Skip to main content
O&G Open logoLink to O&G Open
. 2024 Oct 3;1(4):37. doi: 10.1097/og9.0000000000000037

An Alternative Approach to Low-Dose Buprenorphine Induction in Pregnancy and Postpartum

Kathleen Koenigs 1, Jessica Gray 1, Evan Gale 1, Molly Siegel 1, Davida Schiff 1, Sarah Bernstein 1
PMCID: PMC12456504  PMID: 41001597

Low-dose buprenorphine induction offers an alternative approach to standard buprenorphine initiation for pregnant and newly postpartum people with opioid use disorder.

Abstract

Low-dose buprenorphine induction, unlike traditional methods, does not require that individuals experience at least moderate withdrawal before initiation. This technique has been widely used and studied in the general population; however, research in pregnancy is limited. We aimed to evaluate obstetric and neonatal outcomes after low-dose buprenorphine induction. In this retrospective case series, we reviewed all cases of low-dose induction during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum at an urban academic medical center over a 3-year period. Nine patients started buprenorphine using this method, and all but one completed induction. There was a high rate of treatment retention and no apparent associated adverse neonatal events. Four individuals are in sustained remission and currently parenting. Though further research is needed, low-dose buprenorphine induction appears effective in the obstetric population.


Buprenorphine and methadone are first-line treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnancy due to demonstrated maternal and neonatal benefit.1 Unlike methadone, traditional buprenorphine induction requires that individuals experience at least moderate withdrawal before administration to minimize the risk of precipitated withdrawal. Low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation (previously described in the literature as “microinduction”) avoids withdrawal before initiation.2 With fentanyl dominating the drug supply, the risk of precipitated withdrawal has increased, making low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation a favorable option for many patients.3 Although this method has been widely used and researched among the general population with OUD, literature in pregnancy is limited to two case reports and two small case series, none of which report obstetric or neonatal outcomes.47 We sought to evaluate perinatal outcomes after utilization of this technique.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case series of all pregnant and postpartum people treated with low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation for OUD at Massachusetts General Hospital from January 2020 through October 2023. The maternal cohort was identified using an IRB-approved database of all opioid-exposed newborns Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine whether low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation was used during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum. Maternal demographics, substance use history, psychiatric comorbidities, pregnancy complications, and neonatal outcomes were abstracted from the existing database. Records were reviewed for buprenorphine protocol used, induction location, gestational age at initiation, substances used immediately prior, induction length, successful completion, presence of precipitated withdrawal, and whether individuals remained connected to medical care. The Mass General Brigham IRB approved this study as exempt health/medical records research.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation while pregnant or newly postpartum (Table 1). All patients in our cohort were White, non-Hispanic, English-speaking, publicly insured, cis-gender, and diagnosed with moderate-to-severe OUD. Three had co-existing cocaine use disorder, one had stimulant and benzodiazepine use disorder, and all but one had nicotine dependence. Four used substances intravenously, four had experienced at least one overdose, and six had a history of substance-related complications including hepatitis C virus infection, endocarditis, and skin and soft tissue infections. All patients had a history of medication treatment for OUD, although only two were receiving outpatient methadone immediately before starting low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation. The majority (7/9) had other psychiatric diagnoses. Four had a history of homelessness, and three had documented justice system involvement.

Table 1.

Low-Dose Buprenorphine Induction Details and Sample Protocol*

Maternal Age (y) Parity Setting GA at Induction (Wk) Opioids Before Induction Induction Length (d) Supportive Medications Patient Used Protocol Maintenance Dose Follow-Up Care as of March 2024
1 35 Multiparous Inpatient 17 3/7 Illicit fentanyls, methadone (used for inpatient stabilization) 3 Lorazepam, ondansetron, clonidine, loperamide Belbuca 225 micrograms every 3 h,
450 micrograms every 3 h, Suboxone 12 mg daily
Suboxone 12 mg daily 20 prenatal visits, sustained remission postpartum with more than 6 mo of follow-up, parenting, remains on buprenorphine
2 37 Multiparous Inpatient 20 5/7 Prescribed oral morphine and IV hydromorphone 10 Hydroxyzine, clonazepam Subutex 1 mg daily, 1 mg twice/d, 2 mg twice/d, 4 mg twice/d Subutex 24 mg daily (discharged on 4 mg twice/d) 23 prenatal visits, no postpartum visits, remained on buprenorphine and connected with general medical care
3 32 Multiparous Outpatient 21 5/7 Illicit fentanyls, nonprescribed opioids 15 Lorazepam Suboxone 0.25 mg daily, 0.25 mg twice/d, 0.5 mg twice/d, 1 mg twice/d, 2 mg twice/d, 2 mg 3 times/d, 4 mg twice/d, 8 mg every morning + 4 mg every evening, 8 mg 3 times/d Suboxone 24 mg daily 10 prenatal visits, sporadic postpartum care over less than 3 mo, transitioned to buprenorphine XR
4 32 Primiparous Outpatient, transitioned to inpatient 22 5/7 Methadone (maintenance treatment), illicit fentanyls 9 Clonazepam, clonidine Belbuca 750 micrograms daily, 900 micrograms twice/d, suboxone 4 mg twice/d, 6 mg twice/d Suboxone 6 mg twice/d 19 prenatal visits, more than 1 y of follow-up postpartum, on buprenorphine extended release, receiving psychiatric care, does not have custody
5 33 Multiparous Outpatient 22 6/7 Methadone (maintenance treatment), illicit fentanyls 10 None Suboxone 0.5 mg daily, 0.5 mg twice/d, 1 mg twice/d, 2 mg twice/d, 3 mg twice/d, 4 mg twice/d, 8 mg twice/d Suboxone 8 mg twice/d (evening dose split) 14 prenatal visits, more than 6 mo postpartum follow-up, initially in remission and parenting on buprenorphine, recently lost to follow-up
6 40 Multiparous Outpatient 27 1/7 Illicit fentanyls Did not complete Hydroxyzine, quetiapine Subutex 0.5 mg every 3 h, 1 mg every 3 h NA 23 prenatal visits, more than 2 y follow-up postpartum, sustained remission on methadone, parenting
7 39 Multiparous Inpatient 33 3/7 Illicit fentanyls, methadone (used for inpatient stabilization) 7, experienced precipitated withdrawal Hydroxyzine, clonazepam, clonidine, quetiapine Belbuca 225 micrograms twice/d,
450 micrograms twice/d,
900 micrograms twice/d,
subutex 4 mg twice/d, 8 mg twice/d
Subutex 8 mg twice/d Lost to follow-up
8 24 Multiparous Inpatient Postpartum Methadone (maintenance treatment), prescribed oxycodone 7 Ondansetron Belbuca 75 micrograms twice/d, 150 micrograms twice/d, 300 micrograms twice/d, 450 micrograms twice/d, suboxone 2 mg twice/d, 4 mg twice/d, 8 mg twice/d Suboxone 8 mg twice/d More than 1 y postpartum follow-up, parenting, initially transitioned to buprenorphine XR, most recently off MOUD
9 37 Primiparous Inpatient Postpartum Illicit fentanyls, methadone (used for inpatient stabilization) 4 Clonidine, quetiapine Belbuca 225 micrograms every 3 h, 450 micrograms every 3 h,
suboxone 12 mg daily
Suboxone 12 mg daily Sustained remission postpartum with more than 2 y of follow-up, still parenting, remains on buprenorphine

GA, gestational age; IV, intravenous; XR, extended release; NA, not applicable; MOUD, medications for opioid use disorder.

*

Sample Inpatient Protocol Based on Clinical Experience (Must be tailored to individual patient needs and available buprenorphine formulations. Comfort medication recommendations beyond the scope of this study.)

Day 1: Belbuca (buprenorphine buccal film) 225 micrograms ×1 dose. Continue methadone or other opioids being used to control withdrawal or pain.

Day 2: Belbuca 225 micrograms every 12 hours ×2 doses.

Day 3: Belbuca 450 micrograms every 12 hours ×2 doses.

Day 4: Belbuca 900 micrograms every 12 hours ×2 doses.

Day 5: Suboxone (buprenorphine/naloxone) 4-1 mg every 12 hours ×2 doses. Last dose of methadone or other opioids being used to control withdrawal.

Day 6: Suboxone 8-2 mg every 12 hours. Stop methadone or other opioids being used to control withdrawal. Continue opioids for acute or chronic pain as needed. Continue uptitration of Suboxone as needed.

Five patients underwent inpatient low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation, two immediately after delivery, two admitted antepartum exclusively for OUD stabilization, and one during an antepartum admission for osteomyelitis. Four patients opted for outpatient induction, including one who did not finish the induction and another who transitioned to the inpatient setting to complete induction. One patient experienced precipitated withdrawal but completed the induction and had no adverse obstetric or neonatal outcomes.

Of the seven patients who underwent low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation during pregnancy, only one delivered a newborn with 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 (Table 2). That newborn was delivered 3 months after low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation at 35 weeks of gestation by emergent cesarean under general anesthesia. Five newborns received pharmacologic therapy for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. All nine newborns were reported to the child protection system as was standard practice at that time for any substance-exposed newborn. There was a high rate of treatment retention, with seven patients remaining on buprenorphine in either sublingual or injection form at their 6-week postpartum visits. Only one patient was lost to follow-up care. At the time of this study, four individuals had at least 1 year of sustained remission and parenting.

Table 2.

Neonatal Outcomes Among Individuals Who Received Low-Dose Buprenorphine Induction in Pregnancy or Postpartum

GA at Delivery (Wk) Mode of Delivery, Analgesia Delivery Complications Birth Weight (g) (Percentile) 1-Min Apgar Score, 5-Min Apgar Score Location(s) of Neonatal Care Reason for NICU Admission Maternal Psychiatric Medications at Delivery Neonatal Urine Toxicology Test Result (Nonprescribed) Pharmacologic Treatment for NOWS Day of Life at Discharge Length of Opioid Treatment (d)
1 39 5/7 Vaginal, epidural 3,590 (69) 8, 9 Nursery None Negative No 5 NA
2 37 1/7 Vaginal, epidural 2,195 (3) 9, 9 Nursery and special care nursery Gabapentin, clonazepam, Adderall Negative Yes 14 12
3 35 3/7 Emergent cesarean, general PPROM, PTL, footling breech 2,480 (52) 2, 4 Special care nursery and NICU Respiratory distress, prematurity None Cocaine Yes 13 7
4 37 5/7 Cesarean, combined spinal epidural 3,170 (45) 8, 8 NICU Respiratory distress in the setting of VACTERL with tetralogy of Fallot None Fentanyl Yes 47 36
5 37 1/7 Vaginal, epidural 2,350 (7) 8, 9 Nursery None Negative No 4 NA
6 39 5/7 Vaginal, combined spinal epidural 3,385 (39) 7, 9 Nursery Trazodone, clonazepam, sertraline Negative No 5 NA
7 39 0/7 Vaginal, epidural 3,060 (35) 8, 9 Nursery and special care nursery Fluoxetine, alprazolam, Adderall Fentanyl, cocaine Yes 5 (transferred) Unknown
8 33 0/7 Emergent cesarean, general PPROM, cord prolapse, chorioamnionitis 1,840 (32) 3, 8 Special care nursery and NICU Respiratory distress, prematurity Clonidine, aripiprazole Negative No 16 (transferred) NA
9 35 5/7 Emergent cesarean, spinal Severe preeclampsia, intracranial hemorrhage 2,715 (55) 8, 9 Nursery and NICU Respiratory distress, prematurity Lorazepam Fentanyl Yes 16 14

GA, gestational age; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; NOWS, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome; NA, not available; PPROM, premature prelabor rupture of membranes; PTL, preterm labor; VACTERL, vertebral anomalies, anal atresia, cardiac malformations, tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia, renal anomalies, and limb anomalies.

DISCUSSION

Challenges with traditional buprenorphine induction require new approaches to meet the needs of pregnant and newly postpartum people with OUD. Previous small studies have demonstrated the feasibility of low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation in this population, and our findings detailing both maternal and neonatal outcomes provide further support.47 Despite a high degree of medical and psychosocial complexity, the majority of patients completed the protocol, remained on buprenorphine, and stayed connected to care. This method seemed especially useful in cases of high ongoing opioid requirements after cesarean delivery, allowing seamless buprenorphine stabilization without triggering severe withdrawal symptoms at a time when maternal stability is critical for early parenting success.

Protocols for low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation vary across institutions, and further research is needed to determine the optimal approach in pregnancy and postpartum. As seen in our case series, even within one institution, initial buprenorphine dose and time to dose stabilization is highly individualized and affected by differential access to various buprenorphine products. However, we hope to equip obstetricians and substance use disorder care professionals with a framework for low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation (see Table 1 for sample protocol).

Further research with larger, more diverse patient populations is needed to better characterize the optimal regimen and who might benefit most, along with qualitative research to understand the patient experience. Although that research is underway, we encourage treatment teams supporting pregnant and postpartum patients through buprenorphine induction to consider using low-dose buprenorphine induction with opioid continuation.

Footnotes

Dr. Schiff was supported by NIDA (K23DA048169).

Each author has confirmed compliance with the journal's requirements for authorship.

Corresponding author: Kathleen Koenigs, MD, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; kkoenigs1@mgh.harvard.edu.

Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Peer reviews and author correspondence are available at http://links.lww.com/AOG/D856.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Opioid use and opioid use disorder in pregnancy. Committee Opinion No. 711. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e81–94. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weimer MB, Herring AA, Kawasaki SS, Meyer M, Kleykamp BA, Ramsey KS. ASAM clinical considerations: buprenorphine treatment of opioid use disorder for individuals using high-potency synthetic opioids. J Addict Med 2023;17:632–9. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Varshneya NB, Thakrar AP, Hobelmann JG, Dunn KE, Huhn AS. Evidence of buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal in persons who use fentanyl. J Addict Med 2022;16:e265–8. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coish R, Hardial J. Successful buprenorphine/naloxone low-dose induction in pregnancy: a case report. J Addict Med 2023;17:114–6. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Junn S, Tugarinov N, Mark K. Low-dose induction of buprenorphine in pregnancy: a case series. J Addict Med 2024;18:62–4. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kelly JC, Raghuraman N, Stout MJ, Russell S, Perez M, Nazeer S, et al. Home induction of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2021;138:655–9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reddy S, Martin CE. Low-dose buprenorphine initiation during pregnancy: a case report. AJOG Glob Rep 2024;4:100308. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from O&G Open are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES