Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2025 Jun 30;202:109647. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109647

Prenatal exposure to phthalates and alternative plasticizers and emotional and behavioral outcomes in early childhood in the Environmental influences on Child Health outcomes (ECHO) cohort

Jiwon Oh a, Jessie P Buckley b, Sudhi Upadhyaya c, Kurunthachalam Kannan d,e, Emily S Barrett f,g, Theresa M Bastain h, Carrie V Breton h, Stephanie M Eick i, Sarah Dee Geiger j, Akhgar Ghassabian k,l, Rima Habre h, Julie B Herbstman m, Deborah Hirtz n, Donghai Liang i, Kaja LeWinn o, John D Meeker p, Thomas G O’Connor q, Irva Hertz-Picciotto a,r, Douglas Ruden s, Sheela Sathyanarayana t, Susan L Schantz u, Julie B Schweitzer r,v, Anat Sigal w, Tracey J Woodruff x, Qi Zhao y, Rebecca J Schmidt a,r, Deborah H Bennett a,*; for the ECHO Cohort Consortium
PMCID: PMC12452813  NIHMSID: NIHMS2108780  PMID: 40617232

Abstract

Background:

Evidence suggests prenatal phthalate exposure adversely affects children’s behavior. However, epidemiological studies on alternative plasticizers remain scarce. This study investigated associations of gestational exposure to phthalates and alternative plasticizers with internalizing and externalizing behaviors in children aged 1.5–5 years.

Methods:

The study included 2617 mother–child dyads from 13 Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) cohorts. Maternal urine samples, primarily collected mid- to late-pregnancy, were analyzed for 27 phthalate metabolites and 6 alternative plasticizer metabolites. Based on detection frequency, metabolite concentrations were modeled either continuously or categorically (Group 1: non-detectable, 2: lower detectable, 3: higher detectable). Covariate-adjusted associations between individual metabolite concentrations and internalizing and externalizing T-scores on the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1½–5 were estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Effect modification by child sex was also examined.

Results:

An interquartile range increase in mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP) and membership in Group 3, versus Group 1, for mono-hexyl phthalate (MHxP) were associated with higher externalizing T-scores (βext for continuous MBzP = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.05, 1.00; βext for MHxP Group 3 = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.35, 2.12). We observed no robust associations between phthalate metabolites and internalizing T-scores, nor between cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono carboxyisooctyl ester (DINCH) metabolites and any behavioral outcomes. Child sex modified associations between several metabolites and externalizing T-scores, although the direction of effect varied by metabolite.

Conclusion:

This large-scale study suggests that prenatal exposure to several phthalates, but not to the alternative plasticizer DINCH, may be associated with a small-to-modest increase in externalizing behaviors in young children.

Keywords: Phthalates, Alternative plasticizers, Pregnancy, Behaviors, Neurodevelopment

1. Introduction

Phthalates are a group of high-production-volume chemicals primarily used as plasticizers in various industrial and consumer products (Heudorf et al., 2007). High-molecular-weight phthalates are commonly found in toys, childcare articles, food packaging materials, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, vinyl flooring, wall covering, and automotive components, while low-molecular-weight phthalates are found in adhesives, coatings, and personal care products such as cosmetics, perfumes, lotions, shampoos, and nail polish (Meeker et al., 2009; Wang and Qian, 2021; Wang et al., 2019). Due to the adverse health effects of phthalate exposure (Benjamin et al., 2017; Hauser and Calafat, 2005; Heudorf et al., 2007; Lyche et al., 2009; Wang and Qian, 2021), the European Union, the United States (U.S.), and several other countries have implemented regulations or recommendations to restrict the use of specific phthalates in children’s products and food contact materials (Tumu et al., 2023; Wang and Qian, 2021). Although exposure to several phthalates has decreased over the last two decades (Domínguez-Romero et al., 2023; Jiang et al., 2023; Kasper-Sonnenberg et al., 2019; Vogel et al., 2023), phthalates remain widely detected in the general population and among pregnant women (Wang et al., 2019), potentially posing risks to children’s health (Almeida-Toledano et al., 2024; Wang and Qian, 2021). Furthermore, exposure to alternative plasticizers, such as di-iso-nonyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) and di (2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHTP), has increased (Domínguez-Romero et al., 2023; Jiang et al., 2023; Kasper-Sonnenberg et al., 2019). Despite limited research, the endocrine-disrupting potential and toxicities of these alternative plasticizers have been reported (Gerofke et al., 2024; Qadeer et al., 2024).

Phthalates can cross the placenta and impact the developing fetus during crucial periods of neurodevelopment, when the fetal brain is particularly susceptible to environmental toxicants (Lucaccioni et al., 2021). Rodent studies suggest that there are neurobehavioral effects of perinatal phthalate exposure at doses higher than environmentally relevant levels but well below toxic doses, often showing sex-specific effects (Engel et al., 2021; Hlisníková et al., 2021; Mustieles et al., 2023). For example, perinatal exposure to di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) increased anxiety- and/or depressive-like behaviors in male rats and both sexes of mice (Carbone et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2015). Female rats perinatally exposed to di-iso-nonyl phthalate (DiNP) exhibited masculinization of learning behavior (Boberg et al., 2011). A mixture of DEHP, DiNP, and dibutyl phthalate impaired social behaviors, particularly in females (Morová et al., 2020). Evidence on the neurotoxic effects of alternative plasticizers is limited, although several experimental studies have reported that DINCH has endocrine-disrupting potential (Campioli et al., 2015; Campioli et al., 2017; Engel et al., 2018; Zughaibi et al., 2022) and can induce behavioral changes in zebrafish larvae (Saad et al., 2021).

Accumulating epidemiological research largely supports the link between gestational phthalate exposure and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children (Ejaredar et al., 2015; Engel et al., 2021; Minatoya and Kishi, 2021). Most studies focusing on early childhood behavior have observed adverse associations for several phthalate metabolites (Choi et al., 2021; Cohen-Eliraz et al., 2023; Day et al., 2021; Dewey et al., 2023; Engel et al., 2010; England-Mason et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2018; Ku et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Philippat et al., 2017; Singer et al., 2017; Tsai et al., 2023), with only a few studies reporting null or inverse associations (Andreasen et al., 2023; Gascon et al., 2015; Minatoya et al., 2018). However, there is a limited number of studies examining the neurodevelopmental impacts of alternative plasticizers, which may be replacing phthalates, calling for timely research on this topic (Colicino et al., 2021; Guilbert et al., 2021; Özel et al., 2023; Park et al., 2023).

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) consortium provides a collaborative framework that was initiated with 69 U.S. pregnancy and pediatric cohorts with over 107,000 participants to understand the impacts of environmental exposures on child health outcomes (Knapp et al., 2023). A recent large-scale study combining data from three ECHO cohorts found that a phthalate mixture and several individual metabolites in prenatal maternal urine were weakly associated with higher total problem scores at 4–6 years of age, with more pronounced effects observed among males (Barrett et al., 2024). However, that study did not measure alternative plasticizers and used total problem scores, which sum the scores of externalizing, internalizing, sleep problems, and other behavioral scales. Therefore, our study expands on this work by investigating an extensive set of phthalate and alternative plasticizer metabolites to determine their associations with internalizing and externalizing behaviors in young children, using a larger, geographically and sociodemographically diverse ECHO population from 13 cohorts. Secondarily, we examined two potential effect modifiers: (a) child sex, based on previous sex-dimorphic associations (Jankowska et al., 2021; Palanza et al., 2021), and (b) the child opportunity index (COI), a measure of neighborhood-level resources and conditions, given that disparities in neighborhood factors may amplify the effects of phthalate exposure through co-occurring stressors, potentially influencing neurodevelopment (Barrett and Padula, 2019; Dickerson et al., 2023; Galvez et al., 2018; Payne-Sturges et al., 2023).

2. Methods

2.1. Study population

This study initially considered ECHO cohorts that (a) contributed prenatal maternal urine samples for the quantification of a multi-class chemical panel measuring more than 100 contemporary and emerging chemicals, including phthalate and alternative plasticizer metabolites, and (b) assessed children’s behaviors at ages 1.5–5 years using the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1½–5 (CBCL/1½–5). Among the 14,426 biological mother–child dyads (hereafter referred to as mother–child dyads) from 16 cohorts meeting these criteria (Supplementary Fig. S1), not all samples collected by the cohorts could be analyzed due to budgetary constraints. Accordingly, each cohort selected either a single spot or first morning void sample per participant, with some larger cohorts limiting their selection to a subset of eligible pregnancies based on their own criteria. We excluded participants with samples not chosen for chemical analysis (n = 10,130); those with missing sample collection dates, specific gravity data, or phthalate biomarker concentrations (n = 11) (described below); and those for whom samples were collected on or after the delivery date (n = 41). We further excluded participants without complete CBCL/1½–5 data (n = 1590). Finally, after excluding three cohorts with small sample sizes (n < 30), the final sample consisted of 2617 mother–child dyads from 13 cohorts. This included all singleton births (n = 2596), and for families with twins or multiple siblings, one randomly selected twin or only the eldest child was included (n = 21). Information on the study characteristics of these 13 cohorts is provided in Supplementary Table S1. Over 90% of maternal urine samples were collected during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. We analyzed data collected and harmonized by ECHO before October 2023.

The study protocol received approval from either the ECHO single Institutional Review Board (IRB) or the local IRB of each cohort. Each cohort was responsible for obtaining written informed consent from the pregnant participants and, if necessary, the children’s parents or guardians. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health IRB reviewed and approved the work of the ECHO Data Analysis Center (DAC).

2.2. Quantification of urinary metabolites of phthalates and alternative plasticizers

Each cohort stored urine samples at −80 °C and shipped aliquots of urine samples from pregnant participants on dry ice to the Human Health Exposure Analysis Resource (HHEAR) laboratory for the quantification of phthalate and alternative plasticizer metabolites. Detailed methods on sample preparation and instrumental analysis are described elsewhere (Zhu et al., 2021). Briefly, 500 μL urine aliquots were spiked with an isotope-labeled internal standard mixture and β-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase. After incubation, the samples were extracted using ABS ELUT-Nexus cartridges (Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, USA), concentrated, and reconstituted. The target compounds were analyzed using an ExionLC system (SCIEX, Redwood City, CA, USA) coupled with an AB SCIEX QTRAP 5500+ triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source in both positive and negative modes. A total of 33 metabolites were quantified, including 27 phthalate metabolites and six alternative plasticizer metabolites. Mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP) and mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) co-eluted and were therefore quantified as a composite. The limits of detection (LODs) for the metabolites ranged from 0.01 ng/mL to 0.35 ng/mL, except for phthalic acid (5 ng/mL).

Along with procedural blanks, two reagent blanks, matrix blanks, and matrix spikes were analyzed with each batch. As trace levels of several metabolites were detected in reagent blanks, the blank concentrations were subtracted from the study sample concentrations. Additionally, three replicates of HHEAR quality control (QC) pools (A/B), one of each Standard Reference Material (SRM3672/SRM3673, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and 136 pairs of blinded duplicate aliquots from participants were analyzed for quality control purposes (Kannan et al., 2021). The coefficients of variation (CVs) for HHEAR QC pools A and B ranged from 6% to 24%, except for mono 2-ethyl hexyl phthalate (MEHP) (50–55%) (Supplementary Table S2). Mean recoveries of analytes from SRM samples ranged from 86% to 119%. A relative percent difference (RPD=|sample result − repeat result|/[sample result + repeat result]*100) was calculated for each duplicate aliquot pair when a metabolite was detected above the LOD in both duplicates, with RPDs ranging from 5% to 26% (Supplementary Table S2).

2.3. Child behavior assessment

The CBCL/1½–5, also known as the CBCL preschool form, is a widely used questionnaire for assessing children’s emotional and behavioral problems, with reliability and validity established across multiple cultures (Achenbach, 2000; Campagna et al., 2023). Caregivers score 99 items on a three-point Likert scale (0 – not true, 1 – somewhat/sometimes true, or 2 – very/often true), and the scores are summed to yield seven syndrome scales. These syndrome scale raw scores are further combined to compute two broadband scales: internalizing scores (derived from anxious/depressed behaviors, emotionally reactive behaviors, somatic complaints, and withdrawn behaviors) and externalizing scores (derived from aggressive behaviors and attention problems). The broadband scale raw scores are normalized by sex and age to generate T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation [SD] = 10). Higher T-scores indicate more emotional and behavioral problems in children. The internalizing and externalizing T-scores were used in the analyses.

The timing and frequency of CBCL 1½–5 assessments varied by cohort. Among the 2617 mother–child dyads, 1040 children from eight cohorts were administered the CBCL/1½–5 multiple times between ages 1.5–5 years: 739 children had two measurements, 292 had three, and 9 had four. All repeated CBCL/1½–5 measurements were included in the analyses, as the intraclass correlation coefficients (~0.6) indicated moderate reproducibility.

2.4. Covariates

We a priori constructed a directed acyclic graph to identify confounders, precision variables for outcomes, and potential mediators in the pathway from prenatal exposure to phthalates and alternative plasticizers to child emotional and behavioral outcomes (Textor et al., 2016) (Supplementary Fig. S2). The final covariate set included cohort, maternal race/ethnicity (Hispanic, multiple/other races, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White) as a proxy for structural racism and discrimination, maternal education (high school or less, some college or no/associate’s degree, bachelor’s degree, graduate or professional degree) as a measure of maternal socioeconomic status (SES), maternal marital status (married or living with a partner, single or not living with a partner), maternal age at specimen collection (in years), maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2), maternal tobacco use during pregnancy (no, yes), parity (0, 1, ≥2), breastfed ever (no, yes), child sex (female, male), year of birth (in years), and age at CBCL assessment (in years). We excluded two potential mediators (gestational age at birth and pregnancy complications, i.e., gestational diabetes, hypertension, or preeclampsia) from the covariate set.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Prior to the statistical analysis, metabolite concentrations below the LOD were imputed as the LOD divided by the square root of two. To account for urinary dilution, all metabolite concentrations were adjusted for specific gravity (SG) using the following equation (Kuiper et al., 2021): Csg = C × (SGmedian – 1)/(SG – 1), where Csg is the SG-adjusted concentration, C is the measured concentration, SGmedian is the median SG value for each cohort, and SG is the measured SG value. We summarized the distributions of SG-adjusted metabolite concentrations of phthalates and alternative plasticizers and calculated Spearman correlation coefficients among the metabolites detected > 50% of the samples.

As several metabolites originate from common parent compounds and are therefore highly correlated, we computed molar sums (nmol/mL) for DEHP, di-(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP), and DiNP metabolites using the metabolites detected in over 70% of the samples. The molar sum for DINCH metabolites was also computed because at least one metabolite was detected in over 70% of the samples. The equations used to calculate the molar sums are provided in Supplementary Table S3. The SG-adjusted molar sums and phthalate metabolites detected in more than 70% of the samples were modeled as continuous variables. They were log2 transformed to reduce the influence of outliers and scaled by the interquartile range (IQR) to improve interpretability across metabolites. For metabolites detected in 50% to 70% of the samples, we modeled them as three-level categorical variables: Group 1 (non-detectable levels; reference), Group 2 (lower detectable levels; below the median of detectable values), and Group 3 (higher detectable levels; above the median of detectable values). Metabolites detected in less than 50% of the samples were excluded from the analyses.

To examine associations between individual metabolites and internalizing and externalizing T-scores, we used linear mixed-effects models with a random effect for child, accounting for the repeated CBCL/1½–5 measurements within each child. Given that missing data for all covariates were below 20%, we imputed missing observations using multiple imputation by chained equations including all exposures, outcomes, and covariates. We imputed 100 datasets and combined effect estimates using Rubin’s rules (Rubin, 1987). To assess the robustness of the findings, we performed leave-one-cohort-out analyses by excluding each cohort one at a time to evaluate that cohort’s influence on the overall results.

To investigate associations between a metabolite mixture and internalizing and externalizing T-scores, we employed quantile-based g-computation. This approach estimates the joint effect of simultaneously increasing all exposures in the mixture and does not assume directional homogeneity, allowing metabolites to have positive or negative weights (Keil et al., 2020). For the quantile–based g–computation models, we divided each metabolite into four ordered categories. If a metabolite was detected in ≥75% of samples, its concentrations were categorized into quartiles. if detection was below 75%, values below the LOD were assigned to the lowest category, and the remaining values at or above the LOD were split into three equal-sized groups. The overall effect, represented by psi (ψ), was pooled across imputed datasets, and median weights were calculated to reflect the relative contribution of each exposure to the mixture effect.

To evaluate which syndrome scales might be driving the broadband scale associations, we ran secondary analyses limited to exposure–outcome pairs that showed meaningful associations for internalizing and externalizing T-scores. Given the truncation and pronounced skewness of the syndrome scale T–scores, we instead analyzed the raw syndrome scale scores, treating them as count data. We fitted covariate-adjusted zero inflated negative binomial models and presented the results as count ratios (CRs) by exponentiating the estimates.

Considering the sex-specific effects of phthalates as endocrine disruptors (Jankowska et al., 2021), we tested whether child sex modified the associations between individual phthalate metabolites and internalizing and externalizing T-scores. We performed sex-stratified analyses and assessed the interaction between sex and each metabolite added to the model. As sex-dependent confounding was observed, we fitted an augmented product term model, which included not only the interaction term between sex and each metabolite but also interaction terms between sex and all covariates (Buckley et al., 2017).

As an exploratory analysis, we also evaluated effect modification by the COI at birth, an index of overall neighborhood factors, given that neighborhood conditions may influence the harmful effects of environmental exposures (Barrett and Padula, 2019; Payne-Sturges et al., 2023). We geospatially linked the maternal residential address at birth to the census tract-level COI, calculated by averaging scores across three domains: education, health and environment, and social and economic (Acevedo-Garcia et al., 2020). The nationally normed z-score ranged from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater neighborhood opportunity, and was subsequently categorized into tertiles (low, medium, and high). For the effect modification analysis, we stratified the analyses between individual phthalate metabolites and internalizing and externalizing T–scores by each COI tertile and assessed the interaction between COI and each metabolite by additionally including the interaction term in the model.

A cut-off for statistical significance was a p-value of less than 0.05 for the main and stratified analyses, and less than 0.1 was used to indicate statistically significant effect modification using p-values from the interaction term model. We did not apply multiple comparisons adjustments, as avoiding such adjustments can reduce errors in interpretation by focusing on actual observations of nature (Rothman, 1990). All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic characteristics and CBCL/1½–5 internalizing and externalizing T-scores

Pregnant women participating in this study were 45% non-Hispanic White, 24% non-Hispanic Black, 21% Hispanic, and 11% multiple or other races (Table 1). A majority of the mothers held a bachelor’s degree or higher (51%), were married or cohabitating (76%), and had at least one previous pregnancy (55%). Most did not experience pregnancy complications (87%) and abstained from tobacco use during pregnancy (93%). The median (25th, 75th percentiles) maternal age at prenatal urine collection was 31 (26, 34) years. Children in the study were 51% male, and 54% were born in or after 2016, with a median (25th, 75th percentiles) gestational age at birth of 39 (38, 40) weeks Most mothers initiated breastfeeding (88%). Prenatal maternal urine samples were collected between 2007 and 2021. The largest cohort, Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood (CANDLE), collected samples in the earlier years (2007–2011), while the second- to fifth-largest cohorts collected samples in the later years (2014–2021) (Supplementary Table S4). The mean (SD) CBCL/1½–5 T-scores across all observations (n = 3967) were 44 (11) for internalizing behaviors and 45 (10) for externalizing behaviors, with no substantial variation across cohorts. The sociodemographic characteristics of the included mother–child dyads in this study were generally similar to those of the excluded dyads (n = 11,809), except that there were higher proportions of non-Hispanic White and Black pregnant women, lower proportions of Hispanic women, and those with higher education levels among the included group (Supplementary Table S5).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics and CBCL/1½–5 T-scores among 2617 ECHO mother-child dyads.

Characteristics Frequency (%)a

Maternal race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 1170 (45%)
 Non-Hispanic Black 621 (24%)
 Hispanic 553 (21%)
 Multiple/other racesb <280 (11%)
 Missing <5
Maternal education
 Less than high school, high school degree, GED or equivalent 783 (31%)
 Some college, no/associate’s degree, trade school 462 (18%)
 Bachelor’s degree 640 (25%)
 Masters, professional, or doctorate degree 677 (26%)
Missing 55
Maternal marital status
 Married or living with a partner 1935 (76%)
 Single or not living with a partner c 618 (24%)
 Missing 64
Parity
 0 1132 (45%)
 1 766 (30%)
 ≥2 617 (25%)
 Missing 102
Pregnancy conditions (diabetes, hypertension, or preeclampsia)
 No pregnancy conditions 2260 (87%)
 Reported one of the pregnancy conditions 345 (13%)
 Missing 12
Maternal tobacco use during pregnancy
 No 2273 (93%)
 Yes 163 (7%)
 Missing 181
Child sex
 Female 1273 (49%)
 Male 1344 (51%)
Year of birth
 2007 37 (1%)
 2008 107 (4%)
 2009 172 (7%)
 2010 188 (7%)
 2011 195 (8%)
 2012 70 (3%)
 2013 104 (4%)
 2014 163 (6%)
 2015 164 (6%)
 2016 191 (7%)
 2017 215 (8%)
 2018 344 (13%)
 2019 541 (21%)
 2020 <120 (<5%)
 2021 <10 (<1%)
Child Opportunity Index tertile
 Low 770 (33%)
 Medium 767 (33%)
 High 792 (34%)
 Missing 288
Ever breastfed
 No 270 (12%)
 Yes 1993 (88%)
 Missing 354
Sample collection trimester
 First 192 (7%)
 Second 1599 (61%)
 Third 826 (32%)

Characteristic Mean (SD)

Pre-pregnancy BMI (in kg/m2; missing = 131) 27 (7)
Maternal age at specimen collection (in years) 30 (6)
Gestational age at birth (in weeks) 39 (2)
CBCL/1½–5 T-scores (all observations; n = 3967)
 Internalizing 44 (11)
 Externalizing 45 (10)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CBCL/1½–5, Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1½–5; GED, general educational development; SD, standard deviation.

a

Percentage was calculated without missing observations.

b

Other races include Asian, native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders, American Indian or Alaska native, and multiple races.

c

This category includes single, widowed, separated, divorced, never married, partnered, and not living together.

3.2. Phthalate/alternative plasticizer metabolite concentrations in prenatal maternal urine samples

Fourteen individual phthalate metabolites and a composite analyte of two metabolites were detected in greater than 70% of the samples: five DEHP metabolites, two DPHP metabolites, two DiNP metabolites, monoethyl phthalate (MEP), a composite of MnBP and MiBP (MnBP/MiBP), mono-carboxy isononyl phthalate (MCiNP), mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP), mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP), and mono(7-carboxyheptyl) phthalate (MCHPP) (Table 2). Three metabolites of an alternative plasticizer DINCH were detected in 47% to 67% of the samples. The highest median SG-adjusted urinary concentrations were observed for MEP (37.4 ng/mL), MnBP/MiBP (21.9 ng/mL), mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP) (7.8 ng/mL), mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP) (7.2 ng/mL), MBzP (6.3 ng/mL), mono-carboxy isooctyl phthalate (MCiOP) (5.0 ng/mL), and mono (2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP) (4.1 ng/mL), all of which were detected in over 95% of the samples. Compared with other cohorts, three cohorts (CANDLE, Early Autism Risk Longitudinal Investigation, and Markers of Autism Risk in Babies – Learning Early Signs), which collected samples in earlier years, had higher median concentrations for DEHP metabolites, DiNP metabolites, MBzP, and MCHPP (Supplementary Table S6).

Table 2.

Specific gravity-adjusted urinary concentrations of phthalate and alternative plasticizer metabolites among 2617 ECHO pregnant participants.

Parent compound Metabolites a LOD (ng/mL) % >LOD Percentile (ng/mL)
25th 50th 75th

Phthalates
Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) Mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyxhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP) 0.07 >99% 4.19 7.75 15.8
Mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP) 0.35 99% 3.89 7.23 14.8
Mono (2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP) 0.05 >99% 2.21 4.05 8.05
Mono-2-(carboxymethyl) hexyl phthalate (MCMHP) 0.18 82% 0.51 1.36 3.32
Mono 2-ethyl hexyl phthalate (MEHP) 0.09 72% <LOD 1.16 3.57
∑DEHP b 12.8 23.3 48.3
Di-(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP) Mono-2-(propyl-6-carboxy-hexyl)-phthalate (MPCHP) 0.05 99% 0.32 0.58 1.13
Mono-2-(propyl-6-oxoheptyl)-phthalate (MPOHP) 0.04 84% 0.11 0.27 0.65
Mono-2-(propyl-6-hydroxy-heptyl)-phthalate (MPHHP) 0.06 31% <LOD <LOD 0.16
∑DPHP b 0.58 1.03 1.95
Di-iso-nonyl phthalate (DiNP) Mono-carboxy isooctyl phthalate (MCiOP) 0.05 98% 2.32 5.00 13.4
Monohydroxy-iso-nonyl phthalate (MHiNP) 0.12 74% <LOD 0.36 1.13
∑DiNP b 2.52 5.33 14.0
Diethyl phthalate (DEP) Monoethyl phthalate (MEP) 0.08 >99% 16.3 37.4 109
Dibutyl phthalate (DBP), di-iso-butyl phthalate (DIBP) Composite of mono-n-butyl phthalate and mono-isobutyl phthalate (MnBP/MiBP) 0.15 99% 12.1 21.9 39.6
Di-iso-decyl phthalate (DIDP) Mono-carboxy isononyl phthalate (MCiNP) 0.06 98% 0.43 0.87 1.78
Butylbenzyl phthalate (BBzP) Mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP) 0.08 96% 2.32 6.33 16.7
Di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP) Mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP) c 0.06 89% 0.45 0.88 1.74
Di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP) Mono(7-carboxyheptyl) phthalate (MCHPP) c 0.23 84% 0.53 1.38 4.15
Dimethyl phthalate (DMP) Mono-methyl phthalate (MMP) 0.32 63% <LOD 1.42 3.26
Diheptyl phthalate (DHPP) Mono-2-heptyl phthalate (MHPP) 0.05 62% <LOD 0.13 0.41
Di-n-hexyl phthalate (DnHP) Mono-hexyl phthalate (MHxP) 0.04 56% <LOD 0.07 0.17
Di-iso-propyl phthalate (DiPP) Mono-isopropyl phthalate (MiPP) 0.10 27% <LOD <LOD 0.17
Alternative plasticizer
Di-iso-nonyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono hydroxyisononyl ester (MHNCH) 0.04 67% <LOD 0.12 0.37
(DINCH) Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono(oxo-isononyl) ester (MONCH) 0.05 61% <LOD 0.09 0.21
Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono carboxyisooctyl ester (MCOCH) 0.06 47% <LOD <LOD 0.18
∑DINCH b 0.16 0.31 0.74

Abbreviations: LOD, limit of detection.

a

Phthalate metabolites detected in less than 25% of samples were excluded from the table: monohydroxy-iso-decyl phthalate (MHiDP, LOD = 0.16); mono-isodecyl phthalate (MiDP, LOD = 0.06); mono-propyl phthalate (MPrP, LOD = 0.01); mono-n-octyl phthalate (MOP, LOD = 0.07); mono-pentyl phthalate (MPeP, LOD = 0.04); mono-ethyl terephthalate (METP, LOD = 0.08); mono-tert-butyl terephthalate (MTBTP, LOD = 0.08); mono-benzyl terephthalate (MBzTP, LOD = 0.09); phthalic acid (PA, LOD = 5.00).

b

The molar sums were calculated by dividing the concentration of each analyte by its molecular weight, summing them, and then multiplying the molar sum by the molecular weight of a primary analyte (i.e., MECPP, MPOHP, MHiNP, and MONCH) to express the molar sum on the same units as other analytes.

c

MCPP and MCHPP are primarily metabolites of DNOP but can also be metabolites of other high molecular weight phthalates.

Most SG-adjusted urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations exhibited weak to moderate positive correlations with each other (Spearman correlation coefficients [rsp] = 0.16 to 0.69), except for mono-2-(propyl-6-oxoheptyl)-phthalate (MPOHP) and mono-methyl phthalate (MMP), which showed little correlations (rsp = −0.15 to 0.15) (Supplementary Fig. S3). Stronger correlations were observed among the four DEHP metabolites (MEHHP, MECPP, MEOHP, and MEHP) (rsp = 0.63 to 0.97), between mono-2-(propyl-6-carboxy-hexyl)-phthalate and MCiNP (rsp = 0.88), and between MCHPP and monohydroxy-iso-nonyl phthalate (rsp = 0.83). The three DINCH metabolites were moderately correlated with each other (rsp = 0.64 to 0.73) but showed weak or little correlations (both positive and negative) with most phthalate metabolites (rsp = −0.31 to 0.28).

3.3. Associations between phthalate and alternative plasticizer metabolites and CBCL/1½–5 internalizing and externalizing scores

An IQR increase in MBzP concentrations was associated with a 0.53-point (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05, 1.00) increase in externalizing T-scores (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S7). For mono-hexyl phthalate (MHxP), being in Group 3, compared with Group 1, was associated with a 1.23-point (95% CI: 0.35, 2.12) increase in externalizing T-scores, while Group 2 showed a marginal increase relative to Group 1 (βext = 0.77, 95% CI: −0.04, 1.58). Additionally, an IQR increase in ∑DEHP (βext = 0.50, 95% CI: −0.01, 1.01) and membership in Group 3 for mono-2-heptyl phthalate (MHPP) (versus Group 1; βext = 0.94, 95% CI: −0.01, 1.88), were marginally associated with higher externalizing T-scores. Conversely, an IQR increase in ∑DiNP and MCHPP was associated with lower internalizing T-scores, respectively (βint = −0.45, 95% CI: −0.91, 0.02 for ∑DiNP; βint = −0.76, 95% CI: −1.22, −0.30 for MCHPP). Other phthalate metabolites, as well as the molar sum of an alternative plasticizer DINCH, were not associated with behavioral scores. A metabolite mixture of phthalates and the alternative plasticizer DINCH was associated with lower internalizing T-scores (ψ = −0.70, 95% CI: −1.44, 0.05), largely driven by MCHPP, but not with externalizing T-scores (ψ = 0.29, 95% CI: −0.43, 1.00) (Supplementary Table S8).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Associations of prenatal maternal urinary metabolite concentrations of phthalates and the alternative plasticizer DINCH with CBCL/1½–5 internalizing and externalizing T-scores among 2617 ECHO mother-child dyads. Point estimates indicate beta coefficients, and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Numeric data on beta coefficients and 95% confidence intervals are provided in Supplementary Table S7. Continuous exposure variables (i.e., specific gravity-adjusted molar sums and phthalate metabolites detected in > 70% of the samples) were log2-transformed and scaled by interquartile range. For categorical exposure variables (i.e., phthalate metabolites detected in 50–70% of the samples), Groups 1, 2, and 3 represent non-detectable levels, lower detectable levels (below the median of detected values), and higher detectable levels (above the median of detected values), respectively. Adjusted models included cohort, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal education, maternal marital status, maternal age at specimen collection, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, maternal tobacco use during pregnancy, parity, ever breastfed, and child sex, year of birth, and age at CBCL/1½–5 assessment. Abbreviations: CBCL/1½–5, Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1½–5; CI, confidence interval; DEHP, di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; DINCH, di-iso-nonyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid; DiNP, di-iso-nonyl phthalate; DPHP, di-(2-propylheptyl) phthalate; ECHO, Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes; IQR, interquartile range; MBzP, mono-benzyl phthalate; MCHPP, mono(7-carboxyheptyl) phthalate; MCiNP, mono-carboxy isononyl phthalate; MCPP, mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate; MEP, monoethyl phthalate; MHPP, mono-2-heptyl phthalate; MHxP, mono-hexyl phthalate; MMP, mono-methyl phthalate; MnBP/MiBP, composite of mono-n-butyl phthalate and mono-isobutyl phthalate.

From the leave-one-cohort-out analyses, the associations of MBzP and MHxP Group 3 with higher externalizing T-scores remained robust (Supplementary Table S9). However, the associations of ∑DEHP and MHPP Group 3 with higher externalizing T-scores substantially moved toward the null when the Illinois Kids Development Study (IKIDS) cohort was excluded. Similarly, the associations of MCHPP and ∑DiNP with lower internalizing T-scores disappeared after excluding the CANDLE cohort.

Secondary analyses of syndrome scale raw scores revealed that the associations of MBzP and MHxP Group 3 with higher externalizing scores might be contributed by both the aggression and attention scales (CR = 1.03 − 1.04 per IQR increase in MBzP; CR = 1.13 − 1.14 for MHxP Group 3) (Supplementary Table S10). For ∑DEHP, MHPP Group 3, and MHxP Group 2, the aggression scale appear to drive the association with externalizing scores (CR = 1.03 per IQR increase in ∑DEHP; CR = 1.10 for MHPP Group 3; CR = 1.13 for MHxP Group 2). The associations of ∑DiNP and MCHPP with lower internalizing scores were likely driven by the anxiety/depression scale (CR = 0.97 per IQR increase in both) and, for MCHPP, additionally by the somatic complaints scale (CR = 0.98).

3.4. Effect modification analyses

Associations between MMP Group 2 and MHxP Groups 2 and 3 with externalizing T-scores were modified by child sex (interaction p < 0.09) (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S7). Among female children, these metabolites were associated with higher externalizing T-scores (βext = 0.64, 95% CI: −0.41, 1.69 for MMP Group 2; βext = 1.74, 95% CI: 0.60, 2.88 for MHxP Group 2; βext = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.26, 3.71 for MHxP Group 3), while male children showed null associations (βext = −0.68, 95% CI: −1.79, 0.43 for MMP Group 2; βext = −0.09, 95% CI: −1.25, 1.07 for MHxP Group 2; βext = 0.17, 95% CI: −1.11, 1.46 for MHxP Group 3). In contrast, males showed a positive association between MnBP/MiBP and externalizing T-scores (βext per IQR increase = 0.54, 95% CI: −0.08, 1.16), while females showed a null association (βext = −0.16, 95% CI: −0.71, 0.39) (interaction p < 0.10). Additionally, the associations of ∑DEHP, MBzP, and MHPP Group 3 with higher externalizing T-scores were statistically significant only among male children (βext = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.11, 1.59 for ∑DEHP; βext = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.14, 1.52 for MBzP; βext = 1.82, 95% CI: 0.44, 3.20 for MHPP Group 3), although no effect modification by sex was observed (interaction p > 0.12). We observed no sex-dimorphic associations between metabolites and internalizing T-scores.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Associations of prenatal maternal urinary metabolite concentrations of phthalates and the alternative plasticizer DINCH with CBCL/1½–5 internalizing and externalizing T-scores, stratified by child sex. Point estimates indicate beta coefficients, error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals, and shaded areas indicate a p-value for interaction term between child sex and phthalate metabolites < 0.1. Numeric data on beta coefficients and 95% confidence intervals as well as p-values for interaction terms are presented in Supplementary Table S7. Continuous exposure variables (i.e., specific gravity-adjusted molar sums and phthalate metabolites detected in > 70% of the samples) were log2-transformed and scaled by interquartile range. For categorical exposure variables (i.e., phthalate metabolites detected in 50–70% of the samples), Groups 1, 2, and 3 represent non-detectable levels, lower detectable levels (below the median of detected values), and higher detectable levels (above the median of detected values), respectively. Adjusted models included cohort, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal education, maternal marital status, maternal age at specimen collection, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, maternal tobacco use during pregnancy, parity, ever breastfed, and child year of birth and age at CBCL/1½–5 assessment. CBCL/1½–5, Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1½–5; CI, confidence interval; DEHP, di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; DINCH, di-iso-nonyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid; DiNP, di-iso-nonyl phthalate; DPHP, di-(2-propylheptyl) phthalate; mono-benzyl phthalate; IQR, interquartile range; MCHPP, mono(7-carboxyheptyl) phthalate; MCiNP, mono-carboxy isononyl phthalate; MCPP, mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate; MEP, monoethyl phthalate; MHPP, mono-2-heptyl phthalate; MHxP, mono-hexyl phthalate; MMP, mono-methyl phthalate; MnBP/MiBP, composite of mono-n-butyl phthalate and mono-isobutyl phthalate.

The COI modified associations between several phthalate metabolites and behavioral scores, with effects varying by group (Supplementary Fig. S4 and Table S11). Among children in the high-COI group (more neighborhood opportunity), MHPP Group 3 was associated with higher externalizing T-scores (βext = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.01, 4.29), while children in the low-COI group showed null but inverse associations (βext = −0.44, 95% CI: −2.33, 1.45; interaction p = 0.02). MEP was associated with higher externalizing T-scores among children in the medium-COI group (βext = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.05, 1.91), whereas it was associated with lower T-scores among the low-COI group (βext = −0.44, 95% CI: −1.35, 0.47; interaction p = 0.02). Conversely, inverse associations were observed in the medium-COI group between MMP Group 2 and externalizing T-scores (βext = −0.97, 95% CI: −2.33, 0.40) and between MHPP Group 2 and internalizing T-scores (βint = −1.69, 95% CI: −3.19, −0.19), while null but positive associations were found in the low-COI group (interaction p = 0.03–0.09).

4. Discussion

This large-scale study, conducted in a geographically and sociodemographically diverse U.S. population, provided robust evidence that higher prenatal urinary concentrations of MBzP and MHxP were associated with small to modest increases in externalizing behaviors, reflected in more aggression and attention problems, in children aged 1.5–5 years. DEHP metabolites and MHPP Group 3 (higher detectable levels) were linked to more externalizing behaviors, likely driven by aggression. However, these associations lacked robustness and seemed to be driven by one specific cohort based on the results of the leave-one-cohort-out analyses. Similarly, the associations between DiNP metabolites and MCHPP with fewer internalizing behaviors appeared to be driven by anxiety/depression and, respectively, influenced by a different specific cohort. However, these two specific cohorts influencing the associations did not substantially differ from the overall study sample in these metabolite concentrations, behavioral T-scores, or the child’s age at assessment. Additionally, MCHPP contributed substantially to the marginal inverse association between the metabolite mixture and internalizing behaviors. Child sex modified several associations: males exhibited a positive association between MnBP/MiBP and externalizing behaviors, while females showed a null association. In contrast, adverse associations of MMP Group 2 (lower detectable levels) and MHxP with externalizing behaviors were stronger in females than males. The evidence for effect modification by a measure of neighborhood opportunity was inconsistent. Notably, no associations were found between prenatal exposure to the alternative plasticizer DINCH and child behaviors.

Many prior epidemiological studies have linked gestational exposure to certain phthalates with increased behavioral problems, particularly externalizing behaviors, in young children, often in a sex-specific manner. Consistent with our findings, several studies reported adverse associations between prenatal MBzP and behavioral scores, while MHxP and DiNP metabolites were less studied. For example, the ECHO-PATHWAYS study, which analyzed 1694 mother–child dyads from three U.S. cohorts, reported that MBzP, MHxP, and a phthalate mixture were associated with higher total problem scores assessed by the CBCL/1½–5, while MCiOP (a DiNP metabolite) was linked to lower scores (Barrett et al., 2024). The associations were more pronounced among males, although the statistical significance of the interaction was not evaluated. This study quantified phthalate metabolites in a different laboratory during a separate time period, using different analytical methods, and did not quantify alternative plasticizer metabolites. Additionally, two of the three cohorts in the ECHO-PATHWAYS study (CANDLE and Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth [GAPPS]) were part of our study (31% of our analytic sample). The cohort-specific analyses for the remaining third cohort in the ECHO-PATHWAYS study similarly reported an association between MBzP and externalizing behaviors at ages 4–5 years in males only, although the researchers did not measure MHxP and DiNP metabolites (Day et al., 2021). They observed that a phthalate mixture in late pregnancy, weighted with MBzP and MCPP, was linked to more externalizing behaviors in males but not in females. Additionally, prenatal MBzP concentrations were associated with higher scores for externalizing behaviors and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, particularly among males, in studies of preschool children in Canada and Denmark (Andreasen et al., 2023; England-Mason et al., 2020). Together with our findings in the ECHO Cohort, these studies indicate a consistent pattern linking prenatal exposure to butylbenzyl phthalate (BBzP) to more externalizing behaviors in young children, especially in males.

Limited studies, including ours and the ECHO-PATHWAYS study, have evaluated the association between MHxP and children’s emotional and behavioral outcomes, as MHxP has not been measured in most other research. In several U.S. studies, MHxP was detected in a higher proportion of pregnant or preconception participants (>75%) (Barrett et al., 2024; Nobles et al., 2023) compared to our study (56%), while a study in New York City reported a comparable detection frequency (54%) (Cowell et al., 2023). The parent compound of MHxP, di-n-hexyl phthalate (DnHP), has been restricted by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission for use in children’s toys and childcare articles due to its potential contribution to the cumulative risk from other anti-androgenic phthalates (Lioy et al., 2015). Additionally, DnHP is classified as a reproductive and developmental toxicant under the European Union Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation (Dekant and Bridges, 2016). Studies in rats have shown that DnHP induced thyroid hyperactivity and histological changes, which can adversely affect neurodevelopment (Bereketoglu and Pradhan, 2022; Boas et al., 2006; Howarth et al., 2001). Therefore, further research investigating the neurobehavioral impacts of DnHP is needed to confirm our findings.

Epidemiological evidence for other phthalate metabolites is relatively less consistent. While our study observed prenatal DEHP exposure was associated with higher externalizing behavior scores in males but not in females, it was more strongly linked to higher scores in females than in males in Canadian children aged 2 years (Dewey et al., 2023). DEHP metabolites were associated with higher internalizing behavior scores in 2-year-old males but not in females in Israel (Cohen-Eliraz et al., 2023). Additionally, several studies reported associations for low-molecular-weight phthalates that we did not observe. For instance, MnBP, MiBP, MEP, and MMP were associated with more externalizing behaviors only among males aged 3–4 years in Canada (England-Mason et al., 2020) and among children aged 4–9 years in the U.S., with stronger associations in males (Engel et al., 2010). Prenatal MnBP concentrations were also associated with more internalizing behaviors among French males at age 3 years but not at 5 years (Philippat et al., 2017). These inconsistencies may be attributed to variations in phthalate metabolite concentrations, influenced by geographic regions and differences in sample collection periods and timing, as well as diverse sociodemographic characteristics across cohorts.

Externalizing behaviors found to be adversely associated with phthalate exposure in our study capture a broad range of behavioral problems, and as such, underlying biological processes may be difficult to elucidate. Nevertheless, experimental and epidemiological evidence suggests that in utero phthalate exposure may disrupt the neuroendocrine system (Lucaccioni et al., 2021; Rock and Patisaul, 2018). Phthalate exposure during pregnancy can interfere with thyroid hormone activity (Ghassabian and Trasande, 2018; Kim et al., 2019), which plays a critical role in fetal brain development (Bernal, 2005; Calza et al., 2015). In rodent studies, prenatal DEHP exposure altered neuroendocrine gene expression in the neonatal hypothalamus (Gao et al., 2018); reduced proliferation and neurogenesis in the fetal brain, leading to abnormal neuronal distribution in the newborn brain (Komada et al., 2016); and influenced the lipid metabolome in the fetal brain (Xu et al., 2007). Additionally, phthalates may disrupt the neurotransmitter system by affecting both inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters, which are essential for regulating neurodevelopmental processes (Minatoya and Kishi, 2021; Miodovnik et al., 2014; Rock and Patisaul, 2018). For instance, perinatal DEHP exposure has been shown to affect levels of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid and the excitatory neurotransmitter aspartate in prepubertal rats (Carbone et al., 2012), as well as alter levels of monoamine neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin, in offspring (Kaimal et al., 2024; Yirun et al., 2021).

Prenatal exposure to alternative plasticizers, such as DINCH and DEHTP, is also capable of disrupting the endocrine system (Morales-Grahl et al., 2024; Yu et al., 2023) and have been linked to altered thyroid functions in pregnant women (Cathey et al., 2019; Derakhshan et al., 2021). As epidemiological evidence on the effects on child behavior is limited, we have expanded the literature review to include broader neurodevelopmental outcomes. Consistent with our findings, a previous epidemiological study in France reported that prenatal DINCH exposure was not linked to behavioral scores in 2-year-old children (Guilbert et al., 2021). While DEHTP was not quantified in our study, prenatal exposure to this alternative plasticizer was associated with poorer adaptive and cognitive functions at 6 months of age (Park et al., 2023) and higher overall problem scores at ages 4–6 years (Colicino et al., 2021), especially in males. Given the increasing exposure to these alternative plasticizers (Domínguez-Romero et al., 2023; Jiang et al., 2023; Kasper-Sonnenberg et al., 2019), further large-scale epidemiological studies are warranted to examine their associations with child behaviors, particularly focusing on compounds other than DINCH.

Children in low-opportunity neighborhoods often experience limited access to educational and health resources, reduced social support, and higher stress levels, which may increase their susceptibility to the neurodevelopmental effects of environmental exposures (Acevedo-Garcia et al., 2020; Barrett and Padula, 2019; Dickerson et al., 2023; Payne-Sturges et al., 2023). In our study, we observed both expected positive associations and unexpected inverse associations for several metabolites in low-opportunity neighborhoods. One possible explanation for the mixed findings is that chronic stress and other chemical and non-chemical stressors may mask the impact of phthalates (i.e., the impact of non-chemical stressors may be greater and more salient than the effect of chemical exposures), making the associations appear weaker. For example, the ECHO-PATHWAYS study observed antagonistic interactions between a phthalate mixture and prenatal stressful life events on child behavior (Barrett et al., 2024). Future studies on prenatal phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment should consider the influence of non-chemical stressors, such as neighborhood factors and prenatal maternal stress.

This study is not without limitations. First, we relied on a single spot or first morning urine sample per participant to characterize prenatal exposure to phthalates and alternative plasticizers. Due to the poor to moderate reproducibility of phthalate metabolites (Roggeman et al., 2022), concentrations from a single sample may not accurately reflect exposure levels throughout pregnancy. Second, the CBCL/1½–5 assessment may have been influenced by the language used for assessment, caregiver education level and sex, and child age (Zheng et al., 2024). Additionally, emotional and behavioral problems at a young age, especially internalizing behaviors such as anxiety, depression, and somatic complaints, may be difficult to capture and can change as the child develops (Basten et al., 2016; Kristensen et al., 2010; Shaw et al., 2005). Although we adjusted for the relevant variables and incorporated all repeated CBCL/1½–5 assessments in the analyses, these adjustments may not fully address potential limitations, which could contribute to the weak associations observed for internalizing behaviors. Furthermore, the findings may be specific to young children and may not generalize to other age groups. Future studies should investigate whether the associations we observed between prenatal phthalate exposure and behaviors, as well as the sex differences, persist at older ages. Third, the mother–child dyads in this study were not fully representative of the participating cohorts with respect to several demographic characteristics, such as maternal race/ethnicity and education level, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. Generalizability may also be constrained by exposure differences. Compared with women in comparable NHANES cycles, our pregnant participants showed lower geometric mean of MECPP, MCiOP, MCiNP, and MCPP concentrations but higher MEHHP, MEP, and MBzP concentrations in earlier cycles (2007–2014), with levels converging in later cycles (2015–2018) (Supplementary Table S12). More refined methods that account for cohort–level differences and geographic and temporal trends are needed to compare exposure distributions with other populations.

Despite these limitations, this study has notable strengths. It is the largest study to date to examine a wide range of phthalate and alternative plasticizer metabolites in prenatal urine samples in relation to child behavioral outcomes. A large number of samples collected from 13 ECHO cohorts were analyzed by a single laboratory using established protocols within a short period, minimizing measurement errors. Children’s emotional and behavioral outcomes were repeatedly assessed using a valid and reliable tool to capture fluctuations in outcomes. Furthermore, the study benefitted from a geographically and sociodemographically diverse study population, which included groups with varying phthalate and alternative plasticizer exposure levels during pregnancy and diverse behavioral profiles in children. The ECHO Cohort’s rich data enabled us to not only account for various covariates but also explore neighborhood SES as a potential effect modifier. Although the evidence for effect modification by neighborhood SES was weak and inconsistent across metabolites, its potential influence on the neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal phthalate exposure warrants further investigation.

5. Conclusion

In this large, geographically, and sociodemographically diverse sample, gestational exposure to BBzP and DnHP may be associated with a small-to-modest increase in externalizing behaviors but not internalizing behaviors in young children. Along with findings from the previous ECHO-PATHWAYS study, this is among the first studies to suggest potential adverse effects of DnHP exposure on child behaviors, which warrants further investigation in other populations. There was some evidence of associations of gestational exposure to DEHP and diheptyl phthalate with more externalizing behaviors and of gestational exposure to DiNP and di-n-octyl phthalate with fewer internalizing behaviors. However, these findings were not consistently replicated across cohorts and appeared to be influenced by specific cohorts, suggesting the need for additional research to confirm these relationships. Our data also indicate that prenatal exposure to DINCH, an alternative plasticizer, may not be associated with child behaviors. However, previous toxicological and epidemiological findings suggest that other alternative plasticizers not quantified in this study may be associated with child behaviors. With the increasing use of these novel plasticizers, future studies should explore their neurodevelopmental effects using more recently enrolled cohorts, ideally with repeatedly collected prenatal samples.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109647.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank our ECHO colleagues; the medical, nursing, and program staff; and the children and families participating in the ECHO cohort.

The authors thank Diana Steele Jones of the Duke Clinical Research Institute for editing assistance.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, under Award Numbers U2COD023375 (Coordinating Center), U24OD023382 (Data Analysis Center), U24OD023319 with co-funding from the Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research (Measurement Core), U24OD035523 (Lab Core), ES0266542 (HHEAR), U24ES026539 (HHEAR Barbara O’Brien), U2CES026533 (HHEAR Lisa Peterson), U2CES026542 (HHEAR Patrick Parsons, Kurunthachalam Kannan), U2CES030859 (HHEAR Manish Arora), U2CES030857 (HHEAR Timothy R. Fennell, Susan J. Sumner, Xiuxia Du), U2CES026555 (HHEAR Susan L. Teitelbaum), U2CES026561 (HHEAR Robert O. Wright), U2CES030851 (HHEAR Heather M. Stapleton, P. Lee Ferguson), UG3/UH3OD023251 (Akram Alshawabkeh), UH3OD023320 and UG3OD035546 (Judy Aschner), UH3OD023332 (Clancy Blair, Leonardo Trasande), UG3/UH3OD023253 (Carlos Camargo), UG3/UH3OD023248 and UG3OD035526 (Dana Dabelea), UG3/UH3OD023313 (Daphne Koinis Mitchell), UH3OD023328 (Cristiane Duarte), UH3OD023318 (Anne Dunlop), UG3/UH3OD023279 (Amy Elliott), UG3/UH3OD023289 (Assiamira Ferrara), UG3/UH3OD023282 (James Gern), UH3OD023287 (Carrie Breton), UG3/UH3OD023365 (Irva Hertz-Picciotto), UG3/UH3OD023244 (Alison Hipwell), UG3/UH3OD023275 (Margaret Karagas), UH3OD023271 and UG3OD035528 (Catherine Karr), UH3OD023347 (Barry Lester), UG3/UH3OD023389 (Leslie Leve), UG3/UH3OD023344 (Debra MacKenzie), UH3OD023268 (Scott Weiss), UG3/UH3OD023288 (Cynthia McEvoy), UG3/UH3OD023342 (Kristen Lyall), UG3/UH3OD023349 (Thomas O’Connor), UH3OD023286 and UG3OD035533 (Emily Oken), UG3/UH3OD023348 (Mike O’Shea), UG3/UH3OD023285 (Jean Kerver), UG3/UH3OD023290 (Julie Herbstman), UG3/UH3OD023272 (Susan Schantz), UG3/UH3OD023249 (Joseph Stanford), UG3/UH3OD023305 (Leonardo Trasande), UG3/UH3OD023337 (Rosalind Wright), UG3OD035508 (Sheela Sathyanarayana), UG3OD035509 (Anne Marie Singh), UG3OD035513 and UG3OD035532 (Annemarie Stroustrup), UG3OD035516 and UG3OD035517 (Tina Hartert), UG3OD035518 (Jennifer Straughen), UG3OD035519 (Qi Zhao), UG3OD035521 (Katherine Rivera-Spoljaric), UG3OD035527 (Emily S Barrett), UG3OD035540 (Monique Marie Hedderson), UG3OD035543 (Kelly J Hunt), UG3OD035537 (Sunni L. Mumford), UG3OD035529 (Hong-Ngoc Nguyen), UG3OD035542 (Hudson Santos), UG3OD035550 (Rebecca Schmidt), UG3OD035536 (Jonathan Slaughter), UG3OD035544 (Kristina Whitworth).

Role of funder

The sponsor, NIH, participated in the overall design and implementation of the ECHO Program, which was funded as a cooperative agreement between NIH and grant awardees. The sponsor approved the Steering Committee-developed ECHO protocol and its amendments including COVID-19 measures. The sponsor had no access to the central database, which was housed at the ECHO Data Analysis Center. Data management and site monitoring were performed by the ECHO Data Analysis Center and Coordinating Center. All analyses for scientific publication were performed by the study statistician, independent of the sponsor. The lead author wrote all drafts of the manuscript and made revisions based on co-authors and the ECHO Publications Committee (a committee within the ECHO Cohort) feedback without input from the sponsor. The study sponsor did not review or approve the manuscript for submission to the journal.

Footnotes

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

1

See Supplementary material for full list of collaborators.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Data sharing

Select de-identified data from the ECHO Program are available through NICHD’s Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). Information on study data not available on DASH can be found on the ECHO study DASH webpage.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jiwon Oh: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Conceptualization. Jessie P. Buckley: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation. Sudhi Upadhyaya: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. Kurunthachalam Kannan: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Emily S. Barrett: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Theresa M. Bastain: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Carrie V. Breton: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Stephanie M. Eick: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Sarah Dee Geiger: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Akhgar Ghassabian: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Rima Habre: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Julie B. Herbstman: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Deborah Hirtz: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Donghai Liang: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Kaja LeWinn: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. John D. Meeker: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Thomas G. O’Connor: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Irva Hertz-Picciotto: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Douglas Ruden: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Sheela Sathyanarayana: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Susan L. Schantz: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Julie B. Schweitzer: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Anat Sigal: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Tracey J. Woodruff: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Qi Zhao: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Rebecca J. Schmidt: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Deborah H. Bennett: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Data availability

Select de-identified data from the ECHO Program are available through NICHD’s Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). Information on study data not available on DASH can be found on the ECHO study DASH webpage.

References

  1. Acevedo-Garcia D, Noelke C, McArdle N, Sofer N, Hardy EF, Weiner M, Baek M, Huntington N, Huber R, Reece J, 2020. Racial and ethnic inequities in children’s neighborhoods: evidence from the new child opportunity index 2.0: study uses the child opportunity index 2.0 to examine geographic and racial/ethnic inequities children are exposed to in the one hundred largest metropolitan areas of the United States. Health Aff. 39, 1693–1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida-Toledano L, Navarro-Tapia E, Sebastiani G, Ferrero-Martinez S, Ferrer-Aguilar P, García-Algar Ó, Andreu-Fernandez V, Gómez-Roig MD, 2024. Effect of prenatal phthalate exposure on fetal development and maternal/neonatal health consequences: a systematic review. Sci. Total Environ., 175080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Achenbach TM, 2000. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist 1½–5. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington, VT. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Achenbach+TM%2C+Rescorla+LA.+Manual+for+the+ASEBA+preschool+forms+and+profiles.+Burlington%2C+VT%3A+Universit-y+of+Vermont%2C+Research+center+for+children%2C+youth%2C+%26+families%3B+2000.&btnG=. [Google Scholar]
  4. Andreasen SM, Frederiksen H, Bilenberg N, Andersson A-M, Juul A, Kyhl HB, Jensen TK, 2023. Maternal concentrations of phthalates and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD-) related symptoms in children aged 2 to 4 years from Odense child cohort. Environ. Int. 180, 108244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barrett ES, Day DB, Szpiro A, Peng J, Loftus CT, Ziausyte U, Kannan K, Trasande L, Zhao Q, Nguyen RH, 2024. Prenatal exposures to phthalates and life events stressors in relation to child behavior at age 4–6: a combined cohort analysis. Environ. Int. 183, 108425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrett ES, Padula AM, 2019. Joint impact of synthetic chemical and non-chemical stressors on children’s health. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 6, 225–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Basten M, Tiemeier H, Althoff RR, van de Schoot R, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Hudziak JJ, Verhulst FC, van der Ende J, 2016. The stability of problem behavior across the preschool years: an empirical approach in the general population. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 44, 393–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benjamin S, Masai E, Kamimura N, Takahashi K, Anderson RC, Faisal PA, 2017. Phthalates impact human health: epidemiological evidences and plausible mechanism of action. J. Hazard. Mater. 340, 360–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bereketoglu C, Pradhan A, 2022. Plasticizers: negative impacts on the thyroid hormone system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 38912–38927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernal J, 2005. Thyroid hormones and brain development. Vitamins & Hormones. 71, 95–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boas M, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Skakkebæk NE, Main KM, 2006. Environmental chemicals and thyroid function. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 154, 599–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boberg J, Christiansen S, Axelstad M, Kledal TS, Vinggaard AM, Dalgaard M, Nellemann C, Hass U, 2011. Reproductive and behavioral effects of diisononyl phthalate (DINP) in perinatally exposed rats. Reprod. Toxicol. 31, 200–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Buckley JP, Doherty BT, Keil AP, Engel SM, 2017. Statistical approaches for estimating sex-specific effects in endocrine disruptors research. Environ. Health Perspect. 125, 067013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Calza L, Fernández M, Giardino L, 2015. Role of the thyroid system in myelination and neural connectivity. Compr. Physiol. 5, 1405–1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Campagna AX, Desmarais ED, French B, Underwood JJ, Majdandžić M, Beijers R, de Weerth C, Lee EG, Huitron B, Ahmetoglu E, 2023. Temperament and behaviour problems in children: a multilevel analysis of cross-cultural differences. Infant Child Dev. 32, e2443. [Google Scholar]
  16. Campioli E, Duong TB, Deschamps F, Papadopoulos V, 2015. Cyclohexane-1, 2-dicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester and metabolite effects on rat epididymal stromal vascular fraction differentiation of adipose tissue. Environ. Res. 140, 145–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Campioli E, Lee S, Lau M, Marques L, Papadopoulos V, 2017. Effect of prenatal DINCH plasticizer exposure on rat offspring testicular function and metabolism. Sci. Rep. 7, 11072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carbone S, Ponzo OJ, Gobetto N, Samaniego Y, Reynoso R, Scacchi P, Moguilevsky JA, Cutrera R, 2013. Antiandrogenic effect of perinatal exposure to the endocrine disruptor di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate increases anxiety-like behavior in male rats during sexual maturation. Horm. Behav. 63, 692–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Carbone S, Samaniego YA, Cutrera R, Reynoso R, Cardoso N, Scacchi P, Moguilevsky JA, Ponzo OJ, 2012. Different effects by sex on hypothalamic–pituitary axis of prepubertal offspring rats produced by in utero and lactational exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). Neurotoxicology 33, 78–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cathey AL, Watkins D, Rosario ZY, Vélez C, Alshawabkeh AN, Cordero JF, Meeker JD, 2019. Associations of phthalates and phthalate replacements with CRH and other hormones among pregnant women in Puerto Rico. J. Endocr. Soc. 3, 1127–1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Choi G, Villanger GD, Drover SS, Sakhi AK, Thomsen C, Nethery RC, Zeiner P, Knudsen GP, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Øvergaard KR, 2021. Prenatal phthalate exposures and executive function in preschool children. Environ. Int. 149, 106403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cohen-Eliraz L, Ornoy A, Ein-Mor E, Bar-Nitsan M, Peleg TP, Calderon-Margalit R, 2023. Prenatal exposure to phthalates and emotional/behavioral development in young children. Neurotoxicology 98, 39–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Colicino E, de Water E, Just AC, Navarro E, Pedretti NF, McRae N, Braun JM, Schnaas L, Rodríguez-Carmona Y, Hernández C, 2021. Prenatal urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites and behavioral problems in Mexican children: the programming Research in Obesity, Growth Environment and Social stress (PROGRESS) study. Environ. Res. 201, 111338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cowell W, Jacobson MH, Long SE, Wang Y, Kahn LG, Ghassabian A, Naidu M, Torshizi GD, Afanasyeva Y, Liu M, 2023. Maternal urinary bisphenols and phthalates in relation to estimated fetal weight across mid to late pregnancy. Environ. Int. 174, 107922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Day DB, Collett BR, Barrett ES, Bush NR, Swan SH, Nguyen RH, Szpiro AA, Sathyanarayana S, 2021. Phthalate mixtures in pregnancy, autistic traits, and adverse childhood behavioral outcomes. Environ. Int. 147, 106330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dekant W, Bridges J, 2016. Assessment of reproductive and developmental effects of DINP, DnHP and DCHP using quantitative weight of evidence. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 81, 397–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Derakhshan A, Shu H, Broeren MA, Lindh CH, Peeters RP, Kortenkamp A, Demeneix B, Bornehag C-G, Korevaar TI, 2021. Association of phthalate exposure with thyroid function during pregnancy. Environ. Int. 157, 106795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dewey D, Martin JW, MacDonald AM, Kinniburgh DW, Letourneau N, Giesbrecht GF., Field CJ, Bell RC, England-Mason G, Team AS, 2021. Sex-specific associations between maternal phthalate exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children at 2 years of age in the APrON cohort. NeuroToxicology 157, 106795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dickerson AS, Frndak S, DeSantiago M, Mohan A, Smith GS, 2023. Environmental exposure disparities and neurodevelopmental risk: a review. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 10, 73–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Domínguez-Romero E, Komprdová K, Kalina J, Bessems J, Karakitsios S, Sarigiannis DA, Scheringer M, 2023. Time-trends in human urinary concentrations of phthalates and substitutes DEHT and DINCH in Asian and North American countries (2009–2019). J. Eposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 33, 244–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ejaredar M, Nyanza EC, Ten Eycke K, Dewey D, 2015. Phthalate exposure and childrens neurodevelopment: a systematic review. Environ. Res. 142, 51–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Engel A, Buhrke T, Kasper S, Behr A-C, Braeuning A, Jessel S, Seidel A, Völkel W, Lampen A, 2018. The urinary metabolites of DINCH® have an impact on the activities of the human nuclear receptors ERα, ERβ, AR, Pparα and PPARγ. Toxicol. Lett. 287, 83–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Engel SM, Miodovnik A, Canfield RL, Zhu C, Silva MJ, Calafat AM, Wolff MS, 2010. Prenatal phthalate exposure is associated with childhood behavior and executive functioning. Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 565–571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Engel SM, Patisaul HB, Brody C, Hauser R, Zota AR, Bennet DH, Swanson M, Whyatt RM, 2021. Neurotoxicity of ortho-phthalates: recommendations for critical policy reforms to protect brain development in children. Am. J. Public Health 111, 687–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. England-Mason G, Martin JW, MacDonald A, Kinniburgh D, Giesbrecht GF, Letourneau N, Dewey D, 2020. Similar names, different results: Consistency of the associations between prenatal exposure to phthalates and parent-ratings of behavior problems in preschool children. Environ. Int. 142, 105892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Galvez MP, McGovern K, Teitelbaum SL, Windham G, Wolff MS, 2018. Neighborhood factors and urinary metabolites of nicotine, phthalates, and dichlorobenzene. Pediatrics 141, S87–S95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gao N, Hu R, Huang Y, Dao L, Zhang C, Liu Y, Wu L, Wang X, Yin W, Gore AC, 2018. Specific effects of prenatal DEHP exposure on neuroendocrine gene expression in the developing hypothalamus of male rats. Arch. Toxicol. 92, 501–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gascon M, Valvi D, Forns J, Casas M, Martínez D, Julvez J, Monfort N, Ventura R, Sunyer J, Vrijheid M, 2015. Prenatal exposure to phthalates and neuropsychological development during childhood. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 218, 550–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gerofke A, Lange R, Vogel N, Schmidt P, Weber T, David M, Frederiksen H, Baken K, Govarts E, Gilles L, 2024. Phthalates and substitute plasticizers: Main achievements from the European human biomonitoring initiative HBM4EU. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 259, 114378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ghassabian A, Trasande L, 2018. Disruption in thyroid signaling pathway: a mechanism for the effect of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on child neurodevelopment. Front. Endocrinol. 9, 204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Guilbert A, Rolland M, Pin I, Thomsen C, Sakhi AK, Sabaredzovic A, Slama R, Guichardet K, Philippat C, 2021. Associations between a mixture of phenols and phthalates and child behaviour in a French mother–child cohort with repeated assessment of exposure. Environ. Int. 156, 106697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hauser R, Calafat A, 2005. Phthalates and human health. Occup. Environ. Med. 62, 806–818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Heudorf U, Mersch-Sundermann V, Angerer J, 2007. Phthalates: toxicology and exposure. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 210, 623–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hlisníková H, Petrovičová I, Kolena B, Šidlovská M, Sirotkin A, 2021. Effects and mechanisms of phthalates’ action on neurological processes and neural health: a literature review. Pharmacol. Rep. 73, 386–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Howarth JA, Price SC, Dobrota M, Kentish PA, Hinton RH, 2001. Effects on male rats of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and di-n-hexylphthalate administered alone or in combination. Toxicol. Lett. 121, 35–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jankowska A, Nazareth L, Kaleta D, Polanska K, 2021. Review of the existing evidence for sex-specific relationships between prenatal phthalate exposure and children’s neurodevelopment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 13013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jiang VS, Calafat AM, Williams PL, Chavarro JE, Ford JB, Souter I, Hauser R, Mínguez-Alarcón L, 2023. Temporal trends in urinary concentrations of phenols, phthalate metabolites and phthalate replacements between 2000 and 2017 in Boston, MA. Sci. Total Environ. 898, 165353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kaimal A, Hooversmith JM, Mansi MHA, Holmes PV, MohanKumar PS, MohanKumar SM, 2024. Prenatal exposure to bisphenol a and/or diethylhexyl phthalate impacts brain monoamine levels in rat offspring. J. Xenobiot. 14, 1036–1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kannan K, Stathis A, Mazzella MJ, Andra SS, Barr DB, Hecht SS, Merrill LS, Galusha AL, Parsons PJ, 2021. Quality assurance and harmonization for targeted biomonitoring measurements of environmental organic chemicals across the Children’s Health Exposure Analysis Resource laboratory network. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 234, 113741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kasper-Sonnenberg M, Koch HM, Apel P, Rüther M, Pälmke C, Brüning T, Kolossa-Gehring M, 2019. Time trend of exposure to the phthalate plasticizer substitute DINCH in Germany from 1999 to 2017: Biomonitoring data on young adults from the Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB). Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 222, 1084–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Keil AP, Buckley JP, O’Brien KM, Ferguson KK, Zhao S, White AJ, 2020. A quantile-based g-computation approach to addressing the effects of exposure mixtures. Environ. Health Perspect. 128, 047004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim MJ, Moon S, Oh B-C, Jung D, Choi K, Park YJ, 2019. Association between diethylhexyl phthalate exposure and thyroid function: a meta-analysis. Thyroid 29, 183–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kim S, Eom S, Kim H-J, Lee JJ, Choi G, Choi S, Kim S, Kim SY, Cho G, Kim YD, 2018. Association between maternal exposure to major phthalates, heavy metals, and persistent organic pollutants, and the neurodevelopmental performances of their children at 1 to 2 years of age-CHECK cohort study. Sci. Total Environ. 624, 377–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Knapp EA, Kress AM, Parker CB, Page GP, McArthur K, Gachigi KK, Alshawabkeh AN, Aschner JL, Bastain TM, Breton CV, 2023. The environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO)-wide cohort. Am. J. Epidemiol. 192, 1249–1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Komada M, Gendai Y, Kagawa N, Nagao T, 2016. Prenatal exposure to di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate impairs development of the mouse neocortex. Toxicol. Lett. 259, 69–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kristensen S, Henriksen TB, Bilenberg N, 2010. The Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5–5 (CBCL/1½–5): Assessment and analysis of parent-and caregiver-reported problems in a population-based sample of danish preschool children. Nord. J. Psychiatry 64, 203–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ku H-Y, Tsai T-L, Wang P-L, Su P-H, Sun C-W, Wang C-J, Wang S-L, 2020. Prenatal and childhood phthalate exposure and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder traits in child temperament: a 12-year follow-up birth cohort study. Sci. Total Environ. 699, 134053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kuiper JR, O’Brien KM, Ferguson KK, Buckley JP, 2021. Urinary specific gravity measures in the US population: Implications for the adjustment of non-persistent chemical urinary biomarker data. Environ. Int. 156, 106656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Li N, Papandonatos GD, Calafat AM, Yolton K, Lanphear BP, Chen A, Braun JM, 2020. Gestational and childhood exposure to phthalates and child behavior. Environ. Int. 144, 106036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lioy PJ, Hauser R, Gennings C, Koch HM, Mirkes PE, Schwetz BA, Kortenkamp A, 2015. Assessment of phthalates/phthalate alternatives in children’s toys and childcare articles: Review of the report including conclusions and recommendation of the Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. J. Eposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 25, 343–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lucaccioni L, Trevisani V, Passini E, Righi B, Plessi C, Predieri B, Iughetti L, 2021. Perinatal exposure to phthalates: from endocrine to neurodevelopment effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 4063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lyche JL, Gutleb AC, Bergman Å, Eriksen GS, Murk AJ, Ropstad E, Saunders M, Skaare JU, 2009. Reproductive and developmental toxicity of phthalates. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B 12, 225–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Meeker JD, Sathyanarayana S, Swan SH, 2009. Phthalates and other additives in plastics: human exposure and associated health outcomes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B 364, 2097–2113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Minatoya M, Itoh S, Yamazaki K, Araki A, Miyashita C, Tamura N, Yamamoto J, Onoda Y, Ogasawara K, Matsumura T, 2018. Prenatal exposure to bisphenol a and phthalates and behavioral problems in children at preschool age: the Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children’s Health. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 23, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Minatoya M, Kishi R, 2021. A review of recent studies on bisphenol a and phthalate exposures and child neurodevelopment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 3585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Miodovnik A, Edwards A, Bellinger DC, Hauser R, 2014. Developmental neurotoxicity of ortho-phthalate diesters: review of human and experimental evidence. Neurotoxicology 41, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Morales-Grahl E, Hilz EN, Gore AC, 2024. Regrettable substitutes and the brain: what animal models and human studies tell us about the neurodevelopmental effects of bisphenol, per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and phthalate replacements. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 6887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Morová M, Senko T, Olexová L, Dzirbíková Z, Kršková L, 2020. A mixture of diethylhexyl, diisononyl and dibutyl phthalate decreased anogenital distance, postnatal testosterone levels, and changed social behavior in Wistar rats. Physiol. Res. 69, S489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mustieles V, Rolland M, Pin I, Thomsen C, Sakhi AK, Sabaredzovic A, Muckle G, Guichardet K, Slama R, Philippat C, 2023. Early-life exposure to a mixture of phenols and phthalates in relation to child social behavior: applying an evidence-based prioritization to a cohort with improved exposure assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 131, 087006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Nobles CJ, Mendola P, Kim K, Pollack AZ, Mumford SL, Perkins NJ, Silver RM, Schisterman EF, 2023. Preconception phthalate exposure and women’s reproductive health: pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and underlying mechanisms. Environ. Health Perspect. 131, 127013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Özel F, Stratmann M, Lindh C, Gennings C, Bornehag C-G, Rüegg J, 2023. Prenatal exposure to phthalates and gender-specific play behavior at seven years of age in the SELMA study. Environ. Int. 178, 108029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Palanza P, Paterlini S, Brambilla MM, Ramundo G, Caviola G, Gioiosa L, Parmigiani S, Vom Saal FS, Ponzi D, 2021. Sex-biased impact of endocrine disrupting chemicals on behavioral development and vulnerability to disease: of mice and children. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 121, 29–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Park S, Zimmerman E, Huerta-Montañez G, Rosario-Pabón Z, Vélez-Vega CM, Cordero JF, Alshwabekah A, Meeker JD, Watkins DJ, 2023. Gestational exposure to phthalates and phthalate replacements in relation to neurodevelopmental delays in early childhood. Toxics. 11, 65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Payne-Sturges DC, Taiwo TK, Ellickson K, Mullen H, Tchangalova N, Anderko L, Chen A, Swanson M, 2023. Disparities in toxic chemical exposures and associated neurodevelopmental outcomes: a scoping review and systematic evidence map of the epidemiological literature. Environ. Health Perspect. 131, 096001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Philippat C, Nakiwala D, Calafat AM, Botton J, De Agostini M, Heude B, Slama R, Group EMCS, 2017. Prenatal exposure to nonpersistent endocrine disruptors and behavior in boys at 3 and 5 years. Environ. Health Perspect. 125, 097014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Qadeer A, Anis M, Warner GR, Potts C, Giovanoulis G, Nasr S, Archundia D, Zhang Q, Ajmal Z, Tweedale AC, 2024. Global environmental and toxicological data of emerging plasticizers: current knowledge, regrettable substitution dilemma, green solution and future perspectives. Green Chem. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Rock KD, Patisaul HB, 2018. Environmental mechanisms of neurodevelopmental toxicity. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 5, 145–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Roggeman M, Gys C, Klimowska A, Bastiaensen M, Wielgomas B, Bamai YA, Covaci A, 2022. Reviewing the variability in urinary concentrations of non-persistent organic chemicals: evaluation across classes, sampling strategies and dilution corrections. Environ. Res. 215, 114332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rothman KJ, 1990. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1, 43–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Rubin DB, 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  81. Saad N, Bereketoglu C, Pradhan A, 2021. Di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) alters transcriptional profiles, lipid metabolism and behavior in zebrafish larvae. Heliyon. 7, e07951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Shaw DS, Lacourse E, Nagin DS, 2005. Developmental trajectories of conduct problems and hyperactivity from ages 2 to 10. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 46, 931–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Singer AB, Wolff MS, Silva MJ, Calafat AM, Engel SM, 2017. Prenatal phthalate exposures and child temperament at 12 and 24 months. Neurotoxicology 62, 248–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Textor J, Van der Zander B, Gilthorpe MS, Liśkiewicz M, Ellison GT, 2016. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45, 1887–1894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tsai T-L, Hsieh C-J, Wu M-T, Chen M-L, Kuo P-H, Wang S-L, 2023. Co-exposure to toxic metals and phthalates in pregnant women and their children’s mental health problems aged four years—taiwan Maternal and Infant Cohort Study (TMICS). Environ. Int. 173, 107804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tumu K, Vorst K, Curtzwiler G, 2023. Endocrine modulating chemicals in food packaging: a review of phthalates and bisphenols. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 22, 1337–1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Vogel N, Frederiksen H, Lange R, Jørgensen N, Koch HM, Weber T, Andersson A-M, Kolossa-Gehring M, 2023. Urinary excretion of phthalates and the substitutes DINCH and DEHTP in Danish young men and German young adults between 2000 and 2017–A time trend analysis. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 248, 114080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang Y, Qian H, 2021. Phthalates and their impacts on human health. Healthcare. 9, 603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang Y, Zhu H, Kannan K, 2019. A review of biomonitoring of phthalate exposures. Toxics. 7, 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Xu X, Yang Y, Wang R, Wang Y, Ruan Q, Lu Y, 2015. Perinatal exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate affects anxiety-and depression-like behaviors in mice. Chemosphere 124, 22–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Xu Y, Agrawal S, Cook TJ, Knipp GT, 2007. Di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate affects lipid profiling in fetal rat brain upon maternal exposure. Arch. Toxicol. 81, 57–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Yirun A, Ozkemahli G, Balci A, Erkekoglu P, Zeybek ND, Yersal N, Kocer-Gumusel B, 2021. Neuroendocrine disruption by bisphenol a and/or di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate after prenatal, early postnatal and lactational exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 26961–26974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yu J, Zou H, Zhang T, Zhang J, 2023. Nuclear receptors-mediated endocrine disrupting effects of non-phthalate plasticizers: a review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 71, 16902–16918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zheng S, Mansolf M, McGrath M, Churchill ML, Bekelman TA, Brennan PA, Margolis AE, Nozadi SS, Bastain TM, Elliott AJ, 2024. Measurement bias in caregiver-report of early childhood behavior problems across demographic factors in an ECHO-wide diverse sample. JCPP Adv. 4, e12198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhu H, Chinthakindi S, Kannan K, 2021. A method for the analysis of 121 multi-class environmental chemicals in urine by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1646, 462146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zughaibi TA, Sheikh IA, Beg MA, 2022. Insights into the endocrine disrupting activity of emerging non-phthalate alternate plasticizers against thyroid hormone receptor: a structural perspective. Toxics 10, 263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Data Availability Statement

Select de-identified data from the ECHO Program are available through NICHD’s Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). Information on study data not available on DASH can be found on the ECHO study DASH webpage.

RESOURCES