Abstract
Purpose. Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) remains a major global public health concern due to its high morbidity and mortality rates, particularly among children and the elderly. This study aimed to apply whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to characterize Streptococcus pneumoniae strains responsible for IPD in south Tunisia, including serotype distribution, clonal relationship and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles.
Methods. A total of 148 IPD S. pneumoniae isolates were collected from the microbiology laboratory at Habib Bourguiba University Hospital in Sfax, Tunisia, between 2012 and 2022. These isolates underwent WGS using Illumina technology. Bioinformatic analyses were performed to determine serotype distribution, sequence types (STs), Global Pneumococcal Sequence Clusters (GPSCs), phylogenetic relationships and AMR determinants.
Results. Twenty-six different serotypes were identified, with the most prevalent being 14 (18%), 3 (13%), 19A (12%) and 19F (11%). The isolates showed high genomic diversity, as they belonged to 32 GPSCs and 59 STs. The most common GPSCs were GPSC-6, GPSC-10 and GPSC-44, associated with serotypes 14, 19A and 19F, respectively. The most frequent STs were ST2918, ST179 and ST3772. The most common resistance genes were ermB (53%) and tetM (55%), which were linked to resistance against erythromycin and tetracycline, respectively. There was a considerable concordance between WGS-based and phenotypic resistance profiles for most tested antibiotics, with few major and very major errors for most antibiotics. Temporal analysis showed a decline in serotypes 19F and 9V throughout the study period, which was associated with slight decreases in GPSC-6 and GPSC-44, while serotype 19A and GPSC-10 sharply increased.
Conclusion. This study highlights the substantial genomic diversity, serotype distribution and high prevalence of AMR among IPD S. pneumoniae isolates in south Tunisia, underscoring the need for continued surveillance and effective vaccination strategies to combat this persistent public health threat.
Keywords: genomic surveillance, global pneumococcal sequence cluster, invasive pneumococcal disease, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Tunisia, whole-genome sequencing
Impact Statement
Streptococcus pneumoniae remains a significant public health threat due to its ability to cause invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), such as meningitis and sepsis, which result in considerable morbidity and mortality. The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in S. pneumoniae further complicates treatment strategies, highlighting the critical need for continuous monitoring of its genomic diversity, serotype distribution and resistance patterns. This study presents the first genomic analysis of IPD S. pneumoniae strains in Tunisia, revealing high genetic diversity and widespread prevalence of AMR. Over the past decade, notable changes were observed in the genetic make-up and serotype distribution of S. pneumoniae, including a decline in lineages associated with vaccine-targeted serotypes. However, the emergence of the GPSC-10 lineage, characterized by high AMR, underscores the urgent need for enhanced surveillance and the implementation of more effective vaccination strategies to limit the spread of resistant S. pneumoniae and address the growing challenge of AMR in the region.
Data Summary
The sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI BioProject database under accession number PRJNA1182109. The associated Sequence Read Archive, BioSample and Genbank accession numbers are provided in Table S1. Additionally, all genome assemblies generated in this study are available via Zenodo at DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15543227. Five tables and four figures are provided as supplementary materials. All supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files.
Introduction
Streptococcus pneumoniae is an opportunistic pathogen that poses significant challenges to public health. It is responsible for a broad spectrum of diseases ranging from mild respiratory infections to severe and life-threatening conditions known as invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPD), including meningitis and bacteraemia [1,2]. These infections predominantly affect vulnerable populations, including young children, the elderly and individuals with compromised immune systems [3,6]. Among these groups, the impact of IPD can be particularly severe, often resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates [7].
The primary virulence factor of S. pneumoniae is its polysaccharide capsule, which is implicated in disease severity [8,9]. The pneumococcal capsule is characterized by high diversity, with over 100 different serotypes being identified [10]. Such diversity is crucial in enabling S. pneumoniae to persist in human populations and evade immune response. This complicates prevention efforts and poses challenges for vaccine development and public health strategies.
In the last decades, the treatment of pneumococcal infections has become increasingly challenging due to the growing problem of antibiotic resistance [11,14]. This rise in resistance has led to S. pneumoniae being recognized by the World Health Organization as a priority pathogen [15]. The widespread use of antimicrobial drugs has likely contributed to this issue by providing a selective advantage to resistant strains [16].
In Tunisia, IPD remains a significant public health issue, contributing to high morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Pneumococcal meningitis alone affects around 26 children under the age of 15 per million, resulting in 69 hospitalizations and 10 deaths annually [17]. To address this, Tunisian health authorities introduced pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) in the private sector since 2008 and included PCV10 (GSK) in the national immunization programme since 2019 [18,19].
The ongoing surveillance of S. pneumoniae is essential to adapt vaccination and therapeutic strategies [20]. In recent years, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has revolutionized the study of S. pneumoniae, providing detailed analysis of its genetic make-up, including serotype distribution, antibiotic resistance determinants and virulence factors. WGS also facilitates the tracking of S. pneumoniae clones and their transmission pathways, which is essential for understanding the epidemiology of IPD and developing effective public health strategies [21].
In this study, we conducted a comprehensive genomic investigation of S. pneumoniae strains responsible for IPD in south Tunisia between 2012 and 2022, focusing on serotype distribution, genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance determinants among the isolates.
Methods
Sample collection and serotyping
Between January 2012 and December 2022, a total of 201 non-duplicate S. pneumoniae isolates responsible for IPD were collected at the microbiology laboratory of Habib Bourguiba University Hospital in Sfax, Tunisia. Among these, 148 non-duplicate S. pneumoniae isolates were subjected to WGS. These isolates were collected from both paediatric (n=68) and adult patients (n=75) in south Tunisia, with age unknown for five patients. They were recovered from clinical specimens taken from sterile body sites, including blood (n=73), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (n=48) and other body fluids (n=27).
The study duration was subdivided into three distinct periods: period 1 (2012–2015), period 2 (2016–2019) and period 3 (2020–2022), the latter being shortly after the introduction of PCV10 (GSK) into the national immunization programme.
The identification of the isolates was confirmed using standard procedures, including Gram staining, optochin sensitivity and bile solubility tests. PCR targeting the autolysin (lytA), pneumolysin (ply) and capsular (cpsA) genes was conducted to validate the identification, as previously described [22,23]. Serotyping was performed using a combination of multiplex PCR [24] and latex agglutination (ImmuLex™ Pneumotest).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
All isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility for penicillin G, amoxicillin, cefotaxime and levofloxacin by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using E-tests and for erythromycin (15 µg), gentamicin (500 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25–23.75 µg) and rifampicin (5 µg) using the disc diffusion technique. The two methods were performed on Mueller–Hinton agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood and interpreted according to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society of Microbiology (CA-SFM) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Results were categorically classified as ‘susceptible, standard dosing regimen’ (S), ‘susceptible, increased exposure’ (I) or ‘resistant’ (R). Both meningitis and non-meningitis breakpoints were applied for beta-lactams (Table S2, available in the online Supplementary Material). Multi-drug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to at least three classes of antibiotics. S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as a quality control strain.
WGS and bioinformatic analysis
WGS, assembly and quality control
Genomic DNA was extracted from pneumococcal isolates through the QIAamp DNeasy blood and tissue method. Library preparation was performed using the NEBNEXT® Ultra™ II DNA Preparation Kit. WGS was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq platform using 2×150 bp paired-end chemistry. Quality control and trimming of reads were performed with fastp software (v.0.23.4) [25]. The genome data were assembled with the Shovill (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill) wrapper (v.1.1.0). Assemblies were evaluated with the QUAST (v.5.0.2) tool to assess their quality [26].
In silico typing
Bioinformatic analysis was mostly performed following the Nextflow pipeline [27] developed by the Global Pneumococcal Sequencing (GPS) group (available at https://github.com/sanger-bentley-group/gps-pipeline). In silico serotyping was performed using seroBA (v.1.0.5) [28]. Sequence types (STs) of the S. pneumoniae isolates were determined by the sequences of seven housekeeping genes (aroE, gdh, gki, recP, spi, xpt and ddl) obtained from the results of WGS. Allelic numbers and STs were assigned using the mlst tool (v.2.23.0) (https://github.com/tseemann/mlst) and the PubMLST database (https://pubmlst.org/) for S. pneumoniae. Strains for which at least six of the seven alleles were identical were classified as belonging to a clonal complex (CC) using goeBURST (v.1.2.1) [29].
The genetic structure was further elucidated by assigning each isolate to a Global Pneumococcal Sequence Cluster (GPSC) using the k-mer-based clustering tool PopPUNK (v.2.6.0) [30] based on the GPS database (GPSC v6; n=42,163, available at https://www.pneumogen.net/gps/training_command_line.html) [21].
Detection of antimicrobial resistance determinants
Antibiotic resistance genes and mutations were detected from S. pneumoniae genomes using the custom Nextflow pipeline developed by the GPS group, which incorporates the ARIBA (v.2.14.6) tool [31] and the pipeline of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, available at https://github.com/BenJamesMetcalf/Spn_Scripts_Reference. In addition, penicillin-binding protein (PBP) allelic profiles were further checked using the PBPtyper (v.1.0.2) tool (https://github.com/rpetit3/pbptyper). A machine learning (ML) model based on PBP alleles was applied to predict beta-lactam resistance profiles [32]. The concordance between phenotypic and WGS-based predictions was assessed following the Food and Drug Administration recommendations, which define very major errors (predicted as susceptible but phenotypically resistant), major errors (predicted as resistant but phenotypically susceptible) and minor errors (any other discordance) [33].
Phylogenetic analysis
Core-genome SNP alignment was performed using the Snippy tool (v.4.6.0) (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy). Gubbins (v.3.2.1) [34] was employed to identify and remove recombination sites. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using IQ-TREE (v.2.0.3) [35], with the TMV+F+ASC+R2 substitution model, which was selected based on the Bayesian information criterion through ModelFinder [36]. Data were visualized with midpoint rooting using the Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) tool [37].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using the R language (v.4.4.0) through the R graphical user interface (R GUI). The Cochran–Armitage test for trend was employed via the DescTools library to analyse temporal changes in serotype distributions, pneumococcal lineages and resistance rates. A P-value threshold of 0.05 was set to determine statistical significance.
Results
Serotype distribution
The 148 invasive S. pneumoniae isolates were classified into 26 different serotypes using WGS and 25 serotypes using conventional techniques (PCR/latex agglutination). The WGS-based in silico serotyping method showed a high level of concordance with conventional methods, with a 96% (n=142/148 isolates) agreement rate. The remaining five cases showed partial discordance, with both in silico and conventional methods assigning them to the same serogroup (Table S3).
The most predominant serotypes based on WGS were 14 (18%), followed by 3 (13%), 19A (12%), 19F (11%), 6 A/6E(6A) (7%), 9V (6%) and 6E(6B) (5%) (Fig. 1). The theoretical vaccine coverage of the different PCVs was as follows: 51% for PCV7, 53% for PCV10 (GSK), 66% for PCV10 (SII), 84% for PCV13 and PCV15 and 86% for PCV20.
Fig. 1. Distribution of S. pneumoniae serotypes according to their inclusion in PCVs in south Tunisia (2012–2022).
The plot visualizes serotypes as determined by WGS. Molecular type 6E(6A) was considered as a single serotype with 6A but was displayed separately for clarity.
Antibiotic resistance profiles
Phenotypic resistance
Based on non-meningitis breakpoints, penicillin G resistance was observed in 6% of IPD S. pneumoniae isolates, amoxicillin resistance was noted in 12% of strains and none of the IPD isolates were resistant to cefotaxime. However, using meningitis breakpoints, 69% of strains were resistant to penicillin G, 48% to amoxicillin and 11.5% to cefotaxime.
The resistance rate to other antibiotics was observed as follows: erythromycin resistance was found in 63% of strains. Tetracycline resistance was detected in 36% of isolates. Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was noted in 18% of cases. Chloramphenicol resistance was observed in 4% of strains. Levofloxacin resistance was rare, occurring in only two isolates (Fig. 2). All strains were susceptible to rifampicin and no high-level resistance was detected for gentamicin. MDR was observed in 15% of strains based on non-meningitis breakpoints. In contrast, 40% of isolates were classified as MDR when applying meningitis breakpoints, with 80% of MDR isolates exhibiting combined resistance to at least beta-lactams, erythromycin and tetracycline.
Fig. 2. Upset plots of phenotypic resistance profiles based on non-meningitis breakpoints (a) and meningitis breakpoints (b).
WGS-based resistance profiles
The 148 S. pneumoniae strains displayed significant diversity in PBP genes, with 23 previously reported pbp2A alleles, 27 pbp2B alleles and 20 pbp2X alleles. Additionally, 19 strains carried at least 1 newly identified PBP allele. ML predictions of MICs based on these alleles showed high specificity when predicting beta-lactam susceptibility, though the overall agreement was moderate with phenotypic resistance results of beta-lactams (Fig. S1). Most discordances were minor, except for three cases: one major discordance for amoxicillin (predicted as resistant but phenotypically susceptible), one major discordance for cefotaxime and one very major discordance for amoxicillin (predicted as susceptible but phenotypically resistant).
Regarding other antibiotic classes, the most frequently detected resistance genes were tetM, found in 55% of isolates, and ermB, found in 53% of isolates. In the majority of cases, both genes were detected together, except for three isolates that contained only tetM (Fig. 3). Sixteen (11%) strains harboured both mefA and msrD genes, and six (4.5%) strains carried the cat gene. The most common resistance mutations were observed within the folA (27% of strains) and folP (50% of strains) genes, while mutations in the parC gene were rare, with only two strains displaying the S79F and S79Y mutations.
Fig. 3. Upset plots of resistance determinant carriage based on WGS.
The concordance analysis between antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants and phenotypic resistance revealed a perfect agreement for erythromycin and chloramphenicol (Fig. S2). All tetracycline-nonsusceptible (I+R) strains harboured the tetM gene, although it was also found in 24% of tetracycline-susceptible strains (major errors). The S79F and S79Y mutations in parC were exclusively linked to levofloxacin resistance. For trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the concordance was relatively lower. All nonsusceptible strains carried mutations in folA and/or folP, with 88.5% (23 out of 26) of resistant strains having mutations in both genes. However, this combination of mutations (folA and folP) was also detected in 8% of susceptible cases (major errors).
Pneumococcal lineages
Multilocus sequence typing of all S. pneumoniae strains revealed 59 distinct STs, including six novel STs (Table S4). Based on single-locus variations, these STs formed 13 CCs and 24 singletons. The most common STs were ST2918 (11%), ST179 (9.5%) and ST3772 (9.5%). Most STs (92.59%) were linked to a single serotype, while four STs were associated with two serotypes: ST63 (serotypes 14 and 23F), ST1381 (serotypes 18B and 18C), ST280 (serotypes 9V and 18C) and ST156 (serotypes 14 and 9V).
Phylogenetic analysis revealed considerable genetic diversity of the 148 sequenced IPD S. pneumoniae isolates (Figs 4 and S3). PopPUNK clustering assigned these strains into 32 GPSCs. Within this classification, we identified one entirely new GPSC (GPSC-1124). The most common GPSCs were GPSC-6 (22%), GPSC-10 (11.5%), GPSC-44 (10%), GPSC-12 (8%) and GPSC-16 (7%). It is noteworthy that serotypes and STs were found to be correlated with the genome-based GPSCs (Table S5). Particularly, all sequences sharing the same ST were classified into a single GPSC. Furthermore, frequent serotypes (14, 19F, 19A and 6B) were predominantly associated with one GPSC (GPSC-6, GPSC-44, GPSC-10 and GPSC-47, respectively). On the other hand, serotype 3 isolates displayed notable genetic diversity and were assigned to GPSC-12 and GPSC-86 in 63% (n=12/19) and 37% (n=7/19) of cases, respectively. Also, serotype 6A isolates exhibited a high genetic diversity, being classified into GPSC-13 (n=5/10), GPSC-9 (n=3/10) and GPSC-213 (n=1/10), while the 6E(6A) isolate was classified into GPSC-47 (n=1/10).
Fig. 4. Phylogenetic tree of the 148 south Tunisian S. pneumoniae responsible for invasive pneumococcal diseases between 2012 and 2022.
Resistance rates varied considerably across GPSCs. Among the predominant GPSCs, GPSC-12 and GPSC-83, both associated with serotype 3, were largely susceptible to all tested antibiotics (Fig. 5). GPSC-12 strains lacked any resistance determinants, while three of the seven GPSC-83 isolates carried tetM and ermB. The GPSCs with the highest rates of MDR were GPSC-16 (40%), GPSC-6 (31%) and GPSC-47 (25%) when applying non-meningitis breakpoints. Based on meningitis breakpoints, MDR rates were high for GPSC-9 (83%), GPSC-44 (80%), GPSC-10 (76.5%) and GPSC-47 (62.5%). In contrast, the MDR rates for GPSC-16 and GPSC-6 were relatively lower, at around 50% and 37.5%, respectively.
Fig. 5. Distribution of phenotypic resistance and AMR determinants according to pneumococcal lineages.
Dynamics of pneumococcal serotypes and lineages over time
To better understand the dynamics of pneumococcal lineages and serotypes over time, the study period was divided into three distinct phases. As shown in Fig. 6, there was a significant decrease in the prevalence of serotypes 19F (P=0.04) and 9V (P=0.002) from 19% and 16% in period 1 (2012–2015) to 5% and 0% in period 3 (2020–2022), respectively. This was associated with a slight decrease in the prevalence of GPSC-44 and GPSC-6 from 16% and 26% during 2012–2015 to 5% and 17% during 2020–2022, respectively. Conversely, serotype 19A experienced a significant increase (P<0.001), rising from undetectable levels in period 1–27% in period 3. This was associated with a significant increase in detection rates of GPSC-10 (P=0.005) from 2% in 2012–2015 to 22% in 2020–2022. Meanwhile, other dominant serotypes, such as 14, 3 and 6A remained prevalent throughout all study periods.
Fig. 6. Evolution of S. pneumoniae serotype and GPSC distribution from 2012 to 2022 in south Tunisia. Statistical significance is indicated in red, with the following thresholds: P-value between 0.1 and 0.05 (‘.’), P-value between 0.05 and 0.01 (‘*’), P-value between 0.01 and 0.001 (‘**’) and P-value below 0.001 (‘***’).
In addition to shifts in overall prevalence, the serotype composition within certain GPSCs also changed over time (Fig. S4). For instance, the proportion of the non-PCV serotype 9 N increased within GPSC-16 since 2016–2019, partially replacing the PCV serotype 23F. Within GPSC-6, the proportion of PCV serotype 9V declined progressively and became undetected by 2020–2022, while PCV serotype 14 remained relatively stable within the same GPSC.
Dynamics of AMR over time
The temporal analysis of AMR from 2012 to 2022 revealed variations in resistance patterns for beta-lactams and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (Fig. 7a). Based on non-meningitis breakpoints, resistance to penicillin G significantly declined from 14% in 2012–2015 to undetected levels in 2020–2022 (P=0.007), coinciding with a significant reduction in MDR rates from 28% to 10% during the same period (P=0.018). Using meningitis breakpoints, amoxicillin resistance increased slightly from 44% to 51%, while cefotaxime resistance decreased moderately from 19% to 7%. However, MDR rates under these breakpoints remained stable at around 40%. Resistance to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole decreased from 30% in 2012–2015 to 11–15% in 2016–2022 (P=0.057). Nevertheless, nonsusceptibility rates (I+R) for this antibiotic showed minimal change, following more closely the trends of the co-detection of folA and folP genes (Fig. 7b). For other antibiotics, there was no notable change in phenotypic resistance rates or AMR determinant detection rates across the 2012–2022 period.
Fig. 7. Changes in phenotypic AMR (a) and detection rates of AMR determinants (b) in S. pneumoniae in south Tunisia during 2012–2022. Statistical significance is indicated in red, with the following thresholds: P-value between 0.1 and 0.05 (‘.’), P-value between 0.05 and 0.01 (‘*’), P-value between 0.01 and 0.001 (‘**’) and P-value below 0.001 (‘***’).
Discussion
IPD remains a significant public health challenge worldwide. Monitoring the changing patterns of pneumococcal serotypes and their associated genetic characteristics is crucial for guiding effective vaccination and therapeutic strategies. In this study, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the serotype distribution, clonal relationships and antimicrobial resistance determinants of IPD isolates in south Tunisia.
To achieve this, we employed WGS, which offers higher resolution than conventional genotyping methods like pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis. WGS enables comprehensive screening of antimicrobial resistance determinants, surpassing classical PCR techniques, which typically detect a limited number of genes per reaction. Additionally, there are multiple WGS-based tools that can predict pneumococcal serotypes [28,38, 39]. Indeed, our findings demonstrated a high concordance between conventional serotyping and in silico serotyping methods, with agreement rates comparable to those reported in the literature [40,41]. Moreover, WGS enabled the identification of molecular types 6E(6A) and 6E(6B), which are serologically similar to 6A and 6B, respectively, and cannot be distinguished through conventional techniques.
The distribution of serotypes varies depending on geographic region, patient age, infection type and time [42]. In our study, 26 serotypes were identified using WGS, with serotype 14 being the most common, followed by serotype 3. Serotype 14 has historically been dominant in multiple countries prior to the introduction of PCVs [43]. Serotype 3 is frequently observed in IPD but is much less frequent in carriage cases. A recent Tunisian study revealed that serotype 3 carriage is rare among children under 5 years old [19]. However, it is noteworthy that serotype 1, one of the most common serotypes responsible for IPD globally, and particularly prevalent in African countries [44], was not detected in this study. The absence of serotype 1 in our cohort reflects regional differences in serotype distribution.
Regarding antimicrobial resistance, low penicillin G and amoxicillin resistance (R) rates were observed in our cohort based on non-meningitis breakpoints, though this rate was much higher using meningitis breakpoints. This may be attributed to the high diversity of PBP alleles. Nevertheless, most strains remained susceptible to cefotaxime, supporting third-generation cephalosporins as a suitable treatment option for IPD, particularly in meningitis cases.
ML-based beta-lactam resistance prediction, relying on PBP allele combinations [32,45], demonstrated high specificity in predicting susceptibility (S), as most strains predicted to be susceptible were also phenotypically susceptible. However, there was moderate agreement between WGS and phenotypic methods for beta-lactam ‘susceptibility at increased exposure’ (intermediate, I) and for resistance (R), underscoring the need to update ML models by incorporating recently identified PBP alleles. This improvement is particularly relevant for under-sequenced regions like Tunisia, where a considerable proportion of strains harboured new PBP alleles.
For other antibiotics, macrolide resistance was the most prevalent, aligning with existing literature [46]. This resistance is predominantly driven by the ermB gene, which encodes an enzyme that methylates 23S rRNA, leading to target-site modification and resulting in high levels of macrolide resistance. In contrast, the mefA gene, which encodes macrolide efflux pumps and contributes to lower levels of macrolide resistance, was found to be ten times less frequent [47]. The high prevalence of the ermB-mediated resistance mechanism observed in our study is also reported in European countries, whereas efflux pump mechanisms are more common in North America and Asia [47]. Notably, most isolates carrying the ermB gene also harboured the tetracycline resistance gene tetM. Previous reports showed that tetM is commonly associated with mobile elements, such as conjugative transposons, which frequently carry other resistance genes like ermB [48].
Concerning fluoroquinolones, which are commonly used to treat pneumococcal infections alongside beta-lactams and macrolides, resistance is acquired through three main mechanisms: the accumulation of genomic mutations, increased drug efflux and the acquisition of plasmid-encoded resistance genes [49]. In this study, fluoroquinolone resistance rates were low, likely due to more restricted antibiotic usage. The two levofloxacin-resistant cases were linked to mutations in the parC gene. The observed AMR rates are mostly consistent with those reported in a recent national study spanning eight hospital centres and over 4,000 clinical isolates [50].
The overall agreement between phenotypic and WGS-based predictions in this study was high across most antibiotics, which reflects the potential of WGS for predicting antimicrobial nonsusceptibility. Notably, most strains lacking a resistance determinant for any antibiotic were phenotypically susceptible to it, affirming the method’s reliability for identifying susceptible strains. Discordant cases where susceptible phenotypes were associated with AMR determinants may be due to the non-expression or under-expression of these resistance genes.
From a genomic perspective, our study revealed a high level of genetic diversity, as indicated by the large number of identified STs. This finding aligns with observations from studies conducted in various countries, where high ST diversity has been reported [51,54]. Several factors contribute to the genetic make-up of S. pneumoniae, including the emergence of new clones, mutations and selective pressures imposed by vaccination and antibiotic use.
In recent years, the GPSC classification scheme has gained prominence for grouping pneumococcal isolates into different lineages. This classification system facilitates the tracking of specific clones and their potential public health implications. Within our cohort, the most prevalent GPSCs were GPSC-10, GPSC-6 and GPSC-44, which are all classified as major clusters according to the GPSC database. These clusters are associated with various antibiotic resistance determinants and high MDR rates, making their monitoring crucial. In contrast, other GPSCs such as GPSC-12 and GPSC-83 were largely susceptible to most antibiotics. These two GPSCs are associated with serotype 3, which was previously reported to be susceptible to most antibiotics [55,56].
Literature data indicate that the distribution of GPSCs varies significantly across countries. The two most predominant GPSCs in this study (GPSC-10 and GPSC-6) were also common in countries with strong travel connections to Tunisia, such as Morocco and France, as reported in the GPS database [21]. This suggests potential cross-border transmission, emphasizing the need for regional surveillance. However, these GPSCs were less prevalent in several other African countries [52,57]. This variability in GPSC distribution can be explained by several factors including local epidemiology, environmental conditions, antibiotic usage and vaccination strategies such as the valency and coverage of pneumococcal vaccines. These vaccination efforts, particularly with PCVs, are primarily aimed at reducing the incidence of IPD by targeting the serotypes most commonly associated with severe infections.
In Tunisia, pneumococcal lineage and serotype distribution have shifted notably since PCV7 introduction in the private sector during 2008, followed by PCV10 (GSK) and PCV13 in 2012. Despite limited access, these vaccines initially reduced the prevalence of some vaccine serotypes, such as 19F and 9V. Similar shifts in serotype distribution were also reported in another multicentric Tunisian study involving 903 isolates collected from 2012 to 2019, based on conventional serotyping methods [50]. A major shift occurred in 2019 with the implementation of PCV10 (GSK) in the national immunization programme, leading to broader coverage. This vaccination strategy resulted in significant changes such as the replacement of serotypes 19F and 9V by 19A, associated with a sharp rise in the prevalence of GPSC-10. The increase of serotype 19A following low-valency PCVs vaccination that does not include it has been previously reported in other countries, including Australia, France, Finland [43] and Brazil [58]. Despite vaccination efforts, several pneumococcal lineages, such as GPSC-6, GPSC-12 and GPSC-83, remained predominant throughout the study period. GPSC-12 and GPSC-83 are associated with serotype 3, which is not covered by PCV10 (GSK) and is known to resist vaccination efforts by higher valency PCVs. This low response to vaccination is attributed to mechanisms such as the profuse production and shedding of its capsule, which can overwhelm the protective capacity of antibodies [59]. The prevalence of GPSC-6, however, slightly decreased due to the reduction of the vaccine serotype 9V, while vaccine serotype 14 within GPSC-6 was largely unaffected by vaccination. This suggests that GPSC-6 as a whole is not resistant to vaccination and that few genetic factors may contribute to the persistence of GPSC-6 serotype 14. Nevertheless, a slight decreasing trend in the overall prevalence of serotype 14 was observed in a national multi-centric study during 2012–2019 [50], suggesting that vaccination against this serotype is likely still effective. Further investigation is warranted to clarify whether this national decline reflects a reduction of serotype 14 within GPSC-6 or declines across other genetic lineages harbouring this serotype.
This study has some limitations, mainly related to the sampling strategy. The analysis was only based on isolated collections from the microbiology laboratory of Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, which is the main reference laboratory for microbiological diagnostics in the southern part of the country. This laboratory receives specimens from the two largest tertiary hospitals in the region: Hedi Chaker and Habib Bourguiba (~1,600 beds), as well as other secondary healthcare centres. Therefore, our dataset likely provides a reasonably representative overview of pneumococcal serotypes and lineages circulating in south Tunisia. However, the moderate number of IPD isolates sequenced each year limits the capacity to detect minor changes in serotype and lineage distribution.
Overall, this study represents the first comprehensive genomic characterization of S. pneumoniae in Tunisia. Our findings revealed changes in the serotype distribution and the genomic landscape from 2012 to 2022, following vaccination efforts. This led to a decrease in the prevalence of several GPSCs associated with vaccine serotypes. Nevertheless, the emergence of GPSC-10, characterized by high antimicrobial resistance levels, highlights the need for continuous genomic surveillance. Additional strategies to address this ongoing challenge are required, such as antibiotic stewardship programmes and the implementation of PCVs targeting serotype 19A, which is the dominant serotype within GPSC-10.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the technical and medical members of the Department of Microbiology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia, and Sawsan Bradai from the team of the research laboratory LR03SP03 for data management and technical support. We would also like to thank the GPS project staff for their cooperation and prompt response when updating their database with Tunisian sequencing data.
Abbreviations
- AMR
antimicrobial resistance
- CC
clonal complex
- GPS
Global Pneumococcal Sequencing
- GPSC
Global Pneumococcal Sequence Cluster
- IPD
invasive pneumococcal disease
- MDR
multi-drug resistance
- MIC
minimum inhibitory concentration
- ML
machine learning
- PBP
penicillin-binding protein
- PCV
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
- ST
sequence type
- WGS
whole-genome sequencing
Footnotes
Funding: This study was funded by Pfizer (grant number: ISR 76356933).
Ethical statement: This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, Tunisia (approval number N76/24).
Contributor Information
Fahmi Smaoui, Email: smaouifahmi@yahoo.fr.
Boutheina Ksibi, Email: ksibi-taina@outlook.com.
NourElhouda Ben Ayed, Email: bayednour@yahoo.fr.
Sonia Ktari, Email: sonia_ktari2002@yahoo.fr.
Omar Gargouri, Email: omar.gargouri@medecinesfax.org.
Senda Mezghani, Email: maalejsenda69@gmail.com.
Basma Mnif, Email: basmamnif@gmail.com.
Faouzia Mahjoubi, Email: mahjoubi_faouzia@medecinesfax.org.
Adnene Hammami, Email: hammami.adnene@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Weiser JN, Ferreira DM, Paton JC. Streptococcus pneumoniae: transmission, colonization and invasion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:355–367. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0001-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scelfo C, Menzella F, Fontana M, Ghidoni G, Galeone C, et al. Pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal diseases: the role of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the era of multi-drug resistance. Vaccines. 2021;9:420. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9050420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iovino F, Henriques-Normark B. Experimental model for studies of pneumococcal colonization in older adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203:539–540. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3681ED. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rightmier E, Stevens V, Brown J. Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccination in older adults. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011;9:392–404. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vila-Corcoles A, Ochoa-Gondar O. Preventing pneumococcal disease in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2013;30:263–276. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0060-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fletcher MA, Laufer DS, McIntosh EDG, Cimino C, Malinoski FJ. Controlling invasive pneumococcal disease: is vaccination of at-risk groups sufficient? Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:450–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00858.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cedrone F, Montagna V, Del Duca L, Camplone L, Mazzocca R, et al. The burden of Streptococcus pneumoniae-related admissions and in-hospital mortality: a retrospective observational study between the years 2015 and 2022 from a southern Italian province. Vaccines. 2023;11:1324. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roth A, Reichmann P, Hakenbeck R. The capsule of Streptococcus pneumoniae contributes to virulence in the insect model Manduca sexta. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;22:326–334. doi: 10.1159/000345327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paton JC, Trappetti C. Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7:10. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0019-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manna S, Werren JP, Ortika BD, Bellich B, Pell CL, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 33G: genetic, serological, and structural analysis of a new capsule type. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12:e0357923. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03579-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Larsson M, Nguyen HQ, Olson L, Tran TK, Nguyen TV, et al. Multi-drug resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae among children in rural Vietnam more than doubled from 1999 to 2014. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110:1916–1923. doi: 10.1111/apa.15795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Senok A, Thomsen J, Abdulrazzaq NM, UAE AMR Surveillance Consortium. Menezes GA, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: a retrospective analysis of emerging trends in the United Arab Emirates from 2010 to 2021. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1244357. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1244357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sallam M, Abbadi J, Natsheh A, Ababneh NA, Mahafzah A, et al. Trends in antimicrobial drug resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates at Jordan University Hospital (2000–2018) Antibiotics. 2019;8:41. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8020041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mohanty S, Feemster K, Yu KC, Watts JA, Gupta V. Trends in Streptococcus pneumoniae antimicrobial resistance in US children: a multicenter evaluation. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10:ofad098. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li L, Ma J, Yu Z, Li M, Zhang W, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and antibiotic resistance mechanisms of Streptococcus pneumoniae: an updated review. Microbiol Res. 2023;266:127221. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.van de Sande-Bruinsma N, Grundmann H, Verloo D, Tiemersma E, Monen J, et al. Antimicrobial drug use and resistance in Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1722–1730. doi: 10.3201/eid1411.070467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lagoubi Y, Sfar MT, Gomez JA. A cost-effectiveness analysis of PHiD-CV compared to PCV13 in a national immunization program setting in Tunisia. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2022;18 doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2079305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ktari S, Jmal I, Mroua M, Maalej S, Ben Ayed NE, et al. Serotype distribution and antibiotic susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains in the south of Tunisia: a five-year study (2012-2016) of pediatric and adult populations. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;65:110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ben Ayed N, Ktari S, Jdidi J, Gargouri O, Smaoui F, et al. Nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Tunisian healthy under-five children during a three-year survey period (2020 to 2022) Vaccines. 2024;12:393. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12040393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bentley SD, Lo SW. Global genomic pathogen surveillance to inform vaccine strategies: a decade-long expedition in pneumococcal genomics. Genome Med. 2021;13:84. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00901-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gladstone RA, Lo SW, Lees JA, Croucher NJ, van Tonder AJ, et al. International genomic definition of pneumococcal lineages, to contextualise disease, antibiotic resistance and vaccine impact. EBioMedicine. 2019;43:338–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carvalho M da GS, Tondella ML, McCaustland K, Weidlich L, McGee L, et al. Evaluation and improvement of real-time PCR assays targeting lytA, ply, and psaA genes for detection of pneumococcal DNA. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2460–2466. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02498-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Park HK, Lee S-J, Yoon JW, Shin JW, Shin H-S, et al. Identification of the cpsA gene as a specific marker for the discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from viridans group streptococci. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:1146–1152. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.017798-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pai R, Gertz RE, Beall B. Sequential multiplex PCR approach for determining capsular serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:124–131. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.1.124-131.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Di Tommaso P, Chatzou M, Floden EW, Barja PP, Palumbo E, et al. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:316–319. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Epping L, Van Tonder AJ, Gladstone RA, Bentley SD, Page AJ, et al. Corrigendum: SeroBA: rapid high-throughput serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae from whole genome sequence data. Microb Genom. 2018;4:e000204. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Francisco AP, Bugalho M, Ramirez M, Carriço JA. Global optimal eBURST analysis of multilocus typing data using a graphic matroid approach. BMC Bioinf. 2009;10:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lees JA, Harris SR, Tonkin-Hill G, Gladstone RA, Lo SW, et al. Fast and flexible bacterial genomic epidemiology with PopPUNK. Genome Res. 2019;29:304–316. doi: 10.1101/gr.241455.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hunt M, Mather AE, Sánchez-Busó L, Page AJ, Parkhill J, et al. ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads. Microb Genomics. 2017;3:e000131. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li Y, Metcalf BJ, Chochua S, Li Z, Gertz RE, Jr, et al. Penicillin-binding protein transpeptidase signatures for tracking and predicting β-lactam resistance levels in Streptococcus pneumoniae. mBio. 2016;7:e00756-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00756-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Food and Drug Administration . Guidance for Industry and FDA. Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems., Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration. Silver Spring, MD: U.S Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Croucher NJ, Page AJ, Connor TR, Delaney AJ, Keane JA, et al. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:W78–W82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sheppard CL, Manna S, Groves N, Litt DJ, Amin-Chowdhury Z, et al. PneumoKITy: a fast, flexible, specific, and sensitive tool for Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype screening and mixed serotype detection from genome sequence data. Microbial Genomics. 2022;8 doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kapatai G, Sheppard CL, Al-Shahib A, Litt DJ, Underwood AP, et al. Whole genome sequencing of Streptococcus pneumoniae: development, evaluation and verification of targets for serogroup and serotype prediction using an automated pipeline. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2477. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Higgs C, Kumar LS, Stevens K, Strachan J, Sherry NL, et al. Population structure, serotype distribution and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing invasive disease in Victoria, Australia. Genomics. 2023;9:mgen001070. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Henares D, Lo SW, Perez-Argüello A, Redin A, Ciruela P, et al. Comparison of next generation technologies and bioinformatics pipelines for capsular typing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2023;61:e0074123. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00741-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.WHO Publication Pneumococcal vaccines WHO position paper – 2012 – Recommendations. Vaccine. 2012;30:4717–4718. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Løchen A, Croucher NJ, Anderson RM. Divergent serotype replacement trends and increasing diversity in pneumococcal disease in high income settings reduce the benefit of expanding vaccine valency. Sci Rep. 2020;10:18977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75691-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chaguza C, Yang M, Jacques LC, Bentley SD, Kadioglu A. Serotype 1 pneumococcus: epidemiology, genomics, and disease mechanisms. Trends Microbiol. 2022;30:581–592. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li Y, Metcalf BJ, Chochua S, Li Z, Gertz RE, Jr, et al. Validation of β-lactam minimum inhibitory concentration predictions for pneumococcal isolates with newly encountered penicillin binding protein (PBP) sequences. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:621. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4017-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cherazard R, Epstein M, Doan T-L, Salim T, Bharti S, et al. Antimicrobial resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Am J Ther. 2017;24:e361–e369. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cillóniz C, Garcia-Vidal C, Ceccato A, Torres A. Antimicrobial resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Resist. 2018:13–38. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78538-7_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chancey ST, Agrawal S, Schroeder MR, Farley MM, Tettelin H, et al. Composite mobile genetic elements disseminating macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:26. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zahari NIN, Engku Abd Rahman ENS, Irekeola AA, Ahmed N, Rabaan AA, et al. A review of the resistance mechanisms for β-lactams, macrolides and fluoroquinolones among Streptococcus pneumoniae. Medicina. 2023;59:1927. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ben Ayed N, Gargouri O, Mhimdi S, Smaoui F, Mhiri E, et al. The evolution of the antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Tunisia: a multicentric analysis over two decades (2000–2019) Antibiotics. 2025;14:171. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14020171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Huang X, Tan H, Lu F, Guo G, Han M, et al. Molecular characterization of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates from a tertiary children’s hospital in eastern China. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:e0091323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00913-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lo SW, Hawkins PA, Jibir B, Hassan-Hanga F, Gambo M, et al. Molecular characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing disease among children in Nigeria during the introduction of PCV10 (GSK) Microb Genom. 2023;9:001094. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Golden AR, Adam HJ, Karlowsky JA, Baxter M, Schellenberg J, et al. Genomic investigation of the most common Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes causing invasive infections in Canada: the SAVE study, 2011-2020. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023;78:i26–i36. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lekhuleni C, Ndlangisa K, Gladstone RA, Chochua S, Metcalf BJ, et al. Impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on invasive pneumococcal disease-causing lineages among South African children. Nat Commun. 2024;15:8401. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52459-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pneumococcal Disease. 2024. [23-August-2024]. https://www.cdc.gov/pneumococcal/php/drug-resistance/index.html accessed.
- 56.Shi X, Patil S, Wang Q, Liu Z, Zhu C, et al. Prevalence and resistance characteristics of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from the respiratory tracts of hospitalized children in Shenzhen, China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;13 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1332472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Javaid N, Olwagen C, Nzenze S, Hawkins P, Gladstone R, et al. Population genomics of pneumococcal carriage in South Africa following the introduction of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) immunization. Microb Genomics. 2022;8:000831. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mott MP, Caierão J, Cunha GR, Del Maschi MM, Pizzutti K, et al. Emergence of serotype 19A Streptococcus pneumoniae after PCV10 associated with a ST320 in adult population, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Epidemiol Infect. 2019;147:e93. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819000013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Luck JN, Tettelin H, Orihuela CJ. Sugar-coated killer: serotype 3 pneumococcal disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:613287. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.613287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.