Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1981 Sep;318:413–427. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013875

The relationship between response amplitude and contrast for cat striate cortical neurones.

A F Dean
PMCID: PMC1245500  PMID: 7320898

Abstract

1. The activity of forty-three neurones in the cat's striate cortex in response to laterally moving sinusoidal gratings of various contrasts was recorded, in order to examine the relationship between response amplitude and contrast. 2. Neurones seemed to exhibit contrast thresholds: stimuli of very low contrast failed to evoke a change in the response amplitude from the concurrent levels of spontaneous activity. 3. The suprathreshold portion of the response-contrast relation was found to be monotonic. Typically, the relation was adequately described as linear up to contrasts of about 0.3, above which, varying degrees of saturation were evident. 4. The response-contrast relation had a higher threshold and a shallower slope when the spatial frequency was not optimal for the neurone. 5. The slope, or gain, of the response-contrast relation for a stimulus of optimal orientation and spatial frequency varied considerably from neurone to neurone. The gains of special complex cells were significantly greater than those of either standard complex cells or simple cells. 6. The distributions of contrast threshold and contrast gain were examined for their dependence on optimal spatial frequency. Contrast threshold was significantly positively correlated with optimal spatial frequency, while contrast gain was significantly negatively correlated with optimal spatial frequency. This behaviour is consistent with an optical contribution to the measured response properties of striate cortical neurones.

Full text

PDF
413

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow H. B., Levick W. R. Three factors limiting the reliable detection of light by retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Jan;200(1):1–24. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell F. W., Green D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):576–593. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell F. W., Robson J. G. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):551–566. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dreher B. Hypercomplex cells in the cat's striate cortex. Invest Ophthalmol. 1972 May;11(5):355–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Georgeson M. A., Sullivan G. D. Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. J Physiol. 1975 Nov;252(3):627–656. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilbert C. D., Kelly J. P. The projections of cells in different layers of the cat's visual cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1975 Sep;163(1):81–105. doi: 10.1002/cne.901630106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilbert C. D. Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):391–421. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilbert C. D., Wiesel T. N. Morphology and intracortical projections of functionally characterised neurones in the cat visual cortex. Nature. 1979 Jul 12;280(5718):120–125. doi: 10.1038/280120a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henry G. H., Bishop P. O., Tupper R. M., Dreher B. Orientation specificity and response variability of cells in the striate cortex. Vision Res. 1973 Sep;13(9):1771–1779. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90094-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ikeda H., Wright M. J. Sensitivity of neurones in visual cortex (area 17) under different levels of anaesthesia. Exp Brain Res. 1974;20(5):471–484. doi: 10.1007/BF00238014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ikeda H., Wright M. J. The outer disinhibitory surround of the retinal ganglion cell receptive field. J Physiol. 1972 Oct;226(2):511–544. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kelly J. P., Van Essen D. C. Cell structure and function in the visual cortex of the cat. J Physiol. 1974 May;238(3):515–547. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koike H., Mano N., Okada Y., Oshima T. Repetitive impulses generated in fast and slow pyramidal tract cells by intracellularly applied current steps. Exp Brain Res. 1970;11(3):263–281. doi: 10.1007/BF01474386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Levick W. R. Another tungsten microelectrode. Med Biol Eng. 1972 Jul;10(4):510–515. doi: 10.1007/BF02474199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maffei L., Fiorentini A. The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. Vision Res. 1973 Jul;13(7):1255–1267. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90201-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Merrill E. G., Ainsworth A. Glass-coated platinum-plated tungsten microelectrodes. Med Biol Eng. 1972 Sep;10(5):662–672. doi: 10.1007/BF02476084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Movshon J. A., Thompson I. D., Tolhurst D. J. Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:79–99. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Movshon J. A., Thompson I. D., Tolhurst D. J. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:53–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Movshon J. A., Tolhurst D. J. Proceedings: On the response linearity of neurones in cat visual cortex. J Physiol. 1975 Jul;249(1):56P–57P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Movshon J. A., Tolhurst D. J. Proceedings: The use of a digital computer in the study of neuronal properties in the visual system. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(1):2P–4P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. OTSUKA R., HASSLER R. [On the structure and segmentation of the cortical center of vision in the cat]. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr. 1962;203:212–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00352744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Robson J. G., Enroth-Cugell C. Light distribution in the cat's retinal image. Vision Res. 1978;18(2):159–173. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90181-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rose D. Responses of single units in cat visual cortex to moving bars of light as a function of bar length. J Physiol. 1977 Sep;271(1):1–23. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. TANNER W. P., Jr, SWETS J. A. A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychol Rev. 1954 Nov;61(6):401–409. doi: 10.1037/h0058700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES