, Fan J, Sun Z, Liu S. NextPolish: a fast and efficient genome polishing tool for long-read assembly. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2253–2255. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Proux-Wéra E, Armisén D, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. A pipeline for automated annotation of yeast genome sequences by a conserved-synteny approach. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13:237. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13:2178–2189. doi: 10.1101/gr.1224503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Huerta-Cepas J, Serra F, Bork P. ETE 3: reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1635–1638. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, Robert V. In: The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study. 5th edition. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. Methods for isolation, phenotypic characterization and maintenance of yeasts; pp. 87–110. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu F, Hu Z-D, Yurkov A, Chen X-H, Bao W-J, et al. Saccharomycetaceae: delineation of fungal genera based on phylogenomic analyses, genomic relatedness indices and genomics-based synapomorphies. Persoonia. 2024;52:1–21. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2024.52.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kurtzman CP. In: The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. Lindnera Kurtzman, Robnett & Basehoar-Powers (2008) pp. 521–543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mouro A, Cadete RM, Santos RO, Rosa CA, Stambuk BU. Xylose and cellobiose fermentation by yeasts isolated from the Brazilian biodiversity. BMC Proc. 2014;8:202. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-8-S4-P202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kurtzman CP. In: The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. Barnettozyma Kurtzman, Robnett & Basehoar-Powers (2008) pp. 333–339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yurkov AM. Barnettozyma vustinii. Persoonia. 2009;23:188–189. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


